HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-2013-021Temp Reso #12307
January 24, 2013
11Page
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-2013 a / -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
("CDBG") PROGRAM, FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 ANNUAL
ACTION PLAN TENTH PROGRAM YEAR TO PROVIDE
FOR A REVISION OF THE TARGET AREAS TO
INCLUDE THE AREAS DEPICTED IN EXHIBITS "G
THROUGH .1" WHICH ARE ATTACHED HERETO;
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tamarac ("City") is a Community Development Block
Grant ("CDBG") entitlement community; and
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2011, the City Commission approved Resolution
No. R-2011-22, which approved the First Substantial Amendment to the CDBG Program
Fiscal Year 2010/11 Annual Action Plan Tenth Program Year ("Action Plan") for the use
of the funds allocated to the City for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 3
("NSP-3"); and
WHEREAS, on March 14, 2012, the City Commission approved Resolution No.
R-2012-42, which approved the Second Substantial Amendment to the CDBG Program
Fiscal Year 2010/11 Annual Action Plan Tenth Program Year ("Action Plan") for the use
of the funds allocated to the City for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 3
("NSP-3"); and
Temp Reso #12307
January 24, 2013
2 1 P a g e
WHEREAS, pursuant to the NSP-3 guidelines, the City is permitted to expend
NSP-3 funds within the "areas of greatest need" as defined in the Action Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission desires to amend the Action Plan in order to
adjust the boundaries of the "areas of greatest need" in order to include other properties
that would be eligible to receive funds pursuant to the NSP-3 guidelines; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the amended "areas of greatest need" is attached hereto
as Exhibits "G through X, and incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it to be in the best interest of the
citizens and residents of the City of Tamarac to approve the amendment to the
boundaries of the "areas of greatest need" as provided in the City's Action Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TAM ARAC, FLORIDA THAT:
SECTION 1. The foregoing "WHEREAS" clauses are true and correct and
hereby ratified and confirmed by the City Commission. All exhibits attached hereto are
hereby incorporated herein.
SECTION 2. The City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, hereby
approves the amendment to the CDBG Program Fiscal Year 2010/11 Annual Action
Plan Tenth Program Year in order to amend the boundaries of the "areas of greatest
need", as depicted in Exhibits "G through X to this Resolution, in order to provide for
authorized expenditures in conformance with NSP-3 guidelines.
SECTION 3. The appropriate City officials are authorized and directed to
execute the necessary documents to comply with this Resolution.
Temp Reso #12307
January 24, 2013
3 1 P a g e
SECTION 4. All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict herewith, shall be
and are hereby repealed insofar as there is conflict or inconsistency.
SECTION 5. If any clause, section or other part of this Resolution shall be held
by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, such
unconstitutional or invalid part shall be considered eliminated and shall in no way affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and adoption by the City Commission.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CI
TAMARAC, FLORIDA THIS DAY OF
.,,E.
ATTEST:
PACT T E U F E
INTERIM CI'
BY:
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
2013.
MAYOR BETH TALABISCO
RECORD OF COMMISSION VOTE
CLERK MAYOR TALABISCO
DIST 1: COMM. BUSHNELL
DIST 2: COMM. ATKINS GRAD
DIST 3: COMM. GLASSER
DIST 4: WM DRESSLER.
HEREBY CERTIFY that
Have approved this
RESOLUTION as to form
Project Name: Mainland's 10
Neighborhood Block Group Block State
Block Group g Housing Group LISPS HMDA
Housing Units Units Score Min -
12011927567067506010SU1 268 951 20 17 995 514
Total Neighborhood Housing Units: 268
Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20.00
State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17
Tract Number
Tract NSP3 Need Score
State Minimum Qualifying NSP3 Score
HMDA Mortgages 2004 to 2007
Estimated Delinquent Mortgages°lo)
Total USPS Residential Addresses
LISPS Residential Addresses Vacant 90+ days
USPS Residential Addresses NoStat
NSP3 Options .
17 Cutrent Zoom Level
Show Tmob Outtn (Zpom 11+)
Vit;YY DATA
vtrwti FSWECTs
MMOCOWGY 8►itti'tttfCilONS i
NW Ord St
7000 ,
12011060105
20
17
1705
21.9
3300
84
10
Click here for an Overview
SW 20111 St SW 841h 00
y Woo
tiz
mow
.ti
The NSP3 mapping tool now•provldes a
summary NSP3 scan for all projscts,
dr'awm. Click on "View Projects", which
%
will list all of the projects (target Ones)
that have data calculated. it shows -the
NSP3 *con for each target ores along with
the total estimated housing units in that
`
area. At the bottom of the Rd Is a sum of
all housing units in all target anes and the
N8103 soon for tall target mass drawn.
Grantses an advised to know their state
minimum and tithe summary score Is less
than the slats minimum the grantee
should dNete, add, or revise target anus.
�.
Note that N you deists or add, the tool only
recalculates alter you close the "View
Projects bore and reopen it. HUD also
advises grantees to think oarefully about.
` F. •
the slat of their target areas in total. If
,, w " 1` ; ......`
those target areas have a very large
C,
number of total housing units rrotative to
4W
the dollar available, HUD will likely ask
Ave
that the grantee reduce the number andlor
7400
sine of their target areas.
You have lopped in successfully.
0
selh at �t
st
t4 Seth St
NW 59111 at
. `_'.
NW GO Terrace NW 62nd St
NW 01$l Si
eQth
i
E
S
f
C
NIA
' Sa Map deft 82013 Gan e - i a;
-Zo
c
EXHIBIT G
�x �f
Neighborhood ID: 3060485
NSP3 Planning Data
Grantee ID: 1230060E
Grantee State: FL
Grantee Name: TAMARAC
Grantee Address: 7525 NW 88 Avenue Tamarac FL 33321
Grantee Email: angelab@tamara.c.org
Neighborhood Name: Mainlands 10
Date:2013-01.22 00:00:00
NSP2 Score
The neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an
individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified target geography that is not less than
the lesser of 17 or the twentieth percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a state's
twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If,
however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum
need of 15. If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the
Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified
neighborhood.
Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20
State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17
Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 268
Area Benefit Eligibility
Percent Persons Less than 120% AM I: 68.2
Percent Persons Less than 80% AMI: 42.1
Neighborhood Attributes (Estima, tes)
Vacancy Estimate
USPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of
whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that
neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a
very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem.
The USPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However,
it can also be an address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development,
and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are
NoStat). When using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified.
In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the
residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and LISPS counts are substantially
different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For
example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the USPS residential address count may
be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PO boxes it may have fewer
addresses than housing units.
USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood: 280
Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (USPS, March 2010): 7
Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010): 1
113
EXHIBIT H
Y I 0
Foreclosure Estimates
HUD has developed a model for predicting where foreclosures are likely. That model estimates serious
delinquency rates using data on the leading causes of foreclosures - subprime loans (HMDA census Tract
data on high cost and highly leveraged loans), increasing unemployment (BLS data on unemployment rate
change), and fall in home values (FHFA data on house price change). The predicted serious delinquency rate
is then used to apportion the state total counts of foreclosure starts (from the Mortgage Bankers Association)
and REOs (from RealtyTrac) to individual block groups.
Total Housing Units to receive a mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 145
Percent of Housing Units with a high cost mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 37
Percent of Housing Units 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure: 21.9
Number of Foreclosure Starts in past year: 19
Number of Housing Units Real Estate Owned July 2009 to June 2010: 6
HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a
visible impact on the neighborhood. Nationwide there have been over 1.9 million foreclosure completions in
the past two years. NSP 1, 2, and 3 combined are estimated to only be able to address 100,000 to 120,000
foreclosures. To stabilize a neighborhood requires focused investment.
Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of REQ in past
year): 4
Supporting Data
Metropolitan Area (or non -metropolitan area balance) percent fall in home value since peak value (Federal
Housing Finance Agency Home Price Index through June 2010): -41.5
Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2005': 4
Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2010*: 11.9
"Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics
Market Ana!_.,�.ys s:
HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help inform the strategy
development. Some things to consider:
1. Persistent Unemployment, Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration
should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy.
2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of
falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment
assistance program may be an effective strategy.
3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of
a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition/land bank strategy with selected acquisition
rehab for rental or lease -purchase might be considered.
4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental
to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered.
5. Historically high cost rental market. Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies?
A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long-term affordable rental might be considered.
Latitude and tongitude of corner points
-80.246201 26.201076-80.240085 26.201115-80.239913 26.197900-80-244763 26.197822-80.245943
26.199421
213
a 9
Blocks Comprisin0 Target Neighborhood
120110601051000, 120110601051016, 120110601051015, 120110601051017, 120110601051999,
120110601051031, 120110601051030, 120110601051029, 120110601051028, 120110601051027,
1201106010510267
313
Z�X �
0
Project Name : Tamarac Lakes Sec 1
Neighborhood Block Group Block
Block Group g Housing Group
Housing Units Units Score
State LISPS HMDA
Min
120119109870675050202U2 105 247 20 17
Total Neighborhood Housing Units: 105
Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20.00
State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17
Tract Number
Tract NSP3 Need Score
State Minimum Qualifying NSP3 Score
HMDA Mortgages 2004 to 2007
Estimated Delinquent Mortgages (%)
Total USPS Residential Addresses
USPS Residential Addresses Vacant 90+ days
USPS Residential Addresses NoStat
NSP3 Options
18 Cumrrent Zoom Level
Show Tmc't"s' Outline (Zoom 11t)
omw
%qvx mim"
MEMO00UM Iff+ii i iW i IOH$
The N8103 mapping foal now provides a
summary NON score for all projects
drawer. Click on "View Projects", which
will list all of the projects (target areas)
that have data calculated. It shows the
NOP3 score for each target urge along with
the Wet estimated housing units in that
area. At the bottom of the list is a sam of
all housing units.in-all target snag and the
NSP3-score for all target areas drawn.
Grantees are advised to know their state
minimum and If the summary scone Is less
than the a" minimum the grantee
should delete, add, or revise target areas.
Note brat if you delete or add, the toot only
recalcuhrtes after you close tics' View
Projects" box and reopen It. "UD also
advises grantees to drink carefully about
the sine of their target areas In total. If
those target areas have a very large
number oft" housing units relative to
the dollars avallable, HUD will likely ask
that the grantee reduce the number andfor
sine of theirtarget areas.
You have $Mod In succesefully.
t prOSpitt R
a
NW4d11► a.
Click here for an Overview
12011050202
20
17
2202
19.8
4549
177
36
Map data 62013
267 129
EXHIBIT 1
ilk
Neighborhood ID: 1965423
NSP3 Planning Data
Grantee ID: 1230060E
Grantee State: FL
Grantee Name: TAMARAC
Grantee Address: 7525 NW 88 Avenue Tamarac FL 33321
Grantee Email: angelab@tamarac.org
Neighborhood Name: Tamarac Lakes Sec 1
Date:2013-01-22 00:00:00
NSP3-.-Score
The neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an
individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified target geography that is not less than
the lesser of 17 or the twentieth .percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a state's
twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If,
however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum
need of 15. If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the
Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified
neighborhood.
Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20
State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17
Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 105
Area Benefit Eligibility
Percent Persons Less than 120% AMI: 67.4
Percent Persons Less than 80% AMI: 33.5
Neighborhood Attributes (Estimates)
��i ��u+rrr^r r.ruu++ra��r n� � ■ r � �r.r.�r����
Vacancy Estimate
USPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of
whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that
neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a
very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem.
The USPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However,
it can also be an address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development,
and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are
NoStat). when using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified.
In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the
residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and USPS counts are substantially
different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For
example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the LISPS residential address count may
be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PG boxes it may have fewer
addresses than housing units.
USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood: 114
Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (USPS, March 2010): 4
Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010): 1
113 EXHIBIT J
a
Foreclosure Estimates
HUD has developed a model for predicting where foreclosures are likely. That model estimates serious
delinquency rates using data on the leading causes of foreclosures - subprime loans (HMDA Census Tract
data on high cost and highly leveraged loans), increasing unemployment (BLS data on unemployment rate
change), and fall in home values (FHFA data on house price change). The predicted serious delinquency rate
is then used to apportion the state total counts of foreclosure starts (from the Mortgage Bankers Association)
and REOs (from RealtyTrac) to individual block groups.
Total Housing Units to receive a mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 55
Percent of Housing Units with a high cost mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 34.7
Percent of Housing Units 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure: 19.8
Number of Foreclosure Starts in past year: 6
Number of Housing Units Real Estate Owned July 2009 to June 2010: 2
HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a
visible impact on the neighborhood. Nationwide there have been over 1.9 million foreclosure completions in
the past two years. NSP 1, 2, and 3 combined are estimated to only be able to address 100,000 to 120,000
foreclosures. To stabilize a neighborhood requires focused investment.
Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of REO in past
year): 1
Suppor___-ting Data
Metropolitan Area (or non -metropolitan area balance) percent fall in home value since peak value (Federal
Housing Finance Agency Home Price Index through June 2010): -41.5
Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2005": 4
Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2010`: 11.9
'Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics
Market Analvsis:
HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help -inform the strategy
development. Some things to consider:
1. Persistent Unemployment. Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration
should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy.
2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of
falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment
assistance program may be an effective strategy.
3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of
a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition/land bank strategy with selected acquisition
rehab for rental or lease -purchase might be considered.
4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental
to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered.
5. Historically high cost rental market. Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies?
A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long-term affordable rental might be considered.
Latitude and Longitude of corner points
Ili r rrrrru-rr. rr r r urrr ter.
-80.165852 26.184508-80.165777 26.182679.80.162945 26.182034-80.163041 26.184604
0
t
Blocks Comprising Target Neighborhood
120110502022023$120110502022022,120110502022021,120110502022020,