Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-07-31 - City Commission Reconvened Regular Meeting Minutesei'iC 1\10R-9siWR':z"i'i 383H AVENUE W fA[VIA F3AC, FEAR➢isA 3:332"1 x TELEPHONE (305) 722-5000 July 27, 1981 NOTICE OF RECONVENED REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA There will be a reconvened regular meeting of the City Council on Friday, July 31, 1981, at 10:00 A.M., in the Council Chambers at City Hall. To be discussed are the following items from the July 24 reconvened meeting: 36. Enforcement of Zoning Regulations - Temp. Ord. #886 - Discussion and possible action to designate the official authorized to enforce the zoning regulations within Chapter 28 of the City Code. Second Reading. (tabled from 7/8/81) 39. Site Plan and Development Review Regulations - Temp._Ord. #878 -- Discussion and possible action to amend Article II of Chapter 7 of the Code to provide procedures for the develop- ment of and improvements to real property in the City. First Reading. 48. Springlake II - Revised Site Plan - Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan for the Recreation area. 84. Beautification Committee - Temp. Reso. #2019 - Discussion and possible action to appoint members to this Committee. Council may consider such other business as may come before it. Carol A. Evans Assistant City Clerk Pursuant to Chapter 80-105 of Florida Law, Senate Bill No. 368; If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record the proceedings and for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING (Reconvened from 7/22/81, 7/24/81 and. 7/27/81) July 31, 1981 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Falck called the Reconvened City Council Meeting to order on Friday, July 31, 1981, at 10:00 A.M. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Walter W. Falck Vice Mayor Irving M. Disraelly Councilwoman Helen Massaro Councilman Irving Zemel Councilman Philip Kravitz ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Arthur M. Birken City Manager Laura Z. Stuurmans 85. Mainlands 16 - Revised Site Plan - Discussion and Possible Action regarding request to Provide a Sun Shelter. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT (See Page 6 Vice Mayor. Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT, an Item relating to Mainlands 16 Revised Site Plan. Councilman Zemel SECONDED. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE. 86. Tamarac Utilities West - Purchase of Capital Equipment. Discussion and Possible Action concerning three requisitions for Tamarac Utilities West, Items a), b) and c). SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT See Pages _,& VOTE: Vice Mayor. Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT, Tamarac Utilities West, Item a) Requisition for Bench Turbidity Meter and one Salinity Meter; Item b) Requisition for a 10'x 16' Aluminum Shed; and Item c) a Portable Insect Fogger and insecticide. Councilman Zemel SECONDED. ALL VOTED AYE. 87. Tamarac Utilities West - Emergency Repair. Discussion and Possible Action concerning emergency action taken by City Manager for the repair of one Hoffman Air Blower, in the amount of $5084. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION (See Page 6 ) AGENDIZED BY CONSENT Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT emergency repair for an Air Blower for Tamarac Uti ities West. Councilman Zemel SECONDED. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE. 88. Lanza Construction Company - 1980 Storm Drainage Augmentation. Discussion and Possible Action concerning approval of payment in the amount of $16,229.70 to Lanzo Construction Company. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDIZED BY CONSENT (See Page Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT Discussion and Possible Action concerning payment to Lanzo Construction Company in the amount of $16,229.70 for storm drainage augmentation on McNab and 88th Avenue. This has been requested by the City Engineer and approved by the City Manager. Councilwoman Massaro SECONDED. VOTE ALL VOTED AYE. on 7/31/81 /lc 89. Tamarac Gardens - Model Sales Facility - Discussion Action concerning approval of --extension of Building a period of six months for the first building. and Possible Permit for SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: AGENDZZED BY CONSENT See Page Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED to AGENDIZE BY CONSENT discussion and possible Action concerning Tamarac Gardens Model Sales Facility request for extension of Building Permit for six months. Councilwoman Massaro SECONDED. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE Vice Mayor Disraelly indicated he had a request for the City Manager to go to bid for six vehicles for the building department. Six vehicles had been authorized, but because of the time element it was suggested they not be purchased at that time�.__but _to _Mwait and_ purchase the 1981's as soon as the 1982's come out. The Vice ayor said it was the feeling of the Purchasing Agent that they could be purchased cheaper by bid than to use a State Contract for a 1981 vehicle. Councilwoman Massaro questioned the use of air conditioners in those cars, noting that the Building Inspectors are supposed to be on the job making inspections. She suggested the matter be held until September to give the City Manager an opportunity to look into the matter before advertising. Councilman Zemel commented that he had been wondering why they have not been looking forward to the sales at the Post Office of the Jeeps which have been very successful units. Councilwoman Massaro suggested waiting until September to enable the City Manager to research the matter. The City Manager agreed to look into the matter. 89. Tamarac Gardens - Model Sales Facility - Discussion and Possible Action concerning approval of ---extension of Building Permit for a period of six months for the first building. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Extension Granted for six months from date of expiration. Councilwoman Massaro MOVED that the Building Permit be extended for another six months for the first building for Tamarac Gardens from the date of expiration. Vice Mayor Disraelly SECONDED. 1 111000 ALL VOTED AYE 36. Enforcement of Zoning Regulations -- Tem . Ord. #886. Discussion and Possible Action to designate the official authorized to enforce the zoning regulations within Chapter 28 of the City Code. Second Reading. (tabled from 7/8/81). SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled until Second Meeting in September. The City Attorney said the Public Hearing has been held, and the Mayor had read the Title on the second reading, so Council can take what- ever action they wish. Councilwoman Massaro stated that they have been working on Temp. Ord. #878, and she felt that the provision in #878, when finalized, is the same final action that should be in Temp.#886. Therefore, until #878 is approved, she MOVED Temp.�Ord#886 be TABLED until the second Meeting in September when they take action on Temp. #878. Councilman Zemel SECONDED. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE, 39. Site Plan and Development Review Regulations - Temp. Ord. #878 Discussion and possible action to amend Article II ot Chapter 7 of the Code to provide procedures for the development of and improvements to real property in the City. First Reading. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled to be sent to Planning Commission Tor input, to come back to Council for action on September 23. -2- 7/31/81 /lc The City Attorney read the Title of the Ordinance,- He explained during the week there had been meetings on Staff level and with Council, considering the Ordinance. He commented there have been no significant modifications to the content, there is one crane. There have been many changes to the format. The one area where there is supposed to be a major change pertains to Preliminary Site Plan approval. The recommendation which he would appreciate Council discussing is for Preliminary Site Plan to be approved by Staff and not by the Planning Commission; and then for the Final Site Plan to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and Staff, and finally the Council. The City Attorney pointed out that would be a significant time -saving factor. He indicated there was a Workshop in 1978 on the subject and it would be a reasonable way to solve the problem. The Planning Commission would still get to look at and review the Site Plans. or City Attorney Birken recommended to the Council that the Ordinance be redrafted and referred back to the Planning Commission for them to consider in September with instructions that they take action on the matter and then it be brought back to Council at their September Meeting. He pointed out the Land Use Plan element does require that detailed regulations be prepared, however they will only be losing an additional two weeks in the approval process. He said he did not think it would be fair to Council to go through the many changes without their having time to review them and think about them. Councilwoman Massaro said she thinks having the Preliminary Plans go to Staff only is a good move, and will not preclude any developer from coming to Planning Commission with a Concept Plan. The City Attorney stated that Vice Mayor Disraelly had expressed concern about Council not knowing when a Site Plan is in-house for review until it goes before the Planning Commission, and he suggested to remedy the situation that the Ordinance contain language instructing Staff to notify Council within 48 hours of submission of the Site Plan as to what has been requested so that Council, if interested, could contact the appropriate Staff people to work with them as far as development is concerned, or to make recommendations. Councilwoman Massaro indicated she thought that was a good suggestion. Vice Mayor Disraelly commented that he felt individual members of Council do not know about many of the projects that come into the City and unfortunately Council does not know, iintil.thei.y:appear on the Planning Commission Agenda. He said if there is only a Final Site Plan they would have it on the first Wednesday of the month and Council would not know about that until the Agenda was printed the weekend prior to that. The Vice Mayor pointed out it is possible, and has happened, at the Meeting on the first Wednesday the Planning Commission approves a Plan and at the Pre -agenda Meeting on Thursday it is put on the Agenda. Council does not get the packet until Friday afternoon and they have a week -end to review it and there may be a half a dozen Site Plans on the Agenda. Vice Mayor Disraelly indicated if there is a preliminary review they have time to read and digest the referencesas to the Planning Commission's feeling. The Vice Mayor indicated the Planning Commission has been doing a good job and they point out a number of things they feel should be done in addition to the Staff recommendations, with regard to the Preliminary Site Plan. In the meantime, Council has an opportunity to read what has happened. Vice Mayor Disraelly stated that, at least until he has time to review it, he would not be in favor of having a single reading for the Planning Commission and then a week later having Council act on it. Councilman Zemel stated he would have no objection to the Preliminary Site Plan being reviewed by Staff in lieu of going through the normal procedure of going through the Planning Commission, however he would insist that when Preliminary Site Plans are submitted to the City that information and copies of these Preliminary Plans be passed to every Council member. Mayor Falck inquired if there was objection to the proposal that Temp. #878 be redrafted and submitted to the Planning Commission for review and action, and then come to the Council for review and action. Vice Mayor Disraelly noted that he would prefer that it not come before Council until the September 23rd Meeting. As far as the review is concerned, he stated he would like to hear -3- 7/11 /R1 /1, the input of the Planning Commission with regard to the Preliminary and Final. versus Final only. The City Attorney commented tb.e neriod set forth by the Land Use Plan has already been exceeded, therefore another two weeks or another month will not make any difference. However, the sooner the Ordinance is enacted the projects that are pending will be under the standards, Councilwoman Massaro said that she liked Councilman Zemel's suggestion that Council be given copies of the Preliminary Site Plan. She said if Staff reviews the Preliminary and gives the Council a copy of their report, it will give them the same information as if there were a review of the Preliminary Plan by the Planning Commission. She stated she was in favor of that, even though it means submitting five extra sets of Plans. Councilwoman Massaro MOVED'that Temporary Ordinance #878 be TABLED and sent to the Planning Commission for their review, input and action, after which it will come back to Council for their consideration and action on September 23rd. Councilman Zemel SECONDED the Motion. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 48. Springlake II - Revised Site Plan - Discussion and possible action on a revised site plan foF the Recreation area. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Tabled because of question involving Site Plan as presented.! Julian Bryan represented the Revised Site Plan for Springlake II Recreation Area. He noted the Plan was Tabled at the Meeting on July 24, and the July 27 Meeting was finished before he arrived. Mr. Bryan explained the Site Plan has been revised, moving the Recreation area to the south parcel. He commented that only 30 seconds ago he saw a memorandum from Richard Rubin, Consultant Planner, who stated there should be a fee for a revised Site Plan. Mr. Bryan said they were revising the Plan in the context of it having Council and Staff input at the time of the Meeting and Mr. Bryan stated he was not advised of the fee for a revised Site Plan, or he would have brought a check in. Mr. Bryan stated the Site Plan is revised pursuant to discussion at the July 24 Meeting and he has added additional notes, #27 and #28 to the Site Plan on the Sheet that has the notes, and they re- flect the fact that the Recreation facility will be for Springlake South which is 48 single-family homes and that the facility will not be applicable to the north half of the property. Also, he said in the body of the notes, # 20, he added the distinction. Councilwoman Massaro commented that she realized the item was Tabled as Mr. Brvan was not present at the previous Meeting, but after the Meeting she had spoken with Lon Rubin and indicated certain things had been brought up at the Meeting and Mr. Rubin indicated he would not need anything until the September Meeting. Also, he said in the meantime everything would be straightened out so there would be no problems. Councilwoman Massaro said she was shocked to see it coming through again, and she is further surprised at the way it is being done. City Attorney Birken indicated Mr. Rubin sent a memo to'Council on July 24 explaining how he would propose for it to have been done and he thought everyone had a copy of the memo. Councilwoman Massaro said she did not see the memo. She stated she has strong reservations about what is being done since Council approved a Site Plan for the entire project and now they are coming through with both halves still on it, and Council would be approving a Clubhouse that is not adequate for the whole project but is only to apply to half of it, but still the other half does not have any Clubhouse. She said she thought it should not be acted upon, and she preferred to Table the Item until the September Meeting. Julian Bryan said Lon Rubin must:have been speaking in the context of Northwood II when he said the matter could wait until the September Meeting, he was not speaking about Springlake II. -4- 7/31/81 /lc Julian Bryan explained it was his understanding that Springlake II would be revised and he immediately met with Richard Rubin and Mr. Birken and they discussed what might be required to allow the Club- house to be approved on that site, and they revised the plans accordingly in anticipation of it being heard at the meeting on the 27th of July. Mr. Bryan said it was the understanding that he would take the Clubhouse area that was shown on one sheet of the two - sheet drawing set, and move it to the other set and make appropriate notes and representations in the Site Plan as would be necessary to reflect that the 48 dwelling units would utilize the Recreation facility, and the balance of the tract would not. Further, he reflected in the documents that they had already paid $95.00 a unit for local parks for the entire 221 units, and in fact the Recreation facility would not be required for any of the parcel. Mr. Bryan said the north half of the Site Plan would have to come in to be amended and he is working on that at the County level. He said he has a letter from Col. Wilson acknowledging the whole proposal and recommendations made for procedural aspects have been proper and correct. Councilwoman Massaro said the whole approved plan is nullified and becomes two different projects now. She said there would have to be two different Site Plans because they approved one Site Plan and the Recreation Parcel has to accomodate both. Vice Mayor Disraelly concurred that if there is a change both Site Plans must be changed. Mr. Bryan explained all he is asking is that the Recreation facilities be divided. Vice Mayor Disraelly said the Rec- reation area is being divided into two areas. He noted a 1.3 acre Recreation Area had been approved, and now Mr. Bryan indicates he does not want that, but wants another 3/4 of an acre for the Recreation Area and wants the City to forget about the other area. Councilwoman Massaro indicated they would have to rescind action on the entire area, north and south. The City Attorney said that Council can approve what has been submitted, if it satisfies the regulations for the area in the Code. Mr. Birken said if he wished to split the project and provide amenities for part of the project and not for the other part, he has the right to do so. Councilwoman Massaro said that was correct provided they only approve the Recreation Building and rescind the action on the approval of the whole Recreation Area. Councilwoman Massaro explained in the original approval, the whole site was approved as a Recreation Area and Mr. Bryan was to submit application for rezoning of the whole area for recreation before the first permit was issued. That has not been done, Councilwoman Massaro said they would have to know what was planned for the entire area. Mr. Bryan disagreed, he said they would be precluded from ever using it for anything else. He stated what he has submitted is proper. Councilwoman Massaro said she either wished to table the matter, or to act only on the one area and rescind the original action. Mr. Bryan said there is no purpose to rescind the original action. Council- woman Massaro said they must have time to analyze what is being done. In the meantime they should decide what they really want to do and come back with the proper applications. Councilwoman Massaro pointed out that Mr. Bryan should have applied for rezoning of the area before applying for his first permit, and he has not done that. Mr. Bryan stated that they have applied for rezoning prior to any annlication within the Recreation area. Councilwoman Massaro MOVED that the Item be TABLED until the second Meeting in September. Mr. Bryan asked that Council not expect some changed application or new enlightening information because they do not know what else to do. TAPE He said they feel they have made the proper application. He said they #2 will not know for a number of months what configuration the north half of the property might take, since that would have to come in for Site Plan approval and review and consideration by Planning and Zoning and Staff. So they will not be making changes for quite some time. Councilwoman Massaro suggested they zone the entire parcel for recreation. Mr. Bryan said they are not willing to do that. -5- 7/31/81 /lc Councilwoman Massaro repeated her Motion, and she MOVED that the Item be. Tabled until the second Meeting in September, which is September 23rd. Councilman Zemel SECONDED the Motion. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE. 84. Beautification Committee - Temp. Reso. #2019 - Discussion and possible action to appoint members to this Committee. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: E. Ervin Gayle Appointed as Regular RESO.# R-1Q-1,9ASSE: Member, Morris Landman appointed as Alternate Member, terms to expire 4/9/82. Temp. Reso. #2019 Adopted. City Attorney Birken read the Title of the Resolution. Councilman Kravitz stated he has submitted a ballot to members of Council, because of the twelve people that have applied. However he made a note of the fact that E. Ervin Gayle is now serving as an alternate and wishes to be considered as a regular member. Also, it is the request of the Chairman, Ray Baade that Mr. Gayle be considered as a regular member. Mr. Baade also asked that Morris Landman be considered, as the new alternate. Therefore, Councilman Kravitz NOMINATED E. Ervin Gayle as the regular member, and Morris Landman as Alternate, both terms to expire April 9, 1982. Councilwoman Massaro indicated she had submitted the name of Peter A. Jendza for the Recreation Board, and he has now asked to be on the Beautifica- tion Committee,if possible,and she would like to nominate him as a second alternate for the Beautification Committee. Mrs. Bochenek, Vice Chairman of the Beautification Committee, asked if those who have been nominated were. questioned concerning their availability during the summer months. Vice Mayor Disraelly noted that there are three alternates, one of whom is suggested as a regular member, and he heartily recommended that he become a permanent member of the Committee, and that is Mr. Gayle. There is only one position open at the present time as an alternate. Councilwoman Massaro withdrew .qr. Jendza's name from nomination. Vice Mayor Disraelly Gayle as the Regular Alternate Member. VOTE: MOVED that Temp. 2019 be ADOPTED appointing E. Ervi Member and Morris Landman be appointed as the Councilwoman Massaro SECONDED the Motion. ALL VOTED AYE. 85. Mainlands Section 16 - Revised Site Plan. Concrete Slab for the recreation area. SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: Approved since there is no change in traffic circulation. For Sunshade and Mayor Falck explained that information has been distributed to Council indicating a formal application has been made for this project, the fees have been paid. Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED that since there is no change in traffic circulation, that the proposed slab and proposed sunshade for Section 16 be approved. Councilwoman Massaro SECONDED the Motion. VOTE: Councilman Kravitz AYE Councilman Zemel ABSENT Councilwoman Massaro AYE Vice Mayor Disraelly AYE Mayor Falck AYE 86. Tamarac Utilities West - Purchase of Capital Equipment. (a) Purchase of 1 Bench Turbidity Meter and 1 salinity Conductivity Temperature Meter. (b) Approved purchase of one 10' x 16' aluminum shed with double doors/installed and tied down at a cost of $1700. (c) Hand Portable Insect Fogger/Gas Driven Approved, and insecticide. 7/31/81 /lc SYNOPSIS OF ACTION: (a), (b), (c) Approved. The City Manager explained that (a), (b), and (c) under Item #86 these are unanticipated expenditures for this fiscal year which are due to circumstances, as follows: (a) There is a need to meet HRS Standards for the bacteriological laboratory at Utilities West. They are asking to be permitted to purchase the items, and there is money available in the Utility Budget for the purchase of the items. Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED that the City Manager be authorized to purchase a Bench Turbidity Meter at the price of $805.00 and a Salinity Conductivity Temperature Meter at the price of $448.00, the funds to come from their normal, resources. Councilman Kravitz SECONDED. VOTE: VOTE: VOTE: Councilman Kravitz AYE Councilman Zemel ABSENT Councilwoman Massaro AYE Vice Mayor Disraelly AYE Mayor Falck AYE (b) Under new EPA and OCEA standards the City is required to have separate storage of the CUES Sealing Materials. To house the units it would be necessary to build a facility or buy a shed. The City Manager indicated it was felt to be more practical to purchase an aluminum shed which would be sealed and installed at $1700. The money is available for the purchase. Vice Mayor Disraelly inquired if the fund would include the tie -down which is required. The City Manager indicated it would. The slab is also included, and the work will be in accordance with City Standards. More than one vendor was solicited, according to Mr. Keating, and Ted Sheds was the recommended vendor. Councilwoman Massaro MOVED APPROVAL of the requisition for the aluminum shed in the amount of $1700. installed and tied down. Councilman Kravitz SECONDED. ALL VOTED AYE. (c) City Manager Stuurmans explained the reason the present fogger can not be used in this instance is that it drives around and can not be used in the lift area. The requisition is for a small hand-held model with a high intensity. Ms. Stuurmans said there is considerable concentration of mosquitoes around the lift stations and when the men must go into the lift station they are able to take the hand-held unit to be used inside the lift station. The unit is gas powered. The unit has a tremendous amount of intensity and could be used on the streets, also. Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED APPROVAL of the purchase of a portable insect fogger for $495.00. Provisions are to be made for the purchase of concentrate insecticide, providing the price is not higher than the price at Public Works, otherwise it will be transferred from Public Works. Councilman Kravitz SECONDED the Motion. ALL VOTED AYE. 87. Tamarac Utilities West - Emergency Repair - One Hoffman Air Blower in the amount o 5084. The City Manager indicated to Council in a memorandum of July 28 that the matter had been briefly referencedat the close of the pre -agenda workshop. An air blower at the utility plant had broken down and this required immediate repair. There were two possible vendors, one in Tampa and one locally. The prices were comparable -7- and it was decided to use Florida Pump & Motor, the local vendor. The cost of the work was $5084.00. The emergency action was necessary since it is essential to the operation of that portion of the Utilities that deals with biological processing. Vice Mayor Disraelly stated since it is an emergency, and the Council will not meet until September, and since the work was required he MOVED APPROVAL of the action taken by the City Engineer, through the City Manager, for the emergency rebuilding of the pump and blower in the amount of $5084.00. Councilman Zemel SECONDED. VOTE: ALL VOTED AYE 88. Lanzo Construction Company - 1980 Storm Drainage Augmentation - Dascussion anci Possible Action concerning approval of payment t�hhee a ount of $16,7,29.70 to .Lanzo Construction Company. SYNOPSIS OF A i1DI�T: Iproved emergency action taken y City Mgr, for payment to Lanzo construction Co. in amount of $16,229.70. VOTE: Vice Mayor Disraelly explained that the matter was brought.to Council,, through the City Manager, by the City Engineer who requested and recommended a payment in the amount of $16,229.70 to Lanzo. Construction Company, as the third estimate payment. There is still considerable work to be done, and the City is still retaining $16,000 as a retainage percentage. Vice Mayor Disraelly MOVED APPROVAL of the payment to Lanzo Construction Company in the amount of $16,229.70 for Estimate No. 3. Councilwoman Massaro SECONDED the Motion. ALL VOTED AYE Councilman Zemel, as Veterans Liaison member, stated that it was with deep regret he announced the passing of one of Tamarac's public spirited citizens, Harry Weisenberg. Councilman Zemel said that Mr. Weisenberg will be one of the people of the City who will really be missed by those in City Hall. He was President of Westwood Community 24 and through his activities as Civic Chairman attended the meetings and Council felt that he was knowledgable enough, and with the integrity to be appointed to a City Commission. He was appointed to the Planning Commission three years ago. In the interim Mr. Weisenberg was ill and not reappointed, however recently he felt well enough to be appointed as an alternate to the Planning Commission. Mr. Weisenberg was also President of the Tamarac Veterans Alliance that was recently formed among the Veterans in Tamarac. He will be sorely missed, On behalf of the Mayor and Council, Councilman Zemel stated Mr. Weisenberg is a man who has done a job for himself, his family, and the City in a manner that can only call for a "Well Done". Vice Mayor Disraelly discussed a memorandum from Alan Ruf concerning Florida Li�;it <. Power about the poles, etc. In the area of the Jehovah's Witness Church there will be concrete poles installed to go along with whatever is there. On 78th Street, the poles will be set into the trees and Councilman Disraelly said he had taken it be himself to indicate to Tract 7.4 and 75 that wood poles would :.1e better than concrete nolA.s Sir.cp Wfnulr. "nit In with the landscaping and be less visible than concrete in that area. Councilman Disraelly said it should be looked at from tract to tract to see whether it is open land or whether it is wooded land. Mayor Falck noted that the wood looks much better. Councilwoman Massaro suggested a discussion with Florida Power & Light would help. The Meeting was adjourned at 11:20 A.M. ATTEST: CITY CLERK \fir' MAY This public document was promulgated at a cost of $ 0,6y' or $ �?, <P"d per copy, to inform the general public officers and employees about recent opinions and considerations by the City Council of Tamarac. -8- tis''dj1Jr, BY 7/31/81 UT11 COuid ,;L C;J . 3 / g/ / lc