The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-09-26 - City Commission Regular Meeting MinutesLJ P.O. BOX 25010 TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33320 FIRST CLASS MAIL CITY OF TAMARAC CITY COUNCIL REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING THURSDAY. SEPTEMBER 26. 1985 CALL TO ORDER: 9:00 A.M. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF TIME ALLOCATIONS - MOTIONS TO TABLE - The Chair at this time will announce those items which have been given a specific time to be heard, and will entertain motions from Council members to table those items which require research. Council may agendize by majority consent matters of an urgent nature which have come to Council's attention after publication. AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS 1. Employee Service Awards - Presentation by Acting City Manager Perretti of five-year pins to Patrick Cummings, Mike Fazio, Ronald Holt and Stephen Melnick, Police Department, Vincent Velt, Utilities West, John Cezard, Purchasing; a ten-year pin to Russell Rosen, Police Department, Terrence Focks, Fire Department; and a fifteen -year award to Albert Mortimer, Police Department. 2. Employ the_Handicap ped - Announcement by Mayor Kravitz of presentation of a proclamation designating the week of October 7, 1985, as "National Employ the Handicapped Week". BOARDS AND COMMITTEES 3. Planning Commission - Temp. Reso. #3777 - Discussion and possible action to appoint one 1 alternate member. 4. Board of Adjustment - Temp. Reso. #3778 - Discussion and possible action to appoint one l)alternate member. 5. Welcoming Committee - Discussion and possible action on: a Acceptance of resignation of Yetta Robbins b) Announcement of one vacancy on this committee 6. Investment Advisory Committee - Report by the Chairman. Discussion and possible action. CONSENT AGENDA 7. Items listed under Item #7, Consent Agenda, are viewed to be routine and the recommendation will be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. If discussion is desired, then the item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 09/26/85 pg. 3, pres- entations were made by Acting City Mgr. 09/26/85 pg.3 Mayor annouced "Nat...." see Da. 3 for more 09/26/85 pg.7 TABLED 09/26/85 pg.7 TABLED till 10/9 meeting 09/26/85 pgs . 7 - 8 A) Accept. B) Announced 85 pgs. 4 - 5 Report Given_ 09/26/85 pgs . 8 & 9 APPROVED items a) through e) and g); REMOVE and then APPVD f) a) James M. Montgomery, Consulting following invoices for services utility rate study with funds to Services Account 425-366-536-310 Director: 1) Invoice 52961 - $1,504.00 2) Invoice 54295 - 5,640.00 b) James M. Montgomery, following invoices as 1) Invoice 55175-D - #428-368-535-662 2) Invoice 55175-A - #425-368-535-310 - 3) Invoice 55175-C - #428-362-536-620 - 4) Invoice 55175-E - #428-362-536-620 - PAGE TWO 9/26/85 Engineers, Inc. - Approval to pay the in connection with performing a come from Utilities Professional as recommended by the Finance Consulting Engineers, Inc. - recommended by Engineering: $194.17 - TUW Odor Abatement Approval to pay the Program Account $643,40 - TUW Professional Services Wastewater Treatment Plant $422.12 - TUW Renewal & Replacement TUW Office Building $123.20 - TUW Renewal & Replacement TUW Office Building Account Account Account c) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. _ Traffic Engineering Study - 6/30/85 - $7,048,16 - Payment #4 - Building Professional Services Account 001-179-519-310 - Approval recommended by Consultant City Planner. d) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Consulting Engineers - Approval to pay the following invoices for the TUW Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Project 84-4 from the TUW SSES Account #432-367-538- 626 as recommended by the Utilities Director/City Engineer: 1) Project 1724-01, Statement 1 - $ 4,323.30 2) Project 1724-01, Statement 2 - 21,380.59 e) CH2M Hill - Approval to pay the following invoices for the Deep Injection Well Effluent Disposal System, Project 84-2, from the TUW Bond Issue Construction Fund Account #434-506-598-318 as recommended by the City Engineer: 1) Invoice 06-404 - $16,671.27 2) Invoice 06-436 - 15,492.98 3) Invoice 06-440 - 2,226.63 4) Invoice 07-457 - 860.00 f) Tamarac Park Recreation Building - Approval to remove the following items from the agenda (tabled from 9/11/85): 1) Revised interior and exterior plans 2) Payment of invoice in the amount of $3,316.95 to Anchorage Air Conditioning for purchase and storage of units 3) Council's interest in All Saints Lutheran Church, which is for sale, for use as a combination community/recreation center. g) Mobil Service Station (west side of 441 at Commercial Boulevard) Platting Waiver - Approval to remove this item from the agenda (tabled from 7/24/85) GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL 8. Tamarac Park Recreation Building - Discussion and possible action on a Council concerns regarding this building (tabled from 9/11/85) b) Payment of Invoices 41413 and 41270 to Sheridan Lumber, Inc., totalling $429.14, from Satellite Recreation Construction in Progress Account #344-761-572-650 9. Municipal Complex - Discussion and possible action on authorization to charge architectural expenses as a loan against the General Obligation Bond proceeds instead of charges to the General Fund (tabled from 9/11/85) 1 1 09/ 26/ 85 pg. 16 A) Auth. Bob Jahn to rcv bids. B)APPVD 09/26/85 pgs. 9 - 11 TABLED tit 9 / 3 0 meeting PAGE THREE 9/26/85 10. Pension Plan - Discussion and possible action on payment of the following invoices with monies to come from the Pension Fund: a) Muller, Mintz, Kornreich, Caldwell, Casey, Crosland & Bramnick, P.A.: 1) May and June, 1985 invoices in the amount of $2,981.10 2) July, 1985 invoice in the amount of $1,504.44 b) Facciani & Company invoice in the amount of $445.50 dated 8/19/85 (tabled from 9/11/15, 11. Waste Management, Inc. - Temp. Reso. #3781 - Discussion and possible action to approve the Second Addendum to the contract for residential and condominium garbage collection. 12. Lot Clearing Fees - Temp. Reso. #3782 - Discussion and possible action to amend the rates being charged for clearing of vacant lots by City personnel in accordance with Section 11-13 of the Code. 13. Pines West Triathlon - Discussion and possible action to grant permission to use a portion of Tamarac roadways east of State Road 7 for a bicycle race on 9/29/85 sponsored by the Oakland Park/Wilton Manors Chamber of Commerce. 14. Draina a Improvement Program - Discussion and possible action to authorize James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc., to perform a study of flooding in the Boulevards Section (tabled from 6/12/85) 15. Broward League of Cities Business - Discussion and possible action. 16. Northwest Council of Mayors Business - Discussion and possible action. TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST 17. Utilities West - Transmission Facilities - Northwest Force Main/Pump Station Project 84-5 - Discussion and possible action to approve a contract with CH2M Hill to perform work on this project (tabled from 2/13/85) 18. Utilities West - Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project 84-4 - Temp. Reso. #3776 - Discussion and possible action to approve Payment #4 to Interstate Pipe Maintenance, Inc., in the amount of $32,948.65. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 2:00 P.M. 19. Mobil Oil Corporation - Rezoning Petition #12-Z-85 - Temp. Ord. #1219 - Discussion and possible action to rezone the lands at the southwest corner of Commercial Boulevard and State Road 7 from B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to B-3 (General Business). Second Reading. a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Posting. b) Consideration of application. 20. University Community Hospital - Rezoning Petition #17-Z-85 - Temp. Ord. #1220�- Discussion and possible action to rezone lands at the rear of the Hospital property, extending approximately 336.7-feet west of the west property line of the Hospital, from R-4A (Planned Apartments) to B-6 (Business District), utilizing the 5% flexibility rule for commercial development in residential land use area not to exceed 10 acres. Second Reading. a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Posting. b) Consideration of application. 09/26/85 pgs. 11 & 12 TABLED A) & B) 09/26/85 pgs. 38&39 TABLED 09/26/85 pgs. 12 & 13 TABLED til 9/30 meeting 9 13 APPROVED 09/26/85 pgs. 17 -- 19 TABLED 09/26/85 p19 re ort 41ven 9 p19 report given 09/26/85 p19 TABLED 09/26/85 pgs. 20 & 21 APPROVED 09/26/85 pgs. 27 & 28 TABLED til 10/23 meeting 09/26/85 pgs 28 - 30 TABLED til 9/30 meeting 21 PAGE FOUR 9/26/85 Dinerstein Builders - Rezoning Petition #18-Z-85 - Temp. Ord. #1212 - 09/26/85 Discussion and possible action to rezone the proposed site for the pg. 30 cabana and pool area for Boardwalk Apartments on the north side of A) ACCEPTED NW 61 Street between NW 84 Terrace and NW 88 Avenue from R-4A (Planned B) APPROVED Apartments) to S-1 (Open Space/Recreation). First Reading. on 1st read. a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of Mailing and Affidavit of Posting b) Consideration of application 22. Dinerstein Builders - Rezoning Petition #19-Z-85 - Temp. Ord. #1213 - Discussion and possible action to rezone the proposed site for the clubhouse for Boardwalk Apartments on the south side of NW 61 Street between NW 84 Terrace and NW 88 Avenue from R-4A (Planned Apartments) to S-1 (Open Space/Recreational). First Reading. a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of Mailing and Affidavit of Posting. b) Consideration of application 23. Nunzio and Maria Osso - Special Exception Petition #20-Z-85 - Temp. Reso. #3767 - Discussion and possible action to grant a special exception to permit on -premises consumption of beer and wine at Nunzio's Italian Restaurant proposed for Bay 44 of Tamarac Market Place, 10012 West McNab Road, which is zoned B 3 (General Business). 24. Tamarac Utilities West - Temp. Reso. #3765 - Discussion and possible action to establish and modify certain water and sewer service rates and charges applicable to customers west of State Road 7. 25. Tamarac Utilities East - Temp. Reso. #3766 - Discussion and possible action to clarify categories of water and sewer service rates and charges applicable to customers east of State Road 7. LEGAL AFFAIRS 26. Albert Miller vs. City of Tamarac - Discussion and possible action on payment of the City's insurance attorneys (tabled from 9/11/85) 27. City Attorney Professional Services - Discussion and possible action on payment to the law offices of Alan F. Ruf for consulting attorney and City prosecution services and transfer of funds from Contingency to fund these invoices (tabled from 9/11/85) 28. Charter Board - Discussion and possible action on a request from the Charter Board that they be designated the responsibility of transmitting Charter amendments to the Secretary of State (tabled from 9/11/85) 29. ESM Litigation - Discussion and possible action on payment of the latest invoice from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius. 30. Fences, Walls and Hedges - Temp. Ord. #1214 - Discussion and possible action to amend Article V of Code Section 6-44 by removing the 7--foot setback restriction for corner lots on side streets in residential districts..First Reading. 31. Broward County Annexation Proposal - Temp. Reso. #3783 - Annexation Report by the City Planner concerning land east and west of Shaker Village. Discussion and possible action. 09/26/85 pg. 31 A) ACCEPTED B) APPROVED on 1st read. 09/26/85 pgs. 25 & 26 APPROVED w/conditions 09/26/85 pgs. 31 - 33 TABLED til 9/30 meeting 09/26/85 pgs. 33 - 37 APPVD reso. 1 09/26/85 pg. 39 TABLED 09/26/85 pgs. 23 & 24 APPROVED 09/26/85 pgs. 13 - 16 TABLED 09/26/85 pgs. 41 & 42 APPVD to Dav 09/26/ pg. 42 TABLED 09/26/85 pgs. 24 251 APPROVED A 1-1 PAGE FIVE 9/26/85 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 32. Mobil Oil Corporation (Southwest corner of Commercial Boulevard and State Road 7) - Tem . Reso. #3768 - Discussion and possible action on a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants. 33. University Community Hospital - Temp. Reso. #3769 - Discussion and pos- sible action on a Declaration of Unity of Title. 34. Amoco Oil Com an Southeast corner of Commercial Boulevard and State Road 7 - Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso. #3775 - Discussion and pos- sible action on a revised site plan reflecting two new pump islands and four dispenser units. 35. NW 57 Street - S-Curve at Commercial Boulevard - Discussion and pos- sible action on: a) Vacation of a portion of NW 57 Street right-of-way, Petition #3-V-85- Tem . Ord. #1215 b) Acceptance of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions - Temp. Reso. #3784 36. Tamarac Nursing Center _ Discussion and possible action on: a Amendment to the Special Exception granted on 1/9/85 to permit construction of a 180-bed facility at the Tamarac Nursing Center on the west side of NW 79 Avenue, north of NW 57 Street - Temp. Reso. #3779 b) Developers Agreement 37. Woodmont Tract 50 - Discussion and possible action on: a Easement and Option Agreement - Temp. Reso. #3780 b) Model Sales Facility 38. Woodmont Model Sales Facility at Tract 56 - Discussion and possible action to renew a model sales permit pursuant to Stipulation #11 for Woodmont Tracts 47, 50, 54, 57, 60, 70, 71 and 72B (tabled from 9/11/85) 39. Woodmont Tract 59 - Temp. Reso. #3770 _ Discussion and possible action to approve Stipulation #24 concerning development of this property. 40. Woodmont Tracts action on: 74/75 - Performance Bonds - Discussion and possible a) Calling a performance bond posted for public with Site Plan #5 - Temp. Reso. #3773 b) Calling a performance bond posted for public with Site Plan #6 - Temp. Reso. #3774 improvements associated improvements associated 41. Program Underwriters Building - Performance Bond - Tem Reso. #3772 - Discussion and possible action to call a bond posted for public improvements. 42. Lake Colon Brookwood Gardens) - Discussion and possible action on: a Renewal of a Lease Agreement with Bay Colony Property Company, Inc., for use of the facilities at this project for certain City -sponsored recreation activities - Temp. Reso. #3757 b) Status of traffic light bond (tabled from 9/11/85) 43. Homeowners Warranty - Bond Release - Temp. Reso. #3771 - Discussion and possible action to release a bond posted for construction defects for a home located on Lot 5, Block 3 of Heftler Homes. 09/26/85 pg. 37 TABLED til 10/23 meet. 09/26/85 pg. 38 TAB. til 9/30 meet. 09/26/85 pgs. 25 & 26 APPVD w/ conditions 09/26/85 pg. 1 TABLED till 10/9 meeting 09/26/85 pgs. 21 - 23 TABLED 09/26/85 pg. 26 APPROVED A) and B) 09/26/85 pg. 11 TABLED til 10/9 meeting 09/26/85 p43 REMOVED from agenda 09/26/85 p43 REMOVED from agenda O9/26/85 p43 APPROVED 09/26/85 pgs. 5 - 7 A) APPROVED B) TABLED 09/26/85 pgs. 43 & 44 APPROVED PAGE SIX 9/26/85 REPORTS 44. City Council 45. City Manager 46. City Attorney PUBLIC HEARINGS - 5:05 P.M. 47. Fire Access Lanes - Temp. Ord. #1174 - Discussion and possible action to amend Chapter 15 of the Code to provide a penalty for parking in or obstructing fire access lanes and to amend Chapter 18 to provide specific requirements for these lands. Second Reading. 48. Off Street parking Requirements - Temp. Ord. #1205 - Discussion and possible action to amend Section 18-5(13) of the Code to provide for more restrictive parking requirements for indoor athletic clubs and gymnasiums. Second Reading. City Council may consider and act upon such other business as may come before it. Pursuant to Chapter 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. CITY OF TAMARAC '� e ao'l-re" Carol E. Barbuto Assistant City Clerk PUBLIC HEARING Monday, September 30, 1985 - 6:00 P.M. - Budget Public Hearing - Council Chambers Following are the residential and commercial zoning districts in the City: A-1 - Limited Agricultural A-5 - Agricultural/Excavation B-1 - Neighborhood Business B-2 - Planned Community Business B-3 - General Business B-5 - Limited Business District B-6 - Business District I-1 - Institutional M-1 - Light Industrial M-2 - Medium Industrial R-1 - Single Family Residence R-lB & R-lC - One Family Dwelling R-2 - Two Family Dwelling R-3 - Low Density Multiple Dwelling R-3U - Row House R-4A - Planned Apartment R-5 - Motel/Hotel RD-7 - Two Family Dwelling RM-5 - Residential Multi -Family Dwelling RM-10 - Planned Apartment S-1 - Open Space/Recreational T-1 - Trailer Park District 09/26/85 no report 09/26/85 no report 8 no report 09/26/85 pg. 44 APPROVED 09/26/85 pgs 44 & 45 APPROVED 1 I PAGE SEVEN 09/26/85 TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST 49. Sewer Use Ordinance - Temp. Ord. #1216 - Discussion and possiBle action. BOARDS AND COMMITTEES 50. Public Information Committee - Announcement of Vacancy - Discussion and possible action 51. Beautification Committee - Announcement of Vacancy - Discussion an possi e action. LEGAL AFFAIRS 52. En�--aRement__-.of Profe-ssiona.l..Services to. Handle The Steve Wood Lawsuit - Discussion and possible action. GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL 53. Land Section i - Land Purchase - Financing - Discussion and possible action 09/26/85 pg. 1 agend. by Con. see pg.39 09/26/85 pg. 1 Agen. by Con. see p40 09/26/85 pg. 2 Agen. by Con. see p40 09/26/85 pg. 2 Agen, by Con. see D40 09/26/85 pgs. 2 & 3 Agen. by Con. see pg. 40 CITY OF TAMARAC CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 1985 TAPE CALL TO_QRDER: Mayor Kravitz called the meeting to order at 1 9:00 A.M. on Thursday, September 26, 1985, in Council Chambers. PRESENT: Mayor Philip B. Kravitz Vice -Mayor Helen Massaro Councilman Arthur H. Gottesman Councilman Raymond J. Munitz Councilman Sydney M. Stein ALSO PRESENT: Acting City Manager Larry Perretti City Attorney Jon Henning Assistant City Clerk Carol E. Barbuto Secretary, V. Diane Williams MEDITATION AND_.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Kravitz called for a Moment of Silent Meditation and the Pledge of Allegiance. TAMARAC UTILITIBB WEST 49- ew s O d'n nce - Tem . d 1216 - Discussion and Possible action SYNOPSIS F ACTIO e Pa 3.9 Agendized by consent V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent the Sewer Use Ordinance. SECONDED by C/M Stein. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE -COXMUNITY qKyB1DpMENT 35. Nw 5 reet - S-Cugve_at Cnmmercial,.._Eaugy=Vd Discussion and possible action on: a) Vacation of a portion of NW 57 Street right-of-way, Petition #3-V--85 - T O d. #1215 b) Acceptance of Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions - Temp. gesn-3784 SYNOPSIS OF ACTIO : TABLED to the next regular meeting (10/9/85) to allow petitioner to meet with the City Attorney to create an agreement. V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE until the next regular meeting, 10/9/85, to allow the petitioner to meet with the City Attorney to create an agreement. She wanted it understood that she was not objecting but that there was too much that has not been addressed. SECONDED by C/M Stein. VOTE: L TE 'E ROAARD5-,._ANDC MMITTEE 50. Publi_P form"ti n Co m'ttee - nn unc nt c nc -- Discussion and possible action SYYNOO 2 OF' ACTION: ,_(N_e_P�gg Agendized by Consent V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent the vacancy on the 1 9/26/85 /vdw `f Public Information Committee. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. VQTE : ALL VOTED„ AYE AWARDS_ AND PRESENTATIONS 2. Employ the Handicapped - Announcement by Mayor Kravitz of presentation of a proclamation designating the week of October 7, 1985, as "National Employ the Handicapped Week". a) Announcement by Mayor Kravitz of presentation of a pro- clamation designating the week of September 17 - 23 as "Constitution Week". YS NOPSIS OF ACTION: (See Page 3)_ a) Agendized by Consent V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent the proclamation for "Constitution Week". SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE BOARDS AND COMMITTEES 51. Beautification Committee -- Announcement of Vacancy - Discussion and possible action SYNOPSIS_OF ACTION: (See Page 40 ) Agendized by Consent C/M Munitz MOVED to Agendize by Consent the announcement of vacancy as an alternate for the Beautification Committee. SECONDED by C/M Stein. VOTE: ALL VOTED_AYD LEgAb AF AIRS 52. Engagement of Professional, Services to Hand e_,The_Steve_Wood Lawsuit - Discussion and possible action SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: 15ee_Pacret 4C11 Agendized by Consent V/M Massaro MOVED to Agendize by Consent authorization for Alan Ruf to handle litigation regarding the Steve Wood Lawsuit because of the City Attorney's heavy workload. She also asked that Mr. Ruf be per- mitted to use Mr. Gronda's services when and if necessary. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE It GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVELFINANCIAL 53. Land Section7 - end Purchase - Financing - Discussion and possible action YNOPSIS OF ACTION: wee Page 40) Agendized by Consent V/M Massaro MOVED that the financing for Section 7 land purchase be 2 9/26/85 /vdw Agendized by Consent. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE• AIL YDTED AYE AWARDS AND _PRESENTATIONS 1. E ployee Service Awards - Presentation by Acting City Manager Perretti of five-year pins to Patrick Cummings, Mike Fazio, Ronald Holt and Stephen Melnick, Police Department, Vincent Velt, Utilities West, John Cezard, Purchasing; a ten-year pin to Russell Rosen, Police Department, Terrence Focks, Fire Department; and a fifteen -year award to Albert Mortimer, Police Department. SXNQF51S OF ACTT N: Presentations were made by the Acting City Manager Acting City Manager Perretti made the following presentations: Five-year pins to: Patrick Cummings, Mike Fazio, Stephen Melnick, Police Department; Vincent Velt, Utilities West Ten-year pins to: Russell Rosen, Police Department Terrence Focks, Fire Department Fifteen -year pin to: Albert Mortimer, Police Department The following employees were not present to receive their five-year pins: Ronald Holt, Police Department and John Cezard, Purchasing. 2. E the Handic d - Announcement by Mayor Kravitz of presentation of a proclamation designating the week of October 7, 1985, as "National Employ the Handicapped Week". a) Announcement by Mayor Kravitz of presentation of pro- clamation designating the week of September 17 - 23 as "Constitution Week". SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Mayor Kravitz announced the week of October 7, 1985 as "National Employ the Handicapped Week". a) Mayor Kravitz announced the week of September 17 - 23 as "Constitution Week" Agendized by Consent on Page 2. Mayor Kravitz announced the proclamation designating the week of October 7, 1985 as "National Employ the Handicapped Week". He informed that the proclamation will be mailed to the appropriate parties because they were not present at the meeting. a) Mayor Kravitz announced the proclamation designating the week of September 17 -23 as "Constitution Week". He stated that the pro- clamation will be mailed to the appropriate parties because they were not present at the meeting. 3 9/26/85 /vdw BO__ARDS A D COM ITTEE 6. Invest ent dvi_�ory__CQmmittee -- Report by the Chairman. Discussion and possible action. HYNOPSTS OF ACTION: Report was given by Dr. Alfred Wald. The City Attorney to prepare necessary legislation to implement committee's recommendations. The following item includes a verbatim of Dr. Wald's report: For the record, I am Dr. Alfred Wald and I'm a member of the Investment Advisory Committee of the City of Tamarac. Mayor Kravitz, Vice -Mayor Massaro, members of Council and other interested parties, the Investment Advisory Committee was authorized by an ordinance on April 10, 1985, and I am here today to make a preliminary report of our committee's activities. As the name implies, the committee can only function in an advisory capacity. In order to be able to advise the City Council about investment programs, we've had to go back and check the securities that are now owned by the City. The Committee has not concerned itself with the reasons why and by who investments were made in the past; we are only interested in what securities we now have and how to best invest this money safely in order to get the maximum return in the future. I am sure that the Council received a financial report of September 13, 1985 (this is what I have in my hand here ). This report breaks down into three parts: short term, short-term of ESM now under litigation and the long-term investments that the City has. The Investment Advisory Committee is concerned with the physical possession, the location and the quality of the City investments. In checking the long-term securities, we found that the longest investment of a million dollars was to the country of Zimbabwe out to the year of 2012. The committee was very apprehensive about this loan and our first recommendation was to sell this security. I am happy to report that this security has been sold and the proceeds have been invested in a million dollar, two --year Treasury note. The Committee is in the process of trying to accumulate infor- mation of the remaining long-term investments. We would like to check the current market value and see if we are getting a fair return for our money. When we are in possession of all the pertinent information, we will, then, try to evaluate the best course of action for each of the securities and give the Council our recommendation. The Committee has discussed the entire investment procedure in the City. The problem caused by the possible ESM loss of seven million dollars has alerted us to the weakness in the City's investment program in the past. We believe that a good deal of the difficulty we now have stems from the 1981 Ordinance 0-81-33 known as the "Disraelly Ordinance". The Committee recommends that this ordinance be revoked and that the authority for investing City funds revert back to the City Council with the understanding that in the future the Council follow the policies dictated by the City Charter regarding investments. A new set of procedures should be instituted for all future investments. Council approval should be mandatory. Legalities should be confirmed by the City Attorney. At least two signatures should be necessary for pay- ment. And, the City should receive physical possession of the 4 1 I i 9/26/85 /VDW / LJ 1 investment documents or get bank -guaranteed receipts for these documents. The receipts of the transactions covering purchase casts, registration numbers, cusip numbers, and all the pertinent information as to the purchase should be kept in accessible safekeeping location by the City. In conclusion, the Committee likes to think that in the short time we have been in office we have started a rebirth of the investment philosophy of the City. The Committee would also like to thank our liaison member, Mayor Kravitz, for his full cooperation in obtaining information and his getting the City accountant to address our committee. Everyone in the City has been most co-- operative. Frank Etheredge, our new and very busy Finance man, has been most helpful in trying to provide us with the information we request. I would finally like to thank the City Council members for allowing me this opportunity to address them on behalf of the Investment Advisory Committee. Thank you. End of Verbatim Mayor Kravitz stated that based on the resolution passed, the terms of the Investment Advisory Committee members expire November 11, 1985 and asked the Assistant City Clerk to make a note for the next PreAgenda to include this item for discussion for reappointment to the committee. V/M Massaro expressed gratitude to the committee for the work they have done and are still doing. Mr. Henning informed that he will await instructions from Council if they wish him to take any action based on the recommendations of the Investment Advisory Committee. Mayor Kravitz said that as liaison he hoped that Mr. Henning would prepare the resolutions based on their requests and submit them to Council as soon as possible whereby they can act accordingly. V/M Massaro MOVED that any resolutions or ordinances that might be necessary as a result of the report given by the Investment Advisory Committee be implemented and that the City Attorney do that post-haste. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALL VOTED_NYE 42. Lake Q9lQny (Brookwood Gardens) - Discussion and possible action on: a) Renewal of a Lease Agreement with Bay Colony Property Company, Inc., for use of the facilities at this pro- ject for certain City -sponsored recreation activities - Reso. #3757 b) Status of traffic light bond (tabled from 9/11/85) SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) APPROVED Temp. Rgso. #3757 with request for signed copy of lease extension. Resolution No. R-85-296 PASSED 5 9/26/85 t /VDW Y OP I-$ OF ACTION: (CONT'D) b) TABLED to allow the City Engineer time for additional research for a firm determination and submission of memo with recommendations no later than the second regular meeting in October. a) Mr. Henning read Temp. _2eso #3757 by title. The City Attorney explained that approximately one year ago the City entered into a one-year lease with Lake Colony Condo to use their recreation facilities for indoor activities, and he under- stood that it has worked well. Mr. Henning said the rent was $250.00 per month and the City was not paying for utilities nor janitorial services but they were trying to be good neighbors by keeping the place as well kept as possible. He said it was hoped that the Tamarac Recreation Satellite would be on line and the activities taking place at Lake Colony could be moved to the Recreation Satellite. However, since it is not completed, Mike Cuozzo, Public Works Director, and the Acting City Manager recommended that the lease be extended for another six months at the same rate and the same terms. Mr. Henning said there is a sixty-day cancellation. Mr. Perretti said he recommended the extension and informed that he investigated to determine the number of people who are presently utilizing the club. He said, in the past, when the bridge club had tried to use the facility, they were bumped. He said this club meets twice a week with attendance numbering 130 each time. V/M Massaro asked if this was a private club. Mr. Perretti answered that it was not a private club but part of the Parks and Recreation Program. V/M Massaro asked if there was anyone else using it besides the bridge club and was informed that there were others utilizing the facilities. C/M Stein MOVED the APPROVAL of Tem eso. #3757. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. V/M Massaro asked that they be provided with a signed copy of the lease extension. Mr. Henning said there is a provision in the lease for coordination with the representatives of the building and the City as to schedules, hopefully, to avoid any cancellations. Vickie Beech, resident, asked how this would affect the City's liability. V/M Massaro answered that the City has coverage. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 6 9/26/85 /VDW V/M Massaro informed Ms. Beech that there is no additional cost for liability. b) V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE to allow the City Engineer additional time for research to make a firm determination and submit a memo to Council with his recommendation not later than the second regular meeting (10/23/85). She said this traffic light may or may not be necessary in the future. Mr. Robert Huebner, attorney, said the bond has been up since 1980 and stated that a couple of weeks longer to make sure the City feels comfortable with the situation would not harm them any more. He commented that the bond was switched from the traffic light to a punch list of items that they had to accomplish and they have submitted backup indicating its completion. Mr. Huebner felt they are in a position to have the bond returned but out of due respect to the City four weeks would be acceptable. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VQTE : ALL VOTED _AYE BOARDS AND COMMITTEES 3. o 'ss'on - Temp. Reso. #3277 - Discussion and possible action to appoint one (1) alternate member. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED to a future meeting at the request of Planning Commission Chairman Bender. Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso, 43777 by title. Mayor Kravitz informed that he had received a telephone call from Chairman Larry Bender asking that this item be tabled for a future meeting. V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE for a future meeting. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. YQTE: ALL VOTED AYE 4. Board of Adjustment - Temp. Reso.#3778 - Discussion and possible action to appoint one (1) alternate member. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED to next regular meeting (10/9/85) Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3778 by title. V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE to the next regular meeting. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED -AYE 5. Welcoming Committee - Discussion and possible action on: a) Acceptance of resignation of Yetta Robbins b) Announcement of one vacancy on this committee Y P F A TIO : a) ACCEPTED resignation of Yetta Robbins; City Clerk instructed to write Letter of Appreciation. b) Vacancy announced a) C/M Stein MOVED the ACCEPTANCE of the resignation of Yetta Robbins. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. C/M Gottesman stated that the MOTION should be AMENDED to read that the resignation is ACCEPTED with great reluctance as she has 7 9/26/85 /VDW done a wonderful job. Mayor Kravitz suggested that the MOTION include that a Letter of Appreciation be sent by the City Clerk's Office. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE b) Mayor Kravitz announced a vacancy for this committee. V/M Massaro MOVED the ANNOUNCEMENT of a vacancy for the Welcoming Committee. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 7. CON5ENT, AgENDA a) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. - Approval to pay the following invoices for services in connection with performing a utility rate study with funds to come from Utilities Professional Services Account 425-366-536-310 as recommended by the Finance Director: 1) Invoice 52961 - $1,504.00 2) Invoice 54295 - 5,640.00 b) James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. -- Approval to pay the following invoices as recommended by Engineering: 1) Invoice 55175-D - $194.17 - TUW Odor Abatement Program Account #428-368-535-662 2) Invoice 55175-A - $643.40 - TUW Professional Services Account #425-368-535-310 - Wastewater Treatment Plant 3) Invoice 55175-C - $422.12 - TUW Renewal & Replace- ment Account #428-362-536--620 - TUW Office Building 4) Invoice 55175-E - $123.20 -- TUW Renewal & Replace- ment Account #428-362-536-620 TUW Office Building c) Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. - Traffic Engineering Study - 6/30/85 - $7,048.16 - Payment #4 - Building Professional Services Account 001-179-519--310 - Approval recommended by Consultant City Planner. d) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Consulting Engineers Approval to pay the following invoices for the TUW Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Project 84-4 from the TUW SSES Account #432-367-538-626 as recommended by the Utilities Director/City Engineer: 1) Project 1724-01, Statement 1 - $ 4,323.30 2) Project 1724-01, Statement 2 - 21,380.59 e) CH2M Hill - Approval to pay the following invoices for the Deep Injection Well Effluent Disposal System, Project 84-2, from the TUW Bond Issue Construction Fund Account #434-506--598-318 as recommended by the City Engineer: 1) Invoice 06-404 - $16,671.27 2) Invoice 06-436 - 15,492.98 3) Invoice 06-440 - 2,226.63 4) Invoice 07-457 - 860.00 f) Tamarac Park Recreation Building - Approval to remove the following items from the agenda (tabled from 9/11/85): 1) Revised interior and exterior plans 2) Payment of invoice in the amount of $3,316.95 to Anchorage Air Conditioning for purchase and storage of units 3) Council's interest in All Saints Lutheran Church, which is for sale, for use as a combination community. recreation center. 8 9/26/85 /VDW � 1) g) Mobil Service Station (west side of 441 at Commercial Boulevard) Platting Waiver - Approval to remove this item from the agenda (tabled from 7/24/85) SYNOP Z 0 ACTION: APPROVED Items a) through e) and g); REMOVED and then APPROVED f) C/M Gottesman asked that Item f) be REMOVED. V/M Massaro MOVED the APPROVAL of Items a) through e) and g). SECONDED by C/M Stein. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE f) C/M Gottesman referenced 3 under f), whereby he felt that sufficient thought, study and review had not been given to this building as a possible adjunct to the Satellite Building. He felt that the Tamarac Recreation Satellite need not be completed but that the All Saints Lutheran Church be employed instead since it is already a completed building and, with a minimum of cost, can be adapted as a Council Chamber. He said it would hold more seats, the acoustics are better and there are rooms for staff meetings, etc. Tape Mayor Kravitz explained that this item could come up again and, 2 if it is passed, it will be approval to remove it from the agenda. V/M Massaro recalled that at the Pre -Agenda Meeting they discussed that leaving this on the agenda puts the City in a bad position and removing it from the agenda does not stop anyone from pursuing it. She said she does not want the seller to think that they are overexcited. C/M Gottesman MOVED that Item f) be REMOVED from the agenda. SECONDED by V/M Massaro. VOTE• ALL VOTED AYE 9. Municipal Complex - Discussion and possible action on authorization to charge architectural expenses as a loan against the General Obligation Bond proceeds instead of charges to the General Fund (tabled from 9/11/85) �$,YVOPOIS OF ACTION: TABLED to Monday's reconvened meeting (9/30/85) at which time another item will be added for Council's approval of the working drawings City Attorney Henning informed that they had discussed this at previous meetings and felt that the conclusion of Council was that it is a good idea to charge some number of dollars as a loan against the General Fund to be recovered when the bonds are sold. He said with the present status of their architectural services, it has been a problem to determine whether or charged or whether a lesser dollar servative but certainly defensible 9 not the full value should be figure that would be more con - from the City's viewpoint. 9/26/85 /VDW ��/ Frank Etheredge, Finance Director, stated, based on previous discussions, that there is an approximate total of $162,050 which applies to the first three phases and if Council accepts them, they could capitalize and state that the money would be repaid by the bond issue. Mr. Henning said that is a conservative approach defensible by the auditors and the City. He said there was a concern that some of the working drawings would not be utilized but has not been determined at this point even though it seemed to be the direction in which they were headed. C/M Stein remarked that if they do not use the plans he could not see why they should not be used against the bond issue. Mr. Henning said he had a similar thought because his initial feeling was that the full amount, approximately $300,000, be charged as a loan. He said they have not changed the contract nor finalized the negotiation and until there is something definite that could be altered next year which could include a forgiving of the loan to a degree, there was adequate funding in this year's budget to pay for all of it. He said they are trying to create surplus to be carried over to next year. Mr. Henning said he understood that if a decision is made to charge it against the General Fund next year that it is not budgeted next year to do that. C/M Stein said he would like to have a motion that states that all monies expended and charged to the General Fund for the Municipal Complex be charged to the bond issue. V/M Massaro said there is nothing that states that they have to place the bonds right away; therefore, the money can be carried as a loan against the bond issue for the time being. She informed them of an opinion from Touche Ross that came in via telephone which read that Mark Wilson, Touche Ross, called in conjunction with the charging of the architectural expenses to the bond issue instead of the General Fund. Mark Wilson agreed this could be done; however, he said if the City scraps the Miller & Meier plans, the City could not charge the expenses to the bond issue which means that Item c under Section 2 could not be done. V/M Massaro said they are not scrapping the plans and are definitely going to keep Items a) and b) but the working drawings have to be scrapped. She inter-preted Touche Ross' opinion as stating that they cannot charge twice for the same thing. V/M Massaro said who completed the working drawings remained to be seen after negotiations with Miller & Meier and urged that they not charge anything to the bond issue that might be doubtful. C/M Munitz said they were "muddying the water" by not charging the entire amount because no matter how much may or may not be useable when the final plans come in, the total amount that has been paid out should be charged against the bond proceeds. He said the letter from Touche Ross basically alerted them to the fact that they can not charge twice the same type expenses against the bond issue. C/M Munitz said that the money has been spent and charged against the General Fund and he believed that the total amount should be shown as a receivable. If, at any time, it is found that part of that should be or would be a proper charge against the General Fund, at that time it can be charged against an unappropriated surplus. C/M Munitz stated that from year to year, in order to get a complete picture of financial transactions within a fiscal year, it would be most proper to include the total amount of architectural fees to keep the entire matter clear. Frank Etheredge explained that Touche Ross indicated that any part of the plans that are to be used would be a recoverable cost. He 10 9/26/85 /VDW said if Council accept the first three phases of Miller & Meier's work, it can be charged but if the construction drawings are scrapped, Council cannot charge twice for the same thing. C/M Munitz said at this point it is not known what is going to be scrapped. While Council members may have their own personal opinions, there has been no action to indicate it. C/M Gottesman said even though Council has not formally asked that question they have had workshops where there have been indications from the majority of the Council. V/M Massaro said everybody was right and suggested that they agendize for Monday's meeting the working drawings. She suggested that it be TABLED for further review. V/M Massaro MOVED that this item be TABLED to Monday, 9/30/85, and that the working drawings be placed on the agenda for Council's approval. V/M Massaro also directed Mr. Henning to prepare whatever is needed for Monday's meeting so that Council can make a firm determination on the working drawings. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED_AYS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 38. Woodmont Mom Sales Facility --at Tract 56 - Discussion and possible action to renew a model sales permit pursuant to Stipulation #11 for Woodmont Tracts 47, 50, 54, 57, 60, 70, 71 and 72B (tabled from 9/11/85) SYNOPSIS OF ACTIO TABLED to next regular meeting (10/9/85) V/M Massaro explained that she had not reviewed Stipulation 411; therefore, she could not act on it and asked that the item be TABLED to the next regular meeting. She said they could use the permit until Council reaches a decision. Kay Parenti, Woodmont Corp., said the permit expired September 15. Assistant City Clerk Carol Barbuto injected that the permit was extended to today's date. V/M Massaro explained that they are now extending it to the next regular meeting. Ms. Parenti asked what the problem was in Council's not renewing the permit today. V/M Massaro said she did not know if there was a problem. Mr. Henning clarified that typically models are on the site where they are sold, and Woodmont has a central sales office which was provided for as part of a stipulation and explained that Council has requested time to refresh themselves with all the details of the stipulation. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VO E AYE GENERAL ADMINISTRATVEZFINANCIAL 10. Pension plan - Discussion and possible action on payment of the following invoices with monies to come from the Pension Fund: a) Muller, Mintz, Kornreich, Caldwell, Casey, Crosland & Bramnick, P.A.: 1) May and June, 1985 invoices in the amount of $2,981.10 2) July, 1985 invoice in the amount of $1,504.44 11 9/26/85 / /VDW / b) Facciani & Company invoice in the amount of $445.50 dated 8/19/85 (tabled from 9/11/85) ,SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED a) and b) to allow City Attorney to conduct investigation of Pension Plan Mayor Kravitz reported that Stephen Melnick informed the Pension Board regardless of what the Pension Fund earns, if monies are expended, the City must reimburse them. Mr. Henning said he was under the impression that the City has to make a contribution in order to fund the Plan and the Plan has to meet the scrutiny of the actuaries every year. He said the City contributes six percent and a fraction to help fund the Plan and the employees also make a contribution. Mr. Henning explained that if the actuary determines that the Plan is underfunded, then the six percent may have to be raised or a lump sum payment made for expenses. He understood that if the Pension Plan was adequately funded by its own investments that the City would not have to subsidize it. C/M Stein MOVED to TABLE until the City Attorney can investigate the report and give them his opinion of the report. V/M Massaro asked that the MOTION be extended to include all information on the Pension Fund and how it works to include the stocks they are buying and if they lose money on them, if the City has to reimburse it. She said she also wanted to know if the City has to give that percentage and if the Pension Plan can be rede- signed. Mayor Kravitz expressed concern with the investments and reported that he had received a list of the Pension Board's approximately 30 to 35 investments and that about 20 of those at the present time were showing losses. He said Council should direct their questions as to whether to change the Pension Plan or to amend it. V/M Massaro added that Council needs to know what can be done from a legal standpoint. Mr. Henning asked for clarification as to whether Council wanted him to expend additional monies for professional services to get the answers requested. Mayor Kravitz recalled that a question was raised and passed by the Pension Board that the Charter Board member or their dele- gate should not be a voting member and asked Mr. Henning to research it and determine if it affected the Charter in any way. V/M Massaro said that if Mr. Henning's investigation reveals that the City has to pay these expenses, then Council has to give serious consideration to their position as to changing the Pension Plan. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE C/M Munitz suggested that Mr. Henning check as to what the constraints are. 12. Lot ClearinFees - Temp - R__go,, #3782 - Discussion and possible action to amend the rates being charged for clearing of vacant lots by City personnel in accordance with Section 11-13 of the Code. $YNOPSI�S OF ACTION: TABLED to Monday's reconvened meeting (9/30/85) Mr. Henning read Temp. P so._#37,82 by title. 12 9/26/85 /vdw The City Attorney explained that the City Code provides, when necessary, after notice to the owner if there are violations, the work crew necessary to clear the lots or bid it out and charge the owner, and if necessary, lien the property to collect the charges. He said the Public Works Department has been very overworked and it has been brought to Council's attention that the authorized rates should be based on an overtime schedule. Mr. Henning said the men are willing to do the work but it does not fit into the forty -hour week work schedule. Therefore, the property owners would be compensating the employees at the overtime rate instead of regular time and having the City pay them overtime to do the other city work. He said this resolution would revise the rates that are already in effect. V/M Massaro said that the $180 per lot does not work out for smaller lots because travel time is not included and stated areas abutting sidewalks would have to be edged. She stated that a cost of $95 per hour has been formulated to be charged for lot clearing and added that a breakdown was provided. V/M Massaro suggested that if Council has not had enough time to study the breakdown that the item be TABLED to Monday's reconvened meeting and Mr. Henning would have to amend the ordinance. Mr. Henning injected that no matter how small the lot is it is a minimum $180. V/M Massaro said that workers cannot get to a site, do the work and return to Public Works within two hours. She said the City is not in the lot clearing business and if the people took care of it themselves, the City would not have to do it. V/M Massaro MOVED that the item be TABLED to Monday and that it be examined carefully. Vickie Beech, resident, said that it has been two years since some of the lots have been cleaned and she does not understand the laxity because this is revenue that the City is losing. SECONDED by C/M Stein. .yQTE : ALL VOTED AYE LEGAL AFFAIRS 28. � dit r Board - Discussion and possible action on a request from the Charter Board that they be designated the responsi- bility of transmitting Charter amendments to the Secretary of State (tabled from 9/11/85) ):NDPSZS_OF ACTION: TABLED for a future meeting. Melanie Reynolds, Aide to the Charter Board, reported that she has given Council copies of examples of how, over the years, the Charter has been mishandled. She said it has been allowed, through the City Clerk's Department, to become "the creature of Codifier" and stated that the Charter Board is concerned. Ms. Reynolds said her report is not against the person of the City Clerk nor for the Charter Board but said it is for the Charter and the rights of the people whose laws are contained within the Charter. She said, traditionally, it has been the Charter Board's duty to take care of the Charter which includes amending, re- vising, as well as rewriting it, and stated that it was the Charter Board's request that this duty be returned to them. Mayor Kravitz said the City Attorney should be involved so that he may advise Council of any necessary action. Mr. Henning recalled that they had discussed in the past certain requirements under the Florida Statutes to send the amendments to the Secretary of State and designated the governing body, which is Council, to carry out these duties. The City Attorney said Council had, in their backup, Letters of Transmittal indicating 13 9/26/85 % /vdw ✓ that when the questions were passed and the election results were certified and accepted, they were sent to the Secretary of State along with the printed supplements. Ms. Reynolds said she was not referencing the letters because they were of no interest except that the Charter Board had requested copies and did not receive them. Mr. Henning said he was not prepared to respond as to whether or not there was a problem indicated in the exhibits that he did not receive back in 1977 or 178. Ms. Reynolds said there were no exhibits in 177 or 178. Mr. Henning said the bottom line is that Council can direct the City Clerk's Office, which is Council's staff, to act. He said the Charter Board takes their job very seriously and was sure that they felt they are responsive to the public. The City Attorney stated that they have two-year terms and, if they do not do their jobs right, they will not be reelected. Mr. Henning said this was an administrative job which he felt could be capably handled through the Clerk's Office. He informed that if Council wants to make a change, he would prepare the legislation. Mayor Kravitz said he did not believe that they were talking about election or change but about what the law is and the proper way to go. Mr. Henning said the law stated that Council should see that the amendments get to Tallahassee and Council has to determine if it has happened that way in the past and if the present system is adequate. C/M Munitz said that the City Council is the agency to send the Charter Amendments to the Secretary of State. He said even though Ms. Reynolds indicated that there was nothing personal in the request, he felt it would be an indication that the City Clerk has not done her job properly since she was given the responsibility by the City Council according to State Statute. Ms. Reynolds asked when she was given this authority. C/M Munitz referenced a memo that Council designated the Clerk to handle the amendments. Ms. Reynolds said the City Clerk also maintained that she was given this designation but that she has nothing in writing. C/M Munitz asked the City Attorney if Council has authorized, at any time, the City Clerk to handle the Charter amendments. Mr. Henning replied not in the approximately three years that he has been with the City but it was a procedure that has been going on prior to his arrival. He added that if they want a resolution to formalize that he could prepare one. Mr. Henning felt there should be a document clarifying the situation once and for all. C/M Munitz felt it would be appropriate to TABLE the item until they have a document. Mr. Henning answered that he does not know what to write unless Council directs him. C/M Munitz said he would be more comfortable with the City Clerk performing that responsibility since she is, hopefully, a permanent employee of the City whereas members of the Charter Board may come and go as the electorate sees fit. He said he felt that a resolution authorizing the City Clerk to fulfill this responsibility on behalf of the City Council was in order and stated he would like to make such a MOTION. C/M Stein said he has not seen any charges against the Office of the City Clerk and referenced the State Statute as giving the 1 14 r 9/26/85 /vdw governing body the authority to see that the amendments get to Tallahassee to the Secretary of State. He said the arm delegated to get the amendments, to the Secretary of State is the Office of the City Clerk, and he saw no reason why this should change. C/M Stein stated, for the record, that Ms. Reynolds has complained to at least five or six official bodies in Tallahassee and locally and has been "told off" by every one of them that she is wrong in her quoting. He said if she wanted him to, he would produce the records although he is not ready. C/M Stein felt the Statutes are correct and that Mr. Henning wanted to reinforce them by specify- ing the City Clerk as the person to send the amendments and stated that he did not think that a MOTION is necessary. He suggested they leave it that way until someone produces evidence to the contrary. Tape V/M Massaro said she has heard several times dates mentioned 3 when the documents were filed and they were certainly not at the appropriate time. She said she had received a lengthy memorandum from Marilyn Bertholf, City Clerk, apparently in response to the item on the agenda. V/M Massaro said nowhere in the memo were there dates of the actual filings and requested them so that Council has something to review. C/M Stein said a motion to table is proper. V/M Massaro said it is proper provided Council received the infor- mation so they can see what has happened in the City Clerk's Office and if the amendments have been filed at the proper time. Mayor Kravitz asked C/M Munitz to withdraw his MOTION and he did SO. Mr. Morris Haber, Chairman of the Charter Board, stated that there was no attempt to denigrate the Office of the City Clerk but an attempt to make it more efficient. He said the Charter Board as designated by the Charter to care for the Charter should prepare all the aspects of the Charter for the best interests of the Charter. He said they should think of the Charter Board in terms of an institution and not as being individuals. Mr. Haber said the Charter Board is continuous whether a person does or does not get elected. He requested that the Charter Board be given the responsibility of transmitting the amendments to the Secretary of State. Mr. Haber said he has discussed this with the City Attorney many times that this has not been done and cited March 12 to July as the dates that the amendments had not been put into law because the Secretary of State had not been notified. Mr. Haber said because of this, the amendments were not enforced; therefore, they had a Charter that had been elected and defended by the referendum but they were still not acting in accordance to the Charter. V/M Massaro said that dates and infractions have been mentioned. She said Tamarac's one City and the Charter Board is part of it and that there should not be division. V/M Massaro reiterated that she wanted all the information as to when the documents were filed and when they should have been filed. Ms. Reynolds advised that V/M Massaro has everything including the correspondence and the way, throughout the years, the Charter has been mishandled up to this year. She said there were two errors this year. Ms. Reynolds said this information showed that the Charter Board did not get the copies as requested. V/M Massaro said the file that Ms. Reynolds submitted to her would be forwarded to the City Attorney. C/M Stein MOVED to TABLE the item. SECONDED by V/M Massaro. C/M Gottesman requested that Council be furnished with proper dates and the length of time that it takes a piece of paper to move from the Charter Board to the City Clerk's Office to the State Department. He said the City Attorney should submit a written report to establish certain guidelines for the future. 15 9/26/85 / /vdw V V/M Massaro said the MOTION did not include everything that she wanted because she asked for a report from Melanie Reynolds as to dates when the City Clerk should have transmitted the amendments. Mayor Kravitz injected that the TABLING is for a future meeting. VOTE: ALL -VOTED -AYE GENEBAL.ADMINISTRATIVEZFINANCIAL 8. Tamarac Park Recreation Building - Discussion and possible action on: a) Council concerns regarding this building (tabled from 9/11/85) b) Payment of Invoies 41413 and 41270 to Sheridan Lumber, Inc., totalling $429.14, from Satellite Recreation Con- struction in Progress Account #344-761-572-650 SYNOPSI$,OF ACTION: a) AUTHORIZED Bob Jahn to receive bids for asphalt roof and, together with Acting City Manager to have roof in- stalled at an upset price of $5,000.00 b) APPROVED payment of invoices 41413 and 41270 to Sheridan Lumber, Inc. a) V/M Massaro asked Mr. Jahn had he received any quotes for the asphalt roof. Mr. Jahn reported that he had sent her several recommended changes. He said the metal roof, as shown on the plan, was estimated at $19,900 and is subject to being dented very easily by any baseballs from the ballfield, and it was his recommendation that Council change the metal roof to an asphalt roof and to use a good asphalt shingle which will give a shadow effect. The Chief Building Official said he asked for three prices and had received one for under $5,000 which would mean a savings of approximately $14,000. He said the other two bids were not in but asked Council to consider changing from the original roof material to the asphalt and he will report back later with the remaining two bids. V/M Massaro said she wanted it brought to Council's attention because it is a major change and MOVED that Mr. Jahn be AUTHORIZED to receive bids for an asphalt roof for the Satellite Recreation Building in lieu of the one originally intended. C/M Gottesman SECONDED. VQTE: ALL VOTEP.AYE a) V/M Massaro asked if Mr. Jahn was authorized to proceed with it when he receives the bid because the roof should be covered with asphalt shingles or they will have deterioration of the building. Mayor Kravitz and C/M Stein indicated agreement. Mr. Henning asked if this price included parts and labor. The Chief Building Official said it included materials and labor by a licensed broker. V/M Massaro MOVED to AMEND the original MOTION AUTHORIZING Mr. Jahn, together with the Acting City Manager, to have the asphalt roof installed at an upset price not to exceed $5,000.00. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. Florence Bochenek, resident, stated that Mr. Jahn was a very capable person in judging and does not feel that he should be restricted to $5000.00 but should be given the privilege to proceed with what he considers the best bid. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 16 9/26/85 /vdw 1 Mayor Kravitz asked Mr. Jahn if he felt it could be finalized before Monday and if so, Council could agendize it for a report at Monday's meeting. b) Mr. Jahn recommended approval of Invoices 41413 and 41270. He said the material was purchased to complete and protect the roof. C/M Stein MOVED to AUTHORIZE Inc., totalling $429.14 from SECONDED by V/M Massaro. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE the payment to Sheridan Lumber, Progress Account #344-761-572-650. Mr. Jahn reported that Public Works closed the ditch and it is now safe and looks better. 13. Pines West Triathlon - Discussion and possible action to grant permission to use a portion of Tamarac roadways east of State Road 7 for a bicycle race on 9/29/85 sponsored by the Oakland Park/Wilton Manors Chamber of Commerce. EEYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED Acting City Manager Perretti informed that he had spoken with Captain Roche who indicated there was no problem in granting permission for use of a portion of Tamarac roadways. Mr. Perretti recommended Council's approval. C/M Gottesman MOVED to GRANT permission to use a portion of Tamarac roadways for the triathlon activity for September 29, 1985. SECONDED by C/M Stein. VOTE: ALL_VOTED AYE 14. Drainage Improvement P.ggggAm -- Discussion and possible action to authorize James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc., to perform a study of flooding in the Boulevards Section (tabled from 6/12/85) 9YNOP5919 OF ACTION: TABLED for a report and recommendation by the City Engineer Mr. James Collier, resident, said he has lived in the Boulevards for eight years and there has not been a decent storm that has not caused flooding. He said the community was built in 1966 and has been flooding ever since. Mr. Collier said there is an engineer- ing problem that has been there since its inception. Mayor Kravitz told him that he had encountered a similar situation in his home and added that the City is investigating. He said the study, if approved, would be for the entire City. He asked the Acting City Manager to continue his investigation and give a report to Council. V/M Massaro stated that work has been done in that area since 1983 and explained that they are on a gravity system as opposed to the pumps for the west side. She said they are also very close to the county and that Broward County may have some responsibility, too. V/M Massaro said the first thing they need to do is to go back to the consulting engineers that have already made studies there and determine why it has not worked. 17 9/26/85 /vdw C/M Stein remarked, for the record, that one of the worst spots anytime it rains is 75th and 80th Avenue. V/M Massaro said it was unfair to judge by the last rain storm because there were six and a half inches of rain in one day. She said Tamarac's better off than any City in Broward County. Mildred Graff, resident, reiterated that water forms there no matter what kind of rain is received. V/M Massaro said she did not want a study done in the Boulevards because she wanted the records of studies that have been made examined to determine what kind of costs are involved. She MOVED that the City Engineer pull the old files, wherever they are, of the work that has been done and determine where they are from those records. V/M Massaro said after determination is made as to what has been done or was recommended to be done, then they can proceed from there. She said her MOTION was to TABLE the item. C/M Stein suggested that they determine the cost of the proposed study. He asked that Bill Greenwood supply them with the cost for James Montgomery to do the study. C/M Stein requested V/M Massaro AMEND the TABLING MOTION to direct Bill Greenwood to provide them with a cost for James M. Montgomery to do the study. Mr. Greenwood, City Engineer/Utilities Director, stated that the proposed cost submitted by James M. Montgomery is $6300 for the study which would cover only the Boulevards section. He explained the reason that area is very interesting from a flooding aspect is because the canal system goes through the two lakes that are over there and essentially deadends in that area. Mr. Greenwood said also of interest is the Fort Lauderdale wellfield has a drastic influence on those particular lakes as they are interconnected by a 42" pipe which flows in both directions depending on what happens with the Fort Lauderdale wellfield. He said there is a proposal by the County to put in a relief diversion around those two lakes and added that it is a very complex system because it involves not only the pipe size problem but also the deadheading of a canal system with a very small outlet. V/M Massaro reiterated the need to pull the files because there are a lot of problems there and those lakes are privately owned. She said they ran into money problems because they would not cooperate with the City. C/M Stein asked Mr. Greenwood for his recommendation. Mr. Greenwood answered that without a detailed study, whether it was performed in the past or in the future, they have tried to research the past and have not determined any real data on it, although they will be delving into it further as a result of Ms. Massaro's and Council's request. He added that the area is very complex and the improvements that have been made over there definitely have not eliminated the problem. C/M Stein asked if it was Mr. Greenwood's recommendation that they wait until the report is received. Mr. Greenwood stated he has no objection to researching the files further and going into more detail with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner to see if they can provide additional information from their archives. 18 9/26/85 /vdw C/M Stein SECONDED the TABLING with the understanding that the City Engineer will come back and give them a full report along with his recommendation. VOTE: ALL VOTED_ AYB TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST 17. Utilities West - Transmission acilitie - Northwest__ Force Main/Pump Station ,IProject 84-5) - Discussion and possible action to approve a contract with CH2M Hill to perform work on this project (tabled from 2/13/850 SYNOPSI OF ACTION: TABLED at the request of the City Engineer Mr. Bill Greenwood requested that this item be tabled until the next meeting to allow additional time to refine the contract. C/M Munitz so MOVED. SECONDED by V/M Massaro. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL 15. B_roward_League of Ci ies_BusipVsS - Discussion and possible action. SY,��QF_ACTION: Mayor Kravitz gave a report. Mayor Kravitz reported receipt of the Broward League of Cities bulletin which contained information on the upcoming election, municipal loans, Fair Labor Standard Act which will affect all the cities and notice of a legislative workshop on the Fair Labors Standards Act. He stated that the membership meeting was held last Thursday, September 19, 1985. He said the next meeting will be held on the third Thursday and the location will be announced. 16. Nortbwest_-Council of Mayors.Business - Discussion and possible action. ,EYNOP5IS OF ACTION: Mayor Kravitz gave a report. Mayor Kravitz reported that Parks and Recreation is in the pro- cess of mailing questionnaires inquiring what the other cities are doing. He said many cities are charging for certain activities and are also stating that when nonresidents use the facilities, the fees are different from those paid by the residents. Mayor Kravitz said they will submit completed questionnaires to the Parks and Recreation Committee for their recommendations which will eventually come before Council. He anticipated a report by the next Council meeting whereby Council can make a determination. Mayor Kravitz said his biggest concern is liability insurance as the carriers have cancelled certain insurance policies within the City. He said if the City is able to secure coverage, it may be three to four times the premium paid in the past and there is the question of whether or not Tamarac should go into self insurance. Mayor Kravitz said the Acting City Manager is checking into the insurance matter. 19 9/26/85 /vdw Tape Mayor Kravitz suggested that Mr. Perretti place the item on the 4 PreAgenda for discussion and possible action. C/M Stein suggested that some of the cities are working on the system of self insurance for the first $100#000 and have catastrophic added on by a surplus carrier. TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST 18. Utilities -West - Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project 84-4 Temp. Reso. #3776 - Discussion and possible action to approve Payment #4 to Interstate Pipe Maintenance, Inc., in the amount of $32,948.65. SYNOP51S OF ACTION: RESOLUTION NO. 85-289 PASSED APPROVED Payment #4 to Interstate Pipe Maintenance, Inc. for $32,948.65. Mr. Henning read Temp. _Reso._#3776 by title. V/M Massaro asked Bill Greenwood if this was the infiltration problem that is being corrected. Mr. Greenwood answered that it was. V/M Massaro asked if he was satisfied that they are curing the infiltration. The City Engineer agreed stating that the total project cost is over a half million dollars. He said the sewer system which is being rehabilitated now is in accord with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner's original study that the City paid for. He said major problems have been encountered: smashed pipes, open joints, complete root infestation and the amount of water that comes in from the particular leaks is very, very excessive. Mr. Greenwood said Williams, Hatfield & Stoner must, as part of their contract with the City, certify any actual reduction. He said their report indicated that their contract would eliminate 1.2 million gallons of excess flow and they must prove to the satisfaction of the State and Federal governments that they have achieved this goal. V/M Massaro asked if they do this with a final inspection or if the ongoing inspections will be put together to create their report. Mr. Greenwood replied at the end of the job, and after it has been completely finalized and inspected, Williams, Hatfield & Stoner will be required to go back into the same sewer system at the same points they made their original flow measurements and compare the existing flow with the past flow and certify to the reduction of 1.2 million gallons per day. V/M Massaro addressed the infestation of roots and asked if Council should be aware of certain trees suspectible to this and how they are planted, etc., to avoid this ongoing problem. Mr. Greenwood said the biggest problem is on private property but added that there are certain trees that have been outlawed in the City known to be major problems. He said the main thing the City can do to protect itself is by the proper installation of the sanitary sewers with the best materials available or pay for it later as the City is doing presently. V/M Massaro asked if the Beautification Committee should be requiring that for all new projects those trees be kept away from those lines. The City Engineer explained that his department has been attempt- ing with Richard Rubin in Site Plan Review and also with modifica- tions to the existing ordinances to implement that in sanitary 20 9/26/85 /vdw sewer easements, and rights -of -ways that shrubs, and low grass be allowed but trees and so forth be eliminated from these ease- ments. V/M Massaro said those easements should be on the Beautification Committee plans so they will be in a position to approve or dis- approve. Mr. Henning said, if Council directs, he can write the appropriate ordinance to have this included as part of the Beautification Committee's plans. He said there are two problems: 1. Trying to keep trees out of the utility easements, and they have been doing this on a case--by-case arrangement with the Beautification Plans which could be included in the Code. 2. The other problem is whether there is any change in the landscape plan requirements to include engineering. V/M Massaro said the sewer easement lines are needed. Florence Bochenek, Chairperson of the Beautification Committee, informed that on recent plans it has been indicated and where there is a problem, the trees are completely removed and only shrub and low -growing grass are allowed. She said the plans show where the sewer lines are and they have been advised not to allow any trees in that particular area. C/M Stein suggested that not only the easement but abutting the easement some of the trees have roots that go 20 to 30 feet and should be removed and replaced with another type of plant. V/M Massaro said trees could be planted because she did not want to get away from trees but the ones with the bad root system should be abolished. Florence Bochenek commented that there are certain trees that are not allowed in the City because of root problems. She said ficus and other trees of a like type are not allowed. V/M Massaro MOVED that Temp. Reso. 13776 be APPROVED which is the payment of $32,948.65. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 36. arac_Nur_s_ing_Center - Discussion and possible action on: a) Amendment to the Special Exception granted on 1/9/85 to permit construction of a 180-bed facility at the Tamarac Nursing Center on the west side of NW 79 Avenue, north of NW 57 Street - Temp.,es13172 b) Developers Agreement SYN9P.h9IE OF ACTION: TABLED to allow the City Attorney additional time for research. a) V/M Massaro said the project is not ready to move forward because she has not seen the resolution nor the covenant. She said this particular classification, ACLF, is inconsistent with the land use plan. Mr. Henning stated an agreement had been drafted and has been revised several times but both sides acknowledged that the ACLF beds are inconsistent with present land use plan allocations. He said that the agreement states that there will be a limitation on the ACLF beds until the land use plan changes were accomplished or somehow satisfied under the County and City land use plans. V/M Massaro disagreed because it would mean that they would be permitted to build and not use a certain number of units, and 21 J 9/26/85 /vdw asked what happens if the County does not a prove stated that they should have the amended landuse plan�hange. She The City Attorney said he was not advocating either way but stated he would bring them up to date as to what has happened on both sides. He said any changes in the land use plan will take a minimum of a year and there are a number of preparations that have to move forward if this plan is to be acceptable and the question is whether the work proceeds as the land use plan amendments are also proceeding. Mr. Henning said if it is not approved, upper floor would have to be vacant or used for an acceptable use. V/M Massaro said this project has been ongoing for a year and a half and but noted that it has never been before Council as that type of unit. V/M Massaro said they should be required to ga for the land use amendment and then come back for Council to determine whether ACLF units are wanted in the City. V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE to allow the City Attorney time for additional research. Jerry Schwarz, representative for HealthCare, stated that this problem developed through a very complicated set of circumstances and said he would accept the fault because he was not aware of some of the conditions in the land use plan and that the zoning code was inconsistent, in some cases, with the land use plan. He said when the problem was discovered at the County level in their review for platting purposes, they notated on their Certificate of Need there was mention of ACLF. Mr. Schwarz said the State's definition of ACLF is very vague, and since it was written several years ago, ACLF has changed dramatically as to the different types Of concepts and services offered. He said the plan, itself, from day one has never changed - the parking, the size of the building, the location of the building and even the services to be offered. He said the room sizes for the nursing home and for the assisted living are exactly the same. Mr. Schwarz stated that Mr. Henning and Mr. Rubin felt that although the change was very slight it would be best for all concerned that it be brought back to Council on an amendment basis for review. He said there are a couple of factors that weigh on this situation very heavily. They have written a developers' agreement which he felt would protect the City and also protects them. Mr. Henning said he himself wrote the developers' agreement to Protect the City because every time a developer comes in and writes an agreement, even though he approved it, the criticism and the problems have been tenfold. He said it was a relatively short agreement and felt it incumbent for him to write it. V/M Massaro said it was up to Mr. Schwarz to write his own agreement and if the City does not like it, Mr -Schwartz should amend it. She stated that neither Mr. Henning nor any of staff should be doing the work of the developer. Mr. Schwarz continued that prior to the issuance of a Certificate Of Occupancy, they must either conform with the County and City Land Use Plans or they must declare that portion of the building, which is classified as ACLF, as being nonprofit. He said either one of those conditions would satisfy the Code and they are very confident that they can meet either one, if not both of those conditions, within the one-year period it will take to build. Mr. Schwarz said this project has been before Council and staff for over a year and has been reviewed exhaustively and felt that staff liked the plan and concept. He said delaying the project for a year, which is what they would be doing by going to the land use change plan first, could cause them to lose the Certificate of Need. Mr. Schwarz stated that if it is Mr. Henning'8 opinion that the City will be protected under this agreement, and it is his opinion that his company will be protected under this agreement, he would like to see the project go forward. Mayor Kravitz advised him that Council has to be satisfied, too. V/M Massaro said she was not sure that they wanted an ACLF in the 22 9/26/85 /vdw �. City and asked that they not make any decision today. V/M Massaro requested an OPEN TABLING. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. YM: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye LEGAL AFFAIRS 26. Albert Miller vs. C H a ac - Discussion and possible action on payment of the City's insurance attorneys (tabled from 9/11/85) �SYNO,$IE OF ACTION: Held for afternoon session (See Page 39) Mr. Henning clarified that in the Albert Miller lawsuit the City won; therefore, there were no damages, except all the professional fees that were involved in defending and vindicating the City. He said the attorneys for the insurance company defended the City as well as the company and the question was since the City won why do they have to pay the $2500 deductible. Mr. Henning said the bottom line is the terms of their insurance policy provided that Professional services are the first $2500 under their insurance coverage. He said this is an area they might want to change and does get involved in the rates. V/M Massaro requested a copy of the portion of the City's policy which states that. Mayor Kravitz suggested that this be discussed in the afternoon portion for receipt of the memo. 27. 't A to a Prof ssi nal a vices - Discussion and possible action on payment to the law offices of Alan F. Ruf for consulting attorney and City prosecution services and transfer of funds from Contingency to fund these in- voices (tabled from 9/11/85) .r�YNOP,�IS OF ACTION: APPROVED under Check Request #08297 payment to Alan F. Ruf for $1,796.70 C/M Munitz asked if there were monies available in the Con- tingency Fund to pay the invoice should Council approve it. Acting City Manager Perretti said there were funds available for Payment. Mr. Henning asked for Council's assistance in funding the Consulting Services Account because the funds are nearly depleted. He recommended that Mr. Ruf be paid. V/M Massaro MOVED the APPROVAL of the invoices for Attorney Alan Ruf. Mr. Henning said it was Check Request #08297. Vickie Beech, resident, questioned when there is a violation under the Code of the City and Mr. Ruf has been engaged to represent the City against the violator why the onus is put on the residents that they should pursue it further even though it is a violation of the law. She explained that a memo was sent to her, pursuant to a complaint she filed, stating that the matter should be pursued in a private avenue. Ms. Beech said the topic of the complaint was specifically in the area for which Mr. Ruf was engaged to enforce these particular laws and wanted to clarify what his position is and where his duties begin and end and how it affects them as taxpayers. 23 9/26/85 j /vdw �` ` SECONDED by C/M Munitz. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye - - - - - Mayor Kravitz recessed the meeting until1`30 P.M. - - - - - - Tape Mayor Kravitz reconvened the meeting at 1:30 P.M. 5 ROLL CALL: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Present C/M Gottesman Present V/M Massaro Present Mayor Kravitz Present LEGAL AFFAIRS. 31. DIP-w-01d__County Annexation_pL Qkopal - Tem eso. 3783 - Annexation Report by the City Planner concerning land east and west of Shaker Village. Discussion and possible action. YN0--W-$_ OF_, ACTION: APPROVED as amended. RESOLUTION NO. 85-292 PASSED Williams, Hatfield & Stoner authorized to prepare sketches at a cost not to exceed $500.00 C/M Gottesman read Tem . eso. 3783 by title. Mr. Henning reported that in recent months Broward County has been working on what they hope to be noncontroversial pockets of unincorporated areas in the County by putting together a Master Plan of annexation in order to get out of some of the business of municipal services such as police protection, fire protection, etc. He said some of the areas are contested. The City Attorney stated there is a proposed agreement or resolution, where sometime in the next two or three years at the latest, all of the various groups or enclaves will be annexed into the adjacent cities by a special act of the Legislature which is one form of annexation. He said there are three locations which have been indicated as Possible land to come into the City of Tamarac by this general annexation program: area just south of Bailey Road, near 64th which contains two pieces of property, and a commercial piece of property on the south side of Commercial Boulevard. The City Attorney said the County is asking for two things; (1) They want the City to provide them with sketch surveys for the three parcels involved with each City required to present their own drawings so that the County does not have to incur that cost. Mr. Henning said this could be done by Williams, Hatfield & Stoner or Montgomery Engineering. (2) The County requests the City's assistance in preparing an economic impact study which would require the submission of sketches by October 1, if possible. V/M Massaro said Dick Rubin had received an offer from Williams, Hatfield & Stoner to prepare the legals at a cost of $500 and so MOVED. C/M Gottesman asked Mr. Rubin what kind of survey would be received for the $500. Mr. Rubin said it would be a sketch of survey of the two parcels of land on both sides of Shaker Village which would show main streets. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. Mr. Rubin clarified that the MOTION was to AUTHORIZE the Consultant City Engineers to prepare a survey up to $500. 24 9/26/85 i /vdw J V/M Massaro specified that they were hiring Williams, Hatfield & Stoner. C/M Munitz inquired if passing this resolution meant Council is agreeing to annex these lands. Mr. Rubin answered that it is a two-step process and the first step is the County wants to know if the City is agreeable to the two parcels which previous Councils have indicated they would like. The City Planner clarified there are only two parcels that are being uncontested and those are the ones for which Mr. Nolan will prepare the surveys. He said the parcel on Commercial Boulevard is being contested by Fort Lauderdale and Oakland Park. Mr. Henning said if the resolution is passed, Council would be endorsing it. Mr. Rubin said this is a countywide annexation proposal and the County Commission has elected to push forward the first phase of annexation for those parcels that are uncontested and are not controversial for submission to the State Legislature for approval Mr. Rubin said the County is not doing anything about the con- tested parcel this year but felt that discussions should be continued on it. Mr. Henning suggested an amendment on page 2, line 11, to read, "...Submit said legal description to Broward County Commissioners by October 1, 1985 or as soon thereafter as possible." V/M Massaro said the MOTION can be AS AMENDED. Mr. Rubin clarified for the record that he has spoken with the County and they are willing to extend the deadline. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 34. Amoco Oil Company(nv (Bouthepst pgrner of Commercial Boul rd gnd _e_l Q d_7 - tevised .Sjte Pion - Temp. Reso. #377.5 Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan re- flecting two new pump islands and four dispenser units. SYNOPSIS 2F—ACTION: APPROVED Temp. eso _43775 RESOLUTION NO. 3775 PASSED with conditions Mr. Henning read Temla. Reso-__#3775 by title. Mr. Rubin said this site is the southeast corner of Commercial and 441 and that Council is aware that staff has been working with the owners of the three remaining corners to upgrade their landscaping He said Amoco requested that underground storage tanks be in con- formance with Federal mandate and they have permits and are under construction. The City Planner said Amoco has also requested to replace the pump islands with modern, electronic dispensing units which required a revised site plan. Mr. Rubin said it was placed on the agenda for discussion to determine if the City would like to see the landscaping of that center upgraded as Amoco contends that every foot of landscaped area is already developed with landscaping. Mr. Rubin said his recommendation is to add wherever beautification can be done. V/M Massaro recommended two planters, one between the two driveways on the Commercial Boulevard side and one between the two driveways on the State Road 7 side of the property; each will have a continous low hedge and not less than four (4) flowering hibis- cus in accordance with revised plan. 25 9/26/85 /vdw v Mr. Ed Sihawki, local representative for Amoco, agreed to implement the requested changes. V/M Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of Temp eso. #3775 AS AMENDED to include installation of two planters, one between the two drive- ways on the Commercial Boulevard side and one between the two driveways on the State Road 7 side of the property; each will have a continuous low hedge and not less than four (4) flowering hibiscus in accordance with revised plan. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye 37. Woodmont Tract 50 - Discussion and possible action on: a) Easement and Option Agreement - Temp._Reso. 3780 b) Model Sales Facility S_YNOPSIS_OF_ACTIgL a) APPROVED Temp. Reso. #3180 RESOLUTION NO. 85-294 PASSED b) APPROVED a) Mr. Henning read Temp. Rgso. #3780 by title. V/M Massaro MOVED the ADOPTION of Tie p_Rgso. 3780. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye b) V/M Massaro MOVED to APPROVE the extension of the permit for the model sales. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye - - PUBLIC HEARINGS - 2:00 P.M. - - - - - - - - - - - 23. nzi __end Maria Qsso - Specia Exc tion etition -- 120-Z-85 -- TemP_._Reso. #3767 - Discussion and possible action to grant a special exception to permit on premises consumption of beer and wine at Nunzio's Italian Restaurant proposed for Bay 44 of Tamarac Market Place, 10012 West McNab Road, which is zoned B 3 (General Business) SYNOPS I S_.OF „_ACTION APPROVED with conditions RESOLUTION NO. 85-290 PASSED Mr. Henning read Tem eso. 13767 The City Attorney informed that this restaurant is located in Tamarac Market Place on McNab Road and Nob Hill. He said their request is for special exception, as provided for in the Code, for on -premises consumption of beer and wine. V/M Massaro asked the petitioner when they planned to open for business. Maria Osso, co-owner of Nunzio's Italian Restaurant, said they plan to open as soon as they get the. CO. Mrs. Osso said she could not provide a date but that she had been making a lot of phone 1 1 26 9/26/85 /vdw calls to the owner of the shopping area and he has not contacted her. She stated that construction has been slow. V/M Massaro asked Mr. Henning, because construction has been so slow, what happens if anything fails between this applicant and the owner if the City has issued a license. She said that the license could be non -transferable. Mayor Kravitz opened the the public hearing. Hearing no response, Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing. V/M Massaro MOVED the APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #3767 with the stipulation that it is non -transferable and is to be issued to Mr. and Mrs Osso, known as Nunzio's Italian Restaurant, Bay 44 and the hours are from 8:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. Mr. Henning asked if the business was a corporation. Mrs. Osso said it was not. Mr. Henning suggested that the special exception be issued to Mr. & Mrs. Osso doing business as Nunzio's Italian Restaurant. V/M Massaro ACCEPTED this suggestion as part of her MOTION. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye Mr. Henning stated for the record that it does not mean that it can not be transferred but it does mean if the wish to transfer it, they would have to come back to address Council. 19. Mobil Oil Corporation - Rezoning Petition #12-Z-85_ - Temp. Ord. #1219 - Discussion and possible action to rezone the lands at the southwest corner of Commercial Boulevard and State Road 7 from B-1 (Neighborhood Business) to B-3 (General Business). Second Reading. a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Posting. b) Consideration of application. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Public hearing held. Second Reading TABLED to 10/23/85 meeting. Mr. Henning read Temp. Ord. #1219 by title. Mr. Rubin said the stipulation was not signed as requested by Council at a previous meeting. He recapped that this was a request by Mobil Oil to rezone their land and augment the filling station and car wash which Council indicated they would accept on First Reading. Mr. Rubin said Council also required a covenant limiting it to those uses and does not know if Council has accepted the wording of the covenant. Mayor Kravitz opened the hearing to the public. Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing upon hearing no response. V/M Massaro said she does not know if Mobil Oil has accepted the amendment on page 2 and stated that it calls for an exhibit which is not attached. She said she would like to have a signed copy, in its final form and the exhibit attached to it with a sketch. Upon a question by Mayor Kravitz, Assistant City Clerk Carol Barbuto acknowledged receipt of the Affidavit of Publication but stated that the applicant is not here to sign the Affidavit of Posting. 27 9/26/85 /vdw Mr. Henning reviewed the deed restriction which stated that the property is now B-1 and the Board of Adjustment granted a variance for the undersized lot because there was a minimum lot requirement of one acre for the B-3 zoning. He said this variance, in essence, gave them B-1 and B-2 and B-3 only for the limited purposes of the car wash, the service station and the convenience store. Mr. Henning said the question that arose when they were informed that they could have B-1 and B-2 was under what Code. He said there were two alternatives One would be the Tamarac City Code as it exists today, B-1 and B-2 and the other alternative would be B-1 and B-2 as they have had some problems in the past restricting themselves to old codes such as the County Code of 1972, and his suggestion was, for workability for the staff and to keep it consistent with the rest of the City, that it should be B 1 and B-2 as may be amended from time to time. V/M Massaro concurred. Mr. Emerson Allsworth, attorney for Mobil Oil, said he was aware of the proposed change in the deed restriction and they are agreeable to it. He asked, since they are agreeable and it would have to be sent to Virginia where the Mobil Corporate Offices are, would Council pass the ordinance subject to the City receiving the executed agreement. Mayor Kravitz said after it is approved he would like to see it come back to Council. Mr. Henning asked if Council would consider approving the declaration by motion indicating approval of the text so Mobil can get it signed and bring it back and the item can be tabled until it is received which would eliminate the need for another public hearing. Mr. Allsworth commented that he could not get it signed and returned in two weeks and asked Council to table it thirty (30) days. Mayor Kravitz suggested that it be tabled subject to Mr. Allsworth having submitted it to the City Clerk or City Attorney. Mr. Allsworth stated that it was an advertised meeting and felt the date needed to be certain. Mr. Henning said October 23 is the date of the second meeting of the month. Mr. Allsworth said the change was only made within a couple of days and could not understand why Council could not approve the zoning subject to having it executed because then another meeting will not be needed. V/M Massaro said the problem was no exhibit was attached, and they would like to see the signed copy in its final form and all complete. She said other than that there was no problem. V/M Massaro MOVED that Temp. Ord. #1219 be TABLED until the meeting of October 23, 1985. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye 20. Univgrsit Com unit Hospital - ezoning_.Petiti n 17-Z-85 Tepp_. Ord. #1220 - Discussion and possible action to rezone lands at the rear of the Hospital pro- perty, extending approximately 336.7-feet west of the west property line of the Hospital, from R-4A (Planned Apartments) to B-6 (Business District), utilizing the 5% 28 9/26/85 /vdw flexibility rule for commercial development in resi- dential land use area not to exceed 10 acres. Second Reading. a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of Posting b) Consideration of application YN P�_QF_ACTION: TABLED, on Second Reading, to reconvened meeting on Monday, 9/30/85, for submission of stipulation in final form that this land will be used for parking only. Public Hearing held. Tape Michael Shiff, representative of University Community Hospital, 6 believed the hospital has no problem in putting the document in whatever form the City Attorney wishes. He said the addition of the legal description would probably define it better. Mr. Shiff asked that Council approve and pass the ordinance on final reading subject to Mr. Henning's approval of the document and it being recorded. Mayor Kravitz opened the hearing to the public. Hearing no response from the public, Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing. V/M Massaro said they would also need a graphic sketch with the legal description, a graphic sketch on the Unity of Title and she did not feel the form was proper on the Unity of Title and suggested that Mr. Henning and Mr. Rubin could tell him what he needs to do and bring it back at the next regular meeting. V/M Massaro added that what they are asking for does have to be in correct legal form in accordance with the City Code. Mr. Shiff said the Unity of Title does have an attached legal sketch and the form of the Unity of Title is the exact form of Unity of Title that was approved on the Vintage Center. He asked Mr. Henning what form he would like the stipulation regarding parking, and reiterated that if Council felt the contents of the text is acceptable, he would like their approval contingent upon Mr. Henning approving the final draft of the stipulation. V/M Massaro said she wanted it to come back before Council in final form. Mr. Henning said he had no problem with the Unity of Title but did not think that the parking subject belonged in the Unity of Title. Mayor Kravitz suggested that Mr. Schiff get together with Mr. Henning and draw up the final papers and whenever it is ready, he can present it to Council at a future meeting. qt Mr. Shiff said his problem is that they have a corporation that owns the hospital and they are based in Nashville and the owners can not understand why they are encountering all these problems. He said he did not want them to get nervous and withdraw plans for expansion. Mayor Kravitz asked him if he could have everything ready for the reconvened meeting on Monday, September 30, 1985. 29 9/26/85 /vdw Mr. Schiff said if they could get together with Mr. Henning they would be able to bring it back for Monday's meeting. V/M Massaro MOVED that this item be HELD until Monday's meeting whereby it can be submitted in final form. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. VOTE• ALL VOTED AYE 21. Dinerskgldn Builders - Re zo in Petit'on _#15 - Tem_ Discussion and possible action to rezone the proposed site for the cabana and pool area for Boardwalk Apartments on the north side of NW 61 Street between NW 84 Terrace and NW 88 Avenue from R-4A (Planned Apartments) to S-1 (Open Space/Recreation). First Reading. a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of Mailing and Affidavit of Posting b) Consideration of application BYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) ACCEPTED b) APPROVED Tem�..__Qjm d. #1212 on First Reading Public Hearing held b) a) b) Mr. Henning read Tem d. 1212 by title. Richard Rubin, Consultant Planner, said the applicant has submitted the request for rezoning in order to place the cabana and pool area and clubhouse into the S-1 zoning district and the City will have the assurance that the area will be maintained for open space/recreation purposes and he recommended approval of the rezoning. Mayor Kravitz opened the public hearing. Harold H. Newman, resident, inquired as to the development because he had no objection to the rezoning. He said when the Dinersteins were here and received their approval it was understood that it was to be an adult community. Mayor Kravitz concurred stating that he has researched it himself; however, since it is not on the public hearing, he asked the City Attorney to speak with Mr. Newman after the meeting and provide him with all the background. Mayor Kravitz closed the hearing to the public. C/M Munitz MOVED the adoption of Temp. 0rd#1212 on First Reading. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. Assistant City Clerk Barbuto acknowledged receipt of the Affidavits of Publication, Mailing and Posting. C/M Munitz MOVED the ADOPTION and ACCEPTANCE of the Affidavits as listed. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye 30 9/26/85 /vdw 1 22. Dinerstein Bpil gar - RezgpingPetition #19-Z-85 - e . #1213 - Discussion and possible action to rezone the proposed site for the clubhouse for Boardwalk Apartments on the south side of NW 61 Street between NW 84 Terrace and NW 88 Avenue from R-4A (Planned Apartments) to S-1 (Open Space/Recreational). First Reading. a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of Mailing and Affidavit of Posting b) Consideration of application 5Y-NOP5.E_ OF ACTION: a) ACCEPTED b) APPROVED Temp. Ord. #1213 on First Reading Public Hearing held Mr. Henning read Temp. Orel. #1213 by title. Mayor Kravitz opened the public hearing. Mayor Kravitz, hearing no response from the public, closed the public hearing. a) Assistant City Clerk Carol Barbuto acknowledged receipt of the Affidavits of Publication, Mailing and Posting. C/M Gottesman MOVED the ACCEPTANCE of the Affidavits of Publication, Mailing and Posting. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. TE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye b) C/M Gottesman MOVED the ADOPTION of Temp. Ord. #1213 on First Reading. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye 24. Tamarac Ut_iliti-ep West - Temp. Reso. #3765 - Discussion and possible action to establish and modify certain water and sewer service rates and charges applicable to customers west of State Road 7. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED to 9/30/85 reconvened meeting. Public Hearing held. Mr. Henning read Temp_,-Bpgg.-13165by title. The City Attorney explained that this is a rate resolution which, by City Code, requires advertisement three days prior to the public hearing, and advised if Council wishes to conduct the public hearing and close it and table the vote for another day, they can do so. He also informed that if they wish to continue the public hearing to a date certain in the near future they could do that if they announce a specific time at today's hearing. Bill Greenwood, City Engineer/Utilities Director, introduced 31 9/26/85 /vdw Mr. Glenn Humphrey and Mr. David who performed the rate study for prepared to give a presentation. Smith from Montgomery Engineers the city and stated they are Mr. Glenn Humphrey displayed a slide presentation which covered the existing rates and the proposed rates the primary reason for which is the increased debt service that will be incurred for the improvements that are necessary to the utility system. (See attachments) Mr. Humphrey explained that the existing rate schedule was analyzed in terms of future revenue needed to cover the increased debt service which came to approximately 20% to 21% increase. He said the debt service came close to doubling in order to implement the new programs. Hr. Humphrey said under the proposed rate schedule the multi- family units would be at the 65% level on the base facility charge but the water and sewer rates per thousand gallons of usage are identical regardless of whether it is commercial or resi- dential, multifamily or single family. Mr. Humphrey said the same thing is true of sewerage, however, there is a difference between multifamily and single family in the usage resulting in the base facility charges being somewhat different. He said the actual commodity charge, based on the amount used, is $1.50 for 1000 gallons. Glenn Humphrey displayed a table with the existing rates and the proposed rates. He said the total bill for average customers who use between 0 and 15,000 gallons monthly under the present rate is $16.70 and will increase to $19.61 under the proposed rates. Mr. Humphrey said the larger users who use over 15,000 gallons monthly would increase their costs under the proposed rates to approxi- mately $54 from $37 to $38 under present rates. Multi-family's average usage is about 3,800 gallons with the total present average bill of $12.54 and will increase to just under $14.94 on the average. Mr. Humphrey said this was about, on the average, a 17% increase for the average single-family customer and approximately 19% for the average multi -family customer. Mr. Humphrey presented a slide which addressed irrigation issues. He explained that there are people who utilize irrigation meters 1" in size and their total bill at present is approximately $13.00 but will increase considerably higher to $21.58 on the average for single-family. He said homeowner associations' average, at present, is $24.53 and would rise to $52.00 under the proposed schedule. Mr. Humphrey explained for commercial irrigation where they have small, medium and large meters the increase will be from $21 to $36; $57 to $103 and $116 to $182 and all computations are based on the historical usage data which has been accumulated over the past few years, and it places the debt service burden into the service availability charge. V/M Massaro asked if the total amount for the debt service for the new bond that is going to be issued is included in those figures. Mr. Humphrey said they were included based on an assumption even though the final numbers are not available. He said it was done to insure there was had sufficient debt service coverage and also met the requirements of the funding agencies for grants. V/M Massaro asked if the debt service was planned on 110%. Glenn Humphrey said they did over a three-year period. He said the smaller commercial user has a major increase because of the service availability charge jumping significantly from $15 to $25 in the medium range. Glenn Humphrey clarified that what they did was look at a three-year projection of revenues trying to maintain rates so they will not have to be changed every year. V/M Massaro asked if the percentage was greater before the three year period. Mr. David Smith answered, on the assumption that this was effective last October, it would be 112% the first and second years and 110% the third because the expenses are going up. 32 9/26/85 J /vdw Mayor Kravitz opened the meeting to the public. Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing upon hearing no response from the public. V/M Massaro said she would like to see this item TABLED to Monday's reconvened meeting to allow the City Engineer time to speak to the Consulting Engineer, Williams, Hatfield & Stoner's Tony Nolan, to determine that he is satisfied with the debt service inasmuch as he is responsible for the bond issue and she SO MOVED. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye 25. Tamarac Utilities East - TeMp. Repg�. #3766 - Discussion and possible action to clarify categories of water and sewer service rates and charges applicable to customers east of State Road 7. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION APPROVED Temp. Resp. #3766 RESOLUTION NO. 85-291 PASSED Public Hearing held Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso_.13766 by title. Mr. Tom Force, City Grant Administrator, explained that they wanted clarification on the east side sewer usage charge because the old resolution did not breakout the multi- family, did not address the homeowners' associations and did not cover the question of irrigation water along with several other items that were not addressed. He said it needed to be brought up to date and stipulated that there are no new rates involved as the rates are the same but needed the language clarified for the State requirements so the City can be reimbursed for the anticipated grants for the east side. Mr. Force informed that they have accepted the grant and they will be going out to bid, shortly but the new resolution needs to be in effect and adopted. The Grant Administrator acknowledged that two additional items have changed: one is Item J on page 2, "Reimbursement for extra expenses during and after working hours" whereby the fees stated are incorrect. He said Resolution R-85-72 is in effect which specifies the hourly charge for regular and overtime per job requirement and requested that it be adopted into Item J. Mr. Force said Item D in Section II has been changed, "Dual Check Valve Installation" which is at cost plus 10% when it is installed in a residence in the future. Mayor Kravitz opened the meeting to the public. Bernard Campbell, resident of Tamarac Lakes North Section, stated, relative to the increases in the rates back in April, that have increased from the regular budget set up last September. He asked if the increases were based upon the fact that the City was installing the sewer line in I and II and paying off the loan of $147,000 for the work. Mayor Kravitz answered there was no rate increase. Mr. Campbell asked if the City did not enter into an agreement when the grant was received from the State to borrow $147,000 to be paid off at $8,675.09 a year until it is paid in full. Mr. Greenwood, City Engineer/Utilities Director, said Mr. Campbell was referring to the Capital Improvements Account and those monies are not due in the account until next fiscal year; therefore, there is absolutely no increase in the existing rates in Tamarac Utilities East. 33 9/26/85 /vdw Mr. Campbell said he was right, and asked if this was going into this fiscal year as of October 1 which is within about 10 days so these rates will take effect within ten days. Mr. Perretti answered that it will be the following fiscal year. Mr. Campbell said if it was 1986 and 1987 that would be different. He said, however, what confuses him is that in the budget there is a request for $147,000 and asked if it was for this particular fund. Bill Greenwood answered that the $147,000 is the City's share of the grant and the money will come from the reserve accounts which presently exist and has absolutely nothing again to do with the existing rate structure. Mr. Campbell said that meant he was blocked off from talking about the $147,000 because after all is said and done the $147,000 will be paid off at approximately $.72 monthly and that was the reason he thought the sewer was increased to $3.20. V/M Massaro said the questions Mr. Campbell might be raising, as they relate to the monies that were on hand, have been researched by Alan Ruf so that they will have a clear picture of every single step. She requested the minutes and verbatim statements copied and all figures, in black and white, so there will be absolutely no question as far as he is concerned or any resident. V/M Massaro said she wanted to insure that the residents will be given proper credit but continued that she could not respond in detail because Mr. Ruf has not completed his research and was not sure he would have it ready by Monday. V/M Massaro asked Mr. Henning, inasmuch as that information may not be available for Monday, how would it affect the public hearing and what can be done so as not to have wasted the money that was spent for advertising the public hearing. Tape Mr. Henning said he understood, from the original presentation, 7 that the rates are not changing by this TUE Rate Resolution, but the purpose of this resolution is to add additional provisions that are required by the State agencies who control the grant money. He said, in that sense, Council could move forward with the resolution because it needed to be adopted by Monday, if possible, to move forward with the budget and the grants. The City Attorney addressed the question concerning a refunding of any surplus stating if it does not impact on the rates, there is no need to have a hearing on it and Council can take whatever action it deems appropriate. V/M Massaro explained that, to a certain extent, it did impact on the rates because if part of that money is not used for the improvements that have to be made this next year, then the rates will increase. Mr. Henning said before the City receives the grant money there has to be matching funds for the project. He said the grant does not cover the project so if the funding is not available, the City does not receive the grant money. Mr. Campbell said, in other words, the $147,000 has been allocated the State could give the matching funds. The City Attorney explained there were three alternatives: (1) not do the sewer hookup at all and deal with the ground water problems and the individual septic tanks that may need repair, (2) do it the way the City is doing it which is part from the funds of the City and part from the grant or (3) turn down the grant and do it all with City money. He said at some point during the last year it was determined that the best alternative was to do it with a portion of the grant money and a portion of the city money. Mr. Henning said they have made a commitment to have some of the "surplus" committed to the program. He said the Vice Mayor 34 9/26/85 /vdw stated that if the residents do not want the money to come out of "surplus" it can come from increased rates. Mayor Kravitz suggested that Alan Ruf, Consulting City Attorney, give his input on the subject. Mr. Campbell gave his blessings to continuing the present because he is satisfied with them but he hated the little "extras" on there. Mr. Ruf said he has recently read through the minutes of the various budget hearings on the East Utility since 1980 and has also looked at the income and expenditures of the East Utility starting in the budget year 1978/79. He reported consistently during that period of time, which is a 7 to 8 year period, the City has been a good manager and has been able to create a surplus with enough monies to make sure that the system is able to be maintained and improved without a significant rate increase. Mr. Ruf said, in his opinion, the use of this fund for the proposed City's share of the Sanitary Sewer System in the east of the city to benefit the residents is an appropriate use of that fund. $e said he was reminded of how they would be if the hurricane that is going to hit the Carolina coast were to hit their coast and they did not have sufficient reserves in the utility accounts and general operating account to do whatever is necessary to put essential services back in place. He added that it was good management to have those surpluses in place and available in times such as this when a significant portion of the Sanitary Sewer System needs upgrading. Mr. Campbell disagreed with Mr. Ruf as to his support for reserve buildup. He said he has a ten-year background on all the budgets Presented by the Council. Mr. Campbell referenced that in 1979/80 the budget at that time was $173,000, and in 1981 when the 201 system was started, the budget jumped to $292,000. He said in 1982 it increased to $336,000 and in 1983 to $356,000 and last year Council reduced the rates and were able to get by on a budget of $215,000 and have a "surplus". Mr. Campbell said Steve Wood, former Finance Director, gave them a list of the reserves: 1977 - $ 53,000 1978 - $ 70,000 1979 - $ 95,000 1980 - $115,000 1981 - $141,000 1982 - $206,000 1983 - $300,000 1984 - $440,000 Mr. Campbell said these reserves were built up when the residents were overcharged. He said that is why he objected when it is handed to him this way. He reit erated satisfaction with the present rates as long as the budget does not jump from $215,000 to $422,000. Mr. Campbell said when Council increases the funds for $147,000 for the sewer line down in I and II, $150,000 for replacement of ten lift stations and then $50,000 for engineering survey he objected because once that is placed in the budget, it gives the City the option to come back and hit the residents with it by taking it from the "surplus" fund. Mayor Kravitz answered that what he was discussing was another topic of which Council was aware. He said it was discussed at the last meeting that if there was anything left after expenses, the residents should be given a refund and will be taken up at another time. Mr. Campbell said his objection is replacement of the ten lift stations next year at a cost of $150,000. He questioned whether all ten lift stations could go back at once and recommended that the replacements be spread out over a period of time. 35 9/26/85 /vdw Mr. Greenwood answered there are six pump stations that were in deplorable condition and definitely need to be replaced. Mr. Campbell said it was reduced from ten to six at a savings of approximately $90,000. Jack Castaldi, resident of the Boulevards, stated that he is originally from Connecticut and when they decided to replace the septic tanks with sewers, they did not take the money from the people who lived on that street to construct them but assessed each resident giving them the option to pay it immediately or have ten years in which to pay with interest. Mr. Ruf stated the option, when public improvements are being done to a particular area of the City, is to set up a special assessment district and assess each house in that particular area for the improvement; however, historically, Tamarac has rejected that option. He said the oldest sections of the City are in the east and when a road is repaved in the east, it comes from the general taxes even though the taxpayers in the west may not need their streets repaved for years and years. Mr. Ruf evidenced that other problems have been resolved and paid for through the General Obligation Fund and Council has not approached a particular group of people and asked them to pay but instead spread the cost out to all the taxpayers of the City. Mr. Ruf said it has been an appro- priate approach and an appropriate way to expend the "surplus fund. He said the surplus has been accumulated because nothing has been done in the way of improvements for eight years, it comes down to the point, somewhere or another, it has to be done. Mr. Castaldi commented that the money was raised for a specific reason: to join the 201 system with Fort Lauderdale. He said that did not materialize so the money accrued interest and felt that if it were to be spent, the people should determine how and where. Mr. Ruf referenced minutes whereby former City Manager Laura Sturrmans said that the reason these funds accumulated was that the City did not hook in to the Fort Lauderdale 201 system as quickly as had been anticipated. He felt it was a novel proposal that if there is good manage ment or if anticipated capital improvements are not done, and there are surplus monies, that a refund check be given to the users but added that he did not know of any situations where that has been done by any city. Walter Blocher, Tamarac Lakes North, asked if he had the correct understanding that Mr. Ruf is doing the work on the excess fund and he is the deciding factor as to whether there is or is not a surplus. Mayor Kravitz said he was not correct. Ralph Stoltz, resident of the Boulevards, concurred with Mr. Castaldi's statement that the money was collected to join the 201 system. He asked if the City was making a profit on the water and sewer and, if so, how much. Mr. Henning answered there is no profit in the sense that it is a profit organization but there may be some retained earnings that are surplus at the end of the year but added that he did not know what they were. Mr. Etheredge answered that the utility operation has to be designed around the people it is serving and the rates need to be structured to provide all the current operations of the utility plus any capital that needs to be done or plans developed and the rates set upon that. He said there has been some confusion as to the surplus claimed to have been built and needed to be given back. Mr. Etheredge said the money can be given back but the residents will be faced with a 66% increase in their rates. Walter Blocher, resident, asked if he stated that they had $140,000 that they are already giving into that fund and they are 1-1 36 9/26/85 /vdw in good shape with a $400,000 budget which does not need an increase and that there are still more monies in excess of that which should be returned. Mr. Etheredge said most of the money they are calling "surplus" will be used to fund the projects mentioned. Mr. Stoltz asked if the money the residents are paying the City for water and sewer is over and above what the City is paying Fort Lauderdale for the water and sewer. V/M Massaro rephrased Mr. Stoltz's question and asked, when all expenses are deducted, including the amount paid to Fort Lauderdale for water and sewer, are there any monies left over from the present rate. The Finance Director said there may be some minor surplus but when the books are closed out at the end of the year, he expected fund balance to be less this year than last year. He stated that some of the surplus money had to be used just to keep operations going this year because there were no capital projects which meant the City is not collecting quite enough on the system to pay for all the expenses of the fund. Mr. Etheredge explained the budget has increased because of the projects such as the gravity collections system, the six pumps and the $50,000 engineering study. Mr. Stoltz asked Mr. Greenwood to explain to him exactly what has to be done on the lift stations for it to cost so much. Mr. Greenwood said sewerage is a very disagreeable material to have in a residence. He said sewerage contains all the grit that comes off the dishes and explained that it is a very aggresive, corrosive, nasty, and malodorous material. Mr. Greenwood said that it completely corrodes pump stations' pipings and the last time the pump stations were overhauled was approximately eight years ago. The City Engineer said it was his and staff's opinion that the operation and maintenance costs of the pump stations will definitely be lowered by their complete replacements as they have used up their useful life. Mr. Greenwood said all the rotating assemblies that are involved with the pumps are cor- roded. Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing. C/M Stein MOVED the adoption of Temp. Reso. #3766. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. VQTE C/M Stein Aye C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Absent V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 32. Moil 0j1Cgrporatign (Southwest Corner of Commercial Boulevard and State Road 7) - Temp._ eso. #3768 - Discussion and possible action on a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants. SYNOPSI,SOF ACTION: TABLED to 10/23/85 for an executed document Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3768. by title. V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE Temp. Reso. #3768 for the 10/23/85 meeting for receipt of an executed document. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 37 9/26/85 /vdw 33. Univers tY��ommu�itY_flospital - �e p. Reso.�I3762. - Discussion and possible action on a Declaration of Unity Title. ayNOPPSI,S OF ACTION: TABLED to 9/30/85 reconvened meeting. Mr. Henning read Temp. eso. 137—U by title. V/M Massaro MOVED that the item be TABLED and brought back when Ord. #1220 is acted upon on 9/30/85. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE FIE&NCIAL 11. waste na em nt nc. - Temp. Reso�781 - Discussion and possible action to approve the Second Addendum to the contract for residential and condominium garbage collection. UY.NQPSIS OF_ ACTION: TABLED to a future meeting Mr. Henning read TPMP-,-, s,Q,,. #3781 by title. Mr. Henning said there is an increase of the tipping charge at the County rate. He explained that originally when the City contracted with Waste Management, a little over a year ago, the tipping charge was $16 per ton and a few weeks after the contract was concluded, the rate increased to $22 per ton and it is now $25. Mr. Henning said the contract is subject to the County rate and the rate change is effective October 1, 1985 by the County which brings the curbside, single family home to $6.01 monthly and the cost for a condominium unit dumpster to $3.02 monthly. V/M Massaro stated she had been informed that the tipping increases do not correspond with what other cities had been announcing as increases and felt before this resolution was approved, the City should investigate it further and discuss it at the next regular meeting. The City Attorney said the rates were based on a fixed rate per unit calculated by the County and asked Mr. Allsworth if the number was $.57. Emerson Allsworth informed that the $3 per ton increase is the same at both landfills in the County whether a City's garbage is taken to the landfill in Davie or whether it goes to the landfill off Sample Road as happens with the refuse from the City of Tamarac. He explained that the County rate at the landfill in Davie goes up at the same time whereby they arrived at the calculated increase and the North Broward landfill has always accepted the County's figures which are based on the census computation of population versus tonnage. Mr. Allsworth said the increase was $.57 per dwelling unit and said, in answer to V/M Massaro's question, every one in the County, regardless of the City in which they reside or even in the unincorporated area, will incur a $.57 increase effective October 1, 1985. Mr. Henning asked that Waste Management provide them with the names of the other cities in the County to which they provide services. Mr. Allsworth answered: Davie, Plantation, Pompano Beach, Lauderhill, Sea Ranch Lakes, Hillsboro Beach, North Lauderdale, Lauderdale Lakes, a substantial portion of the unincorporated areas, a portion of the City of Fort Lauderdale and Tamarac. He said last year's increase was effective October 1, 1984 with BFI as the City's contractor. Mr. Allsworth stated when the disposal rate increased effective October 1, 1984, BFI filed a request asking for its passage whereby Council acted upon it and then KZ3 1 1 9/26/85 /vdw when Waste Management negotiated their contract, the increase that had been in effect for two or three months was built into the new contract as an addendum. He concluded that this is the first time that Waste Management has come before them during the term of the contract. Mr. Henning said they used the $16 per ton fee because they did not know what the increases would be and they had to get the bids out and back. He said it was the rate negotiated by BFI that was accepted by Waste Management when they came on board. Mr. Allsworth explained the disposal rate is what is paid for the use of the landfill and there has been an increase due to environmental requirements of the State and closure costs because both the County Landfill and Phase I of the North Broward Land- fill will be closed out within the foreseeable future. Tape V/M Massaro MOVED that TgLip. Reso_._#3781 be TABLED subject 8 to determining that the tipping fees are accurate and upon completion will have October 1 as the effective date. SECONDED by C/M Stein. VOTE: LEGAL AFFAIRS: ALL VOTED AYE 26 action rt Miller ment�oftthof TamaKac - Discussion and possible payment y' insurance attorneys (tabled from 9/11/85) SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED at the request of the City Attorney (See page 23) Mr. Henning asked that the item be TABLED. He said the requested language is located in paragraph 3(b) which stated that there is a deductible and the key language is that "it shall apply for damages which cannot be indemnified by the public entity named in Item (1) by reason of statutory or adjudicated prohibition thereof". The City Attorney reported that the attorneys' fees were attempted to be recovered but recovery was denied by ,judge Vitale. He said the question is the definition of "damages" and he will contact the insurance company for an explanation. V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE for a future meeting to allow the City Attorney additional time for research. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL -VOTED AYE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE FINANCIAL 49. Sewer U e i ance - Temp. Ord_._.#1216 - Discussion and possible action. SYNOPSIS OF_ACTION: TABLED to 9/30/85 (See Page 1) C/M Stein MOVED to TABLE d. 1216, for receipt of a copy of the ordinance, to the next regular meeting. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. V/M Massaro asked that it be TABLED to Monday's meeting inasmuch as they do not have more information because'Mr. Greenwood's memo specifically related to rates and asked that it be acted on right away. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 39 9/26/85 /vdw L/ BOARDS AND COMMITTEES: 50. Public Information Committeg - Discussion and possible action to announce a vacancy _SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Vacancy announced Agendized by consent (See page 1) Mayor Kravitz announced a vacancy on the Public Information Committee. 51. Beautification Committee -- Discussion and possible action to announce a vacancy SYNOPSIB QF_ ACTION: Vacancy announced Agendized by consent (See page 2) Mayor Kravitz announced a vacancy of an alternate on the Beautification Committee. LEGAL AFFAIRS 52. Engagement of Professi.Qngl Services to Handle the Steve Wood Lawsuit - Discussion and possible action SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED Alan Ruf to handle lawsuit and AUTHORIZED him to use the services of Mr. Gronda if and when he needs assistance. Agendized by consent (See Page 2) V/M Massaro MOVED that Mr. Ruf be assigned the case regarding the Steve Wood claim and that he be AUTHORIZED to use Mr. Gronda, if and when he needs him for the case. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. Y4TE: ALL_ VOTED _AYE GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL 53. L-and gelipp 7 - Lgnd urchase - Financ-ing - Discussion and possible action SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AUTHORIZED the Acting City Manager to use whatever funds are available to be replaced when bonds are issued. Agendized by consent (See page 2) 40 9/26/85 /vdw Mr. Henning said $842,000 is for the purchase of the 45 acres in Land Section 7 and the closing will be an said the indication is that Council can reaffirm y day othat w. Mit has been reallocated to bond proceeds and could be borrowed from either that fund or some other fund and then recovered from the bond Proceeds when the revenue bonds are sold and he stated that is what is being suggested. this V/M Massaro said, within the monies that would result from the amount of bond money that had been a money and it seemed to be the place to goat there is enough , and she so MOVED. C/M Stein added that the Acting City Manager use whatever funds are available until such time. V/M Massaro said to be replaced when the bond is sold. by C/M Stein. SECONDED VOTE . LL VQTED AYE 29. BBM Litiaatjon - Discussion and Possible on Of the latest invoice from Morgan, Lewis &ction Bocki,us.Payment Y P I OF ACTIO : APPROVED payment of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius' invoice in the amount of $22,816.62. Mr. Henning reported that he had received a letter and statement from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius outlining the latest efforts of the firm. Mr. Henning had reviewed the statement and felt comfort- able with the firms outline. V/M Massaro asked what the report meant that they received from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius last week and asked what was the confidential aspect about it that was discussed at the meeting a half hour after she received it. Mr. Henning answered that Frank Etheredge and Touche Ross were Persistent in trying to get an estimate from Morgan, Lewis & Bockius as to their proposed success as it related to the budget. The City Attorney said in the past the lawyers have been veryg reluctant to give the Citya but explained that becausofpthe eFinancefDirector'santisistc Morris Brown, who is the lead attorney for the firm, ssentaatence, letter to Mr. Etheredge and copied him. Mr. Henning said he felt the language contained information which he considered sensitive He said under recent amendments to the Public Records Law, the City is entitled to keep attorney/client exempt from the Public Records Lw; theefore,lheeplaced ea nod on the top that the material was considered attorney/note privilege and was not for public scrutin client stated he sent the letter to Council becauseTthey 1werettheney clients and explained that it involved insurance coverage, Projections on recovery and other things that he did not feel necessary to make public at this point. He said he did not furnish this information to the Clerk's Office and, for the record, he has not furnished information to the Clerk's Office twice. Mayor Kravitz asked if there was any reason why it should be kept t P V/M Massaro said it was in the papers every day_ Mr. Henning said he took a conservative approach Point, was more interested in the recovery than innsa, at this tisfying the curiosity of the public. The City Attorney said he would Prefer that it not go public and his advice is there is no reason to go public on what the insurance coverage is or the Projected percentage of recovery. V/M Massaro asked why was it brought up at the last meeting. 41 9/26/85 /vdw C/M Stein said he felt it would be self-evident that if the attorneys state that the City will recover, in their opinion, 40 to 50 percent and it becomes public data, it would hamper negoti- ations in the future. Morris Haber, Chairman/Charter Board, said the judge has ruled against Tamarac, along with other cities, as being specialized creditors, and in none of the cases is the City's attorneys mentioned because Mr. Tew seems to be doing all the talking for Tamarac. Mr. Henning said Tom Tew is the trustee who is trying to garner the assets for the ESM estate and does not represent the City. Vickie Beech, resident, questioned how much the City has already spent, and how much is the current bill. Mr. Henning answered, all total, less than $100,000. Vickie Beech said the only group that has benefitted are the lawyers. Ed Solomon, resident, said he would not pay them a penny more. C/M Stein MOVED that the invoice be paid. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. YDTE 0 ALL VOTED AYE 30. des. Walls and HOSes - d 1214 -w Discussion and possible action to amend Article V of Code Section 6-44 by removing the 7-foot setback restriction for corner lots on side streets in residential districts. First Reading. SYNOP I OF ACTION: TABLED to be advertised with other ordinances which need a 1/4 page ad. First Reading. Mr. Henning read T d. #1214 by title. V/M Massaro said this ordinance would give people better use of their yards, particularly in the area of Sunflower/Heathgate which are family sections and the yard is very important to them. She said they are losing seven feet of their yard and that a number of them have erected a fence and did not bother to get a permit but the conscientious ones who abide by the laws have asked for some relief on it. V/M Massaro said she saw no reason why they should not be allowed to do it but added that it has to go through normal procedures which requires a quarter page ad. She suggested that Council wait to accumulate additional requests V/M Massaro MOVED to TABLE. She said they would take one and the second one would wait until they have enough to put with it. V/M Massaro MOVED the APPROVAL on First Reading. Mr. Henning suggested that it be tabled and Council will have two after 5:00 P.M. hearings when enough has been received for adver- tisements. V/M Massaro WITHDREW the. MOTION for APPROVAL and MOVED to TABLE until they have more ordinances to advertise at the same time. SECONDED by C/M Stein. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE E [l 42 9/26/85 /vdw COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: 39. Woodmont Tract 59 - Temp. Reso. #3770„-- Discussion and possible action to approve Stipulation #24 concerning development of this property. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: REMOVED from agenda V/M Massaro MOVED that the item be REMOVED from the agenda. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. Mr. Henning said it was to be deferred to the Planning Commission. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 40. Woodmont Tracts 74/75 - Performance Bonds - Discussion and possible action on: a) Calling on a performance bond posted for public improve- ments associated with Site Plan #5 - Temp. Reso. #3773 b) Calling a performance bond posted for public improvements associated with Site Plan #6 - Temp. Reso. #3774 SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: REMOVED from agenda V/M Massaro requested REMOVAL of Temp. Reso. #3773 and Temp. Reso. #3774 from the agenda inasmuch as Mr. Foy has indicated that BonAire has amended their Letters of Credit. V/M Massaro MOVED its REMOVAL. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 41. Program Underwriters Building - Performance Bond - Temp. Reso. #3772 -- Discussion and possible action to call a bond posted for public improvements. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Resolution No. R-85-295 PASSED APPROVED and Engineering Department was directed to contact the responsible parties before the bond is called. Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3772 by title. V/M Massaro MOVED the APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #3772 and that the Engineering Department contact the responsible parties before the bond is called. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 43. Homeowners Warrant - Bond Release - Temp. Reso. #3771 Discussion and possible action to release a bond posted for construction defects for a home located on Lot 5, Block 3 of Heftler Homes SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED for Lot 5, Block 3 of Resolution No. 85--297 PASSED Heftler Homes Mr. Henning read TemQ_Reso. #3771 by title. V/M Massaro asked if the bond had met the required time for posting. 43 9/26/85 /vdw Mr. Henning said it was posted April 7, 1982 and the three years would expire April 7, 1985, and Bob Jahn, Chief Building Official, indicated that he has no record of any claims filed against the bond since it was posted. V/M Massaro MOVED the APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #3771. SECONDED by C/M Stein. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE Mayor Kravitz recessed the meeting until 5:05 P,M. PUBLIC HEARINGS - 5:05 P.M. - - - - - - - _ - - .. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: ABSENT: C/M Munitz Present C/M Gottesman Present V/M Massaro Present Mayor Kravitz Present C/M Stein ALSO PRESENT: Jon Henning, City Attorney Larry Perretti, Acting City Manager Carol E. Barbuto, Assistant City Clerk V. Diane Williams, Secretary Mayor Kravitz announced a Special Reconvened Council Meeting on Monday, September 30, 1985 at 9:30 A.M. 47. Fire Access Lanes - Temp. Or,d_..#1174 - Discussion and possible action to amend Chapter 15 of the Code to provide a penalty for parking in or obstructing fire access lanes and to amend Chapter 18 to provide specific requirements for these lands. Second Reading. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED Temp.. Ord._41174 ORDINANCE NO.85-43 PASSED on SECOND AND FINAL READING Public Hearing held Mr. Henning read Temp. Ord. #1174 by title. Mayor Kravitz opened the meeting to the public. Mr. Henning said there are two aspects to this ordinance: one has to do with providing requirements for fire access lanes and the various specifications; and the amendment of Chapter 15 which is the parking ordinance which indicates, among other things, that if a person parks in a fire access lane, it constitutes illegal parking and has the same provisions as other illegal parking and fines that are already in the City Code. C/M Munitz asked if the lanes would be marked as fire lanes. Mr. Henning said the commercial would be identified by a stripe and sign and the residential with just the sign. Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing to the public. V/M Massaro.,,MOVED,,,,the 4DOPTIONsof Temp. Ord. #1174 as revised on September 11`, 1985 on Second and Final Reading. SECONDED by C/M Gottesman. w N: VOTE: ALL.VOTED AYE 48. Off Street Parking Requirements - Temp. -Ord. #1205 - Discussion and possible action to amend Section 18-5(13) of 44 9/26/85 /vdw 11 Ll the Code to provide for more restrictive parking requirements for indoor athletic clubs and gymnasiums. Second Reading. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED Temp. Ord. #1205 ORDINANCE NO. 85-44 PASSED on Second and Final Reading Public Hearing held Mr. Henning read Temp. Ord.#1205 by title. Mr. Henning stated if a location, under the separate ordinance for nonconforming uses, has less than the 25% renovation, they are entitled to the nonconforming use and do not have to change. He said, however, if they do more than the 25% renovation, they would have to comply with the parking. The City Attorney said any new clubs would have to comply. 1 Mayor Kravitz opened the hearing to the public. Hearing no response, Mayor Kravitz closed the meeting to the public. V/M Massaro MOVED the adoption of Temp. -Ord._ #1205 AS REVISED August 12, 1985 on Second and Final Reading. SECONDED by C/M Munitz. VOTE: C/M Stein Absent C/M Munitz Aye C/M Gottesman Aye V/M Massaro Aye Mayor Kravitz Aye 46. City Attorney - No Report 47. Cit Mana er - No Report 44. City Council - C/M Stein - Absent C/M Munitz - No Report C/M Gottesman - No Report V/M Massaro - No Report Mayor Kravitz announced that he will call a workshop in October regarding BSO. Mayor Kravitz adjourned the meeting at 5:15 p.m. 4 WRAWWWWWRar" J 7.1 This public document was promulgated at a cost of $407.05or $ 11.31 per copy to inform the general public and public officers and employees about recent opinions and considerations by the City Council of the City of Tamarac. CITY OF TAMARAC APPR AT MEE ING OE �S City Cler 45 9/26/85 /vdw ATTACHMENT I TO ITEM 24. TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST - TEMP. RESO. #3765 SHEET 1 OF 0 Ply op a5to r, H Eo LA F. � TABLE 9 PROPOSED RATS 8CRIDULS ALTERNATIVE 8 20 NULTIPLE FAMILY SAR • 0.65 WATER $/KG • $0.80 SEWER $/KG $1.50 MAX SWR BILLEDt RESIDENTIAL i 15 KG BOA" ■NONE LOGTED OUTSIDE CITYt DO NOT ADD SUWjiAm SERVICE AVAILABILITY $ PER UNIT NETER SIZE 5/8 1 1.3 $ 6 SINGLE FAMILY WATER $4..63 PER UNIT, ALL NTR SIZE SEWER $4.90 PER UNIT. ALL MTR $ISO MULTIPLE FAMILY WATER $2.00 PER UNIT] ALL NTR 6199 SEWER $7.20 PER UNIT, ALL NTR $139 HOME OWIER ASSOCIATION WATER $4.65 $8.60 $15.10. $15.10 SEWER $4.90 $9.05 $15.95 . $15.95 COMMERCIAL V1ATER $4.75 $24.90 $71.85 $71.95 $1703.Oi $66.70 FEWER $7.10 $26.20 $75.70 $75.70 $1794.65 $91.40 IRRIQAT7ON WATER SP $10.70 PER UNIT, ALL MTR SIZE HOARF $26.05 $54.85 $54.85 ' CO?"ERC $18.15 $51.60 $90.70 $90.79 46 9/26/85 /vdw 1 I ATTACHEMNT I TO ITEM 24. TAMARAC UTILITIES'WEST - TEMP. RESO. #3765 SHEET.2 6 LEE r OF i to M a NN MN N NN [+fN r'M N NN NM r p d O pp �h NN Nam+ TP M Og o$ A M ... P M ♦ M♦ Phi C% O. A F M F M G N w � M O ♦ M O T M 0 0 N N NO• re r• w .+ w w w N .+ ...+ w .r p � A+ nS g S4► �� v�ir�i► a �� o�► � � �br► MO .O .+r V�-» �w .fir NN ♦N� � � 3 r j ♦ YI P O 1•f 02 .D ..n F A M 03 Y N op � I7 .D M w •r ♦ F 19 - w uft ri M V.- he 1- a ,� O N �Ii �11 O to O O N O .O .O O ♦♦M ♦ ae d' m D ♦ .O O W t�1 + M eq alp co m NS w �S H.p NN N 0201. �N 9 to ao�; .: ti� S c wM o o �•w �, ; N N Np Q OWN 10 .♦+aQ P♦ w NdN • ,,,• w .+ w .+ w .r .M a .2 y y NCO �O hQi P PM SNpa Y �wGrpr $66R"• �Oe. 'a"p.64 "�h.�''��' �W .a.h.Wpyw y p ww1 to FA �enx ones mvo� � Ey p1 � o�. U U a z • 47 9/26/85 /vdw ATTACHMENT I TO ITEM 24. TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST - TEMP. RESO. #3765 SHEET 3 OF 7 c� +r w M im a co !A /Y • r 06 V4 M C 4m O 0 a O off 00 o w r n M �f r r r•r w ns lift �► M N Kati to an N efta a ►� an o en to �a at co� cv ate► m M � M N I w O N rew « 0%W W A► M cm ow- AAM i4 i� f� r.i t4 Yh 4w f�F m w Arai fir.► Om Yf%D .7.a U ►h.w T' • ow ��0 M 1! M � N �I � w% L7 + .1 PM • • • • • j� � r. KoweMM �i rV r�/ •i r-* M� M � ri ar y a "► lift es ~~ lift soo h w .w es h h o of .w err M► raj w n u ~ • • lift r .r M� w • 0-0 qv r .r w �. • 1'. _ -»�My y•�Mi► ■ • "aa u~i a aG fiC x ac ac rc sc cxm� p 4W 1h, w�a 1•Etl INC a.3w 3ta •,.a � �sa .. AC 4C IA F+Ac AC O V +4• �• .� r. a q 48 9/26/85 /vdw .ATTA.CHMENT I. TO ITEM 24. TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST - TEMP. RESO. #3765 SHEET 4 OF 7 LIM Mi M.q Oi9drq =Lo =a„7.•J Qr aL ti Y rJ ]L ` �L •T 'OC N ` M � •-+ M � nrr � a. d M Q "'► m �, cat Q r4 Q M O � d Q W J in 4 a' OC ' F•- Ot CC OG 7a r■ H Co h Co .79 s •!'! N O M1 N t7 p v a a � to /� Or Cq w O p N 1+la: QD n l • dt! N rti M M N M fi[M 11N M wa Jr d }C r!f �► a p N y� t!t �D r+1 C• H9 ♦ M6 GC MNMN tf1 yr � O � .,� 7 6 - � N1p4��• �r+or Oo♦ M � �D H'► O► Y1 �O �D O p N 1► C'1r w » Y r rot r •O ON f� N7 rq r•'� to qr N y'1 M 10 M •A -• d , rw r► d p r"1 � O �J7 co tl CO I r4 N N • � 4c • • • • UM r•► 00 r • ft7 r•'i ow N ♦ N N r i • NMMM �l NM MMw-r OgOL7 F. ►� w O ?► •b w ~' w .-• .n r4 w •* H w cS 'O � r w 1 rwv«+ M go M M rA V► N � � r r'1 N ♦ N N 7d ` ]t J Vf M %� 40.... d QwQ awQD W N N J CC n n d u K me at h tMT M "lea pAY1•+�► M r►MM •� K p 06 "" 40 O �O A C7 N W w M p 'o %n Q N N O %O co Or N W CA • • • r � .� ♦ r■ ♦ N rr1 � M .w •i► N ♦ M u�F rN b r"7 ♦O�a� w O 0% ob w r r r%"0, •+ 40 M A M w w p O rrri+c� r w • • ....ewr ww�r►rw ws A O ■- ,p t 4M 1+ r %D a ow .. ov. 49 9/26/85 /vdw ATTACHMENT I TO ITEM 24. TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST - TEMP. RESO. #3765 SHEET F 7 y d c7 taJ LU to aC r sL aV7 1u r a[ rI-A -jw M r agor .-. d N N. r V&.... oc Oc 4Wis. d 0* CD w ►-. 4 r► 4cmW - N Vti J Oc V1t/tJ at W J Vf d tj d t.1 y ac cc ►- x a cu cc a r- z w Q H (Zf • F-- d h :a w M ur) Dic m F we [V a O rt J to �+ ••+ N u f ►O rti fD 10 GD .-t .+ • d . 1'► r► rr. rn M1 Q% %0 .- 00 . Ot �'► A �+ N .w tow yr .+ eh r� .rr .►r w r wf W N 4m M M k r to to a tfn %n a b a t0 N W it rhtTNNf+1r•M NaWM 'ram pf W to d to t0 r+ f•1 • Ph tD en co -0 r+ V)a NNNtV a Nmgr%► to M M M N A I'► A A N � A W cc N ... .•+ ... f•1 co -� owMawtlM t • pt tt"1 to C7 a CD A A !cf r► t* .-. n Kt •t lb • t/b i11 to M to r0 coo c7 •~ WA C7+f Nfnr rf � N N r'f A /•+ � tL1 O tL1 O O O t/1 �-+ a r a r•! tD a N t0 d A Yrf • Ot rf to "r f0 O► w m tb �. W r!f .A to to to .�+ N N «'1 . %* » to M N M N w .-r —Ln 'm o r o r+ a r s! cc to to ST M .-• to r'y r N +r W mCIO . . - N .-• .-+ t11 m to N .� w � A tss y • Nan M to fA .r fW Q* tr► Cl J a t•r "+PAP 1 M► .-r O a a 4 to trs • trf a .� N t7► Y to Mtl►M C7 ru r =14aaLo-j La W r ![ r S[�J W r 3d r A6 .J H 10 M co.r► r tw r rr H M 1 M r 6-16 w t to E %ft t� deM 4c tY► m= m to t1► H M a de • • t r LAJ fir[ at ae ■[ h— de f9p � w w 30 fr x M 1-- m IA t tt.r � = X 50 9/26/85 /vdw ATTACHMENT I TO ITEM 24. TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST - TEMP. RESO. #3765 SHEET 6 OF to•O .dr►n0 Anwmo4tonN m ry1'• O.-1r0 r4N 41OOw GG4}rr•• AD in r4o-4 � N en N •¢ f► nMt Or-P, O t!70nriwrgLn m N on �O ri b' Ot r-1 Ct ko o r% w I9M• 0 rl -4 1` cn ry M to r m e•l .1 t► r* C7 0 r- tD -4 N r-1 w cr r-i en U l r-I N Ct f?r• rO inrlP4rs c4qr -4CD� N ew to of r ert N 1r1 N t► N tD tl1 {- Ml C" V4 0 0 tAma Nt11nO'. Nf+tmNtANf"4 d�'0 rn r N r in V4 N N• r+4� tO'tti ON 1A1 , ;, a Q I .-I fm r-/ ey n 0% 0 e 4 to tD O Cl V'rr"t rlt'rtNtD r'1mwari0C4 ..ttD 1 � t0r41► mor4v ofNtommmm too N1,0% Ctr-Iwcn 0%%DCc Ommin rn10 cn on r 4 -w w r01 0-1rI rl' m m f r M 0 op N 1 +^I Y'f 0000.-INO 4 %OORr'r'O'fr1t0 C100 tf10a&A &n000•aAfO m t► co • • • CvtOmaP►orPr►lO• w w Mw 0; • Nw hMf• Ol• t• n• • ol: oa r'1 r4 ccnm wrrqm0% mmw NaAo .4V-4(no►!r(4��,4rd"r N N r r atNOP4IYrt+ 1"•O0.0m ln©r r�+rtl t�ntAm tOu11�0i+1D1401,4 0In • • • • m • • • • • • . • • • • • . AAM► :%Dom tpOt-tDr'rt+1r•m/' tnm ;r:V: " r-tnrlr�r+�+a4rt Y1rlwNawaD P1rlinrlNr%NF4 aI'1Mt r!►rlm tDNor)womry•D 'DQ A rl r 4 rl rl N W rl •N1 O ry I� 1N'1 r dP r4 rl 1A w t0 Nr:N r4 rl(V N M, r-/ e+Y ttrt+ m ew N r • M . 4 4s of Mt t� b1 v► A O r n O In a rl' M' P, p. m r1 Wr-t . . . • • . • . eat►rI•+r+Ar Amr•t~r-;w-lt+a f~ t► rvmC, rrlr4MrorIto anr-414 % w• r+1CYt/'fOtiNnr+ �OW►•0 rlmrN '� N!e�rf ry"mImpvmvrr4 -4"W � m to rF 04 rt rl � rl at en 0-6 -N +-I r1 r♦ N Mf t N aln oC2t/1M W t+P4t�t 'WMC2r W 0 pllp * - �ylmm�yrrl rtpa? • • . . • • • w . • • • • • • • • • • • tAtClNrrlItA aWOt04VMrmw—m 171 ¢trrltD 01nNmNrlrl OttDr N1DN1NH1tp1✓ r•4Ir IOfr•iN1IANY1 N NenNiD N�mrtormU1 e%C*W .� .� fn WO V t0 x ur0t � l U Z 4 C%l rf1�%aCN�K-W Vi�! rl �1d a a aWw rN xauqxwc+°a� w.c uu2wou„inw.cnw=m� �Qrai onagm18M � owas 0 Cwo avaHth IE 51 9/26/85 /vdw TO ITEM 24. ATTACHMENT I TAMARAC UTILITIES WEST - TEMP. RESO. SHEET 7 OF 7 7 10 Y M ■ do b- Jr t W J► zx C>! C W LL Y v k> G **a C W d 1~ A S r go W M* wf O -0 116 d� MM � J as t 6-00 w h M »u as ae W r F N �^ J iy J � w 7H .J H a 0 z 1A/ d at W - d #3765 •A 01 w M r.-. Cal r 4 M W 4 •A CO W d M m d t/1 J N J CC 44 J N CC ce M OC OC 1- 2 cr 0 I.- 4 N O Q F- O -cc O Vl V> 31 1.- i; V• :a 0- AM cy It co co co % • M .A .-► co { r+r �r►O •NN • w^• Yi K! N ab 0. CO .-• M 00 K S7 G Cop W O Ln •-+ •O C? O AM co P•9 C► � 1!O: .-+ N O 4 N9 %a -4 . N N N .f1 r r+ tin wb w too M M M A 4F • M. O U1 O• � ■ b7 CD %0 4► w,# •T �O .r d I'. C•'f CV aD G• r err �. r •a w 4► 4w M Y • rf .� w en r C'A r t M•A M •A O • O .-. H9 r. N w •r c O co • ► M Yh �, to ac `J" 4 J X C9 J to � � ]d ..1 - � 7C J � � le J a' M ;. to M c r• at d .A m at d V► m Y 14 M m V1 V1 V1 J J fa ac d d 4 S rC Vl CIK 1-- L1C 1'+ S P � � T 1••• C? U O at sic a � ►- at � ►- a ae r- � 52 9/26/85 /vdw