HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-86-097Introduced by: (_2/'W Temp. Reso. #4070
Rev. 3/25/86
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-86- 9 7 _
A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER
NO. 176-1 FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN FOR MIDWAY
PLAZA; ANDwPROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATES_
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of
Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accor-
dance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meet-
ing regarding the review of the application for a revised develop-
ment order by the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the
application and staff recommendations; and the attached Development
Review Status Sheet dated 3/20/86 ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development
order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application
is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan, or
will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for the development that is the subject of the applica-
tion.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAM-
ARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTIQN 1: That the application for approval of a revised site
plan for Midway Plaza, revised 3/19/86 to reflect an
adjustment in the Publix parking lot dimensions, is approved
subject to the following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the
plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of
Tamarac as described in Section 11 of the Development Review Status
Sheet.
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one
year from the date of this approval. If the development does not
commence construction within one year, this approval is null and
void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with appli-
cable regulations.
1
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
1S
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
-c6
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Temp. Reso. #4070
Rev. 3/25/86
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance
with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of
the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the
revised development order are set forth as follows:
/V ON
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised
development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other
portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be
null and void.
ECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned
shall become effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED thisz'2&day of :, 1986.
ATTEST:
f'X..'l k�_t�z
CITY qAERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
approved the form and correct-
ness of this RESOLUTION..
MAYOR:
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
MAYOR
RECORD OF COUNT VOTE
2
0
•
je-
seii NDATNWEST 98TH AVENUE • iAMARAC. FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE 130S) 722-5e00
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMO N �
DATE 3/20/86
Orig. Div, Order
REVISED SITE PLAN FOR MIDWAY PLAZA for 17�L�vised Dev, Order
REVISED SETBACKS FOR PUBLIX MARKET
Project _�.._..___.._.,._ Paster file # 11-84
Location* NW cornerUniversityDr and NW 57 St.
Developer PROPERTY SYSTEM, INC.
Owner PROPERTY SYSTEM, INC.
Zoning Acres22•8 Recommended Date for Council Action 3/26/86
Future Land Lisp Designation, Commercial al Proposed Use shopping plaza
DEVELOPMENT DRDER FOR:
Final Site Plan
1. STAFF APPROVAL DATES:
City Planner
City Ennineer
Chief Eu4ldina Official
Fire _:lief
Finance Director
Final Plat —`__ Revised Site plan ._"_
Final Site Plan Final Plat _Revised Site Plan
ii. PLA'4NIN" CD'"'�15510�a RrE�.i ;E►�DA"EIOyS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL V,ITH CO"IDITIOtlS/Date 3/TD786- DE"'1wL/DFte
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated_ Rev
Planning Connission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
See Page 4 of this report
1111. FINAL MINEERINS DR4:'INOS:
APPROVAL/Date KPPRDVAL AS REDLIMFD; Date DE%'34/4"Iate
Comments
tont'd
V S'VC
DrULMIENT REVIEW STAT�A- SHEET
eIV. LAtiaSCOE PLAN:
It&" Action APPRDYAL APPRO AL WITH CONDITIDUS. DE'JIAL
Da to
feautification Corr.tttee Reco^rendatiorn-Dete:
APPROVAL APPADVAL WITH CDVDITIDNS DEQAL,..
V. IRDVAPD COU'1TY DEVELOP�IEYT REVIEW CI'!NITTEE REPORT: 0 to
if aJaA CA
e
• Comments
,*V;7S1TEES (wore applicable): S V N M A R Y
A. Water rid Se.,ler-Develpper-AgreMU.1%.
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney :Approval/Date
B. Other_ Developmert Aare == (Covenants. Stipulations. etc.)
C. Dreinnot Pete, vcr, Fee AmDunt S
St Required/Acres Provided
Deficiency/Acres X S33,000/Acre
D. Drainage lmproyrnent Fee Amount S
Project Acreage X S130/Acre
E. water i Sewer Cyntrit�;:j= Charges Fee Amount S
NLnber of ERCs X S1510
F. ERC Review Fee, if Bore than 10 ERCs Fee Amount S
6. Local Perks/Recreation Fee Amount S
Acres Required _..� Provided
/AcreX MM.0,,,,MMME� Deficiency/Acres
H. Enoinerring Fees Fee Amount S
1. Jonds bond Amount S
Date: Approved by City Engineer----. City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid it time of building permit issuance)
Cont'd
i
- Page 3' Memo #
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SWEET
DrVEL0P11rNT REVIEW RE VIREMENTS:
A. Potatle Water Service
Certification o City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability opervite:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE ...,� NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B. Wastewater Treatm nt and Disposal Service
Certification of ity Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of ervice:
AVAILABLE .—,,,-..,_ WILL BE AVAILABLE.. NOT AVAILABLE .r..�
Date Comments
C. Solid waste Disp sal Service
Determination o Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE... NOT AVAILABLE �..�
Date Comments
D. Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of Drainage:
ADEQUATE . WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADFQAUTE
Date Comments
E. Regional Transpor ation Network
Compliance with inimum Standards:
COMPLIES._ WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments •
F. Local Streets and ADads
Compliance with .inimum Standards:
COMPLIES_...,. L WILL COMPLY—..... DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
6. Fire Protection Ser ce
Compliance with imum Standards:
COMPLIES �,_ WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
N. Police Protectio Service
Compliance wtwMinium Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Loral Perks (Parks and Recreation Facilities)
101 and citation Required/Acres Provided
Cash in Lieu of land . Gross Acres Max. x ;,,,._.__ /AC • i �--
a•
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
« " " MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED �d
" w " NIS"iH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated .,,�
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
i
Vill. PRXESSINS FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: i
Revised Site Plan: 400.00
Plat Review: S
Schematic Eng.:
Other:
STAFF CDh'P'.EKTS:
Proposed development isli in general conformance with Tamarac's Land
use Plan Element and recend~s:
Adoption of Development Order ! 176-1 Pester File d for:
REVISED
PUBLIX MARKET .�
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions:
Staff recommends Council approval of the revised site plan.
*I