HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980-05-14 - City Commission Regular Meeting MinutesP. O. BOX 25010
TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33320
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, MAY 14, 1980
CALL TO ORDER: 9:30 A.M.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF TIME ALLOCATIONS - MOTIONS TO TABLE - The Chair
at this time, will announce those items which have been given a
specific time to be heard, and will entertain motions from
Council members to table those items which require additional
research. Council may agendize by majority consent, matters of
an urgent nature which have come to Council's attention after
publication of this agenda.
TAMARAC UTILITIES - WEST
1. Operations - Status Report - Discussion and possible action.
2. Developers'_ A reements - Discussion and possible action.
PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS.
3. Tamarac Elementary School -- Student Awards - Presentation
to student winner of Contest jointly sponsored by the City
and Summit Bank for design of the cover of the Summer Rec-
reation Brochure.
4. City Photoaraa hX Contest - Presentation to five (5) winners
of the City's Photography Contest.
5. American Legion - Presentation by Mayor Falck of Proclama-
tion declaring May 23rd and 24th as Poppy Days in Tamarac.
6. Senior Industries - Presentation to the City of a replica
of the recreation playground in appreciation of the City's
cooperation extended to Senior Industries.
7. Broward Center for the Blind - Presentation by Sheila Johns,
Executive Director, of the activities and objectives of this
organization.
BOARDS AND COMMITTEES - Appointments
8. Planning Commission -- Temp. Reso. #1609 -- Discussion and
possible action to appoint three (3) regular and up to five
(5) alternate members.
9. Beautification Committee - Temp. Reso. #1608 - Discussion
and possible action to appoint five(5)regular and up to
three (3) alternate members.
FIRST CLASS
MAIL
I(5/14-pgs.2,3)
(5/14-pg•3)
(5/14-pg.3)
( 5/14--pg. 4 )
(5/14-pg.4)
(5/14-pg.4)
(5/14-pgs.6,7,
9)
RESO.80-120
( 5/14--pg. 9 )
RESO.80--119
PAnp Twn _
10.
Board of Consumer Affairs -- Temp. Reso. #1606 - Discussion
(5/14-pg.9)
and possible action to appoint twelve (12) regular members.
RESO.80-117
11.
Public Information Committee - Temp. Reso. #1611 -- Discus-
(5/14-pg.10)
sion and possible action to appoint five (5) members.
ESO.80-118
12.
Board of Social Services - Temp. Reso. #1612 - Discussion
(5/14-pg.10)
and possible action to appoint three (3) members.
ESO.80-121
13.
Advisory Study Commission - Temp. Reso. #1607 -- Discus--(5/19-pg-5)
_Code
sion and possible action to appoint five (5) regular members
ESO.80-131
14.
Recreation Board - Tem Reso. #1613 - Discussion and pos-
(5/14--pg.1)
sible action to appoint at least five (5) members.
TBLD.to 5/28
15.
Citizens Advisory Committee to the Community Development
(5/19-Pg.5)
ESO.80-130
Block Grant Program -- Temp. Reso. #1605�- Discussion and
possible action to appoint at least three (3) members.
16.
Consent Agenda - Items listed under Item #16, Consent Agenda(5/14-pg.5)
are viewed to be routine and the recommendation will be en-
(5/21-pg•1)
acted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be
no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is de -a)
- e) Appd.
sired, then the item(s) will be removed from the Consent
as corrected.
Agenda and will be considered separately,
- j), nand
) -Appd
a) Minutes of 3/31/80 - Reconvened Regular Meeting -
Approval recommended by City Clerk.
) - Tabled
& m) Appd.
b) Minutes of 4/4/80 - Special Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
c) Minutes of 4/9/80 - Regular Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
d) Minutes of 4/23/80 - Regular Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
e) Minutes of 4/14/80 -- Reconvened Regular Meeting - Ap-
proval recommended by City Clerk.
f) Alan F. Ruf - Consulting Attorney - 5/9/80 - $1,200.00
Approval recommended by City Attorney.
g) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer -
4/3/80 - $1,185.75 - Account #425--368-535-310 - Appro
recommended by City Engineer.
h) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer -
4/3/80 - $833.38 - Account #428-371-535-552 - Approval
recommended by City Engineer.
i) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner -- Consulting Engineer -
4/4/80 - $4,377.35 - Account #429-371-535-622 -- Approval
recommended by City Engineer.
j) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer --
4/8/80 - $5,560.25 - Account #350-500-531; $195.00 --
Account #1-155-515-310 - total $5,755.25 - Approval
recommended by City Engineer.
k) Bid Authorization -- Parking lot lights for City facili-
ties - Approval recommended by City Manager.
1) Bid Authorization - City Hall roof repairs - Approval
recommended by City Manager.
m) Bid Authorization - Roadway Resurfacing -- Approval
recommended by City Manager.
n) Bid Authorization - Police Department telephone/dispa
security tape system - Approval recommended by City
Manager.
PAGE THREE.
o) occupational License Fee - Refund -- to Louis B. Fisher
Real Estate - for auctioneer fee erroneously charged --
Approval recommended by City Attorney and City Clerk.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
(5/14-pgs.10-
17. Alexander Grant & Co. - Discussion and possible action on: 12) Appd. wit
costs noted
a) Audit Report - FY 1979/80
b) Special Audit -- F Y 1979/80
18. Management improvement Corporation of America - Presentation (5/14-pg.6)
of proposal for study of Public Works Garage Operations. TBLD.to 5/28
(5/19-pgs.6,7)
19. Public Works Department - Personnel Adjustment - Report by TBLD. until
City Manager -- Discussion and possible action on deletion of receipt of bi
a_Main-tenan.c-e_ Plan I1 po-sit�on. - Mi—s Item�ates --- to Item under It. #20.
#20. )
20. Bid Authorization - Public Works Department -- Discussion and (5/19-pg.7)
possible action to authorize the City Manager to advertise Author.grante
for janitorial service for City Hall and Utilities West.
21. Bid Award - Utilities West -- Tem . Reso. #1614 - Discussion (5/19-pg.7)
and possible action to award a bid for removal of sludge DENIED
lime base.
22. Budget Transfer - Group Annuity Contract - Discussion and (5/19-Pgs-5,6
possible action to~approve a transfer from the Contingency & 9) Transfer
Account to G & A Outside Services in the amount of $2,000.00 Appd.
23. Professional Fee - Equitable Life Assurance Society - Dis- (5/19-pg.9)
cussion and possible action to approve payment of the admin- Appd.
istrative fees for the Group Annuity Contract - calendar
year 1979 in the amount of $2,020.00.
24. Budget Transfer - Recreation Department - Discussion and (5/19-pg.2)
possible action to approve a transfer from the Contingency (5/21-pg.2)
Account to the Recreation Department for a drinking fountain Trans.Appd.
at the park.
25. Tamarac Park Facilities - Fees - Temp. Reso. #1447 - Discus- (5/14-pg.1)
sion and possible action to establish fees for use of park TBLD.to 5/28
facilities.
26. Recreation Department - Summer Youth Pro ram - Report, dis- I
(5/19-pgs.2-4)
cussion and possible action to approve this program. Trans.Appd.
27. Independence Day Celebration - Report, discussion and pos- (5/19-pg.4)
sible action on Recreation Committee proposal for a 4th of DENIED
July celebration.
28.
Police Chief Apl2ointment -Report by City Manager, discussion
(5/14-pgs.24,;
and possible
_action. _ ---- . - - _ __.
Maclntoshs.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 2:00 P.M.
(5/14-pgs.14-
29.
Barry Eden - Rezoning Request - B-6 to B-1 - Petition #10-Z-
16)DENTED on
80 - Temp. Ord. #761 - First Reading. (located on the north-
1st Rdg.
east corner of McNab Road and 80th Avenue).
(5/14-pgs.16,
3D.
Tropical Gardens Nurser - 7910 University Drive - Rezoning
17)TBLD.for
Request,- B-6..to A-1 - Petition.#11-Z-80 - Temp. Ord. #762 -
receipt of
First Reading. (Lyons Commercial Subdivision #3 - Lot 11,
info.
Block 11).
(5/14-pgs.17--
31.
Phoenix Company - Rezoning Re nest - R-3 to B-3 - Petition
12-Z-80 - Temp. Ord. #763 - First Reading. (located on the
120)TBLD.to
5/28
south side of McNab Road,_660 feet west of Nob Hill Road).
M
M
32. Gary Wishnia -- Special Exception - Petition #13-Z-80 - Dis-
cussion and possible action on a request to permit a gasolin
service station in a B-2 Zoning District at the southeast
corner of Southgate Boulevard and University Drive. Temp.
Reso. #1604.
33. Elected Officials Terms of Office - Tem12. Ord. #723 - Amends
Code Section 2 by modifying the date which elected officials
take office. Discussion and possible action. Second Reading
34. Business Uses - Temp. Ord. #710 - Amending Code Section 28
by establishing restrictions on various types of businesses.
Second Reading.
35. Park and Recreation Site Acquisition - Temp. Ord. #742 -
Amends Code Section 20 relating to park and recreation lands
in RD-7, R-3 and R-4A zoning districts. Discussion and pos-
sible action. Second Reading.
36. Code S112plement #4 -- Temp. Ord. #752 - Discussion and pos-
sible action to adopt ^the 4th Supplement to the Code of
Ordinances. Second Reading.
37. Council District Boundaries - Temp. -Ord. #754 - Amends Code
Section 2 by removing the codification requirement for the
boundaries. Discussion and possible action. Second Reading,
PAGE FOUR.
(5/14-pgs.20-
22) TBLD. for
addtl. input.
(5/14-pg.22)
ORD.80-57
(5/14-pg.22)
ORD.80-62
(5/14-pgs.22,
23)
TBLD.to 5/28
(5/14-pg.23)
ORD.80-58
(5/14-pg.23)
ORD.80-59
38. City Council Regular Meetings - Temp. Ord. #755 - Amends Cad (5/14-pg.23)
Section 2 to conform with the Charter provision of the Augus ORD.80-60
recess. Discussion and possible action. Second Reading.
39. Woodmont - Tract 47 - Vacation of Easement - Temp. Ord. #757 (5/14-pg.24)
Discussion and possible action to vacate an entranceway ease ORD.80-61
ment to this tract from the golf course. Second reading.
LEGAL AFFAIRS
40. Tamarac Shop2ing Center - Discussion and possible action to
approve an additional extension to the site plan.
41. Broward County - McNab Road Project_ - Tem Reso. #1618 --
Discussion and possible action to approve an agreement with
the County for a utility relocation on McNab Road from Uni-
versity Drive east to 70th Avenue.
(5/19-pg.8)
�',xten.granted
(5/14-pg.2)
5/21-pgs.1,2)
PBLD.to 5/28
42. Broward County - Mosquito Control Program - Temp. Reso. #162 - (5/14-pg.28)
Discussion and possible action to approve an agreement for RESO.80-125
aerial spraying operations.
43. South Florida Water Management District - Assignment of Cana:
ResQrvations to'City - Report by City Attorney. Discussion
and possible action concerning Council authorizations to
further research this matter.
44. Occupational License Ordinance Amendment - Temp. Ord. #753 -
Amending regulations pertaining to jewelry businesses. Dis-
cussion and possible action. First Reading.
45. Setback Requirements -- Temp. Ord. #751 - Amending Code Sec-
tion 28-49 by reducing rear yard setback requirements in R-2
zoning districts. Discussion and possible action. First
Reading.
46. Site Plan Review Fees - Temp. Reso. #1619
for extensions of previously approved site
and possible action.
(5/21-pgs.2,3
TABLED
(5/14-pg.28)
Appd.on'lst
l.dg .
5/14-pg.. 5,
26) Appd. on
st Rdg.
- Establishing fees (5/19-pg.f.)
plans. Discussion (5/21-pg.4)
RESO.80-1z2
as amended.
47. Consumer Protection Boards - Temp. Reso. #1622 - Discussion
and possible action to endorse proposed Florida House of
Representatives bill to allow chartered County Consumer Pro-
tection Board to determine penalties for violation of certai
orders of such boards.
(5/19-pgs.8,9
RESO.80--129
PAGE FIVE.
48.
Southern Bell - Local Measured Service Rate - Temp. Reso.
(5/19-pg.1,2)
�RESO.80-128
#1623 - Discussion and possible action to oppose this rate
plan requested by Southern Bell to the Public Service Commis-
sion.
49.
Hazardous Waste Transport - Tem . Reso. #1624 - Discussion
(5/19-pg•9)
and possible action to urge the Public Service Commission to
RFSn.80-127
prohibit vehicles from transporting hazardous chemical waste
along roadways in Tamarac.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
50.
Spring Lake I - Discussion and possible action concerning
Appd.with cond
Certificates of Occupancy for this project.
b)&c)AGENDZZED
(See page 6)
51.
Commercial Plaza - Sign Waiver - Tem Reso.. #1594 - Discus-
(5/14-pgs.26,
o
sion and possible action on request to install one addition-
/ pg s.
15,16)RES0.80-
al directory sign for this shopping center.
132 with cond.
52.
Tamarac Paint and Wall a er - Shops of Tamarac - 8691 West
(5/14-pgs.13,
McNab Road - Sign Waiver - Temp_. Reso. #1603 - Discussion^
14)To be re -
and possible action on a request for a sign waiver for an
viewed 5/28
additional wall sign.
53.
Riverside Memorial Chapel - Discussion and possible action o
:(5/14-pgs.28,
29 & 5/21--pgs.
a) Site Plan
4,5) TBLD. to
5/28/
b) Landscape Plan
c) Plat - Temp. Reso. #1615
(5/19-pgs.4,5)
54.
Sunshine Plaza -- Discussion and possible action to approve
Appd. with
revised site plan for a storage room for the Publix Super-
conditions
market.
(5/14-pgs.12,
55.
Summit Bank West - Discussion and possible action on request
13 & 5/21 -pgs
for a six-month extension of the approved site plan.
5,6)Six mos.
extension
56.
Woodmont - Tracts 55 and 61 - Bond Release - Temp. Reso.
(5/14-pgs.2,
#1621 - Discussion and possible action to release a warrant
27,28)RESO.80-•
Letter of Guarantee posted by Toll Development.
122, 123 & 124
57.
Canal. Reservation Release - Temp. Reso. #1617 - Discussion
(5/19-pg.9)
and possible action to release a carnal reservation on Tract
RESO.80-126
A, Land Section 4, along Southgate Boulevard, approximately
170 feet east of 88th Avenue.
58.
Emergency Ordinance - Temp. Ord. #764 - Discussion and pos-
(5/21-pgs•6-11)
sible action to enact an emergency ordinance amending Ordi-
ppd. on lst
nance No. 80-35 - Comprehensive Utility Regulations - to
dg.as amended
modify the provisions pertaining to payment of contribution
charges and guaranteed revenues. (Agendized by V/M Massaro)
The following agreements are being prepared to be in
conformity with the proposed emergency ordinance and if sai
ordinance is not enacted, Council may not choose to take
action on the developers agreements:
59. Woodview - Tract 38 - Discussion and possible action to (5/21-pgs.11,14
approve a water and sewer developers agreement. (A endized BLED
OM Massar
60. Concord Village I - Discussion and possible action to ap- (5/21-pg.14)
prove an addendum to the water and sewer developers agree- TABLED
ment. (Agendized by V/M Massaro)
61. Southgate Gardens - East - Discussion and possible action
a) Site Plan
b) Landscape Plan
c) Vacation of Drainage Easement - Temp. Reso. #1582
d) Grant of Utility Easement - Temp. Reso. #1593
e) Grant of Canal Maintenance Easement - Temp. Reso. #1584
f) Agreement to Construct N.W. 71st Avenue'
g) water and Sewer Developers Agreement
(Agendized by V/M Massaro)
(5/21-pgs.14,15
PAB LE D
E7
1. J
PAGE SIX.
62.
Tamarac Gardens - Discussion and possible action on:
(5/21-pg.15)
a) Site Plan
TABLED
b) Plat - Tem . Reso. #1595
c) Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
(Agendized by V/M Massaro)
63.
Concord Villa e II - Discussion and possible action on:
(5/21-pg.15)
ABLED
a) Site Plan
b) Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
c)Agreement on Park and Recreation Dedications
(Agendized by V/M Massaro)
REPORTS
64.
City Council
(5/19--pgs.9-11)
65.
City Manager
66.
City Attorney
Copies of legislation to be considered are available for
reviewing and purchase in the Office of the City Clerk.
CITY OF TAMARAC
MARILYN BERTHOLF
CITY CLERK
PUBLIC HEARINGS, SPECIAL MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS
a)
Workshop, May 19, 1980, 2 p.m., Chambers -Further discussion
of off-street parking regulations.
b)
Reconvened Regular Meeting - Dates for reconvened sessions
have not been established as of this date except for May 21,
1980, 10 a.m., to cover Items #58 through #63.
AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
67.
Temp. Reso. #1627 - Establishing Water & Sewer Plan Review
(5/14-pg.1)
Fee - Discussion and possible action.
TABLED
68.
Financial Federal Savings &Loan - Discussion and possible
(5/14-pg.1)
action on:
(5/21-Pg$-12.
a) Reaffirming approval of the site plan
13,14)
b) Developer's Agreement - Water and Sewer
Appd.a) & b)
69.
Mitch Ceasar - Grants - Discussion and possible action.
(5/14-pgs.1,3,
4) Report
70.
Lewin Lot Purchase
(5/21--pg.1,12)
Check request
appd.
71.
Cypress Creek Commons - Bid Authorization
(5/21-pg.1,11,
12) Approved
50.
Spring Lake I - b)Temp.Reso.#1628 -Warranty Deed from LHI
5/21-pg.4)
for 50' Canal Row
RESO.80-134
c)Temp.Reso.#1629 -Acceptance of 20' Wide
RESO.80-133
Canal Maintenance Easement from LHI
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MAY 14, 1980
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Falck called the meeting to order on Wednesday,
May 14, 1980, at 9:30 A.M., in the Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Walter W. Falck
Vice --Mayor Helen Massaro
Councilman Irving PR. Disraelly
Councilman. Irving Zemel
Councilwoman Marjorie Ketch
ALSO PRESENT:
City Manager, Edward A. Gross
City Attorney, Arthur M. Birken
Ass't. City Clerk, Carol Evans
Clerk/Steno., Mimi Reiter
MEDITATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Falck called for a Moment of
Silent Meditation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
Mayor Falck advised that two aides of Congressman Mica will be in the
Council Chambers between 10:00 and 12:00 A.M. on Thursday, May 15th.
The Mayor reviewed the various items scheduled, and the time allotments
on the agenda. He noted that the first recessed meeting would be on
Monday, May 19, 1980, at 9:00 A.M., and the second recessed meeting will
be on Wednesday, May 21, 1980, at 10:00 A.M.
BOARDS AND COMMITTEES
14. Recreation Board - Temp. Reso. #1613 - Discussion and possible action
Tape to appoint at least five (5) members.
Side
#2 - AND -
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
25. Tamarac Park Facilities -- Fees - Temp. Reso. #1447 -- Discussion and
possible action to establish fees for use of park facilities.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
Tabled to the 5/28/80 meeting
C/M Zemel MOVED to table Items #14 and #25 to the next regular meeting
of May 28, 1980, and C/14 Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
67. Temp. Reso. #1627 - Establishing Water and Sewer Plan Review Fee -
Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
V/M Massaro MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT a resolution establishing
water and sewer plan review fees, and C W Ketch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
68. Financial Federal Savings & Loan -- Discussion and possible action on:
a) Reaffirming approval of the site plan
b) Developer's Agreement - Water and Sewer
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
V/M Massaro MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT Financial Federal Savings and
Loan, a) Reaffirming approval of the site plan, and b) Water and Sewer -
Developer's Agreement, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
69. Mitch Ceasar - Grants - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
(See pages 3 & 4 )
-1- 5/14/80
mr/
C/M Zemel MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT the item of Mitch Ceasar, for
discussion of grants, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
56. Woodmont - Tracts 55 and 61 - Bond Release - Temp. Reso. #1621-a)Dis-
cussion and possible action to release a warranty Letter of Guarantee
posted by Toll Development, b) Acceptance of public improvements -
Release of the Bonds.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: b) Acceptance of public
improvements - AGENDIZED BY CONSENT (See pages 27 & 28)
V/M Massaro MOVED that subsection b) be added to the item, for Release
of the Bonds, and C/W Kelch SECONDED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
LEGAL AFFAIRS
41. Brow_ard County - McNab Road Project - Temp. Reso. #1618 - Discussion
and possible action to approve an agreement with the County for a
utility relocation on McNab Road from University Drive east to 70th
Avenue.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: To be considered 5/21/80.
Mr. Gross recommended to hold this item for consideration at the
recessed meeting of 5/21/80, because an Agreement has not been presented.
The City Attorney indicated that Items #29, #30 and #31 were rezonings, and
required Development Review Agreements, with authorization to sign and
execute; which would be considered at the time of site plan approval. He
said that under the Land Use Plan, it has to be so noted that the Develop-
ment Review Requirements have been satisfied, or an Agreement which would
indicate deferment to a future date. He further stated that rezoning of
properties does not define density, and findings are premature; with the
property owners being apprised of the need for document submission.
Mayor Falck advised that Items #29, #30 and #31, were public hearings,
and consideration will be given at that time.
TAMARAC UTILITIES - WEST
1. Operations - Status Retort - Discussion and possible action.
Mr. Gross advised that a meeting was held this morning with Mayor Falck,
Mr. Keating and the Consulting Engineers, with a determination that
everything was progressing, and the sewer plant was below 4,000,000 gal-
lons of operational daily capacity. It was, he said, anticipated that
a contractor would be available for the estimated cost to break down
Plant #2, in order to determine the necessary repairs.
He said that outside the plant area the infiltration has been detected,
and is in the process of being grouted. Mr. Gross further added that
Concord I and II has been addressed, which the Vice -Mayor made inquiries
about, and has been submitted by memo to Council, from Tony Nolan.
He additionally stated that the lake will be tested as to problems,
on Friday, 5/16/80. He also noted that to -date Plants 1, 3 and 4 are
in good operation, with Plant 2 not being satisfactory, which will be
taken down.
Mr. Gross said they were short-handed in the area of personnel, with
three applications having been received for Waste -Water Treatment Plant
Operators. He said that the Consulting Engineer felt that many problems
which have been alleviated, would remain in that manner, if the proper
personnel are employed. There was, he said, a recommendation of five
(5) new positions for the Department, which was being reviewed.
Mr. Gross said that when Plant #2 is taken down, the City will be pre-
pared to flow another 400,000 gallons to the County,which would leave
the other three plants in satisfactory condition.
The City Manager advised that an ad was being placed in the newspaper
5/14/80
-2- mr/
a
for a Director, which would indicate the salary.
Mr. Gross said that the lift stations and catch basins were poorly
built, with leaks in the sewer collection areas and pipes. The
Engineers, he said, have advised that the western area construction
was not adequate, and required rebuilding of the lift station, plus
grouting, because the brick and mortar walls were leaking.
C/M Disraelly said that originally the diversion from the Mainlands
area was up to 500,000 gallons, and inquired as to the present flow,
to which Mr. Gross responded that it was very close to that figure,
and would be used at the time that Plant #2 has been taken down.
The City Manager also responded that one position was still not filled
in the TV crew, but they were being trained.
C/M Disraelly also requested a total cost of the facility "per cents
per thousand dollars", for comparison to the County, to which the City
Manager responded that the figures were not yet available.
Mayor Falck indicated that bonds from certain projects were drawing
close to the expiration period. He felt that the City Manager, City
Engineer and Consulting Engineer, should establish a definite schedule
for tie-in from one area to another, for the necessary repairs.
PRESENTATTONS/AWARDS
3. Tamarac Elementary School - Student Awards - Presentation to student
winner of Contest jointly sponsored by the City and Summit Bank for
design of the cover of the Summer Recreation Brochure.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Award presented to
Chanel Hershey, by Mr. Osborn, President
of the Summit Bank.
Mayor Falck advised that a contest was recently held for the design
of the Summer Recreation Brochure, by the Recreation Department. He
said that 57 students of the Tamarac Elementary School participated
in the contest, under the guidance of Mrs. Sandy MacFarland, a fifth
grade teacher at the school. Also, a $50.00 Savings Bond was donated
by the Summit Bank, for the winner. The art work, he said, will be
on the cover of over 3,000 copies of the Summer Brochure, with dis-
tribution throughout Tamarac and Pinewood Elementary Schools, plus
the local merchants in the City.
Chanel, Hershey was named the winner, with the award presented by
Mr. Osborn -of Summit Bank.
Sharon Ellis, the Recreation Director, indicated that there are no
losers, and everyone will be given a pass for one free game of bowling
at Don Carters Bowling Alley.
4. City Photography_ Contest - Presentation to five (5) winners of the
City's Photography Contest.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Presentation to Rod Titus,
Marian Sennett, Fred Kronstat, Seymour Zipper
and Hilda Gianola.
Mayor Falck indicated that the City's Recreation Department sponsored
a Photography Contest for youths, adults and retireees, with two in-
dividual contests being held during the months of February and March,
and the final one during the month of April.
Youth Category - Rod Titus; Adult Category, 2nd Place - Marian Sennett;
Adult Category, lst Place - Fred Kronstat; Retiree Category, 2nd Place --
Seymour Zipper; and Retiree Category, 1st Place - Hilda Gianola.
TEMPORARY RECESS CALLED.
69. Mitch Ceasar - Grants - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Report presented by Mr. Ceasar
(See page 1
MIC
5/14/80
mr/
Mr. Ceasar distributed copies of a letter that he received from Con-
gressman Mica, and pertained to the SSES Grant, which involves the
sewer grant. He further added that these monies have been temporarily
impounded, and will not become available until early September. How-,
ever, in November and December, the City of Tamarac will be considered,
due to a priority list. The letter, he said, was an official confirma-
tion from Congressman Mica's office.
He discussed the Caporella Park grant, which was currently pending,
and stated that the Department of Natural Resources and their divi-
sions, will be reviewing the grant for the next two weeks. He added
that approximately $800,000.00 was available, and the total amount
of projects totalling to $2,000,000.00. Mr. Ceasar said that Rep.
McPherson of Cooper City was giving extensive assistance to the City
with the application. The last step, if clearance has been given
by this Department, will be determined within the next two or three
weeks; for which Mr. Ceasar indicated that he has been contacting
many groups for their support of this project. He felt that the total
project was approximately $76,000.00, with $13,000.00 being paid by
the City. Mr. Ceasar explained that the first $50,000.00 is free with
no match,and then involves a 50-50 match after the $50,000.00.
Mx. Ceasar said that he is working on a bill that has been introduced
by Representative Mills of Gainsville, which provides access for handi-
capped to attend meetings, but felt that portions of the bill are not
completely satisfactory.
Mr.Gross said that everything at the City Hall, outside of the front
ramp, was within the Code of the Bill, as required.
PRESENTATIONS/AWARDS
5. American Legion - Presentation by Mayor Falck of Proclamation declaring
May 23rd and 24th as Poppy Days in Tamarac.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Presentation made by
Mayor Falck
Mayor Falck read the Proclamation, with presentations to Louise Dillon
and Adelaide Werner of Unit 265 American Legion Auxiliary.
6. Senior Industries - Presentation to the City of a replica of the recrea-
tion playground in appreciation of the City's cooperation extended to
Senior Industries.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Presentation made to
Sharon Ellis by Lee Sprince.
Ms. Sprince indicated that Al Roth created the replica of the recreation
playground, and further noted that he was very gifted. She also pre-
sented a plaque made with pistachio nuts, by Al Roth, to the Recreation
Director, Sharon Ellis.
Mayor Falck congratulated everyone on their efforts in accomplishing
this project.
7. Broward Center for the Blind - Presentation by Sheila Johns, Executive
Director, of the activities and objectives of this organization.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Presentation made by
Sheila Johns, Executive Director.
Ms. Johns said that local money was always needed to generate federal
funds for the blind. She also indicated that they have a "Lighthouse"
in Broward County, which will be a rehabilitation and social center,
in accommodating the needs for the young and the elderly, on a five-
day basis. She said the agency has purchased this building, which
has 9,500 square feet, is a non-profit organization, and does not in-
volve any charges. She requested a donation by the City of Tamarac
of $1,000.00 towards this new area, where 1240 clients were being
served. Ms. Johns said it was located at 650 N. Andrews Avenue, in
downtown Ft. Lauderdale, with adequate parking in the rear.
Mayor Falck said that Council will take the requested donation under
advisement.
-4--
5/14/80
mr/
L
� � r
16. Consent A enda
a) Minutes of 3/31/80 - Reconvened Regular Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
b) Minutes of 4/4/80 - Special. Meeting - Approval recommended by
City Clerk.
c) Minutes of 4/9/80 - Regular Meeting - Approval recommended by
City Clerk.
d) Minutes of 4/23/80 - Regular Meeting - Approval recommended by
City Clerk.
e) Minutes of 4/14/80 - Reconvened Regular Meeting - Approval recom-
mended by City Clerk.
f) Alan F. Ruf -- Consulting Attorney - 5/9/80 - $1,200.00 - Approval
recommended by City Attorney.
g) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 4/3/80 -
$1,185.75-Account #425-368-535-310 - Approval recommended by City
Engineer.
h) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer -- 4/3/80 -
$833.38 - Account #428-371--535-552 - Approval recommended by City
Engineer.
i) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 4/4/80 -
$4,377.35 - Account #429-371-535-622 - Approval recommended by City
Engineer.
j) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner - Consulting Engineer - 4/8/80 -
$5,560.25 - Account #350-500-531; $195.00 - Account #1-155-515-310
total $5,755.25 - Approval recommended by City Engineer.
k) Bid Authorization - Parking lot lights for City facilities - Ap-
proval recommended by City Manager.
1) Bid Authorization - City Hall roof repairs - Approval recommended
by City Manager.
m) Bid Authorization - Roadway Resurfacing - Approval recommended by
City Manager.
n) Bid Authorization - Police Department telephone/dispatch security
tape system - Approval recommended by City Manager.
o) Occupational License Fee - Refund - to Louis B. Fisher Real Estate for auctioneer fee erroneously charged - Approval recommended by
City Attorney and City Clerk.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) through e) Approved as corrected;
f through j), n) and o) Approved; k), 1) and m) Tabled
to reconvened meeting of 5/21/80.
Mr. Gross requested that k), 1) and m) be removed for discussion on
5/21/80, because a maximum time limit has to be indicated, and should
be returned to the Purchasing Agent.
C/W Kelch requested that e) be removed from the consent agenda, for
separate consideration.
C/M Disraelly inquired whether the bill for Alan Ruf, which is divided
into two areas, namely, the Utility and the City Account, should be
handled separately or under one bill.
Mr. Gross said that everything is handled out of the General Fund,
and then charged to the Utility.
C/M Disraelly MOVED that the minutes a), b), c), d),e),as amended, and
f), g), h), i), j) and n) and o), be approved, and V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
CIM Disraelly MOVED that the minutes of 4/14/80 be approved, as cor-
rected, and V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: C/W
Kelch
- Nay
C/M
Zemel
- Aye
C/M
Disraelly
- Aye
V/M
Massaro
- Aye
Mayor Falck
- Aye
V/M Massaro MOVED that k), 1) and m) is to be tabled to the recessed
meeting of 5/21/80, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
-5-
5/14/80
mr/
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
18. Management Improvement Cor2oration of America - Presentation of
proposal for study of Public Works Garage Operations.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to meeting of 5/28/80.
Mr. Gross said this item was being presented for purposes of effecting
an efficient operation of the garage, which includes the equipment
of the Utility, and the Fire Department. Fie said that a contract was
submitted for management work in this area, which was reviewed by the
City Attorney and himself, and does indicate that the City is not ob-
ligated if it is found to be unsatisfactory.
C/M Disraelly noted that this information was presented to him late
yesterday afternoon, at 3:55 P.M., and has not had the oppb.rtunity
to read it, to which the Vice -Mayor concurred.
C/M Zemel indicated that two City Council members were out--of--town
this past weekend. He MOVED to table this item to the next regular
meeting of 5/28/80, which would be discussed at the Pre -Agenda Workshop,
and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
BOARDS AND COMMITTEES - Appointments
8. Planning Commission - Temp. Reso. #1609 - Discussion and possible
action to appoint three (3) regular and up to five (5) alternate
members.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved -
Maurice Meyers, Martin Schoenfeld and
Carl Alper, as regular members; with
Alan Stevens and Arthur H. Gottesman
appointed as alternates.
RESOLUTION NO. R- 1Q- 4I 20 PASSED.
C/M Disraelly noted that the terms of Maurice Meyers, Martin Schoenfeld
and Harry Weisenberg expire, with the expiration of the term of Carl
Alper, as alternate.
The following individuals were listed, who submitted applications
for appointment; Bernard Schlosser, Doug Christy, Arthur Gottesman,
Dr. Barry Green, Stan Watsky, Alan Stevens, Henry Lapidus, plus the
members whose terms have expired, namely Maurice Meyers, Martin
Schoenfeld, Harry Weisenberg and Carl Alper.
C/M Disraelly nominated Martin Schoenfeld, Maurice Meyers and Carl Alper,
as regular members.
C/W Kelch nominated Doug Christy, as an alternate; V/M Massaro nominated
Henry Lapidus and Harry Weisenberg; and C/M Zemel indicated Arthur
Gottesman.
V/M Massaro MOVED to close the nominations for regular members, to
Maurice Meyers, Martin Schoenfeld and Carl Alper, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Melanie Reynolds stated that she was disturbed with having Carl Alper
as a regular member on the Planning Commission, because he was on
another Committee, and felt that he did -not have the proper background
for such an appointment.
Tape Mr. Weisenberg requested to be removed from the nominations, as an
Side alternate.
#3
C/W Kelch MOVED to appoint two alternates, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Mr. Gross collected the closed ballots; with the following two alternates
being named on all five - namely, Alan Stevens and Arthur Gottesman.
(ATTACHMENT #1)
:11$ :
5/14/80
mr/
ATTACHMENT #1
5714780 - ITEM #8
qo�
Qorg'SOIAJ
w4w4r#j.s
-7-
COUNCILHAAl
I12VIN6r zgwcz--o
�8- 5/14/80
mr/
C/M Zemel MOVED that Alan Stevens and Arthur Gottesman be appointed
as alternates to the Planning Commission, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
MOTION AND SECOND WITHDRAWN TO PERMIT READING OF THE RESOLUTION.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1609, and included the appointment
of three regular members and two alternate members, and so MOVED for
its adoption, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
9. Beautification Committee - Temp._ Reso. #_1608 - Discussion and possible
action to appoint five 5) regular and up to three (3) alternate
members.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved - RESOLUTION NO.R- per'// PASSED.
Ray Baade, Della Cardamon,Eaye Rosenstein,
Anthony Smaligo and Florence Bochenek, as
Regular Members; Dick Rubin and Seymour
Polster, as Alternates.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1608.
The following members requested reappointment; Ray Baade,Della Cardamon,
Faye Rosenstein,Anthony Smaligo, and Seymour Polster, but ap-
plications were submitted by Florence Bochenek, William McGrath,
Dick Rubin and Bernard Schlosser.
C/M Disraelly nominated Ray Baade of District 3,Della Cardamon of
District 4,Faye Rosenstein of District 4, Florence Bochenek and
Anthony Smaligo, as regular members.
V/M Massaro MOVED to close nominations for regular members, and
C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
C/M Disraelly nominated Seymour Polster, as an alternate member.
C/W Kelch nominated Dick Rubin, who applied for a position on this
Committee, and said that he would be available for special consulta-
tion or regular attendance.
C/W Kelch MOVED to close nominations for the alternates, and V/M Massaro
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
C/M Disraelly MOVED that Temp. Reso. #1608 be approved, with the
inclusion in Section 1 of the following names; Ray Baade,Della Cardamon,
Faye Rosenstein,Anthony Smaligo and Florence Bochenek, as regular mem-
bers; and Seymour Polster and Dick Rubin, as alternate members. C/M
Zemel SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
10. Board of Consumer Affairs - Temp. Reso. #1606 - Discussion and possible
action to appoint twelve (12) regular members.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Twelve (12) Regular Members RESOLUTION NO.R-Q - // PASSED.
reappointed.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1606, and V/M Massaro MOVED to nominate
the entire Board of twelve (12) regular members, who are currently
serving, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED, and indicated the following names
were Robert Schurr, Nat Cohen, Mary DiCandia, Peter Lawson, Charles
Levinson, Irving Lopatey, Herman Marin, Moni Avidon, Isaac Feldman,
Charles Fox, Winifred Ostrum and Joseph Sobel.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
C/M Disraelly MOVED to adopt Temp. Reso. #1606, with the existing
twelve (12) members, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
5/14/80
mr/
M
11. Public Information Committee - Temp. Reso. #1611 - Discussion and
possible action to appoint five (5) members.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted as amended, by RESOLUTION NO.R- g0� ��d PASSED.
appointing six (6) members; Sydney Bass,
Norman Karr, Israel Krugman, Gerald Adler,
Jerome Smith and Shirley Blumfield.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1611.
C/W Kelch requested that the title be amended to indicate the appoint-
ment of six (6) rather than five (5) regular members, because the
Charter has been amended to state "no less than three (3) members".
She MOVED to nominate Sydney Bass, the present Chairman, Norman Karr,
Israel Krugman, Gerald Adler, Jerome Smith, who is an exceptional
candidate and associated with Visual Graphics, and Shirley Blumfield,
who is residing in the Isles of Tamarac. V/M Massaro SECONDED the
motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
C/W Kelch MOVED to adopt Temp. Reso. #1611, with the title change
to appoint six (6) rather than five (5) regular members, as noted,
and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
12. Board of Social Services - Temp. Reso. #1612 - Discussion and possible
action to appoint three (3) members.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved, as amended,ap- RESOLUTION NO.R- (�Q - �OC� ^PASSED.
pointing six(6) regular members; namely,
Virginia Taylor, Herman Lacoff, Mary DiCandia,
Charlotte Tepper, Robert Carey, and Jerry Heller.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1612.
V/M Massaro suggested the nomination of six (6) members, namely,
Herman Lacoff, Jerome Heller, Virginia Taylor, Mary DiCandia,
Charlotte Tepper and Robert Carey, and recommended that nominations
be closed.
C/M Disraelly MOVED that the title be changed in Temp. Reso. #1612,
for the appointment of six (6) members, and be adopted to include
the names, as noted, and V/M Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
17. Alexander Grant & Co. - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Audit Report - FY 1979/80
b) Special Audit - FY 1979/80
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Six Month Report of Utility -West
and Year -End Audit of Utility, Approved, with costs
as noted.
a) -Mr. Birken said that he was requested to contact First Boston,
and there was a delay in their coordination with Alexander Grant.
He said that First Boston did not require the performance of an
audit. A letter, he stated, was delivered to Council, which in-
dicated that Alexander Grant & Co. offered to perform a limited
review of the books of Utility -West for the fee which was stated.
He further stated that the Utility has not been audited since
December of 1978, and the budget is approximately equal to the
City. The records and books, he said, were kept in a proper
manner, rather than waiting for the end of the fiscal year for
a determination. The City Attorney said that if there is no audit,
and mistakes performed by the Finance Department are of a material
nature, then it was possible that the bond holders would expect
-10-
5/14/80
mr/
I
F J
the City to
audit would
it would no
statement.
make up the losses. lie also said that expense of an
be chargeable to bond proceeds, but with a limited review
be, because it could not be included in the official
C1W Kelch favored an audit, and felt that the financial difference
would be compensated by legal and safety standards, and should be
immediately instituted.
Mr. Emmer said that he submitted a Letter, dated 5/l/80, which recapped
all the various fees and options for the audit. The additional amount
of money involved, he said, for a six (6) month audit as of 3/31/80,
is approximately $9,500.00, for the full audit, which will reduce the
cost of the September 30th audit.
He further indicated that the six (6) month audit will be $14,000.00,
plus waiving and absorbing all start-up costs associated with the
Utility, which would otherwise have been $1,500.00, if the Utility
was audited as of September 30th. The year-end audit for the Utility
will be $11,000.00, and would be $3,000.00 less, as a result of the
six (6) month work on the Utility. Included in the audit, he said,
will be the provision of "full comfort" to the underwriter, First
Boston, if required, in connection with the bond issue. He explained
this provision, by stating that at the time of sale, certain questions
and records will be investigated, with a review of City Council minutes,
up to a period of five days within the sale of the bonds. Thereafter,
he stated, a letter will be provided to the underwriters, which would
indicate that as a result of this, nothing has been determined to be
of a material nature, which would affect the financial position of
the City.
Mr. Emmer responded.to a question of Mayor Falck, by stating that
his company assisted the Finance Director in the method of recording
the acquisition of the assets, as to value. lie further added that
the Finance Department has been furnishing financial statement on the
Utility.
Mayor Falck concurred with C/W Kelch, as to the Utility having a
similar budget to the City, and would also recommend that the entire
audit be made.
C/M Disraelly said that the letter of 4/18/80 indicated that a complete
audit would commence on 5/5/80, with a completion date of 6/20/80,
to which Mr. Emmer said that two weeks would be required, and will
slide the final date back to two weeks. Mr. Emmer further added that
the 3/31/80 audit would be completed by the end of June, and the next
audit period would be in December. Six month numbers, he said, does
not require an up -date, and First Boston indicated that six-month
numbers will be included in the official statement.
Mr. Emmer said that in the official statement, as relates to the bonds
being sold in June, it would include six-month numbers, and are avail-
able. But, he stated, they would additionally request "comfort", which
is not an up -date, but involves an extension to nine months, but felt
this would not be necessary.
C/M Disraelly said that a memorandum from the City Attorney, which
was dated 12/10/79, it was noted that an engagement letter should
provide that all outstanding bond and note resolutions would be re-
viewed by the auditor, for compliance with the City.
Mr. Emmer said he would be pleased to up -date this, especially when
a bond issue is outstanding, whereby a bond compliance opinion is
considered to be part of the audit report.
Mr. Birken inquired as to interest rates, and if action would be
required prior to the end of June, if this could be accomplished, to
which Mr. Emmer said they could accelerate certain items, but there
were some procedures where a third party is involved, and did require
confirmations. Ile did state that they would commence with this as
quickly as possible, and possibly extend the number of work hours on
their part.
acc
5/14/80
mr/
C/M Disraelly MOVED that the six-month audit report of the Utility -
West, as of 3/31/80, be approved, and that the year-end audit for
the Utility, as of 9/30/80, be approved, and in compliance with the
letter of 5/l/80, that all City funds, as of 9/30/80 be approved,
respectively, to include the sums of $14,000.00, $11,000.00 and
$14,000.00, with a total fee structure of $39,000.00. C/W Kelch
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
C/M Disraelly clarified the motion, as to the 3/31/80 Utility being
charged against the bond issue, and the year-end audit will be charged
to the regular fee of the Utility, with the City funds being in G & A.
Mr. Birken said if the bonds are not sold, and the interim audit is
not used, then the audit would come from the General Fund, and what-
ever audit is applied, would come from the Utility.
MEETING RECESSED FOR LUNCH TO 1:30 P.M.
MEETING CALLED TO ORDER, ROLL CALL TAKEN, AND ALL PRESENT.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
55. Summit Bank West -- Discussion and possible action on request for a
six-month extension of the approved site plan.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to recessed meeting
of 5/21/80.
Julian Bryan represented Summit Bank, and said that approximately one
year previous the final site plan was approved for University Drive
and 61st Street, on the southwest corner. At that time, he said,
they were aware of a potential alignment problem with 61st Street
going east into the existing residential development. He additionally
said this was sent to the County, wherein an agreement was instituted
with Mr. Goldberg. It was determined, he said, that no additional
right-of-way will be given over and above what is indicated on the
site plan, but significant fees will be paid for road impacts, which
Mr. Goldberg has reluctantly agreed to.
Mr. Bryan said that the six-month extension was being requested in
order to resolve this situation, and pay the fees at the County. He
further added that the plat has not been recorded at the County, and
the road impact fees have not been paid. Mr. Bryan stated that Staff
review recommended items subject to approval; 1) on -site retention,
2) handicapped parking, and another item, which he could not recall.
He felt there was adequate space for inclusion of handicapped parking,
but could not anticipate Mr. Goldberg's manner of handling the on -site
retention. Mr. Bryan said that comments by Staff involved 3)parking
lot lighting being shown, which would not be a problem, and 4) walk-
in opening for the dumpsters, as per Ordinance 79-67, which could be
resolved.
V/M Massaro felt that action could not be taken, because it required
a revised site plan, and the City has to be made aware of the County
ruling, as to the roadway. She also noted that parking has to be
changed and lighting would have to be shown on the plan. The Vice -
Mayor and Mr. Keating concurred that the drainage has to be reviewed,
with submission of a revised site plan, also incorporating recommenda-
tions of Staff. Retention, she said, would be required, or the neces-
sary fees paid, with payment of a fee for up -grading of the drainage
system, at $130.00 per acre.
She said this item should be tabled to the recessed meeting of
Wednesday, May 21st, also noting that a Developers Agreement is re-
quired.
Mr. Bryon said that he was aware of the City's requirements, and will
get documentation from the Engineer's office, and then submit it to
Council.
-12- 5/14/80
mr/
V/M Massaro reviewed the requirements; namely, 1) submission of a
revised site plan, 2) correction of the road, and whether the County
will be accepting this, as noted on the site plan; with submission of
a letter from the County to the City, as to the impact money, 3)also,
changes, if necessary, on the plat, 4) engineering to be checked,
5) retention, 6)necessary fees in the Developers Agreement, and 7)
submission of the proper check to conform.
Mr. Birken indicated that he sent a memo to Council concerning possible
water and sewer modifications, and inquired whether the new proposed
agreement or the old agreement should be considered. He also stated
there were some modifications and guaranteed revenues, and would re-
quire a determination prior to the May 21st meeting.
V/M Massaro felt that guaranteed revenues were important, as far as
commercial development was concerned.
V/M Massaro MOVED to table Item #55, to the 5/21/80 meeting, subject
to the applicant filing a revised site plan, through regular channels,
with the necessary fee, and to have the engineering approved by the
City Engineer, also, including the recommended items which Council
and Staff previously noted. 1) The site plan has to indicate exactly
where the road is, and who will be installing it, 2) execution of
the Developers Agreement, 3) submit an appropriate check, 4) show
the retention area or be prepared the required fee of $130.00 per
acre, for up -grading of the drainage, and 5) be subject to current
development fees. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
52. Tamarac Paint and Wallpaper -- Shops of Tamarac - 8691 West McNab Road -
Sign Waiver - Temp_. Reso. #1603 - Discussion and possible action on
a request for a sign waiver for an additional wall sign.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Applicant to remove sign,
which item will be reviewed, and considered
at the 5/28/80 meeting.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Reso. #1603.
Ray Baade, Chairman of the Beautification, presented the item, by
stating that the applicant appeared before the Beautification Committee,
which involved an existing business, and the relocation of two signs.
He said this involved the relocation of the east and west signs; with
adequate space on the west side to affix the letters, but the east
side was under a breeze -way, and was a walk -way. Mr. Baade said that
the applicant desired placing the sign on the fascia►with a portion
of this being over the Barton Candy shop.
He said that the waiver indicated that the letters, "Tamarac Paint
and Wallpaper" - be affixed on the wall inside the breeze -way, but
would be visible on an angle, from the parking area, to the south
of the hair salon, and east of the former location.
Mr. Baade said there was disagreement as to the letter coloring, with
the waiver request indicating yellow letters. It was, he said, the
recommendation of the Beautification Committee to approve the waiver,
by cutting down the sign, and permitting it to be placed on the wall,
rather than the fascia with yellow lettering, rather than red.
C/M Disraelly stated that the sign has to be placed on the fasciaeand
not the building, and referred to a sketch on the blackboard. He
stated that the original sign was moved to the north, with the letter
colors being changed from red to yellow. Presently, he said, a request
was being made to place another sign in the breezeway, but the City's
ordinance provides the sign be placed at the store. He further noted
that at 1:30 P.M. this day, the sign was affixed to the fascia of the
breezeway.
Mr. Baade indicated that the management of a complex requested that
signs not be placed on the side of the building, facing 70th Street.
He said that due to the present proposed location, and as Chairman of
the Beautification Committee, his recommendation would be for denial
-13-
5/14/80
mr/
of the waiver, unless the sign is affixed on the side of the breeze-
way.
Barry Eden said that he was generally not involved with signs being
placed by the tenants of the shopping center. He indicated at a
Beautification Committee meeting that signs should not be permitted
on 70th Street, because of condominiums that were being built in the
area.
Florence Bochenek said that she was at the Beautification Committee
meeting, and was aware of the discussion, and felt this sign was not
in conformance with the other stores.
Mr. Baade indicated that originally the Beautification Committee denied
both sign requests for the east and west sides, because a color criteria
was involved, with both signs being red. After the vote to deny, he
said, the management of the complex stated that lie would bear the cost
of changing the sign colors to yellow. Thereafter, he stated, the
Committee rescinded the denial of the west sign, and voted its approval,
with yellow lettering.
Mr. Baade felt the breezeway sign waiver should be denied, because
of insufficient space for proper display in a small area.
Mr. Gross said there was a permit for the sign at their original store,
but was not aware of any permits in the present location.
C/M Disraelly said that it would have been his recommendation to
Council, after viewing the space, to allow a sign to be placed at
the location. But, he said, that placing signs without complete
authorization and conformity, would involve a change in his decision.
V/M Massaro felt that if the sign was over --shadowing an area, it should
be removed. She also said that if the sign was put --up without a permit,
then it should be taken -down immediately, and wait for a report from
the Chairman.
Mr. Eden felt that due to confusion at the Beautification Committee
meeting, that the sign should be viewed, prior to removal,based:on deci-
sion of the City Council.
V/M Massaro MOVED that the sign be removed, and a determination will
be made by those individuals wishing to view the subject matter, and
it be considered at the next regular meeting, as to approval of the
waiver. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
29. Barry Eden -- Rezoning__Request - B-6 to B-1 - Petition #10-Z-80 -
Temp. Ord. #761 - First Reading. (located on the northeast corner of
McNab Road and 80th Avenue).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Denied on 1st Reading.
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #761.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public.
Robert K. Hagleman, a homeowner at Academy Hills, said this building
was to be located directly behind them, and would request that the
B-6 zoning remain. He stated that letters were sent to the Vice -
Mayor opposing this rezoning, with 14 additional letters being pre-
sented to the City Clerk.this day.
Tape Mr. DeMarco of Academy Hills, said the people objected to changing
Side the rezoning from B-6 to B-1.
#4
Barry Eden, the petitioner, said there was a sign posted, and felt
that Greg Darby should present this item, as his representative.
He noted that a meeting was held at Academy Hills Recreation Center,
wherein he presented the intention for this rezoning.
-14-- 5/14/80
mr/
A
r � �
Greg Darby of Darby & Way, said this rezoning was considered by the
Planning Commission, with objections being presented by the residents.
He said the residents objected to restaurants with food service, the
trash and odors that were involved. Because of these objections,
it was determined by the petitioner to deed restrict the site from
restaurant usage. Also, 200 feet adjacent to the property, would be
deed restricted, he stated, which would not permit food of any type
to be sold or traded in the area.
He said the dumpster location was another major problem which was
discussed at the Planning Commission. He determined that it would
be encompassed into the building, with a roof, landscaping, and com-
pletely enclosed from view by the residents. He further added that
B-6 zoning presently permits food establishments; also three-story
office buildings, with elevator and mechanical equipment.
He reiterated that the intended use of this complex would be for
no "on premises" food or beverages, but commercial use would permit
professional offices with limited working hours, and less ingress and
egress traffic.
Mr. Darby said there will be a setback towards the Academy Hills
property of 50 feet, by Code, and in excess of 60 feet, being 67 feet
to the property line. He also noted that 10 feet of landscaping will
be included, and a six (6) foot concrete wall on the north, with no
visible mechanical equipment from any side of the building, which will
be screened below the parapet.
Mr. Darby advised that a Farm Store was being considered, with no
cooking or on -site consumption, but involving only sales.
Barry Eden said the Farm Store was a new concept, with mini --grocery
sales, and involved a more diversified line of groceries.
Dick King, a representative of Farm Stores, said this type of store
would be more intensified than a 7-11 typical convenience operation,
but similar to a small grocery store.This would not include fruits
and vegetables, and would involve 300 items. He anticipated that the
hours would be from 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M.
Ben Marino, Vice -President of the Academy Hills Association, felt
there were many small stores in the neighborhood, and the people were
requesting office buildings.
Morton Student, a concerned citizen, said the area under consideration
would involve noise and traffic constantly, and would disrupt the
peace and quiet of the neighborhood. Ile also said that the Planning
Commission voted against such approval, because it would involve over-
crowding of stores. Mr. Student said that B-6 zoning should be re-
tained, until something else is determined for use on that parcel of
property.
Mr. DeMarco said there was reference to a meeting held at Academy
Hills clubhouse, and the people were not only against a restaurant,
but the entire shopping center.
Stuart Walker said that Concord Village also had to be considered,
which was directly across the street. This area did involve a traffic
problem, and felt that the people did not want the shopping center
located in the designated area. Mr. Walker was an owner at Academy Hills
Louis Stone, an owner at Academy Hills, felt that 200 to 300 lineal
feet would be occupied by the developer, from N.W. 80th to University
Drive, going east, with the balance of the property being 1000 to
1500 lineal feet to the corner of the bank. He inquired as to the
balance of the area, and the zoning which will be designated for this.
C/M Disraelly inquired whether there would be objections if the
shopping center was built without a food store, to which Mr. Stone
replied that the people would still oppose this type of shopping center,
and requested that the property be retained with B-6 zoning.
Irving Hirsch discussed deed restrictions, which the City does not
control.
0141
5/14/80
mr/
Jan Tabor, a resident of Academy Hills, said that professional
buildings would maintain working hours from 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.,
but convenience stores would operate from 7:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M.,
and involved problems relating to school children and the sale of
beer and cigarettes. She further added that the people would like
to keep the area private, without outside interference.
Cheryl Ciarnelli, a renter in Academy Hills, said that everyone was
opposed to the stores, but would request that those people who are
in favor of it should voice their opinion, other than the developer.
Melanie Reynolds indicated that the Family Mart and Publix Shopping
Centers are always crowded, and was in favor of this new shopping
center, because it was necessary for the City to have a tax base.
Anna Kolber, an owner at Academy Hills, was in favor of medical and
office buildings.
Mayor Falck closed the discussion to the public.
C/W Kelch said that Council was aware of an excessive amount of B-6
zoning in the City, but it was a useful and flexible category. She
indicated.__her._.r.ecent�ugg.esti which included doctors,sn-t4s,
optical and stationery stores, and so forth. C/W Kelch felt this
would permit a more marketable situation for the developers, without
offering objectionable features. She requested denial of this re-
zoning, at the present time, by the City Council, and so MOVED.
V/M Massaro said B-1 is intended for neighborhood business, and felt
that the people do not want this, and SECONDED the motion to deny.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
30. Tro ical Gardens Nurser - 7910 University Drive - Rezonin Request -
B-6 to A-1 - Petition 11-Z-80 - Temp. Ord. #762 - First Reading.
(Lyons Commercial Subdivision #3 - Lot 11, Block 11).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled for receipt of
information from Applicant's Attorney.
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #762.
Bernard (Buddy) Himber, the owner of Tropical Gardens Nursery, said
that he was seeking a rezoning from B-6 to A-1, Agricultural Limited
Use, for the one (1) acre, or 100 by 350 feet approximately, which
adjoins the two pieces of property, which is presently zoned A-1.
In response to the Vice -Mayor, as to the purpose of this rezoning,
Mr. Himber stated that the Levitt Home project in Palm Beach County,
consisting of 2,000 homes, requires materials in gallon and 3 gallon
sizes. He said this rezoning would permit additional agricultural
growth, and permit supplies to be stored. He stated that no buildings
will be erected on this property, but would include clearing of the
land, and installation of a cyclone fence.
Mr. Himber said that he pays a large amount of taxes to the City,
and felt that the aesthetics from McNab Road north to the Family
Mart and Sunflower Shopping Center, is not desirable. He indicated
that he paid to have the fields bush -hogged to the south and north,
in order to have University Drive and his business look reasonably
nice. He felt that the property could go to B-1 rather than B--6,
which was very restrictive, and has created empty stores and businesses.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public.
Harry Steinfeld, the owner of the lot being requested, did recommend
a B-1 zoning be given with limited agricultural use, which would retain
the tax base,
V/M Massaro said that B-1 was more restrictive, and something could
be up -graded and not down -graded.
C/M Disraelly said that the problems in 1978,relating to Mr. Himber,
involved the fact that under B-1 zoning, the property could not be
-16- 5/14/80
mr/
� � r
used for agricultural purposes. He said the Code was referenced, and
it was determined that the A-1 method was the only manner of procedure.
The proper method, he said, was to permit agricultural uses, with
rezoning through the Broward Land Use Plan for such use in commercial
areas, could be accomplished.
Florence Bochenek said that something was lost in what she was original-
ly seeking, as relates to beautification, at the time she moved into
the area.
Mr. Himber said they keep the grass cut in front of the nursery, and
moved the sign back, as requested by Council on University Drive. He
said it was his intention to bring in twelve (12) large Royal Palms,
with four in front of ea.100 ft.sections,which would be roughly every
20 feet, and place Snow Queen Hibiscus in-between, and some low ground
cover, with railroad ties running each 100 feet, filled in with rock
behind it. He further added that the University Drive area is main-
tained by him, although it is not his responsibility, and was in-
terested in keeping the area maintained and in nice condition. Ile
also said there were no other businesses on that street, and Council
has never been presented with problems in the nursery. He noted that
the tax base has increased, rather than decreased, and is unimproved
land.
Mr. Himber said that his attorney addressed a letter to the City
Attorney, regarding the 43 feet right-of-way on Commercial Boulevard,
plus the limited access road that is involved.
C/M Disraelly and V/M Massaro both indicated they have not seen this
letter.
Mr. Steinfeld indicated that this was on record at the County, with
a 43 foot right-of-way and a limited access road.
Mayor Falck closed the discussion to the public.
V/M Massaro MOVED that the City Attorney await receipt of the letter
from Mr. Himber's Attorney, as relates to the dedication on University
Drive. She said this should be tabled until that time, and then re-
turned to Council, for their consideration.
Mr. Himber said that without legal opinion, he already covenanted
the new piece of property, with dedication of a portion of the property.
Mayor Falck felt that a determination has to be made by the City
Attorney, prior to approval and further consideration.
C/W Kelch SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
31. Phoenix Company - Rezoning Request - R-3 to B-3 - Petition #12-Z-80 -
Tem . Ord. #763 - First Reading. located on the south side of McNab
Road, 660 feet west of Nob Hill Road).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to 5/28/80 meeting
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #763.
Evan Cross, the City Planner, clarified the application, by stating
that the Planning Commission determined that B-2 was less intensive
than B-3, and would be appropriate zoning, which zoning was agreeable
to the developer.
Mr. William Zani, the Managing Partner of Phoenix Company, said they
originally recommended B-3, because it would be adjacent to existing
B-3 zoning. But, the Planning Commission, he said, suggested B-2
zoning, which would be more compatible, and was acceptable to him.
Mr. Zani displayed a site plan survey on the board, and indicated
the two particular sections of interest. He said the area involved
15 acres on McNab Road, which runs east - west, and Nob Hill Road,
running north and south. Mr. Zani said the original 11 acres was
zoned B-3 in 1970 by the owner, Mr. Feinberg. The southwest corner
-17-
5/14/80
mr/
of McNab Road and Nob Hill Road extends from 50 to 60 acres, and
was purchased by Mr. Friedman and a group of investors in 1972.
The four acres in question being rezoned from R-3 to B-2, is the
western most portion in this tract of land, he said, and extends
west of the B-3 zone and down to the- other property line. He added
that it was approved for commercial with the Land Use Plan of Tamarac,
and Broward County, which was under discussion for two years.
Mr. Zani said that Pheonix Company acquired this property in June
of 1979, which 15 acres will be closed at the time a building permit
is obtained. He indicated that the Land Use Plan for Tamarac states
over 35,000 people will be residing west of University Drive with
the current development. Lennar, he stated, made the largest home
purchase of 9 1/4 million dollars of a tract of land, that is within
1/2 mile of this particular shopping center. He also added that over
5,000 units will be developed and 10,000 people will be living there.
He further stated that Concord Village and others were provided for
in the plan, in a nicely laid -out sequence of residential and commer-
cial development. Mr. Zani said there was a proposed Publix coming
in on Pine Island Road and Southgate Boulevard, with a Winn -Dixie
shopping site by Phoenix Company on Nob Hill and McNab Road.
The extra four acres in this project, he said, which rezoning is
being requested from R-3 to B-2, and was approved in the Land Use
Plan, would not be an additional burden to the immediate neighbors.
Fie presented a display of the architect's drawing of the Isles of
Tamarac, in the northwest corner, and the shopping center outlines
in the southwest corner. Mr. Zani noted that the original 10-11
acres that were zoned B--3 since 1970, would be a development of 10-11
acres, but the commercial zone has been extended for an additional
four (4) acres in conformance with the Land Use Plan.
Mr. Zani indicated that the rezoning occurs 660 feet from the corner,
with the end of the shopping center being 225 feet east of the main
entrance of the center. He also noted that lots 40, 41, 42, 43 and
44 of the Isles of Tamarac are not developed and have not been acquired
by any individuals. These lots, he said, are involved in frontage
impact, and was certain that there were no houses built or lots sold
from lots 30 through 45. He stated there were houses built on lots 46,
6, 7, 8, 9, 11 and 15, which involves nine (9) houses in the immediate
area of this shopping center. The building line on N.W. 70th Avenue
does not permit access on McNab Road, and noted that from the first
building line in the shopping center to the single-family residences,
would involve 186 feet of distance. Mr. Zani further added there
would be 562 feet from building line to building line of Winn -Dixie,
and is the major store and traffic generator.
The people, he said, that are opposite on north side of N.W. 70th
Avenue, are 346 feet from their building line to the first building
line of the shopping center; with 722 feet to the Winn -Dixie -store.
He felt this shopping development would not place an additional burden
on the neighborhood, but would offer a convenience to the community.
He said the architect was attempting to develop a plan for screening
the Isles of Tamarac development from the shopping center, with land-
scaping the median strip which separates the north and south sides
of McNab Road.
Greg Darby said that the median was 18 feet, with left turn transi-
tions, which would be 8 to 12 feet at that point.
Mr. Zani displayed the architect's version of the landscaping, and
indicated that the adjacent land owners to the south and west of the
property, do not object to the development, including the developer
of Isles of Tamarac, the Glusmans. He discussed a six (6) foot high
wall which is the end of the backyard of the single-family residence,
and existing plantings; also, a large green space, which is the right-
of-way, and three lanes, that are all planned by the Department of
Transportation. Also, he said, the 18 foot median strip would be land-
scaped by the shopping center developer.
Mr. Zani said the south side of N.W. 70th Street would look at their
six (6) foot wall, plus their landscaping, and clusters of sabal palms
which he would enhance, along with a recommendation of jasmine plantings,
5/14/80
mr/
r � �
pampas grass between the clusters of Sabal Palms, and oleanders which
flower several times during the year. He also indicated if areas of
the median strip could not accept plantings, then they would propose
to offer plantings on the north side of McNab Road, putting in small
flowering trees between the wall sections, which would offer a higher
level view than the six (6) feet, breaking the over -view into the
shopping center.
Mr. Zani said the main entrance will have the savings and loan, with
attractive landscaping of hedges and trees. He said the 10 to 11
acres have been acquired, and will be.developed, whether or not the
four acres can be obtained. He also stated that over a quarter of a
million dollars has been invested to -date, and they would satisfy
two out of four goals of Tamarac's Land Use Plan. He quoted a portion
of the Land Use Plan; "the City should seek to eliminate strip com-
mercial development along major arterial roadways, by creating iden-
tifiable commercial, centers to serve the shopping needs of residents
and visitors to the City". He further stated that the 15 acre develop-
ment at the intersection of two major arteries, which provides con-
venient shops, with nicely landscaped shopping facilities, will elimin-
ate the need for strip commercial developments, and will be a clearly
identifiable center for the City.
Mr. Zani read another portion of the Land Use Plan; "the City should
attempt to create a supporting tax base for its residents for the
establishment of industrial and office parks, and commercial areas
as balance to the residential components". He further added that the
City has determined, after two years of study, and many public hearings,
that the location of McNab and Nob Hill Road, on the southwest corner,
would be an identifiable commercial center, of sufficient size, to
satisfy the needs of the residents of west Tamarac. Also, he said,
a second shopping center, on the corners of Pine Island Rd.and Southgate
Boulevard, has been determined to satisfy the needs of the residents,
of western Tamarac.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public.
Mr. Hirsch inquired whether areas of Tamarac could be kept suburban,
because he moved from 70th Avenue to 108th Avenue, with that thought
in mind.
Sam Schwartz, President of the Homeowners Association known as the
Isles Social Club, was representing the homeowners and residents of
the area. He said the association held a meeting, and voted against
the building of this commercial area shopping center, because it was
felt this would bring high incidents of crime and extreme traffic.
It was the feeling of the residents, he said, to maintain the area
as a clean and quiet neighborhood, and a resolution was passed at
this meeting, which would be an amendment to the Land Use Plan.
Milton Siegel, a homeowner of the Isles of Tamarac, said this major
shopping center would involve a Winn --Dixie store, two banks, a movie
theatre, office building and drug store, and would generate heavy
Tape traffic in the area. He felt that progress was okay, but the people
Side were more important. Statistics, he said, revealed that shopping
#5 centers were high crime areas.
Arthur Gottesman, a homeowner at the Isles of Tamarac, indicated that
he did not object to shopping centers, providing they service the
needs of a community. He felt the location of this center was "out -
of -order", which was zoned B-3 on the corner, and R-3,in 1972,.without
consideration of the future 10 years. He said his purchase of a home
in the area, was based on the fact that, at the most, a convenience
store might be built on this zoned parcel, and the people do not want
commercial industry at their doorstep. Mr. Gottesman stated that the
expansion of homes and population will be in the western area of
Tamarac, and felt that the need for shopping centers was along 77th
Street, between 88th Avenue and Nob Hill Road. He said that a survey
of 20,000 cars were estimated on a daily basis, upon completion of this
shopping center.
James J. Ephraim, of the Isles of Tamarac, indicated the fear of high
incidents of crimes, which large shopping centers have attracted, and
-19- 5/14/80
mr/
L
L __J
losing the peace
urged to deny the
Land Use Plan.
and quiet of the residential area. The Council was
rezoning from R-3 to B-3, and to amend the present
Harold H. Newman, President of Westwood 23 Association, expressed
his displeasure many times as related to gasoline stations, nursing
homes, funeral homes, water and skate -board slides, and particularly
items affecting the Westwood sections. He also became a keen observer
of the Land Use Plan developments, both at the County and the City
level. Mr. Newman felt there was great progress as to the growth of
Tamarac within the next few years. He appreciated the apprehension
of the people, as relates to another shopping center, because within
one month or two, a larger center involving 20 acres, will be erected
4/10 of a mile from his home, to be located on 88th Avenue, from
Southgate Boulevard to N.W. 81st Street. This large complex will house
the Publix Supermarket, K--Mart, a large chain drug store, and possibly
a cinema, with many other stores. Also, he said, an Exxon Gas Station
will be erected at the corner of Southgate Boulevard and 88th Avenue.
It was his opinion, that based on Tamarac's population of 35,000, plus
the increase of 20,000 persons, will be housed in the western area.
Mr. Newman said this shopping center,under discussion, was needed at
the present time, to serve as a diversionary measure, in order to
alleviate the impact of the shopping center in Westwood 23. He re-
quested Council to approve the rezoning request from R-3 to B-3.
Miriam Sandloafer of the Isles of Tamarac, is a one-year resident of
Tamarac,moving from a previous location in Hallandale, to establish
themselves in a suburban area. She felt they would be exposed to
noise and lights, and would appreciate the same consideration which
was given to Academy Hills.
Mort Student was against the building of this shopping center.
Florence Bochenek said that she lives diagonally across from the
newly planned shopping center, and would like Tamarac to remain beauti-
ful; leaving the decision to the wisdom of the City Council.
Rose Rosenberg and Isidore Goldstein both indicated there were adequate
stores and shopping in the City, and felt that the Publix shopping
center on Pine Island Road and Southgate Boulevard will be quite large,
and satisfy the needs of the people.
Moe Kanner of the Isles of Tamarac, inquired of Mr. Zani whether there
was any relation with Phoenix Company to the Pine Island Shopping
Center, and urgently pleaded that the City Council strike the eloquent
remarks, which did not relate to the Isles of Tamarac vs. Phoenix
development.
Ceil Schwartz said that a theatre in itself would involve problems
of ingress and egress from the shopping center.
Mr. Zani noted that it would be impossible for this shopping center
to generate 20,000 cars on a daily basis.
V/M Massaro recommended that action be tabled on this rezoning, in
order for Council to digest all the remarks, and MOVED to table this
item to the next regular meeting of May 28, 1980, and C/W Kelch
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
32. Gary Wishnia - Special Exception - Petition #13-Z-80 - Discussion
and possible action on a request to permit a gasoline service station
in a B-2 Zoning District at the southeast corner of Southgate Boule-
vard and University Drive. Temp. Reso. #1604.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled, with additional
input to be submitted by C/M Disraelly.
The -City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1604.
-20- 5/14/80
mr/
�. J
Michael Shiff Associates, Architects,representing the petitioner,
Gary Wishnia, said the special exception was being requested for a
service station to be erected on the southeast corner of Southgate
Boulevard and University Drive. He said this parcel was rezoned ap-
proximately one year previous,from B-6 to B-2, which would permit a
service station in this area. He displayed a conceptual site plan
on the board, and said the Planning Commission recommended approval.
Mr. Shiff said the plan indicated the access off University Drive,
and was one of the locations to be vacated, which had a planning
easement restricting the availability of curb cuts. This area would
have access to the service road, when University Drive is built to
its full width, he said. Mr. Shiff said they would adhere to all
the codes and ordinances of Tamarac, and will present preliminary and
final site plans, for Council and Planning Commission review.
Mr. Shiff said this station will have three or four service bays, with
the property being approximately 1 1/2 acres, or 290 feet deep, and
a few hundred feet wide. He said they would be adhering to all the
setbacks, and the islands within the station would have heavy land-
scaping, screening the station from Southgate Gardens. Also, he said,
there will be a wall separating the residential from the commercial
areas.
In response to a question by C/M Disraelly, it was stated by Mr.. Shiff
that Gary Wishnia has every intention of being the developer, but
.financing was involved.
In response to V/M Massaro, it was stated by Mr. Shiff that there is
a recorded plat, and 83 feet is the easement for future development
of service roads for University Drive; with the building not being any
closer than 83 feet.
Evan Cross, the City Planner, said there is a fee paid for a conceptual
site plan, which permits the City to be advised of any omissions or
deletions, and changes can be made prior to final review of the site
plan. The plat, he said, along University Drive, is a 10 foot planting
easement, and an 83 foot ingress non --vehicular access easement, running
for the entire length of the plat, or 93 feet, from Southgate Blvd. to
82nd Street, on the east side of University Drive. Within the 93 feet,
he said, and from the existing right-of-way line as shown, the City of
Tamarac would have 40 foot dedication requirements for the right--of-way,
plus the 50 foot setback off the street. The service road, he said,
would be within the 40 feet. He also stated that staff commented that
there were three ingress and egress points along the entire stretch
of property, from Southgate Boulevard south to 82nd Street; with one
being in the location of the driveway.
On further development of this property, he said, there would be a.
requirement of paving at the beginning of the access road to his
southern property line.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public.
Mort Student said he was informed that the station would have an
auto repair shop, and felt that competition was needed in the City.
Mayor Falck closed the discussion to the public.
V/M Massaro advised Mr. Wishnia that Council was not pleased with the
plan, due to the lack of beautification, and felt this would be a re-
quirement for special exception.
Mr. Wishnia said that he would agree to the Planning Commission
recommendations for beautification and landscaping.
V/M Massaro felt that prior to action by Council, that C/M Disraelly,
as a liaison member to Beautification Committee, discuss this with them,
as to an appropriate plan for the service station, and report back to
Council. She felt restrictions should be established for this.
Mr. Birken said there are two categories of special exceptions, and
read a portion of the ordinance pertaining to this.
MAC
5/14/80
mr/
C/M Disraelly said that restrictions have to be included for over-
night car and truck parking and storage on the outside of the station.
He indicated that residential areas were to the east, and Don Carters
Bowling Alley was located on the opposite side of the street. He said
many youngsters were in the area, and vehicles on the outside of the
station, parked on an overnight basis, would cause many problems.
He felt the total landscaped area has to be shown, and also the con-
sideration for the south side reverse flow road, with the position and
the paving involved.
Mr. Wishnia said that he agreed to bonding, as recommended by the Plan-
ning Commission.
C/M Disraelly said that he would be pleased to plan the berming or
handling of it on University Drive and Southgate Boulevard, and the
area within the wall.
V/M Massaro said that Mr. Birken was not comfortable with an "intent",
and said that C/M Disraelly, as liaison with the Beautification Com-
mittee, meet with them, and arrive at the beautification expected,
and bring back information and an appropriate document, which relates
to the access road; also, the required bond to be noted in the agree-
ment, and the revision of the sketch should show the access provision.
She said that the concept plan has to be corrected, in order to be
more meaningful to Council, and so MOVED. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
Mr. Wishnia said that he would beautify the station, but could not
give a particular time at this point for everything to be prepared.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Mr. Shiff indicated that he would advise Council when they are ready.
33. Elected Officials Terms of Office - Temp. Ord. #723 -- Amends Code
Section 2 by modifying the date which elected officials take office.
Discussion and possible action. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd Reading ORDINANCE NO.0- O v "� PASSED.
If
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #723.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public, and closed it because
there were no comments received.
C/M Disraelly said the purpose of this ordinance was to establish a
formal time for the swearing -in of elected officials, and MOVED for
the adoption of Temp. Ord. #723, on second and final reading, and
C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
34. Business Uses - Temp. Ord. #710 - Amending Code Section 28 by estab-
lishing restrictions on various types of businesses. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd Reading ORDINANCE NO.O- OV - 6a PASSED.
The City Manager read Temp. Ord. #710.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public, and closed it because
there were no comments received.
C/M Disraelly said that the title was self-explanatory, as to the
proposed changes, and MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Ord. #710, and
C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
35. Park and Recreation Site Acqui_sitio_n_ - Tem2. Ord. #742 - Amends Code
Section 20 relating to park and recreation lands in RD-7, R-3 and
R-4A zoning districts. Discussion and possible action. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to 5/28/80 meeting.
-22-
5/14/80
mr/
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #742.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public, and closed it because
there were no comments received.
V/M Massaro felt that this item should be tabled because of additional
work that is involved, because some of the projects were going into
very extensive recreation parcels; with proposals being required for
Council's consideration. She MOVED to table the item to the next regu-
lar meeting of 5/28/80, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
, 36. Code Supplement #4 - Temp.Ord. #752 - Discussion and possible action
to adopt the 4th Supplement to the Code of Ordinances. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd Reading ORDINANCE NO.0-149--42 PASSED.
VOTE:
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #752.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public.
Melanie Reynolds said that she objected to adoption of Supplement #4,
because it has not been properly researched. She said there were
ordinances in conflict and ambiguous, and were not proper. Ms.Reynolds
said the Charter has to be reworked.
C/M Disraelly felt the items should be submitted to Council in written
form, for their consideration, but the Charter before them is the
Charter of the City of Tamarac, and is valid. Fie said that a review
of the Planning Commission minutes could be accomplished, if they are
presented to him.
Mayor Falck closed the discussion to the public, because there were
no further comments received.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Ord. #752, on second
and final reading, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
37. Council District Boundaries - Temp. Ord.. #754 - Amends Code Section 2
by removing the codification requirement for the boundaries. Discus-
sion and possible action. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd Reading ORDINANCE NO.O- $'V",59 PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #754.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public, and closed it because
there were no comments received.
V/M Massaro MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Ord. ;#754, on second and
:final reading, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
38. City Council Regular Meetings - Temp. Ord. #755 - Amends Code Section 2
to conform with the Charter provision of the August recess. Discussion
and possible action. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd Reading ORDINANCE NO.O- 0Q ~�0 PASSED.
VOTE:
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #755.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public, and closed it because
there were no comments received.
V/M Massaro MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Ord. t#755, on second and
final reading, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
S#II
5/14/80
mr/
39. Woodmont - Tract 47 - Vacation of Easement - Temp. Ord. #757 - Dis-
cussion and possible action to vacate an entranceway easement to
this tract from the golf course. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Adopted on 2nd Reading ORDINANCE NO.O- pD 4 o /^ PASSED.
VOTE:
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #757, and indicated that it was not
an easement, but a dedicated right-of-way, which is corrected in the
title.
Mayor Falck opened the discussion to the public, and closed it because
there were no comments received.
s
Mr. Birken said the right-of-way was shown on the master plan, which
copies were distributed to Council.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Ord. #757, on second and
final reading, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
28. Police Chief Appointment - Report by City Manager, discussion and pos-
sible action.
IYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Appointment of
I?olice Chief Joseph Macintosh.
Mr. Gross indicated that a memo was distributed to Council, and noted
that numerous applications were submitted for the position. Also, he
said that a Review Board consisted of three Police -.Chiefs namely two
in Broward County and a former Police Chief residing in Tamarac. Fie
said out of ten applicants, three men have taken positions in other
cities, with two refusing, because of the length of travel, but five
men were interviewed.
The following top three men were named, Joseph Macintosh, Thomas Webster
and John Roche. His memo indicated his review of the three resumes,
and would recommend that Major Joseph Macintosh, of the Ft. Lauderdale
Police Department, be named the Police Chief of the City of Tamarac.
C/M Zemel said that members of Council received the background informa-
tion for Mr. Macintosh, but without indication of the manner of arriving
at this decision, and also no rating for the other police officers.
He felt there was no comparison that the City Council could make.
Mr. Gross said that the City Charter expressly states that the Police
Chief recommendation be left to the City Manager's discretion, and
said that the records are on file, and could be reviewed. Fie noted
that the technical points of police work were left to the judgment
of the Review Board, with the number one --choice being Joseph -Macintosh.
C/M Disraelly said that he reviewed the reports of the oral examina-
tions that were performed by the three Chiefs, and felt that the re-
sults were fairly close as to independent observations. He stated
that a discussion was held with one of the Chief's who performed the
oral examination. C/M Disraelly added that John Roche has done an
outstanding job in the Department and for the City, especially as
Acting Chief. He further stated that based on review of the examina-
tions, and his conversation with Chief Markham, it was indicated that
top priority would be for an Administrative Officer, due to problems
within the department. He, therefore, MOVED that the recommendation
of Joseph Macintosh be approved by Council, as Police Chief of the
City of Tamarac, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
V/M Massaro said that she would not disapprove the nomination, pro-
viding there is a one-year probation period, because there is a need
for a positive reaction in the department. She said there is generally
a six-month probationary period for employees, but felt that a deter-
mination could not be made within such a short period of time.
24- 5/14/80
mr/
r
Mr. Gross said that a one-year probationary period is difficult,
because the benefits which accrue for an employee are established
after the six-month period. He said that a department head works at
the pleasure of the City Manager, and if the job is not performed
properly, and the City Manager does not do something about it, then
the City Council has the prerogative to remove the City Manager and
the individual involved.
He additionally stated that John Roche has been with the City for
some length of time, and has done a very good job, also stating that
the decision for this choice was quite difficult. Mr. Gross said he
is very well -liked, and the decision was not from a personal point
of view.
C/W Kelch said that her second to the motion indicated this gentleman
was outstanding, and the City of Tamarac was fortunate to gain someone
who has 24 years of experience, with recent experience in the realm
of administration.
Mayor Falck felt that the probationary period should be extended, if
possible. He said if the individual has the qualifications, then he
would not be adverse to this determination.
Tape C/M Disraelly said that his motion indicated Mr. Macintosh was a fine
Side administrative officer, but would not want to limit him from doing
#6 the job, because qualifications were being considered as top priority.
He further added that it was the City Manager's decision, and there
should be no strings attached.
V/M Massaro MOVED to AMEND THE MOTION, by stating that the probationary
period be for one-year, and does not include an extension of employee
benefits, and C/M Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: C/W Kelch
- Nay
C/M Zemel
- Aye
C/M Disraelly
- Nay
V/M Massaro --
Aye
Mayor Falck --
Aye
VOTE FOR THE AMENDED MOTION:
C/W Kelch
- Aye
C/M Zemel
- Aye
C/M Disraelly
- Aye
V/M Massaro
- Aye
Mayor Falck
- Aye
Joseph Macintosh, a Tamarac resident, accepted the appointment of
Police Chief, and thanked the City Council for their confidence.
He said his record indicated 25 years with a fine and professional
Police Department, and would administer the Tamarac Police Department,
in the same manner as Ft. Lauderdale. It was his feeling that the
professionalism would be reflected in the performance of the rank and
file police officers. Mr. Macintosh said that he did not have any
qualms as relates to the Vice -Mayor's amendment, and was a firm be-
liever in a probationary period. He further added that "he who does
not belong, and is not competent, should go".
Mr. Macintosh said that he heard some very fine things about Lt. John
Roche and Lt. Sam Joseph, but has not had direct contact with them.
He said if everyone works together, it could be one of the finest
Police Departments in the country.
LEGAL AFFAIRS
45. Setback Requirements - Temp._ Ord. #751 - Amending Code Section 28-49
by reducing rear yard setback requirements in R-2 zoning districts.
Discussion and possible action. First Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved on 1st Reading.
The City Attorney read Temp. Ord. #751.
-25--
5/14/80
mr/
C/M Disraelly said that he was the proponent of this particular ordi-
nance, and advised the City Attorney that there were no more RD or R-2
districts left in the City. But, he said, a situation has arisen in
Academy Hills, which was and is an R-2 district. The developer, he
stated, came into the City in 1972 with a site plan, which noted some
homes with a 15 foot setback, and others with 25 foot setbacks. The
site plan, he said, showed an envelope for each of the apartments,
with a 15 foot setback.
On October 11, 1972, an ordinance was passed, he said, changing the
rear yard setbacks from 15 to 25 feet, with site plan approval by
Council on November 8, 1972, and was approximately one month after
passage of the ordinance. As a result, C/M Disraelly said that all
these homes were built with a site plan permitting 15 feet, but the
ordinance still required 25 feet. This situation involved a zoning
change, and many people were "non --conforming"; and was similar to
a situation that was handled in the Woodlands approximately one month
previous.
He, therefore, requested that the ordinance be changed, which would
put the rear setback conforming to 15 feet, because it involved three-
quarters of the homes. He indicated that the sale of any of these
homes would involve a problem, because theoretically all of the homes
were built in violation, for that period of time. Because, he said,
the site plan took one year to process, and the site plan was signed -
off four weeks after the ordinance was changed, the building was per-
mitted to continue.
C/M Disraelly further added that the homes have a line of Australian
Pines to the north, and the property to the south is B-6 zoning, with
residential beyond this. He additional stated there was no other.
undeveloped R-2 zoning in the City.
V/M Massaro said this could be approved on first reading, and further
researched prior to second reading
Evan Cross said that on 88th Avenue, directly south of the City Hall
parking, on both sides of the street, there is R-2 zoning, to which
C/M Disraelly indicated that this information differed from what
Mr. Cross previously told him.
V/M Massaro then recommended that action be tabled, to which C/M
Disraelly said the situation has been created, which permitted people
to build. He said Ordinance 72-06 indicates 15 feet, and 0-72-39
changed it to 25 feet.
Mr. Birken said that RD-7, which was passed within the past 1 1/2 years,
shows the same density as R-2, and has many identical regulations.
RD-7, he said, has a rear setback of 15 feet,which is presently being
requested for one --story buildings, and 20 feet for two -stories.
V/M Massaro MOVED for approval on first reading, and C/W Kelch
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
51. Commercial Plaza - Sign Waiver - Temp. Reso. #1594 - Discussion and
possible action on request to install one additional directory sign
for this shopping center.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: C/M Disraelly requested to
check the sign, and if appropriate by ordinance,
the applicant is to install the names.
Arnold Klein represented the Commercial Plaza, and said there was
approximately 520 foot lineal frontage. He added that there was an
existing sign at the south -end of the Plaza, and people approaching
the shopping center,are beyond it, after reading the sign. He said
there is also an identification sign, which exists, and would request
-26-
5/14/80
mr/
permission to have the tenants insert their names on this sign.
V/M Massaro felt the second sign should be identical to the other
sign, because names being inserted at the bottom would not be legible.
C/M Disraelly advised that Mr. Klein appeared before the Beautification
Committee previously with the proposed sign; also presenting another
sign approximately one or two years previous. It was indicated to
him, C/M Disraelly said, that the sign was irregular, with the sugges-
tion that the second sign be installed, which would be similar to the
first one. This Plaza, he said, was on 441, just north of Sambos,
with the directory sign located at the south end. In July of 1977,
the Beautification Committee anticipated that Council would approve
two directory signs, one at the north and the other at the south end;
but Mr. Klein did not return until recently. C/M Disraelly said that
a new sign was discussed, which the Beautification Committee indicated
would require presentation to Council. He said the ground sign change
was being requested at that time, but the Committee felt that he would
not have a ground sign.
It was the recommendation of the Beautification Committee, he said, to
have a second directory sign at the north end of the Plaza, instead
of destroying the ground sign. Furthermore, he said, a directory
sign has to be raised six feet above the ground, by ordinance, for
visibility of automobiles approaching this area. It was C/M Disraelly's
suggestion that Mr. Klein come in with a sign to be placed at the north
end of the property, and leave the ground sign in the present location.
Mr. Klein said that the identification sign is 50 feet from the north
side of the Plaza, and could be elevated to a six (6) foot opening.
He also said there is are 8X10 foot boards where the signs could be
mounted, and has been in existence since the Plaza was built. This
was requested by him approximately two years ago, and was north of the
second entrance. He indicated that he received a permit for this in-
stallation, but was presently requesting the names of the tenants be
inserted.
C/W Kelch inquired whether there was adequate room for the six (6)
foot elevation, and still permit the names to be inserted, to which
Mr. Klein replied in the affirmative. He said this was refused by
the Beautification Committee, for the insertion of the names, and has
been in existence for the past six years.
C/M Disraelly said that he would view the signs.
V/M Massaro MOVED that C/M Disraelly be authorized to view the sign,
and if it conforms with the ordinance, then the applicant be permitted
to insert the names; if not, then the item should be called again for
consideration. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
56. Woodmont - Tracts 55 and 61 - Bond Release -- Temp. Reso. #162.1 - Dis-
cussion and possible action to release a warranty Letter of Guarantee
posted by Toll Development.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) Bond Release -Adopted, RESOLUTION NO.R-,& Z /PASSED.
and b) AGENDIZED BY CONSENT - Temp. Reso.
#1625 -- Water & Sewer Improvements - Tract 55 - RESOLUTION NO.R-Q -1 PASSED.
Adopted; also, Ten . Reso. #1626 - Tract 61 -
Adopted. RESOLUTION NO.R- Q -?Aa PASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1625, and V/M Massaro MOVED for
its adoption, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1626, and V/M Massaro MOVED for
its adoption, and C/M Disraelly SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
-27-
5/14/80
mr/
L --1
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1621.
V/M Massaro said the bill of sales have been submitted, and the City
Engineer has approved the required work. Also, the list given to
Mr. Toll for three specific items, has been corrected, she said, and
then MOVED for the adoption of Temp. Reso. #1621, authorizing the
release of the Warranty Letter, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
LEGAL AFFAIRS
44. Occupational License Ordinance Amendment - Tem . Ord. #753 - Amending
regulations pertaining to jewelry businesses. Discussion and possible
action. First Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved on 1st Reading,
as amended.
C/M Disraelly read Temp. Ord. #753, and said this was discussed under
businesses, and was noted that the concept of the jewelry business
differed from previous years, because gold and silver is purchased
for exchange of various items. It was previously discussed, he said,
that a separate license would not be required if the business has an
appropriate occupational license, and would be included in a regular
fee, for both jewelry dealers and jewelry and watch repairing. He
additionally stated this came forth due to the opening of the Jewelry
Exchange.
He said that C/M Zemel addressed a memo to him, with the determination
that the proposed ordinance did not require changes, and so MOVED for
the adoption of Temp. Ord. #753 on first reading. C/W Kelch SECONDED.
C/W Kelch inquired whether the fees were reviewed as to the present
requirements, to which C/M Disraelly replied in the affirmative, and
stated that one-half of the year has passed, and felt that the changes
will be in effect with the next year's occupational license.
Mr. Birken said the effective date of the ordinance should be 9/30/80.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Sol Robinson, in behalf of the merchants at the Jewelry Exchange, on
McNab Road and University Drive, felt they were in agreement that
rebates should not be given on this license, but to take effect on the
next renewal.
42. Broward Count - Mosquito Control Pro ream - Tema. Reso. #1620 - Dis-
cussion and possible action to approve an agreement for aerial spraying
operations.
SYNOPSIS OF _ACTION: Adopted
RESOLUTION NO.QPASSED.
The City Attorney read Temp. Reso. #1620.
Mr. Gross said approval of this resolution permits flying over the
area for mosquito control spraying, at a height of 500 feet, without
charge to the City, because it is part of the County program.
C/M Disraelly MOVED for approval, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
53. Riverside Memorial Chapel - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Site Plan
b) Landscape Plan
c) Plat - Temp,-Reso. #1615
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to reconvened meeting
of 5 21 80 pending Developers Agreement.
Ina
5/14/80
mr/
Mr. Birken said there is a Water and Sewer Developers Agreement,
and the City was not informed of this on the Agreement of Purchase
and Sale with the Utility,. The Utility, he said, was obligated to
inform the City of agreements which would be assumed. A list was
given to the City, he stated, but this particular agreement was not
designated. Mr. Birken said the assets of the Utility were purchased,
and those things that were spelled out, but did not assume the res-
ponsibility for the Corporation, and any breach of contract, was not
the problem of the City.
He said if Riverside wants to seek relief from Tamarac Utilities, Inc.,
that avenue is open to them, but the City Attorney's office did not
have any knowledge of this Water and Sewer Developers Agreement.
A representative of Riverside said that as prerequisite of submitting
plans to the City, for preliminary review, approximately 12 to 14
months previous, there was a requirement for submission of proof from
the Utility Company as to service capacity. At the time that the
Preliminary Plan was submitted, he said, a letter was also given from
the Utility, which approval was given by the City; also, acceptance
on the final plan, because the Developers Agreement did not have to be
executed, because of the commitments.
Mr. Birken said that commitments were one thing, and a valid Water and
Sewer Agreement was another. Fie reiterated that it was not on the list
given to the City.
Morris Simon, the Architect for Riverside, said that the City requested
him to get the connections, and, in turn, they were informed of the
results. If, he said, an audit was performed, their name would appear.
In order to further the application, Mr. Simon said they did everything
the City requested.
V/M Massaro said that she would not honor this Developers Agreement,
because she found that only one check was paid, and Tamarac Utilities
returned additional monies to Riverside, which check copy was retained
by the Utility. She said their argument was with the old Tamarac
Utilities, but not with the City, and they will be required to submit
a Developers Agreement before action can be taken on the site plan.
Mr. Simon said that he will inform his client.
Mr. Birken reiterated that their "gripe" is with Tamarac Utilities,Inc.
because they have Riverside's money, and did not notify the City of
an existing agreement.
V/M Massaro MOVED to table this item until that time that Riverside
Memorial Chapel submits a Developers Agreement, for the Wednesday,
May 21st, 1980 meeting, and C/W Kelch SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
MEETING WAS RECESSED TO MONDAY, MAY 19, 1980, AT 9:00 A.M.
i� MAYOR
ATTEST:
ASS'T.�CITY CLERK
This public document was promulgated at a cost of $ % �. /, or
per copy, to inform the general public and public o ficers and employees
about recent opinions and considerations by the City Council of the City
of Tamarac.
-29- 5/14/80
mr/
APPROVED BY
CITY COUNCIL
L,ONo t.4L. // ?o