HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-07-31 - City Commission Reconvened Regular Meeting Minutesei'iC 1\10R-9siWR':z"i'i 383H AVENUE W fA[VIA F3AC, FEAR➢isA 3:332"1
x TELEPHONE (305) 722-5000
July 27, 1981
NOTICE OF RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
There will be a reconvened regular meeting of the City Council on Friday,
July 31, 1981, at 10:00 A.M., in the Council Chambers at City Hall. To
be discussed are the following items from the July 24 reconvened meeting:
36. Enforcement of Zoning Regulations - Temp. Ord. #886 -
Discussion and possible action to designate the official
authorized to enforce the zoning regulations within
Chapter 28 of the City Code. Second Reading. (tabled
from 7/8/81)
39. Site Plan and Development Review Regulations - Temp._Ord.
#878 -- Discussion and possible action to amend Article II of
Chapter 7 of the Code to provide procedures for the develop-
ment of and improvements to real property in the City. First
Reading.
48. Springlake II - Revised Site Plan - Discussion and possible
action on a revised site plan for the Recreation area.
84. Beautification Committee - Temp. Reso. #2019 - Discussion and
possible action to appoint members to this Committee.
Council may consider such other business as may come before it.
Carol A. Evans
Assistant City Clerk
Pursuant to Chapter 80-105 of Florida Law, Senate Bill No. 368;
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City
Council with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or
hearing, he will need a record the proceedings and for such
purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record includes
the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
(Reconvened from 7/22/81, 7/24/81 and. 7/27/81)
July 31, 1981
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Falck called the Reconvened City Council Meeting
to order on Friday, July 31, 1981, at 10:00 A.M.
ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Walter W. Falck
Vice Mayor Irving M. Disraelly
Councilwoman Helen Massaro
Councilman Irving Zemel
Councilman Philip Kravitz
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Arthur M. Birken
City Manager Laura Z. Stuurmans
85. Mainlands 16 - Revised Site Plan - Discussion and Possible Action
regarding request to Provide a Sun Shelter.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
(See Page 6
Vice Mayor. Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT, an Item relating
to Mainlands 16 Revised Site Plan. Councilman Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
86. Tamarac Utilities West - Purchase of Capital Equipment. Discussion
and Possible Action concerning three requisitions for Tamarac
Utilities West, Items a), b) and c).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
See Pages _,&
VOTE:
Vice Mayor. Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT, Tamarac Utilities
West, Item a) Requisition for Bench Turbidity Meter and one Salinity
Meter; Item b) Requisition for a 10'x 16' Aluminum Shed; and Item c)
a Portable Insect Fogger and insecticide. Councilman Zemel SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
87. Tamarac Utilities West - Emergency Repair. Discussion and
Possible Action concerning emergency action taken by City Manager
for the repair of one Hoffman Air Blower, in the amount of $5084.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION
(See Page 6 )
AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT emergency repair
for an Air Blower for Tamarac Uti ities West. Councilman Zemel
SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE.
88. Lanza Construction Company - 1980 Storm Drainage Augmentation.
Discussion and Possible Action concerning approval of payment
in the amount of $16,229.70 to Lanzo Construction Company.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT
(See Page
Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT Discussion and
Possible Action concerning payment to Lanzo Construction Company
in the amount of $16,229.70 for storm drainage augmentation on
McNab and 88th Avenue. This has been requested by the City Engineer
and approved by the City Manager. Councilwoman Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE
ALL VOTED AYE.
on
7/31/81
/lc
89. Tamarac Gardens - Model Sales Facility - Discussion
Action concerning approval of --extension of Building
a period of six months for the first building.
and Possible
Permit for
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDZZED BY CONSENT
See Page
Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT discussion and
possible Action concerning Tamarac Gardens Model Sales Facility
request for extension of Building Permit for six months. Councilwoman
Massaro SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE
Vice Mayor Disraelly indicated he had a request for the City Manager
to go to bid for six vehicles for the building department. Six vehicles
had been authorized, but because of the time element it was suggested
they not be purchased at that time�.__but _to _Mwait and_ purchase the 1981's
as soon as the 1982's come out. The Vice ayor said it was the feeling
of the Purchasing Agent that they could be purchased cheaper by bid
than to use a State Contract for a 1981 vehicle.
Councilwoman Massaro questioned the use of air conditioners in those
cars, noting that the Building Inspectors are supposed to be on the
job making inspections. She suggested the matter be held until
September to give the City Manager an opportunity to look into the
matter before advertising.
Councilman Zemel commented that he had been wondering why they have
not been looking forward to the sales at the Post Office of the Jeeps
which have been very successful units.
Councilwoman Massaro suggested waiting until September to enable the
City Manager to research the matter. The City Manager agreed to look
into the matter.
89. Tamarac Gardens - Model Sales Facility - Discussion and Possible
Action concerning approval of ---extension of Building Permit for
a period of six months for the first building.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Extension Granted for
six months from date of expiration.
Councilwoman Massaro MOVED that the Building Permit be extended
for another six months for the first building for Tamarac Gardens
from the date of expiration. Vice Mayor Disraelly SECONDED.
1 111000
ALL VOTED AYE
36. Enforcement of Zoning Regulations -- Tem . Ord. #886. Discussion
and Possible Action to designate the official authorized to
enforce the zoning regulations within Chapter 28 of the City Code.
Second Reading. (tabled from 7/8/81).
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled until
Second Meeting in September.
The City Attorney said the Public Hearing has been held, and the Mayor
had read the Title on the second reading, so Council can take what-
ever action they wish.
Councilwoman Massaro stated that they have been working on Temp. Ord.
#878, and she felt that the provision in #878, when finalized, is the
same final action that should be in Temp.#886. Therefore, until #878
is approved, she MOVED Temp.�Ord#886 be TABLED until the second Meeting
in September when they take action on Temp. #878. Councilman Zemel
SECONDED.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE,
39. Site Plan and Development Review Regulations - Temp. Ord. #878
Discussion and possible action to amend Article II ot Chapter 7
of the Code to provide procedures for the development of and
improvements to real property in the City. First Reading.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to be sent to Planning
Commission Tor input, to come back to Council
for action on September 23.
-2-
7/31/81 /lc
The City Attorney read the Title of the Ordinance,- He explained
during the week there had been meetings on Staff level and with
Council, considering the Ordinance. He commented there have been
no significant modifications to the content, there is one crane.
There have been many changes to the format. The one area where
there is supposed to be a major change pertains to Preliminary
Site Plan approval. The recommendation which he would appreciate
Council discussing is for Preliminary Site Plan to be approved by
Staff and not by the Planning Commission; and then for the Final
Site Plan to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and Staff, and
finally the Council. The City Attorney pointed out that would be
a significant time -saving factor. He indicated there was a Workshop
in 1978 on the subject and it would be a reasonable way to solve the
problem. The Planning Commission would still get to look at and
review the Site Plans. or
City Attorney Birken recommended to the Council that the Ordinance
be redrafted and referred back to the Planning Commission for them
to consider in September with instructions that they take action
on the matter and then it be brought back to Council at their
September Meeting. He pointed out the Land Use Plan element does
require that detailed regulations be prepared, however they will
only be losing an additional two weeks in the approval process.
He said he did not think it would be fair to Council to go through
the many changes without their having time to review them and think
about them.
Councilwoman Massaro said she thinks having the Preliminary Plans
go to Staff only is a good move, and will not preclude any developer
from coming to Planning Commission with a Concept Plan.
The City Attorney stated that Vice Mayor Disraelly had expressed
concern about Council not knowing when a Site Plan is in-house for
review until it goes before the Planning Commission, and he suggested
to remedy the situation that the Ordinance contain language instructing
Staff to notify Council within 48 hours of submission of the Site Plan
as to what has been requested so that Council, if interested, could
contact the appropriate Staff people to work with them as far as
development is concerned, or to make recommendations. Councilwoman
Massaro indicated she thought that was a good suggestion.
Vice Mayor Disraelly commented that he felt individual members of
Council do not know about many of the projects that come into the
City and unfortunately Council does not know, iintil.thei.y:appear
on the Planning Commission Agenda. He said if there is only a Final
Site Plan they would have it on the first Wednesday of the month and
Council would not know about that until the Agenda was printed the
weekend prior to that. The Vice Mayor pointed out it is possible,
and has happened, at the Meeting on the first Wednesday the Planning
Commission approves a Plan and at the Pre -agenda Meeting on Thursday
it is put on the Agenda. Council does not get the packet until
Friday afternoon and they have a week -end to review it and there
may be a half a dozen Site Plans on the Agenda. Vice Mayor Disraelly
indicated if there is a preliminary review they have time to read
and digest the referencesas to the Planning Commission's feeling.
The Vice Mayor indicated the Planning Commission has been doing a good
job and they point out a number of things they feel should be done in
addition to the Staff recommendations, with regard to the Preliminary
Site Plan. In the meantime, Council has an opportunity to read what
has happened.
Vice Mayor Disraelly stated that, at least until he has time to review
it, he would not be in favor of having a single reading for the Planning
Commission and then a week later having Council act on it.
Councilman Zemel stated he would have no objection to the Preliminary
Site Plan being reviewed by Staff in lieu of going through the normal
procedure of going through the Planning Commission, however he would
insist that when Preliminary Site Plans are submitted to the City
that information and copies of these Preliminary Plans be passed to
every Council member.
Mayor Falck inquired if there was objection to the proposal that
Temp. #878 be redrafted and submitted to the Planning Commission
for review and action, and then come to the Council for review and
action. Vice Mayor Disraelly noted that he would prefer that it
not come before Council until the September 23rd Meeting. As far
as the review is concerned, he stated he would like to hear
-3-
7/11 /R1 /1,
the input of the Planning Commission with regard to the Preliminary
and Final. versus Final only.
The City Attorney commented tb.e neriod set forth by the Land Use Plan
has already been exceeded, therefore another two weeks or another
month will not make any difference. However, the sooner the Ordinance
is enacted the projects that are pending will be under the standards,
Councilwoman Massaro said that she liked Councilman Zemel's suggestion
that Council be given copies of the Preliminary Site Plan. She said
if Staff reviews the Preliminary and gives the Council a copy of their
report, it will give them the same information as if there were a
review of the Preliminary Plan by the Planning Commission. She
stated she was in favor of that, even though it means submitting five
extra sets of Plans.
Councilwoman Massaro MOVED'that Temporary Ordinance #878 be TABLED
and sent to the Planning Commission for their review, input and action,
after which it will come back to Council for their consideration
and action on September 23rd.
Councilman Zemel SECONDED the Motion.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
48. Springlake II - Revised Site Plan - Discussion and possible
action on a revised site plan foF the Recreation area.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled because of question
involving Site Plan as presented.!
Julian Bryan represented the Revised Site Plan for Springlake II
Recreation Area. He noted the Plan was Tabled at the Meeting on
July 24, and the July 27 Meeting was finished before he arrived.
Mr. Bryan explained the Site Plan has been revised, moving the
Recreation area to the south parcel. He commented that only 30
seconds ago he saw a memorandum from Richard Rubin, Consultant
Planner, who stated there should be a fee for a revised Site Plan.
Mr. Bryan said they were revising the Plan in the context of it
having Council and Staff input at the time of the Meeting and
Mr. Bryan stated he was not advised of the fee for a revised Site
Plan, or he would have brought a check in.
Mr. Bryan stated the Site Plan is revised pursuant to discussion
at the July 24 Meeting and he has added additional notes, #27 and
#28 to the Site Plan on the Sheet that has the notes, and they re-
flect the fact that the Recreation facility will be for Springlake
South which is 48 single-family homes and that the facility will
not be applicable to the north half of the property. Also, he said
in the body of the notes, # 20, he added the distinction.
Councilwoman Massaro commented that she realized the item was Tabled
as Mr. Brvan was not present at the previous Meeting, but after
the Meeting she had spoken with Lon Rubin and indicated certain
things had been brought up at the Meeting and Mr. Rubin indicated
he would not need anything until the September Meeting. Also, he
said in the meantime everything would be straightened out so there
would be no problems. Councilwoman Massaro said she was shocked to
see it coming through again, and she is further surprised at the
way it is being done. City Attorney Birken indicated Mr. Rubin sent
a memo to'Council on July 24 explaining how he would propose for it
to have been done and he thought everyone had a copy of the memo.
Councilwoman Massaro said she did not see the memo. She stated she
has strong reservations about what is being done since Council approved
a Site Plan for the entire project and now they are coming through
with both halves still on it, and Council would be approving a Clubhouse
that is not adequate for the whole project but is only to apply to half
of it, but still the other half does not have any Clubhouse. She
said she thought it should not be acted upon, and she preferred to
Table the Item until the September Meeting.
Julian Bryan said Lon Rubin must:have been speaking in the context
of Northwood II when he said the matter could wait until the September
Meeting, he was not speaking about Springlake II.
-4- 7/31/81 /lc
Julian Bryan explained it was his understanding that Springlake II
would be revised and he immediately met with Richard Rubin and Mr.
Birken and they discussed what might be required to allow the Club-
house to be approved on that site, and they revised the plans
accordingly in anticipation of it being heard at the meeting on
the 27th of July. Mr. Bryan said it was the understanding that he
would take the Clubhouse area that was shown on one sheet of the two -
sheet drawing set, and move it to the other set and make appropriate
notes and representations in the Site Plan as would be necessary to
reflect that the 48 dwelling units would utilize the Recreation
facility, and the balance of the tract would not. Further, he reflected
in the documents that they had already paid $95.00 a unit for local
parks for the entire 221 units, and in fact the Recreation facility
would not be required for any of the parcel.
Mr. Bryan said the north half of the Site Plan would have to come in
to be amended and he is working on that at the County level. He
said he has a letter from Col. Wilson acknowledging the whole proposal
and recommendations made for procedural aspects have been proper and
correct. Councilwoman Massaro said the whole approved plan is nullified
and becomes two different projects now. She said there would have
to be two different Site Plans because they approved one Site Plan and
the Recreation Parcel has to accomodate both.
Vice Mayor Disraelly concurred that if there is a change both Site Plans
must be changed. Mr. Bryan explained all he is asking is that the
Recreation facilities be divided. Vice Mayor Disraelly said the Rec-
reation area is being divided into two areas. He noted a 1.3 acre
Recreation Area had been approved, and now Mr. Bryan indicates he does
not want that, but wants another 3/4 of an acre for the Recreation Area
and wants the City to forget about the other area.
Councilwoman Massaro indicated they would have to rescind action on
the entire area, north and south. The City Attorney said that Council
can approve what has been submitted, if it satisfies the regulations
for the area in the Code. Mr. Birken said if he wished to split the
project and provide amenities for part of the project and not for the
other part, he has the right to do so. Councilwoman Massaro said that
was correct provided they only approve the Recreation Building and
rescind the action on the approval of the whole Recreation Area.
Councilwoman Massaro explained in the original approval, the whole
site was approved as a Recreation Area and Mr. Bryan was to submit
application for rezoning of the whole area for recreation before
the first permit was issued. That has not been done, Councilwoman
Massaro said they would have to know what was planned for the entire
area. Mr. Bryan disagreed, he said they would be precluded from ever
using it for anything else. He stated what he has submitted is proper.
Councilwoman Massaro said she either wished to table the matter, or
to act only on the one area and rescind the original action. Mr.
Bryan said there is no purpose to rescind the original action. Council-
woman Massaro said they must have time to analyze what is being done.
In the meantime they should decide what they really want to do and
come back with the proper applications. Councilwoman Massaro pointed
out that Mr. Bryan should have applied for rezoning of the area before
applying for his first permit, and he has not done that.
Mr. Bryan stated that they have applied for rezoning prior to any
annlication within the Recreation area.
Councilwoman Massaro MOVED that the Item be TABLED until the second
Meeting in September.
Mr. Bryan asked that Council not expect some changed application or
new enlightening information because they do not know what else to do.
TAPE He said they feel they have made the proper application. He said they
#2 will not know for a number of months what configuration the north half
of the property might take, since that would have to come in for Site
Plan approval and review and consideration by Planning and Zoning and
Staff. So they will not be making changes for quite some time.
Councilwoman Massaro suggested they zone the entire parcel for recreation.
Mr. Bryan said they are not willing to do that.
-5-
7/31/81 /lc
Councilwoman Massaro repeated her Motion, and she MOVED that the
Item be. Tabled until the second Meeting in September, which is
September 23rd. Councilman Zemel SECONDED the Motion.
VOTE:
ALL VOTED AYE.
84. Beautification Committee - Temp. Reso. #2019 - Discussion and
possible action to appoint members to this Committee.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: E. Ervin Gayle Appointed as Regular RESO.# R-1Q-1,9ASSE:
Member, Morris Landman appointed as Alternate
Member, terms to expire 4/9/82. Temp. Reso. #2019 Adopted.
City Attorney Birken read the Title of the Resolution.
Councilman Kravitz stated he has submitted a ballot to members of
Council, because of the twelve people that have applied. However
he made a note of the fact that E. Ervin Gayle is now serving as
an alternate and wishes to be considered as a regular member.
Also, it is the request of the Chairman, Ray Baade that Mr. Gayle
be considered as a regular member. Mr. Baade also asked that
Morris Landman be considered, as the new alternate. Therefore,
Councilman Kravitz NOMINATED E. Ervin Gayle as the regular member,
and Morris Landman as Alternate, both terms to expire April 9, 1982.
Councilwoman Massaro indicated she had submitted the name of Peter A. Jendza
for the Recreation Board, and he has now asked to be on the Beautifica-
tion Committee,if possible,and she would like to nominate him as a
second alternate for the Beautification Committee. Mrs. Bochenek,
Vice Chairman of the Beautification Committee, asked if those who
have been nominated were. questioned concerning their availability
during the summer months. Vice Mayor Disraelly noted that there are
three alternates, one of whom is suggested as a regular member, and
he heartily recommended that he become a permanent member of the
Committee, and that is Mr. Gayle. There is only one position open
at the present time as an alternate. Councilwoman Massaro withdrew
.qr. Jendza's name from nomination.
Vice Mayor Disraelly
Gayle as the Regular
Alternate Member.
VOTE:
MOVED that Temp. 2019 be ADOPTED appointing E. Ervi
Member and Morris Landman be appointed as the
Councilwoman Massaro SECONDED the Motion.
ALL VOTED AYE.
85. Mainlands Section 16 - Revised Site Plan.
Concrete Slab for the recreation area.
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved since
there is no change in traffic
circulation.
For Sunshade and
Mayor Falck explained that information has been distributed to Council
indicating a formal application has been made for this project, the
fees have been paid.
Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED that since there is no change in traffic
circulation, that the proposed slab and proposed sunshade for Section
16 be approved. Councilwoman Massaro SECONDED the Motion.
VOTE: Councilman Kravitz AYE
Councilman Zemel ABSENT
Councilwoman Massaro AYE
Vice Mayor Disraelly AYE
Mayor Falck AYE
86. Tamarac Utilities West - Purchase of Capital Equipment.
(a) Purchase of 1 Bench Turbidity Meter and 1 salinity
Conductivity Temperature Meter.
(b) Approved purchase of one 10' x 16' aluminum shed with
double doors/installed and tied down at a cost of $1700.
(c) Hand Portable Insect Fogger/Gas Driven Approved, and
insecticide.
7/31/81
/lc
SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: (a), (b), (c) Approved.
The City Manager explained that (a), (b), and (c) under Item #86
these are unanticipated expenditures for this fiscal year which are
due to circumstances, as follows:
(a) There is a need to meet HRS Standards for the bacteriological
laboratory at Utilities West. They are asking to be permitted
to purchase the items, and there is money available in the
Utility Budget for the purchase of the items.
Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED that the City Manager be authorized to
purchase a Bench Turbidity Meter at the price of $805.00 and a Salinity
Conductivity Temperature Meter at the price of $448.00, the funds to
come from their normal, resources. Councilman Kravitz SECONDED.
VOTE:
VOTE:
VOTE:
Councilman Kravitz AYE
Councilman Zemel ABSENT
Councilwoman Massaro AYE
Vice Mayor Disraelly AYE
Mayor Falck AYE
(b) Under new EPA and OCEA standards the City is required to have
separate storage of the CUES Sealing Materials. To house the
units it would be necessary to build a facility or buy a shed.
The City Manager indicated it was felt to be more practical
to purchase an aluminum shed which would be sealed and installed
at $1700. The money is available for the purchase.
Vice Mayor Disraelly inquired if the fund would include the tie -down
which is required. The City Manager indicated it would. The slab
is also included, and the work will be in accordance with City Standards.
More than one vendor was solicited, according to Mr. Keating, and Ted
Sheds was the recommended vendor.
Councilwoman Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of the requisition for the
aluminum shed in the amount of $1700. installed and tied down.
Councilman Kravitz SECONDED.
ALL VOTED AYE.
(c) City Manager Stuurmans explained the reason the present fogger
can not be used in this instance is that it drives around and
can not be used in the lift area. The requisition is for a
small hand-held model with a high intensity. Ms. Stuurmans
said there is considerable concentration of mosquitoes around
the lift stations and when the men must go into the lift
station they are able to take the hand-held unit to be used
inside the lift station. The unit is gas powered. The unit
has a tremendous amount of intensity and could be used on the
streets, also.
Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED APPROVAL of the purchase of a portable
insect fogger for $495.00. Provisions are to be made for the purchase
of concentrate insecticide, providing the price is not higher than
the price at Public Works, otherwise it will be transferred from
Public Works. Councilman Kravitz SECONDED the Motion.
ALL VOTED AYE.
87. Tamarac Utilities West - Emergency Repair - One Hoffman Air
Blower in the amount o 5084.
The City Manager indicated to Council in a memorandum of July 28
that the matter had been briefly referencedat the close of the
pre -agenda workshop. An air blower at the utility plant had broken
down and this required immediate repair. There were two possible
vendors, one in Tampa and one locally. The prices were comparable
-7-
and it was decided to use Florida Pump & Motor, the local vendor.
The cost of the work was $5084.00. The emergency action was
necessary since it is essential to the operation of that portion
of the Utilities that deals with biological processing.
Vice Mayor Disraelly stated since it is an emergency, and the Council
will not meet until September, and since the work was required he MOVED
APPROVAL of the action taken by the City Engineer, through the City
Manager, for the emergency rebuilding of the pump and blower in the
amount of $5084.00. Councilman Zemel SECONDED.
VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE
88. Lanzo Construction Company - 1980 Storm Drainage Augmentation -
Dascussion anci Possible Action concerning approval of payment
t�hhee a ount of $16,7,29.70 to .Lanzo Construction Company.
SYNOPSIS OF A i1DI�T: Iproved emergency action
taken y City Mgr, for payment to Lanzo
construction Co. in amount of $16,229.70.
VOTE:
Vice Mayor Disraelly explained that the matter was brought.to Council,,
through the City Manager, by the City Engineer who requested
and recommended a payment in the amount of $16,229.70 to Lanzo.
Construction Company, as the third estimate payment. There is still
considerable work to be done, and the City is still retaining $16,000
as a retainage percentage.
Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED APPROVAL of the payment to Lanzo Construction
Company in the amount of $16,229.70 for Estimate No. 3. Councilwoman
Massaro SECONDED the Motion.
ALL VOTED AYE
Councilman Zemel, as Veterans Liaison member, stated that it was
with deep regret he announced the passing of one of Tamarac's
public spirited citizens, Harry Weisenberg. Councilman Zemel said
that Mr. Weisenberg will be one of the people of the City who will
really be missed by those in City Hall. He was President of
Westwood Community 24 and through his activities as Civic Chairman
attended the meetings and Council felt that he was knowledgable
enough, and with the integrity to be appointed to a City Commission.
He was appointed to the Planning Commission three years ago. In the
interim Mr. Weisenberg was ill and not reappointed, however recently
he felt well enough to be appointed as an alternate to the Planning
Commission. Mr. Weisenberg was also President of the Tamarac Veterans
Alliance that was recently formed among the Veterans in Tamarac. He
will be sorely missed, On behalf of the Mayor and Council, Councilman
Zemel stated Mr. Weisenberg is a man who has done a job for himself,
his family, and the City in a manner that can only call for a "Well
Done".
Vice Mayor Disraelly discussed a memorandum from Alan Ruf concerning
Florida Li�;it <. Power about the poles, etc. In the area of the
Jehovah's Witness Church there will be concrete poles installed to
go along with whatever is there. On 78th Street, the poles will be
set into the trees and Councilman Disraelly said he had taken it
be
himself to indicate to Tract 7.4 and 75 that wood poles would
:.1e better than concrete nolA.s Sir.cp Wfnulr. "nit In with the
landscaping and be less visible than concrete in that area.
Councilman Disraelly said it should be looked at from tract to tract
to see whether it is open land or whether it is wooded land. Mayor
Falck noted that the wood looks much better. Councilwoman Massaro
suggested a discussion with Florida Power & Light would help.
The Meeting was adjourned at 11:20 A.M.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
\fir'
MAY
This public document was promulgated at a cost of $ 0,6y' or $ �?, <P"d
per copy, to inform the general public officers and employees about
recent opinions and considerations by the City Council of Tamarac.
-8-
tis''dj1Jr, BY 7/31/81
UT11 COuid ,;L C;J . 3 / g/ / lc