HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-10-24 - City Commission Regular Meeting Minutesof rAA,
u I n
I'D
P.O. BOX 25010
7AIVIARAC, FLORIDA 33320
FIRST CLASS MAIL
CITY OF TAMARAC
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
WEDNESDAY. OCTOBER 24. 1984
CALL TO ORDER: 9:00 A.M.
ANNOUNCEMENTS OF TIME ALLOCATIONS - MOTIONS TO TABLE - The Chair
at this time will announce those items which have been given a
specific time to be heard, and will entertain motions from
Council members to table those items which require research.
Council may agendize by majority consent matters of an urgent
nature which have come to Council's attention after publication.
PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
1. Employee Service _Awards - Presentation by City Manager
Johnson of a ten-year pin to Mary Falor of the Police Depart-
ment and five-year pins to Norma Bairan, John Bragg, Bob
Charlton, Tom Gagnon, John Harvey, Ed Krouse, Angela LoSasso,
Jim McAllister, John Monek, Jim O'Brien, Karen Pooley, Sol
Rosenheck, Lonnie Scott, Hollie Solomon, Ernest Sullivan and
Robert Woelke of Utilities West.
2. City of Hope - Presentation by Mayor Kravitz of a proclamatio
designating the week of November 15 to November 20, 1984, as
"Tag Week for the City of Hope".
3. Crime Stoppers Program - Presentation by Mayor Kravitz of a
proclamation designating November 3, 1984, as "Crime Stoppers
Day".
4. Senior Citizens Olympics - Presentation by Mayor Kravitz of a
.proclamation designating November, 1984, as "Senior Citizens
Olympics Month".
10/24/84 --
page 3 - City
Mgr. presente
pins.
1.0/24/84 -pg3
Presentation
by Mayor Krav
page 3 -Prese
by Mayor
Kravitz
10/24/84 -
page 2 -
Presentation
Mayor Kravi.ti
5. Jewish War Veterans of the U.S.A. - Announcement of presenta- 10/24/84 Pg 2
tion by Mayor Kravitz of a proclamation to Edward Goldberg Presented at
Post 519 and Ladies Auxiliary designating the week of Edw/ Goldberg
November 4, 1984, as "Poppy Days". Post 519
6. Multiple Sclerosis - Announcement of presentation by Mayor
Kravitz of a proclamation designating October 22, 1984, as
"Multiple Sclerosis Day".
BOARDS AND COMMITTEES
1U/24/84 -Pg
Presentation
Mayor at a mt
of represents
tives.
.0
7. Board of Social Services - Temp. Reso. #3220 - Discussion and TABLED
possible action to appoint one (1) member (tabled from
10/10/84). 10 24 84 Pg
8. Board of__Adjustment - Temp. Reso. #3314 - Discussion and pos-
TABLED
sible action to appoint one (1) alternate member (tabled from
10/10/84).
FAG TWO
9. Investment Advisory Committee - Discussion and possible actia 10/24/04 Page
on: 3 & 4 - vacan
a) Announcement of one vacancy. announce"-rpt
b) Report/recommendations recomm. tc be
given latEx
10. Burglar Alarm Review Committee - Announcement of one vacancy. 10/24/84 Pg 4
vacancy annou
If anyone is interested in serving on the above committees, application
please contact the City Clerk's office for an application. from City Clk
CONSENT AGENDA
11. Items listed under Item #11, Consent Agenda, are viewed to be
routine and the recommendation will be enacted by one motion
in the form listed below. If discussion is desired, then
the item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will
be considered separately.
a)
Minutes of
9/11/84 - Special Meeting
- Approval recommend-
ed by City
Clerk.
b)
Minutes of
9/11/84 - Special Meeting
Budget Hearings
(10:30 A.M..)
- Approval recommended
by City Clerk.
c)
Minutes of
9/11/84 - Special Meeting
Budget Hearings
(5:05 P.M.)
- Approval recommended by
City Clerk.
d)
Minutes of
9/12/84 - Regular Meeting
- Approval recommend-
ed by City
Clerk.
e)
Minutes of
9/14/84 - Special Meeting
- Approval recommend-
ed by City
Clerk.
f)
Minutes of
9/17/84 - Special Meeting
Approval recommend-
ed by City
Clerk.
g)
Minutes of
9/19/84 - Special Meeting
Approval recommend-
ed by City
Clerk.
h)
Alan F. Ruf
- Consulting City Attorney - 10/18/84 -
$1,143.00 -
Approval recommended by City Attorney.
i)
Mitchell Ceasar
- Grants Consultant
- Retainer for
October, 1984
- $1,250.00 - Approval
recommended by City
Manager.
j) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Consulting Engineer -
Project 1710-13, Statement 8 - 9/21/84 - TUW Annual
Report - $3,022.90 - Approval recommended by Finance
Director.
k) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Termination Notice for
consulting services for the City - Approval to remove this
item from the agenda (tabled from 7/25/84).
1) Shailer, Purdy & Jolly - Counsel for contraband forfei-
tures - Services for September, 1984 - $484.91 - Approval
recommended by City Attorney.
m) Board of County Commissioners - Approval of the following
invoices as recommended by the Finance Director:
1) Invoice 12960, Payment 7, 10/1/84 - $30,647.64 -
Agreement for relocation of pipe along Commercial
Boulevard between the Turnpike and State Road 7.
2) Invoice 12961, Payment 7, 10/1/84 - $43,370.62 -
Agreement for relocation of pipe along Commercial
Boulevard between the Turnpike and NW 61 Avenue.
iu/ aK/ aM -
Page 4,5
APPROVED item
a) thru n )
PAGE THREE
n) Municipal Complex - Temporary funding of architectural
phase - Approval that $100,000.00 from line item account
number 001-872--581-901 of the budget named Contingency
be transferred to line item account number 001-179-519-311
named Architectural Services. The balance in the account
from which the monies are transferred was $497,000.00
prior to the transfer and $397,000.00;subsequent to the
transfer. The amount of money in the account to which the
monies are to be transferred was -0- prior to the transfer
and $100,000.00 subsequent to the transfer.
This is NOT an approval to pay any invoice; individual
invoices will be presented to the Council for approval.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
12. Utilities West - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Biofil.ter Construction - Request by E & A Environmental
Consultants, Inc., for payment under contract.
b) Approval to obtain bids for installation of a lime sludge
retaining wall in order to obtain additional storage
capacity.
c) Authorization for a secondary contract with Lynn Ro Con-
struction, Inc., to clean the lime sludge holding pits on
an emergency basis.
d) Sewage Treatment Plant Effluent Disposal Alternatives:
1) Presentation by James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers
and adoption of their report.
2) Payment to James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers for
services rendered for the period of 7/31/84 to 8/25/84
in the amount of $3,280.00.
e) Professional negotiations with consulting engineering firms
concerning wastewater disposal.
13. Fluoridation of Water System - Discussion and possible actio
regarding a request from the State Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services for the City to participate in a
funded program to fluoridate the drinking water (tabled from
10/10/84).
1.4. Emer2ency Medical Services - Temp. Reso. #3338 - Discussion
and possible action to approve execution of a lease with
Medics Ambulance Service for non-exclusive use of Fire
Station #2.
15. Emergency Services -µ Discussion and possible action to
authorize the City Manager to investigate the feasibility of
a computerized system for medical emergencies, fires or
burglaries.
LO/24/84 pg29
30, 31, 32 a) no
iot to exceed
$10,000 b)
Jtility Dir.
Dbtain bids c
Jtility Dir.
to enter Sec.
:7ontract with
Lynn Ro Const
31)adopt rept
Df J.M.Montgo
d2)APPROVED
e)Adopt ranki
of staff,auth
staff to negc
and return tc
Council.
lU/24/64 pgza
n27 - C/A,C/E,
C/M to report
from State De
of Health &
Rehab.
10/24/84 pg 1
APPROVED
10/24/84 pg ]
& 17 C/M autl
to investigat
computerized
system.
16.
Building Department
- Discussion and possible action to
10/24/84 pg ]
approve the
City Manager's recommendation for the appointment
APPROVED Robt
of a Chief Building
Official (tabled from 10/10/84).
Jahn as CBO
17.
Surplus Law
Books - Reso. #3339 - Discussion and pos-
10/24/84 pgl7
sible action
_Temp.
to approve the sale of American Jurisprudence
APPROVED $40_1
Practice and
Pleadings, Second Edition.
plus shippinc
18.
Tamarac Park
- Discussion and possible action on proposed
10/24/84 pg
new parking
lot.
TABLED to
11/14 meetinc
19.
Sister City
Project - Status report regarding agreements
10724/84 pg `
with Kiryat
Tivon. Discussion and possible action.
6 - Status
�Rept.
given
PAGE
FOUR
20.
Grants - Status .report by Mitchell Ceasar, Grants Consultant
10/24/84 pg 5
Discussion and possible action.
report by
Mitch Ceasar
21.
Broward County League of Cities Business - Discussion and
Reconv. Mtg.
possible action on: —._— —
10/30/84 pg
a) Payment of City dues for the year beginning 10/1/84.
b) Reports.
10/24784 pg 4,
LEGAL
AFFAIRS
15 TABLED for
City Atty. to
22.
City_Council Chambers - Discussion and possible action con-
get more mean-
cerning Resolution 84-314 which declared that the public
ingful Reso.
address system shall be in use for all meetings held in the
Chambers.
84 pg 1
23.
City Council Meeting Procedures - Temp. Reso. #3340 -- Dis-
TABLED to
cussion and possible action to provide a procedure for publi
ll/14/84 mtg.
input on non-public hearing items at Council meetings.
24.
City Council Liars
y on Positions - Temp. Reso. #3341 - Dis-
10/24/84 pg 15
.. ...--- _
cussion and possible action to designate Council members to
APPROVED as
serve in positions of liaison to City committees, special
amended
projects and governmental entities outside the City.
25.
Street and Traffic Study - Status report on selection of
Reconv. Mtg.
consulting engineers to perform the traffic study required
10/30/84 pg 2
in order to establish a Street and Trafficways Signalization
Impact Fee proposed by Temp. Ord. #1049. Discussion and pos-
sible action.
26. Municipal Parking _ g Lot at Utilities East - Discussion and pos
sible action regarding parking leases at this location.
r
27. Site Development Plan Review Fees - Temp. Ord. #1135 - Dis-
cussion and possible action to create Section 7-4(d) of the
Code granting religious organizations a partial exemption
from these fees. First Reading. (tabled from 10/10/84).
28. Commercial Vehicle Parking in Residential Areas - Temp. Ord.
#1141 - Discussion and possible action to amend Section
15-6(b) of the Code concerning definitions of commercial and
recreational vehicles, boats andboat trailers which are
subject to parking restrictions. First Reading.
29. Auctions of Surplus Equipment - Ted. Ord. #1147 - Dis-
cussion and possible action to amend Section 9-41 of the
Code to provide for publicly noticed auctions of surplus
City Equipment. First Reading.
30. Offer to Sell Acreage to City -- Discussion and possible
action on an offer to sell to the City approximately 18-acre
of land located on the east side of. University Drive between
Southgate Boulevard and the C-14 Canal.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 2:00 P.M.
31. Sign Ordinance - Temp. Ord. #1143 - Discussion and possible
action to amend Chapter 21 of the Code relating to signs.
Second Reading.
Reconv. Mtg.
10/30/84 pg 3
APPROVED
RECONV. MTG.
10/30/84 pg3 s
4 DENIED
Reconv. Mtg.
10/30/84 pg 4
PPROVED
0/30/84 Recor
tg. page 5
PPROVED on
irst Reading
0/30/84 Recor
tg. page 5
ouncil not
nterested.
10/24/84 pgl7,
18,19 APPROVET
on Second and
Final Reading
as revised
10/19/84
PAGE FIVE
32. _Bruce Egan - Rezoning Petition #27-Z-84 - Temp. Ord. #1148 - pg 9-
Discussion and possible action to rezone lands at the south- 25, Public
east corner of University Drive and NW 64 Street, extending Hearing - a)
eastward to the western boundary of Vanguard Village and Accepted b)
southerly to St. Malachy Church property, from R-3 (Low DENIED
Density Multiple Dwelling) to B-2 (Planned Business) and S-1
(Open Space/Recreational). First Reading.
a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of Mail-
ing and Affidavit of Posting.
b) Consideration of application.
10/24/84 pg25,
33.
Donald T. Sutte - Rezoning Petition #28-Z-84 - Temp. Ord.
26 - Public
#1149 - Discussion and possible action to rezone lands on the
Hearing -a)
north side of Commercial Boulevard and east of the southern
Accepted b)
terminus of the "S-curve" of NW 57 Street, extending north-
APPROVED on
ward to the Fountain Apartments, from R-3 (Low Density
First Reading
Multiple Dwelling) to B-5 (Limited Business District). First
Reading.
a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of Mail-
ing and Affidavit of Posting.
b) Consideration of application.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RECONV. MTG.
34.
Finalization of items from the 10/10/84 Council meeting -
10/30/84 pg 7
APPROVED a)
Discussion and possible action on:
a) Borgia Hair Designers - Sign Waiver - Temp. Reso. #3361 -
thru d)
Affirming Council's approval of 16-inch letters on the
second line of a wall sign.
b) Texaco Service Station - Temp. Reso. #3362 - Affirming
Council's approval of a waiver of the platting process in
advance of the presentation of a site plan.
c) NW 57 Street and NW 88 Avenue Traffic Light - Temp. Reso.
#3363 - Urging Broward County to install a traffic signal
at this intersection.
d) Land Use Plan Amendments - Adoption of the following by
Temp. Reso,. #3337:
1) Land Uses for Land Section 7
2) Regulation and permitted Uses in:
(a) Major Research Office Employment Base Activities
(b) Warehouse/Distribution
3) Four local land use revisions
10/24/84 pg 3,
35.
Mobil Oil Com2any - Southwest corner of Commercial Boulevard
i 35 a)APPROVEI
and State Road 7 - Discussion and possible action on:
as amended b)—
a) Request for permanent platting waiver - Temp._ Reso. #3345
APPROVED
b) Revised Site Plan for a ground sign - Temp. Reso #3331
(tabled from 10/10/84).
10/24/84 pg35
36.
Mobil Oil Company - Northeast corner of Commercial Boulevard
) APPROVED
and State Road 7 - Discussion and possible action on:
dith condition:
a) Site Plan - Temp. Reso. #3325
) APPROVED
b) Water Retention Agreement
(tabled from 10/10/84).
4 84 pg12
37.
Brookwood Plaza - Revised Site Plan - Temp Reso. #3357 -
&13, APPROVED
Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan for a
vith Condition:
temporary drive.
Q 24 84 pg 1
38.
Lake Colony/Brookwood Gardens - Revised Site Plan - Te_ mp.
PPROVED
Reso. #3358 - Discussion and possible action on a revised
site plan to amend the minimum rear setbacks.
PAGE
SIX
39.
Family 7 Grocery Store (formerly Majik_Market at 1503 NW
ECONV. MTG.
0/30/84 pg7,8
44 Street - Pras�ect Road) - Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso.
#3355 - Discussion and possible action on a revised site
PPROVED with
plan for a ground sign.
onditions
CONV. MTG.
40.
Bud's Carpet and Tile - Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso.
#3359 - Discussion and possible action on a revised site
0/30/84 pg4,5
PPROVED subj.
plan for a ground sign,
o conditions
0 24 84 pg 12
41.
Tamarac Market Place - Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso.
PPROVED with
#3360 - Discussion and possible action on a revised site
onditions
plan for Chicken Unlimited and for relocation of a ground
sign.
0/24/84 pg32-
42.
Sabal Palm Golf Course -- Presentation by the developer con-
34 TABLED to a
cerning proposed Land Use Plan Revisions and development
plans for three parcels in the golf course. Discussion and
workshop mtg.
on. 11/2/84
possible action.
0/24/84 pg 13
43.
Woodmont Tract 74/75 - Discussion and possible action on:
)APPROVED b)
a) Revision to Site Plan #5 reflecting revision to various
PPROVED with
unit widths, addition of one unit and adjustment of
onditions
parking - Tem Reso. #3364
b) Amendment to Water and Sewer Developers Agreement.
44.
FP&L Phoenix Substation Pra ect - Status report b Y City
Project P y
Planner concerning consideration by Broward County of two
proposed Land Use Plan Amendments. Discussion and passible
action.
0 24/84 pg 13,
45.
Woodmont Plaza - Temp. Reso. #3342 - Discussion and possible
14 DENIED pg 2!
action to amend a Special Exception granted to ,lack Lalanne
29 APPROVED
Health and Fitness Center regarding expansion of facility.
with condition.
i.
0 24/84 pg6--1:
46.
Concord Villa e II - Discussion and possible action on:
)b)c) APPROVEI
a) Request by Shell Oil Company to extend approval of the
final site plan - Temp. Reso._#3343
b) Request by Dinerstein Company for approval of a Revised
Site Plan to reflect the following changes by Tem . Reso.
# 3 3 4 4 :
1) Waiver of the 20-wfoot berm along NW 88 Avenue
2) From condominium to rental project
3) From Adult to Open Community with a maximum of 24 unit
4) Reducing three buildings from three stories to one
story on the south side of NW 61 Street
c) Assignment of the Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
CONV. MTG.
47.
Isles of Tamarac - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Release of cash performance band posted for the perimeter
0/30/84 pg 8
PABLED
road swales - Temp. Reso. #3346
b) Amendment to Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
CONV. MTG.
48.
Heftler Homes - Performance Bond - Temp. REso. #3347 - Dis-
cussion and possible action to call a performance bond
0/30/84 pg 8
APPROVED
posted for installation of sidewalks.
CONV. MTG.
49,
Mission Lakes/Southgate Gardens East -- Warranty Bond - Tem2.
Reso. #3348 - Discussion and possible action to call a
0/30/84 pg 8
PPROVED
warranty bond posted for public improvements.
-.-----.-----.-----
CONV. MTG.
50.
Woodmont Maintenance. Area - Discussion and possible action
0/30/84 pg 9
on;
PPROVED
a) Release of a performance bond posted for public improve-
ments subject to a receipt of a one-year warranty bond -
Reso. #3349
_Temp.
b) Acceptance of Bill of Sale for a water main and fire
hydrant - Temp. Reso. #3350
c) Acceptance of Water Main and Fire Hydrant Maintenance
Easement - Temp. Reso. #3351
PAGE SEVEN
51. Woodmont Tract 56 Sales Center - Discussion and possible RECONV. MTG.
action on: 10/30/84 pg 10
a) Release of a performance bond posted for public improve- APPROVED
ments subject to receipt of a one-year warranty bond -
Temp. Reso. #3352
b) Acceptance of Bill of Sale for fire hydrant - Temp. Reso.
#3353
52. Professional Forms
Building - Bond Release - Tem ReRECONV. MTG.
so. 10/30/84 pg 10
#3354 Discussion and possible action to release a perform -APPROVED
ante bond posted for public improvements subject to receipt
of a one-year warranty bond. _____..----___-
RECONV. MTG.
53. _Wellens Furniture Company - Si n Waiver - Temp. Reso. #3356--10/30/84 pg 10
Discussion and possible action to renew a sign waiver for a APPROVED to
ground directional sign west of the entrance driveway at ;1/•28/8`
3801 W. Commercial Boulevard,
REPORTS
54. City Council
12
55. City Manager RECONV. MTG.
10/30/84__pg_ 11_
56. City Attorney RECONV. MTG.10/30/84 pq 11
PTJB1JC HEARINGS - 5 : 0 5 P.M. 10/24/84 pg 36
57. Moratorium in Land Section 7 - Temp. Ord. #11.40 - Discussion Public HearingAPPROVED Temp.
and possible action to continue a moratorium on developments Ord. #1140 on
designated as industrial, on the Lend Use Plan in Land Second and
Section 7. Second Reading. Final Reading
58. Special Exception Provisions - Tem . Ord. #1133 - Discussion
l0 24/84 pg 36
& 37 Public
and possible action to create Section 28-86.1 of the Code Hearing APPROVI
to permit a special exception for four. (4) story structures Temp Ord #1133
in R-4A zoning districts. Second Reading, on Second and
- - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - _ Final Hearing.
City Council may consider and act upon such other business as may
come before it.
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person
decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with
respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he mayneed to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings
is made which .record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is based.
CITY OF TAMARAC
arC olA. Evans
Assistant City Clerk
WORKSHOP MEETINGS
10/31/84
- 9:30 A.M. - Procedures for Committees
10/.31/84
-11:00 A.M. Charter Review Committee
1.0/31/84
- 1.:00 P.M. Expenses for Committees
10/31/84
- 3:00 P.M. - District Voting
r
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 24, 1984
Tape 1 CALL_TO-OR12E: Mayor Kravitz called the meeting to order on
Wednesday, October 24, 1984, at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers
of City Hall.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Philip B. Kravitz
Vice Mayor Sydney M. Stein
Councilman Jack Stelzer
Councilman Raymond J. Munitz
Councilman Allan C. Bernstein
ALSO -PRESENT: Elly F. Johnson, City Manager
Jon M. Henning, City Attorney
Carol A. Evans, Assistant City Clerk
Patricia Marcurio, Secretary
- Mayor Kravitz called for a
Moment of Silent Meditation followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
Mayor Kravitz made an official statement that the policy of his
administration, and the platform on which they were elected, was
the promise that Council would listen to the people. He said in
order to keep this promise, they expect the public to address the
issue under discussion when recognized by the Chair in order for
Council to conduct its business efficiently. He said the Chair
requests the cooperationof the public in this regard.
23. - Temp- Reso. #3340
Discussion and possible action to provide a procedure for
public input on non --public hearing items at Council meetings
UNOPSiS OF ACTIQN: TABLED to
the 11/14/84 meeting.
V/M Stein MOVED to TABLE this item to the 11/14/84 meeting,
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
kvi6o _.
�!j:j�j 012'?,11 WA M
18. Tamarac Park - Discussion and possible action on proposed
new parking lot.
SYNOPSIS QF__A ION: TABLED to
the 11/14/84 meeting.
C/M Stelzer MOVED to TABLE this item to the 11/14/84 meeting,
SECONDED by V/M Stein.
7. v _ - Discussion
and possible, action to appoint one (1) member (tabled from
10/10/84).
1
10/24/84
/pm
J
J
C/M Bernstein said
Committee to TABLE
V/M Stein.
VOTE
he has a request from the Chairman of this
this item and he so MOVED, SECONDED by
8. o o me - 4 -- Discussion and
possible action to appoint one (1) alternate member (tabled
from 10/10/84).
V/M Stein MOVED to TABLE this item, SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VOTED -AY
59. tera s Affairs Committee - Announcement of one vacancy on
this committee.
Agendized by Consent.
(See Page
Mayor Kravitz requested agendizing by consent announcement of a
vacancy on the Veterans Affairs Committee and V/M Stein so MOVED,
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
4. - Presentation by Mayor Kravitz of
a proclamation designating November, 1984, as "Senior
Citizens Olympics Month".
Sy,NQPSIS OF ACTION: Proclamation will
be mailed to Carol Block, representative
of the Senior Citizens Olympics.
Mayor Kravitz announced that a proclamation designating November,
1984, as "Senior.Citizens Month".will be mailed to Carol Block,
representative of the Senior Citizens Olympics.
5.War Ve-terang o - Announcement of
presentation by Mayor Kravitz of a proclamation to Edward
Goldberg Post 519 and Ladies Auxiliary designating the week
of November 4, 1984, as "Poppy Days".
,Sy._NOPSTS OF ACT.: Mayor Kravitz
presented this proclamation at a
meeting of Edward Goldbert Post 519.
Mayor Kravitz said he presented a proclamation designating the
week of 11/4/84, as "Poppy Days" at a meeting of the Edward
Goldberg Post 519.
6. -- Announcement of presentation by Mayor
Kravitz of a proclamation designating October 22, 1984, as
"Multiple Sclerosis Day".
SYNOPSIS OF ACT.LU: Mayor Kravitz
presented this proclamation at a
meeting of their representatives.
Mayor Kravitz said he presented
10/22/84, as "Multiple Sclerosis
representatives.
OA
a proclamation designating
Day" at a meeting of their
10/24/84
/pm
1. Smployee_ServiceAwards - Presentation by City Manager
Johnson of a ten-year pin to Mary Falor of the Police
Department and five -"year pins to Norma Bairan, John Bragg,
Bob Charlton, Tom Gagnon, John Harvey, Ed Krouse, Angela
LoSasso, Jim McAllister, John Monek, Jim O'Brien, Karen
Pooley, Sol Rosenheck, Lonnie Scott, Hollie Solomon, Ernest
Sullivan and Robert Woelke of Utilities West.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: City Manager
Johnson presented the pins.
Tom Gagnon, Ed Krouse, Jim McAllister,
John Monek and Sol Rosenheck of Utilities
west were unable to attend the meeting to
receive their five-year pins.
City Manager Johnson presented a ten-year pin to Mary Falor and
five-year pins to Norma Bairan, John Bragg, Bob Charlton, John
Harvey, Angela LoSasso, Jim O'Brien, wren Pooley, Lonnie Scott,
Hollie Solomon, Ernest Sullivan and Robert Woelke of Utilities
West.
Tom Gagnon, Ed Krouse, Jim McAllister, John Monek and Sol
Rosenheck of Utilities West were unable to attend the meeting to
receive their five-year pins.
2. City gHope -- Presentation by Mayor Kravitz of a proclama-
tion designating the week of November 15 to November 20,
1984, as "Tag Week for the City of Hope".
SYNOPSIS OF ACTIQK: Mayor Kravitz
presented the proclamation to
Annette Horwitz, representative of
the City of Hope.
Mayor Kravitz presented a proclamation designating the week of
11/15 to 11/20/84, as "Tag Week for the City of Hope" to Annette
Horwitz, representative of the City of Hope.
3. Crime Stoppers Program -- Presentation by Mayor Kravitz of a
proclamation designating November 3, 1984, as "Crime
Stoppers Day".
SYNOP-qTS OF ACTZQN: Mayor Kravitz
presented the proclamation to
Polly Wilkie, representative of
the Crime Stoppers Program.
Mayor Kravitz presented a proclamation designating 11/3/84, as
"Crime Stoppers Day" to Polly Wilkie, representative of the Crime
Stoppers Program.
9. Iavestment Advisory_CQmmjtteg - Discussion and possible
action on:
a) Announcement of one vacancy
b) Report/recommendations
SYNOPSIS OF ACTIQN:
a) Mayor Kravitz announced one vacancy
on this committee and encouraged
anyone interested get an application
from the City Clerk's office.
b) Report and recommendations will be
given at a future time.
Q
10/24/84
/pm
M
a) Mayor Kravitz announced one vacancy on this committee and en-
couraged anyone interested get an application from the City
Clerk's office.
b) Mayor Kravitz said he received a memo from the Chairman stating
that a report will be made at a future time.
10. Blir != Alarm_ Review _Commi-tt-ee ,- Announcement of one
vacancy.
SXNQPSIS OF ACTION: Mayor Kravitz
announced one vacancy on this
committee and urged interested
parties get applications
from the City Clerk's office.
Mayor Kravitz announced one vacancy on this committee and urged
interested parties get applications from the City Clerk's office.
59. VeteKana Affairs Coni,ttee - Announcement of one vacancy .on
this committee.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Consent.
(See Page
Mayor Kravitz announced one vacancy on
this committee and urged anyone interested
get applications from the City Clerk's
office.
Mayor Kravitz announced one vacancy on this committee and urged
anyone interested get applications from the City Clerk's office.
a)
Minutes of 9/11/84 - Special
Meeting - Approval recommended
by
City Clerk.
b)
Minutes of 9/11/84 - Special
Meeting Budget. Hearings (10:30
A.M.) - Approval recommended
by City Clerk.
c)
Minutes of 9/11/84 - Special
Meeting Budget Hearinga (5:05
P.M.) - Approval recommended
by City Clerk.
d)
Minutes of 9/12/84 - Regular
Meeting - Approval recommended
by
City Clerk.
e)
Minutes of 9/14/84 -- Special
Meeting - Approval recommended
by
City Clerk.
f)
Minutes of 9/17/84 - Special
Meeting - Approval recommended
by
City Clerk.
g)
Minutes of 9/19/84 - Special
Meeting -- Approval recommended
by
City Clerk.
h)
Alan F. Ruf - Consulting City
Attorney - 10/18/84 - $1,143.00-
Approval recommended by City
Attorney.
i)
Mitchell Ceasar - Grants Consultant
- Retainer for October,
1984 - $1,250.00 -- Approval
recommended by City Manager.
j)
Williams, Hatfield & Stoner,
Inc. -- Consulting Engineer -
Project 1710-13, Statement 8
- 9/21/84 - TUW Annual Report
-
$3,022.90.-- Approval recommended
by Finance Director.
k)
Williams, Hatfield & Stoner,
Inc. - Termination Notice for
consulting services for the
City - Approval to remove this
item from the agenda (tabled
from 7/25/84)
1)
Shailer, Purdy & Jolly - Counsel
for contraband forfeitures
--
Services for September, 1984
- $484.91 -- Approval recommended
by City Attorney.
4
10/24/84
/pm
J
m) Board of County Commissioners - Approval of the following
invoices as recommended by the Finance Director:
1) Invoice 12960, Payment 7, 10/1/84 - $30,647.64 -
Agreement for relocation of pipe along Commercial
Boulevard between the Turnpike and State Road 7.
2) Invoice 12961, Payment 7, 10/1/84--$43,370.62 -
Agreement for relocation of pipe along Commercial
Boulevard between the Turnpike and NW 61 Avenue.
n) Municipal Complex - Temporary funding of architectural phase -
Approval that $100,000.00 from line item account number
001-872-581-901 of the budget named Contingency be trans-
ferred to line item account number 001-179-519-311 named
Architectural Services. The balance in the account from which
the monies are transferred was $497,000.00 prior to the
transfer and $397,000.00 subsequent to the transfer. The
amount of money in the account to which the monies are to be
transferred was -0- prior to the transfer and $100,000.00
subsequent to the transfer. This is NOT an approval to pay
any invoice; individual invoices will be presented to the
Council for approval.
SYNOPSIS OF ;ACTION: APPROVED
Items a) through n).
C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of Items a) through n), SECONDED by
V/M Stein.
VOTE ALL VOTED,_ ;}AYE
GENERATE ADM NISTRAT1YEZ INANCIAL
20. Grants -- Status report by Mitchell Ceasar, Grants Consult-
ant. Discussion and possible action.
SYNQPSIS OF ACTIN,: Report by
Mitch Ceasar.
Mitch Ceasar, Grants Consultant, thanked C/M Bernstein for his
presentation concerning expansion of roads and traffic signaliza--
tion before the Broward County Expressway Authority at their last
meeting which was held at Tamarac City Hall. He said
approximately $160,000 has been received thus far towards the
design and planning study and they are moving forward on this.
He said they are hopeful DOT will do the study for the construc-
tion portion of University Dr. which should be approximately
2-1/2 million dollars.
Mr. Ceasar said he met with a member of the County Planning
office who is seeking to help the City get the additional money
for the planning stages. He said they hope to be successful in
having the DOT allot the money for paving towards the construc-
tion, which would be about 1/2 million dollars. He said he was
told by Richard Rubin, Consultant City Planner, that the Park
Grants are on hold for the moment because there are some other
park monies that have to be utilized first. He said he spoke to
Commissioner Thompson's office concerning the traffic lights at
the school, and the school will be providing flow -through traffic
in the parking lot.
19. Sister City Pr,Q-iect -- Status report regarding agreements
with Kiryat Tivon. Discussion and possible action.
N N• Status report
was given by Shirley Blumfield and
Jack Weiner and they were directed
to make arrangements for this trip
and report to Council by the next
meeting.
5
10/24/84
/pm
Jack Weiner, Commissioner for Sister City Kiryat Tivon, said at
the present.time, he and Co Commissioner, Shirley Blumfield,
have not accomplished anything. He said this was because of lack
of cooperation and they asked for help from Council concerning
this. He said with Council's assistance, they will have a report
for the next Council meeting.
V/M Stein MOVED that these Commissioners be directed to proceed
immediately to make arrangements for this trip and report to
Council on the details by the next meeting. Mayor Kravitz asked
the.City Attorney if this is City -sponsored or a private opera-
tion and Mr..Henning.said Council has stated their intention that
the City proceed with an agreement on the Sister --City Program.
He.said an agreement has not been worked.out that has been signed
by both sides, therefore,.this would be the first step. He said
the second step would be to have a signing,of the agreement and
Council is attempting to plan a signing ceremony in Israel.
Tape 2 Mr. Henning said he assumes the Council wants the Commissioners
to investigate the Mayor being there for the signing program and
establishing some arrangements where members of the community
could join. He said the question of how much this will cost the
City may be addressed at some future time and before any monies
are spent, this would have to be approved by Council.
Shirley Blumfield said the time of the.year for the trip affects
the price as well. V/M,Stein suggested the Commissioners contact
the Mayor and any members of Council who are planning on going
and determine a reasonable time. Mr. Weiner said he found the
best time to go to Israel is the spring, between May and June.
He suggested this would be the proper time.
C/M Bernstein SECONDED V/M Stein's MOTION.
C/M Munitz asked .who has the responsibility for drafting this
agreement and Mayor Kravitz said the City Attorney. Mr. Henning
said there have been some drafts on this and he will get further
comments from Council.
COMMUNITY DEVELUMENT
46. ConcorliVillage Z1 -- Discussion and possible action on:
a) Request by Shell Oil Company to extend approval of the
final site plan -T_em2. _Resa. 13343
b) Request by Dinerstein Company for approval of a Revised
Site Plan to reflect the following changes by Temp.
Peso. #3344:
1) Waiver of the 20--foot berm along NW 88 Avenue
2) From condominium to rental project
3) From Adult to Open Community with a maximum of 24
units.
4) Reducing three buildings from three stories to one
story on the south side of NW 61 Street
c) Assignment of the Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
a) APPROVED an extension for one
year from 6/17/84 .
b) APPROVED as amended.
c) APPROVED.
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-333 PASSED.
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-334 PASSED.
a) Mr. Henning read by title.
6
10/24/84
/pm
Richard Rubin, Consultant City Planner, said there are two
separate applications before Council; first, is a request to
extend the approval of the existing site plan. He said on the
Development Review Status Sheet, staff is recommending approving
the extension to the existing site plan with the following
conditions:
1. all prior agreements are still included in the Motion.
2. the applicant has requested Council grant a waiver to allow a
15-foot wide berm and a 3-foot wall on 88 Ave. in lieu of the
20-foot wide berm that is required by Code.
3. "Right Turn" signs are required on 88 Ave.
4. an easement for sidewalk is required on NW 84 Terr. prior to
issuing building permits.
5. all driveways should have 47-foot radius
6. dumpsters must comply with Code
7. a revised Landscape Plan must be submitted to the Beautifica-
tion Committee for approval.
C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of the extension of the site plan for
one year, SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
b) Mr. Henning read by title.
Mr. Rubin asked Council to correct the agenda, on Item 2) which
states that this is a request from a condominium to a rental
project. He said the condominium has been indicated to the City
verbally, however, there is nothing in the City files that
indicates that originally it was going to be a condominium
community.
Mr. Henning asked if the developers could give an explanation of
the revised site plan that was just extended. Mr. Rubin said the
original site plan showed that there would be five 3-story
buildings along the waterway with a clubhouse in the center and
four 3-story buildings on the north side of 61 St. facing the
golf course. He said the new site plan is almost identical in
the physical configuration of the buildings, there are still four
3-story buildings on the north side, on the south side there are
still five buildings with the clubhouse in the center. He said
the only physical change is that the three buildings on the north
side of the canal are now proposed to be 1-story in height
instead of the 3-story originally proposed. He said there are
changes in the parking and they have closed one median opening
proposed on 88 Ave.
Julian Bryan, representative of Shell Oil Co., as the present
owner of record of the property said one additional item not
covered is the clubhouse, which in the original plan, was a 2
story building; however, in the proposed amended plan will be
only 1-story. He said, therefore, the view from across the
canal, from south to north, will be of all 1-story buildings. He
said this will still meet the City's minimum Code requirement for
assembly area and, on the north side of 61 St., there will be
another facility with restrooms, swimming pool, etc. He said
they agreed, as part of the original agreement years ago, to
resurface 61 St. for the entire length of the project.
Mr. Bryan said the reason they are changing from 3-story to
1-story on a portion of the project is that they have chosen to
change the unit mix. He said in the original plan there was a
predominance of 2--bedroom units and the new plan has a predomin-
ance of 1-bedroom units which will address the lifestyle of
Tamarac.
7
10/24/84
/pm
Mr. Bryan said after exhaustive study with their legal and bond
counsel, it has been determined,that this can be developed as an
AdultCommunityrather than an open community and he will
represent this to.the City for the record. He said this will be
a rental development and "Form of Ownership" is not an issue for
the City Council or a Zoning Board to address. He said this is
an expensivepieceof real estate and cannot be an inexpensively
developed project. He said after.studying various condominium
communities within the City, most have rentals now and are being
rented for substantially lessthanthe rent structure of this
development with the average rent between $500 and $600.
C/M Stelzer asked Mr. Bryan to put the indication that,this will
be an Adult Community on the site plan and Mr. Bryan said he
would. V/M Stein asked Mr. Bryan if a -traffic study..shows that a
traffic light is required on 61 St. would they consent to install
one. Mr. Bryan said there has been some discussion about provid-
ing a northbound deceleration lane on 88 Ave.; however, the City
Engineering Department advised them that this is.a County permit
process. He said the Dinerstein Builders have agreed that if
that is appropriate, they will add a right"turn deceleration lane
for traffic safety. He said Mr. Dinerstein will answer the
question concerning the traffic light.
Irving Fuchs, President of Maintenance of Section 13, said the
Dinerstein Builders gave a- presentation..on this project to his
section and they are not in favor of this. Robert Bonafluri,
resident of'Section.13,-said he is.speaking for.most of the
residents of his section.in stating.their objections. He said
with homeownership there is pride in the community.which is
lacking in rental developments. He said another objection is the
traffic congestion that approximately 400 more.cars would cause
in this area. He said his final objection concerns information
he received from his bank that if the value of homes.in the area
is-reduced-becauseof the building of this project, this could
seriously affect the City's tax structure.
Mr. Henning told Mr. Bonafluri that the approvals that the.
developers have obtained over the last 4 years did not require
that this be a condominium development. Mr. Bonafluri said he
was told by Helen Sobel that it was approved as a condominium for
adults only.. Hy Hochman, resident of Sands Point, asked why they
are considering rental apartments when.there are many available
now. Mr. Bryan said the development will have sidewalks on both
sides of 61 St., 84 Terr. and 88 Ave. with a complete sidewalk
system internally as well. He said the price of a unit might be
approximately $26,000, but when the land, site improvements,
parking lots, builder's profit .and real estate commission are
added, this brings it up to the $60,000 to $70,000
range.
Tape 3 Jack Dinerstein of Dinerstein -Builders, said approximately 9
months ago, they met with the people that own this property,
Shell Oil Co., and noticed -there -were many problems -with the
development. He said after discussions they found.the first
major problem was the resistance -to the 3-story buildings that
face Section 13 and abut the canal. He said they redesigned this
site plan to include all 1-story buildings on that canal to give
the people the privacy they want. He said they met with the
Mayor and Council and were advised to meet with the neighborhood
people involved.
A
10/24/84
/pm
Jack Dinerstein said at that time, Bill Dinerstein, his father
and Chairman of the Board of Dinerstein Builders, Gary Campbell,
Executive Vice President and Project Manager and Claude Arnold,
Vice President of Construction, met with approximately 125
residents representing the neighborhoods surrounding this
proposed project.
Jack Dinerstein said as history of their company, it was founded
in 1955 by his father and uncle and they build in Florida, Texas,
New Mexico and Utah at this time. He said they have built
approximately 30,000 units and today manage between 11,000 and
12,000 units. He said during this meeting it was obvious that in
the minds of the neighbors, the change from the 3-story buildings
facing Section 13 to the 1-story buildings was a major plus. He
said it was also obvious that there were other problems and they
thought they had a solution by limiting the number of units with
2-bedrooms/2-baths to 24 units that could include children. He
said they were informed that this was not sufficient and they
must give guarantees which he said they were going to do by
stipulating on the site plan that there would be all one bedrooms
and one-bedroom/studies on the property. He said it is their
company policy that in a one -bedroom they do not allow children.
He said at this meeting they discussed professional management
and the list of amenities.
Jack Dinerstein said in answer to the question of what happens
when their company builds these units and leaves, they feel they
have solved that problem by bringing in a 50% equity partner that
will raise equity necessary to build a quality property and will
help sustain the property as the market fluctuates. He said this
equity partner is a 3-1/2 billion dollar financial institution
from Texas. He said they are in the position today to guarantee
the following:
1. the buildings facing Section 13 are 1-story.
2. on the site plan they will record this as "Adult Community".
3. they have a 50% equity partner to insure continuity of owner-
ship and proper funds to build and operate the units.
4. the professional leasing of the Dinerstein Management Co.
Bill Dinerstein said the consensus of the meeting they had with
the residents previously was that there were two basic objections
first, rentals and second, children. He said they cannot
overcome the rental situation but they did design this project
with conformity to the existing neighborhood in mind. He said
some of the things they will have in every unit are:
1. private or screened patios.
2. ceiling fans.
3. 25-ounce carpeting.
4. color coordinated wallpaper and kitchens.
5. recessed lighting
6. cable TV hookup
7. washer/dryer connections built in on some units.
8. laundry facilities available.
9. full electric kitchens including a disposal, frost -free
refrigerator with a freezer, stove and dishwasher.
10. there will be door--to-door garbage pickup.
11. manufactured marble -top vanities in the bathrooms.
12. miniblinds
13. metal entry doors.
14. smoke and heat detectors.
15. security locks on all doors and windows.
16. a complete security and fire alert system with an optional
medical alert system.
V/M Stein said the residents are not opposing the amenities, but
rather the fact that they are rental units.
9
10/24/84
/pm
V/M stein repeated his question as to whether the Dinerstein Co.
will pay for a traffic light if it is needed and Mr. Dinerstein
said they will and it was their suggestion at the last meeting.
Mr. Dinerstein said they have a three-part lease with the
procedure that a person sign a lease and application, put up a
deposit and: rent. He -said they will then go through several
checks and call and notify.the.people if they comply with the
rental requirements. He said they will have a Manager and
Assistant Manager on the premises 24--hours a day.
Robert Bonafluri, resident, said Mr. Dinerstein said the cost of
this project would be,20 million dollars including land and
construction. He said that averages out to $41,250 per unit and
not $60,000; therefore, they.are.sti l discussing $26,000 units
in an area of $60,000 to $90,000 homes. Blanche Barsley, resi--
dent, asked why the leases were only for 6 months.
Willard stei,nberg, resident, asked.if part.of this will be built
on a Federal subsidized loan and Mr. Dinerstein said no.
Morton student, resident, said he is against rental projects.
Burt Rosenfeld, resident, said he;does not trust any. developers.
C/M Munitz said there are reputable builders and a.statement of
mistrust of all builders is unfair. He said Dinerstein Builders
has a very good reputation and can be trusted.
Mr. Henning said for clarification of the record, when this site
plan -was up for extension, the developer was entitled to build 3-
story, 2-bedroom apartments, with a 5-foot berm and rent them.
He said the-builderwanted an open community with children and in
exchange for allowing children,.the developer was willing to give
a 20 foot berm instead of the 5-foot berm and they were willing
to have 1-story,buildings by the canal. He said the developer is
not requesting an open community and is withdrawing the request
for 2-bedroom apartments. He said they have always hadthe right
to have rental units and they are not giving up that right. He
said there have been discussions on traffic lights, recreation
fees and a water and sewer agreement.
Mr. Henning said he was told by Mr. Bryan, on behalf of the
developer, that they will agree with the City and bond $25,000
towardsa traffic light at 61 St. with the provision that the
County approves. He said that agreement will be backed up by a
Letter of Credit for 2 or 3 years if the County approves this.
He said this would not interfere with the right -turn deceleration
lane that was mentioned. -He said there has been some computation
of Recreation Fees and they find there was a $15,000 additional
amount needed which they have.agreed:to_pay before the first
building permit is pulled. He said -the Water and sewer
Agreements have been changed and instead of a 2-year take -down
with building permit, they have agreed to pay the. Contribution In
Aid of Construction charges of over $200,000 by the next Council
meeting.
Mr. Henning said concerning the Council agenda for this.item, #2
was withdrawn and #3 should be deleted. Mr. Henning asked
Mr. Dinerstein if they have.any intentions at this time to have
condominium documents and Mr. Dinerstein said no. Mr. Henning
asked if Dinerstein Builders intends:to be the owners and
managers or sell it to a management company. Mr. Dinerstein said
Dinerstein Builders will own 50% of the units and University
savings Association will own the other 50%. He said $37,500 has
already been paid by Shell Oil Co. for the park fees and
Dinerstein Builders has agreed to pay an additional $15,000.
10
10/24/84
/pm
Mr. Dinerstein said the minimum lease is one year and there will be
no subsidized rental at all. Mayor Kravitz said he told the
builders to go to the people and he will vote against this if the
people feel they are not in favor.of what is proposed.
V/M Stein MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #3344 as amended. He said
there is already an approved site plan for rental which was in
existence for four years and was just extended by Council for
one year. He said the people will be served better with this new
site plan as amended than the previous one submitted. He said he
would include in his MOTION the elimination of items #2 and #3 from
the Resolution in Section 1.
C/M Stelzer said Section 1 of the Resolution should have some
changes, noting that it will be an Adult Community, the building
reduction from 3-story to 1-story and the waiver of the 20-foot
berm along 88 Ave. instead they will install a 15-foot separation
with a 3-foot wall. C/M Stelzer SECONDED the MOTION with those
changes. Mr. Henning said Section 1 B of the Resolution should
have the following added:
"9. An agreement for a traffic light bonded up to $25,000.
10. Payment of an additional Recreation Fee of $15,000 before the
first building permit is pulled."
Mr. Henning said another item would be revision of the Water and
Sewer Agreement to updated form.
C/M Bernstein said he has listened to all discussions and he con-
curred with the residents' objections initially; however, he feels
this developer is doing everything possible to please the resi-
dents. He said subject to the City Attorney making certain that
the exact form in which this is done incorporates the proper safe-
guards, he is in favor of this. C/M Munitz concurred.
Tape 4 VOTE:
C/M Bernstein Aye
C/M Munitz Aye
C/M Stelzer Aye
V/M Stein Aye
Mayor Kravitz Nay
Mr. Henning said for the record that the berm he was referring to
is a 15-foot berm and not a 20-foot berm as reflected in the Reso-
lution.
c) Mr. Henning said the assignment of the Water and Sewer Developers
Agreement will be incorporated in the revised agreement and he
recommended approval and V/M Stein so MOVED. SECONDED by
C/M Munitz.
44. -- Status report by City
Planner concerning consideration by Broward County of two
proposed Land Use Plan Amendments. Discussion and possible
action.
Report by
the City Planner.
11
10/24/84
/pm
7_1
L
Richard Rubin said the Broward County Planning Council will rehear
this item on 12/6/84 and Council's attendance would be helpful. He
said this is on the agenda for direction from. Council if any addi-
tional reports, slide presentations, etc. are necessary. He said
Commissioner'Beach has stated°that she wants to discuss land uses
in the City.again and he suggested a cooperative effort between the
City and FP&L.
Tim Taylor, representative from FP&L, said Commissioner Beach has
made some accusations about the land use plan of Tamarac as opposed
to Coral.Springs. He said they.would like to coordinate the effort
and have Mr. Rubin discuss.,.the land use with the few.
recertifications and changes in Tamarac and FP&L will make the
presentation to the Planning Council on 12/6/84. Mr. Johnson asked
Mr. Taylor if, since Mr. -Rubin is on a Consulting fee,.with the
City, would FP&L:be willing to assume his fee. Mr. Taylor said
they could consider ,it; however, most: of the.time land use changes
and.recertifcations are-handled:by-the City Planner.. He.said he
does not feel that FP&L is appropriate to respond to the history of
the land uses of Tamarac.
Mr. Henning said there have been two requests for factual input,
first, that there is -a substation needed somewhere and, second, the
substation that is needed, must be placed in the vicinity that is
proposed. He suggested.FP&L have scientific and electrical experts
present at the meeting to discuss this with aerial photos showing
the locations of present substations and:the voids of substations.
Mr. Taylor said they will have all the experts present.
41. Tamar-ac Ufa_rk_et- _P1ace - Rgyi,aed $Jtg- Plan - Temp. Res-
#3360 - Discussion and possible action on a revised site
plan for Chicken Unlimited and for relocation of a ground
sign.
SYNOP IS.OF ACTION: APPROVED RESOLUTION: NO. .
with conditions.
Mr. Henning read Temp- Resa_.-#336Q.by title.
Mr. Rubin said staff recommends approval subject to.the items
listed on the Development Review Status Sheet, which are:
1. the site plan reflecting the relocation of the ground sign from
the northeast corner of the plaza to the central entrance drive.
2. handicap parking spaces to be in conformance with South Florida
Building: Code.
3. no call box (order station) permitted.
4. all, prior comments pertaining to this development still being
valid.
C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #3360 subject to the
conditions stipulated, SECONDED by V/M Stein.
37. Brookwood Plaza - - Temp. Reso.
#3357 - Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan
for a temporary drive.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
with conditions.
RESOLUTION NO. $ 84M329 „ASSED.
Mr. Henning read Temp. aggg, #3357 by title.
C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL.of Temp. Rego. #3357 subject to con-
ditions stated on the Development Review Status Sheet, which are:
1. the applicant agreeing to landscape the existing center in
accordance with today's standards at the time he constructs
the�.temporary drive.
2. before engineering can issue a permit for the roadway, the
applicant should provide a cost estimate.
12
10/24/84
/pm
r
3. in all areas within 10-feet of the paved roadway, there shall
be at least 13-1/2-feet of vertical clearance to allow for the
overhang of the aerial ladder to insure a clear turning radius
for Fire Department vehicles.
4. Fire Department recommends all landscaping to be.a minimum of 9
feet from the access road turning areas and a minimum of 6-
feet from hydrants.
5. tenant names and addresses.will be placed on all doors for
identification for Fire Department purposes.
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
43. Woo mont Tract 7.4/75 -- Discussion and possible action on:
a) Revision to Site Plan #5 reflecting revision to various
unit widths, addition of one unit and adjustment of parking
- T_emR-... Reso-. 43336_4
b) Amendment to Water and Sewer Developers Agreement.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
a) APPROVED.
b) APPROVED as amended, the applicant
is to give the City a break -down
by building on Exhibit D and there
will be some lines removed in
Paragraph I-H.
RESOLUTION NO. R-84--332 PASSED.
Mr. Henning read Tema. Reso.,#3364 by title.
b) C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL on amendment to the Water and Developers
Agreement, SECONDED by V/M Stein.
Mr. Henning said he recommends approval requesting the developer
submit a break -down by building on Exhibit D. He said there will
be a couple of lines in Paragraph 1-H that will be deleted.
a) C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of Temp,_._ Resos_ 33_64 as amended,
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
45. k1godmont Plaza - Temp. Reso. #3342 - Discussion and
possible action to amend a Special Exception.granted to Jack
Lalanne Health and Fitness Center regarding expansion of
facility.
DENIED -
Item reconsidered on Page 28.
Mr. Henning said the Resolution has not been prepared on this item
as yet since it is awaiting Council discussion. Mr. Rubin said he
prepared a memo this morning that satisfies staff in three differ-
ent ways that there will be parking provided for Jack Lalanne:
1. It temporarily provides that All Saints Lutheran Church's vacant
parking lot to the east of Jack Lalanne will be used for
parking. The applicant has agreed to put in 24 to 30 wheel
stops. The applicant has agreed to put lighting there.
The applicant has agreed to have directional signs posted on the
property to indicate that additional parking will be available
on that vacant lot.
2. If All Saints Lutheran Church should no longer permit this
temporary parking in their lot, there is a commitment from
Tamarac Shops that they will provide parking at their site and
Jack Lalanne has agreed to provide a shuttle service to and from
this parking area.
13
10/24/84
/pm
0
L�
3. When Alx.Saints Lutheran Church builds their new facility, they
will have more than enough parking available 6-1/2 days a week
for this overflow parking.
V/M Stein said he is not satisfied that these accommodations will
be sufficient and he opposes this. Mr. Rubin said there is parking
on the public rights -of -way; however, the City can police this by
posting signs on both sides of the right-of-way. He said although
the Pastor of All Saints Lutheran Church has not put their per-
mission in writing, they recognize that this could be allowed.
V/M Stein MOVED to DENY this petition, SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
C/M Stelzer read a letter dated 10/17/84 from All Saints Lutheran
Church to Barry Eden which stated that they cannot sign a long-term
rental agreement to use any portion of their property for parking
at this time since they are uncertain as to what the needs of their
parish will be. Mr. Henning said the problem is that with verbal
conversations with the Building Department, the petitioner has
begun breaking the walls in and they are trying to work with the
City.
38. Lake Colony/Brookwood Gardens - Revised Site Plan - Temp,
Reso. #3358 -- Discussion and possible action on a revised
site plan to amend the minimum rear setbacks.
QXNQESIS OF : APPROVED RESOLUTION NO.-84-330 PASSER.
subject to all previous conditions
still being applicable and installation
of streetlights in all cul-de-sacs as
shown on the site plan and agreed to by
the applicant's representative.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Rego. #3358 by title.
C/M Stelzer said staff recommends approval subject to installation
of streetlights in all cul-de-sacs as shown on the site plan.
Mark Taravella, representing Chrisdon Builders, said he would
initial the site plan accordingly. C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of
Temp. Reso. #3358, SECONDED by V/M Stein.
Mayor Kravitz recessed the meeting to 1:30 p.m. for lunch.
Mayor Kravitz called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. and all were
present.
22. City C-ouncil Chamberg - Discussion and possible action
concerning Resolution 84-314 which declared that the public
address system shall be in use for all meetings held in the
Chambers. - Temp..,Rea.Q,L-43365
SUMIS OF ION: TABLED
awaiting the City Attorney's draft
of a more meaningful Resolution.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Rego. #3365 by title.
14
10/24/84
/pm
r
C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of , SECONDED by
V/M Stein.
C/M Munitz asked how the City Manager will be able to enforce this
Resolution when it is approved and Mr. Henning said he tried to
determine the remedies available. He said the City Manager, by
Council's direction, can control staff regarding this.
C/M Munitz said the Charter Board is one of the few groups that
does not use the public address system and Mr. Rubin has agreed
that the Site Plan Review group will use the speakers in the
future. He said he has not addressed penalties at this time. V/M
Stein said the City Manager should be directed to implement this
Resolution and if the City Manager cannot do this without further
action by Council, he could bring this to Council's attention.
C/M Bernstein said Temp. Reso. #3317 stated that the Council
Chambers should be used for meetings whenever possible. He said if
Temp. Reso. #3365 is approved, any committee wishing to
circumvent both Resolutions, could use a different location for
their meeting. He said it is Council's intent to have these meet-
ings open to the public and broadcast over the public address
system and the City Attorney should structure this accordingly.
C/M Munitz said he does not feel Temp. Resg. #3365 accomplishes
what Council wants. C/M Stelzer WITHDREW his MOTION and requested
this item be TABLED until the City Attorney drafts a more meaning-
ful Resolution, SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
24. City Cauncil Liaison Rositions - Temp_._ Rego. 13341 -
Discussion and possible action to designate Council members to
serve in positions of liaison to City committees, special
projects and governmental entities outside the City.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
as amended.
RESOLUTION NO. - - 25 PASSED
Mr. Henning read TemA�Rego, 13341 by title.
V/M Stein MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #3341 inserting as
follows:
in Section 1, liaison positions for Mayor Kravitz are:
Veterans Affairs, Welcoming Committee, County, Beautification
Committee, Board of Adjustment and Consumer Affairs.
In Section 2, liaison positions for YJM.Stg!n are:
Planning and Community Development, Airport Board, Rules and
Appeals, Drainage, PIC, Grants and Chamber of Commerce.
In Section 3, liaison positions for C/M Stelzer, are:
School Board and Tamarac Elementary School, County liaison on
Agendas, Emergency Medical Service, Solid Waste, West Revital-
ization, Golf Feasibility and League of Cities.
In Section 4, liaison positions for C/M Munitz are:
Presidents Council, Parks and Recreation, Community Center, Budget
and Israel.
In Section 5, liaison positions for C/M Bernstein are:
Social Services, Yard Drainage, Sun Dial, Special Assignments,
Burglar Alarm and Investment Committee.
15
10/24/84
/pm
V/M Stein said these are liaison positions which have been request-
ed by each Council member. C/M Munitz SECONDED the MOTION.
Mayor Kravitz noted that at the League of Cities earlier this year,
he was appointed as. Representative and C/M Stelzer is the Alternate
member. V/M Stein amended his MOTION to remove the League of
Cities from C/M Stelzer's positions.
C/M Munitz, as the SECOND, accepted this change.
14. emergency: Medi-cal ermice . -rTemp. Rego. #3338 --
Discussion and possible action'to approve execution of a lease
with Medics Ambulance Service for non --exclusive use of Fire
Station #2.
RESOLUTION NO. R--84-323_PASSED
Tape 5 Mr. Henning read by title.
Mr. Henning,said earlier this year there was a change in the ambu--
lance'services based on -County service stations. He said the
company that was serving Tamarac was Community. Ambulance and now it
is Medics Ambulance and the.City has been operating under a Lease
renewable month--to-month with Medics Ambulance. He.said they have
been housing one of their ambulances at Fire Station #2, which is.
by the Turnpike entrance, to the mutual benefit of.the City and the
County.
Mr. Henning said the negotiated rent was $450 which is still in
effect and the lease provides for a 30--day cancellation notice and
is recommended by the Fire Chief and him.
V/M Stein MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso._#333_$, SECONDED by
C/M Munitz.
15. emergency Servi-ce-a - Discussion and -possible action to
authorize the City -Manager to investigate the feasibility of a
computerized system for medical emergencies, fires or
burglaries..
YNOPSIS OF ACTION: The City Manager
was authorized to investigate the
feasibility of a computerized system
for medical emergencies, fire or burglaries.
C/M Bernstein said this is a proposed service for all residents
wherein, by using a little black box with 4 buttons, they.can
automatically summon help for emergencies of medical nature, fire
or burglaries. He said.a similar system is currently successfully
in effect in the City.o£ Corvina, California. He said a similar
service is available on a rental basis of $10 per month from
Teletec in Miami for that area. He said based on investigation, it
is believed this service could be made available to.the people of
the City for under $100 "One Time Cost". He said the purpose of
this item on the agenda, is to direct the City Manager to investi-
gate, discover costs and to make his recommendations to Council.
V/M Stein said Concord Village II
development. C/M Bernstein MOVED
investigate this further, SECONDED
16
is installing this system in that
to authorize the City Manager to
by V/M Stein.
10/24/84
/pm
J
W
ft
C/M Stelzer said whenever the Burglar Alarm Ordinance is under
discussion, several residents complain that they must pay for
alarms that are hooked up to the Police Department. He said there
will have to be 3 fees involved, for fire, medical and burglaries.
Vickie Beech, resident, asked C/M Bernstein if this will go to bid
and who recommended this. Mayor Kravitz explained that it was only
a suggestion from C/M Bernstein for a report from the City Manager
on its feasibility.
16. Building_Depaltment - Discussion and possible action to
approve the City Manager's recommendation for the appointment
of a Chief Building Official (tabled from 10/10/84).
SYNOPSIS QF ACTION: APPROVED the
City Manager's recommendation for the
appointment of Robert Jahn as CBO with
a salary of $34,293.83, a 6--month pro-
bationary period and a normal car allowance.
City Manager Johnson said it is his recommendation that Robert Jahn
be appointed as Chief Building Official. C/M Stelzer MOVED.
APPROVAL of the City Manager's recommendation to appoint Robert
Jahn as CBO with a probationary period of 6 months, with a salary
of $34,293.83 and a normal car allowance, SECONDED by C/M Bernstein
Zip
17. S-u-rplus_ Law_ BQQks - Temp. Rego. #,3339 - Discussion and
possible action to approve the sale of American Jurisprudence
Practice and Pleadings, Second Edition..(This was changed to
American Jurisprudence Legal Forms, Second Edition).
ACTION:SYMPSIS QF APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. R--84-324 PASSED.
sale of American Jurisprudence Legal
Forms, Second Edition to Fraley, Heekin
& Davis in the amount of $405 plus
shipping costs.
Mr. Henning read Temp, Reso,#3339 by title.
C/M Stelzer said the City Attorney is recommending Council accept
the offer of $405.00 which is the only offer that was received C/M
Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL.of Temp. Reso. #3339, SECONDED by
C/M Munitz. Mr. Henning said he would like to indicate one typo-
graphical correction, the Resolution is correct and it refers to
American. Jurisprudence Legal Forms, Second Edition; however, the
agenda states a different set of books.
31. Sign Ordinance - Temp. Ord..#IIA3 -- Discussion and
possible action to amend Chapter 21 of the Code relating to
signs. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS QF ACTION: Public Hearing ORDINANCE NO. 0-84-58 E&SS_ED.
was held. APPROVED on second and
final reading, as revised on 10/19/84.
Mr. Henning read Temp._Qrd. #1143 by title.
17
10/24/84
/pm
L___1
Florence Bochenek, Chairperson of the Beautification Committee,
said this has been the work of several years with input from the
City Attorney and business people. Mr. Henning said they are
rewriting the Chapter in the Code regarding signs with emphasis on
the following areas:
1. Criteria - when there is a shopping center or any multi -tenant
building, the property owner tells the City the type of signs,
within certain dimensions and color, that they would like to
have for their tenants. He said when the tenants come in, they
are supposed to conform with the criteria set down by the
property owner. He said this system has some shortcomings;
therefore, they have made some changes:
a) the criteria is presented to the Beautification Committee
initially.
b) when this is submitted, it must contain upper case and lower
case alphabet.
c) the City is allowing three styles of lettering in a shop-
ping center as long as the size and color conform.
d) they have never had a provision to change the criteria, but
now there is a provision where the criteria may be
amended.
2. Vehicle Signs - there has been difficulty regulating these
since things that go on vehicles are governed by inter -state
commerce; however, if a vehicular sign is being used in lieu of
a stationary sign or is placed so that it cannot be safely used
on a road, then this can be regulated.
3. Code Enforcement -- Originally signs had a notice for a correc-
tion and the City allowed 60 working days to move a violation.
Now, temporary signs which are in violation must be removed
immediately if it is a permanent sign; they will be given 60
calendar days to correct the violation.
4. Gas Stations -- they are attempting to limit the number of signs
at gas stations and amendment to Section 21-6 F would encourage
gas station owners to have their price signs incorporated in the
ground signs. Mr. Henning said they are allowing the gas
stations to include that in the ground sign.
Mr. Henning referred to Page 32 of the Ordinance, Section 21--11,
which stated that non -conforming signs will have four years from
today to be removed. He said the date should be 10/24/88 rather
than 7/l/88.
C/M Munitz asked how this Ordinance can be enforced and Mr. Henning
said in the past the fines for this were a minimum of $50 and a
maximum of $200 per violation per day. He said they have raised
the fines to a maximum of $500 and this is enforceable through the
County Court system. C/M Stelzer referred to Page 17, under
"Special Signs", he suggested this state "Individual commercial
enterprises may qualify for special occasion sign, banner or
decoration permit such as but not _limited _to bona fide...".
C/M Stelzer asked who will be responsible for notification that
the non -conforming signs must be changed by 10/24/88 and
Mr. Henning said the someone in the City should give notice to
them.
Mayor Kravitz opened the public hearing. Florence Bochenek,
Chairperson of the Beautification Committee, said the system that
is being used now is that the Code Enforcement Officer first
advises them and that is followed by a letter from the CBO.
Melanie Reynolds, Charter Board member, said she had asked that
this have second reading when the business people and Chamber of
Commerce of the City could be present. C/M Stelzer said the
Council had a meeting with the West Broward/Fort Lauderdale Chamber
of Commerce on this.
18
10/24/84
/pm
j
F_. J
Hy Fox, resident, asked if the new Ordinance addressed the situa-
tion that occurs when a person parks a vehicle big enough to be
considered a billboard at a service station. Mr. Henning said if
the vehicle cannot be driven the way it is then it is a sign more
than a vehicle and if it is on property that does not belong to the
business being advertised, it would be a billboard. He said the
City does not address in the Sign Ordinance whether or not used
cars can be sold from a gas station. Shirley Blumfield, resident,
asked if the real estate "For Sale" signs are addressed concerning
their removal after the property is sold. Mr. Henning said real
estate signs are indicated but they do not stipulate when they must
be removed.
Bernie Simms, President of Bermuda Club, asked if this Ordinance
will address political signs and Mr. Henning said it has been
revised in this Ordinance.
C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Ord. #1143, as revised
10/19/84, on second and final reading, SECONDED by V/M Stein.
VOTE:
F"W"WiZe m
32. Bruce Egan - e - - Temp._Orsi.
1# 148 - Discussion and possible action to rezone lands at the
southeast corner of University Drive and NW 64 Street,
extending eastward to the western boundary of Vanguard Village
and southerly to St. Malachy Church property, from R-3 (Low
Density Multiple Dwelling) to B-2 (Planned Business) and S-1
(Open Space/Recreational). First Reading.
a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of Mail-
ing and Affidavit of Posting.
b) Consideration of application.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Public Hearing
was held.
a) ACCEPTED Affidavits of Publication,
Mailing and Posting.
b) Application was DENIED.
a) Mr. Henning read hemp. Ord. #1148 by title.
Mr. Henning said there is a court reporter.present and he asked
Council and the public's cooperation in making a concise and accu-
rate record. Mayor Kravitz asked the Assistant City Clerk if the
Affidavits of Publication, Mailing and Posting have been received
and she confirmed that they have. V/M Stein MOVED ACCEPTANCE of
the Affidavits of Publication, Mailing and Posting, SECONDED by
C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VQTEA AYE
b) Nathan Levinson, resident, asked why this is coming before Council
again when it was Denied at the last hearing. Mr. Henning said
this issue came up several weeks ago and the Petitioner asked that
this be Tabled for a future date for further preparations. He said
since there was an audience present, Council did not grant the
opportunity for a tabling and, at that point, the Petitioner de-
cided to withdraw his application and no action was taken by
Council. He said under the present City Code, the developer has
the opportunity to refile his petition, he has refiled, and this is
the second time this has been before Council.
19
10/24/84
/pm
Mr. Rubin said the Planning Commission heard this item and they did
recommend,Denying the rezoning request. Myles Tralins, representa-
tive of the petitioner,.,.Bruce Egan,.said they previously marked
someofthe documents referred.to today as Exhibits so that the
record is clear as to:what is.being referred to. He said Exhibit 1
was the original petition that was filed for rezoning and attached
to that;petition was a copy of the check for payment of the filing
fees plus three surveys and°sketches of surveys showing specifi-
cally what the petitioner was requesting. He said the petitioner
has requested that this parcel of land, consisting of 10.acres
located on.University Dr. at.the intersection of NW 64 St. and
running•.south from 64 St...for 871-feet, be rezoned to.provide for a
B-2 Neighborhood/Communitybusiness zoning on the front portion of
the parcel. He said that portion would consist of 8.060 acres and
would extend from University Dr. eastward approximately 450-feet.
He said behind that piece, the petitioner has requested that a
parcel of land running from that point back to the property line,.
consisting of 1 acre and approximately 50r-feet in depth by 871--feet
in width, be zoned S-1 (Recreational) area.
Mr. Tralins said this would provide an additional buffer area in
addition.to the natural barrier of pine trees that runs across the
back of this property. Mr. Tralins said their presentation today
consists of two parts, first,.an analysis of the property as it
presently exists in light of the.use on University Dr. and, second,
a history of°that property'..indicating that this parcel of land, in
fact, has been spot -zoned with the City, sits with a.,spot--zoning
designation of residential property on commercial land and is
unuseable in its present condition.
Mr. Tralins said the bulk of the presentation will be made by
Timothy L. Lunney, who is -with Craven & Thompson. Mr. Lunney's
educational background was the Palm Beach County Director.of
Planning and Zoning. Mr. Lunney said the rezoning requested.is
provided under the 5% provision of the flexibility zone in the
City's Comprehensive Plan. He said, in.addition, other required
services, as specified.by the Development.Review criteria are
available. He said as background,.Mr. Egan purchased this
property in 1968 and at that time it was already zoned
Commercial and would permit general business uses. Hesaid in
October, 1973, the City zoned this property to R-3 as part of a
large number of down zonings intended to prevent University Dr.
from developing as a commercial. corridor. He said since 1973,
the City has allowed University.Dr. to develop as a.commercial
corridor and, in fact,.Mr. Egan's'property is the only resi
dentially zoned lot on the --east side..of University Dr. for
approxi-mately a mile and a half north or south of this
property. He.said:they are requesting,that the City correct
this inequitable example..of spot --zoning in reverse and grant
Mr. Egan the same development rights that are enjoyed by the
owners of all other properties on the east side of University
Dr.
Mr. Lunney said they have researched extensively.the.planning
and zoning history.of this property and have prepared various
exhibits which show current land use and zoning. He referred
to the first Exhibit which is an aerial photograph of
University Dr. from the northern City limits down through the
southern limits of this City and the next.
20
10/24/84
/Pm
Tape 6 Mr. Lunney said the subject property is located on the bottom
side of University Dr. and is colored in green. He said they
superimposed actual zoning and land use information and this
photo reflects the existing and planned development for Univer-
sity Dr., orange indicates those areas zoned or developed for
business and commercial uses, red are those areas which are
presently developed or zoned for institutional uses and yellow
are those areas developed for residential purposes. He said they
have taken a series of photos which are of the locaton shown on
that exhibit by white dots and he submitted a booklet of photos
into the record. Mr. Tralins said they have previously marked
the booklet which consists of 23 photos as Composite Exhibit 5.
Mr. Henning asked if Mr. Tralins is expecting Council to reserve
any ruling on this or a ruling today and Mr. Tralins said no,
they are going to review the photos and the presentation.
Mr. Lunney said beginning at the south end of the University Dr.
corridor in Tamarac, the first photos and land use is an area
occupied by office buildings and shops.
Mr. Lunney said immediately south of University Dr. in the second
photo is St. Malachy's Church and the third photo south and west
of the site across University Dr. is a restaurant, an office
building and to the rear a large sewage treatment plant. Moving
onto the site and looking on the east property line there is a
large stand of Australian Pine trees which dense undergrowth. In
photo 5, looking directly east there is the rear subdivision of
homes called Vanguard Village which was platted in 1970 while Mr.
Egan's property was still zoned commercial. He said looking
across to the north there is a vacant commercial tract and in
photo 6 there is the rear of a shopping center which is located
on the north side of 64 St. He said further to the west there
are store fronts that face 64 St. and Mr. Egan's property and in
photo 9, there is a view of the shopping center from the corner
of 64 St. and University Dr.
Mr. Lunney said immediately west of Mr. Egan's property is
University Dr. which is currently carrying over 34,000 vehicle
trips per day on 4 lanes. He said this road is planned ultimate-
ly to be expanded to 10 lanes including double frontage roads.
Mr. Henning asked for explanation of the 10 lane plan and Mr.
Lunney said they are planning 6 lanes with double frontage roads
on either side and a 200--foot right-of-way. Mr. Lunney said the
County is requesting an additional 47-feet from Mr. Egan's
property. Mr. Lunney said across University Dr. to the west is
the Concord Village development which is part of a larger commun-
ity which fronts on a golf course. He said moving north on the
east side of University Dr. north of the shopping center on 64
St. is a large vacant tract and moving further north in photos 11
and 12 there are office developments, shopping center and in
picture 13, at the intersection of McNab Rd. and University Dr.,
a gasoline station. He said diagonally across this inter-
section, in photo 14, there is California Federal Bank, moving
further north on east side is another gas station and further to
north a shopping center, photos 16 and 18. In the same general
area on the west side of University Dr., photo 17, there is a
hospital complex which includes large office buildings and north
of this is an elementary school and associated park.
Mr. Lunney said moving north of the school, photo 20, there is
another shopping center which is located on a piece of property
which was rezoned to residential in 1973 and is now zoned commer-
cial. In photo 21, north toward the City limit, there is another
area zoned residential at the same time and there are now shop
ping centers, office buildings, gasoline stations and a consider-
able amount of new commercial construction.
21
10/24/84
/pm
6
Mayor Kravitz advised,Mr. Tralinp that they have one minute
remaining for their presentation and Mr. Tralins said he feels
his client has a right to make a record. Mr. Lunney said
University Dr. has been planned as the major north/south
trafficway for the western part of�the County and a strip of land
varying from 300 to 600°-feet was created along both sidesas the
property was parceled off for residentialAevelopment.behind
these frontages. He said, at that time, it was common practice
to reserve all of the frontages on major thoroughfares for
commercial., industrial, utility and institutional development.
He said as these residential developments were platted, the
shallow depth and configuration of'.the frontage properties were
fixed and isolated from•the residential developments by the
design of those.subdivisions.and by the installation of tree
lines and buffers. He said'in 1972 and 73, the City, as part of
its comprehensive planning.and zoning effort, attempted to
prevent University Dr. from developing as this commercial
corridor.
Mr. Lunney said in theory, multi-family.development would occur
on some of.these frontage.properties with buffer,to resi dential
developments to the east and west and would somehow assume that
this residential development could be buffered.from the high
traffic noise along University -Dr. and.would have enough
amenities to attract residents He said in the case of Concord
Village, located across University Dr. this assumption is valid,
to the.west.there is a golf -course and that piece of property was
laid out with a larger community in mind.
Mr. Lunney said the City allowed 3-story development in this case
which makes it possible to stack the units against the golf
course and to put the service and utility areas of the buildings
facing University -Dr. which does provide some.measure,of noise
insulation. He said, however, because most of the properties
along University Dr. are very shallow -in depth and they.adjoin
rear yards of developed areas, because of high traffic volumes
and the attended noise levels, an& because.of zoning restrictions
limiting,height and requiring large setbacks, by 1977 the City
had reversed -itself and redesignated most of these shallow lots
from residential back to commercial He said, in fact, the only
properties which were not changed back to commercial.were.Concord
Village, which had,al.ready been platted, and the 16-acre tract at
the southwest corner of 82 St. and University Dr..which, like
Concord Village, also abuts a golf course and a lake. The third
and last piece of residential.on University Dr. is the 10-acre
Egan..property which abuts neither a golf course nor,water but
instead,a commercial development to the north, a large church to
the south and a rear yard of an existing development to the east.
Mr. Lunney said although the City reversed itself regarding all
shallow development similar to.Mr. Egan's property by 1977, it
has continued to apply a different standard to Mr. Egan's pro-
perty imposing and maintaining residential zoning. The final
exhibit, he said, was the'City's zoning map which clearly shows
the difference between the east and west sides of Univerity Dr.
He said the green areas on this exhibit are golf courses and
parks; however, on the east side the frontages are much shallower
and abut already developed residential projects. He said con-
sidering that the County is,asking for an additional 47-feet on
Mr. Egan's property,.the depth will be reduced..to only 455--feet,
extensive buffering would be required on both the north and west
sides to buffer the noises and would probably be required on the
east side, lack of amenities to this site, it is not possible to
create a viable residential community on this small.tract of
land.
10/24/84
/pm
J
Mr. Tralins asked Mr. Lunney if he was formerly Director of
Planning and Zoning for Palm Beach County from 1981 to 1984 and
Mr. Lunney said yes. Mr. Tralins asked Mr. Lunney if, prior to
that, he was the City Planner for Bangor, Maine and prior to that
he worked for the Greater Portland, Maine Council of Governments
in Environmental Planning and prior to that he studied Planning
and Architecture and Mr. Lunney said this was true. Mr. Tralins
asked what an A.I.C.P. was and Mr. Lunney said that is a designa-
tion meaning that you are a member of the American Institute of
Certified Planners and he is a Charter member. Mr. Lunney said
he is also a member of the American Planning Association, Palm
Beach County Planning Congress, and Association of Planners.
Mr. Tralins asked that this qualification statement be marked as
Exhibit 3. Mr. Tralins asked Mr. Lunney if, based on his exper-
ience as a Planner, he has an opinion as to what the proper
zoning designation would be on this property.
Mr. Lunney said it is obviously commercial in view of the fact
that this is the only residential piece left on the east side of
University Dr. and because of the limitations on the site, it is
not feasible to develop as residential.
Mr. Lunney said looking at the City's zoning Code, the B-2 cate-
gory comes closest to defining this particular location.
Mr. Tralins asked Mr. Lunney if he had any comment as far as the
designation of the rear 50--feet or one acre of the property as
S-1, and Mr. Lunney said the 50--foot S-1 area would provide a
sufficient area for a buffer to supplement the existing stand of
Australian pine trees and dense vegetation currently located on
the east side of this property. Mr. Tralins asked Mr. Lunney if
he has examined the site and Mr. Lunney said he had. Mr. Tralins
asked Mr. Lunney if, in his opinion as a professional planner,
the S-1 designation that Mr. Egan is asked to provide voluntarily
is necessary in order to properly zone this property B-2.
Mr. Lunney said it would not be required to justify B-2 but is an
offer on the part of the property owner to be a good neighbor.
Mr. Tralins asked what length of University. Dr. is shown on the
Exhibit and Mr. Lunney said that is over 3 miles, over a mile and
a half north and south of the subject property. Mr. Tralins
asked Mr. Lunney if he has an opinion as to whether or not the
subject site of Mr. Egan's property is spot -zoned when looked at
in view of all the surrounding properties previously described
and Mr. Lunney said it is spot --zoning in reverse. Mr. Tralins
said for the record, Exhibit 7, is the letter he sent to
Mr. Henning with respect to the previous appearance. He said
Exhibit B consists of two of the plats that were filed in
Vanguard Village, immediately adjacent to this property. He said
Vanguard Village property was platted for residential development
in May, 1970 and again in December, 1970 and at the time these
properties were platted residential, Mr. Egan's property was
zoned C-1 commercial. Mr. Lunney said that is correct.
Mr. Tralins said as a result of the reverse spot -zoning that has
occurred to this parcel, its inability to be developed as a
parcel of land on a major thoroughfare designed ultimately for 10
lanes of traffic with 34,000 vehicles passing per day, they
respectfully request that this property be rezoned to B--2 and S-1
as is indicated on the petitioner's Exhibit 1.
23
10/24/84
/pm
L�J
C/M Bernstein.asked if 47-Meet is going to be condemned for
widening of University Dr. and Mr. Lunney said that is correct.
C/M Bernstein asked if Council were to grant the rezoning that is
being requested would that increase the value of the property at
thee:time,of the condemnation? Mr, Lunneysaid no, it would have
to.be conveyed free�in order for the property to be platted
through Broward County. 'Mr. Tralins asked Mr. Lunney whether or
not a-viable:residenti;l use coul& be put to this property and
Mr. Lunney said in view of the small size and restrictions it
would not be possible.
Mr. Henning asked Mr.-Lunney if he is a licensed Planner in
Florida and Mr. Lunney said Florida.has no licensing for.
Planners.. Mr. Henning asked Mr. Lunney if he was an.architect
and Mr. Lunney said no. Mr. Henning said, however, it is Mr.
Lunney's opinion that there is no viable use for residential
development on this parcel of land. 'Mr. Lunney said -he -said it
is not feasible to create a viable residential community on this
site. Mr. Henning asked Mr. Lunney if he knows if the Concord
Village.property was involved in the rezoning thatoccurred in
the early 70's and Mr. Lunney said it was at one time zoned
commercial and rezoned to residential.
Mr. Henning asked if Mr. Lunney knows how many buildings there
are in Concord Village and Mr. Lunney said not exactly. Mr.
Henning asked how many buildings are indicated on photo 10 and
Mr. Lunney said that photo shows one building. Mr. Henning said
photo,.5 is the site of the rear of Mr. Egan's site and Mr. Lunney
said that is correct. 7Mr..Henning.sai Mr. Egan.is.proposing as
partofthe rezoning that theyl.would dedicate 50-foot buffer
zones for 5--1 non-commercial use. Mr. Lunney said that is
correct.. Mr. Henning said if this property were developed as
residential they would not be required to -dedicate that extra 50
feet. Mr. Lunney said..as part of site plan review, they would
probably be required to.provide some sort of buffer.
Mr. Tralins said for the purpose of the rezoning, Mr. Egan is not
required to provide it at all. He said their position is that
under the laws of the State of Florida the property.is improperly
zoned. Mr. Henning asked if,ether 44 St. or Oakland Park Blvd.
are shown on the aerial photo and Mr. Lunney said only 44 St. is
indicated. Mr. Henning said the Casty limits of Tamarac are at
Commercial Blvd. and Mr. Lunney said they are aware of that.
Mr.. Henning said Mr. Lunney is suggesting that there is a County
plan for 10 lanes of traffic on University Dr. and Mr. Lunney
said there will be 6 lanes for travel and 2 frontage roads.
Mr. Henning asked if Mr. Lunney knows of any properties on the
east.side of University,Dr. that have the frontage roads
installed.yet and Mr. Lunney said they have not been installed on
either side. Mr. Henning asked Mr. Lunney what his fee is for
the testimony he is giving today and Mr. Tralins said he objects
and other than the fact that they have retained Craven &
Thompson, they are paying a normal fee for Mr. Lunney's.
appearance. Mr. Henning said in order -to have,a.complete record,
the City is entitled to know the fee for Mr. Lunney's:services.
Mr. Lunney said the standard professional fee is $50 per hour.
Mr. Tralins said with respect to Concord Village, which is the
one residential piece, he asked Mr. Lunney to'explain again how
that site differs from Mr. Egan's property across the street.
Mr. Lunney said to the west of Concord Village -is a golf course
and -most of the units,in Concord Village have a view of the golf
course. Mr. Tralins asked Mr. Lunneyif there is anything else
with respect to the ability to construct those units.
24
10/24/84
/pm
'A
L
Mr. Lunney said because it does front a golf course, the setback
requirements are reduced for the residential buildings and they
are 3--story buildings which is not possible under the current R 3
zoning on Mr. Egan's property.
Mayor Kravitz opened the public hearing. Bernie Hart, President
of the Presidents Council, said the Tamarac Presidents Council
has gone on record as opposing any rezoning of residential
property to commercial. Saul Mesinger, liaison from the Planning
Commission, said the prevailing thought of rezoning today in
Florida states that there must be a real criteria for rezoning
property downward. He said that criteria is always the public
need for additional commercial facilities.
Ben Chicofsky, representative of Concord Village, said they are
against the extra traffic that will be created and there are
enough stores in the area already. Louis Reiss, resident of
Vanguard Village, asked Council not to allow strip stores in this
area. Father O'Connor, Associate Pastor of St. Malachy's Church,
read a letter from Monsignor Donnelly objecting to the rezoning
of this property.
Morris Glicksman, resident, said up to 1973 this City was
controlled by the original developer who arbitrarily zoned most
of the area C-1 for personal benefit. He said when the residents
realized this, they elected a Council that was citizen -oriented
and they stopped this practice. He urged Council to keep the
plan as it is.
Tape 7 Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing. C/M Stelzer said the
Ordinance is in a positive nature, therefore, he must MOVE to
APPROVE the Ordinance. The MOTION DIED for lack of a SECOND.
V/M Stein MOVED to DENY T&Mp. Ord. 41148, SECONDED by
C/M Bernstein.
,
33. ppnald T. Sutte --Petition- - Temp,
QYdi #1149 - Discussion and possible action to rezone lands
on the north side of Commercial Boulevard and east of the
southern terminus of the "S curve" of NW 57 Street, ex-
tending northward to the Fountain Apartments, from R-3 .(Low
Density Multiple Dwelling) to B-5 (Limited Business
District). First Reading.
a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication, Affidavit of
Mailing and Affidavit of Posting.
b) Consideration of application.
hUN-1l!,SIS OF ACTIQN: Public Hearing
was held.
a) ACCEPTED Affidavits of Publication,
Mailing and Posting.
b) APPROVED on first reading.
a) Mr. Henning read Temp. Ord.,41149 by title.
Mayor Kravitz asked the Assistant City Clerk if the Affidavits
were received and she confirmed same. V/M Stein MOVED ACCEPTANCE
of the Affidavits of Publication, Mailing and Posting, SECONDED
by C/M Bernstein.
W41401W6
25
10/24/84
/pm
b) Mr. Rubin said this application is to rezone the land for 2--story
office.purposes. He said after consideration, the Planning
Commission recommended approval with stipulations that the only
type of use that can be.placed,on the property would be offices.
He said they received today a copy of the proposed Covenant and
if Council approves.this, staff requests a legal.descrption and
sketch of survey and copy of.the existing B--5 Ordinance be
attached to the Covenant and made Exhibit thereto.
Mayor Kravitz opened the public hearing. Bernie Simms, President
of BermudaCl.ub, said they worked with the developer to make sure
all necessaryrestrictions were put in. He said.he.would like to
see a site,.plan and landscape plan.,on this. C/M Bernstein asked
Mr. Henning if it is legal'to put restrictions into the Council
approval,and Mr. Henning said it is legal because it is being
volunteered by the petitioner.
Barry Eden, resident, said assuming that property.was developed
for office use, would there be a left turn lane heading east on
Commercial Blvd. and is there a possibility of alight at that
intersection? 'Mr. Rubin said the access to go eastbound from
this property will be reviewed at the time the site plan comes
in. He said the architect would like to have access to the
median opening for an eastbound turn lane but this will have to
be worked out.
Mr. Rubin said the City is trying to get a traffic light at
Woodlands Blvd. and this is a higher priority at this time.
Morris Kozen, member of the Bermuda Club Board,of Directors, said
if this were rezoned commercial, every area next to it will put
in a similar petition. Mayor Kravitz closed the public hearing.
V/M Stein said the Covenant has restrictions and runs with the
land and the only thing that can be.there are offices.
C/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of.Tem9. Or ._,.t1j_4g on first reading
and said the petitioner has put in writing that there shall be no
ingress or egress from NW 57 St. The MOTION was SECONDED by
C/M Munitz.
13. - Discussion and,possible
action regarding a request from the State Department.of
Health and Rehabilitative,Services for the City to partici-
pate in a funded.program to fluoridate the drinking water
(tabled from 10/10/84).
SYNOPSIS Of ACTIQNt Authorized.the
City Manager, City Engineer and City
Attorney to return to Council with a
report concerning a request from the
State Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative.
Services for the City to participate in
a funded program to fluoridate the
drinking water.
Thomas K. Mueller, Assistant Director of Environmental Engineer-
ing of the Broward County Health Department, said the history of
fluoridation in Broward County -.started in March, 1972 with the
primary ballot when the electorate voted 2-1 in favor of
fluoridation. He said the County Commission at that time accept-
ed this as a mandate, therefore, they enacted Ordinance 72-17
which mandated fluoridation of all community supplies in the
County. He said there weresome communities at that time,
including Tamarac, that decided not to implement fluoridation.
26
10/24/84
/pm
Mr. Mueller said since that time, 25 water plants in the County
have implemented fluoridation. He said they estimate that
currently they have 77% of the population of the County receiving
fluoridated water and presently only 6 communities in the County,
including Tamarac, do not fluoridate.
Mr. Mueller said there is a small amount of natural fluoride in
the drinking water as it comes out of the ground which approxi-
mates about .1 to .3 millograms per liter. He said they are
seeking to adjust that level to a concentration between .7 to 1.0
millograms per liter. He said fluoridation concentration in
drinking water is routinely monitored at the water plant. He
said this is handled by certified operators and the Broward
County Public Health unit inspects these plants, reviews the
records and requests any improvements that need to be made. He
said there have been no significant problems encountered with
fluoridation in the 10 years it has been used.
Dr. Richard Ames, Dental Director of the Broward County Public
Health Dept., said the experience in the County among those young
individuals in those areas that have implemented the fluorida-
tion, has been a marked decrease in the incidence of cavities.
Dr. Ames said the importance of fluoridaton has been tested many
times since its original inception in 1945 in Illinois and from a
cost-effective point of view, fluoridation is the least expensive
and most effective method of providing this protection for young
people. He said although dental caries is a disease entity that
is predominant among young people, it will affect everyone.
Dr. Ames said in Florida there is a State Fluoridation Grant that
does assist communities that are interested in fluoridation of
their water supply. He introduced Dr. Harry Davis, represenative
from the Dental Program Office in Tallahassee, who is the
Granting Agency for this. Dr. Davis said basically, the Grant
covers any reasonable cost to implement fluoridation; namely,
cost of fluoridation equipment, installation costs, reasonable
consultant engineering fees, the fluoride chemical costs for the
first 2 years, fluoride testing equipment and safety equipment.
He said any employees of the City that are installers or
operators are not covered through the Grant and any purchase of
land for the construction of buildings is not covered.
Mr. Henning asked if this is 100% funding or matching funds and
Dr. Davis said he is basically talking about 100% funding if the
amounts are reasonable and they fall within these categories. He
said if there is something they do not cover, the City would have
to match that. He said the criteria -for financial assistance is
always subject to availability of funds. He said the Author-
ization to Fluoridate, can be either a Motion, a Resolution or an
Ordinance, the City must prepare a Cost Estimate for submittal to
them and they can give a prior approval for the Cost Estimate.
He said when the Cost Estimate is submitted, if there are items
they cannot approve, they are willing to negotiate for an agree-
ment. He said after the Cost Estimate has been approved, they
need a Letter of Agreement from the City officials to accept the
amount of funding that was agreed upon and the City must obtain a
Construction Permit from the Department of Environmental Regula-
tions. He said once the fluoridation has been implemented, the
City must be in compliance with the Florida Administrative Code
on drinking waters. He said they also require that the monitor-
ing reports that are sent to DER be copied to them as well so
that they can monitor the system also.
27
10/24/84
/pm
W
W
Dr. Davis said they do not attach many requirements to the
funding since they are interested in trying to get communities
fluoridated; however, there are certain guidelines they must
follow because there is Federal funding.
Mayor Kravitz said that since this is only a report,.the Council
should instruct the City Manager to investigate this,further and
return to Council with a report. C/M Munitz said since there are
some legal and funding questions involved he MOVED to TABLE this
item.for consideration -and input of the City Attorney and City
Manager with a complete report. V/M Stein SECONDED the MOTION
adding that he would like the Utilities-Director/City Engineer to
give input to this report as well. C/M Munitz accepted this
amendment to his MOTION.
VOTE: ALL VOTED
Mr. Henning asked who the City's contact.would be in Tallahassee
and Dr. Davis said Susan Allen is the Coordinator.of the
Fluoridation Project but if it is sent to him it will be forward-
ed to her.
COMMUNITY_DEVELOPMENT
45. Tem2, Reso. #3312 - Discussion and
possible action to amend a Special Exception granted to Jack
Lalanne�Health and Fitness Center regarding expansion of
facility.
SY_NOPSIs OF ACTI: (See Page 13)
Item reconsidered and APPROVED as amended.
The City Attorney will prepare the appropriate
Resolution for the 11/14/84 meeting.
V/M Stein MOVED to RECONSIDER Item 45 since Council has received
more information, SECONDED by C/M Stelzer.
V/M Stein said Council has received a letter which acknowledges
that if Jack Lalanne does not have a permanent solution or Cross --
Parking Agreement with All Saints Lutheran Church within 18
months, they will vacate the premises and close the opening.
He said the Planner has advised approval and he MOVED APPROVAL of
Tema, R so. #3342, SECONDED by C/M Stelzer.
C/M Bernstein said he would like to MOVE to TABLE this item
pending further input from staff; however, there was no SECOND to
this MOTION. Mr. Henning said Council agreed to reconsider this
matter and he assumed action would be taken to move forward
today. V/M Stein said with staff'sorecommedation, he is
satisfied that if there is not.an agreement for permanent
parking, Jack Lalanne will vacate this property and close those
openings. Mr. Henning said for clarification, the question is
whether,or not to -extend the Special Exception in light, of the
Cross -Parking Agreement. He said if Council
approves this, he will prepare the appropriate Resolution for the
next meeting; however, they can move forward today.
28
10/24/84
/pm
V/M Stein said for the record, his MOTION is to include all
recommendations made this morning.
VOTE:
C/M Bernstein Nab
Cli'° Paunitz Aye
C/M Stelzer Aye
tr/M Stein Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FI
12. Utilities West -- Discussion and possible action on:
a) Biofilter Construction - Request by E & A Environmental
Consultants, Inc., for payment under contract.
b) Approval to obtain bids for installation of a lime sludge
retaining wall in order to obtain additional storage
capacity.
c) Authorization for a secondary contract with Lynn Ro Con-
struction, Inc., to clean the lime sludge holding pits on
an emergency basis.
d) Sewage Treatment Plant Effluent Disposal Alternatives:
1) Presentation by James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineer
and adoption of their report.
2) Payment to James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers for
services rendered for the period of 7/31/84 to 8/25/84
in the amount of $3,280.00.
e) Professional negotiations with consulting engineering
firms concerning wastewater disposal.
SYNOPSIS Off- ACTIQ :
a) Authorized payment not to exceed
$10,000.
b) Authorized the Utility Director
to obtain bids.
c) Authorized the Utility Director
to enter into a seconary contract
with Lynn Ro Construction, Inc. to
clean the lime sludge holding pits
on an emergency basis, not to exceed
$7,500.
d) 1) ADOPTED the report of James M.
Montgomery Consulting Engineers.
2) APPROVED payment to James M.
Montgomery Consulting Engineers
for services rendered for the
period of 7/31/84 to 8/25/84 in
the amount of $3,280.00.
e) ADOPTED the ranking of staff and
authorized staff to negotiate and
return to Council with recommendations.
a) Alan Ruf, Consultant City Attorney, asked Bill Greenwood, Utility
Director/City Engineer if the Biofilter is working properly and
Mr. Greenwood nodded yes. Mr. Ruf said he wrote a letter in
August indicating that if the filter is finished, the City would
be in a position to make certain payments to them and he is
asking that the payments be authorized.
C/M Stelzer MOVED that the City make the payment, SECONDED by
V/M Stein.
C/M Bernstein asked Mr. Ruf, in reference to his letter of
8/16/84, paragraph 2 which states "With respect to Issues 1
through 5 set forth on the second page of your letter dated
8/l/84, the City will increase the compensation due you under the
terms of your contract by a total amount of $4,000.00".
29
10/24/84
/pm
J
C/M Bernstein continued reference to Mr. Ruf's letter of 8/16/84,
paragraph 2, which states "This sum reflects the City's
responsibility for inadequate inspection of the concrete work".
C/M Bernstein asked Mr. Ruf to explain this further.
Tape 8 Mr. Ruf said.the purchase of the biofilter was done on an emer-
gency basis in early spring of this year, there was no formal
bidding proceeding and the contract was made up of a group of
letters between the City Engineer and the construction company.
He said in one of the letters, the.City acknowledged that it
would provide inspection services which the City feels should be
limited to concrete work and the vendors position is that the
inspections should beyextended to all work on the project. He
said by the time it came down to finishing this project, the City
had changed City.Engineers':and there was some question as to
whether or not the City would be responsible for. more than
$4,000.
C/M Bernstein asked if the City was responsible for inadequate
i.nspection'of the concrete work and Mr. Ruf said he would rather
not give an opinion.on that at this time. C/M Munitz asked the
amount,to be paid.and Mr. Ruf said it is for the balance of the
contract, approximately $9,000.
C/M Munitz asked if the maker of the MOTION would accept the
amendment stating "not to exceed $10,000" and. C/M Stelzer
accepted this amendment.
C/M Bernstein Nay
C/M Munitz Aye
C/M Stelzer Aye
V/M Stein Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
b) Bill Greenwood, Utilities Director, said this is for the water
treatment plant facility and a retaining wall is required to
separate the water treatment facility property from adjoining
property. He said in the past lime sludge has been removed from
a sludge lagoon and this has created problems.
V/M Stein MOVED to AUTHORIZE the Utilities Director/City Engineer
to obtain bids for the installation of the lime sludge retaining
wall. SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE*.
c) V/M Stein MOVED to AUTHORIZE the Utilities Director/City Engineer
to enter into a contract with Lynn Ro Construction, Inc. to clean
the lime sludge holding pits on an emergency basis, not to exceed
$7,500. SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE:
d) Bill Greenwood, Utilities Director, introduced the representative
1) from James M. Montgomery who performed the study for the City.
&) Glen Humphries, Vice President of Montgomery Engineers.
2) Mr. Humphries said they looked at 3 alternatives in evaluating
the City's effluent disposal problem: spray irrigation, County
Regional system and the deep well option. He said there are
Grant applications already submitted by the City and they will
discuss the best way to go from here.
30
10/24/84
/pm
Mr. Humphries said the Spray Irrigation Capital Costs and one
alternative would require 77 days of storage to allow no
discharge at all into inland waters with a cost of 23 million
dollars. He said if there were only 15 days storage it would be
approximately 13 million dollars and if there were a spray
irrigation system where the stand-by condition was a deep well,
it would be approximately 11.77 million dollars.
Mr. Humphries said they also reviewed deep well capital costs and
these are lower, for 3 day storage capability in Land Section 7
as the backup to the deep well, this would cost 9.6 million
dollars. He said the next alternative which is lower in cost but
may not be permanent, would be a deep well to which the City
would be allowed, on an emergency basis, to discharge into an
inland lake. He said the next alternative is 8.77 million
dollars is an alternative where the backup to the City's deep
well would be a tie-in to the City of Sunrise to utilize a
portion of their system as Tamarac's backup. He said this poses
a problem in getting political problems solved and they would
hope that it might be discussed. He said the equivalent annual
cost comparisons: in order to meet EPA regulations and receive
Grants, the City must compare these things on an equivalent
basis. He said there are certain procedures that must be
followed, salvage value, debt service cost, etc. He said the
cost of going to the County is close to their recommendation for
Tamarac.
Mr. Humphries said the cost comparison for building a deep well
with or without a Grant would be: the cost for construction of
the deep well, 5.22 million dollars, with about a 10% Contingency
factor and a design factor which includes the design and
inspection of the deep well of about 15%, giving about a 6.5
million dollar capital cost.
Mr. Humphries said if the City were able to get a Grant, it would
be in the 1-1/2 million dollar range. He said there will be some
interest during construction and the City will get back money
that it put into escrow to the County as part of the Large User
Agreement. He said there are some bond issuance costs involved
and without a Grant there would be approximately a 7 million
dollar project and with a Grant it would be approximately 5.3
million dollars.
Mr. Humphries said the City's initial Grant proposal had spray
irrigation as the method of disposal and they are recommending
the City revise the Grant application to a deep well disposal
system and select a firm to design the deep well facilities
relatively quickly because the City may still be eligible for
Grant monies in this cycle of Grant applicatons. He said the
City must also meet with the County to revise the Large User
Agreement and settle the amount of monies to be held in escrow
and the reserve capacity.
C/M Bernstein said from the viewpoint of conservation of the
water resources in the State, he would tend toward spray irriga-
tion as opposed to deep well. He said he does not see an
estimate of the Capital Cost if the City uses spray irrigation
but, instead of using the City's deep well, the City should tie
into the deep well that is already in existence in Sunrise. He
asked if that alternative has been pursued. Mr. Humphries said
in the case with the spray irrigation, the deep well would not be
an emergency situation. He questioned whether Tamarac would want
to get involved with a mutual agreement with Sunrise.
31
10/24/84
/pm
1
C/M Bernstein said in an effort to get spray irrigation down to a
point where it was cost effective,,he questioned whether any
investigation along these lines had been conducted by Montgomery.
Mr. Humphries said now in fact, this was not an alternative that
they were requested to=address. He said this would, however, be
appropriate on an emergency basis. C/M Bernstein said he feels
that in the event there was a way to get spray irrigation in a
cost effective manner, he feels it should be investigated.
V/M Stein MOVED to adopt James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers
report and pay them the sum of $3,280.00, SECONDED by
C/M Stelzer.
C/M Munitz said he is uncomfortable with the statements "may be
Grant eligible" and Mr. Humphries said they represent several
cities in Broward County and over the years they have obtained
Grants but he would never promise one.
VOTE:
e) City Manager Johnson said they have a report Council received at
the last meeting regarding two phases. First, if the City
remained with the spray irrigation and second, if the City went
with deep-well'and.it was recommended the,City consider CHM2Hill.
Mr. Henning said.the City had a screening committee that ranked
the firms=..and Council should adopt the ranking ,of the screening
committee; however, the Council must still negotiate with the
number one choice which was mentioned by the City Manager.
V/M Stein MOVED that Council adopt the ranking of the staff and
authorize them to start negotiations and return to Council with
recommendations. SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
Lim4 4 Uoul. 0 ".4... i_
42. - Presentation by the developer
concerning proposed'Land Use P1an'Revisions and development
plans for three parcels in the golf course. Discussion and
possible action.
: TABLED for
a Workshop Meeting to be held on
11/2/84.
Richard Rubin said the City received a request by the owner of
the Sabal Palm Golf Course to discuss a proposal regarding
developing three parcels of land on the golf course and in return
for said development, there was discussion of thepossibility of
dedicating the golf course to the City. He said staff advised
the owner of the golf course that there was not enough informa-
tion to make a judgment for Council. He said they brought in
their preliminary proposal and staff felt before they could
initiate further review, they would like Councils direction.
He suggested the applicant be allowed to make a presentation to
Council.
Mayor Kravitz announced that all other items on today"s agenda
will be held for a Reconvened Meeting except for the two public
hearings at 5:05 p.m.
32
10/24/84
/pm
i
C/M Munitz said since this concerns the possibility of a City
golf course, he MOVED to TABLE this matter for the Golf
Feasibility Committee. SECONDED by C/M Bernstein.
VOTE
C/M Bernstein Aye
C/M Munitz Aye
C/M Stelzer Nay
V/M Stein Aye
Mayor Kravitz Nay
C/M Stelzer said this presentation was to show the people the
layout of the buildings that Mr. Stackhouse intends to put on the
golf course. He said there is no discussion now as to whether
the City would take the golf course as a donation or not. He
said the public is entitled to know exactly what is going to be
built. Ray Uterman, resident, said they propose to build a
10-story hotel and 5-story apartments and this is what the
residents object to, not whether or not the City should accept a
donated golf course.
Mr. Ellner, resident, directed Council's attention to Section
12.07 of the Charter, "Land zoned for recreational uses may not
be rezoned for other purposes until such zoning change has been
submitted to the qualified electors within the City by referendum
held for the purpose of approving such zoning change. Referen-
dums held pursuant to this Section shall be held at any general
or special election". Mr. Henning said the District Court of
Appeal of Florida has struck that down last decade.
C/M Munitz said it is obvious that his intention has been mis-
understood and he MOVED to RECONSIDER this item, SECONDED by
C/M Bernstein.
Mr. Henning said it should be understood that there is no peti-
tion before Council today, this is merely a general concept that
could be pursued by staff and Council but there will be no final
action taken today.
Richard Stackhouse, owner of the Sabal Palm Country Club, said
7/l/70 he bought a lease on the Sabal Palm Golf Course with a
purchase option which was exercised in 1977. He said the lease
required that there be a golf course on the premises for a period
of not less than 20 years. He said when he bought the property,
it was all zoned C-1 commercial and in 1972, the Council rezoned
it S-1 and in 1974, he petitioned the Broward County Circuit
Court to rezone only that portion of the golf course that
encompasses what is known as the driving range where the
clubhouse is. He said in 1977 the Circuit Court ruled that the
Tamarac Council had made a mistake and gave him R--4A zoning on
that property. He said that decision was appealed by the City
and the Appellate Court in Palm Beach County sustained the
appeal. He said currently the land is zoned R-4A which allows 3
story condominiums. He said they can build on that property,
assuming they meet the City's requirements, anytime they chose.
He said what is at issue is the opportunity to provide a fine
hotel and office building on other parts of the golf course that
will be assets to the City as a tax base.
Mr. Stackhouse said the proposed hotel would be of excellent
quality and the apartments would be rental. He introduced George
Janke, Vice President of the Oxford Corp., which is a New York
Stock Exchange Company.
33
10/24/84
/pm
r
Mr. Stackhouse said they are the third largest builder of rental
apartments in the world and they own and operate 40,000
apartments around the country. He said there are about 8,000
rental retirement homes and they market to the upper 25% of the
market segment. He said they have no units that are directed
towards the lower end of the social/economic group. He said they
have plans to develop on the corner of Rock Island Rd. and
Commercial Blvd. He said there would only be 3-story apartments
not 5-story as previously reported.
Tape 9 Mr. Janke said the reason they are considering a 7-story hotel is
because they feel the site lends itself to a high -quality type
hotel. He said they are considering building a small office
building at the corner of Rock island Rd. and Commercial Blvd.
and they are considering turning over the golf course debt --free
to the City. He said the golf course would generate
approximately $250,000 per year to the general fund and he
introduced their architect, Mr. George Mouriz of Mouriz &
Salazar.
Irma Fitz, resident, asked Mr. Stackhouse if any homes will be
affected by this and Mr. Stackhouse said all the homes will have
a view of the golf course. Rick'Wohlfarth, representative of
Oxford Corp., said they are considering the Sabal Palm Golf
community of 134--acres and they are.proposing to take 17-acres on
the corner of Commercial Blvd. and Rock Island Rd. and develop
375 multi -family high -quality 2 and 3-story buildings. He said
they are also proposing a 7-story hotel building not to exceed
250 rooms with locker room facilities and golf cart storage
replacing the existing clubhouse of Sabal Palm. He said the third
phase of the development will be not to exceed 5400 square feet
of office building on Commercial Blvd. He said the multifamily
parcel will have access from Commercial Blvd. and Rock Island Rd.
and parking will be clustered within the building. He said the
office building will also have access off Commercial Blvd.
Mr. Wohlfarth said the office building will be 4-stories in
height and the hotel will start at 1-story and becomes 7-stories
in the center.
Mr. Wohlfarth said the total impact of the building will be seen
in different heights. Barry Curtin, attorney for the Oxford
Corp., suggested the public meet with them on Thursday, 11/l/84
at 7:30 p.m. in order to have a more detailed presentation with
comments from the public. C/M Munitz said the purpose of his
original Motion was that there would not be the opportunity for a
fair presentation today. Mayor Kravitz suggested that at the
first convenient time,,he will call a Workshop Meeting for this
item allowing public participation.
V/M Stein MOVED to TABLE this item for a Workshop Meeting,
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AXE
35. Mobil Oil Com Anv - &.uthmmt ggragr pf Commergial
Boglevard and State Road 7 - Discussion and possible .action
on:
a) Request for permanent platting waiver -- Temp.-_ResQ. 3345
b) Revised Site Plan for ground sign - =p-,_ Rego._ #3331
(tabled from 10/10/84).
SYNOPSIS OF, TION:
a) APPROVED as amended.
b) APPROVED.
34
RESOLUTION NO. R-84--326 PASSER,
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-327_ PISSED.
10/24/84
/pm
L J
a) Mr. Henning read Temp, Reso.345 by title.
Richard Rubin said Mobil Oil Co. has purchased
at the southwest corner of Commercial Blvd. an
they need a sign to indicate who they are and
Council approve the waiver of the sign and not
He said they request the Resolution be amended
is a waiver to allow them to build a sign. He
has informed them that they will submit a new
rebuild the station and at that time, Council
waiver of platting.
the Sunoco Station
d 441. He said
staff is requesting
of the property.
to state that this
said the applicant
site plan to
can consider the
Mr. Henning said on the present Resolution, Section 2 should
read, "the exception of permit is hereby granted to Mobil Oil Co.
in lieu of satisfaction of the platting requirements for a sign
to be placed on the property located at...". Mr. Rubin said the
title should read " for a sign on the property...".
V/M Stein MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reeo._#3345, SECONDED by
C/M Munitz.
YOTE : _Y=D_M
b) Mr. Henning read Temp_ Reno. #3.0 by title.
Mr. Rubin said this item has been reviewed by the Beautificaton
Committee and staff recommends approval of the site plan for the
sign only. V/M Stein MOVED APPROVAL of
SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
_VOTE:
36. ny -- TortJeast corner of CornmeX
o a at a - Discussion and possible action
on:
a) Site Plan -- Temp.
b) Water Retention Agreement
(tabled from 10/10/84)
RESOLUTION NO. , -8S. 4--3228 P_ASaED•
a) APPROVED with conditions.
b) APPROVED.
a) Mr. Henning read Temps_ Reso. #J3n by title.
Mr. Rubin said a variance was granted by the Board of Adjustment,
the site plan was approved by the Planning Commission and staff
has requested that Council's approval should be subject to the
driveway in the southwest corner being moved north to alleviate
the traffic congestion at the corner; the driveway could be moved
northward 10-feet and the northwest driveway could be moved
approximately 5-feet further north. V/M Stein so MOVED, SECONDED
by C/M Munitz.
ME: ALL VOT E
b) Mr. Henning said the Water Retention Agreement has been submitted
and their representative submitted a check in the amount of
$910.00 for the Drainage Retention Fee to the Assistant City
Clerk at the meeting. Mr. Henning said he would recommend
approval of the agreement which has been executed by the develop-
er. V/M Stein so MOVED, SECONED by C/M Munitz.
=E : ALL VOTED - AXE
35
10/24/84-
/pm
�I
A
57. o_ Q sm .. n:,..1 d--.Section 7 - -r
Discussion and possible action to:continue a moratorium on
deveopments designated as industrial on the Land use Plan in
Land Section 7. Second Reading.
• Public Hearing
was held. APPROVED•T=V. Ord,,,,-. 11+40
on second and final reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 0-81-59 PASSED.
Mr. Henning read TAMP. Ord., ,#1140 by title.
Mr. Henning said the expiration date of the moratorium is
4/10/85.. Mayor Kravitz opened and closed the public hearing with
no response.
V/M Stein MOVED APPROVAL of on second and final
reading, SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE:
C/M Bernstein Abstained on the
grounds of a possible conflict
C/M Munitz Aye
C/M Stelzer Aye
V/M Stein Aye
Mayor Kravitz Aye
58. SpeciAl Zxcevtion.Pr!2vj3,j.Qns- --
Discussion and possible action to create Section 28-86.1 of
the Code to permit a special exception for four (4) story
structures in R--4A zoning districts. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS- F._ C�N: Public Hearing ORDINANCE NO. 0--84-60 PASSED.
was held. APPROVED.
on second and final reading.
Mr. Henning read TpMp. Ord.- 1133 by title.
Mayor Kravitz opened and closed the public hearing with no
response.
V/M Stein MOVED APPROVAL of .on second and final
reading, SECONDED by C/M Stelzer.
C/M Bernstein asked if the City approves a 4--story structure with
a height limitation of 40-feet, what would the ceiling height be
within the building? Bob Daurity, contractor for Lakes of
Carriage Hills, said inside the apartments the height in all
living area would be 8-feet, in the bathrooms and hallway it
would be 7--feet, which is according to the South Florida Building
Code. C/M Bernstein asked if this is uniform with..other projects
in Tamarac and Mr. Daurity said they have built other building
in Lakes of Carriage Hills and they are all this way.
C/M Munitz asked if this would be creating a precedent in the
City and Mr. Henning said the reason this Ordinance is before
Council, is because one particular developer had a problem;
however, this Ordinance is not specifically tailored for one
development. He said this is an Ordinance that other develop-
ments could comply with by Special Exception with Council's
review.
36
10/24/84
/pm
61
'A
Mr. Henning said the developer has done everything possible to
make this an acceptabe plan and there is one area on Page 3,
Paragraph K, which states " in addition to the drainage require-
ments set forth in the Code" and in Section 24--28.1 of the Code,
which states, "5% acreage shall be developed as open lakes". He
said they are requesting double drainage. V/M Stein said he
would prefer to leave this restriction in the Ordinance.
C/M Bernstein asked Mr. Henning if the Council passes this
Ordinance, would that mean that any future development would have
to conform to "L" in the Ordinance? Mr. Rubin said if the
developer should want to build 4-stories, it would require
Council approval of a Special Exception and they would have to
reduce the density by 10%.
Mayor Kravitz recessed the meeting to a Reconvened Meeting on
10/30/84 at 9:00 a.m.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
This public document was promulgated at a cost of $261.40 or
$7.27 per copy to inform the general public and public officers
and employees about recent opinions and considerations by the
Council of the City of Tamarac.
CITY OF TAMAMC
APPROVED AT AIEETW OF4,
City Clerk
37
10/24/84
/pm
ATTACAMFNr,' #1 ( item #`57 )
. ---------- _
FORM 4 MEMORANDUM OF VOTINk.. CONFLICT
BTsRN.�TESN, ALI,AN C. AG❑STATEtutot: ��/� �_ _.�....---------...---....___._
AST NAME - FIRST NAME -MIDDLE NAME DATE O ICH VOTE. OCCURRED
` °'y -
AILING ADDRESS NAME OF PER ON'RECORDING MINUTES -
5901 BREADFRUIT CI:i:CI,F' ❑COUNTY �! ft-..Ly_1� r-��T d'1���
I rY ZIP COUNTY TITLE OF VERSON RECORDING 14IN11TES
P1IMARAC 3331.E I3F?OT'dAI2[) ;QMUNICIPALITY
,ME OF AGENCY ._..•__
SPECIFY
CCITY OF TAMARAC ❑OTHER
1NIORANDUM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A VOTING SITUATION (Required by Florida Statutes §112,3143 (1,979) j
you Have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional interest which inures to
ur special private gain or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained, please disclose the nature of your interest
Clow.
Description of the matter upon which you voted in your official capacity: T,. I `; `F f. J. CI i : !) 1't (';' i l; f; C: i' (. S I F',L;.]
CONFLICT OP INTr:R?CS'I'.
Council Meeting OCTOBER 24, 1984 ITEM 57, MORATORIUM LAND SECTION 7
Description of the personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your special private gain or
the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained:
5iY WIFE AND I LACII OWN A '1.5`1, In11'l:I: EST 0II 7� PARC:1'11. 01' U?1:I ll'1-, ;`J;';1-) I, ,"Jl) IN
TILE CITY OF SUNF',IST,;. THIS LAND IS ON TIII; J;A":;"' ;" I.FW OP '1O71 11 (1'1� 1 07d),
A1301.IT 1/2 MTLE SOt.I`-TH OF COMI'12R.CIAI, ROUI,I',`JAI'.D-
Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure:
a.0 Yourself b.❑ Principal by whom you are
(NAME)
DATE ON -WHICH FORM 4 WAS FILED WITH
THE PERSON
RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING MINUTES OF THE MEETING AT
WHICH THE VOTE OCCURRED:
=ILING INSTRUCTIONS
Phis memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
esponsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be
led merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from voting when a conflict j
interest arises; if you vote, however, the conflict must be disclosed pursuant to the requirements described above.
i
it jTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1979). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES
ROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE
)R EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO 'EXCEED 95,000.
pRM 4 - REV. 12-79
- 38- rim
10/7_4/84