HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-02-11 - City Commission Regular Meeting MinutesA
n
0 it
P. O. 8OX 25010
TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33320
FIRST CLASS MAIL
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 1981
CALL TO ORDER: 9:30 A.M.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF TIME ALLOCATIONS - P40TIONS TO TABLE - The Chair
at this time will announce those items which have been given a
specific time to be heard, and will entertain motions from
Council members to table those items which require additional
research. Council may agendize by majority consent, matters of
an urgent nature which have come to Council's attention after
publication.
TAMARAC UTILITIES - WEST
1. Consulting City Engineer Report - Discussion and possible /71-Pgs.2,3-
action on Remote water Storage Tank. hop.to be sched
2. Finance Department - Personnel - Discussion and possible 2/11-Pgs.4,5
action on a request to hire one (1) part-time Clerk -Typist Appvd. or hire
for work on the PSC refund. resent elk for a
40 hr . wl-,; not to
PRESENTATIONS exceed 12 wk.pd.
3. Chamber of Commerce - Presentation of Proclamation by Mayor
2/11-Pg.4.Proc.
Falck declaring February 16th to February 22nd, 1981, as
d. ,aceptd.by Geo
"Shop Smart/Shop Tamarac" week.
Herschenson.
". National Brotherhood Week - Presentation of Proclamation by
2/11-Pg.l.-Proe.
Mayor Falck declaring the week of February 22, 1981, as
read and present.
"Brotherhood in Tamarac Week".
to Jerry Carlin.
5. Consent Agenda - Items listed under Item #5, Consent Agenda,
/11-Pg.5-
are viewed to be routine and the recommendation will be en-
) and b) Appvd.,
acted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be
as corrected;
no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is de-
) through j)Appvi
sired, then the item(s) will be removed from the Consent
3,9 presented.
Agenda, and will be considered separately.
a) Minutes of 1/14/81 - Regular Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by the City Clerk.
b) Minutes of 1/30/81 - Reconvened Regular Meeting - Approval
recommended by the City Clerk.
c) Alan F. Ruf -- Consulting Attorney - 2/6/81 - $589.00 -
Approval recommended by City Attorney.
d) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer -
12/15/80 -- $108.38 - Account #428-371-536-462 - Approval
recommended by City Engineer.
PAGE TWO.
e) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner -- Consulting Engineer - 12/15/80
$1,383.63 - Approval recommended by City Engineer for the
following accounts:
$273.29 - Account #425-363-533-310
$273.29 - #425-364-533-310
$273.29 - #425-367-535-310
$563.76 - #425-368-535-310
f) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 12/15/80
$1,620.25 - Account #428-371-536-462 - Approval recommended
by City Engineer.
g) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner -- Consulting Engineer - 1/7/81 -
$571.50 - Account #429-371-536-623 - Approval recommended by
City Engineer.
h) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 1/7/81 -
$551.66 - Account #350-500-531 - Approval recommended by
City Engineer.
i) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer -- 1/12/81-
$100.00 - Account #1-155-513-310 - Approval recommended by
City Engineer.
j) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 1/14/81-
$2,699.88 - Account #429-371-536-623 - Approval recommended
by City Engineer.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
6. Bid Authorization - Employee Group Insurance - Discussion /11-Pgs•5,6-
and possible action to authorize the City Manager to go out ty.Mgr.auth.to
to bid for hospitalization, medical, surgical and life o for bid;Stip.
insurance. o inc.Cncl.Memb.
7. Bid Award - Uniform Rental - Tem . Reso. #1839 - Discussion /11-Pg•6-
and possible action to award a bid for uniform rentals for dptd.;to Mech.
Public Works and Tamarac Utilities. niform.R-81-23.
8. Chief of Police - Probationary Period - Temp. Reso. #1842 - /11-Pgs.6,7.
Discussion and possible action on lifting the one (1) year Probationary pd.
probationary period. rmoved for Ch.of
9. Contract with Broward County Sheriff - Temp. Reso. #1841 -- /11-Pg.7-
Discussion and possible action on authorization to enter Adptd.-R-81-25.
into a contract concerning deputizing certain City police
officers.
10. Aviation Industrial Board - Appointment of City Representa- /11-Pgs.7,8-
tive - Temp. Reso. #1843 - Discussion and possible action. 4dptd.,with app.
.Kalck.
11. Juvenile Work Program - Temp. Reso. #1840 - Discussion and
possible action on approval to enter into a contract with
the Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services concern-
ing placement of youth at the Park to perform small jobs.
12. Fluoridation of Public Water Supply - Discussion and pos-
sible action on a letter from HRS Broward County Health
Department pertaining to fluoridation.
13. St. MalachVs Church Festival - Discussion and possible
action on a request to waive fee and permit requirements fo
a Festival.
LEGAL AFFAIRS
/11-Pg.8-Appvd.
as amended.
R-81-27.
2/11-Pgs.11,12,
13,14.
bld.to 2/25/81.
/11-Pg.4-Fees
ra.ived , but insp .
prior to grantin
permit.
14. Off -Street Parking Requirements - Temp. Ord. #832 -- Discus- /11-Pg.25
sion and possible action to amend Code Section 18, to allow Denied.
zero degree or ninety degree parking under Sec.18-3(i)(c).
First Reading.
PAGE THREE.
15. Land Use Plan Amendment -- Tem . Ord. #852 - Discussion and 2/11-Pgs.8,9-
possible action to authorize establishing fees for requests Adopted on first
for amendment to the City or County Land Use Plans. reading.
16. Senior Citizen Homestead Revenues - Temp. Reso. #1832 - Dis- 2/11-Pg.9-Copies
cussion and possible action on loss of these revenues by sent to Bwd.Cty.
d.
municipalities. Leg.Del.and Bw.ofCities.
28.
17. Land Development Regulations - Temp. Reso. #1836 - Discus- 2/11-Pg.9-Adptd.
sion and possible action on endorsement of these regulations ith reco�xmenda-
proposed by Broward County Technical Advisory Committee. ions-R-81-29.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
18. Mainlands Center - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan
b) Landscape Plan
c) Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
(located at N.E. corner of University Drive & N.W.58th St.)
19. Polish American Club - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan
b) Plat - Temp. Reso. #1844
c) Landscape Plan
(located just east of Inter -City Auto on the south side of
Commercial Boulevard)
T10TE:(Discussion and possible action on this item is depen-
dent upon receipt of the Site Plan no later than
4:00 P.M., Friday, 2/6/81)
20. Tamarac Shopping Plaza- (N.W. 66th Terrace & Commercial Blvd;
Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan for
a dumpster.
21. Granek Properties - Petition #1-Z-81 - Discussion and pos-
sible action to grant a limited waiver to parking require-
ments for a proposed office plaza on the west side of State
Road 7, north of Commercial Plaza, by Temp. Reso. #1826.
22. Woodmont Country Club - Sign Waiver - Tem]. Reso. #1845 -
Discussion and possible action to approve a waiver of the
sign ordinance for a sign on University Drive, between 78th
Street entrance and the 17th tee.
23. Brookwood Gardens - Discussion and possible action on a
request to substitute a cash bond posted for signalization
at Brookwood Boulevard and McNab Road, with a performance
bond.
24. Fairways of Tamarac - Bldgs. A & B - Tea. Reso. #1813 -
Discussion and possible action to release a cash warranty
bond for drainage.
25. Edgewater Village -- Discussion and possible action on a re-
quest o waive certain warranty bond requirements.
26. Shops of Tamarac - Bond Release - Temp. Reso. #1795 - Dis-
cussion and possible action to release a cash bond posted
for installation of median improvements on N.W. 70th Street
subject to receipt of a warranty bond.
/11-Pgs.14,15-
ite plan appvl.
nd then rescin.
)b)c) Tabld. to
2/25 if fees pd.
?/ll-Pgs.15/16--
0b)c) Tabled to
2/25 provided
fees paid.
2/11-Pgs.16,17-
Appvd. with
recommendations.
2/11-Pgs.17,18,
19.
Tabld. to 2/25.
/ll-Pgs.19/20-
Item to go back
to Beautificatioi
Committee.
2/11-Pg.17-
$20,000 cash bons
to be ret.,when
roper bond appv
by City Attny.
2/11-Pg.9.
2/11-Pg.20-Told.
due to iDkiyWd
ng. p o
2/11-Pg.23-
amendments of
bonds not req.
2/11-Pgs.20,21-
Adptd.with coeds
R-81-30:
27. Westchester - Bond Release - Temp. Reso. #1809 - Discussion 2/11-Pg.1-Told.
and possible action to release a cash warranty bond for to 2/25.
sidewalk construction in this subdivision.
28. Sands Point - Building K - Bond Release - Tem .Reso. #1325 -
Discussion and possible action to release a cash landscape
bond posted to guarantee corrections needed at this location
/11-Pgs.21,22-
dptd. releasing
and in amt. of
3430.R-81-3l.
A
7_.
L
PAGE FOUR.
29. S rin lake I - Discussion and possible action on a perfor-
2/11-Pg.11-
mance bond for a culvert crossing and canal excavation.
Told. to 2/25.
30. Tamarac Park - Grant Authorization -- Temp. Reso. #1846 -
/ll-Pgs. 9,10-
Discussion and possible action on approval to seek grant
kdptd.to be tarn
funds for improvements and expansion.
Erom Pks.&:R.ec.
fund-R-81-32.
31. Drainage Improvements in the _City - Discussion and possible
/11-P9.25-
action.
Tabld. to 2/25.
REPORTS
32. City Council
33. City Manager
34. City Attorney
City Council may consider such other business as may come before
it.
Pursuant to Chapter 80-105 of Florida Law, Senate Bill No.368:
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City
Council with respect to any matter considered at such meeting
or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and for
such purpose he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
CITY OF TAMARAC
CAROL A. EVANS
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
35. Travel Reimbursement Rates - Discussion and possible action.
(2/11-pgs.1,
10)C.Mgr.to
research
36. Nova University at. Coral Springs _- Proclamation
(2/11-pgs.1,4:
37. Consideration from the United States Department of Housing &
(2/11-pgs.2,
Urban Development for Local Planning Assistance Funds for
10)RESO.81-33
Fiscal Year _B_eginning July 1, 1981 - Tem. Reso.#1848.
38. Letter of Interest for Financial Assistance for a Bicycle
(2/11--pgs.2,
Route System - Temp. Reso. #1849.
10,11,23--25)
Adptg.as amend.
RESO.81-34
2/11,Pg.26,
39. Kez Control for the Gas Pumps - Authorizing the City Manager
Agen.by Cons.
to go out for new bids, and rejecting the present bid.
Bids Rejected_
C/Mgr.auth.to
go to bid for
50 Kev Contr.
I
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 11, 1981
CALL TO ORDER: Vice -Mayor Helen Massaro called the meeting to order on
Wednesday, February 11, 1981, at 9:30 A.M., in the Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: V/M Helen Massaro
Councilman Irving M. Disraelly
Councilwoman Marjorie Kelch
Councilman Irving Zemel
ALSO PRESENT:
Acting City Manager,
Laura Z. Stuurmans
Ass't. City Clerk, Carol A. Evans
Clerk/Steno., Mimi Reiter
ABSENT & EXCUSED: Mayor Walter W. Falck
City Attorney, Arthur M. Birken
MEDITATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: V/M Massaro called for a Moment of
Silent Meditation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENTATIONS
4. National Brotherhood Week - Presentation of Proclamation by Mayor Falck
declaring the week of February 22, 1981, as "Brotherhood in Tamarac
Week".
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Proclamation was read and
presented by the Vice -Mayor, to Jerry Carlin.
C/M Zemel, as President of the Brotherhood Movement, indicated his
gratification on the acceptance of the Proclamation by Jerry Carlin.
He further noted that Mr. Carlin planted the seed of the Brotherhood
Movement, for the past four years.
V/M Massaro read the Proclamation, and presented it to Jerry Carlin,
for Mayor Falck.
V/M Massaro reviewed the scheduled items on this day's Agenda.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
27. Westchester - Bond Release - Temp. Reso. #1809 - Discussion and pos-
sible action to release a cash warranty bond for sidewalk construc-
tion in this subdivision.
:SFAN47M
29. Springlake I - Discussion and possible action on a performance bond
for a culvert crossing and canal excavation.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to 2/25/81,
at the request of the developer.
C/W Kelch MOVED to TABLE to the 2/25/81 meeting, and C/M Zemel
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
35. Travel Reimbursement Rates - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
See page 10 )
C/M Zemel MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT, for discussion and possible
action, for adjustment of Travel Reimbursement Rates, and C/W Kelch
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
36. Nova University at Coral Springs - Proclamation
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
See page 4)
-1- 2/11/81
mr/
37. Consideration from the United States Del2artment of Housing and
Urban Development for Local Planning Assistance Funds for Fiscal
Year Beginning July 1, 1981 -Temp. Reso.#1848.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
(See page 10)
C/M Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT a Resolution Requesting
Consideration from United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development for Local Planning Assistance Funds for the Fiscal
Year Beginning July 1, 1981, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
38. Letter of Interest for Financial Assistance for a Bicycle Route
System - Temp. Reso. #1849. f
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
(See pages 10, 11, 23 - 25)
C/M Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT a Resolution for a
Letter of Interest for Financial Assistance for a Bicycle Route
System - Temp. Reso. #1849, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
TAMARAC UTILITIES - WEST
1. Consulting City Engineer Report - Discussion and possible action on
RemoteWaterStorage Tank.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Workshop to be scheduled,
upon receipt of written report from Tony Nolan
and the City Engineer.
Tony Nolan indicated that the appropriate site for the underground.
storage tank is located on 77th Street and Nob Hill Road, which is
adjacent to Tract 27. The sketch, he said, was attempting to hide
the area, and felt that a landscaping scheme should be worked -in homoge-
neously with the rest of the property, as the park site itself. A
letter was distributed which delineated the projected construction
cost, which is just under $600,000.00, and in conjunction with the
official paper bond sale.
In response to a question by C/M Disraelly, the Consulting Engineer
stated that the intent of the plan does not show the tank to be
lowered, but to build around it. There are, he stated, some limita-
tions as to the depth it could be placed in the ground, but could be
lowered a few feet.
C/M Disraelly said if it is dropped four or five feet, the fill.
would be provided for the berming at the same time, to which Mr.Nolan
concurred.
Mr. Nolan said the berming could be brought up to 12 feet, but does
increase the cost, as well as the earth work, which was noted as
$57,000.00. He stated that it was anticipated to use three feet in
the ground, and using that material to berm -up around the tank, with
possibly seven feet of berming, plus or minus. The Landscape Archi-
tects indicate in their sketch how they perceive the screening, with
lots of trees and Coco Plums, that generally grow very dense.
Mr. Nolan responded to a question by C/W Kelch, by stating that the
site which is designated will not be the specific location of the
tank, but is shown in the extreme corner for maximum use of the site.
He additionally stated that significant input should be given from
the Engineering and Planning Departments, in order to properly site
it on this particular parcel. The planning, he said, should be worked
in conjunction with the park, architectural and landscape plans.
The Consulting Engineer indicated that the additional tank will satisfy
the Health Department requirements; and they would like to see 50% of
the daily plant treatment capacity in ground storage. He advised that
there_...a.re_..1, 0Q0_._000 gallons__. on -site.. w _th_1 ,_.Q_Q_Q R OOO...gallons at.. Grant
2/11/81
-2- mr/
F---:]
Plaza, and approximately 60,000 gallons at plant site in the clear well,
which would bring this up to 4,000,000 gallons.
Mr. Nolan further stated that the $610,000.00 originally_anti_ci.pate.d--for
this work, was included in the construction schedule, and was a part of
the Engineering Report which was incorporated in the Official Statement.
Monies to build this, he said, comes from revenues, and were not monies
capitalized in the sale of the bonds.
V/M Massaro said it was brought to her attention that everything has to
move forward at a specific length of time, to which Mr. Keating advised
that the storage tank recommendation would be Council's decision, as to
location site.
Mr. Keating noted that Tony Nolan felt he could have a more refined defi-
nition of the priority of improvements to be made in the Utility,
for both water and waste water, and the generation of funds that,.. -would pay
for those improvements. There would then be a determination, he said,
as to availability of the finances, and the order for the correction of
the improvements will be established. If those monies are not available,
then financing arrangements will be required. This, also involves the
storage tank, the raw water well fields which are now being done, and the
high service water mains that are going from the plant to University Drive.
V/M Massaro said that it appears that the Acting City Manager, Finance
Director, Consulting Engineer, and the City Engineer, have to establish
the finance situation, as to monies being available. At that time, the
Mayor would be calling a Workshop, she said, once the figures have been
determined, to establish a program.
C/M Zemel felt that the time -table was of utmost importance, as to com-
mencing construction, and how much,and where the monies will be coming
from.
Mr. Keating advised that the facilities are needed as soon as possible,
and did not want to minimize the urgency.
V/M Massaro indicated that a memorandum should be submitted to Council,
after Staff has completed their meeting.
Mr. Nolan said that he would bring in the financing and schedules for
the next Council meeting, which was discussed by Mr. Keating. He also
said the engineering has not yet been done, but they were attempting to
analyze the system, in order to perceive the best location from an economic
hydraulic standpoint. The site, he said, involved the costs, such as off -
site improvements. He felt that the City Council should make the decision
as to the site, which he reiterated as being the most economical site.
C/M Zemel said the location for the tract of land should be aesthetically
important, and beautifying the area is important.
C/M Disraelly said that the site should not be in the middle of the
property, without proper landscaping; because there is use of other land.
Ile confirmed the fact that the landscaping would also include the irriga-
tion system.
C/W Kelch said that she was ready to Locate the general location of the
site, at 77th Street and Nob Hill Road, because of the statistics that
have been presented.
C/M Zemel felt that an important decision of this kind should be brought
to the attention of the citizens of Tamarac, by giving them an opportunity
to voice their opinion.
C/M Disraelly indicated that all five members of Council should be in
attendance, and a Workshop should be called, once input has been received
by memorandum, as to priority improvements and financing.
Mr. Keating advised that the Utility is operating very well; and Frenz
Construction will be coming in the 23rd of February, for cleaning the
last two wastewater plants #1 and #4, which was approved by Council.
=I:
2/11/81
mr/
PRESENTATIONS
3. Chamber of Commerce - Presentation
declaring February 16th to February
Tamarac" week.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Proclamation read and
presented by V/M Massaro; and accepted by
George Herschenson, Director.
of Proclamation by Mayor Falck
22nd, 1981, as "Shop Smart/Shop
V/M Massaro read the Proclamation, and presented it,for the Mayor,
to George Herschenson, the Director of the Chamber of Commerce.
36. Nova University at Coral Springs - Proclamation - Winter Festival
21 to 3 21 81.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Presentation made by
V/M Massaro.
C/M Disraelly noted that Barbara McManus and Pat Gestasio made a
presentation to the Council of Northwest Mayors, by advising of the
activities at Nova University Extension in Coral Springs.
Ms. McManus indicated there would be a week-long open house at the
University, with a reception on February 27th, from 4:00 to 6:00 P.M.,
honoring Dr. Schur from the New York Institute of Technology, and
Dr. Fischler, from the Main Campus, will be in attendance. She further
added that there will be a small winter festival with fund raising
scheduled activities, from February 21 to March 21st, 1981. She said
there will be a dual piano concert on 2/21, with an authors reception
on 3/6, with Hugh Downes and the Great Santini; and on 3/21, there
will be an Art Auction at the Holiday Inn. Thereafter there will be
a fund raising drive for the new library, which will be built in Coral
Springs, she stated, for community use.
Tape V/M Massaro read the Proclamation, and presented it on behalf of the
#2 Mayor and the City Council.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
13. St. Malachy's Church Festival - Discussion and possible action on a
request to waive fee and permit requirements for a Festival.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Fees waived, but inspections
to be held prior to granting of the permit.
C/M Disraelly indicated that in the past, when St. Malachy's was pre-
paring for their Festival, the City waived the fees, but inspections
were required for specialty electrical work. He then MOVED that
St. Malachy's Festival, on the church grounds, being held on April 3rd,
4th and 5th, that the City waive the fees, but the inspections must be
held before the permit is granted. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
2. Finance Department - Personnel -- Discussion and possible action on a
request to hire one (1) part-time Clerk -Typist for work on the PSC refund.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved, or hire present Clerk
for a 40 hour week; not to exceed a 12 week period.
Mrs. Stuurmans advised that when the relating item was agendized for
the 1/14/81 meeting, it was construed to be a part-time person, temporary,
for the Utility, but a full-time, 40 hour a week person was wanted for
the PSC Utility refund program. She requested that Council approve an
additional 20-hour a week person, in order to supply the full slot re-
quired.
C/M Disraelly inquired whether this would indicate the employment of
another person, or an extension of the additional 20 hours for the same
individual; which would be a 40 hour week.
Mrs. Stuurmans said the initial individual did accept the 20 hour week,
and an inquiry would be necessary as to their acceptance of an additional
20 hour week. She also noted that it did not matter to the department
-4- 2/11/81
mr/
whether it was one or two persons that would handle the work.
C/M Disraelly and V/M Massaro both felt that if one person did the work,
on a 40 hour basis, rather than two individuals, it would be more effi-
cient.
Mrs. Stuurmans indicated that the person who worked with the PSC refund
previously, and was let go in January, is the same person that was hired
for 20 hours. She was going to attempt to have her remain at a 40 hour
week basis.
C/M Disraelly MOVED that the Finance Department be permitted to hire a
temporary part --time Clerk -Typist, of 20 hours per week, or build up the
present 20 hour Clerk -Typist, to 40 hours, for the PSC refund, not to
exceed 12 weeks.from this -date. C/W.Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
5. Consent Agenda
a) Minutes of 1/14/81 -- Regular Meeting - Approval recommended by the
City Clerk.
b) Minutes of 1/30/81 - Reconvened Regular Meeting - Approval recommended
by the City Clerk.
c) Alan F. Ruf - Consulting Attorney - 2/6/81 - $589.00 - Approval recom-
mended by the City Attorney.
d) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 12/15/80 - $108.38 -
Account #428-371-536-462 - Approval recommended by City Engineer.
e) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 12/15/80 -
$1,383.63 -- Approval recommended by City Engineer for the following
accounts:
$273.29 -
Account #425-363-533-310
$273.29 -
#425-364-533-310
$273.29 -
#425-367-535-310
$563.76 -
#425-368-535-310
f) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 12/15/80 -
$1,620.25 - Account #428-371-536-462 -- Approval recommended by City
Engineer.
g) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 1/7/81 - $571.50 -
Account #429-371-536--623 -- Approval recommended by City Engineer.
h) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 1/7/81 - $551.66 -
Account #350-500-531 - Approval recommended by City Engineer.
i) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 1/12/81 - $100.00 -
Account #1-155-513-310 - Approval recommended by City Engineer.
j) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 1/14/81 - $2,699.88--
Account #429-371-536-623 - Approval recommended by City Engineer.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) and b) Approved, as
corrected; c) thru j) Approved, as presented.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the approval of Items a) and b), as corrected,
and items c) thru j), as presented, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
6. Sid Authorization - Employee Group Insurance - Discussion and possible
action to authorize the City Manager to go out to bid for hospitalization,
medical, surgical and life insurance.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: City Manager authorized to go
to bid, with a stipulation to include the Council
members in the life insurance area, as well as
hospitalization and medical.
C/M Disraelly inquired as to the necessity of going out for bid each
year, to which the City Manager indicated that it was not done previously
because of particular coverage, bid and contract that was provided, which
did not change on the second year.
Mrs. Stuurmans said the City Attorney indicated in the fall, on this
Q•7C
2/11/81
mr/
particular plan, when discussions were held as to the necessity of going
to bid, that if the contractual obligations to Prudential did not change,
then in the calendar year, the City would not be required to go to bid.
However, she said, they were confronted with the projection, that as of
April 1, 1981, the cost will climb to 450, and it is necessary that the
City go out for bid.
C/M Zemel inquired as to the exclusion of the City Council members, on
page 5, as relates to life insurance, under Class 1. He felt that certain
benefit coverage should be included in the City Council members package.
C/M Disraelly felt there should be a designation of Council members being
included in the life insurance plan, as well as the package of hospitaliza-
tion and medical coverage. He felt clarification of the new policy should
be made, as concerns the City Council members.
He then MOVED that the City Manager go to bid for hospitalization, medical
and life insurance, with a stipulation for life insurance to be included
for Council members, as well as the present benefits which were added
as of August lst, 1980. C/M Zemel SECONDED.
V/M Massaro requested that once a determination has been made, that it
be shown to various Council members, for their approval or objection.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Mort Student felt this item should be tabled for additional inquiries,
because other cities do not include elected employees, such as City
Council members, in their medical plan.
7. Bid Award - Uniform Rental - Temp. Reso. #1839 - Discussion and possible
action to award a bid for uniform rentals for Public Works and Tamarac
Utilities.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted; to Mechanics RESOLUTION NO.R-PASSED.
Uniform, Inc., in the amount of $227.70.per week.
Marc Alan Margulies, a representative of Uniforms, Inc., and a resident
of Tamarac, said his company submitted a lower bid, but was not recom-
mended to be awarded. He was aware that Mechanics Uniform, Inc. bid
was for 90G per change, per person; with Uniforms, Inc. submitting a
lower bid in the amount of 85� per change, per person. His company did
indicate that the City of Tamarac was to be responsible for any uniforms
that are stolen, but this responsibility was accepted by Mechanics Uniform,
which he felt was unfair.
C/M Disraelly said that the bid specifications requested replacement of
missing uniforms, with no charge to the City, to which the City Manager
concurred.
Mrs. Stuurmans advised Mr. Margulies that their weekly extension figures
were higher, with a total figure of $239.70, and the bid which is being
considered, is for a total of $227.70 per week.
C/M Disraelly said the City does not recompute the figures, but did accept
a bid package for $239.70, which was opened on 1/30/81; and the award wntent
to the low bidder, Mechanics Uniform, Inc.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1839, and MOVED that the bid of Mechanics
Uniform, Inc. be approved, in the amount of $227.70, and C/W Kelch
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
8. Chief of Police -- Probationary Period - Temp. Reso. #1842 - Discussion
and possible action on lifting the one (1) year probationary period.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Probationary period RESOLUTION NO.R- gL_ PASSED.
removed for the Chief of Police.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1842.
V/M Massaro felt that the probationary period should be removed, because
--6- 2/11/81
mr/
she originally requested this one-year period. The Vice -Mayor stated that
she was very proud of the Police Chief and the response he is achieving
from the department personnel.
C/M Zemel said that as liaison Councilman with the Police Department,
he worked very closely with the Chief and his subordinates. Ile felt
that for the past six months,the improvement and performance of this
department, has been more than exemplary, with statistics being on the
positive side. He further added that the Police Department was equal
to none, for the size of this City, and would MOVE that Temp. Reso.#1842,
removing the Police Chief from a probationary status, be APPROVED.
C/M Disraelly SECONDED the motion, and stated that the Police Chief is
the most professional police officer that the City could have on their
Staff.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
9. Contract with Broward Count Sheriff - Temp. Reso. #1841 - Discussion
and possible action on authorization to enter into a contract concerning
deputizing certain City police officers.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1841.
Chief McIntosh said that a special investigation, outside of the City's
jurisdiction, does cause embarrassment to the officers and the City,
if action is not taken. But, he said, by law., they are forbidden to
take action in many cases. Also, the time factor has to be considered,
in waiting for other cities to take action.
The Sheriff, he said, would like to deputize the higher officials in the
Police Department, namely, himself, the Captain and the Lieutenants.
He gave a hypothetical case, such as a burglary in the City, with a
suspect vehicle. Because, he said, the City's limits are not smooth,
and requires going in and out of other cities and the County, and would
require going across Bailey Road, coming to a portion that is not in
Tamarac. The suspect vehicle, he said, is spotted, with the culprits
and loot within the vehicle, but they cannot take action, until someone
with deputy power is on the scene to effect the arrest.
The Police Chief advised that a Lieutenant is now on duty "around the
clock" in patrol, and can go to the scene. And,once deputized, he has
the same powers as the Sheriff, with the ability to automatically depu-
tize the men on the scene, to take action for that purpose. He con-
firmed the fact that the men could be stopped for surveillance, but
otherwise could not be arrested.
Chief McIntosh said that in an emergency, the Sheriff could take the
deputized people,for a County emergency. Ile further stated that should
an emergency occur, the Sheriff could take Policemen from the depart-
ments in the County. He also said there was a question of liability
or insurance, and, if activated by the Sheriff, then it would be under
the protection of the Sheriff. But, if action was being taken on the
part of the City, and initiated there, then they would be covered by
City insurance, which is the same coverage as fresh pursuit.
The Police Chief advised that the Sheriff prefers to deputize the
higher-ups in the Police Department, and not the lower ranking officers.
But, he said, that a specific general order will be imposed by him,
as to going all over the County, and doing work for other cities.
C/M Zemel MOVED that Temp. Reso. #1841 be ADOPTED, and C/W Kelch
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
10. Aviation Industrial Board -- Appointment of City Representative - Temp.
Reso. 41843 -- Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted; with RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
appointment of Mayor Falck.
C/W Kelch read Temp. Reso. #1843, and C/M Zemel MOVED its approval,
CiC
2/11/81
mr/
by appointing Mayor Falck, as City representative to the Aviation
Industrial Board, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
C/M Disraelly recommended that copies be sent to the City of Ft.
Lauderdale, and the Aviation industrial Board, with the insertion
of Walter W. Falck.
Tape C/M Zemel suggested that another Council member be appointed as an
#3 alternate, but to not include him, to which the Vice -Mayor stated
that it could be discussed at the next meeting.
V/M Massaro informed Council that she called Mr. Driggs of FAA, at
the Executive Airport, and discussed the "Presley" plane take -off,
and the exhaust of black oil and soot that was emitted, which covered
the entire north -south width over the City. She felt that if this
four -engine jet was allowed to come in, by law, then every other plane
of this type would be permitted.
11. Juvenile Work Program - Temp. Reso. #1840 -- Discussion and possible
action on approval to enter into a contract with the Department of
Health & Rehabilitative Services concerning placement of youth at the
Park to perform small jobs.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved, as amended, RESOLUTION 12-j�-aZ� PASSED.
in Section
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1840.
Mrs. Stuurmans indicated that her report was distributed to Council,
relating to an approach by HRS, as to the use of juveniles who are
assigned by the Court, or as volunteers, as a matter of restitution,
to do public improvement works in the City. The program, she said,
would involve Tamarac juveniles, who might be doing park related
maintenance duties that are light. These services, she stated, would
be performed for 20 hours a week, and covered by insurances through
HRS. But, Mrs. Stuurmans said the City was responsible for on -site
supervision, to be provided by both the Public Works Director, and
also a Juvenile Specialist of the Police Department.
She responded to a question by C/M Disraelly, by stating that it also
involved any maintenance of City public property. She also indicated
that these juveniles would be assigned to a Foreman, for the ultimate
responsibility, along with the Juvenile Specialist.
Edward A. Gross, the former City Manager of Tamarac, indicated that
juveniles are not recommended to work on the medians or the streets,
which is dangerous. He further added that this program is for the
youngsters of Tamarac, and they can adjudicate their problems by a
"work release", which would be of tremendous value, with assistance
to the Public Works Department.
C/M Zemel said everyone was aware that 73% of the crimes in the City
involve juveniles. He felt it was an excellent program to be insti-
tuted in Tamarac, in an area where they are congregated and supervised.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the ADOPTION of Temp. Reso. #1840, with Section
2 specifying that the Director of Public Works and the Juvenile Spe-
cialist are designated to have performed on -site supervision for all
juveniles participating. C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
15. Land Use Plan Amendment -- Temp. Ord. #852 -- Discussion and possible
action to authorize establishing fees for requests for amendment to
the City or County Land Use Plans.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 1st Reading
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Ord. #852, and indicated this request was
made because property owners ask for amendments to land use plans.
He said there is Staff input and consideration involved, and costs
for the preparation of the notices, which requires that it be heard
by the City Council. He additionally stated that the City Planner
:1:19
2/11/81
mr/
has time elements and costs, which involve him and his department.
He then MOVED that Temp. Ord. #852, establishing those fees, by resolu-
tion., be APPROVED on first reading. C/W Kelch SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
16. Senior Citizen Homestead Revenues -- Temp. Reso. #1837 - Discussion
and possible action on loss of these revenues by municipalities.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted, with copies RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
to be sent to all members of the Broward
County Legislative Delegation and the
Broward League of Cities.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1837, and said that he requested this
be written; also, recommending that other Florida cities take such
action. It would require the City increasing their Ad Valorem by
$120,000, in order to offset the Homestead Exemption, which was approved
by referendum last year. This resolution has been prepared to call its
attention to the Florida Legislature, with a request that copies be sent
to all members of the Broward County Legislative Delegation, and the
Broward League of Cities, to enable other cities to take such action.
He then MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Reso. #1837, and C/M Zemel
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
3.7. Land Development Regulations - Temp. Reso. #1836 - Discussion and
possible action on endorsement of these regulations proposed by Broward
County Technical Advisory Committee.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Held for action, later
in the day.( See pages 22 & 23)
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1836.
He said this addressed the fact that the Technical Advisory Committee
adopt the proposal, but the County refused the draft Development Review
Site Plan and Plat Ordinance, which is under consideration. This was
prepared by Harry Stewart, the Counsel for the Commission, but he re-
quested that the ordinance prepared by the TAC be adopted, which was
fairer.
C/M Disraelly requested to hold this item for consideration later in
the day,with input by the Mayor.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
24. Fairways of Tam,arac BB - Tem . Reso. #1813 - Discussion
._r,. _ -- .�-ldgs. A &
and possible action trelease a cash warranty bond for drainage.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Held for consideration
later in the day. (See page 20)
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1813.
V/M Massaro indicated that a particular time was allotted for this
item, and it will be heard later in the day.
30. Tamarac Park - Grant Authorization - Tema.-Reso. #1846 - Discussion
and possible action on approval to seek grant funds for improvements
and expansion.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted; to be taken RESOLUTION NO.R- rZ-�,30Z PASSED.
from the Parks and Recreation Fund.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1846 in its entirety.
He said that under the guide lines established by the Florida Recrea-
tion Development Program, a grant application was submitted, which was
for improvements and expansion of Tamarac Park. It includes, he said,
2/11/81
mr/
� � r
lights for the ball field and parking lot, new Recreation Department
office and equipment shed, handball court and lights, tennis court and
lights, bocci courts, horseshoe pits, and additional paving for the
parking. The total estimated cost, he said, was $127,996.00, of which
the State will pay one-third, $42,656.00, with the City's obligation
being $85,330.00. C/M Disraelly also indicated that at this time, it
is not totally budgeted by the City.
V/M Massaro noted that a budget adjustment will come out of the Parks
and Recreation Fund, and not the General Fund.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Reso. #1846, and C/W Kelch
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
35. Travel Reimbursement Rates - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: City Manager to research
the legally allowable travel reimbursement,
and if feasible, to be increased to the allowable
rate, not to exceed 25G per mile. (See page 1)
C111 Zemel discussed the increase in the cost of fuel, and maintaining
a vehicle. He MOVED that the City Manager research the legally allowable
travel reimbursement for use of private vehicles, during City business,
and to increase it, if legally feasible, to the allowable rate, which
is not to exceed 25�, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
37. Consideration from the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development for Local Plannin Assistance Funds for Fiscal Year Begin-
ning July 1, 1981 - Tem . Reso. #1848.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted
( See page 2 )
RESOLUTION NO.R-- �PASSED.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1848, in its entirety.
He advised that the "701" Program has been in existence for a number
of years, and is the primary Federal source of Local Planning Assistance.
The monies, he said, could be used for implementation of land use of
housing plans, which would include, in the City of Tamarac, the rezonings
of land, not in compliance with the Land Use Plan. Also, it would include
the preparation of development regulations, as required by the Broward
County Land Use Plan, and other items in the planning area. He addi-
tionally noted that the City has previously applied for these funds,
but was always ranked very "low".
This particular funding of the "701" Planning Grant, he stated, is
two-thirds by the State, and one-third by the City. He then MOVED for
adoption of Temp. Reso. #1848. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
C/M Zemel noted that Council did not receive documentation for this
item.
V/M Massaro requested that a copy of the law be submitted, which is
associated with this process.
VOTE: C/W
Kelch
- Aye
C/M
Zemel
- Nay
C/M
Disraelly --
Aye
V/M
Massaro
- Aye
38. Letter of Interest for Financial Assistance for a Bicvcle Route Svstem
Temp. Reso. #1849.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted, as amended, RESOLUTION NO.R-- g% PASSED.
relating to Letters of Interest.(See page 2)
The City Manager indicated that the application was in the process of
being typed for the members of Council. She further added that Mr.Cross
_10- 2/11/81
mr/
noted this has just come to him in the mail, and involves a pressing
deadline. She felt it was difficult to discuss this, without the
benefit of graphic layout, but Mr. Cross is proposing the construction
of bike paths, where there are existing sidewalks, in order for the
funded effort to be for connecting lines. She requested to hold this
item for later,.in the day, and at the time that Mr. Cross would be in
attendance.
C/W Kelch said that the Letter of Interest should be defined.
C/M Disraelly inquired of the City Manager, whether the bike path
would continue theoretically on University Drive from Plantation
through Sunrise, and up to Southgate Boulevard, by having bike exten-
sion riding areas into Tamarac.
Mrs. Stuurmans concurred that theoretically they anticipated a continua-
tion of such bike paths, and also noted that areas on Southgate Boulevard
were discussed. She responded to a question by C/M Disraelly, by
stating that 57th Street and the northern swale area was under considera-
tion, plus areas on McNab Road.
C/W Kelch felt a bike path was needed south and north on Commercial
Boulevard, at the State Road 7 intersection, in order to assist people
who are no longer able to drive an automobile, but would permit them
to reach various shops.
Tape
#4 The City Manager indicated that consideration would be given to the
request made by C/W Kelch.
MEETING WAS RECESSED FOR LUNCH, TO 1:30 P.M.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER, ROLL CALL TAKEN, WITH MAYOR FALCK ABSENT & EXCUSED.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
12. Fluoridation of Public Water Supply - Discussion and possible action
on a letter from HRS Broward County Health Department pertaining to
fluoridation.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to 2/25/81,
for additional input.
Thomas K. Mueller, a Sanitary and Professional Engineer, with the
Environmental Engineering Section of the Broward County Health Depart-
ment, said that he will be presenting information relating to the
fluoridation program in Broward County. Fie quoted from a prepared text,
by stating that;"9he approval for the installation of fluoridation
facilities to serve a community water system, is obtained from the
Florida Department of Environmental Regulations. Engineering project
documents prepared by a Florida Registered Engineer, for the Utility
or municipality proposing to fluoridate its water supply, must be
submitted to the Department of Environmental Regulations, for proces-
sing and permitting, before any equipment is ordered, or installation
undertaken. Upon completion of the installation, and certification
of the project work by the Engineer of Record, fluoride dosage may
commence, under the supervision of a State of Florida Certified Operator,
having a minimum of required "C" Water License. Monitoring of the
fluoride level in the treated water must be performed by the water
plant operating personnel, during each eight -hour shift interval.
Split fluoride samples from the plant and distribution system, are to
be collected on a minimal basis of once per month, for analysis by
the water plant laboratory and the Florida Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services, Miami Branch Laboratory."
Mr. Mueller said the history of fluoridation in Broward County began
on March 7, 1972, when Broward County voters affirmatively voted 2 to
1, to a straw ballot question, that appeared on the National Primary
Ballot, with a response of "yes" or "no". Additionally, he stated,
that eight cities in the County, namely, Cooper City, Coral Springs,
Deerfield Beach, Hillsboro Beach, Pembroke Pines, Pompano Beach,
Sunrise and Tamarac, are exempted from the ordinance, due to each
-11- 2/11/81
mr/
L. 'A
L _1
having adopted a local ordinance, which prohibits fluoridation of
the community water supply.
Mr. Mueller said that at the present time water fluoridation is
practiced at 23 of Broward's water plants; with approximately 54% of
Broward County's population being served by public water supply systems,
receiving fluoridated water. The implementation of fluoridation
by the City of Ft. Lauderdale will take place in December of 1981, at
which time, no less than 750 of the County's population will be served
with water from fluoridated supplies.
(MAYOR FALCK AND THE CITY ATTORNEY WERE IN ATTENDANCE AT THIS TIME -1:45 P.M.)
Since the initial implementation of fluoridation in Broward County,
10/29/74, there have been no documented problems,he said, relating
to consumer acceptance, the practice of feeding fluoride chemicals,
and adverse health effects due to persons drinking fluoridated water.
He noted there was a Federal Grant program available, which the City
of Tamarac could take advantage of, as to installation and purchase
of the equipment, monitoring equipment, and also the cost of the
chemical for the first two years. The program, he said, was being
administered on the national level, by the Center of Disease Control
out of Atlanta, and is a national program.
Mr. Mueller advised that the State of Florida Health Program office
in Tallahassee was represented by Mrs. Linda Greis, and was admini-
strating the program in the State of Florida. He indicated that a
letter was sent to all City Officials in Tamarac, through the Oeunty
Health Department, and the other seven communities that he previously
named, for purposes of enacting and implementing fluoridation at this
time.
He indicated that the estimated cost of the chemical figured on a
per capita basis per year, is 5 to 10 cents, with the higher end for
smaller systems, where the chemical is delivered in 55 gallon containers,
with limited use of quantities. The City of Ft. Lauderdale, he said,
will have it delivered in bulk trucks, and possibly railroad cars,
which will reduce the cost to possibly 5� estimated per capita cost
per year. The chemical cost would amount to approximately $3,000.00
per year, with a community of 30,000 people. Fie reiterated that under
this program the first two years of chemical cost would be covered,
and the City absorbing on -going costs thereafter.
Mr. Mueller responded to a question by the Vice -Mayor, by stating
that the implementation involves the installation of chemical feed
equipment, which is a positive displacement pump. He felt that two
pumps would be recommended, as a maintenance precaution, for the other
one to feed the chemical, if there was a problem. Mr. Mueller also
stated that various tests were performed routinely during each shift
in the operation of a water plant, and such monitoring would not require
any additional manpower. He also indicated that slides could be shown
which would give everyone a better idea of what is involved with fluori-
dation.
V/M Massaro felt that the slides could not be shown this day, because
the meeting could not be continued on the following day, due to lack
of a quorum, with some of the Council members being away. She further
suggested that the City Engineer present a memorandum, informing the
Council of everything the City can anticipate with the installation of
fluoridation.
C/M Disraelly said that he requested to place this item on the agenda,
because he was not aware that Tamarac was not _ fluoridating their
water. He also noted his surprise at the passage of an ordinance in
November of 1972, declaring that the City of Tamarac be excluded from
fluoridation. Upon calling some dentists, he determined that fluorida-
tion does prevent caries, and is not detrimental to seniors, but de-
creases the possibility of osteoporosis, and the prevention of caries
in unborn children. He was advised by the City Engineer that once the
system is put into effect, and the costs are paid by these grants,
that other than the normal handling of water supplies and other examina-
tions as required in the laboratory, the potential cost would be below
$5,000 maximum per year. C/M Disraelly said through his research, he
felt the figure would be between $3,000 to $5,000 a year.
-12- 2/11/81
mr/
C/M Zemel felt that costs should be considered on an everyday basis
for the citizens.
V/M Massaro said that in 1972 public hearings were held, and the
people did not want the fluoridation, but was presently interested in
the costs which were involved.
Mr. Mueller said the grant was by the Federal Government administered
by the Center of Disease Control, on a State level, by the Department
Health and Rehabilitive Services. He further stated there would be
no cost to the City for the first two years, and thereafter, the City
would absorb the cost of the chemical. Mr. Mueller said the first
implementation was in 1974, with the biggest problem being in the
monitoring of the equipment. He added that a color metric technique
was used, and did not always give reliable results, and did rely on
the Miami laboratory. But, they were now asking that all water systems
use a probe technique, with specific iron electrodes, which is not
subject to any interference, and would be included as part of the grant
program. The iron electrode probe would be replaced every 1 1/2 to
2 years, and would be in addition to the ongoing cost of the chemical.
He felt that a dual dosing system should be provided, in order to have
back-up, if there is a maintenance problem, and to have continuous
fluoridation at all times. This, he felt, would be fail-safe.
Mayor Falck felt that the information should be made available to
the Council members, prior to action, and then have it agendized for
the next meeting of 2/25/81.
Mr. Birken advised that the ordinance is not in the code book,. and
was not codified, but the language of the ordinance states that the
County Commission requested to not fluoride the water. He felt that
under the language of the ordinance, the City has total flexibility
for whatever action they want to take.
Linda Greis, a Registered Nurse and Program Coordinator for the Florida
Fluoridation project, and is the person who has the money available
for the grant. She said there are monies available for Broward County
at this time, because of the funds which are already in the Federal
budget, and from the old administration. She further stated, that
unless there is a time delay, then the monies would be available.
Mrs. Greis said the cost figure to Tamarac after two years, is the
cost of three candy bars.
Mrs. Greis indicated that Mr. Mueller has already evaluated the water
system in Tamarac, with a recommendation to the liquid system, which
is the cheapest and best method, and could be tied into the Fort
Lauderdale system. She further stated that all the money will be
supplied for this system.
Mr. Mueller responded to a question by C/M Disraelly, by stating that
the form of an add -on building to the plant, where space could be
carved, in order to house the equipment in a separate facility, such
as chlorination, would also be included in the available monies.
Mr. Mueller said that a fiberglass structure is prefabricated and
equipment is inttalled within.
Mrs. Greis advised that they have contacted the Department of Environ-
mental Regulations,about the possibility of not requiring the separate
structure. She said the new law has been written for the liquid system,
and if adequately vented, then a new structure is not required. She
felt there was no reason that the citizens of Tamarac should not benefit
from this cost effective economical program; also noting that there is
no longer a formal ordinance or resolution required to have this im-
plemented in the City. Authorization alone is required by the governing
body of the water system.
C/M Zemel said that the American Dental Association claims that the
cost per person will be 18 to 20 cents per year for fluoridation.
Mrs. Greis said the entire installation cost will be paid, and it would
be more accurate to state the cost as being 51, per year.
Mayor Falck said that Council was requesting the opportunity to review
-13- 2/11/81
mr/
L
this prior to the 2/25/81 meeting.
C/M Zemel indicated that because the City of Ft. Lauderdale will be
fluoridated, then a portion of the City of Tamarac will automatically
be included, because their water is supplied by Ft. Lauderdale.
C/W Kelch said that a dentist spoke with her, namely, Dr.Donald Barber
from Buffalo, New York, who was not in favor of fluoridation, and
felt it had harmful effects. He indicated that documentation would be
sent by him, relating to this, in order to support his views against
inclusion of these materials in the water system. She requested that
the item be held until this input is received.
V/M Massaro MOVED to table this item to the 2/25/81 meeting, and
C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
18. Mainlands Center - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan
b) Landscape Plan
c) Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
(located at N.E. corner of University Drive & N.W. 58th Street)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:a) Site Plan approved, with
conditions, and then rescinded, because drainage
improvement and water retention fees were not paid.
a), b), and c) Tabled to 2/25/81, but if fees are
not paid, the item will not appear on the agenda.
a) Lawrence Kramer, the Architect for the proposed project, advised
that the Site Plan was approved by the Planning Commission, which
recommendations were incorporated.
C/M Disraelly inquired as to the computation of parking spaces,
and indicated that it should be 53 spaces, plus the handicapped,
which should be corrected under site statistics. He also noted
that the Beautification Committee discussed the fact that the wall
at the east end extends to within a couple of feet of the sidewalk.
It was their recommendation, he said, that it be stepped down for
better visibility; with the wall to be reduced to a three (3) foot
height, approximately 25 feet back. He further stated that the wall
should conform with the ordinance.
Ile inquired as to sufficient lighting, to which Mr. Kramer indicated
the areas where the light poles are located.
C/M Disraelly discussed the shaded area, and whether it will be
maintained by the property owner, to which Mr. Kramer concurred.
Fie requested that a stipulation be submitted relating to this.
C/M Disraelly confirmed the lighting at the entrance, on 58th Street;
with the lighting coming off the east side of the building. He
inquired as to the need for a ground sign, to which Mr. Kramer noted
that they were not contemplating one at this time. C/M Disraelly
added that should this be needed in the future, it would require a
revised site plan.
V/M Massaro said that at least 25 feet has been obtained, and would
prefer as much wall as possible, but did agree that some protection
is required.
Tape
;5 Mr. Kramer said it would be 49 feet distance from the wall to the
face of the building, and 55 feet from the property line.
V/M Massaro indicated that if the wall is cut to the building line,
from six (6) to three (3) feet, it would look better, and give
adequate vision to 75th Avenue, and the plantings could be aesthet-
ically arranged, using a different size plant.
-14- 2/11/81
mr/
The City Attorney also noted that the when the property is fully
platted, the dedication requirements as set forth in the plat ordi-
nance,are not set forth in any other regulations by the City. He
said there is a difference between platting and site planning, and
when platted, it is necessary to dedicate under the County Platting
Regulations. He also stated that the City does not have that require-
ment at the present time, that would require dedications of right--of-
way during the site plan process; with a possible parking problem later.
C/M Disraelly inquired as to the State widening the road at a future
date,also,the 20 parking spaces being removed, and whether the building
would then be in violation; to which Mr. Birken said this would be
addressed at some future time.
Mr. Kramer advised that this project does not involve a set of stores,
but is a professional office building, and small delivery situations
were anticipated.
V/M Massaro inquired about the guardrail being on the curb line, rather
than the bulkhead, to which Mr. Kramer concurred, and noted this on
the plan. He further responded that they will align the sidewalks,
with the adjacent ones, and will also bridge across, and tie both
sidewalks.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the acceptance of the site plan, with a stipu-
lation or agreement that the Mainlands Center will maintain all of
the swale, and the area east of the wall, all of the shaded area, and
the swale area east of the wall on 75th Avenue, as well as the shaded
areas indicated on 58th Street; and, the wall on the east side be re-
duced from six (6) feet to three (3) feet, at a point parallel to the
south face of the building. Also, it indicates that 53 parking spaces
are required.
The guardrail, he said, is to be put inboard of the bulkhead, on the
existing canal. The Development Review Requirement has been met.
He additionally stated that the guardrail is to conform to the City
Engineer's requirements. V/M Massaro SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
V/M Massaro inquired about the water retention and drainage improve-
ment fees being paid, to which Mr. Kramer responded that he was not
aware of this, but would advise the owner, Mr. Cassas, and present
the bills to him.
V/M Massaro said that under the circumstances, no action could be
taken at this time.
C/M Disraelly MOVED to RESCIND the action that was taken, and C/M Zemel
SECONDED.
VOTE: .ALL VOTED AYE.
C/M Disraelly MOVED to TABLE Item #18 to the next regular meeting of
2/25/81, with a condition that if the fees are not paid, then it will
not appear on the agenda. C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
19. Polish American Club - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan
b) Plat - Temp. Reso. #1844
c) Landscape Plan
(located just east of Inter -City Auto on the south side of Commercial
Boulevard)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTI014: a), b), and c) Tabled
to 2/25 81, provided that fees are paid.
Mayor Falck indicated that the site plan was delivered at 3:45 P.M.,
on February 10, 1981.
-15- 2/11/81
mr/
L.
14
C/M Disraelly MOVED to TABLE Item #19 to the next regular meeting,
provided that the fees have been paid, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
20. Tamarac Shopping Plaza - (N.W. 66th Terrace & Commercial Blvd.) Dis-
cussion and possible action on a revised site plan for a dumpster.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved, with recommendations.
Sidney Shapiro, one of the owners, was in attendance.
V/M Massaro felt this project simply required an additional dumpster,
with the most likely area being selected, which does not interfere
with anything. She MOVED for approval of the revised site plan, and
C/W Kelch SECONDED.
C/M Disraelly indicated that he reviewed this, and did not object to
the placement of the dumpster, but the original site plan had a hedge
located on the west side of this property, and no longer exists. Also,
according to the site plan, there are two trees missing; and the old
dumpster on 57th Street has had the wall raised, but is not painted,and
is unsightly. He also noted that there were four dumpsters in the
enclosure, with one being on the outside; the west side of the building
is unsightly, and a large door is leaning against the wall on the side
where Riverside Chapel is building. He also added that there are trash
and fruit boxes in the area; with the radii into the parking fxom 66th
Street being totally broken. He felt that this area should be cleaned
prior to granting of the revised site plan; with the loading zone to'.be
restriped and remarked. Additionally, he stated that everything should
be completed, prior to the permit for a dumpster.
V/M Massaro felt it was very important to get this dumpster, because
it was a health hazard, and would alleviate some problems. The other
items, she said, involved code enforcement.
C/M Disraelly said the west side should be cleared up, because the
grass is piled high, and if not done at this time, it might never be
accomplished. He noted that other projects have been previously dis-
cussed, with the feeling that if items are not required, before the
issuance of the permit, it will not be done.
Paul Abel, another owner of the shopping center, indicated that all
the trash has been cleaned, with an extra two -feet of concrete slab that
has been moved,which is overhanging on the adjacent property. Also,
the electrical lines were moved on to the property, which were en-
croaching, he said, and everything was according to Code on the west
side of the building, outside of the leaning door.
Tape
#6 Mr. Abel indicated that there are gas tanks being used at the restaur"
ant, but the Code does require outside storage, with steel posts. He
stated that Deli Warehouse has been advised about trash on the north
side of the building. Mr. Abel said that the new dumpster would be
for two new bins to handle at least one restaurant and the Deli Ware-
house.
C/M Disraelly confirmed the fact that the City Planner will indicate
that there will be a grease trap, to which Mr. Abel concurred; also
stating that he will paint the dumpster on Commercial Boulevard, and
that the four dumpsters will be maintained, omitting bins being placed
outside of the trash area.
Mr. Abel agreed that he would replace the hedges between the Deli
Warehouse and the placement of the new dumpster; striping and remarking
the loading zone, plus installation of new concrete to repair the four
pot holes into the parking area, from 66th Street. He anticipated
this would be completed within 30 days.
In response to a question by the Vice -Mayor, the City Attorney stated
that the owners would be in violation of the ordinance, if they do
not adhere to the Code.
-16- 2/11/81
mr
C/M Disraelly reviewed the items recommended by Council, which were
agreed to by the owners:
1. Paint dumpster wall on 57th Street.
2. Maintenance of dumpsters in enclosure.
3. Hedge to be replaced, between Deli Warehouse and new dumpster.
4. Remark and restripe the loading zone.
5. Four pot holes into parking, from 66th Street, to be corlpleted
within 30 days, with installation of new concrete.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
In response to a question by C/M Disraelly, the owner, Mr. Abel
stated that he did not anticipate that the building would be
turned.
23. Brookwood
substitute
and McNab
Gardens - Discussion and
a cash bond posted for
Road, with a performance
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: $20,000 cash bond to be
returned, when the proper bond is approved
by the City Attorney.
possible action on a request to
signalization at Brookwood Boulevard
bond.
Greg Darby represented the developer, and requested clarification,
because his client was having a problem obtaining the $20,000 bond
for the traffic light, because it was being incorporated with his
subdivision bond. Ile further stated that it would be a separate bond,
because it was going through the same bonding company. Mr. Darby added
that a $20,000 cash bond was submitted to the City, on a temporary
basis, with a cover letter, which indicates that they would like to
substitute it with a performance bond, for the time period of three
years from plat approval, on December 10th. It was agendized, he
said, for the purpose of having the cash bond returned, at the time
the performance bond is submitted.
C/M Disraelly recalled that his previous motion did indicate a band,
which would run to the County, and not the City. But, he said, a
letter was written to Mr. John Gerren, of the Department of Transporta-
tion, advising of a bond of $20,000 for three years. He did not feel
that it should be a cash bond, especially if it was substituted.
He then MOVED that the $20,000.00 be returned, when the proper bond
is approved for that amount, by the City Attorney, and V/M Massaro
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
21. Granek Properties - Petition #1-Z-81 - Discussion and possible action
to grant a limited waiver to parking requirements for a proposed office
plaza on the west side of State Road 7, north of Commercial Plaza, by
Temp. Reso. #1826.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to 2/25/81
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1826.
Julian Bryan, the representative for Granek Properties, said this
was originally known as the Lakeside Apartments, which was submitted
as a preliminary plan, and subsequently purchased by Mr. Granados, who
submitted a site plan for 200 plus apartments, on the rear 14 acres of
that site. He noted the area of the Florida Turnpike and Treehouse
Apartments, and the frontage on State Road 7, with a public road that
enters the parcel from the south side of the B-1 zoned property.
Mr. Bryan said there is approximately 4 1/2 acres of property, with
garden apartments behind it, which is for professional offices, rather
than retail sales or businesses, and no doctors.
C/M Disraelly said that 52,000 square feet of floor area was being
considered, with required parking of 1 to 200, of 260 parking spaces
which he felt did include the handicapped spaces; namely, four, thus
-17-
2/11/81
mr/
J
allowing 256 parking spaces. He further stated that should a profes-
sional medical man move into the building, then the entire parking
requirements would change. Also, he said, upon entry from State Road
7, there were four or five spaces which are directly into the entrance,
and would involve crash possibilities. He added, that on Lakeside
Drive, there were four parking spaces, at the west entry, and upon
backing out of the spaces, the visibility was extremely poor. The
dedicated additional right-of-way on 441 will also move the parking
spaces on the east, to the new right -of --way, and inquired about side-
walks. The six parking spaces, he indicated, would be in the area
of the right -of --way, and 90' degree parking on both sides, was a hor-
rendous plan for State Road 7.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for DENIAL, and DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Mr. Bryan indicated the various reasons for the 901 degree parking
being desirable, because they have the opportunity to create a building
that has more aesthetic value and interest, with the structure being
placed in the center of the parcel, with parking surrounding it.
He felt it was substantially more desirable to encircle a professional
office building, with parking and minimizing foot travel for entry
into the building, and the need to have access around either end of
the building, also, north and south to the rear and front. Mr. Bryan
said that 50% of the parking spaces are eliminated, if angle parking
is used on the front and rear of the building. He did not agree with
C/M Disraelly, as to the incorrectess or impropriety of the parking,
and said that he did not have a problem with the elimination of these
parking spaces, or, if necessary, the elimination of square footage
of the building.
Mr. Bryan said that it is not contrary to Code or good planning, and
everything he is presenting, does meet the Code, the size of the
islands, the size of the back -out and amount of spaces. They were,
he said, attempting to create a more interesting building, in order to
add more aesthetic value to the property. He indicated that the
Chairman and the Planning Commissioners were unanimously in favor of
90' degree parking, and felt it was the finest site plan for such use.
Mr. Bryan felt that denial of this waiver was not in the best interest
of the City, and by reduction of particular spaces, they would
also reduce the square footage of the building. Once the proper site
plan is submitted, he said, the parking would be in compliance with
the Code. All angle parking, he said, would change the shape of the
building, and could be 52,000 square feet, by eliminating particular
open space, and extending the parking.
C/M Zemel was aware of the dangerous area involving ingress and
egress on State Road 7, and would request the elimination or deletion
of five spaces, to which Mr. Bryan concurred.
C/W Kelch felt that a hardship does exist, because of the reduction
of the property, with the widening of Route #441; also, that the
waiver, as indicated in the resolution, does not indicate that anything
detrimental would be done to the public health, safety and welfare
of the citizens. She MOVED for the approval of Temp. Reso. #1826,
which involved a waiver and not a site plan.
Mr. Birken recommended inclusion in the motion, that 90' degree
parking would be permitted, if there were 25 feet between 900 degree
parking spaces, to which C/W Kelch concurred.
V/M Massaro felt it could be made more acceptable to Council, if
there is an indication that the applicant has agreed, that in the
presentation of the formal site plan, there will be no parking in
front of the entrance on 441, by eliminating five spaces. Also, that
the site plan is not being approved, but approving the waiver, pro-
viding the spaces will be eliminated in the final site plan.
The City Attorney stated that the waiver only involves 90' degree
parking, but does not relate to loading requirements, parking, setbacks,
or landscaping. This approval will not require reduction of parking
spaces, he said.
-18- 2/11/81
mr/
V/M Massaro said the motion included the elimination of at least five
parking spaces; also, agreeing that there can be no parking in front
of the entrance. She also said that it would be the applicant's
responsibility to size the building to the City's requirements. The
Vice -Mayor felt another condition should be included, as to not
waiving any requirements, as to the number of parking spaces, but
would completely be the applicant's responsibility.
Mr. Bryan said he would like to resubmit this site plan, with a
slightly smaller building, and the elimination of the parking spaces
which were discussed. They would be prepared to submit a site plan,
he said, within the next 10 days, and would not conceptually change
the plan.
V/M Massaro confirmed the fact that they would reduce the building,
in order to provide the number of spaces that are required. She then
SECONDED THE MOTION.
C/M Zemel MOVED to TABLE the item at this time, due to confusion and
questions on the item, to the next regular meeting, and C/P1 Disraelly
SECONDED.
VOTE: C/M Zemel - Aye
C/W Kelch - Nay
C/M Disraelly - Aye
V/M Massaro - Nay
Mayor Falck - Aye
22. Woodmont Country Club - Sign Waiver -- Temp. Reso. #1845 -- Discussion
and possible action to approve a waiver of the sign ordinance for a
sign on University Drive, between 78th Street entrance and the 17th
tee.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Upon the recommendation of
the City Attorney, this item was remanded back
to the Beautification Committee, for action, and
a decision to be made by Council thereafter.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1845.
The City Manager reported on a request made by the City Attorney,
by stating that the Beautification Committee has not heard this item
as a waiver.
Mr. Birken said there is a requirement that the Beautification Com-
mittee act on a request for a sign waiver, which was not heard by
them. They denied the application, but the waiver was not acted
upon, and was required to appear before them, prior to the City
Council. He then recommended that it be remanded back to the Beauti-
fication Committee, until there is a decision made, and the item be
tabled.
Phil Pisano, of Sign Design, represented Woodmont Country Club, and
advised that he came before the Beautification Committee, wherein
a request was made to revise their plan, with modifications.
C/M Disraelly said that the minutes of 12/15/80 indicated that the
Beautification Committee denied this sign, because they felt it was
a billboard type sign. Subsequently, he said, there was a meeting
with the Chairman, Ray Baade, Steve Epple, Phil Pisano, and he, with
a decision to reduce the size of the sign, for conformance with the
City's standards. The 16 foot width, he said, would be reduced to
12 feet, and the golf or tennis ball would be removed, being four
feet in height, and the letters at the bottom of the "S", would
conform to the balance of the letters of the sign; also, placing it
on the berm.
He felt that it was presently before Council, because the denial
related to the type of sign, and based on the location which might
be construed as not being on their own property. It was, he said,
being placed on the golf course property, adjacent between the 16th
green and the 17th tee, being set back some distance from University
Drive. He additionally indicated that Council stated that they want
to approve signs not placed on one's own property, and was the reason
-19-, 2/11/81
mr/
it was put on the agenda at this time.
Mr. Birken reiterated that it was not in accordance with the sign
ordinance, and Council could not take action, until the Beautifica-
tion Committee hears the petition for the waiver, with a recommenda-
tion to be submitted to the City Council. He said the minutes do
not reflect such action, and this procedure was required.
Tape
#7 C/M Disraelly requested that the City Manager put this on the
agenda for the Beautification Committee, at their next meeting, 2/23/81.
He then MOVED to remand it back to the Beautification Committee, for
their action and decision for a waiver to come to Council, and
C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Mr. Bryan indicated, as relates to Item 21, Granek Properties, that
he will be on vacation for the February 25, 1981 meeting of Council,
and would have the necessary information and documentation prepared.
He also inquired of the City Attorney, as to the petition being
withdrawn by the applicant, prior to action, to which Mr. Birken con-
curred.
V/M Massaro inquired whether a tabling motion takes precedence over a
motion that is on the floor, to which Mayor Falck acknowledged that it
did.
24. Fairways of Tamarac -- B1dgs._ A & B - Temp. Reso. #1813 - Discussion
and possible action to release a cash warranty bond for drainage.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled, due to a serious
problem, and until illegal parking and the
drainage involved has been cleared.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1813.
Charles Pettit, Attorney, for Gerald Wessenger, has an assignment
which was executed by Mr. Taylor, for J.G. Taylor & Sons, which was
distributed to Council. He further stated that Mr. Barbuto of the
Engineering Department stated that drainage work was done, and was
proper for the release of the cash bond.
V/M Massaro was not familiar with the assignment, which was a separate
issue, but felt this item should be tabled, because of a serious
problem with the parking areas, which is part of every bond. Addi-
tionally, she said, the plans that were submitted, and the work which
was done, does not coincide. She said that some parking places have
to be removed, and the bond will need to be reviewed, which involves
drainage, and is an engineering bond. The Vice -Mayor said that half
of the parking area has been moved, and brought into a position that
narrows the driving lane, to such an extent that could create a very
serious problem.
Mr. Pettit said that it was his understanding that the bond relates
to the drainage system, with a recommended release of the bond by
the Engineering Department.
Mr. Birken said that the Vice -Mayor is not satisfied with the drainage
work, and until completed, she has the right to request that the item
be tabled.
C/W Kelch MOVED to TABLE this item, until a determination of the
illegal parking, and the drainage involved, has been cleared, and
V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
26. Shops of Tamarac - Bond Release - Temp._ Reso. #1795 - Discussion and
possible action to release a cash bond posted for installation of
median improvements on N.W. 70th Street, subject to receipt of a
warranty bond.
-20-
2/11/81
mr/
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted, with
conditions.
RESOLUTION NO.R-- ~"�C] PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1795.
Barry Eden, represented Shops of Tamarac, and indicated that the
original work for this bond, was for the installation of two entrances,
and one new median cut on 70th Street. He said there was discussion
at that time, that the owners had agreed to curb the south side of
the 70th Street median.
C/M Disraelly advised that the original motion was for it to be done
by Mr. Eden, but there was a request to delay it.
Mr. Eden said such a request was made to delay it, until the other
side was completed. He added that Toll Development has an option
on the property across the street, but are not the owners, and there
was a question as to completion of the curbing on that side. He did
state that the bullnoses were curbed, but he has personally entered
into an agreement with the City, guaranteeing to do that strip, when
the other side is done.
He advised that under the site plan submitted by Toll Development,
there would be a turn -lane, and the curbing would have to be taken
out. The back-up work includes a letter, which was signed by
Mr. Ritter, Mr. Shurr and himself. Mr. Eden further stated that a
major problem has been resolved, and the automobiles are not cutting
across the median.
C/M Disraelly inquired of Mr. Eden, as to giving the City a warranty
bond in the amount of $625.25, to which he concurred. C/M Disraelly
then MOVED to adopt Temp. Reso. #1795, authorizing the release of
the cash bond, subject to receipt of a cash bond in the amount of
$625.25. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
Mr. Birken requested that the letter which was submitted be in
recordable and notarized form, as to the petitioner doing the work
on the south side, to which Mr. Eden concurred.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
28. Sands Point - Building K - Bond Release - Temp. Reso. #1325 - Discus-
sion and possible action to release a cash landscape bond posted to
guarantee corrections needed at this location.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted, releasing bond RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
in the amount of $3,430.00.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1325.
C/M Disraelly indicated that this item has been in existence for a
long period of time, and at the request of Council, the City Planner
inspected and found no deficiencies for Building K, other than
mulching. The report by Mr. Cross also indicated that the number of
trees surrounding the building, were in excess of the Beautification
Plan presented in 1973.
Mr. Cross said the Arec.a or Bamboo Palms are not shown on the land-
scape plan, and could be considered in excess.
Also, C/M Disraelly stated that the item was previously held up due
to ponding adjacent to Building K, and at this time has found no
problem with the report from Mr. Evan Cross. He MOVED that Temp.
Reso. #1325, releasing the bond, in the amount of $3,430.00, be
approved, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
Melanie Reynolds, a resident of Sands Point, indicated that she does
not live in Building K, but the Bamboo Palms that are considered to
be in excess, will cause her additional expense, and will have to
eventually be removed. She felt that Beautification Ordinances did
require compliance with all specifications, but the developer,
Mr. Levine, did not include Bamboo Palms in his landscape plan.
-21-
2/11/81
mr/
r
Lawrence Levine, the principal of Country Lakes Associated Ltd., said
that he brought a general release, which was signed by the Condominium
Association for Building K, at Sands Point; and distributed copies
to Council.
VOTE: C/M Zemel - Aye
C/W Kelch - Nay
C/M Disraelly - Aye
V/M Massaro - Nay
Mayor Falck - Aye
LEGAL AFFAIRS
17. Land Development Regulations - Temp. Reso. #1836 - Discussion and
possible action on endorsement of these regulations proposed by
Broward County Technical Advisory Committee.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted, with RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
recommendations. See page 9)
C/M Disraelly noted that the resolution was read earlier in the day
and held for input by Mayor Falck.
Mr. Birken, who also attended the meeting with Mayor Falck, said that
the County Commission discussed a 77 page ordinance, which relates to
a new proposed plat, and "an everything else ordinance" by Harry
Stewart. He said that a question was asked by the members of the
County Commission, to Mr. Stewart, as to denying a plat, because
someone did not sign up under the "201" program, to which his response
was that he would like to present a written memorandum on this.
He said it was a horrendous ordinance, and will copy it to Council,
but felt the problem exists on page 68, which notes that the County
Commission shall have independent review of certain things that the
City does. This, he said, includes drainage, bondings and air quality
findings, and road dedications, which he felt was most significant to
this City.
Mr.Birken said if the County Commission wants to have a referendum,
on taking away the ability of the cities to have input into the future
development of their City, then it should be taken to the voters of
Broward County, for a referendum. He said the City has been waiting
for the County to develop the standards, in order to assist them in
putting it in final form.
The Technical Advisory Committee ordinance, he said, was prepared by
representatives of City Planning Staff, and under the supervision of
the County Planner; who is the second highest paid County Official to
--Graham Watt. He said the County Planner, his staff and TAC, recom-
mended its adoption. Aft•Pr holding a Workshop, the County -
indicated changes to the County Attorney, as to garbage sites, drainage,
and membership of the "201" program. It was further noted by the City
Attorney, that the "201" program has not yet been approved by the
Federal Government; but regardless of that, anyone having a plat
review... -would- have to be- ia- CQp,-fo-x' Pce Wit. }p- 112 0 1„
The City Attorney strongly recommended the adoption of this resolution,
did anticipate that Council would permit him to be involved and monitor
everything that is happening. He said many cities were involved with
land regulations, and felt that a letter should be sent, requesting
the County Commission hold a separate Workshop on Divisions 5 of the
new proposed plat ordinance. He said this relates to County review of
municipal action in the approval of a plat. Mr. Birken further stated
there was no input out to the public on this, and when he left the
meeting, they were on page 25.
The City Attorney felt that the City Council may want to invite the
Chairman to come to Tamarac, for some dialogue.
Evan Cross, the City Planner, said this involves compliance with the
Broward County Land Use Plan, with the ordinance being a portion of
this. But, there was discussion held on amending the Land Use Plan,
-22- 2/11/81
mr/
L _A
L I
to include items that are in the ordinance.
Mr. Birken said the new ordinance talks about Independent Review, which
is not good for the City, regardless of whatever manner in which the City
would be handling the plat review.
Mr. Cross said that by motion, Harry Stewart was requested to include
non. -approval of any plats in a City,where they are not involved in the
11201" program.
Mayor Falck said he was particularly interested in sections that were
lifted out of the State Code for education; and felt that the School
Board had difficulty -getting things done, and once the platting ordinance
Tape is approved, it would be impossible.
#8
C/M Disraelly MOVED that Temp. Reso. #1836 be adopted, with the follow-
ing recommendations:
1) That the Chairman of the Broward County Commission be invited to
explain the posture of the County, as far as the cities are concerned.
2) The City Attorney be authorized to continue to work in monitoring
the Platting Ordinance, to provide Council with proper guidance.
3) Request that the County Commission hold a separate Workshop, on those
portions of the Platting Ordinance, relating to the cities; such as
Section 4.
4) That the cities be allowed to speak at their Workshop.
C/W Kelch SECONDED the MOTION.
VOTE, C/M Zemel
- Absent
C/W Kelch --
Aye
C/M Disraelly
- Aye
V/M Massaro
- Aye
Mayor Falck
- Aye
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
25. Edgewater Village - Discussion and possible action on a request to waive
certain warranty bond requirements.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Further delivery of amendments
or bonds not required for this project, which is
a warranty bond, and not a performance bond.
Dick Rubin said that Council was aware that the City's ordinance does
require a warranty bond for all subdivisions, for one year after the
development is completed. The City, he said, by resolution, accepted
this development on April 23, 1980, and they were required to submit
a bond, to which they concurred. The City Attorney, he said, researched
the warranty bond, because it was made out to the developer, and not
the City. He further explained there was two months left to their one
year warranty period, and was looking for assistance.
V/M Massaro indicated that this project was one of the finest in the
City, with everything in the engineering aspect being done, and more.
She spoke with the engineer this morning, in order to determine whether
there were any problems with this project, and whether a new bond was
necessary; to which Mr. Keating responded that a new bond was not neces-
sary. She MOVED that they not be required to deliver any further amend-
ments or bonds for this project, because it involves a warranty bond,
and not a performance bond. C/M Disraelly SECONDED the motion.
Mr. Birken advised that approximately six or seven projects which have
the same situation, where the bonds and Letters of Credit had lapsed.
He felt that Council would want to treat them on an individual basis,
but a precedent might be established. fie said that the City Clerk now
has the responsibility to see that they don't lapse.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
38. Letter of Interest for Financial Assistance for a Bicycle Route System -
Temp. Reso. #1849.
-23-
2/11/81
mr/
L
� r �
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
relating to Letters
(See pages 10, 11 &
Adopted, as amended,
of Interest.
23)
RESOLUTION NO.R- rl PASSED.
The City Planner advised that one of the regulations related to a number
of energy saving items, with one eligible item being a "bike -path", under
the grant. He discussed this with the City Manager and Recreation
Director, and it was determined that the grant would involve a contribu-
tion of 700, with the City's cost being 30%.Mr. Cross explained a
coordinated route system, of one continuous bike path sidewalk situa-
tion, running along Southgate Boulevard down University Drive, on the
west side; connecting to Commercial Boulevard to Pine Island Road; then
bringing it in from the west to McNab Road. He said they would attempt
to use the areas that presently have existing sidewalks, where possible.
Mr. Cross displayed a diagram indicating the various sidewalk areas,
and the planned program of sidewalk construction. He recommended con-
structing an asphalt bicycle path along the west side of University
Drive, from Southgate or Cypress. Creek Commons, down to Commercial
Boulevard. He further stated there is an existing sidewalk on Commer-
cial Boulevard to Pine Island Road.
C/M Disraelly indicated that the sidewalk on Commercial Boulevard, was
adjacent to very heavy traffic, with the light posts being embedded in
the sidewalk.
Mr. Cross advised Council that he rides his bicycle to work every day,
coming down Commercial Boulevard, which has a seven (7) foot wide side-
walk, and the light posts come out to 18 inches. He further stated
that the shopping center to be built on Southgate Boulevard, will be
required to build a sidewalk; plus small areas on Pine Island Road, where
sidewalks will be constructed, namely, Woodview, the area of the Fire
Station and the Mobil Station. He noted that the City would be connected
with a route into the heart of the City, to major shopping centers, two
existing parks, the elementary school, library, hospital and the post
office. From the area of Nab Hill, he noted that Tamarac Gardens will
be constructing a sidewalk, on the south side of McNab Road, from Nob
Hill Road, to where Lime Bay begins.
Mr. Cross indicated there is no sidewalk from Westwood Boulevard West
to Westwood Boulevard East; and construction would be necessary in that
area. He further stated that going west from University Drive, there
will be a seven (7) foot sidewalk constructed, from 64th Avenue into
University Drive. The City Planner indicated that the grant would in-
clude a bicycle or pedestrian path from Nob Hill Road to 64th Avenue,
and a portion would shift to the north side, which involved the golf
course. Additionally, he stated, the sidewalks would involve 21,000
linear feet, at $3.50 per linear foot, for a five (5) foot wide asphalt
sidewalk to be constructed, totaling approximately $73,000.00. He also
noted that working with the Public Works Director, would involve an
additional $3,500, for signage and striping, in order to delineate the
bicycle path route. He indicated that 57th Street could be used, which
would require $16,000 additional expense, for new construction.
The City Planner indicated that his $76,000 figure was one -quarter of
the monies available to the area. He responded to a question by C/W
Kelch, by stating that the City's labor could be included within the
package.
C/W Kelch inquired of the County Engineering Department, to ascertain
whether it was legal to use a pedestrian sidewalk, as a bicycle route;
with assurance that there was no law within the County, to prohibit such
use. She requested that the Letters of Interest language be clarified.
Mr. Cross said that the Federal Register of December 1, 1980, was not
asking for an application, but requesting that a Letter of Interest be
submitted to the local Department of Transportation office, with the
proposal, which involves a six -page matter. It indicates that the City
of Tamarac is interested in applying for funds under the program, for
a bicycle path route system.
C/W Kelch further stated that an explanation of the Letters of Interest
--24- 2/11/81
mr/
14
should be clarified by the City Attorney, especially indicating who has
to sign them.
Mr. Cross said the Letter of Interest which he prepared, was going to
be signed by the City Manager, as per requirements of the Federal Regis-
ter. He also noted that Section 1 states that the City Council gives
the City Manager authorization to apply for the funds, with the Letter
of Interest being the application.
Mayor Falck felt that the plan set forth by the City Planner might not
be the ideal situation, but does give the Council something to work
with, as relates to existing and non --existing sidewalks, which is
practical. ,
C/M Disraelly MOVED to adopt Temp. Reso. #1849, as amended, relating
to Letters of Interest, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE.
Mr. Cross advised Council that the City will be applying for three
grant applications at this time.
31. Drainage Tm xovements in the City- Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to 2/25/81
V/M Massaro concurred with C/M Zemel that this item could be tabled
at this time, because there is nothing significant to be discussed,
with over $400,000 being monitored, which has been approved. She also
stated that some of the easements are forthcoming.
C/M Zemel MOVED to TABLE this item, and V/M Massaro SECONDED, indicating
that Item #31 could be heard at the 2/25/81 meeting.
VOTE:
LEGAL AFFAIRS
ALL VOTED AYE.
14. Off --Street Parkin Re uirements -- Tem . Ord. #832 - Discussion and
possible action to amend Code Section 18, to allow zero degree or
ninety degree parking under Sec. 18-3(i)(c). First Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: DENIED
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #832, and explained that the ordinance
states that with 90' degree parking, there is no hardship involved, but
it would be at the discretion of Council.
C/M Disraelly felt that upon passage of this ordinance, anyone could
come in with ninety degree or any type parking, with every business
enterprise, which would create many problems. He MOVED to DENY
Temp. Ord. #832, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
C/W Kelch felt there was an inflexible law involved, and said this
ordinance permitted the waiver of certain conditions, and would give
the City an opportunity to judge property on its merits.
Mr. Birken indicated there are standards involved, but the ordinance
does provide that the waiver would be for unusual traffic conditions.
C/M Disraelly said if this is a developer's proposal, he was definitely
not in favor of it.
The City Attorney stated that he wrote the ordinance, which originated
from discussions at a Council meeting, with provisions in Chapter 18,
which related to labor. lie felt that Sec. 18-3(i)(c) could be repealed.
VOTE: C/M Zemel -
Aye
C/W Kelch --
Nay
C/M Disraelly -
Aye
V/M Massaro -
Absent
Mayor Falck -
Aye
-25- 2/11/81
mr/
32. City Council
C/M Zemel discussed the blasting, and the meeting which was held with
Sections 23, 24 and Spring Lake, last week, and the attendance Of
Comm. Craft, City Attorney and the City Manager. He said that another
was to be held on Thursday, 2/12/81..at 3:00 P.M., with other groups
to be in attendance, from Coral Springs.
C/M Disraelly advised that a request was made by Jack Slutsky, who is
connected with the AMVETS,about awards that were presented to members
of the Police Department. They were interested in displaying a case
for awards and trophies, in the entrance corridor of the City Hall, for
which they would incur the'expense. It would not be limited to any
particular group, if they were charitable or a non-profit organization.
Mr. Birken felt that it would bind the Council in perpetuity, to main-
tain particular space, to which C/M Zemel felt this would involve a
Tape danger area, because of the many organizations in the City,that present
09 awards, namely FOP, DAV, JWV, Italian American Club and the American
Legion, and felt further consideration should be given.
Mayor Falck felt the City Hall space problem should be determined, prior
to approval of this display case.
C/W Kelch concurred that many organizations were involved, and wondered
where the line would be drawn.
Ma or Falck said that between Lakes 1 and 2, the roadway was being used
for a dumping situation, at the end of this section. He felt the DOT
should close off this property, and give thought and consideration to
the City,in acquisition 6f this property. He said it was specifically
used for I--95 fill, and recommended that the City Attorney investigate
this.
33. City Manager
Mrs. Stuurmans advised that bids were solicited for electrical key
control of the City gasoline pumps, with one .response having been re-
ceived on Monday, 2/9/81. She requested that Council approve the re-
jection of this bid, which response was not properly completed, and per-
mit a rebid on this item; also changing the format, by soliciting a bid
for the Public Works Department. At TU West the gas is only pumped during
the day, and each tank is locked, which is controlled by John Monek.
39. Key Control for the Gas Pumps - Authorizing the City Manager to go out
for new bids, and rejecting the present bid.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Bids to be rejected, and
City Manager authorized to go out for new bids
for Public Works fifty (50) Key Controls of the
gas pumps.
C/W Kelch MOVED to AGENDIZE the item of Key Control for the Gas Pumps,
BY CONSENT, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE.
C/M Disraelly MOVED to .REJECT the bids received for the Gas Pumps, and
the City Manager be authorized to go out for new bids, for the Public
Works Fifty (50) Key Controls of the gas pumps.
Mr. Birken advised that the basis for the rejection was due to the omis-
sion of a signature for the bid, and no bid on the pump for Utility West,
which was originally required in the specifications.
C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
=60
2/11/81
mr/
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:30 P.M.
ATTEST:
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
A
This public document was promulgated at a cost of $ or $13 0.(
per copy, to inform the general public and public officers and employees
about recent opinions and considerations by the City Council of the City
of Tamarac.
APPROVED BY
CITY COUNCIL ON
-27- 2/11/81
mr/