HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-01-10 - City Commission Regular Meeting Minutesrq,y
� n
'clOR%pP
P,O. BOX 25010
TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33320
_FIMT CLAaS,S.....MAIL
CITY OF TAMARAC
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
FRIDAY ARY 10
Instead of W@dneaday, Janugry1986
CALL T DER: 9:00 A.M.
ANNQUNCEMENTS„ OF TIME ALLOCATIONS - MOTIONS T,Q. TABLE - The
Chair at this time will announce those items which have been
given a specific time to be heard, and will entertain motions
from Council members to table those items which require
research. Council may agendize by majority consent matters of
an urgent nature which have come to Council's attention after
publication.
P E E TIO
1. Florida Derb F st' 1- Presentation of
Mayor Kravitz designating February, 1986,
Derby Festival Month".
BOARDS AND COMMITTEES
a proclamation by 1/10/86
as "Florida pg. 4
proc, made
2. Yeterans_Affairs C m'ttee - Temp. Reso. 13956 - 1/10/86
Discussion and possible action to appoint one (1) member. pg. 4
PPTD 1 member
3. Board of Social Sprvices -- Discussion and possible action 1710186
regarding mileage reimbursement to members (tabled from pg. 3 TABLED
1/2/86). till 1/22 meet.
CONSENT AGENDA
4. Items listed under Item #4, Consent Agenda, are viewed to
be routine and the recommendation will be enacted by one
motion in the form listed below. If discussion is
desired, then the item(s) will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and will be considered separately.
a) Minutes of 12/19/85 - Special Meeting — Approval
recommended by City Clerk.
b) Minutes of 12/23/85 - Special Meeting -- Approval
recommended by City Clerk.
c) Robert B. Dunckel' - Special Counsel to Charter Board -
11/21/85 - $1,146.00 -- Approval recommended by Charter
Board.
d) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Consulting Engi-
neer - Invoice 1724-01, Statement 3 - 11/22/85 -
$29,610.18 - Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation (Project
84-4) - Approval recommended by City Engineer/Utili-
ties Director.
L/10/86 pg. 6
APPROVED Items
3) through 0)
ITEM A) REMOVED
ind TABLED to
-he 1/22 meeting,
PAGE 1
1/10/86
e) CH2M Hill - Consulting Engineer - Invoice 11-468 -
11/15/85 - $326.04 - Broward County Environmental
Quality Control Board Variance Extension on Deep Well
(Project 84-2) - Approval recommended by City Engi-
neer/Utilities Director.
f) CH2M Hill - Consulting Engineer - Invoice 11--466 -
11/15/85 - $725.03 - TUW Bond Feasibility Study
(Project 84-1c) -- Approval recommended by City Engi-
neer/Utilities Director.
g) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. -
Invoice 57809 - 11/7/85 - $2,610.00 - Expansion and
rehabilitation of Water Treatment Plant (Project
84-20) - Approval recommended by City Engineer/
Utilities Director.
h) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. -
Invoice 58000 - 11/14/85 - $716.13 - Aerated Flow
Equalization Tank - Approval recommended by City
Engineer/Utilities Director.
i) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. -
Invoice 53638 (revised) - 12/16/85 - $102.17 - Pro-
posed Water Fluoridation (Project 85-10) - Approval
recommended by City Engineer/Utilities Director.
j) Florida Testing & Engineering Co. - Invoice 43164 --
11/30/85 - $264.00 - Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
(Project 84-4) - Approval recommended by City Engi-
neer/Utilities Director.
k) Justice Reporting Service, Inc. - Invoice 10756 -
12/19/85 - $45.00 - EMS Review Committee Hearing -
Approval recommended by City Attorney.
1) J.H. Pilchick & Associates, Inc. - Invoice D851577 -
11/19/85 -- $136.00 - Hidden Hollow Phases I and II
Approval recommended by City Attorney.
m) Superior Reporting, Inc. - Invoice 28242 -- 12/6/85 -
$189.25 -- Broward County Environmental Quality Control
Board hearing - Approval recommended by City Attorney.
n) Bermuda Club Entertainment - Approval to refund the
amount of $80.00 paid for a special police detail
which was cancelled.
o) Occupational Licenses - Temp. Ord. #1218 - Approval to
extend the tabling action to a future meeting (Public
hearing held 11/13/85) (tabled from 12/6/85)
G4NERAL ADMINISTRATIVEZEINANCIAL
5. Cit Code Draina Requirements - Discussion and possible
action to authorize Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc., to
review and evaluate Article IV of Chapter 24 of the Code
concerning drainage (tabled from 1/2/86)
6. if--lnsu anc Fund - Discussion and possible action to
establish a reserve fund.
1/10/86
pg. 18
APPROVED
1/10/86
pgs. 4 & 5
APPROVED
11
1
PAGE 2
1/10/86
1
1
7. Browa d Lpslque of Citiep Business - Discussion and
possible action.
8. NorthWest Council of--Mavgrs Business - Discussion and
possible action.
TAMARAC JITILITIES
9. utilities - Temp. Reso 3883 - Discussion and possible
action to authorize execution of a contract with Shelton
Enterprise;, Inc., to provide notification to the City
when utility locations are required (tabled from 1/2/86).
1/10/86
pg. 6, report
was Riven
1/10/86 pg.6--
report given
1/10/86 pg.18
APPROVED
10. Utilities East and West P o' cts 84-2 a d 85-4 - Pump 1/10/86
Station Reconstruction - Discussion and possible action to Pgs. 18 & 19
authorize Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc., to prepare APPROVED
bid plans and specifications for 6 pump stations in
Tamarac East, 6 pump stations in the Woodlands, and Pump
Stations 1, 19 and 26 in Tamarac West (tabled from 1/2/86)
11. Utilities West (Project 85-271 - Water T e t ent Plant
F'lt b'1'ta 'on -- Discussion and possible action to
authorize James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc.,
to prepare plans and specifications for refurbishing of
Water Treatment Plant filters 3 and 4, including filter
media replacement.
12. Utilities West (Project 85-7) - Wellfield Protegtign
Facilities - Discussion and possible action to authorize
going to bid for this work.
13. Utilities West P ct 85-19 - Rehabilitation and
Expansion of Wastewater Treatment Plan - Discussion and
possible action on:
a) Clarification of Hazen and Sawyer Agreement
1) Correction of Council action for Task Order 1.1
(Design for the installation of four transfer
pumps) - Authorization not to exceed $5,500.00
instead of $4,500.00.
2) Placement of Task Order 1.1 under Hazen and Sawyer
contract raising contract price to $68,100.00 from
$62,600.00.
3) Cancellation of purchase order for Task 1.1 in the
amount of $4,500.00.
b) Authorization to go to bid for this work.
PUBLIC HEARING - 2:00 P.M.
1/10/86
pgs. 19 & 20
APPROVED
1/10/86 pg. 20
Auth. given
1/10/86
pgs. 20 & 21
APPVD a) & b)
14. Investments of City Funds - Temp. Ord. #1233 - Discussion 1/10/86
and possible action to amend Chapter 9 of the Code pgs• 25 - 28
concerning allowable investments. Second Reading. TABLED
LEGAL AFFAIRS
15. VehicleRepairs - Temp. Ord. #1236 - Discussion and 1/1/0/86
possible action to create Section 15-8 of the Code to pgs. 7,8, &34
prohibit all motor vehicle repairs in residentially zoned TABLED
areas. Second Reading. (Public hearing held 1/2/86).
PAGE 3
1/10/86
16. Florida_Lottery - Temp. Reso. #3957 - Discussion and
possible action endorsing the proposal to allow the resi-
dents of Florida to vote upon the issue of whether the
Florida Constitution should be amended to allow for State -
operated lotteries.
17. Orenstein vs. City -of -Tamarac - Report by City Attorney -
Discussion and possible action regarding settlment of this
lawsuit.
18. ESM Litigation -- Discussion and possible action on payment
of the following Invoices as part of the pubi:ic body group:
a) Payment to Peterson & Company in the amount of
$7,579.33.
b) Payment to Peterson & Company in the amount of
$6,008.04.
c) Payment to Peterson & Company in the amount of
$10,799.61.
d) Payment to English, McCaughan & O'Bryan in the amount
of $489.82.
e) Payment to English, McCaughan & O'Bryan in the amount
of $369.90.
99MMU,NITY DEVELOPMENT
19. Tamarac Nursing_genter - Discussion and possible action
on:
a) Assessment of Land Use Amendment costs
b) Landscape Plan (tabled from 1/2/86)
20. _W_o_Qdj4nd Villas - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan -- Temp,, Reso_. #3948
b) Landscape Plan
c) water and Sewer Developers Agreement
d) Water Retention Agreement
e) Blanket Utility Easement - Temp. Reso. #3949,
f) Public Safety Ingress/Egress Easement - Temp. Reso.
#3950
g) Agreement for funding future traffic and signalization
needs
(To be located on the west side of Lagos de Campo Boule-
vard, south of McNab Road, and north of Sandpebbles
Townhouses)
(tabled from 1/2/86)
21. 51ge Dolphin Resta,grant Corp. - Special xc t'on -
Retition #33-Z-85 - Temp. Reso. #3947 - Discussion and
possible action to grant a special exception to permit on -
premises consumption of alcoholic beverages at this
restaurant in the Sunflower Shopping Plaza, 8104 N.
University Drive, which is zoned B-1 (Neighborhood Busi-
ness) (Public hearing held 1/2/86).
22. Golf Villas at,,abalPalm - Discussion and possible action
on:
a) Revised site plan reflecting relocation of dumpsters -
Temp. Reso. #3962
b) Substitution of a Letter of Credit for a cash bond
posted as a homeowners warranty
23. Midway Plaza - Discussion and possible action and review
of traffic pattern shown on the site plan.
1/10/86
pg. 8
APPROVED
1/10/86
pgs. 8 & 9
APPROVED
1/10/86
pgs. 9 & 10
TABLED
1/10/86
pgs. 21 & 22
a) APPROVED
w/cond. B)
TABLED till/22
1/ 1V/ UV
pgs. 22-24
A) & B)
appvd w/con
C) APPROVED
D) , E) , F)
APPROVED G)
REMOVED from
Agenda.
1/10/86 pgs.
3 & 4 TABLED
1/10/86
pgs. 30 & 31
A) APPROVE.
B) DENIED
1/10/86
pgs. 28-30
TABLED
PAGE 4
1/10/86
24.
Tract 24 -- Temp. Reso. #3963 - Discussion and possible
1/10/86
action on request for refund of the following fees and a
pgs. 14-16
determination of the status of the site plan:
TABLED till
a) Water and Sewer Developers Agreement - $172,890.00
1/22/86
b) Drainage Retention Fee - 23,814.00
c) Drainage Improvement Fee - 2,093.00
d) Cash Bond in connection with
Platting Waiver - 15,000.00
25.
,jasmine - Discussion and possible action on:
1/10/86 pg-32
a) Model sales permit and waiver of the 300--foot distance
APPROVED a)
requirement for issuance of certificates of occupancy.
& b)
b) Grant of Temporary Easement w TgmR, Reso,3 1
26.
Eagsidg at Isles of Tamarac - Discussion and possible
1/10/86
action on:
pgs. 32 & 33
a) Amendment to the Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
TABLED
b) Model sales permit and waiver of the 150--foot distance
requirement for issuance of certificates of occupancy
c) Easement and Option Agreement in connection with the
model sales facility - TgMp� _ Reso., 3$34
(tabled from 1/2/86)
27.
Arbors s s T marac - Discussion and possible
action on:
1/10/86
pgs. 33 & 34
a) Renewal of a model sales permit and waiver of the 150-
APPROVED for
foot distance requirement for issuance of certificates
6 months from
of occupancy (tabled from 12/11/85)
12.13/85 B)
b) Substitution of a home warranty bond for a cash bond
APPROVED
posted as a homeowner warranty
28.
Woodmont Tract 48 Waterford at Wood n - Sian
1/10/86
Waivers - Discussion and possible action on renewal of two
pgs. 10 & 11
sign waivers for signs on property other than the
APPROVED w/
applicant's -- Temp. Reso. #3926 (tabled from 12/11/85)
conditions
29.
Exgcutive Center - Performance Bond - Temp,_Regg,
1/10/86
#3959 -- Discussion and possible action to call a perform-
pg. 34
ance bond posted for public improvements.
APPROVED
30.
Southgate Apartments (Ga.Kdingj Industries) - Perform-�
1/10/86
ance Bond - Temp. Reso. 13960 - Discussion and possible
pg. 11
action to call a performance bond posted for public
APPROVED
improvements.
31.
Nprthwood II - Mod l les F c' 't - Discussion and
possible action to renew a model sales permit and waiver
of the 300-foot distance requirement for issuance of
1/10/86
pg. 11
APPROVED
certificates of occupancy.
32.
Nogftgnt Tract 74/75 - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Renewal of a model sales permit for Site Plans 1 and 3
b) Renewal of a model sales permit and waiver of the 300-
foot distance requirement for issuance of certificates
1/10/86
pg. 11
APPROVED A)
& B)
of occupancy for Site Plan 2
REPORTS
33.
City Council
1/10/86 pg.34
no report
34.
City Manager
pg.4
no report.
IT1786 pg.
no report.
35.
City Attorney
PAGE 5
1/10/86
City Council may consider and act upon such other business as
may come before it.
Pursuant to Chapter 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person
decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with
respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is based.
Carol E. Barbuto
Assistant City Clerk
Following are the residential and commercial zoning districts in the City:
A-1
- Limited Agricultural
A-5
- Agricultural/Excavation
B-1
- Neighborhood Business
B-2
- Planned Community Business
B-3
- General Business
B-5
- Limited Business District
B-6
- Business District
I-1
- Institutional
M-1 -
Light Industrial
M-2 -
Medium Industrial
R-1 -
Single Family Residence
R-1 B &
R-IC -
One Family Dwelling
R-2 -
Two Family Dwelling
R-3 -
Low Density Multiple Dwelling
R-3U -
Row House
R-4A -
Planned Apartment
R-5 -
Motel/Hotel
RD-7 -
Two Family Dwelling
RM-5 -
Residential Multi -Family
Dwelling
RM-10 -
Planned Apartment
S-1 -
Open Space/Recreational
T-1 -
Trailer Park District
he
is
1
1
1
PAGE 6
1/10/86
36. Tamarac Park satellite Building Emergency Purchase
of windows - Discussion and Possible Action.
37. Public Works Department 12ower Budget Transfer -
Discussion an Possible Action. _
38. Tamarac Park - Sanitary Sewer Relocation -
Discussion and.possib e action.
39. TUW - 201 Relook and Update Account Numbers - Discussion
an�c. possible action.
40. Fire Hydrant Marking - Discussion and possible action
on:
a) Approval to have the City Engineering Department
do the necessary work
b) Approval for the Engineering Department to purchase
markers
41. Invoice for Kruse, O'Connor & Ling, Actuaries -
Discussion and possible action regarding payment.
42. TUE - Tamarac Lakes Gravity Sewer - Project 84-5 -
Approval to go to Bid - Discussion and possible action
43. City Hall Emergency Roof Re airs - Discussion and
possible action.
1/10/86 pg.1
Agen. by Con.
see 2g.
12
1/10/86
pg.l
Agen.
by con.
see RS.
12
1/10/86
pg•
see pg.
13
1/10/86 Pg.2
Agen. By Con.
see pgs. 13&
14
1/ IV/ ?50 pg. Z-
Agen. by
consent, see
pg. 16
1/10/86 pg.2
Agen, by Con.
see p2sl6&17
J-/iU/un pg.Z
Agen. by Con.
see Z6. 17
Pg
Agen. by Con,
see pg. 17
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
January 10, 1986
Tape 1 CALL TO OBDER: Mayor Philip B. Kravitz called the meeting to order
on Friday, January 10, 1986, (instead of Wednesday,
January 8, 1986), at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT:
Mayor Philip B. Kravitz
Vice Mayor Helen Massaro
Councilman Arthur H. Gottesman
Councilman Raymond J. Munitz
Councilman Sydney M. Stein
ALSO PRESENT•
Larry Perretti, Acting City Manager
Jon M. Henning, City Attorney
Carol E. Barbuto, Assistant City Clerk
Patricia Marcurio, Secretary
MEDITATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEQIANCE: Mayor Kravitz called for a
Moment of Silent Meditation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATI E FINANCIA
36. Tamarac Park Satellite Bu' d'n - Emergency Purchasp.
Windows - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Page 12).
V/M Massaro said Chief Building Official, Bob Jahn, has requested
the authority to purchase the windows for the Tamarac Park Sat-
ellite Building as a sole source item and she MOVED to Agendize
this item by Consent. SECONDED by C/M Stein.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
37. Public Works DepartMgnt Mower - Budget Transfer - Discussion
and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Page 12) .
V/M Massaro said Frank Etheredge, Finance Director, has requested
that a budget adjustment be made concerning the approval that was
given for Public Works to purchase a mower. She MOVED to Agendize
this item by Consent, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED__ AYE
38. Jamarac Park - Sanitary Sewer Relocation - Discussion and
possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Page 13) .
V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent discussion and possible
action concerning the Tamarac Park Sanitary Sewer Relocation.
SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
1 1/10/86
/pm
UTILITIES
39. TUW - 201 Relook and Update Account Numbers - Discussion and
Possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ,ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Pages 13 & 14).
V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent discussion and possible
action concerning a relook and update report for the feasibility
of 201. She said previously Council approved having Williams,
Hatfield & Stoner do this work at a cost of $5,500.00. She said
there was an error made in the accounts from which the money was
to be taken. She said it was Account #434-506-598-324 and it has
since been determined that the monies must come from 3 different
sources. SECONDED by C/M Stein.
VOTE:
ALL YQTED AYE
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANC;IAL
40. Fire d n M k'n - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Approval to have the City Engineering Department do the
necessary work
b) Approval for the Engineering Department to purchase markers
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Page 16).
a) V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent authorization for the
Engineering Department to mark all existing and future hydrants
and associated valves with reflector markers. SECONDED by
C/M Stein.
TE: ALL VOTED AYE
b) V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent approval for the
Engineering Department to purchase 2,000 blue markers and 1,000
green markers with the necessary epoxy tube sets at an upset price
not to exceed $6,000.00. SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
41. In c r K se 'Connor & -Linq, Actu ries - Discussion and
possible action regarding payment.
SYNOPSIS OF_ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Pages 16 & 17).
V/M Massaro said a request was submitted to pay Kruse, O'Connor &
Ling, Actuaries, and she MOVED to Agendize this item by Consent.
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AY
UTILITIES
42. TUE - Tamarac Lak s Gravity Sewer - Project 84-5 -
go to Bid - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS -OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Page 17).
Approval to
2
i
1/10/86
/pm
V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent a request by the
Engineering Department to proceed with procurement for the con-
struction bidding of the Tamarac Lakes Gravity Sewer, Project
84-5. SECONDED by C/M Stein.
VOTE: ALL YOTEDAYE
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
43. City Hall Emergency Roof Repairs - Discussion and possible
action.
.SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Page 17).
V/M Massaro said there is a portion of the City Hall roof that has
never been repaired and there is water leaking into the Finance
Department which is dangerously close to the wires that run
throughout that room.
V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent the authorization for the
City Manager to waive the advertised bidding procedures and use
emergency procedures as the Charter provides to repair the roof
with Council having an emergency meeting after the Acting City
Manager receives the two quotes necessary. SECONDED by
C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
BQARDS AND COMMITTEES
3. p_.dxd of Social Services -- Discussion and possible action
regarding mileage reimbursement to members (tabled from
1/2/86).
SYNOPSIS QF ACTION: TABLED
to the 1/22/86 Council meeting
at the request of the Acting
City Manager.
Acting City Manager Perretti requested that this item be TABLED to
the 1/22/86 Council, meeting.
V/M Massaro so MOVED, SECONDED by C/M Stein.
VOTE:
C/M Stein Aye
C/M Munitz Nay
C/M Gottesman Aye
V/M Massaro Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
21. Blue Dolphin Restaurant Corp. - .peciAl Exception -
Petition 33-Z--85 - Temp. Resv,_ #3947 - Discussion and
possible action to grant a special exception to permit on -
premises consumption of alcoholic beverages at this restaurant
in the Sunflower Shopping Plaza, 8104 N. University Drive,
which is zoned B-1 (Neighborhood Business) (Public hearing
held 1/2/86)
SYNOPS I,a.__QF ACTION: TABLED
at the request of the applicant
for submittal of required
information.
1/10/86
/pm
V/M Massaro said the applicant has requested a TABLING of this
item for submittal of the required information and she so MOVED,
SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
TE:
PRESENTATIONS
ALL VOTED ,AYE
1. F1Qrida Derby__FQstival - Presentation of a proclamation by
Mayor Kravitz designating February, 1986, as "Florida Derby
Festival Month".
Y OP I OF ACTION: Proclamation
was presented.
Mayor Kravitz presented a proclamation designating February, 1986,
as "Florida Derby Month" to Irving Vitrofsky, Recreation Board
member.
B ARD AND COMMITTEES
2. Veterans A f r Committee -- Temp. Reso #3 56 - Discussion
and possible action to appoint one (1) member.
SNOPSIS,,OF ACTION: APPROVED
appointing Morris Landman as a
member to this Committee.
RESOLUTION NO. R-86-8 PASSED.
Mr. Henning read Tempi Reso„�3956 by title.
Mayor Kravitz said as liaison to this Committee, he spoke to the
Vice Chairman and they proposed an application from Morris Landman
and he recommended this appointment be made.
C/M Stein so MOVED, SECONDED by V/M Massaro.
MQ E :
ALL V TED AYE
GENERAL ADMI I TRATI E FIN NCIAL
6. Belf-I surance Fund - Discussion and possible action to
establish a reserve fund.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
a recommendation of the Insurance
Advisory Committee to establish a
reserve fund within the next fiscal
year budget at a rate of $200,000 for the
first year and $100,000 for the next
3 years to realize a total of $500,000.
V/M Massaro read the memo from Frank Etheredge, Finance Director,
which stated, "I agree with your recommendations to create a
reserve fund for Self -Insurance purposes. I do recommend we
include this matter in our budget preparation for next year. I do
not believe we could handle the $200,000 payment at this time but
the idea is sound and in the best interests of the City."
Judy Deutsch, Acting Personnel Director, said at their October
meeting, the Insurance Advisory Committee had recommended that the
City begin establishing a Self -Insurance Fund.
1
1
1
4
1/10/86
/pm V,
Mrs.
Deutsch said that was the
time when the City's insurance had
been
cancelled and there was some
doubt as to when and where this
would
be placed. She said the
Committee was acting to provide for
the
V/M
future so there would not
Massaro asked if there was
be an emergency situation again.
an immediate problem at this time
and
Mrs. Deutsch said the City
is covered through 9/30/86.
Mr. Henning asked if the deductible amount has gone up to $10,000
and Mrs. Deutsch said the Police Professional Insurance has gone
up to that amount. She said the General Liability is still
$2,500. Mr. Henning asked if this Self -Insurance Fund is for all
policies or just for the General Liability and Mrs. Deutsch said
that would give her the flexibility to look into higher deduct-
ibles to begin self -insuring for some of the City's lower risk
coverages. She said she would like to see the City build a
reserve fund to hold the premium costs down and she agrees
completely with the Insurance Advisory Committee.
V/M Massaro MOVED that Council consider the recommendation sound
and in the appropriate time before or during the preparation of
the next budget, this program be implemented of the $500,000
Reserve Fund with $200,000 the first year and $100,000 for the
next 3 years. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
CONSENT AGENDA
4. Cgnsgnt Agenda
a) Minutes of 12/19/85 - Special Meeting - Approval recommended
by City Clerk.
b) Minutes of 12/23/85 - Special Meeting - Approval recommended
by City Clerk.
c) Robert B. Dunckel.- Special Counsel to Charter Board
11/21/85 - $1,146.00 - Approval recommended by Charter Board.
d) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Consulting Engineer -
Invoice 1724-01, Statement 3 - 11/22/85 - $29,610.18 - San-
itary Sewer Rehabilitation (Project 84-4) - Approval
recommended by City Engineer/Utilities Director
e) CH2M Hill - Consulting Engineer - Invoice 11-468 - 11/15/85 -
$326.04 Broward County Environmental Quality Control Board
Variance Extension on Deep Well (Project 84-2).- Approval
recommended by City Engineer/Utilities Director.
f) CH2M Hill - Consulting Engineer - Invoice 11-466 - 11/15/85 -
$725.03 - TUW Bond Feasibility Study (Project 84-1c) -
Approval recommended by City Engineer/Utilities Director.
g) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. - Invoice
57809 - 11/7/85 - $2,610.00 Expansion and Rehabilitation of
Water Treatment Plant (Project 84-20) - Approval recommended
by City Engineer/Utilities Director.
h) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. - Invoice
58000 - 11/14/85 - $716.13 - Aerated Flow Equalization Tank -
Approval recommended by City Engineer/Utilities Director.
i) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. - Invoice
53638 (revised) - 12/16/85 - $102.17 - Proposed Water
Fluoridation (Project 85-10) - Approval recommended by City
Engineer/Utilities. Director.
j) Florida Testing & Engineering Co. - Invoice 43164 - 11/30/85 -
$264.00 - Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation (Project 84-4) -
Approval recommended by City Engineer/Utilities Director.
i
5 /
1/10/86
/pm
k) Justice Reporting Service, Inc. - Invoice 10756 - 12/19/85 -
$45.00 - EMS Review Committee Hearing - Approval recommended
by City Attorney.
1) J.H. Pilchick & Associates, Inc. - Invoice D851577 - 11/19/85-
$136.00 - Hidden Hollow Phases I and II - Approval recommended
by City Attorney.
m) Superior Reporting, Inc. - Invoice 28242 - 12/6/85 - $189.25 -
Broward County Environmental Quality Control Board hearing -
Approval recommended by City Attorney.
n) Bermuda Club Entertainment - Approval to refund the amount of
$80.00 paid for a special police detail which was cancelled.
o) Occupational Licenses - Temp. Ord. #1218 - Approval to extend
the tabling action to a future meeting (Public hearing held
11/13/85) (tabled from 12/6/85)
SYNOPSIS OF _ACTION:
APPROVED Items b) through o).
Item a) was REMOVED and TABLED
to the 1/22/86 Council meeting.
Mr. Henning asked that Item a) be REMOVED from the agenda for
discussion.
V/M Massaro MOVED that Item a) be REMOVED from the agenda and
that Items b) through o) be APPROVED, SECONDED by
C/M Gottesman.
TE: ALL VOTED AYE
a) Mr. Henning said the Minutes of 12/19/85 contain a verbatim trans-
cript of the Watkins hearing and there were some typographical
errors that have to be corrected. He requested these be TABLED to
the next regular Council meeting.
V/M Massaro MOVED that this item be TABLED to the 1/22/86 Council
meeting, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
7. Broward League „gfCities-Business - Discussion and possible
action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Mayor Kravitz
gave a report.
Mayor Kravitz said the Council has received copies of the last
meeting of the Broward League. He said the next meeting will be
on 1/16/86 with Jack Tobin and Senator Weinstein as speakers.
8. Nortbwest Council of Mayors Business - Discussion and possible
action.
SYNOPSIS QF_ACT,ION: Mayor Kravitz
gave a report.
Mayor Kravitz said the next meeting will be Monday, 1/13/86;
however, he will not be attending that meeting.
i'
6 /
1/10/86
/pm
LEGAL AFFAIRS
15. Vehicle Repairs.- Temp. Ord. #1236 - Discussion and possible
action to create Section 15--8 of the Code to prohibit all
motor vehicle repairs in residentially zoned areas. Second
Reading. (Public hearing held 1/2/86).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
HELD for later in the day.
(See Page 34).
Mr. Henning read Temp. Ord,, #1236 by title.
Mr. Henning said this was placed on the agenda to make revisions
regarding the penalties with changes made to Page.2, Paragraph D.
He said it now reads, "Any person who knowingly performs vehicle
repairs, who permits a vehicle owned by him or in his possession
to be repaired or permits vehicle repairs to be made on property
owned or rented by him contrary to this Section, shall be subject
to a fine of $100.00. Each vehicle and each day shall be a separ-
ate violation." He said there were other minor changes made on
this 1/9/86 revision: in one of the Whereas clauses he changed
"unaesthetic" to "unsightly" and in the prohibition there is a
strike through of "other than minor" and this should be deleted
completely.
Mr. Henning said there is a strike through shown on Page 2 which
should be deleted completely. He said the way this was originally
drafted, towing of vehicles was restricted except by licensed
towing companies and he was unsure whether Council wanted to be
that restrictive. He said originally the fines were $25.00 for
the first violation and then open to the court for subsequent
violations.
C/M Gottesman said he recollects that at the last hearing on this
item, it was suggested that the fine should be "up to $500" with-
out a.minimum which is now placed in there. Mr. Henning said both
were discussed and this would permit people to pay the fine over
the counter instead of going to court.
Vickie Beech, resident, asked Mr. Henning who will enforce this
Ordinance and Mr. Henning said the Code Enforcement Officers and
the Police Department.
Frank Altobello, President of Section 23, asked if this Ordinance
will apply to a person who dismantles vehicles and does not repair
them. Mr. Henning suggested on Page 1, Section A, Line 31, "No
motor vehicles may be dismantled or repaired...".
V/M Massaro questioned what would happen if dismantling is taking
place but no one sees the person doing that and C/M Stein said
all the City can do is legislate and the proof of what the person
is doing is up to the courts. He said there is no way the City
Council can legislate evidence.
Mr. Henning said in the existing language on Page 2, Line 7, it
states, "Any person who knowingly performs vehicle repairs or
dismantling, who _permits a .vehicle ..owned by him or in his
possession to be repaired or permits vehicle repairs or
dismantling to be made on property owned or rented by him...".
He said the owner of property who permits the dismantling on his
property would be guilty of violating the Ordinance.
7 �
1/10/86 I/
/pm
Harold Newman, resident, asked if the terminology "disabled" could
be added as well. C/M Stein noted that this would not be fair
since someone could break down and does not deserve a violation
charge. V/M Massaro said if there is not a valid registration or
license tag then that should not be there. C/M Stein agreed that
that could be added. Mr. Henning said it is already illegal to
have an expired tag.
Morris Haber, resident, suggested the word "storage" also be
included to pick up the illegal storage of a dismantled car.
C/M Stein said that is illegal since a homeowner is allowed to
store a relative's car for a short period of time and he suggested
it should refer to one that has no license plate.
Mr. Henning said he could include this language by this afternoon
and Mayor Kravitz agreed to hold this item for that purpose.
V/M Massaro suggested that when this Ordinance is approved by
Council, Mr. Altobello should have a copy sent to the man who is
in violation.
16. Florida Lottery - Temp. Reso. #3957 - Discussion and possible
action endorsing the proposal to allow the residents of
Florida to vote upon the issue of whether the Florida
Constitution should be amended to allow for State -operated
lotteries.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED. RESOLUTION NO. R-86-10 PASSED.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3957 by title.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #3957, SECONDED by
C/M Gottesman.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
17. Orenstein_vs- City of -Tamarac - Report by City Attorney -
Discussion and possible action regarding settlement of this
lawsuit.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: ADOPTED the
recommendation of the City Attorney
and Alan Ruf's office to APPROVE the
settlement and authorize the City
officials to execute all necessary
documents in connection with funds
to come from the Interim Service Account.
Tape 2
Mr. Henning said this is a dispute that was handled in the small
claims court concerning a property owner who was charged an in-
terim service fee in the amount of $687.50 at the time of receiv-
ing his certificate of occupancy. He said apparently the property
in full value had already been placed on the tax rolls. He said
the interim service fee is additional compensation to the City for
properties which are not on the tax rolls.
Mr. Henning said he and Alan Ruf's office feel this matter can be
settled for a refund of the fee plus attorney fees and court costs
of $44.00 for a total of $731.50. He said, if possible, this
should be reimbursed from the Interim Service Fee Fund since that
is where the payment was made. He recommended approval of the
settlement and authorization for the appropriate City officials to
execute whatever releases and settlement documents are necessary.
8
1/10/86
/pm
C/M Gottesman MOVED APPROVAL of the recommendation of the City
Attorney and the office of Alan Ruf in the settlement of this
case, SECONDED by VIM Massaro.
VIM Massaro said the.Ynterim Service Fee Fund.was adopted to pick
up where a building was not completed until after the determina-
tion had been made as -to who is on the tax roll and who is not.
She said if they did not have a CO at that particular time it did
not go on the tax roll, therefore, this would pick that up.
VOTE•
ALL VOTED AYE
18. ESM Litigation — Discussion and possible action on payment of
the following invoices as part of the public body group:
a) Payment to Peterson & Company in the amount of $7,579.33
b) Payment to Peterson & Company in the amount of $6,008.04
c) Payment to Peterson & Company in the amount of $10,799.61
d) Payment to English, McCaughan & O'Bryan in the amount of
$489.82
e) Payment to English, McCaughan & O'Bryan-in the amount of
$369.90
SYNOPSIS OF_ACTION: TABLED
until the City Attorney receives
a bill from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
with a status report.
Mr. Henning said the City has received cover letters from Morgan,
Lewis & Bockius, legal counsel to the City, on a recommendation
for approval of these invoices. He said primarily with the
Alexander Grant case, there is a "public body group" which is a
number of government bodies that are involved in the lawsuit that
have pooled together with a weighted average of their costs and
are sharing the expenses. He said the total bills are $282,688.00
for which Tamarac's share, based on 8+ percent, totals approxi-
mately $25,000.00.
Mr. Henning said another City was added to the group which brought
the percentage down: invoices a) through d) are 8.94% and e) is
8.36%. He said the first three items concern Peterson & Company
who are auditors that are assisting in the preparation of the
lawsuit and English, McCaughan & O'Bryan is a local law firm that
is also working on the lawsuit with the group.
Mr. Henning said he would recommend approval but there should be a
report after this from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius as to how much more
is expected to be spent. He_said when they.met.with Council
previously, they said it would cost approximatley a quarter of a
million dollars and they have already reached that point. He said
he sent the backup sheets to Council confidentially, since they
are still attorney/client privileged documents. He said there is
some travel involved as well.
VIM Massaro said she is not in favor of approving this since this
is:contrary to the letter that Council received.from them. She
said it was her understanding that there would be a cost of
approximately $250,000.00 in the entire lawsuit but the amount on
today's agenda was 8.94% of the pro-rata share of the latest bill
of $84,780.00. She.said.she has not seen a bill.for anything more
than that until this was received.
9
1/10/86 J
/pm
V/M Massaro said she also wants to see the bill from Morgan, Lewis
& Bockius to determine their charges to the City, if any. She
said their fees should be minimal, if anything. She said they
were supposed to bill the City monthly and no bills have been
received.
V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE any action on this until a reasonable
explanation is received from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius as to where
the City is presently, along with an up--to--date bill from Morgan,
Lewis & Bockius.
C/M Stein said he agrees with V/M Massaro, however, the City has
agreed to go along with the group. He said even if the City
severed that agreement today, the City's proportionate share to
date would have to be paid. He said he assumes the City Attorney
has submitted this bill after checking the total bill submitted to
the public group. Mr. Henning said that was done.
C/M Gottesman said V/M Massaro has not said the City is not
agreeable to paying these invoices, but she wants to know if there
is a doubling of fees here to what is being paid to Morgan, Lewis
& Bockius. V/M Massaro said she wants to know if Tamarac is
duplicating that effort by suing Alexander Grant separately and,
if not, are there any bills from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
Mr. Henning said an explanation can be gotten if this is Tabled.
He said Tamarac is a plaintiff in the Alexander Grant case as are
all the people in the public body group.
C/M Gottesman SECONDED the MOTION to TABLE.
V/M Massaro noted that she wants Mr. Henning to get a bill from
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
28. Woodmont Tract 48 (Waterford at Woodmont) - Sign W-aiyers --
Discussion and possible action on renewal of two sign waivers
for signs on property other than the applicant's - Temp.
Reso. #3926 (tabled from 12/11/85)
SYNOPSI5 QFACTION: APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. R-86-16 PASSED.
with conditions.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3926 by title.
V/M Massaro said when someone has a permit to erect a sign on
property other than their own, there is usually a letter received
by the City with permission to continue that sign being at that
location. She asked Mr. Henning if the original approval for
using that property gave them an unlimited time.
Mr. Henning said there is a memo dated 12/17/85 to the Mayor and
Council from the City Clerk which reads, "I reviewed the subject
project files and have found letters from Woodmont Corporation
dated 7/31/84 granting permission to Waterford Tract 48 to use
Woodmont property for installation of signs at the entry of
Woodmont on Southgate Blvd. This permission has an open -ending
term, therefore, additional permission letters have not been
solicited."
10
E
1/10/86
/pm
1
1
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Resos_#3.926 renewing the sign
waivers with the proviso that Mr. Henning examine that original
approval and determine that they have the right to have the signs
without formal approval from the owner of the property.
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
30. Southgate_ Apartments Cardinal Industries) - Performance
Bond -- Temp. Reso. #3960 - Discussion and possible action to
call a performance bond posted for public improvements.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED RESOLUTION NO.. R-86-1.8 PASSED.
See Pages .34 &.. 35 for
Reconsideration and further
action.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso, #3960 by title.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. ,#3960, SECONDED by
C/M Stein.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
3.1. Nggthwood II - Model s facility - Discussion and possible
action to renew a model sales .permit and waiver of the 300-
foot distance requirement for issuance of certificates of
occupancy.
SYNOPSIS OF. ACTION: APPROVED.
V/M Ma,s-saro MOVED APPROVAL of renewal of the model sales permit
and waiver of the 300-foot distance requirement for issuance of
certificates of occupancy, SECONDED by C/M Stein.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
32. Wo d nt Tr ct 74 75 - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Renewal of a model sales permit for Site Plans 1 and 3
b) Renewal of a model sales permit and waiver of the 300--foot
distance requirement for issuance of certificates of
occupancy for Site Plan 2
SYNOPSIE QF ACTION:
APPROVED a) and b).
a) V/M Mas-saro MOVED APPROVAL of renewal of the model sales permit
for Site Plans.l and 3, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL MTED AYE
b) V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of renewal of the model sales permit
for Site Plan 2 and waiver of the 300-foot distance requirement
for issuance of certificates of occupancy, SECONDED by
C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL TED AYE
11 `�
1/10/86
/pm
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
36. Tama_ 4c Park Satellite Building -- Emergency Purchase of
Windows -- Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent on Page 1
Authorized the Chief Building Official,
through the Acting City Manager, purchasing
Pan American windows as a sole source
item in the amount of $2,079.97.
V/M Massaro said this is a sole source item which specifically
called for the Pan American windows in the plans and specs. She
said they do have a bid in the amount of $2,079.97 which is below
the $2,500.00 budgeted for this item.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of the Chief Building Official, through
the Acting City Manager, purchasing these windows. SECONDED by
C/M Munitz.
V/M Massaro asked the Acting City Manager if he looked at the
sizes of these windows to determine whether they were safe for
this type of building which will be used by teenagers. Acting
City Manager Perretti said the windows in the first design of the
building were larger than the present ones being.ordered. He said
this type of window is safe. He said in 1983, when this was
approved, the Council waived the City Manager having authority for
a maximum of $2,000.00 and increased it to $2,500.00. He said
this was one of the reasons, even though it was under that amount,
he did not want to approve of it without Council approval.
Bob Jahn, Chief Building Official, said safety was taken into
account, however, he will check this further and, if the window is
changed, it would lower the purchase price.
VOTE:
ALL ,STATED AYE
37. Public Works De a t ent Mower - Budget Transfer - Discussion
and possible action.
SYNOPSIO QFACTION: Agendized by Consent on Page 1
APPROVED.
Acting City Manager Perretti said the sum of $9,333.0'0 is going to
be transferred from Account #001-872--581--901 named Contingency to
Account #001--131--541-640 named Public Works Vehicles. He said the
Contingency Account previously had $122,100.00 and after the
transfer the amount remaining is $112,767.00. He said the Public
Works Vehicle Account had a "0" balance and now has $9,333.00.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of the budget adjustment. (See
Attachment 1).
V/M Massaro added to her MOTION that the Acting City Manager is to
sign the transfer request form. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
TE: ALL yQTED AYE
12
1/10/86 1
/pm
38. Tamarac Park -- Sanitary Sewer Relocation - Discussion and
possible action.
1
1
I
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent on Page 1
APPROVED an expenditure up to
$25,000.00 to relocate an existing
sanitary sewer including engineering
fees to redesign and prepare contract
documents for -construction. -Authorization
was given.to advertise for competitive
bids.
V/M Massaro said this sanitary sewer is in bad condition and was
not installed as well as it should have been. She said it crosses
the land completely and was not done in a manner which is
acceptable. She said it is leaking now and must be removed since
the City Engineers said they would not touch it in its present
location. She said this must be relocated and placed in the
easements available with a cost up to $25,000.00.
V/M Massaro MOVED to. APPROVE.an.expenditure up to $25,000.00 to
relocate an existing sanitary -sewer including the engineering fees
to redesign the sanitary sewer and to prepare the contract docu-
ments with the construction of it. She said they are authorized
to advertise for competitive bids for construction. SECONDED by
C/M-Gottesman.
Vickie Beech, resident, asked who was responsible for the original
sewer installation and V/M Massaro said it was TUI. Mrs. Beech
asked if the City Engineers approved this at the time and
V/M Massaro said they probably did.
VOTE:
UTILITIES
ALL _ VOTED .AAYE
39.:.TUW -.291 Re Qok and update Account Numbers - Discussion and
possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent on Page 2
APPROVED with the Revised Account
Numbers as listed herein.
V/M Massaro said Council APROVED.the expenditure of $5,500.00 for
Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc., to perform the reevaluation of
the 201 and it.was charged to Account #434-506-598.324, which was
titled Deep Injection Well. She said the Engineering Department
has stated that this should -be charged in the following manner:
Job-- Description Acct # Amount All c t d
84-2 Deep Injection Well
84-7 Sludge Dewatering
& Composting
85-19 TUW Rehab./
Expan. STP
434-506-598-324 $ 2,805.00 51
434-507-599-324
434--513-598-324
TOTAL -
1,265.00 23
1,430.00 26
$ 5,500.00
V/M Massaro MOVED that these adjustments to the costs be made by
the Finance Department, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
C/M Gottesman asked if there is.a report on the progress of this
and V/K Massaro said a.Preliminary Report is expected early next
week with a final report a week after that.
Vickie Beech, resident, asked why this has to be reevaluated when
just 2 years ago there was a report. V/M Massaro said circum-
stances have changed since at that time there were many unanswered
questions.
13
1/10/86
/pm
Acting City Manager Perretti said when the first study was made,
the only connection outlet was on Sample Rd. and, since that time,
there is now a new connection outlet possibility on Southgate Blvd.
and 441. He said the cost involved in connecting to this new
location was never researched before.
C/M Stein said that is incorrect since they were always there but
there was a question as to the availability of flowage from 441 to
the plant. He said it was doubtful then and is still doubtful
whether that is really a viable alternative. He said the sale of
the excess of 4 million gallons was not done in 1984, it was done
prior to 1984. He said when the City decided to use spray irriga-
tion, the County was contacted for the sale of the City's excess.
He said it was culminated in 1984 but was done long before that.
C/M Stein said from the very beginning, he discussed with
Bill Greenwood, City Engineer/Utilities Director, the possibility
of 201. He said this large user was taken over by the City when
the City bought the plant and they had already signed the contract
with the County. He said when it was stated that the City would
leave the 201 Program because it would cost more, there was never a
figure of what that amount was. He said the then -City Manager
published a statement which said that the City cannot hook into the
201 Program since the cost was prohibitive. He said that is why no
further study was made. He said nowhere was a figure stated of the
alternative if the City did not use spray irrigation.
Melanie Reynolds, Charter Board Aide, asked if this was the
$5,500.00 study by Williams, Hatfield & Stoner being considered and
V/M Massaro answered, yes. Mrs. Reynolds said this is in violation
of the Charter since any study over $5,000.00 must go to competi-
tive bidding.
Mr. Henning said the Statutory requirement for competitive negotia-
tions referred to is the $5,000.00 fee for services or a
$200,000.00 project cost. He said since the City already has
Williams, Hatfield & Stoner as engineering consultants, they could
be given this project. Mrs. Reynolds said it was either the State
Statutes or the Attorney General's opinion that even though there
are consulting people, it must still go to competitive bidding.
Mr. Henning said he disagrees.
V/M Massaro said to correct C/M Stein's statement that the capacity
was sold in 1983, it was not. She said he admitted it was culmin-
ated in 1984 and nothing is effective until it is culminated.
VOTE:
C/M Stein Aye
C/M Munitz Absent
C/M Gottesman Aye
V/M Massaro Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Tape 3
24. Ti-ac-t. 24 - Temp�_Reso* #3963 - Discussion and possible action
on request for refund of the following fees and a determination
of the status of the site plan:
a) Water and Sewer Developers Agreement - $172,890.00
b) Drainage Retention Fee - 23,814.00
c) Drainage Improvement Fee - 2,093.00
d) Cash Bond in connection with
Platting Waiver - 15,000.00
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED
to the 1/22/86 Council meeting.
1
14
1/10/86
/pm
SYNOPSIS,,,,QF—ACTION: Cont'd..
The applicant is to send a letter
as to his intentions.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3963 by title.
Mr. Henning said Tract 24 had an approved site plan on 6/18/85 for
113 units. C/M Gottesman asked Alan Kan, Attorney for Tract 24, if
these were townhouses and Mr. Kan said they are "zero lot line".
Mr. Henning said there was a request from the attorney to refund
the fees because there was a question whether the developer would
proceed.
Mr. Henning said this Resolution would require a voiding of the
site plan, partial refund at the request of the developer and,
other fees that were not refundable, are set out in the Resolution.
Mr. Henning said Mr. Kan has indicated that d), the $15,000.00 cash
bond, is of top priority and he requested deferring the other items
until he can confirm what his developers want .to do. He said the
Resolution indicates that the plat has been recorded but, apparent-
ly, it has not yet been recorded but has been approved by the
County.
Mr. Kan said the County procedure for recording and approval of
plats is two steps; after going through the staff committees, it
would go to the County Commission for approval. He said the plat
was approved and the step to recording requires the.engineer to
make whatever minor changes on the plat that have been requested by
the County and execute either performance construction bonds for
the various roads the County wants or Impact Fee Agreements for
recreational dedication.and roars improvements. He said those
agreements are in the General Counsel's office for their review
and, as a result, the plat itself has not been recorded.
Mr. Kan said d) required they submit a $15,000.00 cash bond to do
some construction prior to platting and, if, in fact, they never
got to platting, the money would be there to demolish the water and
sewer lines put in. He said they have no intention of installing
those water and sewer lines and they would like to withdraw that
part of it.
...V/K.Massaro said refunds are not made until it is,.determined what
the.cost has.been to the.City for processing. She said there is a
great deal of work -by the Engineering Department that goes into
processing the CIAC charges, etc. She said there should be a
complete examination of everything to determine what they want,
whether the site plan is being cancelled, whether the plat is being
recorded, etc.
V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE this item with a full report by the City
Attorney and the various departments involved after it is
determined exactly what the applicant wants.
Mr..Henning said approval of the site plan was on 6/18/85 and the
developer cannot pull a building permit until the plat is recorded.
r
15
1/10/86
/pm
Mr. Henning said the developer received a waiver of platting and
posted a $15,000.00 cash bond and is now stating that he is willing
to wait until the plat is recorded before he pulls a building
permit. He said in lieu of that, the applicant would like his
$15,000.00 bond returned.
C/M Gottesman said he feels the platting waiver should be clarifie
and he SECONDED the MOTION to TABLE this entire item. Is
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
V/M Massaro said this matter will be brought_ up at the next
regular Council meeting and she suggested the applicant send
Council a letter explaining what his intentions are.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
40. Fire Hydrant Marking -- Discussion and possible action on:
a) Approval to have the Engineering Department do the necessary
work
b) Approval for the Engineering Department to purchase markers
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent on Page 2
a) Authorization was given to the
Engineering Department to mark
all existing and future hydrants
and the associated valves with
the reflector markers.
b) APPROVAL was given for the Engineering
Department to purchase 2,000 blue
markers and 1,000 green markers and
the necessary epoxy tube sets to
install them at an upset price not
to exceed $6,000.00.
a) V/M Massaro said Bill Greenwood, Utilities
approval for the Engineering Department to
future hydrants and the associated valves
and she so MOVED, SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE•
C/M Stein
C/M Munitz
C/M Gottesman
V/M Massaro
Mayor Kravitz
Director, has requested
mark all existing and
with reflector markers
Aye
Aye
Absent
Aye
Aye
b) V/M Massaro MOVED to authorize the Engineering Department to
purchase 2,000 blue markers and 1,000 green markers and the nec-
essary epoxy tube sets to install them at an upset price not to
exceed $6,000.00. SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
41. Invoice for Kruse O'Connor &_Ling, Actuaries -- Discussion and
possible action regarding payment.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent on Page 2
APPROVED.
V/M Massaro said the Acting City Manager has requested payment to
Kruse, O'Connor & Ling the amount of $2,555.00. Mr. Henning noted
that this is the same Actuary that the City has been using for
several years and they are the most important consultant that the
City has with the Pension Plan. He said the Acting City Manager's
recommendation is that this be paid out of the Pension Plan.
1
16
1/10/86
/pm
Mayor Kravitz noted that this has been pending since 9/26/85.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL.of the payment of this invoice from the
Pension Fund Account #638-115-513-321, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL YQTED AYE
42. SUE - Tamarac Lakes Gravity Sewer - Proiect 84-5 -
.Aupr.oval to go to_ bi.d .- Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent on Pages 2 & 3
The Acting City Manager was authorized
to go to bid. The estimated cost was
$260,476.00.
V/M Massaro said before the City could go to bid, D.E.R. had to
approve this. She said approval has been given for the City to
advertise for construction bidding on the Tamarac Lakes Gravity
Sewer.Project 84-5.
V/M Massaro MOVED that the Acting City.Manager be authorized to go
to bid on this with the estimated cost of approximately
$260,476.00 with a $113,261.00 grant. She said the Account this
is to be charged to has an unencumbered balance of $259,405.00.
C/M Gottesman SECONDED.
C/M Stein said he assumed that the amount of $113,261.00 would be
subtracted from the amount of $260,476.00 thereby leaving a
balance of $147,215.00. V/M Massaro said that is true but until
the grant is actually received, the full amount of money must be
available.
VOTE: ALL TED AYE
GENEEM ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
43. City. _H,sI1 Emergency Raof Repairs - Discussion and possible
action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized.by Consent on Page 3
The Acting City Manager was authorized
to waive the bidding procedures
and use the procedures the Charter
permits to g.et bids. Once the
figures are received, the Council
will have a Special Meeting.to
take action on this.
V/M Massaro said the Acting City Manager has indicated that there
are.problems concerning leaks in the. City Hall roof in the Finance
Department and she MOVED to authorize the Acting City Manager to
waive the bidding procedures and use the procedures the Charter
does permit to get bids. She said when the figures are received,
the Mayor will call a Special Meeting of Council to act on this.
SECONDED. by C/M Stein.
Harold Newman asked -how many years ago the roof was -repaired on
this building -and V/M Massaro said that portion of the roof was
not repaired at that time.
VOTE: ALL_ VOTED AYE
17
1/10/86
/pm
5. City Code Drainage Requirements - Discussion and possible
action to authorize Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc., to
review and evaluate Article IV of Chapter 24 of the Code
concerning drainage (tabled from 1/2/86)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
at a cost of $3,200.00.
V/M Massaro said when Bill Greenwood, Utilities Director/City
Engineer, heard the upset price that was given at that time, he
decided perhaps Williams, Hatfield & Stoner had misunderstood
exactly what he wanted. She said since then, he discussed this
with them and they submitted a new proposal which is for a lesser
amount of $3,200.00.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL to authorize Williams, Hatfield &
Stoner to review and evaluate Article IV of Chapter 24 of the Code
concerning drainage, SECONDED by C/M Stein.
C/M Stein said it has never been rescinded that a prior Council
passed a prohibition against the City using Williams, Hatfield &
Stoner for anything but continuing projects. Mr. Henning said he
reported shortly after that Motion was Approved some time ago,
that there is a 30-day cancellation provision in the contract with
Williams, Hatfield & Stoner. He said it was discussed that it was
an affirmative action of Council not to place the exercising of
the 30-day cancellation on the agenda. C/M Stein noted that
something should be done to remove that.
Mr. Henning said when the original drainage study was done,
Williams, Hatfield & Stoner was involved and V/M Massaro said that
was true.
VOTE:
UTILITIES
ALL VOTED AYE
9. Utilities - Temp. Reso, #3883 - Discussion and possible action
to authorize execution of a contract with Shelton Enterprise,
Inc., to provide notification to the City when utility
locations are required (tabled from 1/2/86)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED. RESOLUTION NO. R-86-9 PASSED.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso._ 13883, 1/7/86 revision, by title.
Mr. Henning noted that this contract is for a 12-month period
starting 1/10/86.
V/M Massaro said this was Tabled awaiting the signed contract by
Shelton Enterprise and she MOVED APPROVAL of Tem s
#3883, SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VOTED_ AYE
10. Utilities East and West (Projects 84-21_ and_ 85-41 -- Pump
Station Reconstruction - Discussion and possible action to
authorize Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc., to prepare bid
plans and specifications for 6 pump stations in Tamarac East,
6 pump stations in the woodlands, and Pump Stations 1, 19 and
26 in Tamarac West (tabled from 1/2/86)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED.
The costs incurred for this work
will be distributed from the
Accounts as noted herein.
J
18
1/10/86
/pm
V/M Massaro referred to Peter Procopio, Deputy Utilities Eng-
ineer's memo of 1/6/86 in which the first item, TUE Account #417-
301-536-659, was for $10,000.00, which comes from the budgeted
amount of $150,000.00. She said the second item, TUW Account
#432-367-538-656 was for $10,790.00, comes from the CIAC Account.
She said the third breakdown is for $5,810.00, which will come
from the R & R (Repair and Replacement) Account.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
Mr. Henning said for the record, reference should be made to the
1/6/86 memo to Larry Perretti, Acting City Manager, from
Peter. Procopio, Deputy Utilities Engineer. (See Attachment 2).
VQTE: ,LL VOTED AYE
11. utilities West (Project 85--27) - Water Treatm nt Plant_
Filter Rehabilitation - Discussion and possible action to
authorize James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc., to
prepare plans and specifications for refurbishing of Water
Treatment Plant filters 3 and 4, including filter media
replacement.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
as amended at a cost of $4,900.00.
V/M Massaro said this proposal from James M. Montgomery Consulting
Engineers requires a fee not to exceed $4,900.00. She said this
is authorization for design engineering for refurbishing filters 3
and 4.
V/M Massaro asked Mr. Greenwood, Utilities Director/City Engineer,
if,he had an opportunity to discuss IE of this proposal with
James:M. Montgomery. Mr. Greenwood said this was discussed and a
letter was prepared yesterday to James M. Montgomery clarifying
that this is for a lump sum figure of $4,900.00 including the
insPection and the shop drawing review with approval of construc-
tion cost estimates.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of this project for a price not to
exceed $4,900.00 and the part of their proposal which relates to
IE should be removed, as per the statements made by the City
Engineer.
Mr. Henning questioned whether the Agreement's reference to
"engineers" meant the City Engineers or James M. Montgomery and
she said they are referring to James M. Montgomery. She said they
would do periodic inspections, review the shop drawings and
progress payments and issue the completion certificates. She said
they were requesting an additional amount to do this and they have
now _rescinded that portion of their proposal and the amount of
$4,.900.00. will include everything.
Mr. Greenwood said the lump sum figure of $4,900 includes the
periodic inspection, shop drawing reviews and approvals of the
estimates. He said on Page 2 of the proposal, Section III, Fees
and Payments, the following sentence was deleted, "Fees for
services provided under IE shall be in accordance with Paragraph
III.A.2. (Salary Cost Plus) of the General Contract."
19
1/10/86
/pm �1
C/M Gottesman SECONDED the MOTION.
VOTE
ALL VOTED AYE
12. Utilities West (Project 85-7) - Wellfield Protection
Facilities - Discussion and possible action to authorize going
to bid for this work.
aYNOPSI5 OF ACTION: The Acting
City Manager was authorized to go
to bid as indicated on the proposal
of 12/19/85, of Peter Procopio, Deputy
Utilities Director, and further defined
by the City Engineer.
Bill Greenwood, Utilities Director/City Engineer, said because of
the uncertainty of what is happening at the existing Wastewater
Treatment Plant, the proposed 2,000 gallon additional- tank for
diesel fuel was included to be installed under this contract. He
said a letter was prepared yesterday by Peter Procopio, Deputy
Utilities Director, clarifying this. (See Attachment 3).
Mr. Greenwood said they propose to bid it with and without the
concrete. He said the one tank that exists needs the concrete
containment and the monitoring wells installed around it; however,
if the sewage treatment plant is not upgraded and/or moved then
the additional tank will not be needed.
V/M Massaro MOVED to authorize the Acting City Manager to go to
bid as indicated on the proposal of 12/19/85 from Peter Procopio,
Deputy Utilities Engineer and as further defined by the City
Engineer, Mr. Greenwood. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
13. Utilities_ West (Project 85-19) -- P
tehabilitationd
Expansion of Wastewater Treatment Plant - Discussion and
possible acton on:
a) Clarification of Hazen and Sawyer Agreement
1) Correction of Council action for Task Order 1.1 (Design
for the installation of four transfer pumps) -
Authorization not to exceed $5,500.00 instead of
$4,500.00
2) Placement of Task Order 1.1 under Hazen and Sawyer
contract raising contract price to $68,100.00 from
$62,600.00
3) Cancellation of purchase order for Task 1.1 in the
amount of $4,500.00
b) Authorization to go to bid for this work
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
APPROVED a) and b).
a)
b)
V/M Massaro MOVED the correction of Task Order 1.1 from $4,500.00
not to exceed $5,500.00 and to correct the
Hazen and Sawyer to reflect that it would
the total of all tasks authorized to date.
engineering contract of
now be $68,100.00 for
20
1/10/86
/pm
J
1--.1
V/M Massaro said this would also cancel the original approval of
$4,500.00. She said this approval also includes authorization to
go to bid for this work. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE:
C/M Stein Aye
C/M Munitz Absent
C/M Gottesman Aye
V/M Massaro Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
Mayor Kravitz recessed the meeting to 1:30 P.M. for lunch.
Tape 4 Mayor Kravitz called the meeting to order at 1:30 P.M.
LL CALL: PRESENT:
Mayor Philip B. Kravitz
Vice Mayor Helen Massaro
Councilman Arthur H. Gottesman
Councilman Raymond J. Munitz
Councilman Sydney M. Stein
ALSO PRESENT:
Larry Perretti, Acting City Manager
Jon M. Henning, City Attorney
Marilyn Bertholf, City Clerk
CQMMUNITY DE`T_ELQPMENT Patricia Marcurio, Secretary
19. Tamarac Nurs' C nter - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Assessment of Land Use Amendment costs
b) Landscape Plan (tabled from 1/2/86)
gyNQPEIS OF ACTION:
a) APPROVED as conditioned.
b) TABLED to the 1/22/86
Council meeting.
a) Thelma Brown, City Planner, said this project is located at NW 79
Ave. between the canal and NW 57 St. She said the plan was
approved by staff on 12/6/85 and,received approval of the Planning
Commission on 10/16/85. She said on 12/11/85, the Council Tabled
this item for review of the Landscape Plan and the administrative
fees involved in the Land Use Plan Amendment. She said the
Beautification Committee, on 1/6/86, Approved the revised Land-
scape,Plan_subject to conditions of approval.
Ms. Brown said the fees have been established for the Land Use
Plan Amendment and they are as follows:
Administrative Costs to the City
(including staff time to coordinate,
research, Development Review Reports,
Agenda preparations and staff review
of plans) - $3,100.00
(2) Public Hearing Notices
@ $800.00 each - 1,600.00
City Attorney's time in preparing legal
documents -- 17 hours - 1,700.00
Rezoning and staff time of a separate
issue 3,000.00
Fees established by the City Code - 400.00
TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS - $9,800.00
21
1/10/86
/pm
Ms. Brown said the staff recommends approval of the Nursing Care
Center subject to the assessment of the land care costs and a
letter of agreement from the developer.
V/M Massaro said Doug Cowan, representative of the applicant,
has indicated that his client is willing to pay the amount of
$9,800.00. She said that amount is $8,200.00 plus advertising
costs, which are anticipated to be $1,600.00 but might be less if
other projects are advertised at the same time. She said she does
not accept the letter Mr. Cowan submitted.
V/M Massaro said this amount of $9,800.00 is in lieu of the
$4,000.00 estimate that was mentioned at a prior meeting.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of the City doing the Land Use Amend-
ment for $8,200.00 plus $1,600.00 for advertising or whatever the
actual cost of advertising is determined to be. She said this
must be paid before the Beautification Plans are acted on.
SECONDED by C/M Stein.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
b) Roseann Goldgeld, resident of Edgewater Village, said she had
several conferences with Richard Rubin, former Consultant City
Planner, and Doug Cowan and there was agreement to certain
specifications as to what would be planted there. She said she
has not been apprised of any changes, therefore, she would like to
know what the plans are now. V/M Massaro said Ms. Goldgeld could
review the plans with her at any time.
V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE the Landscape Plan to the 1/22/86
Council meeting, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
yQTE: ALL -VOTED AYE
20. Woodland Villas - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan - Temp. Reso. #3948
b) Landscape Plan
c) Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
d) Water Retention Agreement
e) Blanket Utility Easement - Temp. Reso. #3949
f) Public Safety Ingress/Egress Easement - Temp_._JReso.
#3950
g) Agreement for funding future traffic and signalization
needs
(To be located on the west side of Lagos de Campo Boulevard,
south of McNab Road, and north or Sandpebbles Townhouses)
(tabled from 1/2/86)
SYNOPSIS OF
ACTION:
-with
RESOLUTION NO. R-86-11 PASSED.
a)
& b) APPROVED
conditions,
RESOLUTION NO. R-86-12 PASSED.
c)
APPROVED
as amended,
RESOLUTION NO. R-86-13 PASSED.
d),
e) & f)
APPROVED.
g)
REMOVED
from the agenda.
a) Mr.
Henning read Temp. Reso.
#3948 by title.
Abraham Vehn, representative of Arriva Development, presented a
check to the City Clerk in the amount of $13,553.40.
Thelma Brown, City Planner, said the site plan indicates 5 town-
house units located on 1/2 acre of land. She said the existing
zoning is R-3 and does permit townhouse units.
22 /
1/10/86
/pm
1
1
Ms. Brown said the land is platted and has a legal description of
Lot A, Woodland Lakes, Plat Book 71, Page 18 of the public records
of Broward County. She said staff requests that if Council should
approve this today, the developer be required to do the following:
1. Backfill and sod the median strip and extend the curb around
the median.
2. The Water and Sewer Development Agreement should be attached.
3. The Water Retention Agreement be accepted.
4. The Blanket Utility Easement be accepted.
5. The Public Inress/Egress Easement be accepted.
6. The Traffic Signalixation Needs Fee of $140.00 be provided
for.
7. The Future Traffic Need Fee of $760.00 be established.
V/M Massaro noted that the fees noted above in 6 and 7 are includ-
ed in the check just submitted to the City Clerk.
V/M Massaro said the plan indicates that there is 6-inch curbing
at the median and this must be extended to the other side of the
median as well. She said it must be backfilled and sodded with
Bahia grass because there is no sprinkler system in there.
V/M Massaro asked the City Planner how far this must be extended
and Ms. Brown said they must extend it to the existing curb which
is there now. Mr. Vehn said they have no objection to that and he
so indicated on the plan.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #3948 with the
additional conditions indicated, SECONDED by C/M Stein.
YQTE :
ALL VOTED AYE
b) Ms. Brown said Landscape Plan indicates the following:
1.
The shade
requirement is
5 Black Olive Trees, 10 to 12-feet in
height and
interchanged
30-feet on center.
2.
5 Rosewood
Trees planted
30-feet on center
3.
72 Glossy
Privet hedges
30-inches in height, 24-inches on
center.
4.
60 Ixora hedges
24-inches
in height and 24-inches on center.
5.
there will
be a minimum
of 5 additional shade trees on the
east side
6.
Flowering
shrubs will be
planted on the Lagos,de Campo side.
7.
The Australian
Pine Trees
will be removed after the County is
contacted
for permission
of removal.
Ms. Brown noted that this Landscape Plan was approved by the
Beautification Committee on 10/21/85.
V/M Massaro MOVED that the Landscape Plan be APPROVED subject to
the additional conditions noted, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
c) Mr. Henning said he reviewed the water and Sewer Developers
Agreement and it should be amended on Page 4, Paragraph 2,
indicating "Yes", the Guaranteed Revenues will start in 6 months.
He said on Exhibit D, it should read, "total ERCs 6 water and 5
sewer".
23
1/10/86
/pm
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of the Water and Sewer Developers
Agreement, SECONDED by C/M Stein.
VOTE•
ALL VOTED AYE
d) V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of the Water Retention Agreement as
submitted, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE
ALL VOTED AYE
e) Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso, #3949 by title.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp, es # 94 as submitted,
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE:
C/M Stein Absent
C/M Munitz Aye
C/M Gottesman Aye
V/M Massaro Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
f) Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3950 by title.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Res # 950 as submitted,
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE:
C/M Stein Absent
C/M Munitz Aye.
C/M Gottesman Aye
V/M Massaro Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
g) Mr. Henning said the applicant has already paid the fee for
funding future traffic and signalization needs and the final
payment will be made at the completion of the Ordinance, there-
fore, he felt this item was not necessary.
V/M Massaro stated for the record that the payment has been made
for the funding of the traffic improvements and signalizaton and
if the Ordinance is not passed within 6 months, the money would be
refunded.
V/M Massaro MOVED to REMOVE this item from the agenda, SECONDED by
C/M Munitz.
VOTE•
C/M Stein Absent
C/M Munitz Aye
C/M Gottesman Aye
V/M Massaro Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
Melanie Reynolds, Charter Board Aide, asked if the fee paid by the
developer included the Parks and Recreation Fee and V/M Massaro
said yes, the amount was $2,862.00.
24
1/10/86
/pm
LJ
1
PUBLIC HEARING
14. Investments of City Funds - Temp. Ord. #1233 - Discussion and
possible action to amend Chapter 9 of the Code concerning
allowable investments. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED
to a future meeting. Public
Hearing was held.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Ord. #1233, the 11/26/85 revision, by
title.
Mayor Kravitz asked Mr. Henning if this Ordinance was given to him
through the Investment Advisory Committee and Mr. Henning said
several weeks ago there was an item on the agenda for recommenda-
tions by the Investment Advisory Committee. He said Council had
directed the City Attorney and staff to take the Minutes contain-
ing their recommendations to be incorporated into an Ordinance.
He said this was done and is Temp. Ord. #1233.
Ed Solomon, Chairman of the Investment Advisory Committee, said
the statement made by the City Attorney is inaccurate since the
recommendations were made months before Council authorized them to
be incorporated. He said Temp. Ord. #1233 does not reflect the
thinking of the Investment Advisory Committee.
Mr. Solomon said the Committee requested the Disraelly Amendment
be eliminated and he sees no signs of that in this Ordinance. He
said they asked that it not be allowed that one person alone make
a decision any longer.
Mr. Solomon said he just received a copy of a letter sent to Mayor
Kravitz by Oscar Tucker on 12/16/85 and he asked why this letter
was withheld from the Committee. After reviewing this letter
briefly, Mayor Kravitz said these are comments from Oscar Tucker
concerning City investments and he questioned why Mr. Solomon felt
this should have been given to the Committee. Mr. Solomon said
he feels the Committee had a right to this information.
Mayor Kravitz asked Mr. Solomon to give the Council a report on
what the Committee wanted included in the Ordinance and
Mr. Solomon said the Investment Advisory Committee never asked for
the appointing of an administrative committee.
V/M Massaro said she feels Mr. Solomon is saying that at one time
the Investment Advisory Committee made certain recommendations to
this Council to be included into an Ordinance to be prepared and
Council authorized the City Attorney to prepare this Ordinance
including these recommendatons. She said Temp. 0rd,.#1233. does
not reflect these recommendations.
V/M Massaro said it was indicated
at the first reading of this
Ordinance
that this was to be reviewed
with an amended Ordinance
submitted
to Council. C/M Stein
said most of Council is not happy
with .this
Ordinance.
Tape 5 C/M Stein
said some time ago the
Disraelly Amendment was approved
taking away the right of Council
to control the finances of this
City. He
said this has never been
revoked and he feels before any
Ordinance
is considered, Council
should take the power back to the
Council.
He said nothing should
be done without a vote of Coun-
cil.
Mr. Henning said there was a 11/26/85 draft of this Ordinance and
this is the draft being referred to today. He said Council
requested the Mayor and he work on this Ordinance and on 12/31/85
he sent a memo to Council.
'i
25
1/10/86
/pm
Mr. Henning said there were problems with many of the aspects of
the Ordinance as it was written. He said whatever is passed can
and will irradicate Section 9-1. He said this is in place of that
Section, which is what is being referred to as the "Disraelly
Amendment".
Mayor Kravitz opened the public hearing. Henry Shulman, resident,
said he has been on the Investment Advisory Committee since it
began and he felt the "bonding" might not be sufficient and he
felt this should be tabled for further input.
Morris Sauner, member of the Investment Advisory Committee, said
nothing is stated in the Ordinance concerning the longevity of the
investment. He said it should be determined how far into the
future the City wants to have the investment and this should be
inserted into the Ordinance. He said there should be better
internal control of the individuals who will be making the invest-
ments for the City.
Bernie Hart, resident, said in previous losses, the unaccount-
ability was the fact that no one signed checks since they are
electronically handled through computers. He said if there are no
checks involved, then the City Charter should be amended. He said
Section 1209 of the Charter specifies, "All bonds and checks shall
be signed by the Mayor and the Manager." He said he would like to
know if it is correct to transfer monies without checks being
signed to afford accountability in the administration of the City.
Mayor Kravitz said when the City purchases securities, the money
is wired and, therefore, there are no signatures on that instru-
ment. He said there are no checks. He said all checks that are
issued, as was stated correctly, are signed by the City Manager
and the Mayor.
Mr. Hart questioned if the Charter should not be changed since it
stipulates, "...all contracts or instruments to which this City is
a party.... Mr. Henning said he agrees with Mayor Kravitz's
explanation of wire transfers and he asked Mr. Hart to finish
reading the rest of the sentence in the Charter. Mr. Hart contin-
ued to read, "...all contracts or other instruments to which the
City is a party shall be executed by the Mayor and attested by the
Manager." He asked if there is an instrument being executed to
lend or invest some of the City's money, should there not be
something signed by the City Manager and the Mayor.
Mr. Henning said a party is an individual in an agreement and a
wire transfer is not necessarily an agreement. He said the Mayor
and the City Manager sign all agreements, leases, contracts, etc.
He said the wire transfers have been used more frequently since
the Charter was passed but is not in conflict with the Charter.
Mr. Shulman said he is a former partner of a New York Stock
Exchange firm with 50 years of experience on Wall St. and concern-
ing wire transfers, as long as the authority to transfer these
funds are in proper order, they are identical to signing of a
check. Mr. Henning said that is so.
Frank Etheredge, Finance Director, said before he can make a wire
transfer, the Mayor and City Manager must sign them. Mayor
Kravitz said that is so now but was not so with the previous
administration.
26
1/10/86
/pm ,
1
Ll
Vickie Beech, resident, said at no time did the Investment
Advisory Committee request to have an administrative committee
formed. She said the Investment Advisory Committee was formed
with the purpose of giving advice and suggestions to Council but
all authority was supposed to be with every member of Council
being responsible for any investment that took place. She said
this would repeal the Disraelly Amendment and designate the duties
back to Council.
Mrs. Beech said this should have taken immediate priority and
should have been resolved before this. Mayor Kravitz said he
attended an Investment Advisory Committee yesterday as liaison and
he stated his feelings concerning this. He said at the conclusion
of this public hearing, he is suggesting this be tabled for
revision so that further input can be given.
Jack Rowan, resident, referred to the second "Whereas" clause on
Page 1 of Temp. Ord. #1233, which stated, "...is inadequate to
insure the safety and maximize the return on the investment of
City funds." He suggested the City only invest in issues from the
U.S. Government or from the State of Florida as General Obliga-
tions only. He referred to Section C and said he did not feel
brokers are needed to invest in U.S. Government Bonds.
Mr. Rowan referred to Paragraph H, "All negotiable instruments,
receipts and other pertinent information shall be held in a fire
proof bank vault for safe keeping and readily accessible to
designated member...". He said he would like -to change that to
"two designated members" with all reports given in writing and
signed by the members. He said a physical inventory should be
taken periodically and signed by the two members.
Mr. Rowan said last year there was supposed to be approximately
two million dollars in banks in Tamarac and he questioned whether
any government official had actually counted this money. He said
no one could give him an answer. He referred to Section 2 and
said he does not feel a new Committee is needed since the Finance
Director can handle this under the strict supervision of the City.
He said he feels Pension Funds should not be invested in anything
but U.S. Treasury Bonds and only with the permission of a
representative of the Pension Board.
Shirley Blumfield, resident, said since 1981, the responsibility
of the Council concerning investments was removed and she suggest-
ed this be given back to Council. She said even though monies are
transferred electronically, there must still be responsible
parties.
Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing with no further response.
C/M Gottesman said he was surprised that many of the recommenda-
tions made by the Investment Advisory Committee have not been
incorporated into this Ordinance and he suggested that they should
be. C/M Munitz said problems of a similar nature to the City's
problems with ESM cannot be legislated against.
Mayor Kravitz noted that the Council has been advised by legal
counsel to avoid too much discussion on ESM since there is litiga-
tion pending.
C/M Stein left the meeting at 3:00 P.M.
r,
27
1/10/86 I fr
/pm
Mayor Kravitz said he will call a Special Meeting with input from
the City Attorney and, after that, he will call a Special Council
Meeting for discussion of a new Ordinance. V/M Massaro said there
have been conflicting recommendations, however, if the original
recomnendations of the Investment Advisory Committee are adopted,
it should be sufficient. She said the recommendation that the
City invest in certain State General Obligations because the City
Charter does not permit that.
V/M Massaro said since the new Finance Director has been with the
City, there has been investments in nothing but U.S. Treasury
Bills, etc. She said the minutes of the Investment Advisory
Committee should have been transcribed verbatim to enable the
creation of an Ordinance that contains everything necessary.
C/M Gottesman MOVED to TABLE this item to a future meeting,
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL MTED AYE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
23. MidPlaza - Discussion and possible action and review of
traffic pattern shown on the site plan.
SYNQPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED
to the 1/22/86 Council meeting
for the City Attorney to meet
with staff and, if necessary,
have an emergency meeting with
the Planning Commission and the
developer to reach a conclusion.
Mr. Henning said the site plan was approved by Council a few weeks
ago and, since that time, Council received a letter from
representatives of the area requesting that the traffic on 79th
Ave. be readdressed. He said this is the shopping center at the
northwest corner of 57th St. and University Dr., which wraps
around the area where the Post Office is and backs onto 79th Ave.
Mr. Henning said this has been put on the agenda to allow the
concerns of the residents to be aired and, hopefully, this meeting
will provide a better understanding of what the development is
about.
Chief Building Official, Bob Jahn, said the site plan was approved
at staff review on 11/22/85 and the Planning Commission Denied
approval on 11/6/85. He said this went before Council and was
approved on 11/27/85 with no conditions. He said the Landscape
Plan was approved subject to the return of a plan for the Beauti-
fication Committee to resolve the problem of Zackley's Restaurant
regarding the color. He said that matter was returned to the
Beautification Committee on 12/2/85 and was Tabled for additional
information and was Tabled again on 1/6/86 at the request of the
developer's representative.
Mr. Henning asked Mr. Jahn to outline for Council the traffic
access on 79th Ave. to the shopping center.
Tape 6 Mr. Jahn said there are two entrances to the rear of the entire
Project, which would be westerly opening onto 79 Ave.
28
1/10/86
/pm
Mr. Jahn said the width of those two openings is 30-feet wide with
the flare for the normal driveway hook. He said the other
entrances for the project are on the westerly side of their
property or just to the east of the Post Office on 57 St. He said
there are also two entrances on University Dr.
V/M Massaro said when this was approved, the main consideration
for the ingress/egress on 79 Ave. was the consideration of the
people, particularly, in Edgewater Village. She said in the
letter from the representative of the residents, it indicates that
women using tricycles use this street for access to shopping and
that is what was being considered when those access points were
recommended. She said people with tricycles and walkers would
have access without exposure to heavily traversed areas, particu-
larly, University Dr.
V/M Massaro said in the fall of 1986, University Dr. is going to
be rebuilt and widened which takes:a long time. She said the
sewer lines, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic lights, etc.
must be replaced and it would be hazardous to expose people,
especially handicapped people, to this situation. She said it was
felt that..ingress and egress without exposure to these dangers
would be to the benefit of the people.
V/M Massaro said the residents should have come in when these
things. were being considered, and, since there was no opposition,
Council did what they thought was for the best interests of the
people.
Sol Wish, resident of Edgewater Village, said he was at the
original Planning Commission meeting during which this was dis-
cussed -and he voiced his opposition to the traffic hazard that
exists on 79 Ave. prior to this proposed development. He said
there is a traffic problem at the Post Office because of traffic
that cannot go south or north on 79 Ave. He said he does not feel
these two driveways on 79 Ave. were put in for the benefit of the
residents but, rather, for the deliveries by the Publix trucks.
Rhoda Sobel, resident of -Edgewater Village, questioned how handi-
capped,.people can use 79 Ave. with all of the heavy traffic that
will be in that area. She also questioned how emergency vehicles
will be able to get into this area.
Roseann Goldgeld, Vice President of Edgewater Village, read a
letter into.the record, -"As a representative of Edgewater
homeowners,.we:wish .to add our voice to the protest of Midway
Plaza's ingress and egress on 79 Ave. Our residents, as well as
those of Fairways, Concord Village, Sands Point and neighboring
communities use,79 Ave. as access to the wonderful bicycle path
you provided for us as well as to the Post Office. Women using
tricycles use this street. Handicapped using wheel chairs also
use this street. We feel that an access road only 3 blocks long
and 2 cars wide is not capable of handling any additional
passenger and commercial -traffic. Especially with the existing
problem of the Post Office entrance on 79 Ave. Consider what a
.bottleneck would cause when an emergency vehicle attempts to enter
Edgewater Village. Moreover, the present dangerous situation will
be further aggrevated by the construction of the nursing home,
which has no other option but to use 79 Ave. as the only access to
their property. With the renewal of construction in Edgewater
Village, we are on our way to becoming a community of 138 homes.
79 Ave. is our primary access road. Cars from the movies directly
facing 79 Ave. with an entrance going into 79 Ave. would create an
additional havoc on this street if access to Midway Plaza was
permitted on 79 Ave.".
29
1/10/86
/pm J�
"In the immediate area, Marshall's Plaza, Albertsons, Winn Dixie,
Zayres, Family Mart and Publix all have entrances and exits on
only two major thoroughfares with two four lane roads presently
available, University Dr. and 57 St. for entrance to exit to
Midway Plaza, we feel that the two lane street of 79 Ave., with
vehicles going in either direction, would create a dangerous
traffic situation. Let us not experience the tragedy of hind-
sight, instead, use foresight to prevent this from occuring. We,
therefore, appeal to your good officers to help rectify this
impractical and potentially chaotic traffic pattern."
Mrs. Goldgeld appealed to Council to consider this matter. She
said when this matter came up previously, some of the people
involved were away because of the Thanksgiving holiday and they
were not aware of this until most of the people returned.
V/M Massaro asked Jim Brady, representative for Midway Plaza, if
there was a possibility of reconsidering this and trying to
eliminate the ingress/egress at 79 Ave. Jim Brady said the people
who are financially behind this project would have to answer this.
question no. He said there are millions of dollars involved. He
said the developer takes the position that this was approved by
the City and they can begin building.
Marvin Sobel, resident, said there are problems with the plan,
such as, going along 57 St. a vehicle cannot make a left turn and
go north because University Dr. at that point only goes south. He
said anyone parked at the back of this area will be using 79 Ave.
to get back to University Dr. and head north.
Vivian Wish, resident, said this is a dangerous situation.
Mr. Henning said he had discussions with Mr. Brady to see if
something could be done through signage to satisfy some of the
needs of the residents. He said he thinks this item should be
tabled to the next regular meeting for staff review.
V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE this item to the 1/22/86 Council
meeting for the City Attorney to meet with staff and, if
necessary, have an emergency meeting with the Planning Commission.
She said the developer should be at the meeting as well to
determine a solution. SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
Mayor Kravitz said discussion and possible action will be held at
11:00 A.M. at the 1/22/86 Council meeting.
VOTE
ALL VOTED AYE
22. Golf Villas at Sabal Palm - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Revised site plan reflecting relocation of dumpsters -
Temp. Reso. #3962
b) Substitution of a Letter of Credit for a cash bond posted
as a homeowners warranty
,SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: RESOLUTION NO. R-86-14 PASSED.
a) APPROVED as amended.
b) DENIED. If they return
with a Letter of Credit
for 3 years, this may be
reconsidered.
r
30
1/10/86
/pm
a) Mr.
Henning
read Temp. Reso. #3962 by title..
V/M
two
Massaro
that are
said there are two dumpsters that are relocated and
simply angled. She said the angle has been changed
to
allow for
servicing of the dumpsters.
V/M
Massaro
MOVED APPROVAL of T m so #3962 amending the site
plan,SECONDED
by C,/M Gottesman.
VOTE:..
►�� 0 Ply.,V401
b) V/M Massaro said in the Letter of Credit the bank could cancel
after one year if they elect not to renew the Letter of Credit.
She said this cannot be accepted because this is a homeowners
warranty and must be for three years.
V/M.Massaro MOVED DENIAL of this Letter of Credit.
Mr. Henning noted that some banks stipulate that they cannot give
a Letter of Credit in excess of one year. V/M Massaro said she
does not want the City to be in a position of monitoring these
matters.
V/M Massaro restated her MOTION by stating that if they come in
with a three year Letter of Credit, this might be reconsidered.
C/M Gottesman SECONDED the MOTION.
Bruce:Jarvis, petitioner., said their primary lender will not issue
them a Letter of Credit for a period longer than one year. He
said in terms of his development, which is a straight rental, he
does not believe what is being requested here meets the intent of
that Ordinance as it was originally conceived. He said he is the
owner of the project, therefore, whether the Letter of Credit is
for one or three years, he is insuring himself.
Mr. Henning said there have been two or three rental developments
and they have questioned the HOW.bonds being required. He said
after„reviewing the Code he,explained to them that under the City
Code, the developers are required to have a HOW bond. He said
owner/builders are only for single family homes and, in essence,
Mr. .Jarvis is a builder for a multi --family home.
V/M Massaro said rental can.become condominium in the future and
the fact that this Letter of Credit is for three years is for
everyone's protection including the City. She said that insures
that the structural portions of this building are sound so that if
there is a defect after the first year, there will be protection
for the buyer.
Mr. Jarvis said he has a Land Use Restriction Agreement which
means that this project will remain as a rental for a period of 10
years. He said in the loan documents, this project cannot be sold
fo,r a period of 5 years. He said he already has a 2 or 3% escrow
with his lender for warranty items such as those mentioned.
V/M Massaro said her understanding of the law concerning this
project remaining rental for 10 years, if the owner were to obtain
a conventional mortgage, it would not have to remain a rental
project.
VOTE_: ALL.VOTED AYE
31 r;
1/10/86
/pm
25. Jasmine - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Model sales permit and waiver of the 300-foot distance
requirement for issuance of certificates of occupancy.
b) Grant of Temporary Easement - Temp. Resos #3961
SYNOPSIS OF _ACTION:
APPROVED a) and b).
a) V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of the model sales permit and waiver of
the 300-foot distance requirement for issuance of certificates of
occupancy for 6 months from 1/10/86. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
b) Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3961 by title.
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso, #3961 giving the City an
easement during the time of the temporary sales and administration
office. SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE
ALL VOTED AYE
EDITOR'S NOTE: A check was submitted to the City Clerk in the
amount of $1,986.40 for Guaranteed Revenues from l/l/86 to 2/l/86.
26. Bayside at Isles „of_Tamarac - Discussion and possible action
on:
a) Amendment to the Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
b) Model sales permit and waiver of the 150-foot distance
requirement for issuance of certificates of occupancy.
c) Easement and Option Agreement in connection with the model
sales facility - T-emp._Reso. #3934
(tabled from 1/2/86)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED
for sufficient information.
Mr. Henning said the Water and Sewer Agreement was in the process
of being defaulted and the developer has negotiated payment for
the Guaranteed Revenues that were due in arrears plus additional
money as a negotiated settlement in lieu of default. He said the
total amount is $16,000.00 for 18 ERCs for single family homes.
V/M Massaro said there should be a correction on Page 4 indicating
that the monies only took care of the Guaranteed Revenues to
December 1st. She said if that is amended to read that they owe
the Guaranteed Revenues from the first of December, she MOVED
Tape 7 APPROVAL and acceptance of the payment of $16,000.00 for the 18
ERCs to resolve the problem. She said they would then be in the
position of having to immediately pay the 2 months of Guaranteed
Revenues.
C/M Gottesman asked the amount per ERC and V/M Massaro said they
cost $1,640.00 per ERC. C/M Gottesman asked why they are only
paying $16,000.00 for 18 homes and V/M Massaro said this is a
compromise. She said there was a settlement with the other
developer in the same project and there were problems as to how
the default was handled. She said she feels this compromise is a
reasonable solution without going to litigation.
Richard Coker, representative of the
same situation as previously with the
Isles of Tamarac about 2 months ago.
developer, said this is the
owner of the rest of the
32
1/10/86
/pm
At C/M Munitz's
request, V/M Massaro restated her MOTION as
follows: that
Council
accept the compromise settlement of
$16,000.00
of December
on 18
lst.
ERCs and that the Guaranteed Revenues be due as
She said this means that they are now in a
1
position to
pay
$477.40 for the Guaranteed Revenues.
Mr. Henning
said
on Page 4 of the Agreement, Paragraph I--2, it
states that
this
settlement is up to l/1/86 and this should state
instead of
"1/1/86"
it will be "12/l/85".
V/M Massaro said her MOTION is contingent on the Guaranteed
Revenues being paid not later than 1/15/86 otherwise this is null
and void. C/M Munitz SECONDED the MOTION.
VOTE:
C/M Stein Absent
C/M Munitz Aye
C/M Gottesman Nay
V/M Massaro Aye
Mayor Kravitz Nay
Mayor Kravitz noted that the 2-2 vote has not approved this and he
suggested this be Tabled to the next regular meeting for further
information.
V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE this item to the 1/22/86 Council
meeting and then she WITHDREW her MOTION stating that she felt it
is unfair to hamper the -developer from moving -forward.
C/M Gottesman MOVED to TABLE a), b) and c) of this item for
sufficient information, SECONDED by C/M Munitz. -
VOTE:
C/N Stein -Absent,
C/M Munitz Aye
C/M Gottesman Aye
V/M Massaro Nay
-
Mayor Kravitz Aye
27. Arbors at Isles of Tamarac - Discussion and .possible action
on:
a) Renewal of a model sales permit and waiver of the 150-foot
distance requirement fo.r issuance of cart.ificates of
occupancy (tabled from 12/11/85)
b) Substitution of a home warranty bond for a cash bond posted
as a homeowner warranty
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
a) APPROVED for 6 months
from 12/13/85
b) APPROVED.
a) V/M Massaro MOVED renewal of the model sales permit and waiver of
the 150-foot distance requirement for issuance of certificates of
occupancy for 6 months, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AY
b) V/M Massaro MOVED release of the $1,500.00 cash bond with accept-
ance of the HOW bond in.its place.'.SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
I�
33
1/10/86
/pm
Chief Building Official Jahn said this is the normal homeowners
warranty for three years.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
LEGAL AFFAIRS
x
15. vehicle Repairs - Temp_ Ord,_41236 - Discussion and possible
action to create Section 15-8 of the Code to prohibit all
motor vehicle repairs in residentially zoned areas. Second
Reading. (Public hearing held 1/2/86)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED
to the 1/22/86 Council meeting
for a revised Ordinance by the
City Attorney.
C/M Gottesman MOVED to TABLE this item to the 1/22/86 Council
meeting for a revised Ordinance from the City Attorney, SECONDED
by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
29. Executive Center - Performance ,j}ond -r Temp. Reso.
#3959 - Discussion and possible action to call a performance
bond posted for public improvements.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. R-86-17 PASSED.
calling Bond No. B-47-35-01 in
the amount of $37,839.75 if an
extension has not been provided
on or before 1/13/86.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3959 by title.
Mr. Henning said during the construction process the property was
sold an.d ,.b&,}received"`a Call from Everglades Paving following their
receipt of a note from $ob.Foy, Deputy City Engineer, stating that
..their bond wi11 be called. He said Everglades Paving said they
were released from their contract because they did not do the
paving there.
V/M Massaro MOVED to APPROVE Temp. Reso=.#3959, SECONDED by
C/M Gottesman.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
REPORTS
35. City Attorney Report - No report.
34. CityManager Report - No report.
33. City Council,„RePorts - No reports.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
30. outhgete_Apartments (Cardinal Industries) - Perform-
ance and - Temp. Reso..#3960 - Discussion and possible action
to call a performance bond posted for public improvements.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: (See Page 11).
APPROVED as amended RESOLUTION NO. R-86-18 PASSED.
with an extension of the
performance bond to 1/22/86.
34
1/10/86 V_
/pm
1
Jim Brady, representative of Cardinal Industries, said he brought
Bob Foy, Deputy City Engineer, an extension of the bond yesterday
until 1/22/86 with an amendment of the Bill of Sale, which was
sent to him.
V/M Massaro MOVED to RECONSIDER this item, SECONDED by
C/M Gottesman.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
Mr. Henning said the surety bond can be called after it expires
and the City will be protected. He suggested an amendment on Line
22 of the Resolution, instead of "January 13" it should be
"January 20".
V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso._#3960 subject to their
producing a new bond on or before 1/20/86 or complete the nec-
essary work and get a signed statement from the Engineering
Department that it has been completed. She said if this is not
done, the bond is to be called. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
Mayor Kravitz adjourned the meeting at 4:20 P.M.
AC&-.,2 �e- 01�
tl MAYOR
TTEST:
CITY CLE
This public document was promulgated at
$12.52 per copy, to inform the general
and employees about recent opinions and
Council of the City of Tamarac.
a cost of $148.44 or
public and public officers
considerations by the City
CITY OF TAMARAC
A RAVED Afi MEETING OE /
City Werk
35
1/10/86
/pm
ATTACHMENT 1 - Regular City Council Meeting on 1/10/86 -
Item 37 - Public Works Department Mower - Budget Transfer
CIT-Y OF TAMARAC
• DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET ALLOTMENT REVISIONS
D, . T E : 1/3/86 FUND: GR*P.A]', FUND
TRANSFER FROM:
,ACCOUNT NUMBER NAME
i 001-872--581-901 I CONTINGENCY
ACCOUNT NUMBER NAME
001-131-541-640 1 P.W. VEHTCLES
PREVIOUS TRANSFER
ALLOTMENT BALANCE AMOUNT BALANCE
l 122,100 1122,100 [9,333-00 112,767
TRANSFER TO :
DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS
CITY MANAGER..
REV. 9/85
/pal
PREVIOUS TRANSFER
(ALLOTMENT BALANCE AMOUNT BALANCE
f - - - 0- T-
0333.00 9,333.00
DEPART. HEAD
SIGNATURE
FINANCE
DIRECTOR
CITY COUNCIL
ATTACHMENT 2 - Page 1 of 2 - Regular City Council Meeting on 1/10/86
Item 10 - Utilities East and West (Projects 84-21 and
85-4
C I T Y O F T A M A R A C
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8601-6003
TO: Larry Perretti Acting City Manager
FROM: Peter Procopio, Deputy Utilities Engineer
SUBJECT:
Agenda
Item
for
TUE and TUW Pump Stations
DATE:
January
6,
1986
(6581)
COPIES: City Clerk; Finance Director; Vice Mayor Massaro
#CI86-12
------------ ------------------------------------------------
will
#84-21 (5) TUE Pump Stations 2E, 3E, 4E, 5E and 6E
#85-5 (9) TUW Pump Stations (Woodlands) 15, 15A, 15A1,
15AM 15B and 15B1; plus Pump Stations 1, 19 and
26 located outside of Woodlands.
TUE Work Authorization No. 028 dated 12/30/85 is in
an amount not to exceed $10,000.
TUW Work Authorization No. 029 dated 12/30/85 is in
an amount not to exceed $16,600.
Both Work Authorization No. 028 and 029 have
stipulations that the fees for either work authori-
zation will be increased if there is a delay in
excess of thirty (30) days by Council in approving
both contracts.
Assuming Council.approves both Work Authorizations,
at the same time, the work will be performed for a
total of $26,600 at established rates and charges.
The costs incurred for this work will be distribu-
ted from the fallowing accounts:
$10,000 - TUE Account #417-301-5367659 that has a
balance of $150,000.
$10,790 - TUW Account #432-367-538-656- Pump
Station Modifications (CIAC), that
has a balance of $227,500.
($16,60OX65% = $10,790)
ATTACI-RIENT 2 - Page 2 of 2 - Regular City Council Meeting on 1/10/86
Item 10 - Utilities East and West (Projects 84-21 and
85-4)
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM: 8601-6003
Aqendize by Consent TUE and TUW Pump Stations
January 6, 1986
Page 2
$ 5,810 - TUW Account #E428-367-535--656, Pump
Station Modifications R&R, that has
a balance of $122,500.
($16,600X35% = $5,810)
We recommend that Council authorize placing both work orders
for TUE and TUW Pump Station Modifications with Williams,
Hatfield and Stoner in accordance with the above listed
Information and attached work orders.
Peter Procopi ,(u�
PP:Pal
ATTACHMENT 3 - Regular City Council Meeting on 1/10/86
Item 12 - Utilities West (Project 85-7) - Wellfield Protection
Facilities
TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST Ls
OPERATIOIVS DEPT,7805 NORTHWEST 6151, STREET- TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE:726-2300
January 9, 1986
#CI86--19
James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Sunrise Professional Center, Suite 208
5975 West Sunrise Boulevard
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33313
Attention: Mr. Dave Smith
Subject: City of Tamarac - TUW Project No. 85-7
Wellfield Protection Facilities
Gentlemen:
Per our telephone conversation of this date, you are
directed to break up Bid Item Al, as shown on Page BF-3, into
two parts:
Part 1 will be the containment only for the existing
tank.
Part 2 will be the new 2000 gallon tank, the containment
for the new 2000 gallon tank, and the interconnecting piping
of the existing tank and the new tank.
The Addendum should read that City Council has the right
to delete either or both parts of this Bid Item IA, as sub
divided above, without affecting the remainder of the bid
proposal.
PP: paI
OC: City Manager
City Clerk
Vice Mayor Massaro
Very truly yours,
CITY of TAMARAC
Peter Procopio, P. E.
Deputy Utilities Engineer