HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-02-27 - City Commission Regular Meeting MinutesL-1
C -J
tq
7A ,
n
--- �� R1�'.—. _.
P. O. BOX 25010
TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33320
FIRST CLASS MAIL
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 27 1980
CALL TO ORDER: 9:30 A.M.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF TIME ALLOCATIONS - MOTIONS TO TABLE - The
Chair at this time, will announce those items which have been
given a specific time to be heard, and will entertain motions
from Council members to table those items which require addi-
tional research. Council may agendize by majority consent,
matters of an urgent nature which have come to Council's
attention after publication of this agenda.
TAMARAC UTILITIES - WEST
(2/27-pgs.1-9)
1. Status Report - Operations - Discussion and possible (2/29-pgs.1,2)
action. ( 3/6--pg. 1)
2. Report on Moratorium - Discussion and possible action. (2/27-pgs.11,12)
(2/29-pgs.1,2)
3. Interim Lar e User Agreement with Broward Count (3/6-pg.1)Tbld.to - Report 3/12
by City Attorney - Discussion and possible action. (2/27-pg.11 Agree
4. Developers' Agreements for Water and Sewer Connections - (2/27-pg.11)
Discussion and possible action. (2/29-pgs.1,2)
,gs.1-4)
5. Discussion and possible action on payment due Marmon Corp (2/29-p4s,2,3 &5)
under adjustments at closing for Tamarac Utilities. Appd.
6. Consent Agenda - Items listed under Item #6, Consent (2/27-pg.13)
Agenda are viewed to be routine and the recommendation ) thru j) Appd.,
will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. aith correc.to g)
There will be no separate discussion of these items. If f total figure
discussion is desired, then the item(s) will be removed $874.41
from the Consent Agenda, and will be considered sepa-
rately.
a) Minutes of 1/23/80 - Regular Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
b) Minutes of 1/25/80 -- Reconvened Regular Meeting - Ap-
proval recommended by City Clerk.
c) Minutes of 2/11/80 - Special Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
d) Minutes of 2/13/80 - Regular Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
1
e) Alan F. Ruf - Consulting Attorney - 2/22/80 -- $1,460.00
Approval recommended by City Attorney.
f) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer -
2/5/80 - Retainer $100.00 - Approval recommended by City
Engineer.
g) Mitchell Ceasar - Grants Consultant - 2/11/80 - $833.33
Retainer, plus $41.53 Expenses - Total $874.86 - Approva
recommended by Finance Director.
h) Baker Marine Enterprises - Cypress Creek Commons Con-
struction - 2/11/80 - $11,000.00 - Approval recommended
by City Planner.
i) Apelquist Construction Co. - Fire Station #2 -- 2/18/80 -
$12,761.18 - Approval recommended by City Manager.
j) Bid Authorization - Police Department - 16 millimeter
roll microfilm reader-printet -- Approval recommended by
City Manager.
PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS - 1:30 P.M.
PAGE TWO.
(correc. to
$874.41)
7. Distributive Education Clubs of America - DECA - Presenta- (2/27-pg.18)
tion of a Proclamation by Mayor Falck declaring the Week of
February 24 through March 1, 1980 as Shoplifting Prevention
Week.
8. Lions Club - Presentation of a Proclamation by Mayor Falck (2/27-pg.19)
declaring the Month of March as Lions Eye Bank Month.
9. National Association of Retired Federal Employees Chapter (2/27-pg.18)
1698 - Presentation of a Proclamation by Mayor Falck de-
claring the Month of March as National Association of
Retired Federal Employees - Membership and Public Service
Month - in honor of the recently Chartered -Chapter #1698.
10. Em loyee Service Awards - Presentation of employee Five- (2/27-pg.19)
Year Pins by City Manager, Edward A. Gross, to Val Jakolenko
Public Works, Eugene Letteney -- Public Works, and Robert
Rippey - Public Works.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 2:00 P.M.
11. Site Plan Procedures - Temp. Ord. #725 - Amending Code (2/27-pg.19)
Section 7-10 by permitting a single family subdivision ORD.80-32
developer to submit only a final site plan to Planning Com-
mission and only final plats on individually platted lots.
Discussion and possible action. Second Reading.
12. Comprehensive Regulations - Tamarac Utilities -- West -
Temp. Ord. #726 - Relating to rates, service, new develop-
ment, etc. Discussion and possible action - Second Reading.
(2/27-pg.19,20
(2/29-pg.3)Tbd
(3/6-pg.5)Tbld
to 3/12
13. Administrative Refund of Fees - Tem . Ord. #727 - Discussion (2/27-pgs.20,
and possible action to amend Code Section 2-3 by permitting 21)
the City Manager to administratively refund certain fees ORD.80-33
collected. Second Reading.
LEGAL
14. Woodmont North Golf Course - Vacation of Covenant - Temp. 2/27-pgs.13,14
Reso. #1510 - Discussion and possible action to approve a RESO.80-34
vacation of covenant for Parcels R-1 through R-10; and
authorizing appropriate City Officials to execute same.
(2/27-pgs.14-
15. Woodmont North Golf Course -- Easement Vacations - Discussion 16)
and possible action to approve 24 vacations of utility ease- RESOS.80-48
ments; each by separate Resolution Nos. #1522 through #1545. thru 80-63
PAGE THREE.
2/27-pgs.16-18
16. Woodmont North Golf Course - Acceptance of Drainage and RESO.80-35 thru
Utility Easements - Discussion and possible action to 80-47
accept 10 Grants of Easements for underground drainage and
Utility facilities; each by separate Resolution Nos. #1512
through #1521.
17. Woodmont North Golf Course - Acceptance of Well Field (2/27-pg•18)
Easements - Temp. Reso. #1511 - Discussion and possible RESO.80-33
action to accept 6 Well Field Easements in Land Sections
4, 5, 6 by one Resolution.
18. Wedgewood - Discussion and possible action on: (2/27-pgs•24-26
_.- RESO.80-73
a) Progress of outstanding matters of concern.
b) Road Dedications - Temp. Reso. #1075
(2/27-pg.21)
19. Tamarac Sho pin Plaza - Litigation - Discussion and pos- Site Plan exten
sible action. to 3/26/80
20. Sign Ordinance - Temp. Ord. #670 - Discussion and possible 2/27--pgs.21-23)
action to adopt a new comprehensive sign ordinance. ORD.80-34
Second Reading. (Public Hearing was held in December 1979)
21. Sign Permit Fees - Temp. Reso. #1489 - Discussion and pos- (2/27-pg.23)
sible action to adopt fees for sign permits, pursuant RESO.80-71,
to Temp. Ord. #670. as amended.
22. Recreation Land Dedication - Temp. Ord. #622 - Providing (2/27-pg.26)
for Council prerogative for dedication of land or submis- REJECTED
sion of money for new residential developments. Discus-
sion and possible action - Second Reading. (Public Hearing
held July 1979') .
23. Consultants' Competitive Ne otiations Act - Tem . Reso. (2/27-pg.28)
#1509 - Discussion and possible action to urge the Broward RESO.80--29
Legislative Delegation to sponsor an amendment to this act
by permitting governmental agencies more flexibility in
retaining consultants.
24. Employment Agreement - Police Department and Fire Depart- (2/27--pgs.28,29;
ment - Discussion and possible action to approve a form Tbld. to 3/12
agreement whereby Police and Fire Officers, whose training
is paid by the City, would reimburse the City if they ter-
minate employment within 2 years.
25. Broward County - Rezoning - Discussion and possible action (2/27-pg.29)
on request by residents of Bermuda Club for assistance to No action taken
deny rezoning of North Lot 3, Land Section 11-49-41 by
Broward County from residential to industrial.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
(2/27-pgs.23,24
26. Isles of Tamarac - New Model/Sales Com2lex - Discussion Amended site
and possible action on the recently constructed model/ plan appd.
sales complex.
27. Sign Waiver Request - Gloria and Maggie's Dog Beauty (2/27-pg.24)
Salon - Temp. Reso. #1546 - Discussion and possible action RESO.80-30
on request for waiver of the sign ordinance to permit one
additional sign for this business on the north side of the
property.(6660 N.W.57th St. -Financial Federal Plaza)
28. Woodmont - Tract 49 - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan
b) Plat - Temp. Reso. #1547
c) Developers' Agreement
(2/27-pgs.26--28
RESO.80-72 as
amended
) (2/29-pg.5)Tbd,
(3/6-pg.5) No
action taken
PAGE FOUR.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
(2/27-pg.29)
29. Fire Department - Pumper Fire_ Truck -- Discussion and pos- ESO.80-28
sible action relating to the financial arrangements for
payment of the pumper truck, for the bid awarded at
the February 25, 1980 Special Meeting.
30. Florida De artment of Law Enforcement Agreement -- Temp._ (2/27-pgs.29,30
Reso. #1548 - Discussion and possible action to approve an RESO.80-31
agreement for use of a communications terminal for criminal
justice information.
31. Bid Award - Sunshine Plaza Force Main - Tem2. Reso. #1549-(2/27-pg.9)
Discussion and possible action to award a bid for construc- RES0.80-32
tion of a force main at Sunshine Plaza. H & H Eng'g.
Y_IMPTAI JUS
32. City Council
33. City Manager
34. City Attorney
Copies of Legislation to be considered are available for
reviewing and purchase in the Office of the City Clerk.
CITY OF TAMARAC
MARILYN BERTHOLF,
CITY CLERK
SUBSEQUENT PUBLIC HEARINGS/SPECIAL MEETINGS/WORKSHOPS
February 25, 1980 - 10:30 A.M. - Workshop Meeting
Comprehensive Plan -- Elements
1:30 P.M. - Special Meeting -- Bid Award - Fire Department
Pumper Truck - Temp. Reso. #1508
2:00 P.M. - Workshop Meeting - Comprehensive Regulation -
Tamarac Utilities - Tea. Ord. #726
February 27, 1980 - 7:00 P.M. - Public Hearing.- Comprehensive
Plan - Elements
February 29, 1980 -- 9:30 A.M. - Reconvened Regular Meeting
(2/29-pgs.3,4,
&5)
AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
35. Tamarac Utilities - West - Sewer Flow Meter - Discussion (2/27-pg.9,10)
and possible action. urchased autho
36. Fire Engine Loan -- Century Bank - Temp. Reso. #1567 /6--pgs.5,6)
N(3ES0.80-74
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 27, 1980
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Falck called the meeting to order on Wednesday,
February 27, 1980, at 9:30 A.M., in the Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Walter W. Falck
Vice-Playor Helen Massaro
Councilman Irving M. Disraelly
Councilman Harry Wiener
Councilwoman Marjorie Belch
ALSO PRESENT:
City Manager, Edward A. Gross
City Attorney, Arthur M. Birken
City Clerk, Marilyn Bertholf
MEDITATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Falck called for a Moment of
Silent Meditation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Falck reviewed the schedule of items,also indicating that a Public
Hearing will be held at 7:00 P.M., relating to six elements on the Compre-
hensive Planning Act. These items, he said, must be submitted to the Broward
Planning Council, the South Florida Regional Planning Council and the State,
with approval no later than July 1, 1980.
He additionally stated that if a reconvened meeting is required, it will be
held on Friday, February 29, 1980, at 9:30 A.M., in the Council Chambers.
V/M Massaro said that Item #5 was important to be heard, but there was a
request by Mr. Birken to schedule this for Mr. Ruf's presentation, on
Friday, February 29, 1980.
C/M Disraelly requested to be excused from the 7:00 P.M. meeting, due to
a previous commitment.
TAMARAC UTILITIES - WEST
1. Status Report -- Operations - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Council approved trip to Atlanta for
City Engineer, City Planner and Tony Nolan; authorization
given to hire contractor to cure the infiltration.
VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT WAS REQUESTED FOR ITEM #1
TONY NOLAN: Actually, our involvement with the utility, the sewer plant
primarily took a drastic upturn in the past 2 1/2 to 3 weeks, subsequent
to some problems that manifested themselves, relating to flows. We have,
since the City Manager requested us to become involved, done some analysis
of the sewage treatment plant, the flows coming into the sewage treatment
plant, to try and come to grips with what appears to be the problem. Our
initial concern was that the sewage treatment plant was not working prop-
erly, and perhaps that was the cause of some hydraulic overloads that
appeared to be washing solids out of the system into the receiving water.
After spending some time reviewing the flow figures; reviewing the pumping
figures out of the sewerage tank, we conclude that the sewerage tank is
in fact working properly.
However, even with modifications,that alone will not arrest the problem.
The problem is related to the volume of flows coming through the sewerage
treatment plant, for the length of time that these sewerage flows or peak
flows come through, and the plant's inability to cope with them. Last
Sunday night, we sent two members of our staff, and three members of the
utility staff, through several portions of the collection system, to try
and isolate some areas where we may have experienced some high infiltra-
tion flows. They reported back to us on Monday morning, that they think
they have isolated something in the vicinity of a half -a -million gallons
of excess infiltration.
These infiltration flows occur in five areas of the City, namely, Colony
Club, Sands Point, Sunflower, Lime Bay 2 and Westwood 3 (Section 20). The
flows, if you add them up, there again this is an empirical number, it's
EDITOR'S NOTE: Westwood 3 is
Section 21 (pages 1 & 2)
-1-
2/27/80
mr/
L.
77
not a measured number. They estimate something between 500 and 600
thousands of gallons a day.
C/M DISRAELLY: Which Section is Westwood 3?
and C/W KELCH:
MR. NOLAN: Westwood 3 is Section 20, I believe, as you know it.
C/M DISRAELLY: Okay, I was just trying to correlate.
MR. NOLAN: We've been in contact with a grouting contractor, and we
estimate the cost of making initial television runs through these 69 or
70 manhole sections. The secondary runs through to actually do the
grouting, the grouting expense themselves, and the possibility of maybe
two of the leaks that they find being inaccessible or ungroutable from
the inside, necessitating external repairs, will probably cost in the
vicinity of $50,000.00 total. And, we would strongly suggest that if
monies can be found, that emergency funds be appropriated to do this
work as quickly as possible.
V/M MASSARO: How many of the areas that you thought have infiltration?
All areas? I missed that part. There are five.....
MR. NOLAN: No, Ma'm, there are five areas, and actually six pump
station areas that we went into, that we feel there are excessive infil-
tration problems, and those areas were Westwood Community 3, Lime Bay 2,
Sunflower 1 and 2, Sands Point and Colony Club. The major problems nat-
urally are the areas we would go into first.
V/M MASSARO: What I am trying to find out, Tony, when you say $50,000,
are you talking about that $50,000 would take care of all of these five
infiltration points, that you have already....
MR. NOLAN: I haven't reduced any of this to writing, because it has
been in formulative process since Monday morning. What we are conjec-
turing is that there are approximately 21,000 lineal feet of pipe out
there that need to be sewered; that need to be TV'd. That's to isolate
the exact areas where infiltration problems occur. That's approximately
$12,200. There is reason to believe that we will have to go back into
portions of these systems, the second time, after the leaks have been
isolated, to grout. Now, what we've estimated is that 50% of that pipe
flow will be back in a second time. That cost is about $4200.00. We've
estimated that we will find 30 leaks in the system, and that each leak
will require 25 gallons of grout for repair, and the cost of the grout
is $7.50 a gallon, and that is $5600.00_ We've also estimated that we
may find as many as two major leaks that will have to be repaired from
the outside. If we have to repair them from the outside, it can cost as
much as $15,000.00 each to fix.
C/M DISRAELLY: $15,000.00 each?
MR. NOLAN: Each. That adds up to $52,000.00. Now, bear in mind,
that the City has an application with the Environmental Protection Agency
to receive federal financing or federal funding for a Step 1 application,
for this very type work. We understand that the City has been placed on
a priority list for 1981, Fiscal Year 1981. That doesn't help us too
much right now. We originally, I guess, considered that being there was
excessive infiltration problems, that we could rely upon the intercon-
nect with the County System temporarily, and wait for the federal funding
to come along, and make the necessary repairs with federala.ssistance. The
problem has become acute at this point, and I don't believe that we ought
to delay, until federal funds are available. We ought to make the sewage
treatment plant capacity available for future connections and additional
development.
However, there are provisions in the Federal Regulations in the Environ-
mental Protection Agency's Rules and Regulations, for circumstances simi-
lar to these. It's a portion of the Federal Register that was published
in September, 1978, that deals with limitations upon project costs and
curb prior to award. We've made preliminary contact with the Environ-
mental Protection Agency yesterday afternoon, and discussed the problem
with them, and they said there is a possibility, if we proceed on a course
prescribed by them, that when monies become available to the City, through
the grant process, that we will be reimbursed for the monies expended at
this point. Now, it is a possibility, that's not a certainty. However,
I think that it would be our recommendation that you proceed with the
EDITOR'S NOTE: Westwood 3 -2-
is Section 21 (pages 1 & 2)
2/27/80
mr/
�. J
procedures, to at least place yourselves in the posture that you may re-
ceive the funds when they become available.
In support of this, we're in the process, in the City Engineer's office
of corresponding with, or letters having been drafted this morning, and
being hand -carried to Juan Strom's office, that's the Department of En-
vironmental Regulation Region, requesting that he confirm that there is
a health hazard involved, with all excessive flow problems at the Tamarac
W. Sewage Treatment Plant. We've also contacted the regional office
that's in Ft. Lauderdale, and the person involved, that is Bob Rudolph,
and this morning asked him to be supportive of our position, and that
Mr. Strom needs confirmation from him. He said that he will do that.
Mr. Strom hopefully will write this letter to the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency today. Your Assistant.City Engineer is in the West Palm Beach
Office of the Flood Control District, which is shared by the Department
of Environmental Regulations. He will then be in a position to hand -
carry that letter back to us tonight,. We've made tentative arrange-
ments, for tomorrow, if you all authorize it, for people to meet with
the Environmental Protection Agency, in Atlanta, tomorrow morning, to
carry out the remaining portions of the process that has to be followed,
so that we can be in a position to receive funds when they become avail-
able.
V/M MASSARO: Mr. Mayor, I think before Tony goes on, so that we don't
miss -up on anything, and so that it's fresh in everybody's mind, while
we discuss this, I think that we should react to this. It's really a
request now, that somebody go to Atlanta tomorrow, because if this re-
quest is not submitted at the proper time, and if these things aren't
followed through properly, we may not be in a position to recover this
money. I think it's most important that we do try to put ourselves in
a position where it can be recovered, because after all, we are all aware
of the fact that these different departments that do give these grants,
frown upon paying for anything that has been previously done. So, it
sounds like we are in a strong position here, and I don't think that we
should do anything that would perhaps destroy this possibility.
I would MOVE that Mr. Nolan be authorized to go to Atlanta tomorrow,
inasmuch as he is so thoroughly familiar with everything that is being
done, that needs to be done, and that should be done, and not only in
this matter, but he also would be in a position to try to do a little
research while he's there, and become acquainted with people who can
help us perhaps further with other work in the utility, or hopefully,
the drainage in the City. I FURTHER would like to suggest, and would
also, in this same MOVE, suggest that inasmuch as Evan Cross is the man
who is strong and needs to be involved in everything that relates to
grants, that tie be authorized to go as well,, so that he could meet these
people, so that he's no longer a faceless figure on the telephone, and
a personal contact, a personal hello, is worth a lot of money, I think.
And, I would MOVE that these two men be authorized to go to Atlanta
tomorrow.
MR. GROSS: I would first like to find out if Tony can go tomorrow.
MR. NOLAN: I would think that it would probably be more appropriate
for your City Engineer to go, if he can find the time in his schedule
to make it, for the mere simple point that the line of communication
between the City and the Environmental Protection Agency has to be
developed. This is only one of many grants that we're going to hopefully
be soliciting from them.
V/M MASSARO: Mr. Mayor, I would have no objection then, if Mr. Nolan
has the time, and can make the time, I would have no objection if the
third man went. I think it's important for Evan to go. The cost of
the additional man is negligible, in view of all that has to be done
here, and the monies that we have to spend. But, I think that the in-
formation at Tony's fingertips, is very important, and he knows these
people, and I think that too, is very important.
C/M
DISRAELLY: Actually, Tony, in what you have been describing, or have
indicated to us, there would be three grants involved, at this particular
moment, that you could foresee. The one that has already been applied
for, for the study of the infiltration; that has been already asked for
or requested. The second is the follow-through of the engineering, which
I think was discussed previously, after this inspection has been made,
-3- 2/27/80
mr/
I
for what engineering will be done. And, this would be a third grant,
or will this be part of the second?
MR. NOLAN: In the area of Environmental Protection Agency grant pro-
cedures, you've got 3 step process with SSES, the Sewer System Evaluation
Study. The first step is what has been applied for. Then there is a
second step and a third step; with the third step being the construction,
the actual remedial work that's done to the system. That's in essence
what I've suggested you all consider authorizing as an emergency expen-
diture now. That's the portion that would become eligible at a sub-
sequent time for reimbursement from EPA. But, there is another area
that I think we ought to entertain as far as the grant is concerned,
and that's the portion of the interconnect system that will tie the
18 inch force main, east of the turnpike, or west of the turnpike, to-
gether. That's an entirely different subject altogether, and I wasn't
going to confuse the issue, by bringing it up at this point.
C/M DISRAELLY: My question was this one that you are referring to today,
would be the third phase of what we have already started.
MR. NOLAN: The third phase of the the three -step process, yes sir.
C/M DISRAELLY: And your feeling is that it could be, after your discus-
sions today, it could be an after -the -fact item.
MR. NOLAN: Yes, sir. The Environmental Protection Agency really
frowns upon reimbursable funding; funding after the fact. They like to
participate in it from the very beginning. We've initiated the process
they're in the process themselves right now, and I think it's just a
question of adhering to the guidelines that they establish. In order to
insure that if, and it's always an if, and if the funds become available,
and if we are on a priority list, and if they decide to allocate funds
to us at some future date, a portion of that allocation will be reim-
bursed to this expense.
C/M DISRAELLY: Mr. Mayor, I wanted clarification, and based on that, I
think that it is important for the City Engineer, as Tony has indicated,
to go there, to meet these people, because with him it will be a con-
tinuing process, and there might be other grants, as the Vice -Mayor has
indicated, for Evan to go. And, if Tony is available, and can get there,
as he discussed for tomorrow, I would SECOND that all three appropria-
tions be made for all three to go.
V/M MASSARO: I think we should find out first, Mr. Mayor, whether
Mr. Nolan is available for tomorrow.
MR. NOLAN: I can make the time, and I am available.
C/M DISRAELLY: You figure it is a one -day trip, up and back?
MR._ NOLAN: Oh, yes, it's up and back.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE.
MAYOR FALCK: I believe we ought to also consider the first proposal
that Mr. Nolan advanced, so that we do not get ourselves lost and
bogged down, as relates to the infiltration and the funding for cor-
recting that particular item.
V/M MASSARO: We have a $52,000.00 amount that we would have to report.
Is there anything within this $52,000.00 estimated,cost.... Is it an
estimated cost?
MR. NOLAN: It is an estimated cost, yes.
V/M MASSARO: That's what I am getting at, so that if you find that
we don't have the leaks that you anticipate to find, the number of
leaks, and that there aren't two major leaks; it would be diminished
by these amounts of money?
MR. NOLAN: Yes, I have tried to prepare the maximum exposure the
City might expect from the grouting contractor. Now, what I am trying
to say to you, is that it may very well be that we don't have to go
through the full 21,000 lineal feet to find that much infiltration.
And, it's a question of where, in good judgment, you want to stop. It
may also be that we find that there are 14,000 lineal feet that have to
be entered the second time. And, there is a procedure that the contrac--
-4-
2/27/80
mr/
� � r
for is using that could very likely overcome the $15,000.00 per expendi-
tures that was estimated for the two major breaks. We don't know that
there are two major breaks in there, by the way. But, what I am trying
to get at is that there is a procedure that this contractor that we've
talked to has developed, that allows him to make some repairs internally,
that heretofore have not been possible. And, we'd be willing to recom-
mend that you authorize him to go ahead and try, anyhow, at least once.
That reduces that $15,000.00 down to about $2,000, and I think if he
has some kind of track record, with that kind of procedure, that we
ought to at least give him an opportunity to prove it.
V/M MASSARO: I would also like to ask Mr. Birken, what are we up
against here? Of course we realize this is an emergency, because the
infiltration is so great, and is cutting our ability to properly take
care of the people we are servicing. We wouldn't certainly want this
to get any worse. So, is this something that can be done with getting„
...without going to bid?
MR. BIRKEN: If there is an emergency, and Council makes finding of
facts, and specifies what the emergency is, which seems to be very
clear. And, I would assume that if repairs are not made, the leaks are
going to get bigger and worse, if they are not made quickly. So, that
time is clearly of the essence for many purposes, not only economically,
but for health purposes. There is no necessity to go to bids. It should
be that finding of the emergency, and designation of what firm you are
going to be hiring, the upset fee, and there should be some designation
where the money is coming from.
V/M MASSARO: I would further like to ask Mr. Nolan.. you have gotten
these figures from one particular firm?
MR. NOLAN: We've contacted two firms.
V/M MASSARO: You have. You have two different sets of figures from
them now?
MR. NOLAN: They are virtually identical.
V/M MASSARO: But, you would be able to submit more than one set to
the City Manager, because even in an emergency, we're supposed to be
able to submit more than one set of figures. I think I've asked the
questions that I'd like to ask on this.
C/M DISRAELLY: You've already indicated, Tony, that if we provide these
funds, that the work has been started for the refunding, if possible
by EPA, in 1981. So they'll be aware of the situation.
MR. NOLAN: Yes, the expenditure of any funds, any emergency funds
that you would make, would be subsequent to our meeting with the
Environmental Protection Agency, and at least finding out what their
ground rules are, so that we don't inadvertently violate some sacred
law up there.
C/M DISRAELLY: Which would be checked out when you went up there tomorrow,
so that if there was a problem, you would then come back to us before...
MR. NOLAN Yes, if you reconvene Friday, then someone would be here
to be able to talk to you about our meeting,in Atlanta.
C/M DISRAELLY: So, if there is a problem, we can amend or adjust to that
situation.
V/M MASSARO: Thank you, Mayor. Mr. Nolan, are there any additional
engineering fees attached to this $52,000.00 upset price?
MR. NOLAN: The contractor estimated that he could do this work in
approximately three weeks. I would like to be authorized to place a
man on the site for the three weeks that he is working. There would
be some minor office work involved, but I think that the on -site inspec-
tion is a must, particularly to insure what you are getting back...
V/M MASSARO:
fu: ►� a►
Can you give us a cost on what that would be, please.
It would be under $3,000.
-5-
2/27/80
mr/
C
C/M DISRAELLY:
$5,500 upset price.
V/M MASSARO: Okay, and there again, if they don't take three weeks
to do it, it would be pro -rated accordingly. Right?
MR. NOLAN: Yes, Ma'rm. It would be the same hourly rate that we
ordinarily charge, and it would be for time actually expended, yes.
V/M MASSARO: Mr. Mayor, I would like to MOVE that the City Manager be
authorized to ..
Can you tell me the name of the firm that you're suggesting here?
MR. NOLAN: The name of the firm that I spoke with specificity was
Shenandoah Excavating Contractors, a subsidiary of W. Jackson & Sons.
V/M MASSARO: They are excavating contractors?
MR. NOLAN: As well. My concern was getting a price from a contractor
that could not only cope with the internal work, but if we got to the
point where it was determined that external work had to be done, then
he had the equipment to do that too.
V/M MASSARO:
MR _ NnT.A,N -
V/M MASSARO:
And they are a subsidiary of what firm?
Bill Jackson & Sons. They could start next week.
Does that mean Monday?
MR. NOLAN: Yes Ma'm.
C/W KELCH: Before you make your motion, Helen, did you settle the
problem of the indication of where the money was coming from?
V/M MASSARO: Yes, I do have that. Mr. Gross just got the information
from upstairs.
Mr. Mayor, I would MOVE that, inasmuch as an emergency exists within
the utility plant, that because of the extensive infiltration that we
are experiencing, which has a very serious effect on the plant, in its
entirety, I would MOVE that the City Manager be authorized to approve
a contract with the Shenandoah Corporation, who are a subsidiary of
the W. Jackson & Sons, to do the work that is necessary to cure the
infiltration with the firm of Williams, Hatfield & Stoner over -seeing
it, and that this work be commenced on Monday, March 3, 1980, and the
money is to come from the Operating Repair of the Waste Water, #425-
368-525-462, for a sum not to exceed $55,000.00, which is an upset figure;
subject to adjustment. $52,000.00'is the estimated fees, as the tape
will indicate, and will certainly be transcribed in verbatim, and
$3,000 for the engineering inspection fee.
C/M DISRAELLY: It will be called to the attention of the people up there.
SECOND THE MOTION.
VOTE:
PAaM102a21.7W_A1VW
MR. NOLAN: Now, in a similar note, we, if you all recall, when we
purchased the utility from TUI, they had some TV and grouting equipment
that they had placed out of service, because of lack of personnel. We
have requested your Plant Operational Personnel to prepare a listing of
materials and costs that might be incurred, to place this equipment
back into service. It's our recommendation that efforts be made to
acquire the necessary personnel, to go through the training process,
and that would be part of the cost that they are going to bring back to
US. And, it would put this crew back in operation on a full-time basis.
It's my opinion that the televising and grouting process is a continual
process that ought to go on, irrespective of a grant application or
pending grant. There are areas in the system that are not a part of
the I.I. indication, as far as excess infiltration are concerned. We
are going to find out some things about that, tomorrow, too, but a point
in fact is that the City ought to be aware of what the problems are con-
tinuously. And, when we become a part of the County system, for trans-
mission and treatment, disposal of waste, we are going to be paying a
handsome fee to the County, to treat clean water. I don't believe that
the City, from a fiscal standpoint, should have to bear that burden.
-6-- 2/27/80
mr/
L
F I
That's why I've requested those numbers be brought back to you.
V/M MASSARO: That's nothing that needs to be acted on, because of
the fact that all this other work has to be done, and certainly this
could be reviewed between the City Engineer and Mr. Gross, and be ready
for it after the other work is completed.
MR. NOLAN: Yes, I am just trying to bring you up to speed as to
what our activities have been for the past three weeks. In another
area, that the Mayor mentioned a moment ago, about your agenda. The
City has received bids from two contractors, to complete the intercon-
nect. That interconnect, as you know, is going to allow the City to
transmit at the onset something that approaches a half -million gallons
of sewage a day to the County Plant and Treatment. The low bidder on
the project was H & H Construction Company, and the bid price was
$28,750.00. We have written a letter to Mr. Keating, with our recom-
mendations as far as the water is concerned.
In light of the fact that the problems that we've had at the sewage
treatment plant, and the necessity of expeditious responses, we've
asked the contractor if the City found itself in a position to authorize
the work to begin without going through the formalities of executing a
contract, and pre -construction meetings, and what not, could he com-
plete the work within the next two weeks. He said if he was authorized
to proceed with the work this week, he would be done in two weeks. And,
I throw that out to the City Attorney for consideration.
MR. BIRKEN: I don't think the contractor needs the pre -construction
meeting, if the bonds are posted, or any of that stuff.
MR. NOLAN: In any event, you have to award the bid, and get that
process in motion. We'll expedite that as quickly as we can. He did
say he was in a position to start work Monday morning.
V/M MASSARO: Total price, $35,000 ?
C/W KELCH: The second one, recommended H & H Construction, for
$28,750.
V/M MASSARO: On this, will there be any further engineering costs to
this, or do they take care of all of that?
MR. NOLAN: There will be inspection incurred during the construction.
We'd like to stop by several times during the course of construction,
to insure that the contract is conformed to the contract documents.
I believe that the work went more smoothly than we had anticipated, as
far as getting the project out to bid, and what -not. The money you
have authorized us to spend up -to, or the time you authorized us to
spend up -to, would be sufficient to bring it through completion. I
have an inspector who lives very close by, and he'll stop twice a day,
once coming in and once going out.
V/M MASSARO: I know you spoke of a figure that will bring it through
to completion. What figure are you talking about?
MR. NOLAN: You have already authorized to spend up -to a certain
amount of time and money on this project.
V/M MASSARO: $4,500.
MR. NOLAN: That's right. We feel comfortable with that ceiling figure,
that we'll be able to complete the project.
V/M MASSARO: Here again, Mr. Mayor, this is of utmost importance.
There is only one question. This is only phase 1 of the interconnects,
right? We do have another phase that we have to consider for a future
time? This would allow us, if we get this phase completed, it would
allow us to lift the moratorium. Is that true, providing that we go
forward with the second half of the connecting to the....
MR. NOLAN: In my judgment the lifting of the moratorium is a two-
phase proposition. Once you've initiated the grouting work, and executed
the contract, and we've got a completion date, I think you can set your
lifting date. But, what effectively we are going to do is we are going
to relieve the system of one-half million gallons of sewage to shift to
-7-
2/27/80
mr/
the County through this interconnect, and we are going to relieve the
system, hopefully, of a half a million gallons of infiltration. That
would relieve the sewage treatment plant capacity problem from its
present 4.7 million gallons a day, to 3.7 million gallons a day, which
will place us well within our hydraulic capacity. I think we'll have
no difficulty at that point to raise the moratorium.
V/M MASSARO: And you figure that it will take two weeks to do this
work?
MR. NOLAN: H & H Construction Company has told us that they are in
a position to complete this work in two weeks. We have allowed them
more, so that we didn't cause the price of the project to go up. They
assured us that the work will not take more than two weeks.
C/M DISRAELLY: This interconnect will not be large enough for the total,
when it takes place in 1983?
MR. NOLAN: That opens up another concern of ours, the City's that is.
And there are two pump stations designated by the 201 Study, to service
the City of Tamarac. This is merely one of those pump stations. The
other pump station is indicated to go on or about the location of your
present sewage treatment plant. Another pipe will have to be run not
in that direction, as the plant indicates a pipe to be located in
University Drive right-of-way, flowing north. I guess through Coral
Springs, and out that way. But, in any event, conversations with the
County last week, led us to believe that they think that the City can
sewer itself through that present pump station, Lift Station #14. We
don't believe that is the case, and we believe that in order to confirm
that, the City is going to have to do some additional study work, as
far as your pumping stations are concerned.
I've spoken to that in a letter to Mr. Gross, and I've suggested that
I will be coming back to you with a letter outlining the work that has
to be done, why it has to be done, and how much money I believe it's
going to cost.
C/M DISRAELLY: But this pump station will take a lot more than a million
and a half gallons?
MR. NOLAN: The pump station is designed to transmit 7,000,000 gallons
of sewerage to the County Waste Water Treatment Plant. Yes, sir. The
question arises to what part of the City will flow to that pump station,
and what part will be reserved to flow to another pump station.
C/M DISRAELLY: Theoretically, it could take most of the total City if
it was pumped into.
MR. NOLAN: No, not in the ultimate analysis it cannot. So, there's
12,000,000 gallons of sewerage that's going to be generated in this
portion of the City, at some point in the future. This pumping station
has the capability of handling 7,000,000 gallons, so there is at least
5,000,000 that has to go someplace else. And, all the indications that
I can get from Tamarac Utilities documentation, is that they never anti-
cipated sending anywheres near 7,000,000 gallons of sewerage to that
pump station.
V/M MASSARO: Well, we don't want to indicate that to anybody anyway,
because we'll get locked in on additional costs.
MR. NOLAN: We have not indicated it, but the County has asked, "well,
what area do you anticipate servicing through this pump station"? The
question goes unanswered. We don't know at this time.
C/M DISRAELLY: But, what they will be putting, what this company will be
putting in, will be sufficient for 7,000,000 as potential.
MR. NOLAN: The size of the pipe is problematical. I don't believe
we can get 7,000,000 gallons or average 7,000,000 gallons of sewage
through that pipe.
MAYOR FALCK: Well, actually the item for discussion, really is the
interconnect at the present time, is that right?
MR. NOLAN: The present interconnect, which is a completion of a
plan that was started by Tamarac Utilities Inc., prior to the City's
2/27/80
mr/
acquisition.
V/M MASSARO:
I think it would be well to make sure that Mr. Gross
copies us with this information that you are feeding us, at all times,
because if we follow through it makes it easier for everybody to under-
stand, and Z don't think that we should get into the other part of it.
That question should remain unanswered for some time.
MAYOR FALCK: Certainly additional studies need to be made, and addi-
tional, perhaps modifications of the plans that were originally drawn
up for that, would have to be taken into consideration.
MR. NOLAN: I think that the City has to address the overall planning
of its sewage collection transmission system at a very early date. The
need is two -fold. We have, in the modifications that we've spoken to,
with this $50,000.00 of grouting work, we haven't addressed one major
problem, that is a pumping station problem. We conjecture that it may
be a pumping station problem. We don't know if it is infiltration
problems as well.
Westwood Community 5 has a pumping station that can't keep up with the
flow in the lines. Now, we don't know that the pump has the capacity
to pump the sewage into this manifold pump station network, or if the
infiltration is so horrendous, that it can't ever get it out. And,
that's part of the analysis that I am talking about sending a letter
to Mr. Gross. I don't think that we ought to get too deeply involved
in that today, but you ought to bear in mind that it is coming.
MAYOR FALCK: We understand that, but I think that we should be direc-
ting our attention to the present.interconnection system at this time.
Tape V/M MASSARO: ....You authorize someone to go into that further, to
Side see what's going to occur with the second phase.
#2
MAYOR FALCK: But, that would come after we have had the opportunity
of reviewing the report that Mr. Nolan says that he has directed, or
is in the process of directing to the City Manager. Isn't that right?
MR. NOLAN: Yes, sir.
END OF VERBATIM.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
31. Did Award -- Sunshine Plaza Force Plain - Temp. Reso. #1549 - Discussion
and possible action to award a bid for construction of a force main at
Sunshine Plaza.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved - Contractor RESOLUTION.NO.R- aa' PASSED.
H & H Engineering Company.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1549.
C/M Disraelly indicated that input was received from the City Clerk,
as to a bid opening on Monday, February 25, 1930. He stated that two
bids were submitted, with the low bid being in the amount of $28,750.00
from H & H Engineering. Also,based on the input received this day from
Mr. Nolan, as to requirements for the tie --in with the County, he MOVED
that the bid of H & H Engineering, in -the amount of $28,750.00, for
the Sunshine Plaza Force Main, be approved. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
C/M Disraelly AMENDED HIS MOTION to include that the work would commence
as soon as possible, with completion, hopefully, in thirty days; also,
based on Temp. Reso. #1549, with funding to come from waste Water
Operating Repair Code #425-368-535-462. C/W Kelch concurred, as the
SECOND, with the amendment.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
35. Tamarac Utilities - West - Sewer Flow Meter - Discussion and possible
action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
Purchase authorized for Sewer Flow Meter
QaJ=
2/27/80
mr/
V/M Massaro recommended and MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT the Sewer
Flow Meter, for discussion and possible action, and C W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
V/M Massaro said that Mr. Gross submitted an inter -office memorandum,
and Mr. Nolan will address the subject.
Mr. Nolan advised that the interconnection was being made by the contract
previously awarded, as a permanent connection to the County facility.
He said that no additional work will have to be done, once the pumping
station has been completed. The pumping station piping is in, he said,
and the City was tieing -in to the permanent location for the permanent
facility. Mr. Nolan further stated that in the plan preparation pro-
cess, that the permanent meter has been installed by the contractor
who is building the station for the County. The plans went out, he
added, and the assumption was made that the meter that is there would
be the one metering the flow into the station, or by-pass the station.
But, he stated, that the County Utilities Administrators have advised
that they do not want the City to go through that meter, but to install
one temporarily.
Mr. Nolan stated that after a meeting with the County, and the dis-
closure of this position on their part, which occurred last week, it
was determined to not submit an addendum at this time. It was his sug-
gestion that this meter be purchased by the City, as recommended by
the City Manager's memorandum. He additionally stated that the meter
will not be wasted, and was a temporary -type installation, which could
be utilized for relocation to other areas by the City. Mr. Nolan felt
this could be used by the Utility Department for the next few years, in
order to ascertain flow determinations, as far as analysis of the various
pumping stations in the City's system.
Removal, he said, would be accomplished at the time the contractor turns
the station over to the County, for operation and maintenance, with the
last projection being made for August, 1980. The City's meter, he said,
would be used for determining costs and flow figures.
C/M Disraelly said that it was called to Council's attention that a
meter was lacking for measuring the flow, which is being provided by
the County for the tie-in between Tamarac Utilities West and the County
system. A determination has to be made for the amount of disposable
sewage flow, in order to evaluate the cost. Therefore, it is essential,
and MOVED for a sewer flow meter to be purchased, on emergency basis,
at a price of $3,000 plus the cost of installation, with a total upset
price of $4,000.
At the request of Mr. Birken, the MOTION WAS AMENDED to read that the
emergency is that the system is at capacity now. The interconnection
is necessary to protect the system and the interconnection cannot take
place without the meter. Also, since the meter is essential, the emer-
gency now exists.
It was noted by Mr. Nolan that the installation could be accomplished
with Sewage Treatment Plant Personnel, and the contractor does not
necessarily have to be involved.
C/M Disraelly AMENDED THE MOTION to include approximately $3,000 for
the meter, with funding to come from the Capital Construction Fund
#430--371-535-673, and $1,000 would be taken from the Operator Repair
Fund #425-368-535-462. C/W Kelch SECONDED THE ENTIRE MOTION.
C/M Wiener inquired whether bids were obtained for the meters, to which
Mr. Nolan advised that prices were requested, which were substantiated
as proper dollar expenditures, but bids have not been solicited.
V/M Massaro did indicate that bids will be solicited, in order to go
to the lowest bidder.
Larry Keating, the City Engineer, said that discussion is being held
for the interconnection to be completed two weeks from this coming
Monday, but the meter has to be ready prior to this operation. He
further stated that the County Commission approved the Interim Agreement
form, and anticipated that the City would approve this.
-10- 2/27/80
mr/
L
V/M Massaro indicated that quotations could be obtained by telephone.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
V/M Massaro inquired of Mr. Nolan, as to itemized bills being submitted
for upset bid projects, to which Mr. Nolan replied in the affirmative.
TAMARAC UTILITIES - WEST
3. Interim Large -User Agreement with Broward County,- Report by City
Attorney - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agreement dated 2/22/80
approved - letter of thanks to be sent to the
County Commission..for their prompt consideration.
Mr. Birken advised that distribution was made to Council of the Interim
Large User Agreement between Broward County and the City of Tamarac,
which was retyped and dated 2/22/80, for the latest revision. It was,
he said, approved by the County Commission on Tuesday, February 26, 1980.
This Agreement provided, he said, for a minimum flow of a half -million
gallons a day, and a maximum of one and a half million gallons a day,
without a penalty; with such penalty being inflicted in excess. He
also noted that there would be a standby charge, which would be paid
whether there is a flow or not.
Mr. Nolan indicated that the amount of 59� is the transmission treatment
disposal charge per thousand.
The City Attorney noted that a marked -up copy was previously given to
Council, and some changes were made; which document was typed by the
County on Friday, February 22, 1980, and then distributed to the County
Commission on Monday morning and afternoon. He advised that no major
changes were made as to what was typed and then approved yesterday.
Mr. Nolan said that the City would pay for a minimum of 500,000 gallons
a day, and would be $104,000.00 a year, which was contemplated in the
rate structure. He said that three pump stations were being spun -off
that pump to the sewage treatment plant, and pumping directly to the
County system, which would be approximately 500,000 gallons of sewerage.
C/W Kelch inquired as to whether adequate rates were being charged;
and felt that everything was covered, and approval could be considered.
V/M Massaro MOVED that the Interim Large User Agreement with Broward
County be approved, as submitted, and dated 2/22/80, and C/M Disraelly
SECONDED.
Mayor Falck advised that he was at the meeting where the numerous changes
were discussed, with review of suggestions on the marked -up copy.
V/M Massaro felt that a letter should be sent to the County Commission,
thanking them for their prompt consideration of this item, to which
Council concurred.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
4. Developers' Agreements for Water and Sewer Connections - Discussion and
possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Held for discussion
at the recessed meeting of 2/29/80.
V/M Massaro said the item is not ready for consideration, and requested
that Council present this on Friday, 2/29/80, at the recessed meeting,
or, if necessary, to be handled at a Special Meeting.
2. Report on Moratorium - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: To be discussed again
at the recessed meeting of 2/29/80.
V/M Massaro felt that action could not be taken at this time on the
lifting of the moratorium, but said that a definite answer could be
ascertained for the next regular meeting of Council.
-11-
2/27/80
mr/
Mr. Gross said that the Consulting Engineer indicated the importance
of the inter -connection being completed prior to the lifting of the
moratorium. Also, it was anticipated that the infiltration work will be
in operation, and consideration could be given to this item for the
next regular meeting of March 12, 1980.
Victor DeSousa of University Housing Corp. stated that they cannot
start any more buildings until the lifting of the moratorium, but does
realize that the City has done everything possible to expedite the
matter. He requested that the City Manager sign the Developer's Agree-
ment, once approved, giving an outside date, as to the delivery of the
connections. This, he said, would enable them to obtain funding for
the buildings, and continue with construction.
V/M Massaro realized that the request was for purposes of financing
the project, but immediate connections were not requiredi only a date.
Mr. Nolan indicated the following verbiage was stated in the contract;
"30 days from notice of issuance, and notice to proceed will not be
issued until such time as the contract is properly executed, and bonding
requirements are satisfactory to the City Attorney". He suggested that
careful examination be made as to the liability involvement of the City,
if completion has not been accomplished within sixty days; which period
of time was suggested by C/M Disraelly.
Mr. Birken felt that an outside date for the lifting of the moratorium
would be a reckless thing to do. But,it could be factual by stating
that the City has "let a contract" , and expect it to be lifted by a
certain date, and what has been done and will be done; with the time
frames involved. He further added that a Developer's Agreement could
contain a clause indicating that the City acknowledges that a moratorium
is in effect, and protection of guaranteed revenues would not commence
until six months after the moratorium has been lifted, rather than six
months from the day of the execution of the agreement. Also, he said,
a motion could be made that upon the lifting of the moratorium, and
receipt by the City of "X" amount of dollars, in contribution charges,
that the moratorium will be automatically lifted. He also said that
Council previously indicated receiving sufficient monies for improvements
that have to be made within one year to 18 months; but the possibility
of the $15,000,000 bonds not having been marketed by that period of time.
Mr.Birken stated that the capital would have to be available, as both
items are tied together.
V/M Massaro said they have already indicated commitment of the "front
money", by putting it in escrow, as noted by Lon Rubin. But, the bank
will not give that money, until a date has been established for the
lifting of the moratorium; which is bank policy.
Mr. Birken said there are factors beyond the control of the City, be-
cause of a catastrophy, or action being taken by a regulatory body.
Mr. DeSousa said that he would bring a check in the following day, if
he could have the agreement signed, which would be for the additional
ERC's. He felt that other developers were involved in this manner.
Mr. Nolan said that there is a legal engineering consideration involved.
Mr. Birken indicated that six weeks previous he sent a memorandum to
Council, with a list of items to be handled prior to the lifting of
the moratorium. He additionally stated that everything has been done,
but the moratorium is not ready to be lifted at this time.
V/M Massaro inquired of the City Attorney if he would be more comfortable
if the date was set after the contracts were "let", and everything has
been signed and sealed, to which Mr. Birken replied in the affirmative.
She further stated that Mr. Birken should be given the opportunity to
review this situation, and requested that this portion of the item be
tabled to the recessed meeting on Friday, February 29, 1980.
Mayor Falck indicated that Item #2, Report on Moratorium, would be the
first item considered at the recessed meeting.
MAYOR FALCK CALLED FOR A FIVE-MINUTE RECESS.
2WZ
2/27/80
mr/
V/M Massaro advised that Montwood Corporation has submitted a check
through the Trust Fund of Mr. Tiballi, the fee of $76,000.00, which
involved payment on the agreement relating to the recreation fees. She
felt that the City was in the position to discuss the planning of the
Community Center for the City.
Mr. Gross stated that the check would be given to the Finance Department,
for handling.
6. Consent Agenda -
a) Minutes of 1/23/80 - Regular Meeting - Approval recommended by
City Clerk.
b) Minutes of 1/25/80 - Reconvened Regular Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
c) Minutes of 2/11/80 -- Special Meeting -- Approval recommended by
City Clerk.
d) Minutes of 2/13/80 - Regular Meeting - Approval recommended by
City Clerk.
e) Alan F. Ruf - Consulting Attorney - 2/22/80 - $1,460.00 - Approval
recommended by City Attorney.
f) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner -- Consulting Engineer - 2/5/80 --
Retainer $100.00 - Approval recommended by City Engineer.
g) Mitchell Ceasar - Grants Consultant - 2/11/80 - $833.33 - Retainer
plus $41.53 Expenses - Total $874.86 - Approval recommended by
Finance Director. (correction made to the total - $874.41)
h) Baker Marine Enterprises - Cypress Creek Commons Construction -
2/11/80 -- $11,000.00 - Approval recommended by City Planner.
i) Apelquist Construction Co. - Fire Station #2 - 2/18/80 -
$12,761.18 - Approval recommended by City Manager.
j) Bid Authorization - Police Department - 16 millimeter roll micro-
film reader -printer - Approval recommended,by City Manager.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) through j) Approved,
with the correction to g) total figure of
$874.41.
C/M Disraelly inquired as to a report by Mitch Ceasar, in writing.Mayor
Falck said that he was instructed at the last Pre -Agenda Workshop
Meeting, to contact Mr. Ceasar, for such report to be in his office
the early part of next month. It would then be determined, he said,
if a personal appearance by Mr. Ceasar was required for the 3/12/80
meeting. The Mayor said a request was made of Mr. Ceasar for additional
input, as relates to the pending grant,also grouting and sewer improve-
ment program.
C/M Disraelly discussed his phone bill, which .involved seven or eight
one (1) minute phone calls. He also stated that there were some calls
made which were not for the City.
V/M Massaro felt that a proper determination should be made for calls
that do not involve the City. She also noted that Mitch Ceasar was
doing a good job, which everyone was not aware of; and that calls were
made on the infiltration work.
Mr. Gross advised that the correct bill which he approved, was $41.08,
Tape which involved a 45� total reduction, and total payment to be made in
Side the amount of $874.41.
#3
C/M Disraelly MOVED that Items a) through d) Minutes, be approved, as
corrected; and Item g) the bill for Mitch Ceasar, be changed to a
total figure of $874.41; with all Consent items to be approved, and
V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
LEGAL
14. Woodmont North Golf Course - Vacation of Covenant - Temp. Reso. #1510 -
D.iscussion and possible action to approve a vacation of covenant for
Parcels R-1 through R-10; and authorizing appropriate City Officials
to execute same.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved RESOLUTION NO.R-- OD"'e3 PASSED.
-13--
2/27/80
mr/
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1510, and advised that this
vacation was partial, for the properties affected by the recent re -
zonings. Also, he stated, there was a new covenant which will be re-
corded, and showing the areas to be covered. Mr. Birken indicated
that the term is the same as the original covenant, with both expiring
at the same time.
C/M Disraelly inquired whether reference was being made to exhibits
showing rezonings from "S-1 to R" designations.
Mr. Birken advised that some property was being rezoned from R to S,
with others from S to R, which was being vacated, in order to be used
for other than golf course purposes, and was provided in Stipulation
#3.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Reso. #1510, and Vice -
Mayor Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Mr. Birken requested that the City Clerk coordinate with Montwood,
as to recordation, along with the covenant, at the same time.
15. Woodmont North Golf Course -- Easement Vacations - Discussion and
possible action to approve 24 vacations of utility easements, each
by separate Resolution Nos. #1522 through #1545.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: All approved, except for
Temp. Reso. #1540, which was rejected and
replaced by Temp. Reso. #1552, dedication of
easement under Item #16.
VOTE:
The City Clerk indicated that E-25 Vacation was being pulled, Temp.
Reso. #1540, and would be replaced by Easement Dedication substitution
under Item #16, Temp. Reso. #1552. She noted that a Vacation was
given, which should have been a Dedication.
Temp._ Reso. #1522
RESOLUTION NO. R- ef)Q - 41 F PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1522, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1523
RESOLUTION NO. R- 40 - PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1523, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its approval, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1524 RESOLUTION NO.R- FQ -6-6 PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1524, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its approval, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1525
RESOLUTION NO.R- A -SS PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1525, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its approval, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1526 RESOLUTION NO.R- p—S,_PASSED.
VOTE:
Te
VOTE:
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1526, and C/W Kelch MOVED
for its approval and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Reso. #1527 RESOLUTION NO. R-- 1%19 -J'"r-3
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1527, and C/W Kelch MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
-14-
2/27/80
mr/
PASSED.
Temp. Reso. #1528
RESOLUTION NO.R-- 66 -S PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1528, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its adoption, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1529
RESOLUTION NO.R- b PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1529, and C/M Wiener MOVED
for its approval,and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1530 RESOLUTION NO.R- Z-4 PASSED.
r+ray V JC
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1530, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its adoption,and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1531
RESOLUTION NO.R- deO-5? PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1531, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1532
RESOLUTION NO.R- ��� PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1532, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its adoption, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1533 RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1533, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1534 RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1534, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its adoption, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1535 RESOLUTION NO.R- 10 4 / PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1535, and C/W Kelch MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE. p�
Temp. Reso. #1536 RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1536, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its adoption, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp-.-Reso. #1537 RESOLUTION NO.R- Q «� �,� PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1537, and C/W Kelch MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
AT,T, VOTED AYR _
-15-
2/27/80
mr/
VOTE:
VOTE:
VOTE:
VOTE:
Temp. Reso. #1538 RESOLUTION NO.R- tO, �04 PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1538, and C/M Wiener MOVED
for its approval,and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1539 RESOLUTION NO.R- �rj�G PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1539, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its adoption, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1540
REJECTED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1540, and C/W Kelch MOVED
that it be rejected, and V/M PZassaro SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1541
RESOLUTION NO.R--b PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1541, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its approval, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1542
RESOLUTION NO.R- 0 PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1542, and C/W I:elch MOVED
for its adoption, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1543
RESOLUTION NO. R-� ' ba PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1543, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1544 RESOLUTION NO.R- (fd^6PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. 41544, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its adoption, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1545
RESOLUTION NO.R- "� b PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1545, and C/W Kelch MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
16. Woodmont North Golf Course - Acceptance of Drainage and Utility
Easements -- Discussion and possible action to accept 10 Grants of
Easements for underground drainage and Utility facilities; each by
separate Resolution Nos. #1.512 through #1521.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Temp. Resos. #1512 through 41521
Approved; Temp. Reso. #1552 Adopted, replacing Temp.
Reso. #1540 (Item 15), plus Temp. Resos. #1553 & #1554
accepting E-35 and E-36.
V/M Massaro inquired whether this item was part of the golf course
with this day's action, and easements being provided.
Fred Tiballi said that nothing here today changes anything from
golf course to residential, which has been done. The properties, he
said, have already been rezoned, with discussion of easement only
this day. He additionally stated that all the easements that were
in the old golf course, and are presently in residential tracts, were
requested to be vacated. Mr. Tiballi said that new easements were
deeded around the perimeter of the new golf course, to coincide
-16-
2/27/80
mr/
with the configurations. Mr. Tiballi noted that E-25 was indicated
to be deeded, and should be vacated, which was substituted and ex-
ecuted for the creation of this easement.
Temp._ Reso. #1512
RESOLUTION NO.R- 10- PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1512, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its approval, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1513
RESOLUTION NO.R- D -34 PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1513, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its adoption, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1514 RESOLUTION NO.R- O O^3 PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1514, and C/W Kelch MOVED
for its approval, and V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1515 RESOLUTION NO.R- cl'0-38 PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1515, and C/M Wiener MOVED
for its adoption, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE. y�
Temp. Reso. #1516 RESOLUTION NO.R- O d PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1516, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1517
RESOLUTION NO. R- A ` '1/6 PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1517, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its adoption, and V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1518 RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
►1101i5C
VOTE:
VOTE:
VOTE:
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1518, and C/W Kelch MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1519
RESOLUTION NO. R- O O ^ 151J-3' PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1519, and C/M Wiener MOVED
for its adoption, and V/M Massaro SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1520
RESOLUTION NO.R- !J (� PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1520, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its adoption, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1521
RESOLUTION NO.R- �� �` 's PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1521, and C/M Wiener MOVED
for its approval, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
AT,T, 170TRT) AVR _
-17-
2/27/80
mr/
r�
L_____j
C/W Kelch MOVED TO AGENDIZE BY CONSENT, under Item #16, Temp. Resos.
#1552, #1553 and #1554, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE. p�
Temp. Reso. #1552 RESOLUTION NO.R- O p �'j�/ PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1552, and C/M Disraelly MOVED
for its adoption, and C/P4 Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1553 RESOLUTION NO.R- �Q��� PASSED.
VOTE:
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1553, and C/M Wiener MOVED
for its approval, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
Temp. Reso. #1554
RESOLUTION NO.R- -fZ PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1554, and C/M Wiener MOVED
for its adoption, and V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
17. Woodmont North Golf Course - Acce tance of Well Field Easements -
Tem . Reso. #1511 - Discussion and possible action to accept 6 Well
Field Easements in Land Sections 4, 5 and 6 by one Resolution.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved RESOLUTION NO.R-- �� -� PASSED.
VOTE:
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1511, and V/M Massaro MOVED
for its adoption, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
MEETING WAS RECESSED TO 1:30 P.M., FOR LUNCH.
MEETING WAS CALLED TO ORDER, ROLL CALL TAKEN, AND C/M DISRAELLY WAS
ABSENT FROM THE DAIS.
PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS
9. National Association of Retired Federal Emplovees Chapter 1698
Presentation of a Proclamation by Mayor Falck declaring the Month
of March as National Association of Retired Federal Employees -
Membership and Public Service Month -- in honor of the recently
Chartered - Chapter #1698.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Presentation made
by Mayor Falck.
Mayor Falck read the Proclamation, which was accepted by Mr.Zweig.
It was noted that C/M Wiener was a member of the group, who stated
there was a need for organization, because many dedicated people
were not recognized, but that everything would be done to help all
retired groups, regardless of affiliation.
There was a request for recognition of Mr. Jack Mailand of Deerfield
Beach, who is the District Leader of Section 6.
7. Distributive Education Clubs of America - DECA - Presentation of a
Proclamation by Mayor Falck declaring the Week of February 24 through
March 1, 1980 as Shopliftinq Prevention Week.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Presentation made
by Mayor Falck.
Mayor Falck read the Proclamation which was requested by a group of
youngsters from Plantation High School, and was accepted by Mindy
Nierenberg and Steve Ploudre, both Seniors at the High School.
-18- 2/27/80
mr/
8. Lions Club - Presentation of a Proclamation by Mayor Falck declaring
the Month of March as Lions Eye Bank Month.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Proclamation recognized
and will e e ivered to proper individual.
Mayor Falck recognized the wonderful accomplishments by the Lions
Club, in the prevention and alleviation of blindness in the Country.
He made reference to the fact that the gentleman who was to accept
this Proclamation, was ill, but delivery would.be made.
10. Employee Service Awards - Presentation of employee Five -Year Pins by
City Manager, Edward A. Gross, to Val Jakolenko - Public Works,
Eugene Letteney - Public Works, and Robert Rippey - Public Works.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Presentations made
by the City Manager.
Mr. Gross presented the Five -Year pins to the Public Works gentlemen,
Tape and praised the excellent response to problems within the City, and
Side the tremendous efforts extended. He indicated that Mr. Letteney was
#4 considered the number two member of the department, and, has, on ocas-
sion, taken over as Acting Public Works Director. He additionally stated
that Val Jakolenko is a representative of the union, for the "blue collar
workers", working for the betterment of the City of Tamarac.
FIVE-MINUTE RECESS CALLED BY MAYOR FALCK.....
PUBLIC HEARINGS
11. Site Plan Procedures - Temp. Ord. #725 - Amending Code Section 7-10
by permitting a single family subdivision developer to submit only a
final site plan to Planning Commission and only final plats on indi-
vidually platted lots. Discussion and possible action. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd ORDINANCE NO.0- �� ` PASSED.
and final reading.
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #725.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public, and closed it because
there were no public comments received.
C/M Disraelly said that he addressed a communication to the City Attorney
last week, which related to fees associated with the preliminary site
plan.
Mr. Birken advised that an ordinance was prepared modifying Section
7-8.4, which was copied for C/M Disraelly, due to receipt of his memo,
and will be distributed to Council.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Ord. #725, on second and
final reading, and V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
ComTamarac Utilities West Tem Ord #
prehensive Regulations
Relating to rates, service, new development, etc. Discussion and pos-
sible action - Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to recessed meeting
of 2 29 80, for review of Section 20.
Mayor Falck advised that as a result of the Workshop Meeting, a deter-
mination was made for the elimination of the rate schedules, to which
the City Attorney replied that, by memorandums, the City Council became
aware of possible changes, and the drafting of resolutions for the rate
schedules.
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #726.
V/M Massaro indicated her objections to the requirement for a hearing,
and felt it would create problems in the City, and would not recommend
approval of the ordinance at this time.
Mr. Gross advised that there were objections administratively, as to
requirements for a hearing, due to the 12,000 customers to be handled,
2/27/80
-19- mr/
J
with approximately 150 hearings per month. This, he said, would involve
additional personnel being hired in the Finance Department, which, in
turn, would create a larger amount of paperwork to be handled. lie also
stated that after lengthy discussion with Mr. Hoyt, he concurred with
the strong objections that were indicated, and related to Section 20
of the ordinance.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public.
Milt Klika felt that if that area of the ordinance was not mandatory,
then it could be stricken; which was a method for the collection of
delinquent payments.
Mr. Birken advised that this ordinance relates to everything pertaining
to water and sewer in the City, with the rates possibly being taken out
of the ordinance, which may be adopted by resolution. This, he said,
might occur today, if Council enacts the ordinance, with the proposed
amendments. He also stated that basic rates were not proposed to be
changed, but particular questions may be raised, as relates to deposits.
Milt Klika inquired as to the City water being used for watering the
lawn, which involves increased sewer charges, and the method for re-
solving this.
V/M Massaro responded that a separate meter could be installed to make
a provision for potable water used for lawn sprinkling.
Mayor Falck said there was an understanding that the rate portion would
not be included in the ordinance. He also indicated that the City
Attorney drafted two resolutions, Temp. Resos. #1550 and #1551, which
action will be considered at another time.
Carl Alper said that the State Legislature proposed a method of obtaining
assistance for the City Council, in the operation of a utility. He felt
that the Florida Public Works Law, Section 180.13, authorizes the City
Council to create a separate board or to appoint a City Official for
instituting rules and regulations, which would govern the use, control
and operation of the utility. lie additionally stated that the board
could be advisory, but would assist the Council in their work -load.
It was his suggestion that the City prohibit the digging of wells in
private property, which involves the waste of large quantities of un-
metered water. Also, he felt that ordinances should be presented to
the Code Advisory Board prior to approval of the Code supplements.
He additionally felt that the people should be made aware of problems
in the City, as to the utility.
Mayor Falck closed the discussion to the public, because there were no
further comments received.
V/M Massaro said that due to the discussion which involved non-payment
requirements, she MOVED that the item be tabled to the Friday recessed
meeting of February 29, 1980, in order for the City Attorney to review
this.
Mr. Gross advised that in order to computerize the 10% penalty area,
it would require a delay of 120 days to get it into the billing process.
C/M Disraelly SECONDED the motion.
C/W Kelch requested information on Section 20, prior to the 2/29/80
reconvened meeting.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
13. Administrative Refund of Fees - Temp. Ord. #727 -- Discussion and pos-
sible action to amend Code Section 2-3 by permitting the City Manager to
administratively refund certain fees collected. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd and ORDINANCE NO.O- &A r,3, _PASSED.
final reading.
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #727.
Mayor Falck advised that a specific provision has been included that
administrative refunds will not exceed $50.00.
=4410
2/27/80
mr/
J
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public, and closed it because
there were no comments received.
C/M Disraelly said that the refund of fees, especially in recreation
areas, should be permitted, and MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Ord.
#727, on second and final reading, and C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
19. Tamarac Shopping Plaza - Liti ation -- Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Site Plan extended to 3/26/80;
with developer to be notified to appear prior to
that date on remaining list of items to be resolved.
Mr. Birken indicated that his memo was distributed to Council this
morning, and requested that Council extend the site plan to the first
meeting in March: At that time, he said, something will be submitted,
in writing,for an overall solution, and Council's consideration.
C/M Disraelly MOVED to extend the site plan until 3/26/80, and Vice -Mayor
Massaro SECONDED.
C/W Kelch felt that she would never go along with the drainage, and the
extension of time.
V/M Massaro WITHDREW HER SECOND to the motion, because she felt addi-
tional discussion and objections should be heard prior to the 3/26/80
meeting.
C/M Disraelly confirmed the fact that the City Attorney requested the
extension because of the expiration of the site plan, which would require
being brought back to the Planning Commission, and starting over.
Mr. Birken said two motions would be required; one to extend the site
plan, and the second motion for tabling.
C/W Kelch felt that the extension was requested by the Shopping Plaza,
which was for a lengthy period of time, especially since nothing has
been done to augment suggestions that were made. Also, she said, the
drainage bonding had nothing to do with the situation, and should be
deleted from the agreement, and considered on a separate basis.
Mr. Birken indicated that the time request was one year from July 1980.
He further stated that they were attempting to get a movie theatre in
as a tenant, which would require additional parking, and was necessary
to handle as quickly as possible.
V/M Massaro said that one site plan expires in July of 1980, and they
were interested in bringing them together, due to many problems involved
in the area. She did agree that the bond could not be released for
drainage, unless it refers back to its creation, due to pipes being
placed without an easement. She additionally stated that it is the
responsibility of Tamarac Shopping Plaza management to resolve the prob-
lems, prior to release of the bond.
C/W Kelch said that she would not object to an extension for one month,
on the site plan, if assurance was made that a solution could be resolved.
C/M Disraelly stated that he has seen many letters which were received
from their attorneys, but would anticipate that these attorneys would be
in attendance at the next meeting, in order to resolve the situation.
Tape He REPEATED THE MOTION, that in order for the site plan not to expire,
Side that it be extended to 3/26/80; also, that the applicant be notified to
#5 appear at some meeting, prior to that date, to discuss the different
items on their list. V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
20. Sign Ordinance - Temp. Ord. #670 - Discussion and possible action to
adopt a new comprehensive sign ordinance. Second Reading. (Public
Hearing was held in December 1979).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd and
final reading, as revised.
-21-
ORDINANCE NO.0- d O - 31/ PASSED.
2/27/80
mr/
C/M Disraelly advised that since the public hearing, meetings have been
held with the Chamber of Commerce, with the determination to establish
Bill Sutter, as the liaison person of the retail division. C/M Disraelly
referred to his memorandum of 2/7/80, which was submitted to Council, as
to changes to be made, and the amendments to the ordinance, that were
reviewed with Mr. Sutter. Additionally, he said, that a letter was re-
ceived from Barry Eden, where an inquiry was made as to a logo being a
trademark for the United States Government or the State of Florida, and
once registered, whether it would be permitted.
He was not in agreement with such permission, because it would allow
any size, shape or color to be used. He also noted that Mr. Sutter
advised that the Chamber of Commerce was satisfied with the new ordi-
nance, as amended.
V/M Massaro inquired whether renewal fees were eliminated, to which
C/M Disraelly responded that all the annual renewal fees were deleted,
and referred to page 10, line 7, being included in his memorandum,
with the following new Section IV: Permit Fees -"Prior to the issuance
of a permit, the Chief Building Official of the City shall collect for
each sign permitted a fee as established by resolution of the City Council.
There shall be fees for permanent signs, for temporary signs, and for
relocation of existing signs.
The City Council may establish by resolution a minimum charge for the
issuance of permits and may set extra charges for electrical permits or
other extraordinary permits.
The City Council may establish by resolution a renewal fee for signs,
which fee shall cover the necessary cost of reinspection as required by
the. South Florida Building Code. Failure to pay the required renewal
fee, if any, within thirty (30) days shall incur an additional charge
of five (5%) percent of the renewal fee and failure to pay any required
fee within sixty (60) days will incur a penalty charge of ten (10%)
percent of the renewal fee. Failure to pay any required renewal fee
within ninety (90) days shall constitute a violation of this ordinance.
The Chief Building Official shall keep a card file inventory of all
permits, including a photo of each sign for ready reference."
C/M Disraelly also noted an amendment to page 8, line 27, Item 10, which
shall be amended to read; "Logos of individual stores or businesses,in
shopping complexes and free standing buildings, are permitted, provided
they conform with the established color and size criteria of the shopping
complex". He stated that this paragraph was inserted at the request of
the Ad Hoc Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, whereby logos were not
permitted, except for free --standing buildings, but are now permitted
provided they conform to size and color, and the logo is not larger than
any individual letter in the shopping complex.
C/M Disraelly indicated, for the record, that the following addenda has
been made; page 3, line 10 - add "located on premises"; page ll,line 4 -
the word informational has been changed to "directional"; line 6, Item
7 - shall now read "window signs of paper and/or fabric on the interior
or exterior of the window, in business zoning districts, provided that
such signs shall not cover in excess of fifty (500) percent", with the
balance of the paragraph remaining the same.
He said that on line 30, the word "describes" was misspelled; page 13,
line 24 - 60 inches was changed to "72 inches"; line 26 - add the sentence
"location sketch must accompany application"; page 15, line 29 - numeral
4 square feet has been changed to 6 square feet; page 16, line 21 -
the following verbiage is to be deleted "The sign must conform, etc.
through line 24, used for visibility"; page 17, line 9 - the word "and"
is to be stricken; page 17, line 22 - add at the end of the paragraph
"Vacant land for sale signs in excess of 16 square feet shall require a
permit. Maximum allowable size of sign for vacant land shall be 32
square feet".
C/M Disraelly further stated that page 18, line 1 - changed to read "may
be displayed only during and up to seven (7) days prior to a special
event to which it relates. Must be removed within 72 hours after the
event"; Line 10, page 18 - Item 3 shall read "may be displayed up to
thirty (3) days prior and up to seven (7) days after a recognized holiday",
with the balance remaining the same; line 13 - amended to read "Two (2)
-22-
2/27/80
mr/
special events for commercial sale activities in addition to recognized
holidays shall be permitted each calendar year, provided the event is
for the entire shopping complex. Maximum time for display shall be
one (1) week"; page 25, line 12 -- change thirty (30) days to "sixty (60)
days"; line 27 1/2 - under Section X - Non -Conforming Signs, a sentence
was omitted; "Within ten (10) years of the date of adoption of this
ordinance, or", with the balance remaining the same.
C/M Disraelly stated that page 26, line 1 - verbiage should read: "is
being conducted, shall be allowed to remain" with insertion in paren-
thesis"(for a maximum of ten (10) years)"- balance to remain; line 4 -
after the first word, sign, the period is to be removed, with the follow-
ing verbiage to be inserted "whichever comes first"; line 33 - after the
word alteration, a comma is to be inserted, also adding "relocation";
page 28, line 13 - 30 working days is to be changed to 1160"; page 29,
line 2 - a new sentence will read "All fees established by resolution
under authority of this ordinance are hereby ratified and are not re-
pealed by the enactment of this ordinance".
C/M Disraelly THEN MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Ord. #670, as
revised 12/19/79, for second and final reading, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Bill Sutter thanked the Mayor and Council for listening to their comments;
and Ray Baade was commended for his assistance, by C/M Disraelly.
21. Sign Permit Fees - Temp.._Reso. #1489 - Discussion and possible action
to adopt fees for sign permits, pursuant to Temp. Ord. #670.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted, as RESOLUTION NO.R- fO " �! PASSED.
amended.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1489.
C/M Disraelly advised that the ordinance was changed to establish fees
by resolution; and noted that Section 1 include; "The following non-
refundable fees for sign permits and renewal fees, are hereby established"
with permanent signs being $1.00 per square foot for the first 25 square
fee and 5V per square foot for the remainder of the total sign area;
temporary signs - 75� per square foot of the total sign area; minimum
charge for the issuance of any permit shall be $15.00; electrical permit
fee has not been changed; paragraph 7 should be totally removed, because
a .renewal fee will not be charged at this time, until additional input
has been received from the Chief Building Official.
V/M Massaro additionally noted a deletion on lines 6 and 7, "and renewal
permits", in SECTION 1. She also felt that all fees should be changed;
due to increases in wages in the City Hall for all employees. She
suggested that the second portion of Item 1, should be 60G instead of
50� per square foot; with Item 2, Temporary Signs being changed from
754 per square foot, to $1.00.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Reso. #1489, with line 9
to be changed to $1.00, and line 10 to be $.60; line 12, to be $1.00;
line 14, to be $15.00, and line 16, to be $15.00. C/W Kelch SECONDED
the motion. He further stated that Item 7 is to be removed, with the
words "and renewal permits" to be stricken in lines 6 and 7. C/W Kelch
concurred.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
C/M Disraelly indicated that four week previous, the Beautification
Committee approved the sign for Lindsley Lumber, but there has been
no response since that time.
Mr. Gross indicated that it was structurally safe, but was not so pre-
viously.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
26. Isles of Tamarac - New Model/Sales Complex - Discussion and possible
action on the recently constructed model/sales complex.
-23-
2/27/80
mr/
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Amended site plan approved,
subject to payment of fees and compliance with
ordinances.
Gary Glusman indicated that discussion was held at a previous meeting,
relating to their recently constructed model/sales; with action to be
taken at a later date, after review.
C/M Disraelly stated that after review of the minutes, he noted that
reference was made to the fence, and not the model/sales.
V/M Massaro inquired about the submission of letters from people whose
homes border on the model/sales area, for the 2/29/80 recessed meeting;
in order for the Engineering Department to determine the fees involved.
She further stated that it was necessary for these people to indicate
that they do not object to the model/sales office -area.
Mr. Glusman said that the area was fenced -off and was confined, and
has not received any complaints from the neighboring homes. Fie ad-
vised that Lot 52 - was not sold; Lot 55 - was sold, but the people live
in New York; Lot 47 and Lot 46 - were homes on the opposite street, and
were sold.
V/M Massaro felt that it was too late to obtain waivers, and MOVED that
this amended site plan be approved, subject to payment of appropriate
fees; and compliance with all ordinances, without selling Lot 52, and
C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
27. Sign Waiver Request- Gloria and Maggie's Dog Beauty - Temp. Reso.
#1546 - Discussion and possible action on request for waiver of the
sign ordinance to permit one additional sign for this business on the
north side of the property. (6660 N.W. 57th St. -- Financial Federal
Plaza) .
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved RESOLUTION NO.RI OA -3 D PASSED.
402
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1546.
C/M Disraelly advised that this item was brought before the Beautifica-
tion Committee, and involved the Financial Federal Plaza on 57th Street,
with the rear of the building facing Commercial Boulevard. He said
there is a sign on 57th Street, which reads "Dog Grooming", but this
is not visible. He further added that a request for a sign was made,
"Gloria and Maggie's Dog Grooming"; which was denied by the Beautifica-
tion Committee, because it was to be located on the rear of the property,
and was not in compliance with the Sign Ordinance.
C/M Disraelly did state that this is one area where Council has the
authority to approve exceptions; which the Beautification Committee
did concur. He MOVED for the approval of the waiver, and V/M Massaro
SECONDED, but felt that they must adhere to the criteria which has been
established.
Mayor Falck was advised that the permit was pulled, and the fee was paid.
VOTE:, ALL VOTED AYE.
LEGAL
18. Wedgewood - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Progress of outstanding matters of concern.
b) Road Dedications - Temp. Reso. #1075.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) Authorization to release C.O.s,
with conditions; b) Approved, with responsi-- RESOLUTION NO.R- PASSED.
bility to Chateau Associates for payment of
taxes imposed prior to agreement signing.
a) Mr. Birken stated that a motion was made at the previous Council
meeting, which would permit the issuance of up -to four Certificates
of Occupancy, after building criteria was satisfied; including a
-24- 2/27/80
mr/
IL
$10,000.00 cash bond has been posted, guaranteeing that outstanding work
will be accomplished. He further stated that interest rates have been
rising rapidly, and the developer has been put on notice by the bank
that is financing all the units to be C.O.'d, as to the effective rate
at that period of time. It was noted that interest rates would be
raised at the end of this week. Mr. Birken said the question before
Council was whether the people will be protected with the $10,000.00
cash bond, which is in excess of the amount required for the repair work,
and whether Council will permit five C.O.s to be issued.
It was the recommendation of the City Attorney that such permission be
granted, indicating that the City's interest will be protected, but
felt that the $10,000.00 cash bond should be received prior to such
action.
V/M Massaro anticipated that the agreement would be completed this
afternoon, and felt that it was necessary to protect the people who are
purchasing these homes, due to the tremendous increase in interest rates.
She concurred with the $10,000.00 cash bond, because the problems were
enumerated in the contract, also, the areas discussed by C/M Disraelly
were included. She also noted that problem areas that were viewed by
her and also the City Engineer, were incorporated. The Vice -Mayor
additionally stated that a guardrail should be placed between Phase 1
and 2, because the wood -rail is not safe.
C/M Disraelly concurred that it be put into the motion, but felt that the
site plan so indicated this, and it involved an ordinance, as to its
construction. He discussed driveway and catch -basin problems at 32A.
V/M Massaro also stated there were problems with the sprinkler system,
and indicated that nothing should be added to the list, after this day's
meeting. She added that some retention of water is required, but
mosquito breeding places are health hazards.
Tape Mrs. Monheit stated that she was one of the prospective buyers, and
Side indicated that the American Savings Bank raised their interest rate,
#6 which is presently 13%, from 11 1/2%.
V/M Massaro advised that the contour elevation has been struck, with
one catch basin in the island, and the valley gutters would be going
in four directions; which will be north, south, east and west. She
additionally stated that the City Engineer felt this would adequately
accommodate the area.
Bernard Miller inquired as to whether the $10,000.00 cash bond was
adequate; also David Felsenstein indicated that he was sympathetic
with those persons waiting to take title.
V/M Massaro and Mayor Falck did state that the $10,000.00 cash bond
was adequate, which was confirmed by the City Attorney and the City
Engineer. It was also noted by Council that a time limit will be
included in the agreement, which the City would monitor for a thirty
(30) day completion date.
V/M Massaro MOVED that subject to a signed agreement by the appropriate
City official, and Mr. Hahn, or an appropriate person in his association;
with a time limit for completion of the work by Chateau Associates, Ltd.,
which period of time will be not more than 30 days, after which time the
City would be empowered to use the money, and complete the listed work
in the agreement. That Mr. Hahn of Chateau Associates, Ltd., or whoever
is responsible, be required to remove the wood -guardrails, according to
the original agreement, and the guardrail be installed in compliance with
the Code. She also noted that it was subject to the payment of the
$10,000.00 cash bond.
The City Attorney suggested inclusion in the MOTION, such as the form
of the documents being satisfactory to the City Attorney, also, that
any other provisions which may protect the interest of the people and
the City, may be inserted in the agreement, to which the Vice -Mayor
concurred.
Milton Hausen inquired as to the method for instituting additions to
their building, to which the Vice -Mayor advised that the Association
Attorney will direct them, as relates to their Condominium Document.
--25-
2/27/80
mr/
C/W Kelch SECONDED the motion.
V/M Massaro ADDED TO THE MOTION, by stating that at the time of the
signing of the agreement by both parties, the Chief Building Official
is authorized to release all five (5) building C.O.s, with no release
of the $10,000.00 cash bond, until such time as the City Engineer approves
this, and thereafter,the City Council.
C/W Kelch concurred with the additional verbiage.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
b) Road Dedications - Temp. Reso. #1075 (Held for later)
C/M Disraelly inquired about repairs to the road, to which the Vice -
Mayor indicated there was one patch which was necessary to be handled
by the utility.
V/M Massaro said that some areas required work being done in the roads,
in grading, to avoid ponding. She additionally stated that it was
omitted, because the intention was to repair the sprinkler systems prior
to the signing of the agreement. She AMENDED HER MOTION to state that
the sprinkler systems have to be operative, prior to the release of
the $10,000.00 cash bond.
V/M Massaro MOVED to RECONSIDER THE ITEM ON WEDGEWOOD, and C/W Kelch
SECONDED. She said there were problems at the triangle area for the
sprinkler system, and was aware that many sections were not functioning,
and included in her MOTION that all sprinkler systems must be operative
before the release of the cash bond. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
b) Road Dedications - Temp. Reso. #1075
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1075.
V/M Massaro inquired about the money requirement for the first year's
electric, to which the City Attorney noted that it was spelled -out, and
did not have to be included in the acceptance of the roads.
C/M Disraelly said that the developer was required to pay the first
twelve months of operation; which was determined after review with
Larry Atkinson of F.P.& L. recently. He was advised by Mr. Atkinson
that the contract for the installation of the poles has been let, and
should be completed by April 1, 1980.
V/M Massaro MOVED for acceptance of the Road Dedication and improvements
in Wedgewood, known as Chateau Associates, Ltd.; also, that it be demon-
strated that taxes have been paid for bills rendered, and assume the
responsibility for taxes up -to -the date of the signing of this agree-
ment, as per Temp. Reso. #1075. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
22. Recreation Land Dedication - Temp. _Ord. #622 -- Providing for Council
prerogative for dedication of land or submission of money for new resi-
dential developments. Discussion and possible action - Second Reading.
(Public Hearing held July 1979).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Rejected
V/M Massaro MOVED that the item be rejected on second reading, and
C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
28. Woodmont - Tract 49 - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan
b) Plat - Temp. Reso. #1547
c) Developers' Agreement
-26- 2/27/80
mr/
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) Approved, with conditions;
b) Approved, as amended, and c)Reconsideration - RESOLUTION NO.R- Q PASSED.
recessed meeting of Friday, 2/29/80.
a)Mr. Gene Toll discussed areas of the site plan, and noted that
the non -vehicular access easement would be bermed.
Mr. Keating, the City Engineer, advised that the engineering fee was
$20,617.00, with the cost of improvements being $281,000.00. He also
stated that an arrangement was made for the approval of the drainage
design, after discussions with Mr. Epple, and review of the City's
Ordinance. He additionally said there were some items which referred
to the Department of Transportation standards, without specific indica-
tion; also, using the City's standard format for submission of calcula-
tions, which has not been considered in other categories. Mr. Keating
further indicated a response has been attempted,as to use, because of
conservative design criteria in the Code. But, he felt this project
should go -forward, and would attempt to answer other questions in the
near future, for clarification of the ordinance.
Tape Mr. Keating said a 30 foot right-of-way for limited service for design
Side purposes,would be -serving 25 dwelling units or less. This, he said,
#7 was a small street, with limited traffic.
C/M Disraelly confirmed the fact that there were 25 homes permitted in
the cul-de-sac; with 23 homes in the interior being designated.
Mr. Keating indicated that he was satisfied with the site plan and
the drainage involved.
C/M Disraelly MOVED to accept the site plan for Tract 49 -- Woodmont,
with all buildings to be as shown, no "flip-flops", garages, and
berming on non -vehicular access easement. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
Mr. Keating felt that approval should be given, on minor notations,
which should be added to the engineering drawing; such as changing
the invert elevation from manhole 50 to manhole 13. As related to
the above, the Vice -Mayor requested that the engineering plan be so
marked.
Mr. Birken indicated that there was no water and sewer involved, and
felt that the MOTION should include a statement that all Development
Review Requirements have been satisfied outside of water and sewer having
been satisfied. He further stated that the water and sewer should
be handled subject to the lifting of the moratorium, or permit C.O.s
to be pulled, which were the two options involved.
Mr. Fred Tiballi said they were in a position to sign the water and
sewer ERC Developer Agreements for the other tracts, and did have
checks in his possession. At the time of approval of the Developers'
Agreements, and some minor changes inserted, which he discussed with
Mr. Birken, they would sign and give the City checks for this tract,
as well as others.
C/W Kelch and C/M Disraelly CONCURRED WITH THE INCLUSION OF THE
VERBIAGE, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, RELATING TO DEVELOPERS'
AGREEMENTS, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS BEING SATISFIED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
C/M Disraelly indicated deletion of fours and fives at the bottom of
the sheet, because it was not being used. 6 1/2 and 7 1/2 was in
use, which computation would be incorrect, if left "as is", he noted.
b)The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1547.
C/M Disraelly inquired about a sign easement being shown on the south-
east corner, which was brought to Mr. Toll's attention at the Planning
Commission meeting. He said that it was shown on the site plan, to
which Mr. Toll replied that a sign easement was not required, because
it was common area.
Mr. Birken also said that the Development Review Requirements of the
Broward County Land Use Plan, with the exception of water and sewer,
appear to be satisfied, which water and sewer shall be resolved by'a
-27-
2/27/80
mr/
separate Developers'
of the moratorium.
said.
Agreement, which will be effective upon the lifting
Such verbiage shall be included in Section 3, he
V/M Massaro said the site plan could be marked to remove easement for
the sign.
V/M Massaro MOVED that the plat for the Woodmont - Tract 49, in Temp.
Reso. #1547, as amended, be approved. C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
c)Mr. Birken advised that the Developers' Agreement has not been prepared,
which was similar to the form used for water and sewer, with some minor
changes. Fie was assured by Mr. Tiballi that it would be executed to-
morrow.
Mr. Tiballi presented copies of the Developers' Agreement for Tract 49,
and said that there were modifications, namely, if there were variations
in the site plan, the City has the right to cancel the Developers' Agree-
ment. It was changed, he said, to provide for variation increasing
ERC's as shown on the site plan; that a new agreement would be necessary.
Mr. Toll indicated that there were 63 units, consisting of single-family
homes, the clubhouse and swimming pool. He additionally stated that
recreation has to be added, and would be pleased to give a check for
the extras, and have it recalculated.
V/M Massaro said the check for the 63 units could be given now, and
on Friday, February 29, 1980, it would be recalculated for the other
ERC's, the recreation building and pool. She further stated that
Council will wait for Friday, to accept the checks.
Mayor Falck indicated that action will be considered on Friday, 2/29/80,
at 10:30 A.M.
LEGAL
23. Consultants' Cop etitive Negotiations Act - Temp. Reso. #1509 - Dis-
cussion and possible action to urge the Broward Legislative Delegation
to sponsor an amendment to this act by permitting governmental agencies
more flexibility in retaining consultants.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted RESOLUTION NO.R- Q -oZ PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1509.
Mayor Falck said that Tony Nolan spoke with him, and felt that he would
like the opportunity of reading this resolution, and then discuss it.
VOTE:
V/M Massaro felt that action should be taken, otherwise, the professional
people would benefit, and not the City. She MOVED that Temp. Reso.
#1509 be approved, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
24. Employment Agreement - Police Department and Fire Department - Discussion
and possible action to approve a form agreement whereby Police and Fire
Officers, whose training is paid by the City, would reimburse the City
if they terminate employment within 2 years.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to 3/12/80,
to permit forms to be rewritten.
Mr. Gross advised that substantial sums of money were required in the
training of policemen and firemen; with approximately $5600.00 for the
police, and half of that amount for the firemen. He felt that a formal
agreement should be instituted, in order to provide for a minimum period
of employment, after the training period, or a penalty would be involved.
After discussion with the City Attorney, Mr. Gross said it was determined
to lower the unexpired term cost per day, from $10 to $5-for each day.
V/M Massaro presented a motion to approve this, which was then determined
to be rewritten and amended. She then MOVED to amend the form, and
have it brought back to Council at the 3/12/80 meeting, and C/M Disraelly
SECONDED.
-2€3- 2/27/80
mr/
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE.
25. Broward County_- Rezoning - Discussion and possible action on request
by residents of Bermuda Club for assistance to deny rezoning of North
Lot 3, Land Section 11-49-41 by Broward County from residential to
industrial.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: No action taken, but
Council will support Bermuda Club objection
to rezoning at County level.
V/M Massaro advised that this parcel of land was in the County, on the
other side of Bailey Road. She further added that if the land section
was to be divided in -half, the northern half involves the industrial
land, which is north of Bermuda Club, and east of the Courtyards.
Evan Cross said the area was between Shaker Village and Bermuda Club,
on the south side, when McNab Road is cut through, 1/2 track north
in the unincorporated area.
Tape Mr. Gross felt this could not be changed, but would be heard by the
Side Broward County Planning Council on Thursday, Febuuary 28, 1980. He
#8 explained that the Courtyards were condominiums, who were in favor of
this rezoning, in order to increase the population in North Lauderdale.
V/M Massaro said there was a request made for Council to discuss this
item, and voice the objection of Bermuda Club, for this rezoning, to
which Mayor Falck indicated that he would be in attendance at the
Planning 60uncil meeting, and present this. V/M Massaro read a letter
that was received from the Bermuda Club. Management Council, which was
addressed to Commissioner Forman, and was noted to be located on the
land adjacent to the Star of David Cemetery, between Bailey Road and
McNab Road.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
29. Fire Department - Pum er Fire Truck - Discussion and possible action
relating to the financial arrangements for payment of the pumper truck,
for the bid awarded at the February 25, 1980 Special Meeting. Temp.
Reso. #1555.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved
RESOLUTION NO. R- PASSED.
Mr. Birken said that this was essentially the same resolution, which
was previously prepared and reviewed, but the backup involved the Cable
TV Franchise, and the excess unpledged monies in the telephone franchise,
and related to approximately $7,000 or $8,000 of unpledged monies.
He also stated that the bank's attorney has reviewed the resolution and
the other documents, and has informed him that everything appeared to
be in order. Also, that the figures will be included at the time of
closing, which was a loan at 7.350, with the Century National Bank.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1555.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Reso. #1555, providing
for the issuance of the note, in the amount of $87,000.00, with the
amounts for the installment of 15 consecutive quarters, to be inserted
no later than the signing of the note. Also, that the proper City
Officials be authorized to sign such note, at the rate of 7.35% per
annum. C/M Wiener SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
30. Florida Department of Law Enforcement Agreement - Temp. Reso. #1548 -
Discussion and possible action to approve an agreement for use of a
communications terminal for criminal justice information.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted RESOLUTION NO.R- fD-�PASSED.
The City Atorney read Temp. Reso. #1548.
Mr. Gross explained that with this equipment, using an individual's
social security number, license plate number, or name, there would be
--29- 2/27/80
mr/
J
a read -back from the computer, as to ownership, criminal involvement,
etc. He further stated that such equipment was used by Police Depart-
ments in Florida, and would be of tremendous assistance, plus being a
safety factor for the patrolman, with a hook-up to every Police Depart-
ment in the State. Mr. Gross advised that the electrical cost was the
only item involved, and this item was being presented for renewal of
the equipment, which was determined very valuable.
V/M Massaro MOVED for the approval of Temp. Reso. #1548, and C/W Kelch
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
MEETING WAS RECESSED TO 7:00 P.M. TODAY.
ATTEST:
CITY,CLE K
This public document was promulgated at a cost of $ 70 , or $ •%g
per copy, to inform the general public and public officers and employees
about recent opinions and considerations by the City Council of the City of
Tamarac.
VIOL
2/27/80
mr/