HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-88-071Temp. Reso. #t4972
Revised 3/10/88
1
2
3
4
M
4
10
11
12
13
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
33
34
35
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-88-2�—
A RESOLUTION ISSUING DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO.
234 FOR VISUAL GRAPHICS PARK FOR FERGUSON
PLUMBING/CLAIRSON MANUFACTURING PROJECT FOR
A REVISED SITE PLAN PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 7-2 THROUGH 7-11 OF
THE TAMARAC CODE; AND PROVIDING AN
EEE_CT IYE_D-�E-1 -
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City
Council of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been
advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date,
time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the
application for a development order by the applicant for
development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the development order
and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
application is in compliance with all elements of the
Comprehensive Plan, or, will be in compliance prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development
that is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC; FLORIDA:
SECTION Ai That, the application for approval of a
revised site plan for Visual Graphics Park, prepared by
Architect John Evans, revised on February 25, 1988,
reflecting the addition of Ferguson Plumbing/Clairson
Manufacturing, is HEREBY APPROVED subject to the following
conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with
the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to
the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the
Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering
drawings.
01
1
2
3
4
oil
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
9
20
21
`&A
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
33
34
35
Temp. Reso. #4972
Revised 3/10/88
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer
than one year from the date of this approval. If the
development does not commence construction within one year,
this approval is null and void unless an extension has been
granted in accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict
compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to
modify any of the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the revised development order are set forth as follows:
1. The Engineering, Fire Department and Building Department
must be satisfied that all codes are upheld and some
system set up for water, fire department and potable
water. The issuance of Certificates of Occupancy are
solely the province of plans, inspections and approval
of Building and Fire Departments as administrators of
the SFBC.
2. Fire lanes to be posted and striped per City Code.
3. Reflectorized pavement markings to be installed per
Tamarac Fire Department and Tamarac Utilities West
specifications.
4. Sprinkler system to comply with NFPA 13 and/or 231C and
be verified prior to CO issuance.
5. All developments shall have available a public fire
protection water supply system.
6. See attached memo dated 2/19/88 from Director of
Utilities/Engineering.
7. An overall landscape plan shall be submitted to the City
within ninety (90) days; however no Certificate of
Occupancy shall be issued until a landscape plan has
been approved by the City.
SECTION 2; Should any section or provision of this
development order be declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine
if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether
the approval shall be null and void.
K
1
Fa
3
4
w
_J
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
32
33
34
35
Temp. Reso. I4U2
Revised 3/10/88
31U QN-3y This development order as conditioned shall
become effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 9 day of , 1988.
11�2- -2 ''/
ATTEST: -11J/
CAROL E. BARBUTO
CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
approved this RESOLUTION as to
form.
wa _
RICHARD DO
CITY ATTORN
BERNARD HART
MAYOR
MAYOR: HART
DIST. 1: C/M ROHR-
DIST. 2: C/M STELZER ��-�----
DIST. 3: C/M HOFFMAN ..--
DIST. 4: V/M STEIN _ --
3
R-, kP-, 71 ,
5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE 0 TAMARAC. FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722.5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMO #
DATE 3/2/88
Revised Site Plan for VISUAL GRAPHICS PARK for 234 e. Dev. Order
"�evisi5ed Dev. Order
Project FERGUSON PLUMBING/CLAIRSON MANUFACTURING Master File # 68-77
Location NW corner Commercial Blvd and NW 94 Ave.
Developer Hopkins Easton No. 11 Ltd.
Owner Ho kins Easton No. 11 LTd.
Zoning LI-1 Acres Recommended Date for Council Action 3/9/88
Future Land Use Designation Industrial Proposed UseIndustrial
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES:
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Building Official
Fire Chief
Comments
Final Plat Revised Site Plan X
Final Site Plan _ Final PlatRevised Site Plan
II. PLA►4NING COMMISSI0N REM.,riENDATIONS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date DENIAL/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated Rev
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
* 'III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS:
APPROVAL/Date I APPROVAL AS REDLINED/pate - DENIAL/Date
Comments
cont'd
IR, FF - 7/
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN:
Staff Action APPROVAL — APPROVAL WITH CMIDITIONS DENIAL _
Date 0
V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPME4T REVIEW COM14ITTEE REPORT:
If app icab e r
Comments
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable : S U M M A R Y W //44
A. Water and Sewer Developer A reem n
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Develo2Tent A regiment (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount $
5% Required/Acres Provided
Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount $
Project Acreage X $130/Acre
E. Water b Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount S
Number of ERCs X $1000
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount S
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount S
Acres Required Provided
$/Acre X Deficiency/Acres
H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount $
I. Bonds Bond Amount $ .�
Date: Approved by City Engineer_— City Attorney ._..,
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
• page S Meno 0
Pw AT REVIEW STATUS SwriT -
Dc ;rr10 E
Dry mpmrsi REVIEW Rr UltrMENTS:
A. Potjt1e k'eter Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE...— WILL BE MILABLE .,._. — NOT AVAILABLC ..,._..�
Dote ceement$
\f. wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE _...,.'.�..� WILL It AVAILABLE .. — NOT AVAILABLE
Date CeRment$
C. Solid waste Disposal Service -
Dttermination of Availability of Service:
AYAILAbLF
'� WILL BE AVAILABLE ^,.,� NOT AVAILABLE
�,_
t Date Coaments
dEEb
p, Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Cnginter or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of.Drainage:
ADEQUATE.,. WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAUTE
Date tcnnents
C. R n ional Transy tation Netvork
Cor.,;fiance wit minirlim Standards:
COMPLIES WILL tW,,PLY.._...— DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F. Local Streets an Roads
compliance wit iinim,m, Standards:
COF,PLIES... WILL C(XIPLY.,.-... — DOES NOT tO"iPLY
Date Cormentt
Fire Protection Service
Cex-,plianet with Minimam Standards:
COMPLIES.-....�— WILL COMPLY --� DOES NOT CmjP1Y �—
Date Cerment$
M. Police Protect on Service
Compliance with Minimim Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Ce ment$
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities)
ana :�catlon Req+�iredlAcres - Provided
Cash 1n Lieu of Land... Dross Acres &a. x $—. /AC • S
Lor..pl iance with the Standards of the froward County School Board' �--
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NDT Nr
« « « « MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
• • KISH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated �`
Page 4 � -'r' 7/
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
V111. PROCESSING FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: S
•Revised Site Plan: 3 400.00 + 250.00
Plat Review: S
Sthernatic Lny.: �
Other: s
STAFF COti ZNTS:
Proposed development is/is not in general conformance with Tormarac't Lend
Use Plan Element and recamnends:
Adoption of Development Order # 234 Master File # 68-77 For:
FERGUSON PLUMBING/CLAIRSON MANUFACTURING at VGC PARK Revised Site Plan
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions:
Staff recommends approval of the revised site plan for the two tenants
in the Visual Graphics building, subject to the following:
1. The Engineering, Fire Department and Building Department must be
satisfied that all codes are upheld and some system set up for
water, fire department and potable water. The issuance of
certificates of occupancy are solely the province of plans, inspections
and approval of Building and Fire Departments as administrators of the
SFBC.
2. Fire lanes to•be posted and striped per City Code.
3. RPM's to be installed per Tamarac Fire Department and Tamarac Utilities
West specifications.
4. Sprinkler system to comply with NFPA 13 and/or 231C and be verified
prior to CO issuance.
5. All developments shall have available a public fire protection water
supply system.
6. See attached memo dated 2/19/88 from Director of Utilities/Engineering
L.
A�, d�k- 7 j
C I T Y O F T A M A R A C
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8802-4620
E88-562
TO: Thelma Brown --Porter,
Director of Community Development.
FROM: William H. Greenwood, Director of
Utilities/Engineering
SUBJECT: VISUAL GRAPHICS - SITE PLAN APPROVAL
DATE: February 19, 1988
COPIES:
On reviewing the two (2) drawings for the Ferguson and
Clairson Projects that are being proposed for the Visual
Graphics site, the curb cuts and turning lanes must be
removed from the proposed Site Plans before being submitted
to Council.
Attached are meeting/field report from DeRose and Slope for
meetings held on February 9, 1988 and February 10, 1988.
These reports have been marked with Engineering comments.
Please note that the Lake Maintenance Easement dedication and
Public Safety Easement dedication listed under I and 2 of the
report or meeting of February 9, 1988 was not received until
February 18, 1988. These documents have been re -written and
will have to be reviewed in detail by Engineering and by the
City Attorney. They are "on -site" Easements and are not
necessary for Site Plan approval but must be executed before
a C.O. is issued.
'RKJ:mw
Attachment
r,-7
L.J
WiT FqmR. C re wood,
Director of U ilities/Engineering