The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-2011-022Temp. Reso. # 11989 Page 1 of 3 02-07-11 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. R-2011-_a,- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA APPROVING THE FIRST SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ("CDBG") PROGRAM, FISCAL YEAR 2010/11 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN TENTH PROGRAM YEAR TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PLAN; AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR OR IN HER ABSENCE, THE VICE -MAYOR TO EXECUTE ANY NECESSARY DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS; AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM ROUND 3 (NSP3) ACTION PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ********** WHEREAS, the City of Tamarac ("City") is a Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG') entitlement community; and WHEREAS, in July 2010, the City received notification of an allocation through the CDBG Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 3 in the amount of $1,427,857.00, pursuant to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) 2008, as amended under the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protect Act 2010 from the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and WHEREAS, as a condition of receiving the allocation, the City must amend its CDBG Annual Action Plan in order to include the plan for the use of the allocation of the funds provided pursuant to the CDBG Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 3; and Temp. Reso. # 11989 Page 2 of 3 02-07-11 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has prepared the First Substantial Amendment to the CDBG Fiscal Year 2010 Annual Action Plan Tenth Program Year to provide for the use of the funds being provided to the City pursuant to the Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 3; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Director recommends approval of the First Substantial Amendment to the CDBG Fiscal Year 2010 Annual Action Plan Tenth Program Year to provide for Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 3 funds; WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that it is in the best interest of the public for the City of Tamarac to submit the First Substantial Amendment to the CDGB Fiscal Year 2010/11 Annual Action Plan Tenth Program year to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA that: Section 1: The City Commission of the City of Tamarac hereby approves the First Substantial Amendment to the CDBG Program Fiscal Year 2010/11 Annual Action Plan Tenth Program Year for the use of the funds allocated to the City of Tamarac for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program Round 3, as attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2: The Mayor, or in her absence, the Vice -Mayor, is hereby designated and authorized to execute any documents and certifications required the U.S. Department of Temp. Reso. # 11989 Page 3 of 3 02-07-11 Housing and Urban Development, and to do all things necessary and proper to carry out the term and conditions of said program. Section 3: All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 4: If any clause, section, other part or application of this Resolution is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, in part or application, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Resolution. Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THEPTY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA THIS 73 "�4DAY OF r , 2011. I IqCITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA ,�� of • • qqc% =� ES�PO_ BETH TALABISCO, MAYOR �g63 ' O. B. TALABISCO ATTE '�q�.....UN:�``\��. P. BUSHNELL col D. GLASSER s ' M. GOMEZ b. H. DRESSLER PETER RICHARDSON, CIVIC CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I Have approved this RESOLUTION as to form. YA4 )IVA- Z(z zf l CITY -ATTORNEY ` CITY OF TAMARAC FY 2010/2011 Annual Action Plan Substantial Amendment Neighborhood Stabilization Program 3 under the Dodd -Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Prepared by: City of Tamarac Community Development Department Housing Division 7525 NW 88t" Avenue Tamarac, FL 33321 www.tamarac.org February 2011 Neighborhood Stabilization Program 3 Application $114273857.00 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA 7525 NW 88 Avenue Tamarac, FL 33321 (954) 597-3510 Website: www.tamarac.orq City Manager: Michael C. Cernech Mayor Beth Flansbaum-Talabisco Vice Mayor Pamela Bushnell Commissioner Diane Glasser Commissioner Michelle Gomez Commissioner Harry Dressler PN NSP3 Grantee Information NSP3 Program Administrator Contact Information Name (Last, First) Bauldree, Angela Email Address an elab tamarac.or Phone Number 954-597-3539 Mailing Address 7525 NW 88 Avenue, Room 206, Tamarac, FL 33321 Areas of Greatest Need Map Submission The map generated at the HUD NSP3 Mapping Tool for Preparing Action Plan website is included as an attachment. Data Sources Used to Determine Areas of Greatest Need Describe the data sources used to determine the areas of greatest need. Response: The City of Tamarac's Community Development Department, Housing Division utilized the following data sources to assist with determining the areas of greatest need: ❖ NSP3 HUD User GIS Information by Census Tract ❖ NSP3 Mapping Tool HMDA Data by Census Tract CoreLogic Software ❖ South Florida Block Shopper Website Trulia.com Realtytrac.com ❖ The City's Foreclsoure Registration Program list Each data source was used to confirm where the areas of greatest need fell by layering the data and assessing income, mortgage, delinquencies and other pertinent data. In many cases, property addresses were duplicated across the different data sources and areas of concentration of distressed neighborhoods become easier to identify. GIS Mapping provided visual confirmation of concentration areas where NSP3 eligible properties were located. Data from CoreLogic (December 2010) identified over 3,200 properties that were in some stage of foreclosure city-wide. Additionally, over 800 properties within the City had outstanding Code violations and the overall condition of certain neighborhoods further confirmed that layering the data made for better decision making indentifying the areas of greatest need. The Code Compliance Division recently implemented a lien amnesty program which will be advertised and promoted more intensely within the areas of greatest need. With this, even properties not assisted with NSP3 funds will have an opportunity to bring their properties up to Code and improving the appreance of their home as well as the neighborhood they live in further fostering the neighborhood stabilization theme. According to HUD User's GIS Information by Census Tract data, all twelve census tracts within the City had a "need score" of 19 or higher exceeding the state's minimum need score of 17, with 20 being the hi hest score possible. Four of the census tracts had a delinquency rate of over 20%. However, since NSP3 requires an even smaller target area than that of NSP1, staff was tasked with gathering additional data that would allow the City to reduce the areas of greatest need to 2-3 neighborhoods. Additionally, the Dodd -Frank Act strongly encourages grantees to define the areas of greatest need small enough that the NSP3 investment impacts approximatley 20% of the areas defined. NSP3 funds will be utilized to acquire, rehabilitate and re -sell eligible properties within the areas of greatest need which are listed below. Staff will attempt to focus on one area of greatest need at a time with its initial allocation, and move to the other areas with program income as it is generated at the re -sale stage. The City of Tamarac's initial allocation will allow for assistance at approximately 6-10 properties. This number will depend on factors such: cost of acquisition, the discount offered by the seller, and severity of distress and rehabilitation costs required prior to re -sale. MARKET CONDITIONS - DATA: TRULIA.COM According to trulia.com, a real estate website recommended by HUD for the purpose of gathering NSP3 market information, the following information was available to evaluate the City's market conditions: The data from trulia.com represents sales between September - November 2010. Average Listing Price: $111,844.00 Median Sales Price: $ 62,500.00 Based on 416 home sales between Sept. -Nov. 2010 Decrease of 32.1 % compared to same period last yr. Average Price Per sgft: $ 61.00 Decrease of 47.4% compared to same period last yr. REALTYTRAC. COM Another website utilized to gather market conditions was RealtyTrac.com. The following data was provided: Foreclosure Status Distribution: Pre -Foreclosures = 28% of total properties in some stage of foreclosure. Auction = 38% of total properties in some stage of foreclosure. Bank Owned = 34% of total properties in some stage of foreclosure. "Highest Availibility" Estimated Market Value -Properties between $100-$200K. Foreclosures by Square Footage - Properties with less than 1,000 sqft. Foreclosures by Number of Bedrooms - Properties with 2 bedrooms. A Geographical Comparison by Realtytrac.com comparing County, State and National figures shows that Broward County has 40% of its units foreclosed upon compared to the State of Florida at 37% and the Nation of 20%. According to RealtyTrac.com, the average difference between average sales price and average foreclosure sales price is $48,464,00. 4 This information is consistant to what the City of Tamarac experienced under its NSP1 program. The following averages were experienced under the City's NSP1, as of September 2010: Average Contract Price: $111,914.00 Average Home Rehabilitation Amount: $ 37,925.52 NSP3 HUD User GIS Information by Tamarac Census Tract 204.06 20 17 1713 21.90% 0 2999 161 204.09 19 17 1355 16.30% 5306 191 1 204.10 19 17 1831 16.70% 5669 195 28 204.11 20 17 1606 18.50% 2922 45 0 502.02 20 17 2202 19.80% 4549 177 36 503.05 20 17 1884 20.40% 3920 155 11 601.05 20 17 1705 21.90% 3300 84 10 601.06 20 17 2207 23.00% 4380 245 24 601.07 20 17 711 19.30% 1790 83 2 601.09 19 17 745 1720% 1469 31 1 601.11 19 17 1633 16.50% 3125 60 1 601.12 20 17 1880 19.00% 3896 192 1 Since smaller areas of greatest need were encouraged, staff broke down the same data provided at the census tract level to smaller "areas of greatest need" at the neighborhood level. 5 L/etermination oT Areas OT ureatest Neea ana AppliCaDle i iers Describe how the areas of greatest need were established and whether a tiered approach is being utilized to determine the distribution of fundina. Response: In order to determine the City's "areas of greatest need", staff mapped foreclosures identified by CoreLogic, and layered data from other resources, to find the concentration of potential NSP3 eligible properties. The number of potential eligible properties increased substantially when the definition of "foreclosure" was expanded on by HUD to include properties that are: • 60 Days delinquent under Mortgage Bankers of America delinquency calculations and owner notified, • Property owner 90 days or more delinquent on tax payments, Foreclosure proceedings initiated or completed, Foreclosure proceedings complete, title transferred to intermediary that is NOT an NSP grantee, sub, contractor, developer, or end user. CoreLogic provided a report that shows all properties within Tamarac that are in some stage of foreclosure, from a Lis Pendis to Real Estate Owned (REO). Staff ran this report as late as December 2010 which resulted in over 3,200 properties. Additionally, data from South Florida Block Shopper and an internal Foreclosure Registration program were mapped and used to identify neighborhoods with a concentration of foreclosures. Under the NSP3 program, only single-family properties will be considered. With these combined factors, staff was able to identify at least six "areas of greatest need" on which to obtain pertinent data in order to narrow down the number of areas of greatest need to three. Data from HUD User (NSP3) Mapping further assisted with the gathering of information such as need scores, vacancy rates, high cost mortgages, and market analysis. Once the data for the potential six areas of greatest need was obtained, the City was able to narrow the number down to three areas of greatest need. The City chose to identify three potential areas for the following reasons: • The Neighborhood NSP3 Score for all three areas is 20, the highest possible score. • All three neighborhoods had over 50% of the population at less than 120% AMI. • The percentage of delinquencies was high in each area. • A high number of homeowners had high cost mortgages. • Excessive deteriorating Code conditions and violations were concentrated in the three areas. The Citv's areas of greatest need are as follows: 1) Sunflower (Central area) Project Summary with map - Exhibit A NSP3 Planning Data (HUD User) - Exhibit B 2) Tamarac takes North (South of Prospect Rd) Project Summary with map - Exhibit C NSP3 Planning Data (HUD User) - Exhibits D 3) Mainlands Section 7 Project Summary with map - Exhibit E NSP3 Planning Data (HUD User) - Exhibits F The areas of greatest need listed above were identified based on the following information provided by HUD User: NSP3 Areas of Greatest Need Data Need Score 20 20 20 State Minimum 17 17 17 Total Housing Units 28 80 66 # of Units to make 20% Impact 6 16 13 Persons Less than 120% AMI 55.1 % 70.5% 84.1 % Persons Less than 80% AMI 28.8% 40.1 % 66.3% 04-07 HMDA Mt s 37 34.7 31 Deli % 90 + days) 21.9% 19.8% 19.3% USPS Resid. Addresses 29 86 66 USPS 90+ Days Vacant 2 3 3 USPS Resid. Addresses No Stat 0 1 0 Census Tract 204.06 502.02 601.07 A map of each area of greatest need was created in HUD's NSP3 mapping tool and submitted electronically. HUD responded with data pertinent to the specified boundaries and associated census tract information. This data showed the total number of units within the defined area allowing the City to determine how many units were necessary to reach the intended goal of 20% impact per area of greatest need. Due to the lag time between the submission of this application and the grant funding agreement, the priority to which area will be targeted first will be determined once the grant funding agreement is executed. Between December 2010 when the data was obtained and the date of exeecution of the grant funding agreement, the number and location of eligible properties will change effecting which area the City begins its acquisition. Since the activities proposed result in Program Income as a result of the re -sale of the 6-10 initial acquired and rehabilitated properties, the program income will be utilized to continue the same activity creatina areater neiahborhood stabilization. Definitions and Descriptions Definitions Term Definition Blighted Structure A structure is blighted when it exhibits objectively determinable signs of deterioration sufficient to constitute a threat to human health, safety, and public welfare. Properties identified for demolition will meet one or more of the following criteria as a blighted structure: 1. Building Deterioration 2. Site Deterioration or site deficiencies 3. Unsanitary and unsafe conditions and incompatible uses 4. Six or more ownership parcels per block 5. Buildings greater than 40 years of age 6. Presence of closed/vacant buildings 7. Presence of vacant lots 8. Buildings in violation of property maintenance code violations 9. Presence of buildings scheduled for demolition Affordable Rents Those requiring not more than 30 percent of an income cut-off defined in relation to Low -Moderate Area Median Income (AMI). Descriptions Term Definition Long -Term Under its NSP3 Program the City will follow HOME Affordability Affordability Terms for its soft -seconds in the form of a Deed Restriction. For any down payment assistance offered utilizing SHIP or HOME funds the City will implement the affordability terms associated with that program. With extensive affordability time frames, recipients are encouraged to remain in their property to keep from repaying the loan, Should the property change ownership during the affordability terms, the City would recapture the balance due allowing the funds to go back into the program and assist another homebuyer. Should leveraging be utilized for Down Payment Assistance or closing costs, the affordability terms described within that funding sources agreement will be implemented. If HOME funds are utilized, HOME Affordability terms will be applied. Housing Rehabilitation Standards All housing rehabilitation work will follow Broward County Housing Standards, and Florida Building Code as well as City Code. Home Rehabilitation work specifications include such health and safety items as, roof repair and replacement, repair to exterior walls and stucco, repair or replacement of unsafe electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems, removal of lead and asbestos, and installation of impact resistant windows or storm shutters. All replacement of appliances will incorporate the installation of energy star rated systems where applicable. Law -Income Targeting Low -Income Set -Aside Amount Enter the low-income set -aside percentage in the first field. The field for total funds set aside will populate based on the percentage entered in the first field and the total NSP3 grant. Identify the estimated amount of funds appropriated or otherwise made available under the NSP3 to be used to provide housing for individuals or families whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of area median income. Response: Total low-income set -aside percentage (must be no less than 25 percent): 25.00% Total funds set aside for low-income individuals = $325,000.00 Low -Income Ta Provide a summary that describes the manner in which the low-income targeting goals will be met. Response: The City will conduct an Open Enrollment to collect applications from families/households interested in the program. Applications will identify household income, family size, first mortgage maximum, and other factors necessary to determine their housing needs. The City may supplement families/households under the 50% AMI level by offering Second Mortgages utilizing other funding sources such as SHIP or HOME, or providing a soft -second. A second mortgage provided by the City will reduce the first mortgage loan amount, helping to lower the households monthly housing payment. Part of the City's eligibility requirement is that front end ratios may not exceed 35% of a households monthly income. This 35% front-end ratio consists of mortgage principal, taxes, insurance and any homeowners association fees, if applicable. Under NSP1, the City utilized the Financing Mechanisms activity and provided Down Payment Assistance to income eligible buyers. During the course of the two Open Enrollments, the City took in over 300 applications, all pre -qualified with a lender. Of the 300, over 250 were certified as income eligible and given 30-90 days to secure a contract on a home. Of the 250 applicants several unforeseen circumstances arose such as; job loss, the addition or reduction in the number of household members, health and medical changes as well as credit challenges. The City assisted 53 households in the purchase of a new home. Of the 53 households assisted under NSP1 16, or 30%, were below 50% AMI. Acquisition and Relocation Demolition or Conversion of LMI Units Does the grantee intend to demolish or convert any low- and moderate - income dwelling units i.e., 5 80% of area median income)? No If yes, fill in the table below. Question Number of Units The number of low- and moderate -income dwelling units—i.e., 5 80% of area median income —reasonably expected to be demolished or converted as a direct result of NSP-assisted activities. The number of NSP affordable housing units made available to low-, moderate-, and middle -income households—i.e., :5 120% of area median income —reasonably expected to be produced by activity and income level as provided for in DRGR, by each NSP activity providing such housing (including a proposed time schedule for commencement and completion). The number of dwelling units reasonably expected to be made available for households whose income does not exceed 50 percent of area median income. Public Comment unizen earticipation Tian Briefly describe how the grantee followed its citizen participation plan regarding this proposed substantial amendment or abbreviated plan. Response: As required by the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd -Frank Act), the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development and the City's Citizen Participation 10 Plan (available upon request), a 15 day Public Review period was held from February 8, 2011 to February 22, 2011. comments were received during the 15 day public review period. A Public Hearing was opened during the February 23, 2011 City Commission meeting. comments were received during the public hearing. In addition to the Public Review period and Public Hearing, staff created an NSP3 Focus Group which consisted of eight local professionals with expertise in affordable housing, lending and real estate. The Focus Group met on January 13, 2011 and discussed the various requirements as well as obstacles the City needs to consider when preparing its NSP3 Action Plan. Input/ideas generated from the Focus Group were: • The City should evaluate the financial situation of the Homeowners Association when buying in areas with an HOA to be sure the HOA is stable. • The City may want to offer penalties or incentives to home rehabilitation contractors with regard to the timeliness of completing the rehabilitation work to reduce the length of time the City owns the property resulting in additional carrying costs. • Look into the Home Path program to see if it works with the City's NSP3 Program. • Down Payment Assistance will be necessary for many buyers, even if just for the closing costs, therefore, the City needs to make funds available from its HOME or SHIP funds. • Keep local lenders and realtors informed as to Open Enrollment dates and deadlines to allow them to assist with finding buyers or offering mortgages that compliment the program. Presentations to the Mayor and City Commission, as well as the City's Executive Team were also conducted to generate input. The City's Housing and Neighborhood Programs Manager met with a local non-profit agency currently administering the NSP1 and NSP2 funds for other local municipalities to discuss the City's Plan and options. The discussion included administrative capacity as well as activity design. Due to the high dollar amount associated with "developer fees", the City chose to retain the NSP3 Program in-house as it did under NSP1. Summary of Public Comments Received. The summary of public comments received is included as an attachment. NSP Information by Activity Enter each activity name and fill in the corresponding information. If you have fewer than seven activities, please delete any extra activity fields. (For example, if you have three activities, you should delete the tables labeled "Activity Number 4," "Activity Number 5," "Activity Number 6," and "Activity Number 7." If you are unsure how to delete a table, see the instructions above. The field labeled "Total Budget for Activity" will populate based on the figures entered in the fields above it. 11 Consult the i Program Desk.... Guidebook for guidance on completing the "Performance Design_Guidebook Measures" component of the activity tables below. Single Family Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re -sale - LH25 Select all that apply: � I 1 I Eliaible Use A: Financing Mechanisms Eligible Use B: Acquisition and Rehabilitation Eli ible Use C: Land Banking Eligible Use D: Demolition Eligible Use E: Redevelopment 24CFR 570.201(a) and (b), 570.202 (a)1 ku'; i 111�111,1 I Low -Income Housing to Meet 25% Set -Aside (LH25) Activity Description: The City will acquire single-family, NSP eligible residential properties located in the designated areas of greatest need for the purpose of rehabilitation and re -sale to income eligible homebuyers. All properties will be brought up to code, ensure health and safety within the property and improve the properties energy efficiency prior to re -sale. Affordability restrictions will be placed on each property in the form of either a deferred loan as a result of down payment assistance (second mortgage with recapture terms) or a soft -second, in the form of a deed restriction on the property. The terms for continued affordability will depend on the amount of assistance provided, however, at a minimum the City will implement its terms based on the HOME Programs affordability periods. All contractors and consultants have participated in local contractor training informing them of the City's vicinity hiring preference and Section 3 hiring if possible. In this economy many of the City's contractors have been reducing their crews, however, will implement these programs if applicable. Additionally, proper purchasing procedures have been followed with regard to consultants, general contractors or other professionals required to carry out NSP3 activities. Market Factors: Although the City utilized several data sources to locate "current" eligible properties to identify the areas of greatest need, the constantly changing influx and sale of foreclosures will alter the data from one month to another. The City will continually run data reports identifying the "current" eligible properties to ensure there is still high volume in the defined areas. Capacity: The City's Housing Division successfully administered its NSP1 Proaram in-house and intends to do the same under NSP3. With a 12 smaller allocation and longer expenditure deadlines, the City does not anticipate a problem meeting the requirements and obligations of NSP3. In addition to the Housing staff, partnerships within the agency and outside have been formed to ensure a successful NSP3 Program. Program Income: Program Income generated from the sale of a property will be allocated back into the activity to assist with another property. Once the Program Income becomes too minimal to assist with a property, it will be combined with Program Income generated from Activity 2, or the City will seek guidance from HUD as to how to utilize the remaining funds. This activity will be carried out in the areas of greatest need as follows: 1) Sunflower 2) Tamarac Lakes North 3) Mainlands Section 7 NSP3 $$325,000.00 Other funding source $$0.00 (Other funding source $$0.00 Utilizing our expereince under NSP1, the average investment per property (acquisition, rehabilitation, and direct costs) was approximately $120,000.00. Expected number of units with initial allocation: THREE UNITS Upon receipt of program income from the re -sale of the initital properties, additional properties will be assisted. The goal of this activity is to increase property values, decrease the number of abandoned and foreclosed properties within the designated target areas as well as build wealth through homeownersip for the City's NSP3 homebuyers. The following chart shows the City's expected goals, outputs and outcomes: Goal Attract new homeowners to the City Improve property values A minimum of 3 properties Acquired/Rehabilitated and Re -Sold to income eligible homebuyers Outcome Increased level of homeownership Increase average sales Increased assessed price valuations 13 14 Single Family Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re -sale - LMMI Select all that apply: ❑ Eligible Use A: Financing Mechanisms ® Eligible Use B: Acquisition and Rehabilitation ❑ Eligible Use C: Land Banking ❑ I Eligible Use D: Demolition I-1 I Eliaible Use E: Redevelopment 24CFR 570.201(a) and (b), 570.202 (a)1 Low Moderate Middle Income Housina (LMMH Activity Description: The City will acquire single-family, NSP eligible residential properties located in the designated areas of greatest need for the purpose of rehabilitation and re -sale to income eligible homebuyers. All properties will be brought up to code, ensure health and safety within the property and improve the properties energy efficiency prior to re -sale. Affordability restrictions will be placed on each property in the form of either a deferred loan as a result of down payment assistance (second mortgage with recapture terms) or a soft -second, in the form of a deed restriction on the property. The terms for continued affordability will depend on the amount of assistance provided, however, at a minimum the City will implement its terms based on the HOME Programs affordability periods. All contractors and consultants have participated in local contractor training informing them of the City's vicinity hiring preference and Section 3 hiring if possible. In this economy many of the City's contractors have been reducing their crews, however, will implement these programs if applicable. Additionally, proper purchasing procedures have been followed with regard to consultants, general contractors or other professionals required to carry out NSP3 activities. Market Factors: Although the City utilized several data sources to locate "current" eligible properties to identify the areas of greatest need, the constantly changing influx and sale of foreclosures will alter the data from one month to another. The City will continually run data reports identifying the "current" eligible properties to ensure there is still high volume in the defined areas. Capacity: The City's Housing Division successfully administered its NSP1 Program in-house and intends to do the same under NSP3. With a smaller allocation and longer expenditure deadlines, the City does not anticipate a problem meeting the requirements and obligations of NSP3. In addition to the Housing staff, partnerships within the agency and outside have been formed to ensure a successful NSP3 Program. 15 Program Income: ;I,iI,,G ,,.I ,wli G" a Program Income generated from the sale of a property will be allocated �',I�a��,�Il';�a��'iupud,GG,aw�Ilij"!��°IGI'��I�,iu��i back into the activity to assist with another property. Once the Program Y p p Y� 9 u q Income becomes too minimal to assist with a property, it will be v7 r Ilb�i �''.IP °I combined with Program Income generated from Activity 2 or staff will 4' , seek guidance from HUD as to how to utilize the remaining funds. This activity will be carried out in the areas of greatest need as follows: Y rr�'' Nry 1) Sunflower I�� )Hm Gd�IIIII�I�II ,II'IIPf� 2) Tamarac Lakes North �IIIIIy ".,.0 �9111i L., 3) Mainlands Section 7 NSP3 $$960,072.00 (Other funding source) $$0.00 (Other funding source) $$0.00 $960, 072.00 Utilizing our experience under NSP1, the average investment per property (acquisition, rehabilitation, and direct costs) was approximately $120,000.00. Expected number of units with initial allocation: SEVEN UNITS Upon receipt of program income from the re -sale of the initital properties, additional properties will be assisted. The goal of this activity is to increase property values, decrease the number of abandoned and foreclosed properties within the designated target areas as well as build wealth through homeownersip for the City's NSP3 homebuyers. The following chart shows the City's expected goals, outputs and outcomes: Goal Attract new homeowners to the City Improve property values Decrease number of abandoned/foreclosed properties in designated target areas Output 6-8 properties Acquired/Rehabilitate d and Re -Sold to income eligible homebuyers Increase average sales price 6-8 Properties no longer vacant Outcome Increased level of homeownership Increased assessed valuations Stabilization of Neighborhood 16 NSP3 PROGRAM BUDGET RECAP Allocation: $ 1,427,857.00 Actyity Single -Family Acquisition/Rehabilitation/Re-Sale - LH25 $ 325,000.00 Single Family Acquisition/Rehabilitation/Re-Sale - LMMI $ 960,072.00 Program Administration $ 142,785.00 17 Certifications Certifications for State and Entitlement Communities (1) Affirmatively furthering fair housing. The jurisdiction certifies that it will affirmatively further fair housing, which means that it will conduct an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within the jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting the analysis and actions in this regard. (2) Anti -displacement and relocation plan. The applicant certifies that it has in effect and is following a residential anti -displacement and relocation assistance plan. (3) Anti -lobbying. The jurisdiction must submit a certification with regard to compliance with restrictions on lobbying required by 24 CFR part 87, together with disclosure forms, if required by that part. (4) Authority of jurisdiction. The jurisdiction certifies that the consolidated plan or abbreviated plan, as applicable, is authorized under state and local law (as applicable) and that the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations and other program requirements. (5) Consistency with plan. The jurisdiction certifies that the housing activities to be undertaken with NSP funds are consistent with its consolidated plan or abbreviated plan, as applicable. (6) Acquisition and relocation. The jurisdiction certifies that it will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601), and implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 24, except as those provisions are modified by the notice for the NSP program published by HUD. (7) Section 3. The jurisdiction certifies that it will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701 u), and implementing regulations at 24 CFR part 135. (8) Citizen participation. The jurisdiction certifies that it is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation plan that satisfies the requirements of Sections 24 CFR 91.105 or 91.115, as modified by NSP requirements. (9) Following a plan. The jurisdiction certifies it is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. [Only States and entitlement jurisdictions use this certification.] (10) Use of funds. The jurisdiction certifies that it will comply with the Dodd -Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Title XII of Division A of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 by spending 50 percent of its grant funds within 2 years, and spending 100 percent within 3 years, of receipt of the grant. (11) The jurisdiction certifies: a. that all of the NSP funds made available to it will be used with respect to individuals and families whose incomes do not exceed 120 percent of area median income; and 18 b. The jurisdiction will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted with CDBG funds, including Section 108 loan guaranteed funds, by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of low- and moderate - income, including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access to such public improvements. However, if NSP funds are used to pay the proportion of a fee or assessment attributable to the capital costs of public improvements (assisted in part with NSP funds) financed from other revenue sources, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDBG funds. In addition, with respect to properties owned and occupied by moderate -income (but not low-income) families, an assessment or charge may be made against the property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than NSP funds if the jurisdiction certifies that it lacks NSP or CDBG funds to cover the assessment. (12) Excessive force. The jurisdiction certifies that it has adopted and is enforcing: a. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and b. A policy of enforcing applicable state and local laws against physically barring entrance to, or exit from, a facility or location that is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. The City does not have its own Police Department, however, does contract with Broward Sheriffs Office for services covering any police activity needed, including excessive force. (13) Compliance with anti -discrimination laws. The jurisdiction certifies that the NSP grant will be conducted and administered in conformity with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-3619), and implementing regulations. (14) Compliance with lead -based paint procedures. The jurisdiction certifies that its activities concerning lead -based paint will comply with the requirements of part 35, subparts A, B, J, K, and R of this title. (15) Compliance with laws. The jurisdiction certifies that it will comply with applicable laws. (16) Vicinity hiring. The jurisdiction certifies that it will, to the maximum extent feasible, provide for hiring of employees that reside in the vicinity of NSP3 funded projects or contract with small businesses that are owned and operated by persons residing in the vicinity of NSP3 projects. (17) Development of affordable rental housing. The jurisdiction certifies that it will be abide by the procedures described in its NSP3 Abbreviated Plan to create preferences for the development of affordable rental housing for properties assisted with NSP3 funds. Fnr �J ichael C. Cernech, City Manager Date �3 ;L �. 19 Appendix: NSP3 Action Plan Contents Checklist The checklist below is an optional tool for NSP3 grantees to help to ensure that all required elements of the NSP3 Substantial Amendment or the Abbreviated Plan are submitted to HUD. This checklist only includes the minimum required elements that must be included in the NSP3 Action Plan and grantees may want to add additional details. This document must be protected, as described above, in order to use the checkboxes in this checklist. I. NSP3 Grantee Information Did you include the Program Administrator's name, address, phone, and email address? 2. Areas of Greatest Need Does the narrative description describe how funds will give _priority emphasis to areas of reatest need? — Does the narrative description specifically address how the funds will give priority emphasis to those areas: • With the highest percentage of home foreclosures? • With the highest percentage of homes financed by subprime mortgage related loan?; and • Identified by the grantee as likely to face a significant rise in the rate of home foreclosures? ..-............ _.._ ................................-- __............................... --- Did you create the area of greatest needs map at http:/twww.huduser.orgiNSP/NSP3.htmi? Did you include the map as an attachment to your Action Plan? ONLYApplicable for States: Did you include the needs of all ❑ entitlement communities in the State? N/A 3. Definitions and Descriptions Are the following definitions and topics included in your substantial amendment?: • Blighted structure in context of state or local law, • Affordable rents, • Ensuring long term affordability for all NSP funded 20 housing projects, • Applicable housing rehabilitation standards for NSP funded projects 4. Low -Income Targeting Did you identify the estimated amount of funds appropriated to provide housing that meets the low-income set aside target? Did you provide a summary describing how your jurisdiction will meet its low-income set aside goals? 5. Acquisition & Relocation For all acquisitions that will result in displacement did you specify; The City will not purchase occupied properties. ❑ • The planned activity, N/A • The number of units that will result in displacement, El N/A • The manner in which the grantee will comply with URA ❑ for those residents? N/A 6. Public Comment 7. NSP Information by Activity 21 8. Certifications Did you sign and submit the certification form applicable to vour iurisdiction? 9. Additional Documentation 22 OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 version 02 *1. Type of Submission: *2. Type of Application • If Revision, select appropriate Ietter(s) ❑ Preapplication ® New Application ❑ Continuation *Other (Specify) ❑ Changed/Corrected Application ❑ Revision 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier: 5a, Federal Entity Identifier: *5b. Federal Award Identifier: State Use Only: 6. Date Received by State: :17, State Application Identifier: 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: *a. Legal Name: City of Tamarac, FL *b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): *c. Organizational DUNS: 59-1039552 077270940 d. Address: *Street 1: 7525 NW 88 Avenue Street 2: *City: Tamarac County: Broward *State: Florida Province: *Country: United States *Zip / Postal Code 33321 e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: City Manager's Office Division Name: Community Development Department f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application: Prefix: Mr. *First Name: Michael Middle Name: C. *Last Name: Cernech Suffix: Title: City Manager Organizational Affiliation: *Telephone Number: 954-597-3530 Fax ►number: 954-597-3540 *Email: michaelc@tamaraC.Org OMB Number: 4040-0004 Expiration Date; 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 version 02 *9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type: City or Township Government Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type: Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type: 'Other (Specify) *10 Name of Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 14.218 CFDA Title: Neighborhood Stabilization Program 3 *12 Funding Opportunity Number: *Title: 13. Competition Identification Number: Title: 14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): Areas of Greatest Need within the City of Tamarac: Area within Sunflower Community Area within Tamarac Lakes North Area within Mainlands Section 7 *15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project: Single -Family Acquisition/Rehabilitation of eligible foreclosed properties. OMB Number: 4040.0004 Expiration Date: 01/31/2009 Application for Federal Assistance SF-424 version 02 16. Congressional Districts Of: *a. Applicant: 19, 20, 23 *b. Program/Project, 19, 20, 23 17. Proposed Project: "a. Start Date: Date of Execution of Agreement *b. End Hate: 3 Years Later 18. Estimated Funding ($): *a, Federal 1,427,857.00 *b. Applicant *c. State *d. Local "e. Other *f. Program Income *g. TOTAL 1,427,857.00 *19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? ❑ a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on ❑ b. Program is subject to E.Q. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. ® c. Program is not covered by E. O. 12372 *20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes", provide explanation.) ❑ Yes IM No 21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications" and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. i also provide the required assurances" and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U. S, Code, Title 218, Section 1001) m **I AGREE ` `* The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions Authorized Representative: Prefix: Mr. "First Name: Michael Middle Name: C. *Last Name: Cernech Suffix: *Title: City Manager "Telephone Number: 954-597-3530 Fax Dumber: 954-597-3540 * Email, michaelc@tamarac.org --- �� *Signature of Authorized Representa ' _ ate Signed: Authorized for Local Reproduction �'H Standard Form 424 (Revised 10/2005) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 Ali Project Name : Sunflower Bloch Block'Group Neighborhood Block Group Group State USPS HMDA Housing Units Housing Units score Min 120119205470675020406U1 28 1370 20 17 1429 816 Total Neighborhood Housing Units: 28 Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20.00 State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17 Tract Number Tract NSP3 Need Score State Minimum Qualifying NSP3 Score HMDA Mortgages 2004 to 2007 Estimated Delinquent Mortgages Total USPS Residential Addresses USPS Residential Addresses Vacant 90+ days USPS Residential Addresses NoStat NSP3 Options 17 Current Zoom Level F! Show Traces Outline (Zoom 11+) ........::"'"wr lip The NSP3 mapping tool now provides a summary NSP3 score for all pw acts drawn. Click on "View Projects which will list all of the projects (target areas) that have data calculated. It shown the NSP3 snore Poreaah target area along with the total ertlmated housing unha In that area, At the bottom of the list is a sum of all housing units In all target areas and the NSP3 score Wall target oleos drawn. Rlanteas are advised to know their state minimum and If the summary score is less then the state minimum the grantee should delete, add, or revive target areas, Nola that if you delete or add, the tool only recalculates after you close the View Projects" box and reopen it. HUD atso advises grantees to think carefully about the Giza, of their target areas In total, if those target areas have a very large number of tour housing units rakilve to the dollars avallable, HUD will likely ask that the grantee reduce the number arWlor size of their target areas. Click here for an Ovorview EXHIBIT A 12011020406 20 17 1713 21.9 2999 161 27 Neighborhood ID: 5294281 NSP3 Planning Data Grantee ID: 1230080E Grantee State: FL Grantee Name: TAMARAC Grantee Address: 7525 NW 88 Avenue Tamarac FL 33321 Grantee Email: angelab@tamarac_org Neighborhood Name: Sunflower -Revised 2 Date:2011 -02-01 00:00:00 NSP3 Score The neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified target geography that is not less than the lesser of 17 or the twentieth percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If, however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum need of 15. If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified neighborhood. Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20 State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17 Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 28 Area Benefit Eligibility Percent Persons Less than 120% AMI: 55.1 Percent Persons Less than 80% AML 28.8 Neighborhood Attributes (Estimates) Vacancy Estimate LISPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem. The USPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However, it can also be an address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development, and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are NoStat). When using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified. In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and USPS counts are substantially different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the USPS residential address count may be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PO boxes it may have fewer addresses than housing units. USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood: 29 Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (USPS, March 2010): 2 Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010). 0 EXHIBIT B Foreclosure Estimates HUD has developed a model for predicting where foreclosures are likely. That model estimates serious delinquency rates using data on the leading causes of foreclosures - subprime loans (HMDA Census Tract data on high cost and highly leveraged loans), increasing unemployment (BLS data on unemployment rate change), and fall in home values (FHFA data on house price change). The predicted serious delinquency rate is then used to apportion the state total counts of foreclosure starts (from the Mortgage Bankers Association) and REOs (from RealtyTrac) to individual block groups. Total Housing Units to receive a mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 17 Percent of Housing Units with a high cost mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 37 Percent of Housing Units 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure: 21.9 Number of Foreclosure Starts in past year: 2 - Number of Housing Units Real Estate Owned July 2009 to June 2010: 1 HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a visible impact on the neighborhood. Nationwide there have been over 1.9 million foreclosure completions in the past two years. NSP 1, 2, and 3 combined are estimated to only be able to address 100,000 to 120,000 foreclosures. To stabilize a neighborhood requires focused investment. Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of REO in past year): 0 Supporting Data Metropolitan Area (or non -metropolitan area balance) percent fall in home value since peak value (Federal Housing Finance Agency Home Price Index through June 2010): -41.5 Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2005': 4 Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2010*: 11.9 'Bureau of Labor Statistics. Local Area Unemployment Statistics Market Analysts: HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help inform the strategy development. Some things to consider: 1. Persistent Unemployment. Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy. 2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment assistance program may be an effective strategy. 3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition/land bank strategy with selected acquisition rehab for rental or lease -purchase might be considered. 4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered. 5. Historically high cost rental market. Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies? A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long-term affordable rental might be considered. Latitude and Longitude of corner points -80.248250 26,225842-80.247445 26.225996-80.246522 26.225746-80.245761 26.225169-80,245332 26.224274-80.245256 26.223369-80.245450 26.222705-80.248529 26.222378-80.248636 26.225621 Blocks Comprising Target Neighborhood 120110204061005, i Project Name : Tamarac Lakes North (Southside) Block Block Group Neighborhood Black Group Group State uSPS HMDA f Housing Units Housing Units Score Min 120119109870675050202U4 80 333 20 17 360 174 Total Neighborhood Housing Units: 80 Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20.00 State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17 Tract Number 12011050202 Tract NSP3 Need Score 20 State Minimum Qualifying NSP3 Score 17 HMDA Mortgages 2004 to 2007 2202 1 Estimated Delinquent Mortgages (°/D) 19.8 Total USPS Residentiai Addresses 4549 USPS Residential Addresses Vacant 90+ days 177 USPS Residential Addresses NoStat 36 NSP3 Options 18 CunehtZoom Level Show Tracts Outline (Zoom 11+) :i lwtliFk`1tfF,'.� 5..., The NSP3 mapping tool now provides a summary NSP3 score for all projects drawn. Click on "View Projacla", which will list all ofthe projects (target areas) that have data calculated. It shows the NSPS score for each target area along with tha total estimated housing units In that ■rem. At the bottom of the list is a sum of all housing units In all target areas and the NSP3 score for all target areas drawn. Grantees are advised to know their state minimum and if the summary score is less than the state minimum the grabble should delete, add, or revise target areas. Note that it you delete or add, the tool only recalculates after you close the "View Projects' box and reopen It. HUD also advises grantees to think carefully about the size of their target areas in total. if those target areas have a very large number of total housing units relative to the dollars evalb ble, HUD will likely ask that the grantee reduce the number andfor size of their target areas. Click here for an Overview EXHIBIT C Neighborhood ID: 6879058 NSP3 Planning Data Grantee ID: 1230050E Grantee State: FL Grantee Name: TAMARAC Grantee Address: 7525 NW 88 Avenue Tamarac FL 33321 Grantee Email: angeiab@tamarac.org Neighborhood Name: Tamarac lakes North (southside) Revised 3 Date:2011-02-01 00:00:00 NSP3 Score The neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified target geography that is not less than the lesser of 17 or the twentieth percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If, however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum need of 15. If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified neighborhood. Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20 State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17 Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 80 Area Benefit Eligibility Percent Persons Less than 120% AMI: 70.5 Percent Persons Less than 80% AMI: 40.1 Neighborhood Attributes (Estimates)_ Vacancy Estimate USPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem. The LISPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However, it can also bean address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development, and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are NoStat). When using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified. In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and USPS counts are substantially different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the USPS residential address count may be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PO boxes it may have fewer addresses than housing units. USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood. 86 Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (USPS, March 2010): 3 Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010): 1 EXHIBIT D Foreclosure Estimates HUD has developed a model for predicting where foreclosures are likely. That model estimates serious delinquency rates using data on the leading causes of foreclosures - subprime loans (HMDA Census Tract data on high cost and highly leveraged loans), increasing unemployment (BLS data on unemployment rate change), and fall in home values (FHFA data on house price change). The predicted serious delinquency rate is then used to apportion the state total counts of foreclosure starts (from the Mortgage Bankers Association) and REOs (from RealtyTrac) to individual block groups. Total Housing Units to receive a mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 42 Percent of Housing Units with a high cost mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 34.7 Percent of Housing Units 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure: 19.8 Number of Foreclosure Starts in past year: 5 Number of Housing Units Real Estate Owned July 2009 to June 2010: 1 HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a visible impact on the neighborhood. Nationwide there have been over 1.9 million foreclosure completions in the past two years. NSP 1, 2, and 3 combined are estimated to only be able to address 100,000 to 120,000 foreclosures. To stabilize a neighborhood requires focused investment. Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of REO in past year): 1 Supporting Data Metropolitan Area (or non -metropolitan area balance) percent fall in home value since peak value (Federal Housing Finance Agency Home Price Index through June 2010): -41.5 Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2005': 4 Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2010": 11.9 'Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics Market Analysis: HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help inform the strategy development. Some things to consider: 1. Persistent Unemployment. Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy. 2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment assistance program may be an effective strategy. 3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition/land bank strategy with selected acquisition rehab for rental or lease -purchase might be considered. 4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered. 5. Historically nigh cost rental market. Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies? A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long-term affordable rental might be considered. Latitude and Longitude of corner Qoints -80.180862 26,191421-80.180840 26.189457-80.179231 26.189495-80,179274 26.191449-80.180776 26.191392 Blocks Comprising Target Neighborhood 120110502024023,120110502024027,120110502024026,120110502024025, Project Name : Mainlands Section 7 Block Block Group Neighborhood Block Group Group State LISPS HMDA Housing Units Housing Units Score Min 120119275670675060107U1 66 1538 20 17 1538 611 Total Neighborhood Housing Units: 66 Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20.00 State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17 Tract Number 12011060107 Tract NSP3 Need Score 20 State Minimum Qualifying NSP3 Score 17. HMDA Mortgages 2004 to 2007 711 Estimated Delinquent Mortgages (%} 19.3 Total USPS Residential Addresses 1790 LISPS Residential Addresses Vacant 90+ days 83 LISPS Residential Addresses NoStat 2 NSP3 Options 18 Current Zoom Level Show Tracts Outline (Zoom 11+) � -�.�- �gRlt9v'.�. �• { i'� . 5ttw�4ti .. VIEW A.....,ttI f.L7EWA��IO�.CrT'1�?I .:��NprlOtUiih � ,y;lrygltp61C1t[3165; The NSP3 mapping tool now provides s summary NSP3 score for all projects drawn, Click on "View Projects", which will list all of the projects (target areas) that have data calculated. It shows the NSP3 score for each target area along with the total estimated housing units Irk that area. At the bottom of the list is a sum of all housing units In all target areas and the N81`3 scare far all target areas drawn. Urerdess are advised to know their state Writ num and Irthe summary score is tees than the state minimum the grantee should delete, add, or revise target areas. Note that If you delete or add, the tool only recalculates after you close the "view Pfojecla" box and reopen It. HUD also advises grantees to think carefully about the size of their target areas In total. If thus target Areas have a very large number of total housing units relativa to the dollars available, HUD will likely ask that the grantee reduce the number andlor size of their target areas. Glick ham for an Overview EXHIBIT E Neighborhood ID: 6930969 NSP3 Planning Data Grantee ID: 1230060E Grantee State: FL Grantee Name: TAMARAC Grantee Address: 7525 NW 88 Avenue Tamarac FL 33321 Grantee Email: angelab@tamarac.org Neighborhood Name: Mainlands Section 7 Date:2011-01-18 00:00:00 NSP3 Score The neighborhoods identified by the NSP3 grantee as being the areas of greatest need must have an individual or average combined index score for the grantee's identified target geography that is not less than the lesser of 17 or the twentieth percentile most needy score in an individual state. For example, if a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 18, the requirement will be a minimum need of 17. If, however, a state's twentieth percentile most needy census tract is 15, the requirement will be a minimum need of 15. If more than one neighborhood is identified in the Action Plan, HUD will average the Neighborhood Scores, weighting the scores by the estimated number of housing units in each identified neighborhood. Neighborhood NSP3 Score: 20 State Minimum Threshold NSP3 Score: 17 Total Housing Units in Neighborhood: 66 Area Benefit Eligibility Percent Persons Less than 120% AMI: 84.1 Percent Persons Less than 80% AMI: 66.3 Neighborhood Attributes (Estimates) Vacancy Estimate USPS data on addresses not receiving mail in the last 90 days or "NoStat" can be a useful measure of Whether or not a target area has a serious vacancy problem. For urban neighborhoods, HUD has found that neighborhoods with a very high number vacant addresses relative to the total addresses in an area to be a very good indicator of a current for potentially serious blight problem. The USPS "NoStat" indicator can mean different things. In rural areas, it is an indicator of vacancy. However, it can also be an address that has been issued but not ever used, it can indicate units under development, and it can be a very distressed property (most of the still flood damaged properties in New Orleans are NoStat). When using this variable, users need to understand the target area identified. In addition, the housing unit counts HUD gets from the US Census indicated above are usually close to the residential address counts from the USPS below. However, if the Census and USPS counts are substantially different for your identified target area, users are advised to use the information below with caution. For example if there are many NoStats in an area for units never built, the USPS residential address count may be larger than the Census number; if the area is a rural area largely served by PO boxes it may have fewer addresses than housing units. USPS Residential Addresses in Neighborhood: 66 Residential Addresses Vacant 90 or more days (LISPS, March 2010): 3 Residential Addresses NoStat (USPS, March 2010): 0 EXHIBIT F Foreclosure Estimates HUD has developed a model for predicting where foreclosures are likely. That model estimates serious delinquency rates using data on the leading causes of foreclosures - subprime loans (HMDA Census Tract data on high cost and highly leveraged loans), increasing unemployment (BLS data on unemployment rate change), and fall in home values (FHFA data on house price change). The predicted serious delinquency rate is then used to apportion the state total counts of foreclosure starts (from the Mortgage Bankers Association) and REOs (from RealtyTrac) to individual block groups. Total Housing Units to receive a mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 26 Percent of Housing Units with a high cost mortgage between 2004 and 2007: 31.1 Percent of Housing Units 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure: 19.3 Number of Foreclosure Starts in past year: 3 Number of Housing Units Real Estate Owned July 2009 to June 2010: 1 HUD is encouraging grantees to have small enough target areas for NSP 3 such that their dollars will have a visible impact on the neighborhood. Nationwide there have been over 1.9 million foreclosure completions in the past two years. NSP 1, 2, and 3 combined are estimated to only be able to address 100,000 to 120,000 foreclosures. To stabilize a neighborhood requires focused investment. Estimated number of properties needed to make an impact in identified target area (20% of REO in past year): 1 Supporting Data Metropolitan Area (or non -metropolitan area balance) percent fall in home value since peak value (Federal Housing Finance Agency Home Price Index through June 2010): -41.5 Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2005': 4 Place (if place over 20,000) or county unemployment rate June 2010': 11.9 'Bureau of Labor Statistics Local Area Unemployment Statistics Market Analysis: HUD is providing the data above as a tool for both neighborhood targeting and to help inform the strategy development. Some things to consider: 1. Persistent Unemployment. Is this an area with persistently high unemployment? Serious consideration should be given to a rental strategy rather than a homeownership strategy. 2. Home Value Change and Vacancy. Is this an area where foreclosures are largely due to a combination of falling home values, a recent spike in unemployment, and a relatively low vacancy rate? A down payment assistance program may be an effective strategy. 3. Persistently High Vacancy. Are there a high number of substandard vacant addresses in the target area of a community with persistently high unemployment? A demolition/land bank strategy with selected acquisition rehab for rental or lease -purchase might be considered. 4. Historically low vacancy that is now rising. A targeted strategy of acquisition for homeownership and rental to retain or regain neighborhood stability might be considered. 5. Historically high cost rental market. Does this market historically have very high rents with low vacancies? A strategy of acquiring properties and developing them as long-term affordable rental might be considered. Latitude and Longitude of corner points -80.213435 26,196696-80.213435 26.195108-80,212383 26.194463-80.211836 26.194424-80.210956 26.196042-80,210474 26.196090-80.210409 26.196764 Blocks Comprising Target Neighborhood 120110601071011,120110601071013,120110601071012,