HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Ordinance O-1982-0251
2
3
10
11
17
13
14
16
7
13
20
21
22
23
24
25
.,
7
,0
31
32
33
34
35
36
Introduced by: Temp. #965 Rev. 2/18/82
CITY OFT NARAC, FLORIDA 3/24/82
ORDINANCE NO. Q— -pz�fi
FLORIDA:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7-9 OF THE TAMARAC CITY CODE
PERTAINING TO TIME LIMITS FOR COMMENCEMENT OF WORK AFTER
SITE PLAN APPROVAL BY PROVIDING THAT ENGINEERING PERMITS
TO BE PULLED MUST BE FOR SOMETHING OTHER THAN CLEARING OR
GRUBBING; AMENDING SECTION 7-10 OF THE CITY CODE
PERTAINING TO REVISED SITE PLANS BY MODIFYING REVIEW,
PROCEDURES FOR IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED PRIOR TO ANNEXATION
AND PRIOR TO AUGUST 11, 1972; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATON;
PROVIDING REPEALER; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY OF INVALID
PROVISIONS: AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC,
SECTION 1: Section 7-9 of the Tamarac City Code is amended to
read as follows:
SECTION 7-9 TIME LIMIT FOR FINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLANS AND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS APPROVED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL.
Following the City Council's review and approval of the final site
development plan, and issuance of a Development Order for either the
complete project or for an approved phase of such project, there shall be a
one-year limit in which the developer shall take out the first engineering
(other than clearing or grubbing) or building permits. Computation of the
one year for final site plans including those approved with conditions shall
begin on the date the council approves the final site plan. Failure to take
out the first building or engineering (other than clearing or grubbing)
permit within the time limit shall automatically cause the final site
development plan to become null and void. If an applicant seeks to revise
a site plan during the one year subsequent to final site plan approval, the
one year period during which permits shall be taken out shall be computed
from the date of initial Final Site Plan approval unless otherwise
determined by Council.
1
1
2
3
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
16
7
15
20
21
22
23
24
25
.0
31
32
33
35
36
If the developer expects to exceed the one-year time limit, he
may, prior, to the expiration of the one year, apply to the City for an
extension of the time and shall submit his reasons for not obtaining the
permit within one year of the site plan approval in writing. He shall be
required to pay a fee for this application,in an amount established by
Resolution of the City Council. The Planning Commission shall evaluate the
site development plan in question, along with the developer's reasons for an
extension and it shall also consider the current development regulations.
The Planning Commission shall then make its recommendation to the City
Council. The City Council shall consider the recommendations of the
Planning Commission and shall take action on the application by approving
it, approving it with conditions or denying it.
When the City evaluates the development review criteria for a plat
that is not processed simultaneously with a site plan for the same project,
or for any other application for a development permit prior to site plan
consideration,a finding that the development review criteria set forth,
herein has been satisfied shall not preclude the City from making a separate
and independent review for compliance with development review criteria at
the time of site plan review and subsequent stages of development.
Furthermore, if one year or more has elapsed from the time of an
initial finding that the development review criteria has been met and a plat
has not been recorded, or work for which a permit is required (other than
clearing or grubbing) has not commenced on a project, the Council may
require a de novo review of the development review criteria by it before any
permit may be issued by the city for any work on the property or the
granting an extension of the time period for which a site plan is viable.
SECTION 2: Section 7-10 of the Tamarac City Code is amended to
read as follows:
SECTION 7-10 PROCEDURES FOR AMENDING DEVELOPMENT
ORDERS AND REVISING SITE DEVELOPMENT
PLANS
Where a site development plan has been previously approved by the
City Council and is proposed to be revised in any manner, either by the
0
1
2
3
°7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1'
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
"D
31
32
35
36
developer or the County, the revision proposed shall be first submitted to
the Planning Commission for review and then to the City Council for
approval, prior to the issuance of any permits. However, wnere the total
building coverage or parking requirements are not increased and vehicular
circulation is not changed, the submission may be directly to the City
Council.
The applicant shall submit the following documents to the City
prior to receiving review by the Planning Commission and City Council.
1. New Application Form.
2. Proper fees.
3. Proposed Revision included on 10 copies of the Original
Approved Site Plan.
A. The Plan shall be titled - REVISED.
B. The Revision shall be clearly designated on the
drawing properly sealed and signed and the description
of all changes shall be noted in the ti tl a block.
C. The City may require additional detailed information
to assist in reviewing the Application.
Where an improvement to land which would require site plan approval
has been completed prior to the property on which it is located being
annexed into the City, or where an improvement to land which would require
site plan approval has been completed prior to August 11, 1972, a document
entitled revised site plan and showing the existing condition of the
property and proposed changes shall be processed in the same manner as set
r
forth in the preceeding two paragraphs. All changes shall conform to the
ordinances and regulations in effect when the changes are made.,
SECTION 3: Specific authority is hereby granted to codify this
ordinance.
SECTION 4: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 5: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or
any portion thereof, or any paragraph, sentence or word be declared by a
Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not
M
1
2
3
7
8
'1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
7'
.L3
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
,0
31
32
33
34
35
36
affect the validity of the remainder hereof as a whole or any part hereof,
other than the part declared to be invalid.
SECTION 6: This Ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon its final passage.
PASSED FIRST READING this�Ay of _ _ , 1982.
PASSED. SECOND READING this_i`"day-of 1982.
MAYOR
VV
ATTEST:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
approved the form and correctness
of this ORDINANCE
4.
MAYOR.
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
1XSTPJCT
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE