HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-09-23 - City Commission Special Budget Meeting Minutesof T4�
10RtpP
P,O. BOX 25010
TAMARAC. FLORIDA 33320
Cl
-w
September 16, 1986
NOTICE OF BUDGET PUBLIC HEARINGS
FISCAL YEAR 1986/87
Please be advised that Public Hearings will be held by the City Council
on Tuesday, September 23, 1986, at 6:00 P.M. at the City of Tamarac
Satellite Recreation Building, 7501 University Drive, Tamarac, Florida,
on the following items:
1. Final Millage Rate - Temp. Reso. #4250 - To adopt
an aggregate proposed millage rate for FY 1986/87
2. Final General Fund Budget - Temp. Ord. #1285 - To
establish the General Fund Budget for FY 1986/87.
Second Reading. (First Reading was held 9/8/86).
3. Tamarac Utilities West - Temp. Ord. #1286 - To
adopt the Annual Tamarac Utilities West Fund Budget
for FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First Reading was
held 9/8/86).
4. Tamsjrag !Jtilities Esqst - T .d. 1287 - To
adopt the Annual Utility East Fund Budget for
FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First Reading was
held 9/8/86).
5. ,$p gial Funds - Tgmp. Qrd-.--.11288 - To adopt the
General Capital Construction Fund - City Hall, Police
Education Fund, Building Education Fund, GOB 1975
Sinking Fund, GOB 1984 Sinking Fund, City Hall
Renovation Fund, Drainage Improvement Fund, Parks
and Recreation Fund, Capital Construction Drainage
Fund, Sidewalk Project Fund, Street Resurfacing
Phase II Fund, Capital Reserve Fund, Central Data
Processing Services Fund, Central Purchasing/Stores
Fund, Fleet Maintenance Fund, Self Insurance
Collision Fund and First Aid Claims Fund Budgets
for FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First Reading
was held on 9/8/86).
The public is invited to attend.
Marilyiq Ber holf, CMC
City Clerk
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the city
Council with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or
hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings and for such
purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
'c�ORIDP
P.O BOX 25010
TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33320
September 16, 1986
RECORD F COUNCIL DISCUSSIONS AND ACTIONS
NOTICE OF BUDGET PUBLIC HEARINGS
FISCAL YEAR 1986/87
Please be advised that Public Hearings will be held by the City Council
on Tuesday, September 23, 1986, at 6:00 P.M. at the City of Tamarac
Satellite Recreation Building, 7501 University Drive, Tamarac, Florida,
on the following items:
1. Final Mill.agg Rats - Temp.__ResQ. 14250 - To adopt
an aggregate proposed millage rate for FY 1986/87.
FINAL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO. R-86-316 PASSED.
APPROVED as amended with a millage rate of 3.25 and a percentage
increase in property taxes for FY 86/87 of 19.0%. Public hearing was
held.
2. Final General Fund Budget - Temp. Ord. #1285 - To
establish the General Fund Budget for FY 1986/87.
Second Reading. (First Reading was held 9/8/86).
FINAL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 0-86-52 PASSED.
APPROVED on second and final reading with an annual General Fund
Budget of $11,793,260.00. Public hearing was held.
3. Tamarac Utilities West - TemP.-Qrd. #1286 - To
adopt the Annual Tamarac Utilities West Fund Budget
for FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First Reading was
held 9/8/86).
FINAL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 0-86-53 PASSED.
APPROVED on second and final reading. Public hearing was held.
4. Tamarac -Utilities East - Temp. _0 d. #1287 - To
adopt the Annual Utility East Fund Budget for
FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First Reading was
held 9/8/86) .
FINAL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 0-86-54 PASSED.
APPROVED on second and final reading. Public hearing was held.
5. Special Funds - Temp. Ord. #1288 - To adopt the
General Capital Construction Fund - City Hall, Police
Education Fund, Building Education Fund, GOB 1975
Sinking Fund, GOB 1984 Sinking Fund, City Hall
Renovation Fund, Drainage Improvement Fund, Parks
and Recreation Fund, Capital Construction Drainage
Fund, Sidewalk Project Fund, Street Resurfacing
Phase II Fund, Capital Reserve Fund, Central Data
Processing Services Fund, Central Purchasing/Stores
Fund, Fleet Maintenance Fund, Self Insurance
Collision Fund and First Aid Claims Fund Budgets
for FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First Reading
was held on 9/8/86).
5. Special Funds - Temp. d. #1288 - Cont'd.
FINAL ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 0-86-55 PASSED.
APPROVED on second and final reading. Public hearing was held.
The public is invited to attend.
Marily Bertholf, CMC
City Clerk
Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the city
Council with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or
hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings and for such
purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
1
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING
SPECIAL MEETING
September 23, 1986
Tape 1 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Hart called the Special Meeting/Public Hearing
to order at 6:00 P.M. on Tuesday, September 23, 1986 at the Tamarac
Satellite Recreation Building.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT:
ALSO PRESENT:
Mayor Bernard Hart
Councilman Sydney M. Stein
Councilman Arthur H. Gottesman
Vice Mayor Jack Stelzer
Councilwoman Helen Massaro
John P. Kelly, City Manager
Alan F. Ruf, Consulting City Attorney
Carol E. Barbuto, Assistant City Clerk
Patricia Marcurio, Secretary
1. Final Millage Rate - Temp. Reso. #4284 - To adopt an aggregate
proposed millage rate for FY 1986/87.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
APPROVED as amended with a
millage rate of 3.25 and a
percentage increase in property
taxes for FY 86/87 of 19.0%.
Public hearing was held.
RESOLUTION NO. R-86-316 PASSED.
Mayor Hart said the first Public Hearing on the budget was held on
Monday, 9/8/86, with a Resolution which called for a millage rate
of $4.58 per $1,000 of assessed value. He said after much
discussion by the public and Council, reduction of the millage rate
was considered to $3.35 with a 6% utility tax.
Mayor Hart said after the Motion was approved to change this
millage to $3.35, someone asked if the utility tax only referred to
electric and the answer was that telephone service was included as
well. He said since that time, he studied the dictionary and State
Statute definition of "utility tax" and learned that it could
include a tax on all utilities.
Mayor Hart said in Broward County only 6 of the 26 cities reporting
to the Broward League of Cities, including Tamarac, have not had a
utility tax. He said most have 10% on all utilities. He said a
Council Workshop meeting was held last week during which a sugges-
tion by C/W Massaro was adopted that the fairest way of collecting
the money necessary to operate the City properly was to charge
residents exactly what the City was paying for garbage removal.
Mayor Hart said they checked 26 cities to determine if they had a
garbage removal fee that was billed separately to the people of the
City. He said of these 26 cities, 5 had the garbage removal fee in
their ad valorem tax, as Tamarac has done for many years. He said
21 cities have charged separately for a garbage removal fee and
most have them directly on the utility bill as a separate line
item.
Mayor Hart said some people desired to raise
what was originally presented to the public,
have no tax on utilities or garbage removal
the ad valorem tax to
that is, $4.58, and
fee.
1
9/23/86
/pm
Mayor Hart said there is a State Statute which stipulates that
between the time of the first and second budget hearings, the City
may not raise the millage rate. He said the interim fee
tentatively chosen was $3.35 per $1,000 of assessed value.
Mayor Hart noted that the public hearing will be held and Council
will then take action because this is mandatory before 10/1/86.
V/M Stelzer, Liaison to Budget and Finance, said he would like to
correct the agenda to read Tp p,�_Eeso. #4284 instead of Temp.
Resp. #4250, as noted on the agenda.
V/M Stelzer said the budget has increased as follows:
General Budget - 1979 - $ 4,500,000.00
1986 - $11,700,000.00
Police Department - 1979 -- $ 1,300,000.00
1986 - $ 3,900,000.00
Fire Department - 1979 - $ 431,000.00
1986 - $ 1,400,000.00
V/M Stelzer said the Police and Fire Department budgets are
approximately 47% of the City's total budget with an increase this
year of $1,300,000.00, of which $840,000.00 is due to salary
increases and benefits. He said the employee salaries are over 70%
of the entire budget since 95% of the employees are unionized.
V/M Stelzer said in all prior years expenses were estimated by
Department Heads and reviewed by the City Manager with the Finance
Director and the City Manager determining what they feel the income
for the City will be.
V/M Stelzer noted the following:
Year Surplus &Mount -.Over and Abov Ex uses
1979 --
$1,500,000.00
1980 -
$ 570,000.00
1981 -
$1,000,000.00 plus
1982 --
$ 215,000.00
1983 -
$ 188,000.00
V/M Stelzer said the City accumulated a tremendous surplus so that
in 1983 there was a 2.6 million dollar surplus and the auditors
complained that this was too large. He said a Charter Amendment
was approved by the people to keep no more than 10% of a current
year's budget as a surplus. He said to comply with this, the
Finance Department reduced the rates on the ad valorem. He said in
1984 the rate was $2.25 and $938,000.00 was spent of the surplus.
V/M Stelzer said the State mandated that the City could not raise
ad valorem taxes more than 10% in any one year so that for 1985 the
tax rate became $2.48 and $1,700,000.00 of the surplus had to be
used leaving a $14,000.00 negative balance at the end of 1985. He
said every other City in the area has had the same problem.
V/M Stelzer said the total budget this year is $11,700,000.00 and
4.2 million dollars is needed to balance the budget. He said that
amount would have to come either from ad valorem taxes or by any
other method that can be devised. He said it was suggested at the
last Budget meeting that a 6% utility tax would be added and the
people present that night agreed with this solution.
V/M Stelzer said it was determined later that the utility tax would
be very inequitable since people with families using a great deal
of electricity would have to pay a tremendous amount. He said on
the other hand, when the garbage removal fee was in the ad valorem
taxes, the people with homes that were assessed low would pay about
$58.00 to $75.00 per year as equivalent for garbage removal while
the people with homes assessed at $300,000.00 would have to pay
$402.00 for garbage removal.
1
2 r
9/23/86
/pm
V/M Stelzer said at the Budget Workshop it was determined that the
City would add $6.37 to the utility bill for garbage removal for
the private home resident and $3.06 for garbage removal for condo-
minium residents. He said this is exactly what Waste Management is
charging the City and they will pass this charge to the resident if
this is passed.
Mayor Hart opened the Public Hearing.
Jack Bizar, 7307 NW 65 St., asked what was done to avoid a raise in
taxes. Mayor Hart said since the election in March, there have
been raises of the tipping fees, a 12 million dollar bond issue for
the new utility system and today they are asking the residents for
constructive input to this problem.
Bill Pisner, Vice President of the Civic Association at Faircrest
14, said last year was the first year that garbage was paid separ-
ately and Mayor Hart said there was a $3.00 charge put on at that
time.
C/M Stein said last year it was decided to pass on 50% of the
actual cost of the City for garbage removal. He said the Council
was willing to have a utility tax instead of a garbage collection
fee but they are trying to find the best way for all concerned.
He said if the people present tonight feel they would rather have a
6% utility tax, then Council will go along with their wishes.
David Silvergleid, resident, said he attended the Budget Workshop
and he noted that if the utilities were taxed it would be entirely
inequitable and would establish a precedent. He said this might
open the door for further taxes on water, sewer and other services
as well. He said he agrees with the additional charge for garbage
collection and he commended Council's agreement on this issue.
Irving Polk, resident of Kings Point, said he lived in Davie
previously where they paid taxes on the telephone and electricity;
however, because he lived in a condominium area, the township could
not collect on the garbage removal because there was private
service. He questioned whether it was legal for the City to charge
for condominium pickup. Mayor Hart said Davie has a 9% tax on
utilities plus a franchise of garbage to a collector.
C/W Massaro asked Mr. Polk what is meant by "private" and
Mr. Polk said the Association paid directly to the company.
Mayor Hart said the garbage collection fees are paid by the City to
Waste Management at $3.06 per condominium unit.
C/M Gottesman noted that last year, according to the figures he
had, a Davie resident paid $96.40 for the year for garbage
collection and this amount will be higher this year because there
was a tipping charge increase. He said Tamarac is only asking for
approximately $37.00 per year which is 1/3 of what was paid in
Davie.
Karen Craig, resident of Heathgate/Sunflower, said she is in favor
of the garbage collection fee rather than a utility tax but she
questioned the difference between the condominium charge and the
charge for single family homeowners. C/W Massaro said condominiums
have dumpsters for group collection, whereas, single family homes
require individual collection.
Irving Lopatey, 9150 Lime Bay Blvd., President of the Tamarac's
Presidents Council, said they sent Council a letter indicating
their wishes with regard to the ad valorem tax and the utility tax.
He said they indicated that they did not want a utility tax and
would prefer an increase in the ad valorem.
3
9/23/86
/pm
Tape 2
Mr. Lopatey said after the letter was delivered, they learned that
the ad valorem could not be raised. He said he attended the
Workshop meeting and he felt a utility tax would be unfair.
Milt Siegel, President of the Isles of Tamarac, asked if the final
figure of the ad valorem is $3.35 and V/M Stelzer said no, that is
a proposal.
Aaron Heller, 5715 NW 86 Ave., said he was opposed to a user tax on
telephone and electricity and he felt the City should have open
bids for franchises for garbage collection.
Don Perlman, resident of Sunflower/Heathgate, asked what the true
figure for ad valorem taxes is and V/M Stelzer said there is now a
projection of a $3.35 rate plus garbage removal fees. Mr. Perlman
asked how much revenue will be generated by this figure and
Mr. Etheredge said this should generate approximately
$3,185,000.00. He asked if the reappraisals of all the homes was
taken into consideration when this rate was determined and Mayor
Hart said the assessed values are submitted to the City by the
County Assessor.
Arthur Hill, President of the Heathgate/Sunflower Homeowners
Association, said a utility tax could have a rate that is out of
control.
Mr. Hill said previously residents opposed the imposition of a
garbage fee because there was an advantage to the individual on
income tax by having that fee incorporated in the ad valorem tax.
Faye Goodman, 9200 Lime Bay Blvd., said the handout shows Police
and Fire budgets together and she asked if this was proper.
V/M Stelzer said the expenses have been grouped in categories and
the Police budget is $3,945,000.00 and the Fire budget is
$10575,000.00. Mrs. Goodman asked if the reflected figure for
Police has anything to do with the BSO contract and Mayor Hart said
no.
Bernie Shiff, resident of Springlake, said it seems that a 6%
utility tax would be such a greater amount of income and she
questioned if the garbage collection fees will cover the amounts
needed. V/M Stelzer said the City plans on spending $1,300,000.00
for garbage removal for next year and the Finance Director has
determined that passing the exact amount that the City is charged
on to the residents, will make up the difference.
Sam Vasin, resident of Section 14, asked why the $3.00 garbage fee
that was paid last year is not listed on the handout and
Mr. Etheredge said it shows in the General Fund as income. He
questioned whether the millage can be raised or not and
V/M Stelzer said the old law was repealed last year and cities are
now allowed to raise the taxes with a ceiling of 10 mils. He said
in the past cities were only allowed to raise it 10% over the prior
year.
Mr. Vasin asked why there was a surplus in past years that was
invested in ESM and he noted that the taxes were held steady at
that time. Mayor Hart quoted the following figures:
Year Millage_ Rate
1979 -- $6.03
1980 - $5.69
1981 - $6.48
Sherman Merle, President of the Springlake Homeowners Association,
asked why the ad valorem is "proposed" at 3.35 and C/M Stein said
it is considered a proposed rate until it is officially approved by
Council. He said the amount cannot be raised but could be reduced.
4
9/23/86
/pm
1
Mr. Merle said an increase from $3.00 to $6.37 for garbage collec-
tion is a 112% increment. V/M Stelzer said last year the City's
contract with Waste Management was for $1,066,000.00 and this year
the amount is $1,300,000.00. He said the tipping charge is what
Waste Management pays when they dump the refuse into a dump and
that has been increased. He said last year the residents were only
charged half of what the City had to pay. He said this year
additional revenue is needed because the ad valorem taxes are down
and they are only charging what it actually costs the City.
C/M Stein said the total budget is $11,300,000.00 and the total
amount of ad valorem is $4,000,000.00. He said the increase is
caused because the State does not give any additional assistance;
therefore, the money must come from the residents. Mr. Merle said
he would rather have everything included in an ad valorem tax.
Mayor Hart said he agrees that it should all be in the ad valorem
tax and if the original proposal of 4.58 millage was adopted, there
would have been no discussion concerning a garbage collection fee
or a utility tax. He said at the last meeting the people approved
a millage rate of 3.35 plus a 6% utility tax. He said the Council
could now drop the utility tax and devise another way to account
for the money needed. He said according to State Law, the City
cannot raise the 3.35 rate at all.
Carolyn Mascolo, resident of Sunflower/Heathgate, said she felt the
City should stay strictly with an ad valorem tax. She urged
Council to consider inviting businesses into the City to avoid
higher taxes.
Mayor Hart closed the Public Hearing with no further response.
C/M Stein said there cannot be a garbage contract within this City
without a franchise paying a franchise fee. He said he agreed with
Mrs. Mascolo and he noted that Council is working to invite
businesses into the City for that purpose. He said the ultimate
way out is to broaden the tax base and he noted that there is a
Public Hearing tomorrow night regarding Land Section 7 and, if the
Resolution is passed, the first developer in there has plans for a
45-acre mall and motel unit. He said this is the first step to
broaden the tax base.
C/M Stein said approximately 3 years ago, the residents approved a
20 million dollar bond issue, which is being floated and, this
year, the City must pay the interest on this. He said there is 2
million dollars in debt service in this budget plus the old debt
service, which has not been paid as yet. He said most of the money
invested with ESM was developers money put aside for water, sewer
and development. He said the City is getting a new water plant and
sewer system and the residents must pay for this.
C/M Gottesman said he spoke with the Finance Director this after-
noon and was told that the ad valorem could be reduced to $3.25 and
he questioned why discussions tonight concern $3.35. Mayor Hart
said Council has not adopted any millage rate as yet and Temp•
Reso. #4284 calls for $3.35; however, after Council comments and
the Attorney reads the Resolution, this can be amended if desired.
C/W Massaro said the mall that C/M Stein refers to has been planned
for two years at an estimated cost of 45 million dollars. She said
4 years ago, when this was first discussed, the residents were very
much opposed and wanted a "bedroom community". She said last year
the residents did not oppose that particular mall and she noted
that this can be realized if people do not protest. She urged
people to attend the various Land Use Plan meetings so that they
can give constructive input.
C/M Gottesman said the budget is $11,800,000.00 and not
$11,300,000.00 as previously stated and C/M Stein accepted the
correction.
5
9/23/86
/pm
V/M Stelzer said Temp. Reso. #4284 follows Resolution 86-284, which
was approved two weeks ago, approved a millage rate of $3.35 with a
6% utility tax. He said the Finance Director has recomputed the
figures and it is possible that a millage rate of $3.25 can be
adopted, reducing the millage rate by $.11. He said every penny
reduced in the millage rate reduces the City's income by $9,000.00;
therefore, if a $3.25 rate is adopted, the income will be reduced
by $100,000.00.
V/M Stelzer said he would like to see $100,000.00 built up for next
year by keeping the millage at $3.35.
Consulting City Attorney Ruf read Temp. _Reso. #4284 entirely into
the record.
C/W Massaro requested an Amendment to that Resolution and Mayor
Hart said there must first be a Motion to adopt the Resolution and
then an Amendment can be made.
C/M Stein MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Reso. #4284 with a millage rate
of $3.35, SECONDED by V/M Stelzer.
C/W Massaro said in as much as the Finance Director has indicated
that a millage rate of $3.25 is adequate to cover the budget, she
MOVED to AMEND that figure to $3.25, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
C/M Gottesman noted that the percentage is now 19% instead of 22%
as previously noted.
Mayor Hart asked the Finance Director to verify that figure and
Mr. Etheredge did so. C/M Stein said he would endorse the reduc-
tion in order to show the residents that Council is making an
effort to control costs.
Mayor Hart called for a Roll Call on the Amendment from $3.35 mills
to $3.25 mills.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
Consulting City Attorney Ruf read Temp. Reso. #4284 entirely with
the new millage of $3.25 and the new percentage of 19%.
Mayor Hart called for a Roll Call on the MOTION for APPROVAL of
Temp. Reso. #4284.
VOTE:
ALL VQTED AYE
2. Final Gengral Fund Budget - Temp. Qrd. #1285 - To establish the
General Fund Budget for FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First
reading and public hearing was held 9/8/86).
SYNOPSIS -OF ACTION:
APPROVED on second and
final reading with an
Annual General Fund budget
of $11,793,260.00. Public
Hearing was held.
ORDINANCE NO. 0-86--52 PASSED.
Mr. Ruf read TeMp. Qgd. 11285 by title.
Mayor Hart opened and closed the public hearing with no response.
6
�Pm 3/86
1-1
1
1
1
*
* V/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Ord. #12U with a Final General
* Fund Budget in the amount of $11,793,260.00, SECONDED by C/W
* Massaro.
V TE:
C/W Massaro Aye
V/M Stelzer Aye
C/M Gottesman Absent
C/M Stein Absent
Mayor Hart Aye
Tape 3
3. Tamarac Utilities West - Temp. Ord. #1286 - To adopt the Annual
Tamarac Utilities West Fund Budget for FY 1986/87. Second
Reading. (First reading and public hearing was held 9/8/86).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
APPROVED on second and final
reading. Public hearing was
held.
ORDINANCE NO. 0-86-53 PASSED.
Mr. Ruf read Temp. Ord. #12.86 by title.
Mayor Hart opened and closed the public hearing with no response.
*
* V/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Ord. J#1.286 on second and final
* reading, SECONDED by C/M Gottesman.
-_ -VOTE :
C/W Massaro
Aye
V/M Stelzer
Aye
C/M Gottesman
Aye
C/M Stein
Absent
Mayor Hart
Aye
4. Tamarac Utilities East - Tem d. #1287 - To adopt the Annual
Utility East Fund Budget for FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First
reading and public hearing was held 9/8/86).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: ORDINANCE NO. 0-86-54 PASSED.
APPROVED on second and
final reading. Public
hearing was held.
Mr. Ruf read Temp. Qrd. #1287 by title.
Mayor Hart opened the public hearing. A member of the public asked
if the amount of interest on the bond issue was not computed as a
fixed anticipated expense when the bond was first issued and
C/W Massaro said there is no bond issue for Tamarac Utilities East
but there is one for Tamarac Utilities West.
Mayor Hart closed the public hearing with no further response.
*
* C/M Gottesman MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Ord,#1287 on second and
* final reading, SECONDED by C/W Massaro.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED -AYE
5. Spgcigl Funds - Temp._OXd 11288 - To adopt the General Capital
Construction Fund - City Hall, Police Education Fund, Building
Education Fund, GOB 1975 Sinking Fund, GOB 1984 Sinking Fund,
City Hall Renovation Fund, Drainage Improvement Fund, Parks
and Recreation Fund, Capital Construction Drainage Fund,
Sidewalk Project Fund, Street Resurfacing Phase II Fund,
Capital Reserve Fund, Central Data Processing Services Fund,
Central Purchasing/Stores Fund, Fleet Maintenance Fund, Self
Insurance Collision Fund and First Aid Claims Fund Budgets for
FY 1986/87. Second Reading. (First Reading and public
hearing was held on 9/8/86).
7
9/23/86
/pm
5. Special Funds - Cont'd.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION:
APPROVED on second and
final reading. Public
hearing was held.
ORDINANCE NO. 0-86-55 PASSED.
Mr. Ruf read Temp. Qrd. #1288 by title.
Mayor Hart opened and closed the public hearing with no response.
V/M Stelzer MOVED APPROVAL of Temp. Ord. #1288 on second and final
reading, SECONDED by C/M Stein.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
Mayor Hart adjourned the meeting at 7:35 P.M.
Z/4'
rnard Har
MAYOR
AT ST:
CITE Y LERK
This public document was promulgated at a cost of $142.10 or
$3.94 per copy to inform the general public and public officers
and employees about recent opinions and considerations by the City
Council of the City of Tamarac.
U1'TY OF TAMARAC
!!=ETiNGOF -�`�' g(o
City Clerk
1
it
1
M.
9/23/86
/Pm