HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-09-18 - City Commission Workshop Meeting MinutesL�
1
MAIL REPLY TO:
P.O. BOX 25010
TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33320
5811 NORTHWEST 887#1 AVENUE & TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900
September 13,1985
NOTICE OF BUDGET WORKSHOP MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
TAMARAC, FLORIDA
There has been a City Council Workshop Meeting scheduled for
Wednesday, Se tember 18 1985, at 10:00 A.M. in the front of
the Council Cham ers of C ty Hall, 5811 NW 88th Avenue, for
continued review of Proposed Budgets for Fiscal Year 1985/86.
The public is invited to attend.
�F> kew- �-'
Carol Z. Barbuto
Assistant city Clerk
AN EOUAL OPPORTUNTTY'EMPLOYER
POLICY OF NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF HANDICAPPED STATUS
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
REVIEW OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FY 1985/86
SEPTEMBER 18, 1985
Tape CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Philip B. Kravitz called the meeting to
1 order on Wednesday, September 18, 1985, at 10:50 A.M. in Council
Chambers. Mayor Kravitz stated the purpose of the workshop was the
continued review of proposed budgets for Fiscal Year 1985/86.
ROLL_ CALL
PRESENT: Mayor Philip B. Kravitz
Vice Mayor Helen Massaro
Councilman Arthur H. Gottesman
Councilman Raymond J. Munitz
ABSENT: Councilman Sydney M. Stein
ALSO PRESENT: Larry Perretti, Acting City Manager
Jon Henning, City Attorney
V. Diane Williams, Secretary
MEDITATION AND PLEDGE GF_ALLBgIAAL: Mayor Kravitz called for a
Moment of Silent Meditation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mr. Richard Kip, Manager of Corporate and External Affairs of
Southern Bell, 8601 West Sunrise Boulevard, Plantation, Florida,
stated his purpose in attending the meeting was to share with
Council information on options available to municipalities regard-
ing tax on telecommunication service. He said municipalities have
had limited options in the past which essentially revolved around a
franchise fee on the telephone company for the right to do business
within the City. Mr. Kip said the City of Tamarac has a 1% fran-
chise fee which yields approximately $37,000 annually and is
payable each year in September but the City has no municipal excise
tax on telephone service. He said, however, that prior to July,
1985 State law provided a range under that taxing option of from
zero to ten percent and informed that most cities in Broward have
opted to take that tax and are taxing at various rates within the
allowed range.
Mr. Kip said this year's Florida Legislature passed. House Bill 1340
which provides additional options for both the State and municipal-
ities in regard to tax on telecommunication service; he said this
law was very broad but he wanted to highlight a few of the options
which pertain to municipal services. He said the law essentially
retained the original option on local exchange telephone service
on a range of zero to ten percent but in addition the law also gave
municipalities the option of taxing on a range from zero to seven
percent on the local monthly recurring revenue as well as intra-
state toll calls. Mr. Kip said many municipalities are exploring
those avenues and the revenue alternatives that would be resultant,
and he indicated that Southern Bell had made studies regarding what
those two,alternatives would lead to in August if they were in ef-
fect within the City.
Mr. Kip stated if the City had a 10% City tax on local exchange
service effective August, the net tax revenue paid to the City by
Southern Bell would be $31,815 monthly. Mr. Kip defined "local
exchange service" as the monthly recurring revenue for the line,
touch tone service and custom calling which is essentially covered
in the monthly bill. He said under the new option to tax both
local exchange service and toll intrastate on a range of zero to
seven percent, if the maximum seven percent had been in effect, the
resulting tax revenue from Southern Bell would have been $29,064.99
which is based on an manual compilation of revenues.
Mr. Kip pointed out under the second option, which included the
ability to tax intrastate toll, that Southern Bell is one of many
1
9/18/85
/vdw
long distance carriers and their long distance market in Florida is
essentially from Key West to Vero Beach. He said Southern Bell
does not serve statewide but stated that there were approximately
46 long distance companies in the State who do. Mr. Kip said that
second option would entitle the City to tax intrastate toll calls
provided by all companies doing business in the State who are
providing service to customers in the City of Tamarac.
Mr. Kip said Southern Bell has no position with regard to either
the first or the second option and stated if it were their choice,
they would prefer not to have any tax on telecommunication service
in excess of any other essential service.
C/M Munitz asked the taxing situation prior to the breakup of
AT&T. Mr. Kip responded that prior to January 1, 1984 when the
Bell System was restructured, the local exchange revenue included
any charges for leased or rented telephone sets; in other words,
all the telecommunications terminal equipment from the individual
set in the home to the most sophisticated of business systems, if
leased on a monthly basis, that monthly revenue would have been
taxable under the first and only option at the time which was of
the range from zero to ten percent. He explained that when dives-
titure occurred in January 1, 1984, municipalities who had a
municipal excise tax in effect experienced a rather substantial
decline in revenue when the equipment rental was no longer taxable
as it instantly transferred to the ownership of AT&T. Mr. Kip
estimated the loss of revenue to the municipalities as a result of
this was approximately 25% to 40% depending on each municipality.
C/M Munitz asked if the residents would be paying more to the City
of Tamarac compared to what they were paying prior to the divesti-
ture of AT&T. Mr. Kip said there was never a municipal excise tax
in Tamarac; however, he stated that the 1% franchise fee paid an-
nually covered local exchange revenue but the figures were very,
very minor.
C/M Gottesman asked for a definition of "local exchange". Mr. Kip
answered that "local exchange" is the City's local toll free
calling area but added in the sense of revenue, he was referring to
the monthly recurring charges for the telephone line, touch tone,
etc. Mr. Kip said under the second option intrastate would include
any call made to or from any point in the State of Florida and
billed to a Tamarac resident. C/M Gottesman asked the tax situa-
tion regarding out-of-state calls. Mr. Kip said the interstate or
out-of-state calls are only taxable at the Federal level not to the
State nor municipalities so the only concern would be for calls
within the State of Florida.
V/M Massaro asked who would be billing the City for the two op-
tions. Mr. Kip explained that the first option to tax on local
exchange revenues would be only a tax on Southern Bell's customers
since they are the only ones providing local exchange service. He
said Southern Bell would be the only taxpayer. Mr. Kip stated that
the second option would include everyone who is in the long-
distance business and Southern Bell would bill the customer. He
exampled that if the City chose the second option to tax on a range
of from zero to seven percent on local service and toll calls that
rate would apply to local service provided by Southern Bell.
Mr. Kip said one other item in this bill that would be of interest
to Council would be the effective date of implementation. He said
State law provides a 120 day effective date from the passage of the
bill to the billing of the tax and that is to provide all the com-
panies involved sufficient time to develop the billing mechanism.
Mr. Perretti stated that Option #2 has already been included in the
proposed budget and he recommended.this option to Council.
UTILITIES
Mayor Kravitz asked Frank Etheredge, Finance Director, to explain
under Regular Salaries - 120, how they can spend more than was
allotted in the budget. Mr. Etheredge answered that people were
2
9/18/85
/vdw
hired who were not authorized by Council or they were authorized by
Council but Council never approved a budget transfer. Mayor Kravitz
asked what was the need of a budget if people were going to act as
if it did not exist. Mr. Etheredge said if it was left up to him
this will not happen in this calendar year because the department
heads will be held to the line items. He said this coming year
will be hard and department heads may get to the eighth month and
be completely out of money.
Mayor Kravitz asked if the City anticipated spending $313,000 and
the proposed budget was $403,000
and recommended by the manager
$355,000, why was the salary increasing by that much.
Mr. Etheredge answered there were some people shifted and salary
increases were built in. Mayor Kravitz
said he was very concerned
with the overall proposed budget. Mr. Etheredge said it was not an
increase in cost to the
City but a transfer of costs from one divi-
sion to another. V/M Massaro
stated that Bill Greenwood, Utilities
Director, had indicated that it might be
worthwhile to consider a
reduction in meter readers and instead of reading the meters as
often
as the City does, he suggested the use of an estimate invoice
read quarterly. The Acting City Manager
said they are in the pro-
cess of revising the job description now and the meter readers will
have more diversified duties
than just reading meters.
Mr. Perretti explained that they will now be under the direction of
Field Superintendent, Bob
Woelke, and will be given additional
duties because it was learned that the meter reader's
day-to-day
operation was not basically a full-time operation.
Mayor Kravitz said he understood that originally the charges to
Finance were incorrect and should have been charged to the Water
Utility and that what Mr. Etheredge is doing now, in effect, is
taking it out of Finance and charging it to the Water Utility.
Mr. Etheredge stated that he has a division within the Water
Utility for the billings, collections, customer service and the
meter readers were there and were being paid out of the Utility
Fund. He said he was transferring control of the meter readers to
Bill Greenwood.
Bob Woelke, Field Superintendent/Utilities West, reported that the
meter readers will be transferred to Account #364 - Transmission
Distribution which deals strictly with water transmission, measure-
ment and so on. V/M Massaro asked the duties of the meter readers.
Mr. Woelke said the meter readers' duties included a number of
things that the meter readers have not been doing and if they do
their jobs properly, it will take eight hours a day. He said they
have only been reading the meters but their job also includes
keeping the meter boxes clean; occasionally, they will have to
replace meter box outlets and the meter box. Mr.
ke
will cross -train the meter readers and, consequently,
on said they
he
meter reader positions can be eliminated. He said ifone ooftthe
regular meter readers was out sick, another could substitute.
Mr. Woelke stated that this is a very important job as it provides
the income for utilities.
Mayor Kravitz questioned who did the cleaning and repair work of
the meters before if it was not the meter reader. Mr. Woelke
answered no one had been performing this task on a regular basis.
A field crew would go out every once in a while when the situation
became impossible; he said because of the failure to maintain the
meters it resulted in misreads and guessing because they did not
want to get down into the mud and these things would not continue
to be tolerated because it was not fair to the customers nor the
utility.
Mr. John Taribo, Superintendent of Plant Operations, said the
meter readers were performing these duties when the City took over
and then they became part of administration, under Finance, and it
got to the point where the meter readers would only go out and
read.
Mr. Etheredge said there was a backlog of meters to be replaced.
V/M Massaro asked why they were not required to do this.
3
9/18/85 }
/vdw J
Mr. Woelke replied that the replacement of meters had not been
included in the previous budget. He said the replacement of meters
is an ongoing program which required the full time of a couple of
people which meant that any meter over ten years old should be
replaced. He said if it were not replaced, in his experience with
testing meters, the City stands to lose at least 2 1/2% of their
total revenue which would include water and sewer because the water
directly affects the sewer bills. Mr. Woelke estimated approxi-
mately 8800 meters would have to be replaced and the revenue saved
by the City due to the replacement was figured at approximately
$60,000 to $62,000 a year. V/M Massaro asked how much the meters
would cost. Mr. Woelke said the cost for a new meter was $27 and
that a lot of them could be repaired with replacement of the meter
heads. He said this program was ongoing and would not be accom-
plished within one year. Mayor Kravitz said the cost for replace-
ment was a lot more than the revenue even at 2 1/2%. Mr. Woelke
explained that they do get worse and once it passes ten years it
always gets slower and never speeds up.
C/M Gottesman stated if the meters were read every three months in-
stead of monthly what would happen to the 240 hours to be saved
under this proposal. Mr. Woelke said the meter readers would be
reduced because the entire memo given to Council tied in the three
projects; the replacement program, the mandated backflow prevention
program, which is a must, and the meter readers. C/M Gottesman
said there has to be an excess of manpower someplace. Mr. Woelke
said they are proposing a crew of nine meter readers instead of
eleven.
V/M Massaro asked the time constraints for the backflow prevention
program. Mr. Woelke answered that the time was contingent upon the
first time a person gets sick or dies because of bad water. He
said the Federal Government and DER are for it completely and they
are updating the South Florida Building Code to include that now.
The Acting City Manager suggested that he be allowed the opportun-
ity to investigate the increases in Regular Salaries and report to
Council. V/M Massaro requested additional information about the
backflow prevention program. Mayor Kravitz suggested that this
item be discussed at the Northwest Council of Mayors.
Mr. Woelke informed that for single-family homes the cost for in-
stallation of a meter has been increased to include the back -flow
preventer.
V/M Massaro asked Bob Jahn, Chief Building Official, if they had
backflow devices installed on all new construction. Mr. Jahn said
they are trying to get the Code changed but there is an air gap
preventer on all hose connections. Mr. Woelke said the backflow
devices attach directly to the meter. Mayor Kravitz asked who per-
formed the inspections. Mr. Jahn answered from the meter site to
the house on private property his department inspects but from the
meter backwards to the street, it is the responsibility of the City
Engineering Department. Mr. Woelke said Utilities installed the
devices with the meter up to a one -inch meter; he said his depart-
ment furnishes the device but the developer pays for it in the
installation fee. Mr. Woelke clarified that his department in-
stalls the backflow prevention devices with dual check valves on
single-family homes and any meter up to one -inch in size. He
said in regards to commercial use if another check valve is in-
volved, they are required to do it and it is decided in the
developer's agreement. Mayor Kravitz asked if the developers
installed the device, who would check the inspection. Mr. Woelke
said his department would inspect them on an annual basis. He
said upon the installation by the Utility Department the utility
inspector and the person who performs final inspection for the
CO would also check it out. V/M Massaro asked if the City was
paying for all this and Mr. Woelke informed that the City was only
paying for the single-family dual check valves and meters one -inch
and under. He said for meters one -inch and over the developer has
to put them in and his department inspects and checks them after
they are installed.
4
9/18/85
/vdw
Mr. Jahn explained that the backflow prevention device, which
utility companies are required to obtain, is not required by City
Code. He said they are now installing them on the back side of the
meter on the public utility side because by State law, Mr. Woelke's
department is required to do the installation. Mr. Jahn said he
and Mr. Woelke have been to the Board of Rules and Appeals and
asked them to insert this requirement in the South Florida Building
Code and they have agreed which would allow installation on the
proper side of the meter enabling the Building Department to do the
inspection.
C/M Gottesman asked if the City would have to pay for the meters
and their installations. The Chief Building Official informed that
all new water and sewer agreements include this additional cost.
Mr. Woelke asked that Account #301, 941s and D'esel, be increased
from $20,000 because of the acquisition of additional vehicles.
He said needed to be increased due to the ad-
dition of another leased copying machine to $1000.00 from $600.00.
V/M Massaro asked Acting City Manager Larry Perretti to determine
the necessity of such a sophisticated copying machine.
Mr. John Taribo referenced page 125, Meetings -and Sinars -
Accounts #401 and #402 and asked that those accounts be increased
to $1000 due to their ongoing program of cross -training the em-
ployees. He said Account #430 - Electricity reported their
estimated actual for this year was over $160,000 and asked that it
be increased to $162,000 because of the deep well injection pumps
will increase the use of electricity as well as the installation of
the biofilter system, Mr. Taribo said they are spending on the
Wastewater Plant alone approximately $28,000. Mr. Etheredge said
that he will try to help the Utility Department plan for the future
that whenever a new building is built or equipment is bought that
their budget must also include costs for maintenance and electri-
city. Mayor Kravitz stated if the average monthly electricity cost
for the Wastewater Department was $28,000 then the budget would be
short of $160,000. Mr. Taribo reported that they received vari-
ables during the summer with the heat and the rain. V/M Massaro
asked why last year's budget did not reflect this cost. Mr. Taribo
answered that they have added new equipment. Mayor Kravitz asked
him to check the figures with the Acting City Manager.
Mr. Taribo stated that Mechanic 1 u' nt�- 4464 should be
increased to $20,000. He said the equipment is getting older and
the rule of thumb is that every five years they will lose an exist-
ing piece of equipment. V/M Massaro asked if this item was covered
under Repair and Replacement Funds. Mr. Taribo said some repairs
go through R&R; however, many repairs are done in the plant.
Mayor Kravitz asked Mr. Perretti to check into this account.
Mr. Taribo requested increases for Accounts #401 and 402 -
Meetings and Seminars on page 138. He also asked for increases
in Account #440 - Rentals and_Leases, #464 on page 139 and #527
C eMic4ls. He concluded that their premise is to provide the
best quality water and wastewater treatment at the lowest costs
possible.
Mayor Kravitz adjourned the meeting at 12:30 P.M.
tJZ
CI CLERK
This public document was promulgated at a cost of $��.a5 or $�_
per copy to inform the general public and public officers and employees
about recent opinions and considerations by the City Council of the City
of Tamarac.
5
9/18/85
/vdw