Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-12-18 - City Commission Joint Workshop Meeting Minutes'CITY OF TAMARAC
7525 Northwest 88 Avenue
Tamarac, Florida 33321-2401
Phone (305) 722-5900
Fax (305) 722-4509
December 11, 1991
NOTICE OF
JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING
CITY COUNCIL AND CHARTER BOARD
There will be a Joint Workshop Meeting of the City Council and
Charter Board on Wednesday, December 18, 1991 at 10:00 a.m. in
Conference Room #1 of Tamarac City Hall, 7525 N.W. 88th Avenue,
Tamarac, Florida.
The purpose of this meeting is discussion on proposed Charter
amendments.
The City Council may consider such other business as may come
before it.
All meetings are open to the public.
In the event this agenda must be revised, such revised copies will
be available to the public at the City Council meeting.
Carol A. Evans
City Clerk
CAE/nr
rHE CITY OF TAMARAC IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER AND DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE ON THE BASIS OF HANDICAPPED STATUS
CITY OF TAMARAC
JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING
CITY COUNCIL AND CHARTER BOARD
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1991
Tape 1
CALL TO ORDER Mayor Abramowitz called the Joint Workshop Meeting to
order at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, December 18, 1991 in Conference Room
#1, City Hall.
PRESENT FOR THE CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Norman Abramowitz
Vice Mayor Dr. H. Larry Bender
Councilwoman Diane Glasser
Councilman Henry Schumann
Councilman Irving Katz
PRESENT FOR THE CHARTER BOARD
Chairwoman Muriel Davis
Vice Chairwoman Judith Kitograd
Morton Winter
David Krantz
Issac "Zeke" Feldman
ALSO PRESENT :
John P. Kelly, City Manager
Alan F. Ruf, City Attorney
Carol A. Evans, City Clerk
Paul Novack, Attorney for Charter Board
Ellen Wood, Secretary
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Abramowitz said the purpose of the meeting was to discuss
amendments proposed by the Charter Board.
Mayor Abramowitz distributed a time schedule on verbiage and
procedures which City Clerk Evans had to have but there was another
schedule to which Council had to adhere.
City Manager Kelly said Council also had the appropriate back-up in
order to send the proper documentation to Jane Carroll. He said two
public hearings had to be held before sending anything to Jane
Carroll.
Mayor Abramowitz asked for the latest dates to accomplish getting
the ballot work to Jane Carroll by January 17, 1992.
City Clerk Evans said the ad for the second public hearing on
January 16 had to be in the newspaper by January 6, 1992. She said
the first public hearing and reading of the Ordinances should be
December 30 or 31 and would allow her, without problems, to
advertise by January 6. She said she had to adhere to the
newspapers' holiday schedule.
City Clerk Evans said the second public hearing on any Ordinances by
Council should be to Jane Carroll by, January 16 and the ballot
wording the next day, January 17, 1991.
Mayor Abramowitz asked if the public hearing could be held at the
second meeting and City Clerk Evans said, yes. Mayor Abramowitz
said Council had to hold their first reading on December 30 or 31 or
sooner. He said by January 16 or sooner, Council must have the
second reading and public hearing.
City Clerk Evans said she did not believe the second public hearing
could be held sooner because she had to advertise 10 days before the
public hearing which was the second reading. Mayor Abramowitz said
there would be more leeway if the meeting was held before December
30 or 31 and City Clerk Evans said, yes.
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 2
Vice Chai.rwoman.Kitograd asked if the City had to advertise 10 days
before December 30 or 31 and City Clerk Evans said, no, but that she
had to advertise before the second reading when the public hearing
would be held. She said the Titles of the Ordinances were
advertised for the second reading.
Mayor Abramowitz said Council and the Charter Board met twice before
and hoped they would take action regarding the proposals on the
ballot. He said the Charter Board and Council had indicated what
they wanted on the ballot and today's meeting would make the final
determination.
Chairwoman Davis said at the last Charter Board meeting, it was
decided to extend the terms of the Mayor and Council from two years
to three years under Proposal 4.02(a). She said the Charter Board
also wanted to amend the limit of terms from two consecutive terms
to three consecutive terms.
Mayor Abramowitz asked if this constituted two ballot amendments and
City Attorney Ruf said Attorney Novack made this recommendation.
Mayor Abramowitz asked if two amendments were required and Attorney
Novack said, no, but in his opinion, it was clearer with two
amendments because there were two different questions.
Attorney Novack said it was hard to foresee if two amendments were
required because the City would not want to have multiple questions
within one proposed amendment.
Mayor Abramowitz asked what would happen if the voters did not
approve extending the terms for the Mayor and Council from two years
to three years but approved extending the consecutive terms from two
years to three years. Attorney Novack said it be the same length of
terms but with a new number of terms.
Mr. Krantz asked if Charter Board and Council would be combined on
the amendments and Mayor Abramowitz said, no.
Mayor Abramowitz reiterated Attorney Novack's opinion that the
length of terms would be the same but there would be a new number of
terms and City Attorney Ruf said if the three-year term passed but
the three terms were not, the City would have three-year terms
twice. He said if the three-year term did not pass but the three
consecutive terms passed, the Mayor and Council could serve three
two-year terms.
Chairwoman Davis said the Charter Board wanted the two amendments to
take effect in 1993. She said the Charter Board also wanted to have
the same type of amendments, i.e., changing the number of terms from
two to three and the length of consecutive terms from two to three
years for the Charter Board to take effect in 1993.
Chairwoman Davis said the Charter Board also proposed an amendment
on redistricting and requested the Redistricting Committee submit
their final report to Council and the Charter Board and Council
would prepare the Ordinance. She said if the Charter Board
disagreed with the Redistricting Committee's report, the Charter
Board could submit their own report to the Council and Council would
prepare the Ordinance, which would become effective in 1993.
Chairwoman Davis said the Charter Board proposed an amendment
pertaining to compensation of $100 per month for Charter Board
members which would go into effect March, 1992.
Mr. Winter read a portion of Article TV, Section 4.02,, which
indicated that all Council members could not succeed themselves for
more than one term without an intervening term. He asked why
Council members could not run without an intervening term and Mayor
Abramowitz said it circumvented what the Charter dictated.
Mayor Abramowitz said if the Charter was changed, it would allow
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 3
someone to run either for a three -term limit or no limit on terms.
C/M Schumann said the verbiage should be specific on the amendments
determining two, two-year terms to three, three-year terms and this
would allow for the person who had two, two-year terms to run for
one, three-year term. C/W Glasser said this matter would become
moot if the Ordinance was passed and Mayor Abramowitz said he
agreed.
Mayor Abramowitz asked what was to be changed and Mr. Winter said if
the amendment did not pass, it might be wise to look for a change.
Mayor Abramowitz said Council also wanted to change it and nothing
could be done if it did not pass.
C/W Glasser said the amendment referred to intervening terms and
Mayor Abramowitz said the amendment indicated a person could only
run for one additional term besides the original election.
C/M Schumann said he disagreed and the Charter indicated a person
was limited to three, three --year terms. He said the Charter did not
indicate the person could not run for three additional terms.
Mayor Abramowitz said the Charter indicated a person could not run
once the person had exceeded his limit without an intervening term.
C/M Schumann said the person could run for Mayor because it was a
different office and Mayor Abramowitz said he agreed.
Mayor Abramowitz said if the three -term limit or the unlimited
amount of terms passed, they circumvented the Charter and C/W
Glasser said the Charter would change 6n1 if the amendment passed.
C/W Glasser said if the Mayor chose to run for Council, he did not
have to have an intervening term but it discriminated against the
other Council members who could not succeed themselves. C/M
Schumann said the Mayor could not succeed himself and Mr. Winter
said the Mayor could run for Council.
Mayor Abramowitz said if the amendment passed, it meant the person
could run for more terms than what Section 4.02 stated. C/M
Schumann said Districts 1 and 3 could not do this because they did
not have the opportunity to run with the Mayor. He said if
Distracts 2 and 4 were up and the position of Mayor was open,
Districts 1 and 3 could not run unless they resigned.
Mayor Abramowitz asked how this could be rectified and C/M Katz
suggested waiting for the March, 1992 election. He said if the
amendment did not pass, it could go on the next referendum in
November.
Mr. Feldman said only the wording could be changed in the event
there was disagreement between Council and the Charter Board.
Mayor Abramowitz said the Charter Board expressed interest in six
items for the March ballot and he suggested that Council discuss
each one individually although they did not have to agree on them.
Mayor Abramowitz asked if six were too many items for the ballot and
the Council members said they did not think so.
Mayor Abramowitz said redistricting could/wait for a later election
and Chairwoman Davis said she agreed. C/W Glasser said she agreed
with Chairwoman Davis.
Mayor Abramowitz said if there were no objections, he would remove
redistricting from the amendments.
1) REMUNERATION FOR THE CHARTER BOARD : Mayor Abramowitz said he
had no prob em putting remuneration or the Charter Board on the
March ballot and C/M Schumann said he agreed. V/M Bender said he
agreed to put remuneration on the ballot and C/M Katz said he wanted
to wait. He said Council should be considered on the first
L
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 4
referendum with regard to remuneration. C/W Glasser said she had no
problem with putting remuneration for the Charter Board on the March
ballot. Mayor Abramowitz said remuneration should also go on the
first referendum.
Mayor Abramowitz said the remuneration would be subject to all the
laws, rules and regulations of the City, State and Broward County.
C/W Glasser asked if the remuneration would be accounted for or was
it considered salary because it had to be stated in the referendum
and Mayor Abramowitz said if it was salary, he would change his
vote. C/M Schumann said compensation was salary if compensation was
used and Mayor Abramowitz said the word could be repayment.
Vice Chairwoman Kitograd said the Charter Board meant the word to be
compensation or $100 per month salary. She said the Charter Board
would have to pay taxes if it was a salary.
V/M Bender said when remuneration was first discussed, he asked if
the Charter Board received any expense money and members of the
Charter Board said, no. He suggested that Charter Board members
receive a separate expense account or increase the salary
compensation.
Mayor Abramowitz said there was no secondary work involved if it was
salary. He said he could not agree with increasing the amount to
$200.
C/M Schumann reiterated that compensation was salary and V/M Bender
said he agreed with $100 for salary. C/W Glasser said salary was
fine.
C/W Glasser asked when the remuneration would go into effect and
Mayor Abramowitz said immediately.
Mayor Abramowitz said remuneration for the Charter Board would go on
the March ballot.
City Manager Kelly said the verbiage should be salary.
2) EXTENDING THE TERMS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL AND EXTENDING THE
LENGTH OF TERM OF OFFICE FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL : City Attorney
Ruf asked if Attorney Novack prepared the Ordinance and Vice
Chairwoman Kitograd said, yes.
Mayor Abramowitz asked that each Council member get a copy of all
proposed Ordinances prepared by Attorney Novack and Chairwoman Davis
said they were distributed with the last set of minutes.
C/M Schumann said he wanted unlimited terms and V/M Bender said he
wanted three years, unlimited terms. C/M Katz said he wanted
unlimited terms and C/W Glasser said three years, limited terms.
Mayor Abramowitz said he agreed with V/M Bender with three years,
unlimited terms.
C/M Katz asked if the number of terms would be separate from the
length of terms and Mayor Abramowitz said, yes, because the Charter
Board expressed interest in changing the length of terms from two
years to three years and extending the number of terms from two
consecutive terms to three consecutive terms.
C/M Schumann asked if the amendment would be changed from two, two--
year terms to three year terms unlimited and Mayor Abramowitz said
it had to be two separate amendments.
C/M Schumann said in his opinion, the two amendments could be
combined into one referendum. City Attorney Ruf said Attorney
Novack indicated these should be separate referendums.
Mayor Abramowitz said Attorney Novack indicated the Charter Board
proposed a limit of three-year terms.
N
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 5
Attorney Novack said the general requirement was the amendment had
to cantain a single subject but it was two subjects because one
limited the terms of office and the other provided for the length of
the term of office. He said it should be two subjects with two
issues and they should be separated.
C/M Schumann asked what proposal would be used to change from two,
two-year terms to three year terms unlimited and Attorney Novack
responded that one amendment would be to change the length of term
from two years to three years. He said then if Council wanted to
change it from a two -term limitation to unlimited, that would be the
next proposal.
C/M Schumann asked if unlimited terms still meant unlimited two-year
terms and Attorney Novack said three was the number of years in a
term. He said it would be up to the voters.
Mayor Abramowitz asked if there was any problem about separating the
amendments and C/M Schumann said, no. V/M Bender said the issues
would be clearer if they were separated into the terms of office
and the length of service and C/M Katz said he agreed with V/M
Bender. C/W Glasser said she was also in agreement and Mayor
Abramowitz said he also agreed.
Mayor Abramowitz said one amendment would change the two-year term
to a three-year term and the other issue would change from two terms
to unlimited terms.
Chairwoman Davis said Council wanted the three term limitation and
the Charter Board said it would be difficult to unseat an incumbent
and it was better to have a nine-year limit.
Vice Chairwoman Kitograd said she understood that Council was not
unanimous in supporting limited terms. She asked if both bodies
would vote or proceed with a majority vote by the Council and Mayor
Abramowitz said Council was the only body to put a referendum on the
ballot and they indicated their preference. He said based on a
legal opinion, the Charter Board could not vote down what Council
decided.
Tape 2
Mayor Abramowitz said Council originally suggested unlimited terms
and a Charter Board member suggested limited terms. He said he cast
the deciding vote for a three -term limit.
3. EXTENDING THE TERMS OP OFFICE AND THE LENGTH OF TERMS OF THE
CHARTER BOARD : Mayor Abramowitz said the Charter Boar
recommended c anging their term in office from two years to three
years. C/M Katz said this was incorrect because Chairwoman Davis
said they wanted to have three, three-year terms. He said he had no
objections to this and Mayor Abramowitz said he agreed.
Vice Chairwoman Kitograd said if the referendum for Council was for
unlimited terms, the Charter Board should also indicated unlimited
terms. Mr. Krantz asked to vote on this issue and City Manager
Kelly said he could express his interest but votes were not cast at
a Workshop.
Chairwoman Davis said she agreed with Vice Chairwoman Kitograd's
comments about unlimited terms for Council and Charter Board. Mr.
Krantz said he agreed with Chairwoman Davis and Vice Chairwoman
Kitograd. Mr. Winter and Mr. Feldman said unlimited terms.
C/M Schumann said he agreed with the Charter Board on unlimited
terms for Council and the Charter Board and V/M Bender said he
agreed with C/M Schumann. C/M Katz said he agreed with C/M Schumann
and V/M Bender and C/W Glasser said she wanted limited terms for
Council and the Charter Board. Mayor Abramowitz said.he would go
with unlimited terms for Council and the Charter Board.
Mayor Abramowitz said Council expressed the Charter Board's term in
office should run from two 'years to three years and the length of
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 6
term of office should be from two terms to unlimited three-year
terms.
V/M Bender said these changes in the terms in office and the length
of terms for the Charter Board were reflected in Article VIII,
Section 8.01(a).
V/M Bender said the changes in the terms in office and the length of
terms for Council were reflected in Article IV, Section 4.02.
Mayor Abramowitz said the voters needed clarification on what
constituted the budget and C/M Schumann referred to Article VII,
Section 7.13.
4. BUDGET : C/M Schumann asked in Section 7.13 if 2% or 2-1/2%
applieU- tothe general fund or the total City budget because in his
opinion, the general fund was the total budget.
Mayor Abramowitz said with the exception of the Enterprise Fund, the
budget wag comprised of all funds, including the Utilities, in the
City.
Mayor Abramowitz said there were three opportunities next year to
put articles on the ballot and he asked if anyone had any comments.
Chairwoman Davis said she wanted to wait until September. She said
there were five items on the ballot at this time and C/M Katz said
he disagreed because budget preparation would begin in July and he
wanted anything related to the budget defined prior to July.
Mayor Abramowitz said the legal opinion was to take both budgets and
2% would be based on the total amount of those dollars. He said
many issues in the Charter had to be reviewed.
Mayor Abramowitz said he agreed with Chairwoman Davis that the
budget needed a great deal of explanation. C/M Schumann said the
Charter stated, "the then current budget" and did not refer to a
particular budget and Mayor Abramowitz said he agreed. C/M Schumann
said he wanted someone to show him general fund in the Charter and
Mayor Abramowitz said this was the basis for the litigation.
Mayor Abramowitz said Florida's Attorney General stated publicly
when there was an issue which concerned the City, it was the City's
obligation to make them aware of the facts. C/M Schumann said if
this issue was not clarified, everytime there was an expenditure
which met the 2-1/2%, it would end with litigation.
C/W Glasser said in her opinion, the March election issues were not
as important because they would not become effective until 1993 and
Mayor Abramowitz said he disagreed.
Mayor Abramowitz suggested that Council should do more research on
the budget issue and it should be put on the ballot for the next
election along with remuneration for the Council. He suggested
financial issues be put on the second portion of the ballot.
Mayor Abramowitz suggested that Council give their expressions of
interest on some financial issues he found important. C/M Katz
suggested that Council and Charter Board discuss the issues brought
up by City Clerk Evans.
C/M Schumann said nothing had been resolved with Article VII,
Section 7.13 and there were financial issues which should be
thoroughly discussed.
C/M Schumann said he had been discussing Section 7.13 since August
and it had to be clarified and V/M Bender said he agreed. C/M Katz
said he also agreed with C/M Schumann that now was.the time to
clarify Section 7.13. C/W Glasser said she agreed with the other
Council members.
Mayor Abramowitz asked what the language should be and C/M Schumann
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 7
said he had a draft with the proposed language and he wanted budget
defined in the Charter. He asked who the Utility budget belonged to
if it was not part of the City. He said if their assets, which were
income generated, belonged to the City, they had to be part of a
budget.
C/M Katz asked about the language and City Attorney Ruf said he
prepared verbiage for all the financial areas with the exception of
Section 7.03. He said Proposed Amendment 92-2 was Section 7.13,
which C/M Schumann wanted to put on the ballot. He said the Charter
Board and their Attorney would get copies of all the financial
issues discussed by Council.
Mayor Abramowitz said the decision had to be made today on what
would go on the ballot. He said holidays were coming up and time
was of the utmost importance.
Mayor Abramowitz called for a short recess.
Mayor Abramowitz reconvened the meeting and everyone who was in
attendance before was in attendance now.
C/M Schumann expressed an interest to put Section 7.13 on the
referendum. He said Section 7.13 reflected 2-1/2% on the general
fund to determine what constituted a current budget. City Attorney
Ruf said on October 29, 1991, he sent a draft of the proposed
Ordinance to Council.
V/M Bender said he agreed with C/M Schumann and C/M Katz said he
also agreed with V/M Bender. C/W Glasser said she agreed but there
were other issues which applied to next year.
C/M Schumann asked *f there were three separate ballots these
proposals could go on and Mayor Abramowitz said, yes. C/M Schumann
said some proposals could be put on hold.
Mayor Abramowitz asked City Manager Kelly if he had the time to
disseminate the information regarding Section 7.13 and City Manager
Kelly said, yes. Mayor Abramowitz said.information could also go in
the Tam -A -Gram.
Mr. Krantz said the issue of Section 7.13 was long overdue and Mr.
Winter said City Manager Kelly should make sure the information was
put in the newspapers for the public to read.
Mayor Abramowitz said as soon as possible he wanted the verbiage on
the proposed items which would go on referendum.
Mayor Abramowitz said after the holidays, a Special Meeting would be
scheduled for the Council to indicate their priority financial
items. He said he would make sure that the Charter Board received
copies.
City Manager Kelly asked if the meeting would be held the next time
around and Mayor Abramowitz said, yes.
Mayor Abramowitz said some people had priorities while others did
not and he felt it was worthwhile to sit down with the Charter Board
and discuss certain issues.
Mayor Abramowitz said in his opinion it would be extremely
beneficial to Council and the Charter Board if Attorney Novack
explained the language in the Ordinances he prepared.
Vice Chairwoman Kitograd said a first reading had to be held by
December 30 or 31 on any Ordinance changes. She asked if Council
had to meet before those dates for the first reading to take a
formalized vote and Mayor Abramowitz said a Special meeting could be
called with 12 hours notice.
Vice Chairwoman Kitograd said Council would have a Special meeting
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 8
where the verbiage would be presented for Council's approval and it
wou,ld.go to first reading and Mayor Abramowitz said, yes. City
Attorney Ru.f' said he did not see a need for this.
Mayor Abramowitz said the Special meeting was to have the verbiage
explained and not for Council to vote for or against. City Attorney
Ruf said he had not reviewed the Ordinances prepared by Attorney
Novack and Mayor Abramowitz asked Attorney Ruf to make this a
priority.
Vice Chairwoman Kitograd asked if the Special meeting would take
place by December 31. She said in the past, verbiage was
distributed an hour before there was a public reading. Mayor
Abramowitz said Council did not have to meet before December 31 to
have the first reading but he did want Attorney Novack to thoroughly
explain the verbiage.
Mayor Abramowitz said Council would perhaps have the first reading
by next week. Vice Chairwoman Kitograd asked if the first reading
was the reading of the verbiage and Mayor Abramowitz said, no. He
said the City was required to have two meetings and a public hearing
with a certain amount of time between the first and second public
hearings.
City Attorney Ruf said Attorney Novack had drafted the first five
issues and changes would be made regarding unlimited terms. He said
he prepared the proposal on Section 7.13 and would give a copy to
Attorney Novack.
Mayor Abramowitz said he would be more comfortable having Attorney
Novack explain the verbiage.
City Attorney Ruf said he would send the finished product to Council
and the Charter Board once both Attornies agreed on the verbiage.
C/W Glasser asked if Council and the Charter Board would address
the issues suggested by City Clerk Evans and Mayor Abramowitz said,
no. He said in his opinion they were not priorities.
Mayor Abramowitz said the Charter Board had not seen the
recommendations from City Clerk Evans and suggested a copy be given
to them. He said he wanted the Charter Board to be made aware of
some financial matters which concerned Council but Charter Board was
not involved in.
C/M Katz asked City Manager Kelly to advise what he considered the
City's priorities were. City Manager Kelly responded that the
financial aspects were a higher priority than terms of office and
length of the terms.
City Manager Kelly said the memo from City Clerk Evans with
assistance from Finance Director Blasi referred to the Capital Plan
and advertising and did affect the City in terms of cost. He said
they were more important than some of the other issues discussed
today.
Mayor Abramowitz said the voters had to be given the proper
information in order for them to know what they were voting for.
City Manager Kelly said several of the financial issues were easy to
sell because the voters would be able to save money and if Council
decided to wait for later elections, the financial issues would
impact on next years' budget. Mayor Abramowitz said he disagreed
with this theory.
C/W Glasser said the voters would be told that less money would be
spent instead of asking them to spend more money and they would
agree and Council's concern should be to save money for the City.
She said there was time until 1993 to discuss number of terms in
office and lengths of the terms.
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 9
Mayor Abramowitz said these were the issues brought up at the Joint
Council and Charter Board' meeting and priorities were discussed.
C/W Glasser said it was a priority but not necessarily to go on the
March ballot.
C/W Glasser said these were housekeeping factors and Mayor
Abramowitz said in his opinion, they should not be prioritized.
C/W Glasser said it was a priority because it would save money.
C/M Katz said Council should have approval on anything pertaining to
budget in July and he wanted as much information as he could before
next year's budget.
Mayor Abramowitz asked if Section 12.03 - Removal from office, would
save money and C/M Katz said, no.
C/W Glasser suggested asking everyone for a consensus of opinion and
Mayor Abramowitz said the Charter Board did not have a copy. City
Attorney Ruf said copies were being made.
-Mayor Abramowitz said it was unfair to ask the Charter Board for an
.mmediate answer when they did not have an opportunity to study the
issues. He said Council needed a decision immediately and it was
O.K. if Council did not want to put anything on the ballot. Mr.
Krantz said he thought a decision had been made and questioned why
was it being changed. Mayor Abramowitz said a decision had been
made but he did not know why it was being changed.
V/M Bender said nothing was being changed and C/W Glasser said she
agreed. Mayor Abramowitz said the Charter Board was being asked to
decide on something they knew nothing about.
Chairwoman Davis said she never saw the memo from City Clerk Evans
and C/M Katz said it was discussed at the last Joint Meeting. Mr.
Winter said no one from the Charter Board ever saw the memo before
today.
Mayor Abramowitz said Council and the Charter Board sat together for
three meetings and decided what the priorities were and the priority
was the length of terms. C/W Glasser said the memo from City Clerk
Evans should also have been distributed to the Charter Board for
discussion.
Tape 3
Mr. Winter said his notes from a prior meeting indicated C/M Katz's
priorities were terms of office, Section 7.13, expenses and
compensation, redistricting and capital improvements. He said C/W
Glasser's priorities were terms of office and vouchers; V/M Bender's
priorities were terms of office and capital improvements.
Mr. Winter said he did not remember these ever being brought up and
C/W Glasser said they were. V/M Bender said they were brought up at
a Workshop. Mr. Winter said the Charter Board did not attend the
Workshop because no one from the Charter Board received a copy of
the memo.
C/M Katz said he brought up these issues for discussion at the last
Joint Meeting. He said it should be addressed before the next
budget. Mayor Abramowitz said he asked each person at the last
Joint Meeting what their priorities were and Chairwoman Davis she
the members of the Charter Board did not hear the question.
C/M Katz said one of his concerns was an item indicated by City
Clerk Evans and Mr. Winter said C/M Katz did not state this was a
priority.
C/W Glasser asked if everything had to be finalized today or could
it be finalized by January 2 and City Attorney Ruf said January 6
was the last date that City Clerk Evans could advertise the second
reading.
Mayor Abramowitz asked when the first reading would take place and
Joint Workshop Meeting
City Council and Charter Board
12/18/91/PP
Page 10
City Attorney Ruf said it had to be prior to January 6 because the
second reading was January 16. He said this would be sufficient for
the 10 days notice and C/W Glasser was correct with the January 2
date but City Clerk Evans wanted it as early as possible.
Mayor Abramowitz said he had no problem with the dates and City
Manager Kelly said Council could have a Special Meeting on December
30 and a Joint Meeting on December 31. Mayor Abramowitz said he had
no problems with December 30 and 31.
Melanie Reynolds, resident, expressed her concerns about her
priorities.
Joseph Schreiber, resident, expressed his concerns about the $100
compensation and what else was involved for the Charter Board.
Mayor Abramowitz adjourned the Joint Meeting at 11:45 a.m.
CAROL A. EVANS
CITY CLERK
LJ