HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-12-27 - City Commission Regular Meeting Minutes� MBA
u n,
OR%
P.O. BOX 25010
TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33320
FIRST CLASS MAIL
CITY OF TAMARAC
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
THURSDAY. DECEMBER 27, 1984
CALL TO ORDER: 9:30 A.M.
ANNOUNCEMENTS OF TIME ALLOCATIONS - MOTIONS TO TABLE - The Chair
at this time will announce those items which have been given a
specific time to be heard, and will entertain motions from
Council members to table those items which require research.
Council may agendize by majority consent matters of an urgent
nature which have come to Council's attention after publication.
PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
1. Employee Service Awards - Presentation by City Manager Johnso 1 27 8 pg 2
of five-year pins to Stephen A. Wood, Finance Director, and 5 yr pins pre -
Richard Ruhl, Utilities West Department. sented
2. Blood Donors Month - Presentation by Mayor Kravitz of a pro- 12/27/84 pg 2
clamation designating the month of January, 1985, as Proclamation
"National Volunteer Blood Donor Month". presented
3. Presentation by Mayor David Kaminsky, City of Lauderhill,
regarding NW -6-4 Ave. (this item is scheduled tb -be- heard at
approximately 10:00 A.M.)
4. Presentation by Mayor A."Becky" Gerren, City of Parkland
(this item is scheduled to be heard at approximately
10:15 A.M.)
5. Sister City Project - Presentation by various travel agents
regarding package tour arrangements for the Sister City tour.
Discussion and possible action.
COMMITTEES
6. Burglar Alarm Review Committee - Announcement of one vacancy
on this committee.
If anyone is interested in serving on the above committee,
please contact the City Clerk's office for an application.
CONSENT AGENDA
12/27/84 pg 4,5
TABLED until
engineering
studv COMDleted
12/27/84 pg 5
Temp.Reso #3455
agendized by
consent & APPRON
1 pg 6,7
Travel agent
selected
12/27/84 pg 10,
Vacancy
announced
7. Items listed under Item #7, Consent Agenda, are viewed to be
12/27/84 pg 10,
routine and the recommendation will be enacted by one motion
pg 11,12
in the form listed below. If discussion is desired, then the
item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be
a) through j)
considered separately.
and 1) APPROVED
k) REMOVED for
a) Alan F. Ruf - Consulting City Attorney - 12/19/84 -
discussion and
$2,655.00 - Approval recommended by City Attorney.
then APPROVED
b) -Williams , Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Consulting Engineer -
Project 2080-0, Statement 2 - 9/19/84 - $434.00 -
Approval recommended by City Manager and City Attorney.
I.A
PAGE TWO
c) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Consulting Engineer -
Project 2080-0, Statement 4 - 11/5/84 - $86.50 - Approval
recommended by City Manager.
d) Muller, Mintz, Kornreich, Caldwell, Casey, Crosland &:
Bramnick, P.A. - Labor Counsel - 12/6/84 - $78.00 - Approval
recommended by City Attorney.
e) Shailer, Purdy & Jolly - Counsel for contraband forfeitures -
Services for November, 1984 - $309.24 - Approval recommended
by City Attorney.
f) Billing, Cochran & Heath, P.A. - Counsel for Saito vs. City
of Tamarac - 12/14/84 - $146.25 - Approval recommended by
City Attorney.
g) Authorization to waive bidding procedures and procure certai
communications equipment for the Police Department from
Mobile Communications in the amount of $2,500.00, with funds
to come from Account 001-218-521-644, in order to retain a
frequency assigned by the Federal Communications Commission
in January, 1984.
h) Authorization for the City Manager to sign a permit applica-
tion with the State Department of Transportation for certain
beautification improvements to Florida Turnpike Exit 20.
i) Authorization to Purchasing Agent to dispose of surplus
equipment that was offered for sale, but not sold, at the
City auction on December 15, 1984.
j) Authorization to procure, under State Contract, a Ford Sedan
and a Ford Pick-up Truck for Public Works in the amount of
$14,468.01 using Federal Revenue Sharing Funds allocated in
the 1984/85 Federal Revenue Sharing Budget.
k) Authorization to those City Council members desiring to
participate to attend the Florida League of Cities Prelegis-
lative Meeting in Tallahassee in February, 1985.
1) City of Tamarac Vacation of Right -of -Way for a portion of
NW 67 Street - Petition #2-V-84 - Approval to extend the
tabling action to a future Council meeting.
GENERAL
ADMINTSTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
8.
Bid Award - Public Works Department - Discussion and possible
2/27/84 pg 12
action on:
) APPROVED
a) Awarding of a bid for aquatic plant control - Temp_. Reso.
) APPROVED
#3439
b) Awarding of a bid for landscaping at the Florida Turnpike
Exit 20 - Temp. Reso. #3440
2/27/84 pg 12
9.
Tamarac Police Department - Discussion and possible action on
recommendations by the City Manager regarding police services
contract with Broward Sheriff's office (tabled from 11/14/84).
g 13. City
gr. was direct
a4 to discon-
iin.ue nego,tiat:
10.
Mitchell Ceasar - Discussion and possible action on an agree-
ment regarding fees for Mr. Ceasar's continuing work on the
University Drive Widening project (this item is scheduled to
be heard approximately 9:45 A.M.)
"rith BSO
L2727 4 pg 2,
3,4.Contract
Lo be prepared
City Atty.
2/27/84 pg 13
11. Broward League of Cities Business - Discussion and possible
action.
o further infc
M
PAGE
THREE
UTILITIES WEST
Pg 9
APPROVED
12.
Ladder Safety Devices - Temp. Reso. #3454 - Discussion and_quote
possible action to procure these devices.
12/27/84 pgl9.
13.
Bid Award - Temp. Reso. #3441 - Discussion and possible
APPROVED
action to award a bid for back flow devices.
4.
Utility Rate Analysis - James M. Montgomery Consulting
12/27/84 pg 7
Engineers - Discussion and possible action on:
pg 8.a)ACCEPT]
a) Acceptance of Phase I Report
b) & c)
b) Approval of payment for Phase I Report
APPROVED
c) Authorization for the appropriate City officials to begin
negotiations for Phase II and Phase III
12/27/84 pg20
15.
Sludge Dewatering and Composting - Discussion and possible
pg 21'City,
action to award a contract for engineering services.
Mgr.authorize
to enter,into
16.
Treatment Plant - Discussion and possible action to
Contract.
_Sewage
authorize an engineering feasibility study on relocation of
12/27/84 pg 15
the Sewage Treatment Plant.
16. APPROV]
17.
Operations Building - Discussion and possible action on a
12/27/84 pg21
temporary facility.
City Mgr, auth
rized to go
LEGAL
AFFAIRS
o bid
18.
Waste Mana ement, Inc. - Tem Reso. #3443 - Discussion and
12/27/84 pg2l,
�
possible action to approve an Addendum to the contract for
22 .
pg pg 22.
residential and condominium solid waste collection and
ED
disposal.
19.
Council Salaries - Temp. Ord. #1153 - Discussion and
2/27/84 pg 22
_City
possible action on a proposed amendment to Charter Section
"PROVED -first
4.04 regarding Council salaries. First Reading (tabled from
eadin
12/12/84)
20.
City Council Expenses - Temp. Ord. #1154 - Discussion and
2/27/84 pg 22,
possible action on a proposed amendment to Charter Section
pg 23. REMOVED
4.04 establishing guidelines for Council expenses by ord-
rom agenda
inance. First Reading. (tabled from 12/12/84)
21.
Lease Purchase Agreements - Temp_ Ord. #1164 - Discussion
2/27/84 pg 24
and possible action on a -proposed amendment to Charter
"PROVED -first
Section 7.13 to exclude these agreements from requiring
eading.Second
reading on
voter approval. First Reading. (tabled from 12/12/84)
/16/85
22.
Redistricting - Temp. Ord. #1165 - Discussion and possible
7 pg 24
- _ -_
action to amend Section 2.10 of the Code to remove the
pg 25.APPROVEDfirst
requirement that the report by the Redistricting Committee
reading.
Second reading
re5
re
be adopted by the City Council by ordinance. First Reading.
n
23.
Burglar Alarms - Temp. Ord. #1166 - Discussion and possible
12/27/84 pg13,
action to regulate burglar alarm users and burglar alarm
14,15JABLED
devices under Chapter 14 of the Code. First Reading.
24.
FP&L Phoenix Substation - Discussion and possible action on•12/27/84
on:
12/27/84pg 1,
a) Authorization for the appropriate City officials to
Agend-
accept an assignment of Deed Restrictions on this pro-
ized by Cons'en
perty from Leadership Housing, Inc. - Temp. Reso. #3329
TABLED for
b) Authorization for the appropriate City officials to
further review
execute a Release of Deed Restrictions placed on this
property by Leadership Housing, Inc. - Temp. Reso. #3330
(tabled from 10/10/84)
25.
Fire Services - Temp._Reso. #3442 - Discussion and possible
12/27/84 pg25
action objecting to any plans of Broward County to take
APPROVED
over municipal fire services.
PAGE FOUR
26. Oasis Lounge at 3 Lakes_ Plaza - Discussion and possible
action on a request to provide for the extension of the
hours of operation beyond 2:00 A.M.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
27. Kings Point Recreation Complex - Discussion and possible
action on:
a) Revised site plan for a pedestrian walkway, sod in lieu",
of asphalt between tennis courts and a flagpole - Temp.
Reso. #3424
IN
TABLED
12/27/84 pg 17
a) APPROVED
with condition;
b)APPROVED
b) Landscape Plan
(tabled from 12/12/84)
28.
Ashmont Revised Site Plan Temp. Reso. #3451 - Discussion
12/27/84 pg 17
and possible action on a revised site plan to reflect as-
APPROVED
built setbacks and a fence around the lift station.
29.
University Texaco - Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso. #3452 -
12/27/84 pg 17,
Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan for a
pg 18,19.
catch basin and a trench drain.
TABLED for
agreement
30.
Tom Norris Restaurant - Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso.
12/27/84 pg 19
#3453 - Discussion and possible action on a revised site
pg 311., TABLED
plan to reflect addition of a water heater room.
then reconsid-
ered and APP-
31.
Tract 44 (northwest corner of McNab Road and NW 88 Avenue) -
ROVED with
Discussion and possible action on:
condition
a) Presentation by applicant of proposed new development at
7 pg 73,
this location.
pg 24. a)
b) Waiver of the platting requirements of Chapter 20 of the
Council deemed
Code for an administrative trailer and sign for temporary
new devel. un-
use -- Temp. Reso. #3444.
necessary. b)
-APPROVED
with
32.
Woodmont Tract 59 - Warranty Bond - Temp. Reso. #3445 - Dis-conditions
cussion and possible action regarding disposition of a
12/27784 pg 25
warranty bond posted for public improvements.
APPROVED call-
ing if repairs
33.
Woodmont Tract 48 (Waterford at Woodmont) - Discussion and
not completed
possible action on:
or bond extends
1777 Pg
a) Waiver of the provisions of the sign ordinance governing
APPROVED for
signs on property other than the applicant's - TemL.
a)
Reso. #3450
1 yr. APPROVED
b) Renewal of a model sales permit and waiver of the 300-
b) to expire
foot distance requirement for certificates of occupancy.
7/25/85
34.
University Community Hospital - Discussion and possible
12/27/84 pg 25
action on:
pg 26.APPROVED
a) Release of a performance bond posted for completion of
on -site work - Temp. Reso. #3446
b) Release of a performance bond posted for completion of
on -site beautification - Temp. Reso. #3447.
35.
Colony West Country_Club - Performance Bond - Temp. Reso.
12/27/84 pg 26
#3448 - Discussion and possible action to call a perform-
APPROVED calliz
ance bond posted for public improvements.
if bond not
received
36.
Swanson West - Performance Bond - Tem Reso. #3449 - Dis-
12/27/84 pg 26
cussion and possible action to call a performance bond
APPROVED callii
posted for public improvements.
I if not extende(
REPORTS
37. City Council 12/27/84 27
38. City Manager 12/27/84 27
39. City Attorney 12/27/84 27
J
V .__:1
W
PUBLIC HEARINGS - 5:05 P.M.
PAGE FIVE
40. Zoning Re ulations - Temp. Ord. #1142 - Discussion and pos-
sible action to amend Chapter 28 of the Code to provide for
municipal governmental uses in addition to institutional
and educational uses in an I--1 district. Second Reading.
41. City of Tamarac - Rezoning Petition #30-Z-84 - Temp. Ord.
#1161 - Discussion and possible action to rezone the City -
owned lands on the west side of NW 88 Avenue at NW 75 Street
(also known as Tract 38-A) from S-1 (Open Space/Recreational)
to T-1 (Institutional/Educational). Second Reading.
a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of
Posting.
b) Consideration of application.
12/27/84 pg 28
APPROVED -
second reading
12/27/84 pg 28
APPROVED -
second reading
a) ACCEPTED.
42. Administrative Reduction to Setbacks - Temp. Ord. #1125 - 12/27/84 pg 29
Discussion and possible action to create Code Section pg 30. APPROVE
28-194.1 to permit administrative reductions to setbacks, second reading
establish procedures for application, processing of rulings as amended
and appeals. Second Reading.
City Council may consider such other business as may come before
it.
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person
decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with
respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he
may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is
made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is based.
CITY OF TAMARAC
J_
Carol E. Barbuto
Assistant City Clerk
Following are the residential and commercial zoning districts in the City:
R-1
- Single Family Residence
B-2 -
Planned Community Business
B-3 -
General Business
R-lB &
R-lC
- One -Family Dwelling
B-5 -
Limited Business District
R-2
- Two -Family Dwelling
B-6 -
S-1 -
Business District
Open Space/Recreational
RD-7
- Two -Family Dwelling
I-1 -
Institutional
R-3U
R-3
-Raw House
- Low Density Multiple Dwelling
M-1
- Light Industrial
Industrial
RM-5
- Residential Multi -Family
M-2
A-1
- Medium
- Limited Agricultural
RM-10
Dwelling
- Planned Apartment
A-5
T-1
- Agricultural/Excavation
- Trailer Park District
R-4A
- Planned Apartment
R-5
- Motel/Hotel
B-1
- Neighborhood Business
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
43. Ratification or FOP Contract - Discussion and possible
action. Agendized by Consent)
44
PAGE SIX
Temp. Ord. #1167 - Discussion and possible action on a pro-
posed Charter amendment from the Charter Board proposing
the creation of Section 5.06 of the City Charter prohibiting
elected and appointed officials of the City from interfering
with the activities of the City Administration. First Readin
(Agendized by consent)
1G/L//Z51+ pg 1,
pg 26.
PROVED to
xpa.re 9/30/86
z//_//Z54 pg z,
g 27.DENIED
irst reading
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 27, 1984
Tape CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Philip B. Kravitz called the meeting to
1 order on Thursday, December 27, 1984, at 9:30 A.M., in the
Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Philip B. Kravitz
Vice Mayor Sydney M. Stein
C/M Jack Stelzer
C/M Raymond J. Munitz
C/M Allan C. Bernstein
ALSO PRESENT:
City Manager Elly Johnson
City Attorney Jon Henning
Asst. City Clerk Carol Barbuto
Secretary Joann Colwell.
MEDITATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Kravitz called for
a Moment of Silent Meditation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
43. Ratification of FOP Contract - Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by
Consent (see page.26)
City Manager Johnson requested that ratification of FOP Contract
be agendized by consent. C/M Stelzer so MOVED and C/M Bernstein
SECONDED.
VOTE:
LEGAL AFFAIRS
ALL VOTED AYE
24. FP&L Phoenix Substation - Discussion and possible action on:
a Authorization for the appropriate City officials to accept
an assignment of Deed Restrictions on this property from
Leadership Housing, Inc. - Tema. Reso. #3329
b) Authorization for the appropriate City officials to execute
a Release of Deed Restrictions placed on this property by
Leadership Housing, Inc. - Temp. Reso. #3330
c) Request for bonding waiver
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized
by Consent (see page8)
C/M Stelzer MOVED to agendize by consent waiver of bonding of
Florida Power & Light construction to be added as Item 24c and
C/M Munitz SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
26. Oasis Lounge at 3 Lakes Plaza - Discussion and possible
action on a request -._to„ provide for the extension of the
hours of operation beyond 2 P.M.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED
at the request of applicant
C/M Stelzer MOVED to TABLE this item at the request of the
applicant. C/M Bernstein SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
-1-
12/27/84
/jc
44. Temp. Ord. #1167 - Discussion and possible action on a pro-
posed Charter amendment from the Charter Board proposing the
creation of Section 5.06 of the City Charter prohibiting
elected and appointed officials of the City from interfering
with the activities of the City Administration. First Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized
by Consent (see page 27)
C/M Stelzer MOVED to agendize this item by consent. C/M Bernstein
SECONDED.
VOTE: C/M Bernstein AYE
C/M Munitz NAY
C/M Stelzer AYE
Vice Mayor Stein NAY
Mayor Kravitz AYE
PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
1. EmEloyee Service Awards - Presentation by City Manager Johnson
of Five Year Pins to Stephen A. Wood, Finance Director and
Richard Ruhl, Utilities West Department.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Five Year
Pins Presented.
City Manager Johnson presented the Five Year Pins to Stephen A.
Wood, Finance Director and Richard Ruhl, Utilities West Department,
and offered congratulations for their services to the City of
Tamarac.
2. Blood Donors Month - Presentation by Mayor Kravitz of a pro-
clamation designating the month of January 1985 as "National
Volunteer Blood Donor Month".
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Proclamation
presented.
Mayor Kravitz presented a Proclamation designating January 1985
as "National Volunteer Blood Donor Month" to a representative of
the Broward Community Blood Center.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
C/M Munitz referred to a memo dated 12/26/84 from John Letter,
Fiscal Assistant, concerning developers agreements and he noted
there are several items which state "No Existing Agreements".
He questioned City Attorney as to whether or not these items can
be considered without an existing agreement and Mr. Henning said
they can.
10. Mitchell Ceasar - Discussion and possible action on an agree-
ment regarding fees for Mr. Ceasar's continuing work on the
University Drive Widening Project.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: City Attorney
and Mr. Ceasar to prepare contract
to include terms agreed upon.
Mitch. Ceasar reported:
-University Drive was scheduled for expansion by the County in
the year 2000.
-In the past, he applied on behalf of the city, to DOT for bike -
path funds competing with many other cities in a 10 County region
and Tamarac was the only one to receive $100,000.
- Tamarac decided not to proceed with the bikepaths and he consulted
with DOT concerning transferring this money towards the widening of
University Drive.
-Some of the money had been spent, leaving $80,000 which was
transferred to the University Drive Project.
- He met with County staff and they agreed that money taken from
Tamarac developers would be spent in Tamarac, an amount of
$80,000.
-This total. of $160,000 was not matched in any way by money from
Tamarac
-Last month, he announced the remaining $100,000 in additional
guarantee monies from the County had been promised.
-There are an additional 15 steps remaining which govern the 2 3/4
million dollars necessary for the physical construction of University
Drive.
Mr. Ceasar gave a brief history of his association with the City
of Tamarac. He said he felt he played an important part for the
funding of the monies for the expansion of University Drive; and
that through his expertise and contacts, he is in a very good
position to pursue to its full extent the ability to get the
remainder of the funding for this project for the City of Tamarac.
Mayor Kravitz said that in Mr. Ceasar's report the City of Tamarac
received a quarter of a million dollars toward the first step in
getting University Drive widened.
Mayor Kravitz asked for clarification regarding Mr. Ceasar's new
contract.
Mr. Ceasar said his previous contract had been for $15,000 per
year; however, the agreement which he submitted to the City
Manager, in writing, states that he is to be paid a retainer of
$10,000 and, in addition, he will not bill any hourly fee for
the entire first year. He said because he assumes the project
may take approximately two years, the second year there will be
no retainer and he will be paid strictly on an hourly basis at
the rate of $75 per hour.
Mr. Ceasar said that a non-refundable retainer of $10,000 is to
be paid in a lump sum of $5,000 at the time of the contractual
agreement. The remainder to be paid in monthly installments
over the period of six months. Due to the retainer, no hours
will be billed to Tamarac regardless of time expended for one
calendar year. After that date, all time spent will be billed
at the rate of $75 per hour with monthly submissions, which is
exactly one-half of his hourly rate. Mr. Ceasar said that the
second year should not approach $5,000 for the year.
Vice Mayor Stein asked Mr. Ceasar to add to his contract that the
second year will not exceed $5,000. Mr. Ceasar said that he would
have no problem setting up a cap of $5,000 for the second year.
Mayor Kravitz asked whether the City of Tamarac could have
achieved this amount of money by themselves.
Vice Mayor Stein stated that as Liaison for the grants, he felt
that the City of Tamarac could "muddle" their way through this
project, but acknowledged that Mr. Ceasar knows how to do it
expeditiously. Vice Mayor Stein said he recommended that the
City employ Mr. Ceasar for this project.
C/M Munitz asked City Manager Johnson whether he could achieve
these monies and asked for his input.
City Manager Johnson stated that this money is not a grant, but
the hiring of a lobbyist to seek money for this project. He
said if Council want he and his staff to seek out this money
they will do so.
C/M Stelzer MOVED that the City Attorney and Mr. Ceasar get
together and draft an agreement between the City and Mr. Ceasar
including the items shown in his letter of 12/5/84, and the
addition of a cap of $5,000 for the second year.
C/M Bernstein SECONDED the MOTION.
C/M Munitz said he would rather have an actual agreement before
Council acts on this.
-3-- 12/27/84
i r.
Vickie Beech, resident, prevailed upon the Council to investi-
gate this contract further.
Walter Rekuc, resident, stated that he felt the monies could be
obtained by the City Manager.
Vice Mayor Stein asked Mr. Rubin, City Planner, to discuss with
Council whether Mr. Ceasar could expedite this project or not.
Mr. Rubin, City Planner, told Council that he had been instructed
to work with Mr. Ceasar to obtain funds for the widening of
University Drive. Mr. Rubin stated that the City needs the best
help it can get to obtain the funds and that Mr. Ceasar has the
greatest potential to assist the City now.
Mayor Kravitz said he is uncomfortable with approving something
without the agreement already drawn up.
Mr. Henning read into the record paragraphs one and two of the
letter of Mr. Ceasar. Paragraph one: "A nonrefundable retainer
of $1.0,000 to be paid in a lump sum of $5,000 at the time of the
contractual agreement. The remainder to be paid in monthly
installments over a period of six months." Paragraph two reads:
"Due to the retainer, no hours will be billed to Tamarac regard-
less of the time expenditure for one calendar year. After that
date, all time spent will be billed at the rate of $75 with
Tape monthly submissions." City Attorney Henning said that it will
2 now be: "at the rate of $75.00 an hour up to $5,000 for year
two."
Mr. Rekuc, resident, asked if there were any stipulations concern-
ing expenses and Mr. Henning read Paragraph 3, "All expenses
incurred shall be reimburseable upon receipt of original bill."
C/M Munitz asked to have paragraph 5 read and Mr. Henning read:
"I will be responsible for monthly written reports, in addition,
an oral presentation will be made to the Council on a quarterly
basis. My responsibility will extend to the funding of said
project." C/M Munitz said he would suggest tabling this until
the agreement is ready and agreed to by both parties.
VOTE: C/M BE!rnstein AYE
C/M Munitz NAY
C/M Stelzer AYE
Vice Mayor Stein AYE
Mayor Kravitz NAY
PRESENTATIONS AND AWARDS
3. Presentation b Ma or David Kaminsk of Lauderhill. Regarding
NW 64 Avenue.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED -
action will be taken at the
appropriate time in the future
after Tamarac completes an
engineering study.
Mayor Kaminsky of Lauderhill introduced Jim Smith, Chief Building
official of Lauderhill.
Mr. Smith distributed a sketch to the Council of the proposed 64
Avenue. Mr. Smith explained that 64 Avenue is one half in
Lauderhill and one half in the City of Tamarac. At present,
Lauderhill has a development called Boulevard Estates being con-
structed and the developer is required to install a section of
NW 64 Avenue. Mr. Smith said the sketch shows 40 feet of pave-
ment section in two lanes with a sixty foot median, half of the
median being in Tamarac and the other half being in Lauderhill.
It provides a 30 foot greenbelt on the Tamarac side and a 33 foot
greenbelt on the Lauderhill side. He said there will be one lane
north and one lane south with a median and no passing for the
length of 64 Avenue from Commercial Blvd. to 44 Street with turn
lanes.
-4- 1') / ) 7 /PA
Mayor Kravitz stated that the City of Tamarac is in the process
of making an engineering study of this situation. It was not
intended to take any specific action at this Council meeting nor
does Council intend to make any motions at this time, but only
to hear the presentation.
C/M Bernstein said that this matter has been before the Council
a number of times in the past. He said the attitude of the
City Council and the people has always been the same since this
road is of no value to the people of Tamarac. C/M Bernstein said
past Council action has always been that this 50 feet is desired
to be maintained as part of a barrier between Tamarac and whatever
may be built on the other side of 64 Avenue.
Leo Issaacson, Chairman of the Legal Committee for Woodland
Homeowners Association, stated that C/M Bernstein has very
correctly given the past history of this situation with respect
to 64 Avenue. He said that a four lane highway was absolutely
unnecessary not only for Woodland, but for any situation in
Tamarac and Lauderhill.
C/M Stelzer stated that the Department of Transportation and
all the engineers have been trying to get as many roads north
and south as possible. He said he thought that when the report
is received from the engineers, the City would consider making
this cut through as it would alleviate a lot of traffic.
Mayor Kravitz thanked Mayor Kaminsky and added that Council,
when the study is received, will consider the situation.
Mayor Kravitz called a two minute recess.
4. Presentation by Mayor A. "Beck "Gerren, City of Parkland -
TeM. Reso. #3455
YNOPSIS OF ACTION: Temp. Reso. #3455 RESOLUTION NO. R-84--415 PASSEQ
.gendized by consent and APPROVED..
Mayor A. "Becky" Gerren of Parkland stated she is appearing to
ask for help. She requested a resolution against the proposed
de -annexation of land from the City of Parkland. She said Park-
land has a developer that is asking the Broward County Legislative
Delegation for de -annexation of approximately 1,740 acres of
property in Parkland, which is approximately 25% of Parkland.
Mayor Gerren stated that the de -annexation of even one acre of
land is setting a precedent for every city in Florida.
Mayor Kravitz said that the Broward League of Cities is going to
back Mayor Gerren.
Vice Mayor Stein mentioned that the Broward League and also North-
west Broward Council have endorsed Parkland's position and MOVED
to agendize by consent Temp. Reso. #3455 endorsing Parkland's
position against the de -annexation. C/M Munitz SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. 3455 by title.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED approval of Temp. Reso. 3455. C/M Stelzer
SECONDED.
Mr. Henning said the backup he received stated 1,600 acres and he
asked is this was correct. Mayor Gerren said the correct number
is 1,740 acres. V/M Stein said he would accept that amendment in
his MOTION. (Note: C/M Stelzer, as the SECOND, did not comment).
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
Mayor Gerren thanked Council very much.
m'm
12/27/84
/jc
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
5. Sister City Project - Presentation
regarding package tour arrangements
Discussion and possible action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Council
selected the American Jewish
Congress as the travel agent.
by vaious travel agents
for the Sister City tour.
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3436 by title. (R-84-405
adopted December 12, 1984).
Mayor Kravitz stated he was uninformed as to which agents were
invited.
C/M Stelzer informed the Mayor that there were five (5) Travel
Agents in attendance.
Shirley Blumfield, Co -Commissioner, stated that all five travel
agents were in attendance. Ms. Blumfield stated she has an update
on one agent that she wanted to present. She requested that the
Council approve an agent, as it takes time for arrangements to be
made and a decision today would be appreciated. Ms. Blumfield
stated that she and Co -Commissioner Jack Weiner, have no recom-
mendations to make.
Dr. Newman, resident, stated that he does not understand how this
becomes City business since this is a private trip, by private
citizens from private organizations.
City Attorney Henning replied that it is a Sister City Project
between Kiryat Tivon and Tamarac. He said city dollars are not
being spent on the trip nor liability.
Hyman Fox, resident, stated he echoed the sentiments of Dr. Newman.
He stated that Tamarac is sending a proclamation along with those
going on the tour and Council should not take the time of the City
to consider this particular question.
Walter Rekuc, resident, stated that he understood that there were
restrictions as to religion, nationality, race and politics as to
who could go to that City. Why should City dollars be spent for
a few.
Mayor Kravitz said this was not true and City dollars would not be
spent on this tour.
Bernie Hart, resident, stated that on May 9, 1984, Ordinance
84-23 was passed which says, "an ordinance creating Section 2-47
of the City Code establishing the Sister City Committee to pro-
mote Sister City Programs." Nobody objected to it. Mr. Hart
stated at the last Council meeting he suggested that the five
travel agents be interviewed by the committee and that they should
come in with a recommendation for Council approval.
Milton Guberman, President of the U.S./Israel Trade and resident,
suggested that all agents should give time and itinerary, and it
should be wholesaled and bonded as a protection to the people of
Tamarac. Mr. Guberman offered his help and service with regard
to this trip at no cost to the City.
Mayor Kravitz suggested that the Co -Commissioners meet with the
five travel agents and come back to the next meeting with a
recommendation.
Ms. Blumfield stated she felt something concrete should be done
today since the representatives of the travel agencies were
present.
C/M Munitz stated that it appeared to him that the Council was
not fulfilling its obligation under the resolution that was passed.
He said the resolution is very clear and Council should proceed by
fulfilling their obligations under the terms of this resolution.
-6- 12/27/84
/jc
Mayor Kravitz noted that the resolution stated, "at the December
27th Council Meeting or as soon thereafter as possible."
C/M Stelzer stated that the Council members had the presentation
from all five agents, there is no reason to hear from the agents
again.
C/M Stelzer MOVED that the City accept the American Jewish
Congress as having offered the best Sister City Tour. C/M
Munitz SECONDED. Mayor Kravitz asked if this approved the
Resolution and C/M Stelzer said that is correct.
The representative from the Israel Department of Jefferson
Travel Agency, stated that she just gave a new proposal to the
Council which they had not seen yet, with new air fares. The
original proposal had an air fare of $866.00 and the air fare
has gone up $78.00 since the first proposal two months ago.
She suggested Council look the proposals over carefully.
VOTE:
UTILITIES WEST
C/M Bernstein AYE
C/M Munitz AYE
C/M Stelzer. AYE
Vice Mayor Stein AYE
Mayor Kravitz NAY
14. Utility Rate Analysis - James M. Montaomery Consulting
Engineers - Discussion and possible action on:
a) Acceptance of Phase I report.
b) Approval of payment for Phase I report.
c) Authorization for the appropriate City officials to
begin negotiations for Phase II and Phase III
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) Accepted,
b) Approved in the amount of
$5,000 c) Phase II approved in.
the amount of $18,800.
Steve Wood, Finance Director, introduced Mr. Dave Smith from
Tape James M. Montgomery Engineers. Mr. Smith reported that the
3 report before the Council is a philosophical discussion of how
rates are determined and certain criteria is set up for use in
the rate study. Mr. Smith stated that the rates Tamarac has
are becoming inadequate to cover the actual costs. The City
is about to begin engaging in some new sewer construction for
which the City is to issue bonds and, therefore, bonds will
have to be issued to cover the new debt service. He said
Tamarac is hoping to get a Federal or State Grant to assist
in the sewage construction funding and when that is done, the
rate schedule must be approved by the State of Florida Environ-
mental Regulation, which criteria must be met before the City
can get a grant.
Mr. Smith stated that James M. Montgomery is proposing that
instead of having a maximum on the sewer bills, based on 20
thousand gallons per residence per single family and 40,000
gallons for multi -family, it is being proposed that that be
eliminated primarily because one of the requirements of the
State and Federal Grant Agencies is that all users of sewage,
producing the same strength of sewage, are required to pay the
same cost per gallon.
C/M Bernstein said that he understood that when that rate was
set any usage beyond the minimum specified on water and sewer
for one meter was water being used for irrigation and not going
through the sewage system.
Mr. Smith stated that that is the normal assumption.
City Manager Johnson stated that if the City is going to accept
Grants, the City will have to proceed with this program to Phase I.
He said he recommends that Council adopt Phase II and go on with
this program.
-7- 12/27/A4
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to accept Phase I; SECONDED by C/M Munitz.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
b) Mayor Kravitz asked the City Manager if he would recommend
approval of payment of Phase I report and City Manager Johnson
said he would.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED approval of payment for Phase I in the
amount of $5,000. C/M Stelzer SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
c) City Manager Johnson made the recommendation that the Council
approve commencement for Phase II at a cost of $18,800. Vice
Mayor Stein so MOVED and C/M Bernstein SECONDED.
VOTE:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ALL VOTED AYE
33. Woodmont Tract 48 (Waterford at Woodmont) - Discussion and
possible action on:
a) Waiver on the provisions of the sign ordinance governing
signs on property other than the applicant's - Temp.
Reso. #3450
b) Renewal of a model sales permit and waiver of the 300-foot
distance requirement for certificates of occupancy.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED a) Two
temporary signs for one year from
12/27/84 and b) APPROVED to expire
7/25/85.
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-426_PASSEQ_
a) City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3450 by title.
City Attorney Henning said the entrance to the development of
Woodmont was from Southgate Blvd. and these signs are being
proposed on 81st Avenue on the east and west side of the street
at the entrance of Waterford. He said these are off -site signs
on property owned by the Country Club and Temporary approval is
asked for one year and must be renewed for each year after that.
Vice Mayor Stein mentioned that it has been approved by the
Beautification Committee and he MOVED approval of Temp. Reso.
#3450; SECONDED by C/M Stelzer.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
b) C/M Stelzer said the City has a check in the amount of $150 and
he MOVED the extension of the model sales permit. C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
LEGAL AFFAIRS
24. FP&L Phoenix Substation - Discussion and possible action on:
a Authorization for the appropriate City officials to accept
an assignment of Deed Restrictions on this property from
Leadership Housing, Inc. - Temp. Reso. #3329
b) Authorization for the appropriate City officials to execute
a Release of Deed Restrictions placed on this property by
Leadership Housing, Inc. - Temp. Reso. #3330 (tabled from
10/10/84)
c) Request for bonding waiver - Agendized by consent
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED
or further review (see page 1)
a) City Attorney Henning stated that deed restrictions came to light
& in the Title Search, that goes back to 1972. The City has asked
b) Leadership Housing to join in release of these deed restrictions
because FP&L would like to remove this cloud from the title.
-8- 12/27/84
Mr. Henning said that he has not yet gotten the written approval
from Leadership Housing, but he hopes to have the written approval
by the Meeting of January 9; therefore, he recommended that items
a) and b) be tabled.
C/M Stelzer MOVED the tabling of items a) and b); C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE;
ALL VOTED AYE
c) City Attorney Henning stated that he was approached by FP&L and
they are preparing their bid package and the cost to them and
the contractor will involve, possibly, a,bond. He said the
City Code in Chapter 24 requires a bond for off -site improvements.
He said the site plan anticipates possibly a right turn lane into
the substation, possibly, a median cut for a left turn lane,
sidewalks, some of which are required by Code, some of which
have been negotiated between the City and FP&L, and relocation
of the two catch basins and the culverts that go to the canal.
He said these improvements are required to be bonded for 100%
by a performance bond in case the project lapses and then the
City will call the bond and finish the public improvements.
Mr. Henning stated the second bond is a warranty bond in which
25% of the amount is held as a warranty in case within the next
year there is a defect in construction then it can be repaired.
He said that FP&L will waive all rights to a certificate of
occupancy on the substation if the City will allow them to fore-
go a performance bond. Mr. Henning said the real issue is
whether Council is interested in amending the City Code to
provide any type of waiver of the performance bond for the
benefit of FP&L in these circumstances.
C/M Bernstein said that the City Code was written for good
reason, the bonds are required, and FP&L is acting in good
faith, he is sure they will perform. He said that the City
should have bonds from everybody under the same circumstances
or nobody.
Vice Mayor Stein said that Council usually waives a performance
bond, if a developer is suffering a financial hardship. He
said FP&L is building a small power station and a premium for
a performance bond has to be negligible and an amendment to
the City Code would be required to accomplish this waiver.
David Cobb, representative of FP&L, stated that the letter
before the Council was not intended to get out of the money
situation. Mr. Cobb stated FP&L operates with Cities all the
time in good faith and have meters all around the City; and
the intent of the letter was a working accord type of arrange-
ment.
Vice Mayor Stein said he would be willing to take a document
from FP&L purporting to be a bond. lie said he does not need
an insurance company to guarantee their credit. He said if
FP&L would comply with a bond as written by the Code and they
will guarantee it, he said he would agree to that.
C/M Stelzer said he agreed with C/M Bernstein and does not want
to set a precedent. He said if the Council wants to establish
a variance procedure perhaps it should address public utilities
only.
City Attorney Henning read a portion of the Code, stating, "A
bond shall be cash, irrevocable bank letter of credit, cashier's
check or other negotiable instrument of surety bond written by
a company listed in the latest...". Mr. Henning stated that
in the past the Council has accepted assignments of interest -
bearing notes like a CD with interest and holds them for a year,
or whatever time is needed for a performance bond, and the
interest accrues to FP&L's benefit and at the end of the per-
formance period, FP&L gets the principal and the interest in
return.
-9- 12/27/84
/jc
Mr. Henning said it would be best for FP&L to follow what -is
in the Code now, that is, to consider an interest -bearing
instrument for their benefit. Mr. Cobb said they can work
this out.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to TABLE this item; SECONDED by C/M
Munitz.
VOTE:
COMMITTEES
ALL VOTED AYE
6. Burglar Alarm Review Committee -- Announcement of one vacancy
on this committee:
`''
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Vacancy
announced.
Mayor Kravitz said if anyone is interested in serving on the above
committee, please contact the City Clerk's office for an application.
7. Consent Agenda
a. Alan F. Ruf - Consulting City Attorney - 12/19/84 - $2,655.00 -
Approval recommended by City Attorney
b. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. -- Consulting Engineer -
Project 2080--0, Statement 2 - 9/19/84 - $434.00 - Approval
recommended by City Manager and City Attorney.
c. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. - Consulting Engineer -
Project 2080-0, Statement 4-11/5/84 - $86.50 - Approval
recommended by City Manager.
d. Muller, Mintz, Kornreich, Caldwell, Casey, Crosland & Bramnick,
P.A. - Labor Counsel - 12/6/84 -- $73.00 - Approval recommended
by City Attorney.
e. Shailer, Purdy & Jolly - Counsel for contraband forfeitures -
Services for November 1984 - $309.24 - Approval recommended
by City Attorney.
f. Billing, Cochran & Heath, P.A. -- Counsel for Saito vs. City
of Tamarac - 12/14/84 - $146.25 -- Approval recommended by
City Attorney.
g. Authorization to waive bidding procedures and procure certain
communications equipment for the Police Department from Mobile
Communications in the amount of $2,500.00, with funds to come
from Account 001-218-521--644, in order to retain a frequency
assigned by the Federal Communications Commission in January
1984.
h. Authorization for the City Manager to sign a permit application
with the State Department of Transportation for certain
beautification improvements to Florida Turnpike, Exit 20.
i. Authorization to Purchasing Agent to dispose of surplus equip-
ment that was offered for sale, but not sold, at the City
Auction on December 15, 1984.
j. Authorization to procure, under State Contract, a Ford Sedan
and a Ford Pick -Up Truck for Public Works in the amount of
$14,468.01 using Federal Revenue Sharing Funds allocated in
the 1984/85 Federal Revenue Sharing Budget.
k. Authorization to those City Council members desiring to parti-
cipate to attend the Florida League of Cities Pre -Legislative
Meeting in Tallahassee in February 1985.
1. City of Tamarac Vacation of Right -of -Way for a portion of
NW 67 Street -- Petition #2-V-84 - Approval to extend the
tabling action to a future Council Meeting.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
Items a) through j) and 1).
Item k) REMOVED for discussion
and then APPROVED.
Mayor Kravitz asked that Council consider separately Item k).
C/M Stelzer referred to Item c) Williams, Hatfield & Stoner's
bill in the amount of $86.50 and he questioned whether this will
be charged to the Charter Board's budget. City Manager Johnson
said he will check the invoice and if that is the correct account,
it will be charged to their budget.
-10- 12/27/84
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED approval of all Items with the exception
of Item k). SECONDED by C/M Stelzer.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
k) Mayor Kravitz stated that in the past four years no member of
Council has attended the Florida League of Cities Prelegislative
Meeting in Tallahassee. Mayor Kravitz said he is concerned that
this was included, as he can not see where it will help the City.
He said if all members went, there would be a cost to the City
even though it may be taken out of Council's allotted expenses.
City Attorney Henning stated that it is on the agenda because it
is out of the Tri-County area and it is usual to get approval
from Council in advance. The registration fee by ruling from
the past, will be outside Council's stated allotment and all
other expenses will be within the allotment. He said since the
motion from the past included only the Tri-County area, approval
for outside the Tri-County area is required.
Mayor Kravitz asked how the City will benefit.
City Manager Johnson stated that he has participated in the Florida
League of Cities Prelegislative Meeting in Tallahassee, it is a
working meeting. He said the legislative program is drafted; the
policy from the League of Cities is put before the Legislature
to give them a document so they know what the Cities want. City
Manager Johnson stated he had planned to attend, and Council must
advise him whether he can or not. He said he had been asked to
sit on one of the committees.
City Manager Johnson said he has found it to be a worthwhile
meeting because policies are discussed and the legislators can
be met. He said there is a special session for the City Attorneys
and it is important because they discuss legal problems that are
related to cities today. He said the Council of the City he
worked for in the past felt it was important to attend because
it is important to know what the legislature will be reviewing
when they meet.
Mayor Kravitz stated that he felt that City Manager Johnson and
the City Attorney are capable of representing the City and send-
ing a memorandum to Council telling of the findings and where
the City can or can not benefit. Mayor Kravitz said he can not
see five Council people attending.
Vice Mayor Stein said that this is the first time he had heard
a criticism of a Council that wants to work. He said this is
a working meeting to spend two days being informed about the
very pressing programs of density and grants. He said the
citizens should care that Council members want to go and be
well informed and find out what is happening in Tallahassee
which will affect the City of Tamarac. Vice Mayor Stein said
unless prohibited he intends to attend.
C/M Stelzer said that never before has the Council been involved
in outside conferences as to what is good for the City. He
said there is a Thursday and Friday session of Municipal/Finance
and taxation and he can benefit the City by going and seeing how
other Cities work in municipal finance and he intends to go.
C/M Munitz asked how much money is being discussed.
Mayor Kravitz responded with the amount of approximately $250
per person.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED that Council authorize any member of
Council who wishes to attend be authorized to do so. C/M Stelzer
SECONDED.
C/M Bernstein said that he felt that the people have expressed
a desire that Council people account for individual expenditures
and that they do not exceed the allowance set per year for any
individual Council person.
-11- 12/27/84
/jc
C/M Bernstein said no where does he hear or see anything that
says a Councilman should not do that which he thinks will be of
benefit for the City, so long as he properly documents that
expenditure and stays within the limitations of the budget.
VOTE:
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
C/M Bernstein AYE
C/M Munitz AYE
C/M Stelzer AYE
Vice Mayor Stein AYE
Mayor Kravitz NAY
8. Bid Award - Public Works Department - Discussion and possible
action on:
a) Awarding of a bid for aquatic plant control - Tem. Reso.
#3439.
b) Awarding of a bid for landscaping at the Florida Turnpike
Exit 20 - Temp. Reso. #3440
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) APPROVED
award of bid to Lake Doctors, Inc.
in the amount of $50,369.76 and
b) APPROVED award bid to Ram Plant
Growers in the amount of $14,881.
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-416 PASSED
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-417 PASSED
a) Mr. Henning, City Attorney, read Temp. Reso. #3439 by title.
City Manager Johnson recommended that the amount of the contract
be for $50,369.76 instead of $39,624.00 in order to include all
public and private waterways in the City. City Manager Johnson
recommended that all waterways, both public and private, be
considered in the bid.
C/M Stelzer stated that this had been done before and should
continue to be done.
Vice Mayor Stein stated he had received telephone calls from
citizens requesting private waterways be considered as well as
the public waterways. Vice Mayor Stein MOVED approval of Temp.
Reso. #3439 with the addition that the amount be changed from
$39,624 to $50,369.76 to include all private areas which are
presently being cleaned. C/M Munitz SECONDED.
Walter Rekuc, resident, said the City should get Quit Claims
to any waterways cleaned. He said the obligation is to the
City and he thinks it is a violation if private waterways are
cleaned.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
b) Mr. Henning, City Attorney, read Temp. Reso. #3440 by title.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED approval of Temp. Reso. #3440; SECONDED
by C/M Munitz.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
Florence Bochenek, Chairperson of the Beautification Committee,
stated that she was very happy that this finally has come to
fruition, she thanked Council and said ground breaking will
take place shortly. Vickie Beech, resident, asked if this was
State land that was being beautified and Mrs. Bochenek stated
it was turnpike property and they had to get permission to
beautify it.
9. Tamarac Police Department - Discussion and possible action
on recommendations by the City Manager regarding police
services contract with Broward Sheriff's Office. (tabled
from 11/14/84).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Council
directed City Manager to dis-
continue further negotiations
with the BSO.
-12-
12/27/84
/7 c
City Manager Johnson stated he had sent a memo regarding his
position. He recommended again that Tamarac stay with its own
police department and he asked Council. to consider that action
at this time.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to discontinue any further negotiations
with the BSO and stay with the present police department.
C/M Munitz SECONDED.
C/M Stelzer asked the City Manager if the ratification of the
FOPA Contract means that the members of the Police Department
agree that they do not want BSO.
City Manager Johnson said no, the Police voted on a contract
last night and accepted the City proposal.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
11. Broward League of Cities Business - Discussion and possible
action.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: No further
information.
Mayor Kravitz stated
stall not in, but the
come in shortly.
LEGAL AFFAIRS
that due to the holidays, the reports are
meeting will be scheduled and papers will
23. Bur lar Alarms - Temp. Ord. #1166 - Discussion and possible
action to regulate burglar alarm users and burglar alarm
devices under Chapter 14 of the Code. First Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED.
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Ord. #1166 by title.
C/M Stelzer said that the Burglar Alarm Ordinance has been around
for years and everytime a workshop is called nothing is accomplished.
He said at the last workshop the public suggested a three-month
test period where every call would be monitored. He said whoever
was monitoring the board would call the subscriber to find out
if it was a false alarm or not. He said, if it was not a false
alarm, a police officer would respond. C/M Stelzer said that
there was a test several months ago and it was found that it did
cut the number` of false alarms answered. He said if the Police
Department monitors the calls there will be additional costs to
the City. C/M Stelzer said he made a suggestion at the last
workshop to discontinue the police board and that subscribers
use a commercial operation where, for a fee of $5.00 a month,
every call would be monitored and each call traced back to see
if it is a false alarm. C/M Stelzer said that he did not hear
much objection to his suggestion and he MOVED that the City give
the subscribers notice that they have six months to attain a
commercial operation and discontinue the police board. C/M
Munitz SECONDED.
Vice Mayor Stein stated that the people asked for a three-month
test and C/M Stelzer is going to discontinue the City involvement
in six months. He said in all fairness there should be a work-
shop meeting. He said the people made a request that will not
be injurious to the City. Vice Mayor Stein said it would be
worth monitoring the calls, and the time it took to do the work,
what the cost would be, and then come up with the answer as to
whether a commercial operation would or would not be advantageous
monetarily. He said he, personally, feels that the board should
be removed from the Police Department; however, a three-month
test would be fair and everyone could look at the problem
intelligently and make a decision. Vice Mayor Stein said he
opposes C/M Stelzer's proposal and he proposed that when the
three-month trial period is over commercial operations come to
City Hall with their proposals so that facts can be presented.
-13- 12/27/84
/jc
C/M Bernstein stated that the purpose of the proposed three-
month test was not to find out whether it would cut down on
false alarms, that was satisfied adequately in the past. He
said the purpose of the 90-day trial period was to determine
if it was practical to screen incoming calls in the Police
Department and at the end of that period determine whether
there is justification for keeping the board in City Hall.
C/M Bernstein said he sees no harm in running such a test;
therefore, he opposed the Motion.
C/M Munitz asked if the three-month test period was in effect
now.
Vice Mayor Stein replied, no.
Vickie Beech, resident, asked in the event this test is completed
and a decision is derived, would it not be conflict of interest
for Council to be voting on this particular issue.
Leo Isaacson, resident, thanked Vice Mayor Stein and C/M Bernstein
for the progressive attitude they have taken. He said the 90-day
test was proposed and should be attempted. He stated he thinks
when the test period is over, Council may find many new facts.
He said that the users should be notified when this monitoring
system goes into effect.
Mayor Kravitz said that this 90-day test was not yet in effect,
and it is not now in motion.
Hyman Fox, resident, inquired as to how many homes are connected
to the Police Board.
Mayor Kravitz replied, "over a thousand".
Hyman Fox, resident, asked if the City was not subsidizing these
people.
Al Robbins, Chairman of the Burglar Alarm Committee, said that
in all the discussions he has been part of, he has never heard
any comment about the advantages of being hooked up to the
Police board. He said people in Woodlands have told him of the
tremendous amount of bills they have received while hooked up
to the Police board, due to false alarms. Mr. Robbins said he
believes it is an advantage to be hooked up to a private opera-
tion.
Louis Reese, resident, said he was amazed that the Council is
going to the trouble of tieing in certain sections of the City.
Mr. Reese said that anyone with a burglar alarm system should
have it hooked up to a private concern.
C/M Munitz asked how the MOTION was worded and C/M Stelzer said
the MOTION only concerned removing the board from the Police
Department in six months. He said there is a SECOND.
VOTE:
C/M Bernstein NAY
C/M Munitz NAY
C/M Stelzer AYE
Vice Mayor Stein NAY
Mayor Kravitz NAY
C/M Stelzer said there are 21 pages to the Burglar Alarm Ordinance
and C/M Bernstein sent him a letter which had 37 changes. He said
he has several questions to ask on the ordinance. C/M Stelzer
MOVED to TABLE this item until Council has a workshop of Council,
the Burglar Alarm Committee, the Police Chief, and the Building
Department with no public input.
Mayor Kravitz said that Council members should send recommendations
to the City Attorney. He said the City Attorney could draw up a
new Ordinance and at that time Council could consider it.
C/M Munitz said he would second the motion if C/M Stelzer would
amend it to read, a special meeting with the people mentioned.
-14- 12/27/84
/jc
C/M Stelzer said he amended the MOTION to read: A Special Meeting
of Council to amend the Ordinance with Council, Burglar Alarm
Committee, Police Chief and the Building Department.
Mayor Kravitz stated that a MOTION to TABLE was necessary.
C/M Bernstein said Council has discussed the burglar alarm ordi-
nance and have put off action time and time again. He said
Council had been presented, at the time of the workshop, a series
of 8 unanimous recommendations of the Burglar Alarm Committee.
He said they are simple, concise and would represent a substan-
tial improvement in the Ordinance. He said he sent to everyone
concerned a copy of proposed changes in the Ordinance as submitted
originally by the City Attorney. He said these changes do not
represent anything other than a consolidation of the recommenda-
tions of the Burglar Alarm Committee. He said at this time he
has received no written or oral recommendations or comments;
although he asked for them in his memo. He said he did have a
meeting with the Building Department and the City Manager to
determine if the training of an inspector from the Building
Department was a practical approach; and all agreed it was.
C/M Bernstein said that enough time has elapsed so that the
Council could act today.
C/M Munitz asked if the Ordinance has been changed to include
the recommendations which C/M Bernstein made. C/M Bernstein
said no, the Ordinance has not been changed to incorporate
these recommendations as yet. C/M Munitz said this is proof
that a workshop is needed for this purpose.
C/M Stelzer made a MOTION to TABLE; C/M Munitz SECONDED.
VOTE:
C/M Bernstein NAY
C/M Munitz AYE
C/M Stelzer AYE
Vice Mayor Stein AYE
Mayor Kravitz AYE
Mayor Kravitz announced a Special Meeting of Council to take up
the issue with all changes on the Burglar Alarm Ordinance.
Vice Mayor Stein made a MOTION to agendize by consent a 90-day
test period to be run by the Police Department on false alarms,
operation costs, and hours spent in keeping the board in the
Police Department. C/M Stelzer SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
Vice Mayor Stein said he would add to this item, the receiving
of bids from outside companies, who would do the exact work in
comparison to the cost to the Police Department. C/M Stelzer
SECONDED.
C/M Bernstein said the alarm ordinance makes no reference as to
where the board will be and voting on this test will have no
bearing on the alarm ordinance at all.
City Manager Johnson said he needs direction from Council on
this because this test will cause a great deal of confusion.
Vice Mayor Stein said private companies monitor these calls to
verify them and he asked that the question be called.
VOTE:
UTILITIES WEST
ALL VOTED AYE
16. Sewage -Treatment Plant - Discussion and possible action to
authorize an engineering feasibility study on relocation
of the sewage treatment plant.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
City Manager Johnson said that the City is now in the process of
doing work at the sewage plant and Council has had notifications
of odor violations.
_15- 12/27/84
/jc
City Manager Johnson made a recommendation that the City spend
approximately $5,000;hire an engineering firm to look at the
feasibility of moving the sewer plant from its present location
to an area known as Land Section 7. He asked for Council.
authorization.
C/M Stelzer MOVED to approve with a cap of $5,000; C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
Dr. Newman, resident and retired professor of sanitary engineer-
ing, said that a feasibility study is not necessary since the
plant is overloaded. He said instead of moving it and creating
another overloaded plant, the City needs a new sewage treatment
plant.
Vickie Beech, resident, asked how moving the plant will affect
the City grant. Mr. Johnson, City Manager, said it is not going
to create a problem with the grant, in fact, it will probably
help the situation. lie said the plant must be expanded by 1990
or before and the City will look at the whole possibility; expan-
sion and all, at one time.
VOTE.
ALL VOTED AYE
Mayor Kravitz called a recess until 1:30 P.M.
--16- 12/27/84
/j c
Mayor Kravitz called the meeting to order at 1:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Philip B. Kravitz
Vice Mayor Sydney M. Stein
(Entered at 2 P.M.),
C/M Jack Stelzer
C/M Raymond J. Munitz
C/M Allan C. Bernstein
ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Elly Johnson
City Attorney Jon Henning
Asst. City Clerk Carol Barbuto
Secretary Joann Colwell
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
27. Kin s Point Recreation Complex - Discussion and possible
action on:
a) Revised site plan for a pedestrian walkway, sod in lieu
of asphalt between tennis courts and a flagpole - Temp.
Reso. #3424.
b) Landscape plan (tabled from 12/12/84)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) APPROVED
with conditions b) APPROVED
RESOLUTION R-84-422 PASSED
a) C/M Stelzer read Temp. Reso. #3424 by title. He said staff has
recommended approval subject to:
- sign to be placed indicating walk is not for vehicular use.
- striping and signage to be provided at drop-off bay.
- all prior conditions of approval are still valid and in effect.
C/M Stelzer MOVED to adopt Temp. Reso. #3424; C/M Bernstein
SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
b) C/M Stelzer said that he spoke to Florence Bochenek and she
assured him that the landscaping for Kings Point Recreation
Complex had been approved by the Beautification Committee;
therefore, he MOVED to approve the landscaping plan. C/M
Bernstein SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
28. Ashmont- Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso. #3451
Disc cussion and possible action on a revised site plan to
reflect as --built setbacks and a fence around the lift station.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
RESOLUTION R--84-423 PASSEQ
Mr. Henning, City Attorney, read Temp. Reso. #3451 by title.
C/M Stelzer MOVED approval subject to all prior conditions remain-
ing in effect. C/M Munitz SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
29. University Texaco - Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso. #3452
Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan for
a catch basin and a trench drain.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED
for an agreement to be drafted.
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3452 by title.
C/M Munitz said Council has notification that there is no existing
agreement on this matter and he was opposed to taking any action
until such time as the City has an existing agreement in effect.
City Attorney Henning said that in the past when developers
asked for release of a Cash Bond, it was customary for the
Finance Department to investigage whether any money was owed
the City.
-17- 12/27/84
City Attorney Henning said that any time Council has a pre-1979
development Council would find it unlikely to have a water and
sewer agreement because that is when the City purchased the
utility plant.
Mayor Kravitz asked if an agreement is needed with Texaco and
City Attorney Henning said, no.
C/M Stelzer asked if a building is sold to another party does
the City have any kind of agreement with the new party.
City Attorney Henning said, yes, however, with a single tenant
an agreement is not needed.
C/M Munitz said there should be an agreement, so there is a record.
City Attorney Henning said he could create a document for that 10%
of the agreement that is not satisfied when a meter goes into the
ground.
C/M Stelzer said that the new agreement would have to be in
accordance with the Code as it is now. City Attorney Henning
said the issue is, who owes the City money, not if there is
an agreement.
C/M Munitz said he would like any item where Council has been
advised that there is no existing agreement, tabled, until such
time as Council receives an agreement.
Steve Wood, Finance Director, said that when the City bought the
utility in 1979 there was some development going on and the City
assumed the liability of those developer agreements. He said the
entire Woodland development does not have an agreement and the
same holds true for some commercial developments that are old
and have been assigned and re -assigned.
Mayor Kravitz asked Mr. Wood if he felt the City needed agreements
temporarily. Mr. Wood said no, the City has deposits for the
utilities and the City is delivering utility services, which
are on file.
C/M Munitz asked if the only violation is not paying their bill.
Mr. Wood answered yes, if the bill is not paid, service is cut
off.
C/M Stelzer read into the record, "staff recommends approval of
site plan subject to any conditions set down by the City Engineer."
He read a memo from the City Engineer dated December 26, 1984,
which stated that additional sidewalk easements are required for
the Texaco Service Station, site of McNab Road and University
Drive intersection. C/M Stelzer said the City Engineer requests
that if Council approve the revised site plan, approval should
include the condition that permits will not be issued until a
required sidewalk easement on the north side of this property
is provided. He said the City Engineer's memo states that
Broward County will construct this sidewalk along McNab Road.
C/M Stelzer continued reading the City Engineer's conditions:
- Texaco is to provide an easement to construct the sidewalk
along University Drive. The sidewalk should be 7-feet wide,
if possible, and if this interferes with existing facilities,
the sidewalk may be reduced to 5-feet.
C/M Stelzer MOVED to adopt Temp. Reso. #3452 subject to require-
ments as indicated by Bob Foy's letter of December 26, 1984.
Motion DIED for a lack of a second.
C/M Munitz MOVED to TABLE this matter until such time as an
agreement is drafted. City Attorney Henning suggested including
in the MOTION the language " that an easement is submitted as
required by Broward County."
-18- 12/27/84
/jc
C/M Munitz so amended his MOTION. C/M Bernstein SECONDED.
VOTE:
C/M Bernstein AYE
C/M Munitz AYE
C/M Stelzer NAY
Mayor Kravitz AYE
30. Tom Norris Restaurant - Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso. #3453
Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan to
reflect addition of a water heater zoom.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED,
then reconsidered and APPROVED
(see page 31)
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-432 PASSED
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3453 by title and said
there is no agreement.
TAPE Mayor Kravitz stated that he would hold the matter open until
5 2:10 so that interested parties could be in attendance.
C/M Munitz stated that there is no existing agreement and without
an existing agreement Council should not act on the matter.
City Attorney Henning stated that the utility bill for Tom Norris
Restaurant is up to date to December. He said the December bill
went out on December 5th for $410.80, so they owe for this month.
He said the City has a deposit for $460 on their account which is
$50 in excess of the amount.
C/M Stelzer said as there was no agreement he MOVED that the matter
be TABLED. C/M Munitz SECONDED.
VOTE:
UTILITIES WEST
ALL VOTED AYE
12. Ladder Safety_ Devices - Temp. Reso. #3454 - Discussion and
possible action'to procure these devices.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. R-84-418 PASSED
quote of D.S. Industries, Inc.
in the amount of $2,085.50
plus freight.
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3454 by title.
City Manager Johnson stated that it was his recommendation that
the bid of D.B. Industries, Inc. in the amount of $2,085.50 plus
freight be awarded for the procurement of these devices for TUW.
C/M Stelzer MOVED to approve Temp. Reso. #3454; C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
13. Bid Award -_Temp. Reso. #3441 - Discussion and possible action
to award a bid for back flow devices.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. R-84-419 PASSLD
award of bid to Sav-On Utility -
Supply in the amount of $2,848.05.
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3441 by title.
City Manager Johnson recommended that Sav-On Utility Supplies, Inc.
be awarded the amount of $2,8.48.05 for installation on the sewers
and water plant at TUW.
C/M Stelzer MOVED that Temp. Reso. #3441 be adopted. C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
-19-
12/27/84
/ic
1.5. Sludge Dewatering and Composting - Discussion and possible
action to award a contract for engineering services.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
authorized to enter
with CH2M Hill for
of $349,501.00
City Manager
into a contract
maximum amount
City Manager Johnson said that he had been authorized to negotiate
a contract with CH2M Hill and this had been done. He said the
price of the contract is $349,501.00 and it is his recommendation
that the bid be awarded to CH2M Hill to design, inspect, and do
all necessary work for the Dewatering Project.
City Manager Johnson defined the project for Council and said this
is a concept to handle the sludge problem for the City. He said at
the present time the City is using a farm in Land Section 7, but
this will not be allowed in the future. He said this is a compost
and dewatering operation and part of the money will come through a
State Grant. He said the City has been notified that Tamarac has
been moved up on the list and the City will know in April whether
the City has received the Grant. He said the original estimate
was 1.2 million dollars and the actual cost is going to be more
than that. He said that proposals from engineering firms had been
received, reviewed with a screening committee, and a report was
made to Council recommending CH2M Hill at the last Council meeting
and he was authorized to negotiate a price and the price is
$349,501.00. City Manager Johnson said he recommends that the bid
be accepted as the original price was approximately $700,000.
City Attorney Henning stated that the first choice was CH2M Hill
and the negotiating committee was able to cut the price in half.
City Manager Johnson said that the procedure followed complied with
the procedure used for deep well injection; the procedure estab-
lished working with Council. He said the City Engineer feels that
this is a reasonable price for the work.
Norman Karr, Park Commissioner, asked if this bid covers the dis-
posal of water. Mr. Johnson said sludge and dewatering. Mr. Karr
asked what amount is for engineering and how much for equipment.
City Manager Johnson said that Council is talking about the engineer-
ing phase; design, inspection and the grant application. He said
engineering has nothing to do with construction, except for the
inspection of the construction.
City Manager Johnson said the total cost of the project is $2.1
million dollars. He said this is to meet the current State EPA
and DEA regulations. He said it is the composting, disposal and
dewatering of the sludge. He said it is not just one part of the
operation, but the total operation.
Norman Karr, Park Commissioner, asked if the dewatering process
was the largest part of the total. He asked where the money is
coming from.
City Manager Johnson said the money is coming partially from a
State Grant and partially from the bond money. He said this project
was approved several years ago by Council. He said the cost of the
project is based on the State required acres for holding for com-
posting, the type of facilities that have to cover the composting,
etc.
C/M Stelzer asked Mr. Johnson if this will do away with the sludge
problem and City Manager Johnson said yes.
C/M Stelzer MOVED to authorize an engineering contract with CH2M
Hill for $349,501.00 maximum cost.
C/M Munitz asked City Manager Johnson what the estimated amount of
the grant would be and City Manager Johnson said that it would be
55% of the eligible cost and that usually equates to about 35% to
40%.
-20- 12/27/84
/j c
C/M Munitz asked if he was correct in that the money will come
from grants and bonds and City Manager Johnson said yes.
C/M Munitz SECONDED the MOTION.
C/M Bernstein asked the City Manager if this would solve the odor
problem and City Manager Johnson said that this would not apply
to that problem, this was getting rid of the waste of the sewer
plant.
VOTE:
ALL. VOTED AYE
17. Operations Building - Discussion and possible action on a
temporary facility.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Authorized
City Manager to go to bid for
purchase of facility.
City Manager Johnson said he had thought it possible for the City
to consider GSA bids, but he understands that the Charter prohibits
anything except State bids or County bids. He asked permission to
purchase a facility for housing of approximately 4500 square feet.
He said estimates have been from $90,000 to $100,000. He said it
would be fully equipped as it is set up on the site; the City would
have to pour a slab to set the facility on. He requested that
Council give authorization to proceed with the bidding process,
advertise for bids, and come back to Council for the awarding of
bids.
C/M Munitz MOVED for authorization for City Manager to go to bid
for purchase of this facility.
C/M Stelzer asked if this was in lieu of renting. City Manager
Johnson replied that at the present time they are not renting
and economically the City would be better off buying.
C/M Stelzer asked how long it would take the City to get its own
building and City Manager Johnson replied that the City would not
proceed with that building, under the bond program, until a
decision is made regarding the sewer plant. He said he will come
back with a recommendation.
C/M Stelzer SECONDED.
VOTE:
LEGAL AFFAIRS
ALL VOTED AYE
18. Waste Management, Inc. - Temp. Reso. #_3443 - Discussion and
^ossible action to ap
prove pprove an Addendum to the contract for
residential and condominium solid waste collection and
disposal.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-420 PA5SED,
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3443 by title.
City Attorney said that Waste Management Corporation has taken
over the garbage contract effective December 1, 1984 and it is
a three-year contract. He said he recommends approval of Temp.
Reso. #3443.
City Attorney Henning said that the fee for condos was approxi-
mately 20� and 50G for curbside.
C/M Stelzer asked the City Attorney if other cities give free
pick up to religious organizations.
Vice Mayor Stein answered that most of the cities that he knows
of, do not have free pick up for religious organizations.
City Attorney Henning said that the religious organizations have
not complained.
-21- 12/27/84
/jc
C/M Bernstein asked what happens on holidays when a six day work
week is established and City Manager Johnson answered that the
only day of the year they do not pick up is Christmas Day.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED for adoption of Temp. Reso. #3443; C/M
Stelzer SECONDED.
Key"
ALL VOTED AYE
• -.153 - Discussion and
9 City Council Salaries Temp. Ord #1
possible action on a proposed amendment to Charter Section
4.04 regarding Council salaries. First Reading. (tabled
from 12/12/84)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
on First Reading
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Ord. #1153 by title.
C/M Stelzer said he was the one who proposed this salary increase
in as much as he will not be affected by it. He said his reason
for introducing this proposal is that Tamarac is being held up
for ridicule by neighboring cities because of Council's salaries.
He said a $200 increase per month, as proposed, is strictly a
token salary.
Vice Mayor Stein said that a lot of misinformation has been handed
out. He stated that this has never been brought to Council before.
He said it has nothing to do with vouchers, expenses or with
reporting. He said the objection has been with vouchers or lack
of vouchers, to get an increase in salary. He said the reason
he is going to ask to Table is that some of the condos have
requested a clarification of Dr. Henkel's report. Vice Mayor
Stein volunteered to speak at various clubhouses in order to
enlighten the people on the subject. He stated that inflation
had reduced Council's salary and he wants to know how the people
feel about Dr. Henkel's report. Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to TABLE
for two weeks for those people who would like enlightenment by
any member of Council.
Mayor Kravitz stated that the last increase by Council was a
little less than 4 years ago when the salary was increased from
$1,200 a year to $3,600 a year.
C/M Stelzer asked if there was enough time for consideration, if
this is tabled for two weeks and City Attorney Henning stated that
Marilyn Bertholf, City Clerk, stated that the candidate closing
is January 16, 1985. He said two readings must be held for
referendum.
Vice Mayor Stein said he would withdraw his MOTION and for expedi-
ence put this on First Reading.
Vice Mayor Stein said he was withdrawing the TABLING MOTION and
MOVED to approve Temp. Reso. #1153 on First Reading.. C/M Stelzer
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
20. City Council Expenses - Temp. Ord. #1154 - Discussion and
possible action on a proposed amendment to Charter Section
4.04 establishing guidelines for Council expenses by
ordinance. First Reading (tabled from 12/12/84)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: REMOVED
ram the Agenda.
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Ord. #1.154 by title.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED that Temp. Ord. #1154 be REMOVED from the
agenda. C/M Bernstein SECONDED.
-22- 12/27/84
/jc
C/M Stelzer stated that the Mayor and Council members have a
certain amount of money for travel expenses for which they are
reimbursed. He stated that he claims reports filed in the past
2 1/2 years have been false and padded. He said the Charter
Board disagreed with him. He stated by eliminating this require-
ment from the Charter, the Council can police themselves. He said
if left in the Charter the way it is, anyone who wants to file
false reports can do so. He said the City Manager and Finance
Director do not examine these reports; therefore, whatever is
claimed is paid. He said that is his reason for taking this
out of the Charter.
C/M Bernstein said that he is in support of the MOTION. He said
that the people have had an adequate opportunity to express them-
selves on the question of whether or not they wanted expenses
detailed by voucher. He said it is up to Council to do what the
people want.
VOTE:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
C/M Bernstein
AYE
C/M Munitz
AYE
C/M Stelzer
NAY
Vice Mayor Stein
AYE
Mayor Kravitz
AYE
31. Tract 44 (northwest corner of McNab Road and NW 88th Avenue)
Discussion and possible action on:
a) Presentation by applicant of proposed new development
at this location.
b) Waiver of the platting requirements of Chapter 20 of the
Code for an administrative trailer and sign for temporary
use µ Temp. Reso. #3444.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: a) New
development deemed by Council
not to be necessary b) Temp.
Reso. #3444 APPROVED with
conditions.
RESOLUTION NO.-84-424 PASSED
a) City Attorney Henning asked to bring Vice Mayor Stein up-to-date
& as he was not present for a short period of time. He stated that
b) Item 29 and 30,. which were finished developments, were Tabled
because the Finance Department indicated there were no existing
water and sewer agreements. He said Tract 44 has no existing
agreement and for that reason some of the Council want to Table
the item.
Vice Mayor Stein said this Tract is under the Weissing Decision.
He said Council is dealing with a developer who has a legal decision
and has come in to make a proposition on development. Vice Mayor
Stein said in light of the Weissing decision and the developer's
cooperation with the City, the petitioner has agreed to comply
with the present Code. Petitioner is talking about signs which
have been approved by the Beautification Committee and this is
basically a waiver of platting.
C/M Stelzer said that Vice Mayor Stein was differentiating between
someone who has a court order and the items on the agenda that
were previously Tabled. C/M Stelzer asked City Attorney Henning
if the party needed an agreement and City Attorney Henning said
that eventually he will need an agreement; however, the applicant
does not owe the City money.
Wayne Peterson, Associate of McNab and Associates, said they will
be developing this property. He stated that at this point they
are in a very preliminary stage. He said they have come voluntarily
to the City to discuss plans to cooperate. Mr. Peterson stated
they are asking to use the trailer, which is on the site, and be
allowed to erect a sign that has been approved by the Beautifica-
tion Committee. He said in order to do this, they need a temporary
Waiver of Platting.
Vice Mayor Stein suggested that Council see the development con-
structed. He said this developer has just completed a project
similar to the one planned for Tamarac can Pine Island Road and
Sunrise, the shopping area has gray buildings and red awnings.
Mr. Peterson said they would be willing to sit down with staff.
Mayor Kravitz asked City Attorney Henning to read Temp. Reso.
#3444 by title.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED for the approval of Temp. Reso. #3444;
C/M Bernstein SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
LEGAL AFFAIRS
TAPE 21. Lease Purchase Agreements - Temp. Ord. #1164 - Discussion
6 and possible action on a proposed amendment to Charter
Section 7.13 to exclude these agreements from requiring
voter approval. First Reading. (tabled from 12/12/84)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
on First Reading. Second
Reading will be at Reconvened
Meeting on 1/16/85
City Attorney Henning referred to his memo. He said about a
year ago, Finance requested that Lease Purchase Agreements be
taken out of the Charter. He said the Charter says the City
cannot borrow funds without voter approval; technically, this
would apply to any amount. He said occasionally, there are
opportunities to purchase office equipment, etc. where it is
advantageous to have lease purchase agreements for one to
three years. He said Finance Department asked him to prepare
a resolution authorizing a referendum to allow these Lease
Purchase Agreements. Mr. Henning said he placed a ceilingof
slightly higher than $150,000. He said the Charter Board is
considering another amendment to this same section which
addresses the cost to the City and would take the grant money
and other funds out of the Charter. Mr. Henning said rather
than suggest to Council that there be two separate amendments
to Chapter 7-13 of the Charter, this Ordinance embodies the
cost to the City amendment as well as the lease purchase
allowance up to 1-1/2%
Vice Mayor Stein stated that Council has not had a chance to
read the amendment and he MOVED the approval of Temp. Reso.
$1164 on First Reading.
C/M Munitz asked if the Charter Board was creating a similar
amendment referring to the same section and City Attorney
Henning said the Charter Board is addressing this Chapter
and their amendment is identical to this.
C/M Bernstein SECONDED the MOTION.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
22. Redistricting - Temp. Ord. #1165 -- Discussion and possible
action to amend Section 2.10 of the Code to remove the
requirement that the report by the redistricting committee
be adopted by the City Council by ordinance. First Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED on
the First Reading. Second Reading
will be at the Reconvened Meeting
on 1/16/35.
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Ord. #1165 by title.
City Attorney Henning said this is what he considers a minor
"housekeeping" i cera. Ile said i;z t.ie past the redistrictin
report had to be approved by Council; however, the new Charter
amendment takes that away from Council
-24- 12/27/85
/Ir
City Attorney Henning said there is no approval authorized by
City Council and this amendment will clarify the ordinance so
that there is no inconsistency between the Charter and the
Ordinance.
Vice Mayor Stein said that they are amending the Code. Vice
Mayor Stein MOVED for approval of Temp. Ord. #1165 on the
First Reading. C/M Munitz SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
25. Fire Services - Temp. Reso. #3442 -- Discussion and possible
g action objectin-to any plans for Broward County to take
over municipal fire services.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
Temp. Reso. #3442 stating Tamarac's
objection to Broward County take-
over of municipal fire services
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-421 PASSED
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3442 in entirety.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to approve Temp. Reso. #3442; C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ALL VOTED AYE
. �' in disposition.#-3445
32. D'iscdussionrand possible action
Bond T - Warranty - emp. eso
tion regarding of
a warranty bond posted for public improvements.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
calling Letter of Credit
#1402-00304724 in the amount
of $58,095.32 if remedial
repairs not completed by
1/3/85 or if bond is not
extended by that date.
RESOLUTION NO. R--84-425 PASSED
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Reso. #3445 by title.
C/M Stelzer MOVED to call the bond; Vice Mayor Stein SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
34. University Community Hospital - Discussion and possible
action on:
a) Release of a performance bond posted for completion of
on -site work - Temp. Reso. #3446
b) Release of a performance bond posted for completion of
on -site beautification -- Temp. Reso. #3447.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
a) APPROVED releasing a performance
bond for on -site work in the amount
of $25,000 b) APPROVED releasing of
a performance bond posted for com-
pletion of on -site beautification
in the amount of $28,500
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-427 PA
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-428 PASSED
a) Mayor Kravitz asked Mr. Henning if there would be a conflict of
interest being Mayor and also being on the Board of Trustees of
University Community Hospital and Mr. Henning advised Mayor
Kravitz to abstain from voting.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3446 by title.
C/M Stelzer asked if there was an agreement with University
Community Hospital and Mr. Henning said that there is a Water
and Sewer Agreement.
*Attachment #1 (Memuxandun of Voting Conflict)
-25- 12/27/84
/jc
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to approve Temp. Reso. #3446; C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE:
C/M Bernstein AYE
C/M Munitz AYE
C/M Stelzer AYE
Vice Mayor Stein AYE
Mayor Kravitz ABSTAINED
b) Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3447 by title
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to approve Temp. Reso. #3447; C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE:
C/M Bernstein AYE
C/M Munitz AYE
C/M Stelzer AYE
Vice Mayor Stein AYE
Mayor Kravitz ABSTAINED
35. ColonyWest Country Club - Performance Bond - Temp. Reso.
#3448- Discussion "and possible action to call a perfor
mance
bond posted for public improvements.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
calling Letter of Credit #3UFM
in the amount of $32,689.50 if
warranty bond is not received
by 1/2/85.
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-429 PASSED
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3448 by title.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to approve Temp. Reso. #3448; C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
36. Swanson West - Performance Bond - Tem . Reso. #3449 - Discussion
and possible action to call a performance bond posted for
public improvements.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
calling bond 014-739 in the
amount of $10,997.25 if not
extended by 12/27/84.
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-430 PASSED
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3449 by title.
C/M Stelzer MOVED that Temp. Reso. #3449 be approved; C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE/FINANCIAL
43. Ratification of FOP Contract - Discussion and possible
action. Temp. Reso. #3456
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by RESOLUTION NO. R:84-431 PASSED
Consent. APPROVED for a term to
expire 9/30/86. (see page 1)
City Manager Johnson said that they had 13 sessions with the FOP
and final settlement has been reached and the contract was ratified
last night. He said 26 to 5 was the vote and it was his recommen-
dation that the Council ratify the contract.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED the approval of Temp. Ord. #3456; C/M Munitz
SECONDED.
Mr. Henning read Temp. Reso. #3456 by title.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
-2 6 -
-
12/27/84
/jc
44. Temp. Ord. #1167 - Discussion and possible action on a
proposed Charter amendment from the Charter Board pro-
posing the creation of Section 5.06 of the City Charter
prohibiting elected and appointed officials of the City
from interfering with the activities of the City Adminis-
tration. First Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: DENIED
on First Reading. (see page 2)
Mr. Henning read Temp. Ord. #1167 by title.
C/M Stelzer said that the Charter already spells out that Council
only has administrative duties and has no right to order anybody
in the City to do something. He said all orders must go through
the City Manager and he thinks this proposed amendment by Charter
Board is uncalled for. C/M Stelzer MOVED that Temp. Ord. #1167
be DENIED; Vice Mayor Stein SECONDED.
Mayor Kravitz said by voting yes, Council means no.
Vice Mayor Stein said he thinks this is one of the most absurd of
all the Charter amendments proposed and it is already in the
Charter.
Vickie Beech, resident, asked what Council calls citizens inter-
fering with administration.
Melanie Reynolds, Charter Board member, said this is not in the
Charter and the Charter Board took this wording directly from the
Cocoa Beach Charter that City Manager Johnson gave them. She
said it was more brief and direct and the Charter Board adopted
it because in many Charters this provision is included., She
said in Tallahassee it is a misdeamor if you interfere and there
is no penalty, but they feel that this is necessary as an inclu-
sion in the Charter.
C/M Munitz asked Mrs. Reynolds why the Charter Board did not act
on it and Mrs. Reynolds answered that the Charter Board did not
have time.
John Allfield, resident, said he was in attendance with the City
Manager when the Charter Board changed their proposal to the one
from Cocoa Beach. He said the proposal had nothing to do with
citizens, it asks that no one goes to any division without asking
the City Manager first. He said it sounded good to him and he
thought it would be adopted.
City Manager Johnson said that he felt that the proposal could
be clarified by the Cocoa Beach provision. He said the Charter
Board did adopt it and the only thing they changed was that they
put the Charter Board in, along with the City Council.
VOTE:
REPORTS
39. City Attorney Report
ALL VOTED AYE
Mr. Henning said County Public Hearings will be held on the Sewer
Treatment Plant on the first Friday in January and the County has
requested a continuance.
38. City Manager Report
No report.
37. CiLZ Council Reports
C/M Bernstein had no report. C/M Munitz had no report. C/M Stelzer
had no report. Vice Mayor Stein said that Concord Village is now
in one district for voting purposes. Mayor Kravitz had no report.
Mayor Kravitz recessed the meeting until the 5:05 P.M. Public
Hearings.
-27- 12/27/84
TAPE Mayor Kravitz reconvened the meeting at 5:05 P.M.
7
PUBLIC HEARINGS
40. Zoning Regulations - Temp. Ord.. #1142 - Discussion and
and possible action to amend Chapter 28 of the Code to
provide for municipal government uses in addition to
institutional and educational uses in an I-1 district.
Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED
on Second and Final Reading to
provide for municipal govern-
ment uses in an I-1 district.
ORDINANCE NO. 0-84-70 PASSED
Mr. Henning read Temp. Ord. #1142 by title.
Mayor Kravitz opened the Public Hearing
Melanie Reymonds, Charter Board member, said since this is under
the court order of 1973, she does not think Council has the liberty
to change it.
Mayor Kravitz closed the Public Hearing with no further response.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED the approval of Temp. Ord. #1142 on Second
and Final Reading; C/M Munitz SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
41. City of Tamarac - Rezoning Petition #30-Z-84 - Temp. Ord.
#1161 - Discussion and possible action to rezone the City
awned lands on the west side of NW 88 Avenue at NW 75
Street (also known as Tract 38--A) from S-1 (open Space/
Recreational) to I-1 (Institutional/Educational). Second
Reading.
a) Acceptance of Affidavit of Publication and Affidavit of
Posting.
b) Consideration of application.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: APPROVED on
Second and Final Reading rezoning
City owned Tract 38-A. Accepted
a)
ORDINANCE NO. 0 84-71 _PAS_SEp
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Ord. #1161 by title.
a) Mayor Kravitz asked City Clerk if Council had the acceptance of
the Affidavits of Publication and Posting and Assistant City
Clerk answered in the affirmative.
C/M Stelzer MOVED acceptance of affidavit of publication and
affidavit of posting. C/M Munitz SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
Mayor Kravitz opened and closed the Public Hearing with no response.
b) Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to approve Temp. Ord. #1161 on second and
final reading; C/M Stelzer SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
IWIVC
12/27/84
/jc
42. Administrative Reduction to Setbacks - Temp. Ord. #1125
Discussion and possible action to create Code Section
28-194.1 to permit administrative reductions to setbacks,
establish procedures for application, processing of rulings
and appeals. Second Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION; APPROVED
Temp. Ord. #1125 on Second and
Final Reading as amended.
ORDINANCE NO. 0-84-72 PASSED
City Attorney Henning read Temp. Ord. #1125 by title.
City Attorney Henning said that this Ordinance had been discussed
and revised many times. He advised Council that their back-up
materials contained the revisions of December 12, 1984. He said
at a recent meeting of the Board of Adjustment additional sug-
gestions were made, which Mr. Henning had penciled into the
copy given to Council.
Mayor Kravitz opened the Public Hearings.
John Hamilton, member of the Board of Adjustment, said they
asked the City Attorney if he would make some minor changes.
He said on page 3, item e) they asked that the "Director of
Community Development shall convene a meeting of the Board of
Adjustment within 30 days", they asked the wording be changed
to the effect that the Director would submit it at the next
meeting of the Board of Adjustment rather than call a special
meeting of the board.
John Lachman, member of the Board of Adjustment, said that the
Ordinance was issued on 11/2/84 and revised on 12/11/84. He
said at the workshop meeting he proposed a change to the Florida
Statues to include a self-imposed hardship rather than a non -
self -imposed hardship. He said at that time there were 6
people at the meeting and 4 were against going through the
delegation to consider this for the hearing of the legislature
in April. He said if they went to the legislature with this
particular item we may suffer on another item which we may want
to pass. Mr. Lachmann said he does not see where this is any
change from a previous ordinance where it was called a variance.
He said this is called an administrative setback and all Council
is doing is changing words and on October 3, 1984, Mr. Henning
wrote a letter saying it was illegal, based on the original
ordinance covering administrative variances.
John Fleming, resident, said he had a few questions regarding
this matter. He asked if existing violations will be "grand -
fathered" in under this legislation.
Mr. Henning said there is no "grandfathering" and existing viola-
tions could possibly seek application and would be required to
have approvals and notices as specified in the ordinance. He
said this is a procedure that provides for an application and
approval by the Board of Adjustment. He said there is nothing
in the ordinance that would preclude people that have so called
violations from applying to receive approval to validate these
conditions. He stated that the Board of Adjustment frequently
considers variances of present violations, non -conforming uses,
that seek approval and they give their approval after the
existence of the violation, so that the owner of the property
can continue to develop his land within the law. He stated it
is not "grandfathered" in, but it can not preclude people from
making application to receive approvals. He said that is no
different from ordinary variances.
John Fleming, resident, asked what due process of law could
adjacent property owners have under this ordinance.
Mr. Henning said they could appeal to the Circuit Court. He
said they have the right to appear and they will be noticed to
appear for the hearing and they can state their opinions.
-29- 12/27/84
Mr. Fleming, resident, stated he noted the error on page 2,
line 33, where the word "may" was used. He said he could
accept "shall"; however, he would prefer the word "must".
He said page 1, line 29, "an application may be made from a
homeowner", he stated that perhaps the Council wanted to use
the word "by".
Mayor Kravitz closed the Public Hearing with no further response.
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED for the approval of Temp. Reso. #1125
as amended on Second Reading. C/M Stelzer SECONDED.
C/M Munitz asked Mr. Henning if this is legal.
Mr. Henning said yes. He stated that the Board of Adjustment
was questioning whether or not it would be more appropriate for
them to remain as appellate body or whether the building official
should conduct a hearing and stand back. Mr. Henning said that
the way Temp. Ord. #1125 stand now he feels it is legal and the
Board of Adjustment will be hearing the initial hearing.
C/M Munitz asked if on page 3, line 28, the word "lapse" should
be "lapsed".
Mr. Henning stated it shoud be present tense. He also said he
would like to add an i) below h) on page 3, which says that "the
decision of the Board of Adjustment shall be final." He said
he would ask Council to resolve a discrepancey as to whether or
not they want page 2, c) last sentence: "written approval of the
adjacent property owner" or do they want "written notice to the
adjacent property owners". He said there is also a minor detail
as to whether they want mailing costs to be included.
Vice Mayor Stein said he thought this was discussed and he sug-
gested mailing because there are times when adjacent property
owners are out of town. He said the form used for all variances
should be used. He said the mailing fee should be paid by the
applicant and they should pay a fee of $150 to apply.
Vice Mayor Stein said the applicant should pay for the mailing.
He said "written notice" should be used rather than "written
approval". He said that whatever form the Board of Adjustment
is using at the present time for official notice should be the
same here.
Mr. Henning said that means "notice to the adjacent owners
posting of the property, no advertisement, and no mandatory
approval of the adjacent owners."
C/M Stelzer said there had been several cases regarding Golf
Courses where Council had insisted on written approval from
adjacent property owners.
Vice Mayor Stein said that this Temp. Ord. applies to the Board
of Adjustment; this ordinance is not coming to City Council.
C/M Bernstein asked if, in the rewording of f) the words "and
homeowner's association" are being dropped.
Vice Mayor Stein advised C/M Bernstein those words would not
be dropped.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
-30- 12/27/84
/jc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
30. Tom Norris Restaurant -- Revised Site Plan - Temp. Reso. #3453
Discussion and possible action on:
a) Revised site plan to reflect addition of a water heater
room.
b) Water and Sewage agreement
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: TABLED RESOLUTION NO. R-84-432 PASSED_
reconsidered and APPROVED subject
to two 4-inch diameter concrete
filled pipes being attached to
inside of existing curbing.
(see page 19)
Mr. Rubin, City Planner, said the representative of Tom Norris
was in the audience and he asked for reconsideration of this
item and addition of a b) item. He said that the b) item would
be, acceptance of Water and Sewer Agreement.
Mr. Rubin stated that C/M Stelzer was referring to a memo from
the Finance Director. He said this morning Council received a
letter from the Finance Director stating there was no water and
sewer agreement. Mr. Rubin said Council made a policy and said
from now on they wanted water and sewer agreements for approval
of a project. He said this afternoon the Finance Director
corrected his memo saying "in the past there was a water and
sewer agreement, however, they do not have a copy in their
files". He said Tom Norris paid the water bill of $410.30
outstanding and asked if Council wants to approve the new water
and sewer agreement.
Mr. Wood, Finance Director, stated that their files indicate
that there was an accepted agreement.
Vice Mayor Stein said the memo stated the City shows an agreement
as completed. He said the agreement was with Tamarac State
Enterprises, Inc., which he assumed was Tom Norris.
C/M Stelzer asked what a renter has to do with a water and
sewer agreement. He said it goes back to the original owner of
the property and the City should not demand a new one.
Mr. Henning said that City records show that Tom Norris does not
owe Tamarac any money. He said there was a water bill a few days
overdue and the check was brought in today. He said the purpose
of the memo was to indicate to Council whether or not the developer
owed the City money; not whether there was a particular contract
on file.
C/M Stelzer MOVED to remove the item from. TABLE. Vice Mayor Stein
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
Vice Mayor Stein MOVED to approve Temp. Reso. #3453; C/M Stelzer
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
Mayor Kravitz adjourned the meeting at 5:35 P.M.
- MX-1,11aw-Re,
MAYOR
ATTEST:
AS ISTANT CITY CLERK
This public document was promulgated at a cost of $ 23R.4o or $�-4S per copy
to inform the general public and public officers and employees about recent
opinions and considerations by the Council of the City of Tamarac.
CITY OF TAM C -31- 12/27/84
/ C
APPROVED. AT MEETING OF
Item 34 — University Comunity Hospital
FORMA ME- IRANDUM OF VOTIF WCONFLICT
wtBT NA E — FMST NAME — MIDDLE NAME AGENCY is unit Of: DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
[]STATE V,t/y1NG ADDRE S NAME OF PERSON Rt i"NO MINUTES
5811 NORTHWEST TH V ❑COUNTY MARILYN BERTHOLF
;ITY Zip COUNTY TITLE OF PERSON RECORDING MINUTES
TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321 BR01iAU ®MUNICIPALITY CITY CLERK
SAME OF AGENCY SPECIFY
CITY OF TAMARAC ❑OTHER
MEMORANDUM OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN A VOTING SITUATION [Required by Florida Statutes §112.3143 (1979) ]
I you have voted in your official capacity upon any measure in which you had a personal, private, or professional interest which inures to
your special private gain or the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained, please disclose the nature of your interest
below.
1. Description of the matter upon which you voted in your official capacity:
UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL — TAMARAC CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERED APPROVAL OF ON —SITE WORK
AND RELEASE OF TWO (2) PERFORMANCE BONDS. I ABSTAINED. THE COUNCIL APPROVED THE RELEASE.
2. Description of the personal, private, or professional interest you have in the above matter which inures to your special private gain or
the special private gain of any principal by whom you are retained:
I SERVE, WITHOUT RENUMERATION, AS A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, 7201 NORTH UNIVERSITY DRIVE, TAMARAC. I RECEIVE NO PERSONAL
OR MONETARY GAIN FROM THIS POSITION.
3. Person or principal to whom the special gain described above will inure: SEE #2 ABOVE
a.0 Yourself b.❑ x=xxX
(NAME)
;IGNATURE DATE ON WHICH FORM 4 WAS FILED WITH THE PERSON
t RESPONSIBLE FOR RECORDING MINUTES OF THE MEETING AT
�. WHICH THE VOTE OCCURRED:
AF December 28, 1984
FILING INSTRUCTIONS
This memorandum must be filed within fifteen (15) days following the meeting during which the voting conflict occurred with the person
responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who shall incorporate the memorandum in the meeting minutes. This form need not be
filed merely to indicate the absence of a voting conflict. Florida law permits but does not require you to abstain from voting when a conflict
of interest arises; if you vote, however, the conflict must be disclosed pursuant to the requirements described above.
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES 1112.317 (1979). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES
GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE
OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY. RZPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED a6.000.
E FORM 4-REV. 12.79