The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-82-023Introduced by (.t� �� Temp. Reso. #2148 Rev. 1/27/82 1 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA 2 RESOLUTION PIO. 3 A RESOLUTION ISSUING AN AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE RICHWAY AT TAMARAC PROJECT. DEVEIAP_MENT ORDER NO. 1-81 4 REVISED: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable 7 law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the applica- 8 tion for an amanded development order by the applicant (revised site plan approval 9 sought); and 20 WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, 11 staff and Planning Commission recommendations, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated' 1/20/82 and 32 13 WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the development order and accompanying .24 documents at a public meeting; and 35 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in can- 16 Pliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior .7 to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development that s is the subject of the application. 9 Nag, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, - -'20 FLORIDA: . 21 SECTION l: That the development described on the attached development 22 review status sheet dated 1/20/82 is granted < an amended development order to 23 proceed subject to the following conditions: 24 A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and spec- 25 ifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section 26 II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. 27 B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than -one year from the 38 date of original approval. If the development does not commence construction within 29 one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted.in 30 accordance with applicable regulations. C. The development order is assignable, but an assignment does not dis- 32 charge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council 33 consents to modify any of the original requirements. 34 D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the development 35 order are set forth following: Temp. Reso. #2148 1 2 3 4 5 7I 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1R 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 SITE PLAN 1. Site Plan submitted to Council with site plan revisions showing future driveway to Parcel A with wording acceptable to the City Attorney. 2. Landscape plans submitted to Council with site plan including additions to new area in front of garden center. 3. The top soil, landscaping and Bahia sodding on the median on 82nd Street. 4. Remove Note 12 of the Revised Site Plan and the language on Parcel "A" stating "area of future ingress and egress". 5. The handicapped parking amended on the plan to show 6 spaces. 6. This project is subject to compliance with Beautification Committee recommen- dations dated 1/25/82. 7. Extend curb across the North Driveway to prevent entrance into property; to include a "No Entrance" sign. 8. Place a 'No Right Turn" sign at the west exit on N.W. 82nd Street and remove the exit arrow from the revised site plan, extend the curb across the driveway to prevent right turn and the area adjacent to it should be bermed so as not to obstruct vision, but to prevent anyone from making a right-hand turn. 9. Relocation of any utilities shall be the developers responsibility. SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3: This development order as conditioned shall become effective immediately upon its final passage. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this o27day of 1982. ATTEST: _ ASSISTANT CITY CIERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved 33 the form and correctness of this RESOLUTION 34 35 36 CITY ATTORNEY MAYOR: DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE 3 g�4 5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE 0 TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321 TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900 nFVFIOPMFNT REVIEW STATUS SHEET MEMO # DATE 77W82 Orig. Dev. Order _Revised Dev. Order Project RICHWAY AT TAMARAC _ Master File # Location West side University South of Don Carter's Bowling Lanes Developer Federated Department Stores, Inc. _ Owner Zoning B-2 Acres 11.1885 Recommended Date for Council Action 1/27/82 Future Land Use Designation Commercial Proposed Use Commercial DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: Final Site Plan Final Plat I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final Site Plan City Planner City Engineer Chief Building Official Fire Chief Comments 'II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOiiENDATIONS: Revised Site Plan ___ X____. Final Plat X Revised Site Plan APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date 1/20/82 DENIAL/Date Final Site Plan dated Rev Final Plat dated Rev Revised Site Plan dated l.4s/S2_ Rev ,1 /20/82 Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan: III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS: APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date 1/18/82 DENIAL/Date Comments cont'd Page 2 , DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL Date 1/24/82 Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: 1/24/82 APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT: -Date 1041-5,482 If applicable Comments VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement City Engineer Approval/Date 10114 81 City Attorney Approval/Date mica/M— B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount $ 18,515..00 (paid) 5% Required/Acres ` .529 ac. Provided -0c Deficiency/Acres .529 ac. X $35,000/Acre D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount R 1,375.40 (paid) Project Acreage 10.58 X $130/Acre E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges 'cumber of ERCs inter 13 X $1000 sewer 8 F. ERC Review Fee, if mor' than 10 ERCs G. Local Parks/Recreation Acres Required Provided Fee Amount $ 9.750.00 (paid) ($350.00 per ERC) ($650.00 per ERC) 500.00 (paid) Fee Amount $ Fee Amount $ $/Acre X Deficiency/Acres H. Engineering Fees NA Fee Amount $ $38,564.98 I. Bonds Bond Amount $197,100. Date: Approved by City Engineer 1/21/82 City Attorney cont'd Page 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAT Memo # DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: A. Potable Water Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE Y,___- WILL BE AVAILABLE _____ NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE _.—_ NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments C. Solid Waste Disposal Service Determination of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE _ WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE _---- Date Comments D. Drainage Adequacy Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage: ADEQUATE _ . _ _ WILL BE ADEQUATE _ _ — _..._ NOT ADEQAUTE -- Date Comments E. Regional Transportation Network Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY X DOES NOT COMPLY - Date Comments F. Local Streets and Roads Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES. X WILL C01.1PLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments G. Fire Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY X DatjO/9/81 Comments H. Police Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY Date 10/7/81 Comments DOES NOT COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) NA Land Dedication Required/Acres - Provided Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC J. School Sites Comp1'iance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NA NOT NEEDED " MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED Letter from School Board Dated cont'd Page 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID): Site Plan Review: $ 1.566.98 . (mid)._ Revised Site Plan: $ 175_00 (nab,__ Plat Review: $ 298.QQ._(paid), Schematic Eng.: $ 450.00 (paid) _ Other: VACATION R/O/W $ 25.Q0 __Ipaid)- STAFF COMMENTS: Proposed development is/is not in general conformance with Tamarac's Land Use Plan Element and recommends: Adoption of Development Order # ReTvi sed Master File # 8-81 For: BT- Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following conditions: 1. Site Plan babe submitted to Council with site plan revisions showing future driveway to Parcel A with wording acceptable to the City Attorney. 2. Landscape plans submitted to Council with site plan including additions to new area in front of garden center.