HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-08-04 - City Commission Special Meeting Minutes51811 NCiR1 HWNi. 37' 881H AitFNl)E . TAMAFiAC, FLORIDA 33321
T El..FPHONF' (305) 722-5900
SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
TAMARAC, FLORIDA
Please be advised that the City Council may add the following
items to its agenda of August 4th, 1981
Item #3: Proclamation — Presentation by Mayor Walter W. Falck
of a Proclamation designating the Week of August 31st
to September 4th, as "Water and Pollution Control
Operators Week". (Requested by Mayor Falck)
Item #4: Public Works De artment -- Bid Authorization -- Discussion
and possible action to authorize the City Manager to go
out to bid for a curb sweeper. (Requested by C/M Zemel)
Council may consider such other business as may come before
them.
MB:mr
8/3/81
City Clerk
Pursuant to Chapter 80-105 of Florida law, Senate Dill No. 368:
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City
Council with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or
hearing, he will need a record the proceedings and for such
purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
0
P.O. Box 25010
Tamarac, Fla. 33320
27
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
TAMARAC, FLORIDA
First Class
The City Council of Tamarac will hold a Special Meeting
on Tuesday, August 4, 1981 at 9:30 A.M. in Council Chambers
of City Hall, 5811 N.W. 88th Avenue, Tamarac.
The purpose of this Meeting is to consider and take action
on the following items:
Item #1: Occupational License - Classifications - Temp Ord. #899 -
Discussion and possible action to amend Ordinance No. 80-91-
Occupational License Fee Schedule by the revising the
classifications. Second Reading - Public Hearing
Item #2: Ad Valorem Tax Millage - Discussion and possible action
to:
a) Establish proposed millage rate.
b) Designate dates for first hearing to adopt
tentative budget F.Y. 1981/82.
Council may consider such other items as may come before it.
The public is invited to attend.
/mr
7/30/81
Marilyn 4ertHblf
City Clerk
Pursuant to Chapter 80-105 of Florida Law, Senate Bill Ro. 3w;
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City
Council with respect to any matter considered at such or
hearing, he will need a record the proceedrng.s er,d fa•
purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim recc-J' .1 r
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to oe
r:b 8, 'i 'i N 0 P i -F. i-i V) t= S 8 k "'F H l-A V I~ r N U 9' 7- A IVI A R A C: , F i- U i i i 1) A 33321
(305) 722-5900
SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
TAMARAC, FLORIDA
Please be advised that the City Council may add the following
item to its agenda of August 4th, 1981:
Item #5: Springlake II - Discussion and possible action
on revised north and south site plans.(Requested by
Mayor Falck)
them.
CAE:mr
8/3/81
Council may consider such other business as may come before
Carol A. Evans
Assistant City Clerk
pursuant to Chapter 80.105 of Florida law, Senate bill No, 3681
if a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City
Council with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or
hearing, he will need a record the proceedings and for such
purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record Includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based,
CITY OF TAMARAC
SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL
August 4, 1981
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Falck called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.M.,
Tuesday, August 4, 1981, in the Council Chambers.
ROLL, CALL: PRESENT: C/M Philip Kravitz
C/M Irving Zemel
C/W Helen Massaro
V/M Irving M. Disraelly
�. Mayor Walter Falck
ALSO PRESENT: Laura Stuurmans, City Manager
Arthur M. Birken, City Attorney
2. Ad Valorem Tax Millage - Discussion and possible action on Temporary Resolution
#2020
a) Establish proposed millage rate.
b) Designate dates for first hearing to adopt tentative budget F.Y. 1981/82.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by majority consent.
(See Pages 5, 6 & 7)
V/M Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY MAJORITY CONSENT, the Ad Valorem Tax Millage
discussion and possible action to establish a proposed Millage rate and designate
dates for a first hearing to adopt same since at 4:00 yesterday afternoon the
City received a letter from Mr. Markham, and he thought Council should take some
action.
C/W Massaro SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
3. Proclamation - Presentation by Mayor Walter W. Falck of a Proclamation
designating the Week of August 31st to September 4th, as "Water and Pollution
Control Operators Week". (Requested by Mayor Falck)-
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Majority consent.
(See Page 3)
V/M Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY MAJORITY CONSENT, the Proclamation requested
by Mayor Falck designating the Week of August 31st to September 4th, as "Water
and Pollution Control Operators Week".
C/M Zemel SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
4. Public Works Department - Bid Authorization - Discussion and possible action to
authorize the City Manager to go out to bid for a curb sweeper. (Requested by
C/M Zemel).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Majority consent.
(See Pages 4 & 5)
C/M Zemel MOVED to AGENDIZE BY MAJORITY CONSENT
Manager to go out to bid for a curb sweeper.
C/W Massaro SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
Bid Authorization for the City
5. Springlake II - Discussion and possible action on revised north and south site
plans. (Requested by Mayor Falck)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Agendized by Majority consent.
(See Pages 3 & 4)
C/W Massaro MOVED to take the item of Springlake IT --Discussion and possible
action on revised north and south site plans off the table and to AGENDIZE BY
MAJORITY CONSENT the same item.
C/M Zemel SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
-1-
8/4/81
/ss
1. Occupational License - Classifications - T . Ord. #899 - Discussion and
possible,action to amend Ordinance No. 80-91 - Occupational License Fee
Schedule by revising the classifications. Second Reading - Public hearing,
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved on second reading
with conditions.
ORDINANCE NO. O/-� PASSED
Arthur Birken, City Attorney, read the Ordinance by title
into the record. He went on to advise the Public that there are no increases
in Occupational License taxes, and that this is only to clarify the classifi-
cations since Council is not permitted to make any increases.
V/M Disraelly wanted to make a few corrections, which are listed below:
On Page 4 insert under Elevator Contractor, under CONTRACTORS, insert $120.00,
this sits o Line 26.
On Page 6 on Line 302, Personal Finance Companies is shown as $229.00, where
others are 225.00. He suggested to change the amount to $225.00.
On Page 7 on Line 27 HANDYMAN, General Repair, Maintenance, etc. a figure of
$150.00 is s own, w ich he felt is too high since there is a figure shown for
Repair Shops of $100.00. C/W Massaro recommended the amount of $50.00, and V/M
Disraelly stated that he was going to suggest the same figure.
At this point C/M Zemel asked Mr. Birken, the City Attorney, a question. He
stated that he noticed that in the Ordinance there is no reference to the fact
that the first $50.00 of any Occupational Fee is forgiven to any disabled Veteran
receiving compensation. Marilyn Bertholf, the City Clerk stated that this Item
is covered under the City Code in Chapter 14. Mr. Birken advised that same is
in Section 14-24.
Mayor Falck questioned the amount of $843.75 under Gasoline Trucks on Page 7,
and was advised by V/M Disraelly that this is the same amount as last year and,
at that time,it was raised 25% and came out to an odd figure.
V/M Disraelly continued with his corrections, which are listed below:
On Page 8 he wanted an item clarified. Insurance Adjuster is $10.00. In the
next paragraph it states "However, agents and solicitors writing more than one
kind of class of insurance shall pay $60.00 for each class thereof." He asked
what the $10.00 figure pertains to, and was advised by Mayor Falck that the
Adjuster is not a solicitor, and does not sell insurance.
Mayor Falck pointed out that Page 8 was revised in length, and asked the City
Clerk whether she had any questions pertaining to the change. Ms. Bertholf,
City Clerk, stated that she felt the change cleared up some points and redun-
dancies. Mayor Falck stated that this change was basically made to clarify
the item of Accident & Health Insurance.
V/M Disraelly continued, as follows:
Page 11, Line 182 under NEWSPAPER PUBLISHER, he wanted to know the status of
semi -weekly newspapers, since it's not mentioned, and wanted to know whether
semi -weekly newspapers should be added to this line. It was agreed that all
three classifications should be on the same Line.
Page 14, Line 26, under TAX PREPARATION SERVICE, the amount shown is $150.00
for non-professional, but under PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANT the amount is $140.00,
therefore, the latter amount should be changed to $140.00, which C/W Massaro
agreed should be done.
Mayor Falck mentioned that on Line 12, the amount shown for SECURITY COMPANIES
is $100.00, he wanted to know aaut�Security Salesmen. Ms. Bertholf, City Clerk,
advised that this amount covers security guards. She went on to point out that
on Page 1 under the ABSTRACT, Line 1612r mentions "SECURITY COMPANY". It was also
pointed out that Page 13, Line 7,_sh6ws "b. Selling stocks, bonds, etc.----$202.50".
C/W Massaro brought up the $202.50 item. It was agreed that on Page 13, Line 7
item "b" should be deleted completely, and the letter "a" will no onger needed.
It was also agreed that on Page 14, Line 12 after "SECURITY COMPANIES" the words
" Guard services, etc. "shoul be add It was decided to delete the words "SE-
CURITY COMPANY" on Page 1, Line 15.
Page 15, Line 31,it was agreed to add the word "activity" to the end of the sentence,
which was suggested by V/M Disraelly.
Page 16, Line 28, SECTION 7 should be changed to SECTION 5, per V/M Disraelly.
Ms. Bertholf, City Clerk, suggested that on Page 9, Line 192, by Knife & Scissor
-2-
8/4/81
/ss
Sharpener, which is also included under Repair Shop with a $70.00 fee, the wards
"See Repair Shop" should be added and the fee deleted. .She went on to suggest
that on Page 9, Line 29�, by MAINTENANCE COMPANY, the words "Janitorial Service"
be added. She also said that on Page 12, Line 103-, by PRIVATE SCHOOL, she would
add the word "Academic'.
At this point, Mayor Falck opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. William Sutter, of Sutter Ace Hardware, introduced himself and brought up
the item of HANDYMAN on Pace 7, Line 27. He suggested that the fee for same be
reduced to $25.00 rather than the $50.00 recarrmended by Council, since most handy-
men are retired people who are supplementing their income. It was decided by
Council to keep the tee at $50.00, which was recommended by V/M Disraelly and
C/W Massaro.
Mr. Sutter asked the Council whether these fees are going to be accumulated.
He stated that they do repairs, on items such as vacuum cleaners, and asked
whether he would have to take out a separate license for this work. The City
Clerk, Ms. Bertholf, stated that if it's a service for which they do not earn
an income and do not advertise, it is not considered a business.
V/M Disraelly brought up the fact that a supermarket, such as Publi.x, is only
covered under the Merchant category, and it was his feeling that they should
be required to take out separate licenses, such as for their bakery and their
meat market, since numerous categories are listed which they would fall under.
C/W Massaro agreed with this statement, however, Mr. Sutter disagreed.
Mr. Birken, the City Attorney, suggested that council advise the City Clerk to
make an adjustment in the bill for supermarkets, if it so desires.
V/M Disraelly MOVED the adoption of Temporary Ordinance #899 on second reading
with the following conditions.
1.
Page 1 - Line
15
- Delete the words "SECURITY COMPANY".
2.
Page 7 - Line
28
- HANDYMAN - Change fee to $50.00.
3.
Page 9 - Line
19
- Insert the words "See Repair Shop" and delete the fee
of $30.00 .
4.
Page 9 - Line
29
- Under MAINTENANCE COMPANY add the words "(Janitorial
Services)w
5.
Page 11 - Line
18
-b. Weekly, semi -weekly or monthly under "NEWSPAPER".
6.
Page 12 - Line
10
- After the ward PRIVATE SCHOOL add (Academic).
7.
Page 13 - Line
7
- Delete the letter "a.", and line "b. Selling stocks,
bonds, etc .----------$202.50"
is to be deleted.
8.
Page 14 - Line
12
- After "SECURITY COMPANIES" add "Guard services, etc."
9.
Page 14 Line
26
- TAX PREPARATION SERVICE - Change the fee from $150.00
to $140.00.
10.
Page 15 - Line
31
- Add the word "activity".
11.
Page 16 - Line
28
- Change SECTION 7 to SECTION 5.
12.
Page 8 - Starting
with Line 2 is the revised Page 8 with the covering meta
from the Mayor
dated July 31st carrying over to the first section of Page 9
Sub -Paragraph
4, Line 2.
C/W Massaro SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
3. Proclamation - Presentation by Mayor Walter W. Falck of a Proclamation
designating the Week of August 31st to September 4th, as "Water and Pollution
Control Operators Week". (Requested by Mayor Falck)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Proclamation presented.
At this time Mayor Falck presented the Proclamation. An original Proclamation
is to be presented to a representative of Utilities by Mayor Falck.
5. Springlake II - Discussion and possible action on revised north and south
site plans. (Requested by Mayor Falck)
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to 9/23/81 City Council
Meeting for revision of site plan.
Julian Bryan, representative for the petitioner H.L.R., Inc. came forward. He
advised the Council that since last week's meeting when this item was tabled to
the September 23rd meeting, they were able to meet with C/W Massaro to discuss
their method to seek the Council's approval of their site plan. The primary thing
that they will do will be to show an additional recreation building which will be
-3-
8/4/81
/ss
of sufficient. size to serve 173 units on the north side of the lake, they
provided Council with a letter confirming same. V/M Disraelly confirmed
that there will be a new site plan showing this with Mr. Bryan. The 1,250
square foot building shown on the site plan that was submitted to Council
will be used to serve the south half. In their letter they further indicated
that they will not seek,in the north half,any building permit for the construction
of dwellings, or of that model center, until they submit an application to rezone
it to S-1. Mr. Bryan advised Council that in September or October they expect
to submit to Council a request for the transfer of some reserve units on that
tract, which would, of course, necessitate a new site plan. They might not
want to place the second recreation building in the area that they are contemplating
it now. However, at this point, they will show the use of the total 1.4 acres
so that they will have what will amount to two buildings side by side, one to
serve the north half, and one to serve the south half.
Mr. Bryan requested that Council approve the site plan presented to them subject
to a drawing of a building for the north half recognizing that he could not
obtain any permits for anything other than the remainder of these 48 homes.
He advised Council that the Planning Department has the application for the
rezoning of the south half.
Mr. Bryan presented Council with another letter confirming that they will revise
and resubmit the site plan for Springlake II North in time for the Planning
Meeting on September 2, 1981 because when the other recreation building is added,
the parking requirements on the overall site plan will change.
V/M Disraelly clarified the fact that the second recreation area Mr. Bryan
referred to is the one currently shown on Springlake II North now. Mr. Bryan
added that it is vacant parcel of land of about 7/10 of an acre where the new
recreation building will be located.
Mr. Birken, City Attorney, recommended that the Council could add a stipulation
to the agreement with the developer, and have it presented to Judge Weissing,
pertaining to the recreation facilities. Mr. Birken stated that the only thing
changed from Friday's meeting is the fact that Council has now received two letters,
which, in his opinion, have no legal meaning.
Mr. Bryan stated that on Friday they showed an unwillingness to rezone the balance
of the parcel to S-1, however, now they would agree to the rezoning prior to
issuance of any building permits for the north half.
Mr. Bryan advised Council that it is their desire to split the parcel into two
sections, and the recreation area shown will only serve the south area.
V/M Disraelly brought up the fact that Mr. Bryan says they are willing to rezone
to S-1, but when they return in September they will present a revised site plan,
and at that point will not desire the S-1 zoning.
C/W Massaro mentioned that Council might be able to approve the recreation area
for the south adding that if Mr. Bryan fails to come in with the revised site
plan showing the recreation area for the north, the approval of the southern
portion would become null and void.
Mr. Birken, City Attorney, confirmed with C/W Massaro that she is referring to
two separate site plans, since they are applying for reserve units in the north
and will have to wait for the decision at the Planning meeting which will deter-
mine the size of the recreation area required for same.
C/M Zemel asked Mr. Bryan whether they are requesting the same approval which
they came in for on Friday, and Mr. Bryan's answer was affirmative.
Mr. Birken, City Attorney, reiterated the fact that the only way he would feel
comfortable with the approval is with a stipulation regarding the north portion,
unless Mr. Bryan wants to increase the square footage shown on the southern
portion, at this time.
C/M Kravitz MOVED to table this site plan as was originally done.
C/M Zemel SECONDED the motion to table this site plan to the September meeting.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
4. Public Works Department - Bid Authorization - Discussion and possible action
to authorize the City Manager to go out to bid for a curb sweeper. (Requested
by C/M Zemel)
-4-
8/4/81
/ss
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved.
Laura Stuurmans, City Manager, stated that C/M Zemel and Ralph Thissen,
Public works Director, have witnessed the demonstration of the curb sweeper.
C/W Massaro felt that this item has been discussed for some time, and is in
order.
C/W Massaro MOVED that the City Manager be authorized to go to bid for the
curb sweeper.
C/M Zemel SECONDED the motion.
V/M Disraelly asked Mr. Thissen, whether the City has the body on which to put the
sweeper, and Mr. Thissen's reply iaas affirmative. He further stated that it will
be of sufficient size and weight to handle same.
1iLYJY - me • �
2. Ad Valorem Tax Millage - Discussion and possible action on Temp. Resolution #2020
a) Establish proposed millage rate.
b) Designate dates for first hearing to adopt tentative budget F.Y. 1981/82.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved the proposed
millage rate —& roll back rate of 4.9594
and set the first hearing for October 1,
1981 at 7:00 P.M. - Temp. Resolution
#2020 adopted. RESOLUTION NO.R _PASSED
Laura Stuurmans, City Manager, mentioned to Council that after the City
receives the Certified Valuation from Mr. Markham's office, there is a very
short period of time in which to present to him a proposed millage rate based
upon an unofficial, tentative budget. It must be completed by August llth,
at which time Mr. Markham will take the date for our first hearing along with
the millage, and advise the public as to the City's plans.
Ms. Stuurmans brought up the memo which she had just handed to Council, and
advised them that there were some last minute recalculations necessary on the
material received yesterday from Mr. Markham's office because there was a trans-
position in their figures which did affect the amount of roll back rate that the
City would have to report to him. The revenue portion of the budget has not been
reviewed, and she today submitted to Council a revised and corrected revenue sheet
which was based upon staff's reconsideration of the sources of revenue which can
be anticipated from what is termed other sources, and the potential funds that
could be carried over from this year's budget into next year.(Exhibit B & C)
Ms. Stuurmans pointed out that there is an increase in the revenue projections
from other areas to the extent that they feel they can support the administrative
proposed budget at the roll back rate. She suggested to first review the recent
revenue projections, and then address specifically what the roll back rate is, and
the effect of the evaluation.
At this time, Ms. Stuurmans read her memo to Council dated August 4, 1981, the
subject of which is "Proposed Budget Update". A copy of this memo is attached,
herewith, as "Exhibit A".
V/M Disraelly brought up the item of resurfacing the roads. It was established
that the Road & Bridge Tax Anticipated Revenue is $120,000.00. He went on to
state that he would personally like to continue the program of resurfacing. The
east side is completed, and 1 through 5, and he felt that there are other areas
in the city in need of repair, and that this problem should be anticipated. V/M
Disraelly brought up the areas of 8, 9, 10, 14, 15 & 16 where the roads are de-
teriorating.
C/W Massaro mentioned that the City now has $50,000 for road resurfacing, and she
would be interested in knowing what other costs are generated for the road pro-
gram. She went on to state that she would hate to see the taxes increased. V/M
Disraelly brought up the repair work that was done in sections 1 through 5, and
it was established that the cost for same was approximately $70,000.00.
V/M Disraelly established the fact that he does not want to see taxes raised, but
felt it was important to provide for essential items.
5_
90m
/ss
C/W Massaro asked how the additional 6% would affect the millage.
Laura Stuurmans answered by stating that it would require a 5.3040
per $1,000.00 millage levy as opposed to the roll back of 4.9594, at
which point V/M Disraelly interjected by stating that it's equivalent
to 1/3 of a mill.
Laura Stuurmans, City Manager,mentioned that at the end of the
fiscal year Council will be asked to earmark the balance of the
drainage and road resurfacing funds to carry them over to the 1982/83
budget.
C/W Massaro mentioned that this has nothing to do with this budget,
which Ms. Stuurmans confirmed. Ms. Stuurmans stated the drainage
improvement work in the west has been paid for from the drainage
improvement fund, and she didn't believe that the $100,000 that is
in this year's budget had been touched at all.
C/W Massaro questioned whether anything could be cut back so there
wouldn't be an increase in taxes.
V/M Disraelly pointed out that the Franchise Tax for the Cable T.V.,
in the Revenues, should be $22,000 and not $25,000, which is what
the contract calls for. ($22,000 guaranteed)
C/W Massaro brought up the additional men proposed for the Police
Department, to which C/M zemel said it was discussed to add 3 police
officers and 2 aides. Laura Stuurmans advised that these are not
recommended by the City Manager, and is not included in these figures.
C/M Kravitz brought up the fact that the revised police recommendation
is $2,400,000, at which point Ms. Stuurmans stated the exact amount of
$2,438.604,which C/M Kravitz noted is approximately $500,000 more than
last year.
Arthur Birken, City Attorney, reminded Council that all they are doing
now is setting a figure that will be sent to the taxpayers for their
information, and there will be two public hearings on the proposed
budget and millage. He went on to advise that at the first public
hearing they can either increase or decrease the figure put into this
resolution. Between the first and second hearing they can only de-
crease.
C/W Massaro recommended that this item be studied carefully, which
Mayor Falck agreed should be done.
Laura Stuurmans, City Manager, advised Council that hearing dates
can begin on September 29th. However, she recommended October lst,
because of the religious holidays, and the fact that the County
meeting is being held on September 30th. It was also established
that the school board meeting is being held on October 2nd. She
recommended that the second hearing be held on October 9th. Mr.
Birken, City Attorney, advised that it has to be held after 5:00 P.M.
The millage rate will have to be delivered by October loth between
8:30 and noon, which is a Saturday, continued Ms. Stuurmans. Mayor
Falck suggested that both meetings be scheduled for 7:00 P.M. Mr.
Birken stated that at the first meeting, the date could be set for
the second meeting.
Mr. Birken, City Attorney, read the Resolution into the record.
V/M Disraelly MOVED the approval of Temporary Resolution #2020
establishing the time of October lst at 7:00 P.M. in the Council
Chambers showing the proposed millage and roll back: rate of 4.9594
per $1,000.00.
C/M Kravitz SECONDED the motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
8/4/81
/ss
Mr. Jack Stelzer, a resident of Tamarac, stepped forward to bring up a few
items since he was not going to be able to attend the public hearings on the
budget in October. He discussed the budget, and made the following suggestions:
When there are public improvements to be made in the City, Council should invoke
Ordinance No. 75-23 which gives the City the power and authority to charge
individual property owners, who will benefit from these improvements, for the
cost of same.
His second suggestion was that a provision be made in the budget, at this time,
for contributions to the purchase of a new City Hall. By doing so, he continued,
the money can be kept in the bank and continue to collect the 17% or 18% interest,
and when the time comes to build a new City Hall, there may be enough money to
pay for it. When the Referendum is presented to the residents pertaining to this
building, he felt it would be a good selling point to be able to tell the people
that there is now enough surplus in the City to cover the cost of the project,
and he doubted whether there would be any opposition to same.
MAYOR FALCK ADJOURNED THE T,=ING at 11:30 A.M.
MA O
ATTEST:
� , , _,,
A.fir
This public docment was promulgated at a cost of $109.48
or $5.17 per copy, to inform the general public and public
officers and employees about recent opinions and considera-
tions by the City Council of the City of Tamarac.
-7-
APPROVEP BY
CITY COUNCIL ON �
8/4/81
/ss
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
August 4, 1981
EXHIBIT A
Item 2.Ad Valorem Tax Millage - Discussion and possible action to: a) Establish pro-
posed millage rate; b) Designate dates for first hearing to adopt tentative budget F.Y.
1981/82.
eity of A"wac
MEMO TO:
FROM
DATE
SUBJECT .
REFERENCE:
INTER - OFFICE MEMORANDUM
MAYOR WALTER FALCK AND CITY COUNCIL
LAUFA Z. STUURMANS, CITY MANAGER
AUGUST 4, 1981
PROPOSED BUDGET UPDATE
The Administration's Proposed General Funs'
Budget for the year 1981/1982 has been revised since our
original submission on July 1st and now totals $7,859,407.00,
an increase of $ 52,624.00 over our initial expenditure
projections.
Staff has also taken a hard look at the
City's potential revenue receipts and the anticipated surplus
which can be carried"forward from the year 1980/1981 to support
the new budget. Certain changes, including increases in
anticipated surplus from $900,000.00 to $1,240,000.00, and in
interest income from $ 450,000.00 are reflected in our latest
revenue projections. Our reconsideration of the revenue
sources for 1981/1982 has allowed staff to reduce the tax
funding requirement to support the Administration's proposed
1981/1982 budget to the initial $3,404,183.00 to $3,058,107.00.
This means that it is possible for the City of Tamarac to fund
its 1981/1982 budget without an increase in taxes to our
residents and business community.
Added by Laura Stuunmans; at City Council Meeting dated August 4, 1981.
" The Administrative Budget at this point is 8.54%
an increase over our 1980-81 budget, and we would be able to support
that increase with other revenue sources without increasing taxes.,,
The budget now presented to you still
excludes from Public Works Department the $100,000.00 drainage
expenditure/reserve and only provides $ 50,000.00 for
road resurfacing. Some question was raised at the Workshops
that the drainage amount should be returned to the 1981/1982
budget and that the resurfacing project should be increased by
another $85,000.00 rounded figures to step up this program next
year. These additions to the proposed budget would require an
approximate 6% increased funding from tax revenue receipts, but
involve projects of concern to the public. Should Council select
to fund these additions, a second set of summary revenue and
expenditure sheets have been prepared for your consideration
today.
MILLAGE LEVY
The Cit 's current year adjusted taxable
value is $685,142,770.00k,_Tast year's adjusted taxable value
was $484,141,195.00k'fhe 1980 millage levy was 6.4803, to
produce ad valorem revenues of $3,082,960.00 to fund the
1980/1981 budget. A rolled -back rate for 1981 of 4.9594
per thousand would yield $3,058,107.00, the amount required
to fund the City Manager's 1981/1982 budget.
To fund the budget option, which would
provide for the drainage and road resurfacing additions, a
millage levy of 5.3040, a 6.9408% increase over the roll-
back rate, would be required.
LZS/rg
8/4/81
/ss
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
August 4, 1981
EXHIBIT B
Item 2. Ad Valorem Tax Millage - Discussion and possible action to. a) Establish pro-
posed millage rate, b) Designate dates for first hearing to adopt tentative budget F.Y.
1981/82.
REVISED AND CORRECTED
CITY of TAMARAC BORXS� AUGUST
=STDMTED MEVM 0E
3,1981
MMUOMIr(1pD
yj=AL yW - 1981 -
92
1980-81 1�D
1XTUAL ISCEIPTS
ESTIMATED
ACCOUNT
Z: TMATED �'S
T'E1AiDUGH 6/30/81
w"ER
REVENUES
REVENUUES
3,092,960
2,929,299
3,058,107
311-DDO AD 'AN£M -
311-001 4W DISTRIHUR'IOt�t CN ADD :TALON- 0
19,814
21,054
311-002
�T ON TAX DISTRIBUTION 0 �_
1S0
PRIOR YF2►R PERSONAL PROPERTY
2,971,117
3,058,107
_%U-D03
DOTTAL AD VALOR RELA 3, D82 , 960
R780,000
313-100
06CAISE TAX-I�CTRIC 733,000
628,D26
0 `
35,000
313-1DO
33,000
PRMC 3ISE TAX -TELEPHONE 20,000
TMCHISE TAX CATV
28,148
25,000
29,000
313-500
313-700
FRAT1Ct3ISE TAX + SOLID HASTE 30,000
,243
1Q 964
4,400
313-900
� wSPAPER COLLECTION w
320-ODD
LICENSES 6 PERMITS-aDRG�AR 40,000
41,275
112•000
-321-200
ALAw 139,000
OCCUPATIOM7►L -LICENSES435,000
130,263
300,193
132,000
370.ODO
322-DOD
BUILDING PERMITS 23,000
12,889
23,100
324-310
AQUATIC NEED CONTROL 70,000
49,111
95,000
335-110
CIGARETTE TAX 695.000
�� SRAPM G
465.006
710,000
91900
33*5-220
335-ISO
STATE
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE 0000
9,389
108,913
- 0 -
335-170
13 000
ROMES91%= E70W770N 7,000
4,405
61000
335-410
GAS DEBATE -CITY VEHICLE210,000
103,813
120,000
338-100
COUNTY ROAD i BRIDGE TAX
33,000
33,999
37,000
336-200
COUNTY OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE
3,522
3,800
344-500
PARKING LOT ! CITY 24,000
7,920
14.000
2,000
347-211
347-210
SUMER RECREATION
PARKS i RECREATION PROG.ACT•F=S 30
747 7
110,000
349-100
INTERIM SERVICE FEES ,00
135,000
,7
964
162,372
135,000
349-200
ENGINEERING FEES(UNRFS)
349-400
LOT CLEARXNG 10,000
' 90,DDD
`
87,488
85,n00
91000
3SD-000
351-000
i'II=
P.D.GENERAL ` 0 `
7,R31
- 0
- 0
351-200
COURT COST FEES 3,D00
25,000
58,487
50,000
360-000
361-100
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
INTEREST INCOMi GENERAL ESCROW 50,000
142,964
- 0
- 0
361-•110
INTEREST INCH CYMER 190,000
186,647
f p -
950,000
361-000
INTEREST INCOME ` 0 `
` 0 `
11.405
- 0 -
38D-00D
RECEIPTS TRANSFERRED IN PSC
399-000
RECEIPTS TRANSFERRED IN IN
- 0 !
130,000
LIEU OF TAXES /UTILITY WEST 130,000
399-100 RECEIPTS TRANSFERRED IN IN LIEU
_ - 0 -
6,000
OF TAXES UTILITY EAST 6,000
399-20D RECEIPTS TRANSFERRED IN DATA
« 0 _
30,000
PROCESSING UTILITY NEST O "
399-300 RECEIPTS TRANSFERRED IN 'DATA
! 0 f
2,100
PROCESSING UTILITY EAST ` 0 `
399-400 HECEIPTS TRANSFERRED IN VEHICLE
31,000
MAINTENANCE UTILITY HEST - 0 "
t
_ 0 ^
399_500
RECEIPTS TRANSFERRED IN ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES PROVIDED TO UTILITY
25,000
WEST.
APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE 900,000
- 0 -
1 2Q0 00
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES 7,240,960
5,691,782
7,859,407
8/4/81
/ss
SPECrAL COUNCIL, MEETING
August 4, 1981
EXHIBIT C
Item 2. Ad Valorem Tax Millage - Discussion and possible action to: a) Establish pro-
posed millage rate; b) Designate dates for first hearing to adopt tentative budget F.Y.
1981/82.
�J
N
a
d
w
A �I 0 Mai Q F�+1 Mi N hnl
�� to
-1 f'] R 8 to
SV 9 8 z w zH:3 wS��
S,C~rC Ln
1ya��y x M nNri,
l*f W
H f S
F+ F+ W 0� � W M I► F+ 1+ N
wa�rl��w�S
� •aS�o � u� wr oNo
D OOOSS1mApOSSC�SpSOOpOpOO
• wr� # WO�JMv0.0 6gw8
•w8�a0 V1 wr ONO ♦�n►+S
`r rQQ .r rQ r . . . . r r ■ . r .
o7510 00aSS�S�S0 Casco
rn
F+NOD w OJ wN &wt
r 1 C r~l O N w l N .w w Q• tJ1 a• S
w r ■ C ..�r . ■ r . N. ■■
SS �w�o mo+a� �w'NW6,00-
o Boa 00Soao•#+m°'wao
N
Ja to OD w Q J a, Z g
J 1� N
0 ozo Y1 1 NM Wa��h+� W
I� r 1JO F-' ayy►�1a��1O W pNW Nm&J j rw�0
0 $TO U1 OQ 1 SOSCO"a tw,D
-10-
8/4/81
r
W"A 0NNW �r
a1wNo wNa, ZJ
wr�rwe%"AwatAb
owS$oSo$o75
• r
w.1�0NNN �'
1,f1W W C7NNQ �J
r �+ ND r+ w �► v` ur �QQ►
■,1�01J�O�JwN� mS
04A0 Soso
m�mlwwmO� �
yl � ■.1 1J1 LJ� � J tJ1 �
0p0ab0 mSca.m
N
Q� Cd
N1l�a�Q•�
r
maa+
mwva►+O
Si
d & w
co
N