HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-2007-193Temp. Reso. # 11328
November 20, 2007
Page 1 of 4
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-2007-JYJ
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE
APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE TASK
AUTHORIZATION NO. 08-01 E WITH MATHEWS
CONSULTING, INC., TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES TO PREPARE A WATER SYSTEM MASTER
PLAN (STUDY) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S
CONSULTING ENGINEERING AGREEMENT AS
AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION NO. R-2006-131, FOR AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $212,868.00; APPROVING
FUNDING FROM THE APPROPRIATE BUDGETED
UTILITIES OPERATIONAL AND CIAC ACCOUNTS;
AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE CITY OFFICIALS TO
ADMINISTER THE CONTRACT; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tamarac owns, operates and maintains the water supply,
treatment, and distribution systems; and
WHEREAS, it has been eleven years since a Comprehensive Water System Study
of capital improvement needs within the City of Tamarac water system has been
conducted; and
WHEREAS, this Water System Master Plan (Study) will upgrade the City of
Tamarac hydraulic model and ultimately result in recommendations for future Capital
Improvement Projects that will satisfy the requirements of our outstanding bonds; and
I
Temp. Reso. # 11328
November 20, 2007
Page 2 of 4
WHEREAS, the City requires the service of a consulting firm knowledgeable in this
area and capable of providing professional services to prepare a Water System Master
Plan (Study) for the City of Tamarac; and
WHEREAS, Mathews Consulting, Inc., possesses the required knowledge and
experience to provide professional services needed to prepare a Water System Master
Plan (Study) for the City of Tamarac; and
WHEREAS, Mathews Consulting, Inc., has been pre -qualified as an approved
consultant for engineering services by the City of Tamarac as authorized by Resolution No.
R-2006-131, passed and adopted by the City Commission on July 12, 2006; and
WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of the Director and Assistant Director of
Utilities that Task Authorization No. 08-01 E from Mathews Consulting, Inc., be approved,
executed and funded; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, deems it to be in
the best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Tamarac to accept and execute
Task Authorization No. 08-01 E (a copy of which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A") with
Mathews Consulting, Inc., to provide professional services to prepare a Water System
Master Plan (Study) for the City of Tamarac for an amount not to exceed $212,868.00 and
to provide funding from the appropriate Utilities Operational and CIAC accounts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, THAT:
1
Temp. Reso. # 11328
November 20, 2007
Page 3 of 4
SECTION 1: The foregoing "WHEREAS" clauses are hereby ratified and
confirmed as being true and correct and are hereby made a specific part of this resolution.
SECTION 2: The appropriate City Officials are hereby authorized to accept
and execute Task Authorization No. 08-01 E with Mathews Consulting, Inc., to provide
engineering services to prepare a Water System Master Plan (Study) for the City of
Tamarac, in accordance with the City's Consulting Engineering Agreement as authorized
by Resolution No. R-2006-131, for an amount not to exceed $212,868.00.
SECTION 3: The $212,868.00 is approved to be funded from the appropriate
budgeted Utilities FY 2008 Operational and CIAO accounts.
SECTION 4: The City Manager, or his designee, are hereby authorized to
make changes, issue Change Orders not to exceed $30,000.00 per Section 6-156 (b) of
the City Code, and close the contract award including, but not limited to making final
payment within the terms and conditions of the contract and within the contract price.
SECTION 5: All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 6: If any clause, section, other part or application of this Resolution
is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, in part or
application, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this
Resolution.
1
SECTION 7
passage and adoption.
f 111ifyj
Temp. Reso. # 11328
November 20, 2007
Page 4 of 4
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day ofkzez� ,
ATTEST:
MARION SWENSON, CMC
CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that
I have approved this
RESOLUTION as to form.
MUEL S. GOREN
CITY ATTORNEY
NINE,
•
1114YOT
RECORD OF COMMISSION VOTE:
MAYOR FLANSBAUM-TALABISCO4(e,4�
DIST 1: COMM. PORTNER
DIST 2: COMM. ATKINS-GRAD
DIST 3: V/M SULTANOF
DIST 4: COMM. DRESSLER
;1
1
CITY OF TAMARAC "EXHIBIT A"
Task Order Authorization No. 08-01E TR #11328
Engineering Services for Development of a
Comprehensive Water Master Plan
DATE: November 12, 2007
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Tamarac has requested professional services for the preparation of a Comprehensive
Water Master Plan. The purpose of the Master Plan is to keep the City current with overall water
planning strategies and identify future water supply, treatment and distribution needs for the
City's service area.
SCOPE OF WORK
The services provided under this authorization will be divided into defined tasks in order to
develop the information required to be included in the Comprehensive Water Master Plan. The
following is the description of the tasks to be completed by the Consultant:
Task I —Project Management
Consultant shall provide overall project management which includes monitoring progress of work
on a weekly basis for billing and compliance with established schedule, budget, and work quality
requirements, and coordination with team subconsultants to ensure timely project deliverables
and budget management.
Consultant shall also provide attendance at general project meetings which shall include the
following:
■ One project kick-off meeting to discuss overall project tasks and to discuss City
Water System goals.
• One meeting with the City's IT department to coordinate consumption data
download.
■ One meeting with City staff to discuss existing condition of raw water system,
treatment unit process, and distribution facilities.
■ One meeting with City staff to coordinate collection of calibration data for hydraulic
model.
■ One meeting with City staff to discuss draft report.
■ One meeting with City Council for adoption of Master Plan.
11/13/07
Task 2 — Identify City's Water Treatment & Distribution Goals, Strategies and Level of
Service (LOS)
Task 2.1 Evaluate Historical Data
Consultant shall evaluate and provide trending of the WTP historical flows, including raw,
finished and distribution flows for the last 2-years of operation. Consultant shall evaluate and
provide trending of the WTP historical raw and finished water quality (select parameters) for the
last 5-years of operation.
Consultant shall obtain and evaluate 2-years of water consumption data in MS Excel® format and
establish trends for per capita water consumption. The data shall be provided in spreadsheet
format and shall include customer acct. #, customer name, customer type (residential,
commercial, etc.) customer address, property control number, meter route and monthly water
consumption for the 26-month period. It is estimated that 19,000 accounts will be included in the
consumption data. Consultant shall obtain past population data for the City and project future
population growth based on previous trends, and projected buildout and/or redevelopment areas
within the City. Consultant shall coordinate with population projections contained in the City's
current Comprehensive Plan.
Task 2.2 Identify Water System Goals
Consultant shall identify overall general capacity goals of the system and overall general facility
goals, including standards for flood protection, hurricane protection, emergency power, and
communications. Consultant shall identify water quality goals of the treatment and distribution
system. Consultant shall identify the City's desired Level of Service (minimum water pressures,
fire flows, peaking factors, per capita demands, etc.).
Task 2.3 Summarize Future Regulatory Requirements
Consultant shall review and summarize future regulatory impacts to the City's water system,
including water quality, monitoring requirements, sludge management, and staffing levels
required for the City's existing and future WTP. Consultant shall identify those critical
regulatory issues that need to be incorporated into planning and design of future facilities.
Task 2.4 Review Water Conservation Program
Consultant shall review the City's current water conservation program and recommend
modifications, if required, to optimize the conservation program and to align the program with
future conservation goals established by the SFWMD Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan and
the City's Sl~ WMD Water Use Permit.
Task 2.5 Coordinate with Strategic Plans
Consultant shall review the City's current City and Utilities strategic plans and make reference to
relevant sections of those plans in the Water Master Plan. Consultant shall coordinate the
proposed water master plan with relevant sections, goals and objectives of the strategic plans.
11/13/07
Task 3 — Water Treatment Plant Evaluation
Task 3.1 Asset Evaluation and Assessment of Existing Structures and Equipment
Consultant shall perform field investigations of the WTP raw water wells and treatment processes
and shall develop a listing of all equipment and structures, including volumes, power, capacity,
age and assessment of condition. The purpose of the assessment is to inventory all existing
facilities and identify improvements needed to be incorporated into the Water Master Plan Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) over the next 20 years. To assist with the inventory process, City
shall provide copies of available record drawings, facility permits and operating reports in a
timely manner.
Task 3.2 Capacity Analysis of Existing Treatment System
The purpose of this Task is to evaluate the ability of the existing water treatment plant to meet the
future water demand and desired water quality goals for the next twenty years. The future water
demands and the City's desired water quality goals are to be determined in Task 2. For the
evaluation, Consultant shall perform a desk top analysis to assess the existing plant ability to meet
the projected maximum daily flow or projected peak hourly flow, as applicable.
Based on discussions with the City, a 2.0 mgd low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO) treatment
system is planned to be on-line sometime between 2012 and 2020 to supplement the flow from
the existing lime softening plant and to address future water supply needs of the City.
Subtask 3.2.A — Hydraulic Capacity Evaluation
Consultant shall perform a hydraulic profile evaluation through the plant -site to
determine if hydraulic limitations exist for the plant to meet future water demands for the
next twenty years. Each unit process including the raw water wells, major in -plant
piping, treatment units, storage tanks and on -site high service pumps shall be evaluated
before and after the LPRO system is constructed.
Each applicable unit process shall be evaluated assuming firm capacity which assumes
the largest component out of operation. Fire flow design flow shall also be considered
per FAC 62-555.320(6) which states that the capacity of the water storage and treatment
facilities must meet design maximum day demand including design fire flow. Storage
tanks shall be evaluated for operational equalization plus fire flow per FAC 62-
55.320(19).
Pipe flow capacity shall be evaluated assuming a maximum velocity of 8 ft/s.
Subtask 3.2.B — Treatment Capacity Evaluation
Consultant shall perform an evaluation of the lime softening treatment capacity at
projected flow rates for the major treatment units before and after the construction of the
LPRO system. Generally accepted operational or design loading rates shall be compared
against the loading rates at the projected flow rates to determine if lime softening
treatment will be acceptable. At the future water demand, the chemical usage shall also
be projected to determine if an increase in storage or feed rate will be needed. Chlorine
disinfectant CT calculations will also be evaluated at future flow rate to determine if the
existing disinfection procedures will be adequate at the future flow rate.
11/13/07
The ability of the existing plant to meet the desired water quality goals of the City shall
also be discussed. Potential new treatment processes to meet the desired water shall be
discussed and compared, if required.
Subtask 3.2.0 — Auxiliary Systems Evaluation
The auxiliary systems that support the existing lime softening treatment system and the
future LPRO system shall be evaluated for capacity. These auxiliary systems include:
electrical power, backup power, instrumentation and control, plant water service, and
laboratory services. Each auxiliary system shall be evaluated on its reliability and ease of
use. Sound engineering and operational practices shall be considered.
Future normal and backup power demand shall be determined based on existing
maximum power demand from the lime softening system and estimated power demand
for the LPRO system.
Task 3.3 — Evaluation of Future Treatment Systems
The purpose of this Task is to provide a conceptual plan and estimated cost for the planned 2.0
mgd LPRO system. The task will also look at water quality blending options with LPRO
membrane permeate. Any other future treatment system that may be needed to meet the City's
desired water quality as may be recommended in Task 3.2 above will also be addressed.
Subtask 3.3.A — Planned LPRO System
Consultant shall perform a desktop analysis to determine the conceptual design for the
planned 2.0 mgd LPRO system for planning purposes. The desktop analysis will
consider the water quality from Floridan wells in the area with similar anticipated
construction for treatment with the LPRO. The water quality data from the nearby
Floridan wells will be used to estimate required flows and pressure for the LPRO system
as well as the resulting water quality from the LPRO system using predictive model
programs from membrane manufacturers (DOW and Hydranautic).
Based on the desktop analysis, Consultant shall develop a conceptual design to provide
layout information for space planning and budgeting purposes. Major components will
be sized preliminarily to determine required mechanical and electric requirements. These
major components shall include but not limited to Floridan wells, cartridge filters,
membrane feed pumps, LPRO membrane trains, chemical systems, permeate
degassifiers, and odor control scrubbers. A site plan shall be developed showing the
general location for the LPRO on the existing LPRO site. Clearwell issues concerning
CT disinfection requirements and redundancy shall also be address with the plant layout.
Potential membrane concentrate disposal system available to the City will be discussed.
However, the options open to the City are limited. For the purposes of this scope, a deep
injection well system is assumed for the conceptual design and layout.
11/13/07 4
Subtask 3.3.B — LPRO Water Blending
Based on the finished water quality of the LPRO system, blending Floridan or Surficial
raw water with membrane permeate may be a cost effective treatment alternative to
produce the desired finished water quality at a lower cost. This evaluation will determine
the feasibility of blending raw water with membrane permeate by performing mass
balance calculations at various ratios of membrane permeate to raw water to determine if
the desired water quality can be achieved economically.
The resulting finished water quality from blending the LPRO membrane permeate with
the water produced from the existing lime softening treatment process will also be
assessed by performing mass balance calculations. This evaluation will identify potential
water quality issues associated with corrosion control.
Subtask 3.3.0 — Lime Softening Future Treatment System
A conceptual design (if recommended in Task 3.2 above) to augment or replace the
existing lime softening system shall be developed for space planning and budgeting
purposes. Major components shall be sized and site plan proposed as required. This task
includes evaluation of water recovery from filter backwash and lime sludge blowdown
from Accelators, including conceptual design and CIP recommendations. This task will
also review replacement of existing clearwell with new clearwell and new administration
building designed to meet current hurricane windload standards.
Task 3.4 — Recommendations
Based on the evaluations above, Consultant shall summarize recommendations for WTP
improvements. Included with the recommendations shall be estimated construction costs and
schedules for engineering, permitting, construction and commissioning of the raw water and
treatment improvements. The schedule will identify when the City should have the proposed
Floridan wellfield on-line with associated LPRO system.
Task 4 — Water Distribution System Evaluation
Task 4.1 Asset Evaluation and Assessment of Existing Structures and Equipment
Consultant shall perform field investigations of the water distribution storage and pumping
facilities and shall develop a listing of all equipment and structures, including volumes, power,
capacity, age and assessment of condition. The purpose of the assessment is to inventory all
existing facilities and identify improvements needed to be incorporated into the Water Master
Plan CIP over the next 20 years. To assist with the inventory process, City shall provide copies
of available record drawings, facility permits and operating reports in a timely manner.
Task 4.2 Capacity Analysis of Existing Water Distribution System
The purpose of this Task is to evaluate the ability of the existing water distribution system to
meet the future water demand and desired water quality goals for the next twenty years. The
future water demands and the City's desired water quality goals are to be determined in Task 2.
For the evaluation, Consultant shall perform a desk top analysis to assess the existing distribution
11/13/07
storage and pumping facilities to meet the projected maximum daily flow or projected peak
hourly flow, as applicable.
Each system shall be evaluated assuming firm capacity which assumes the largest component out
of operation. Fire flow design flow shall also be considered per FAC 62-555.320(6) which states
that the capacity of the water storage and treatment facilities must meet design maximum day
demand including design fire flow. Storage tanks shall be evaluated for operational equalization
plus fire flow per FAC 62-55.320(19).
Pipe flow capacity shall be evaluated assuming a maximum velocity of 8 ft/s.
Task 4.3 Evaluate Unaccounted for Water Loss in the Distribution System
Consultant shall obtain 2-years plus 2 months of water production and water billing data from the
City (assumes use of data obtained in Task 2.1). Water production data shall include water
produced at the water treatment plant as well as any flows obtained through interconnects.
Consultant shall obtain non -billed, accounted for water from the City for the 26-month study
period. Consultant shall also obtain meter reading schedule for the City and meter calibration
data for plant meters as well as for customer meters. Water produced and water billed will be
corrected for meter reading lag time and meter inaccuracies. The Consultant shall then calculate
unaccounted for water based on the following equation:
Water — Water — Accounted -for = Leakage or
Produced Billed Non -billed Water Unaccounted
For Water
The results of this task shall be presented in a customized worksheet model format (including
electronic copy) that can be used by the City for future water accounting purposes.
Task 4.4 Develop Hydraulic Model of the Distribution System
Subtask 4.4.A — Model Development
Consultant shall develop a hydraulic model using WaterCad® software for the potable
water main system to assess the capacity in order to accommodate future water demands.
The model shall be developed based on City GIS maps converted into AutoCad v. 2005
format (conversion by the City). City shall also provide information regarding any future
developments and/or modifications to the water system not yet reflected on the GIS
maps. The model shall include pipe sizes 4-inches and larger. It is assumed that a
minimum 2,000 pipe model is required based on preliminary transmission and
distribution maps provided by the City.
C-Factors shall be established based on estimated age of the pipelines and field.
verification data for system pressures, both provided by the City. Previous hydrant flow
testing reports will also be used, if available.
Consultant shall utilize the water consumption data received under Task 4.3 and assign
each customer in the water consumption data to a grid area designated on the City's water
11/13/07 6
distribution map. The entries will be grouped according to grid number, and an average
daily demand for each grid will be established. The number of nodes in each grid will be
determined, and an average day demand per grid area will be calculated. An average day
demand per node per grid will also be calculated and input into the model.
A leakage value per node will be input into the model based on the unaccounted for water
calculation performed under Task 4.3.
Subtask 4.4.B — Calibrate Flow Model
Consultant shall calibrate the model using calibration data provided by the City.
Calibration data shall consist of system pressure readings taken throughout the City and
plant finished water flow records. It is anticipated that 24-hour pressure recording
devices will be installed and data collected by the City staff for Consultant's use to
calibrate the model. A pre -determined time period will be established for collecting the
data (for example, for a 1-week period, every half hour). Minimum, maximum and
average readings shall be provided for each location and time interval. The model will be
calibrated using the above listed data to within ± 10% of the field readings.
Subtask 4.4.0 — Calibrate Chlorine Residual Water Quality Model
Consultant shall incorporate the latest chlorine residual data into the model and calibrate
the water quality model extended -period simulation. The City shall provide to
Consultant the latest map showing chlorine residual monitoring locations, as well as
chlorine dosage points. The City will provide chlorine residual readings at all of the
monitoring points and injection points.
Consultant will run the model with the average of all of the chlorine residual data for
each location. Chlorine bulk reaction coefficient and wall reaction coefficients will be
adjusted until the model is calibrated to within f 10% of the field readings.
Subtask 4.4.D — Model Future Flow Scenarios
The model shall be used to identify nature and extent of needed improvements to meet
future needs and to improve current conditions. Up to five (5) "what -if' scenarios shall
be run to confirm needed improvements. Up to four (4) fire flow scenarios shall be run
based on ISO and the City's Fire Department minimum fire flow capacity requirements.
The extended -period water quality model simulation shall be checked at future flows to
identify needed improvements to meet water quality goals.
Task 4.5 — Recommendations
Based on the evaluations above, Consultant shall summarize recommendations for the water
distribution system improvements. Included with the recommendations shall be estimated
construction costs and schedules for engineering, permitting, construction and commissioning of
the improvements.
11/13/07
Task S — Prepare Final Report
Consultant shall prepare a Draft Final Report summarizing the results of Tasks I through 4 listed
above. The report shall include an Executive Summary of the report sections. Five (5) copies of
the report shall be submitted to the City for review and comment. Upon receipt of City
comments, Consultant shall prepare the Final Report and submit ten (10) copies to the City.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Mathews Consulting will provide Additional Services as mutually agreed upon between Mathews
Consulting and the Client. Additional Services may include any service that is requested that is
not specifically outlined within the Scope of Services.
ASSUMPTIONS
Work described herein is based upon the assumptions listed below. If conditions differ from
those assumed in a manner that will affect schedule of Scope of Work, Consultant shall advise
City in writing of the magnitude of the required adjustments. Changes in completion schedule or
compensation to Consultant will be negotiated with City. All documents to be provided by the
City to the Consultant shall be delivered in a timely manner.
1. City to provide copies of existing WTP and water distribution system GIS maps, as -built
drawings, schematics, etc.
2. City to provide copies or information regarding permits for plant construction, operation,
and water consumptive use.
3. City to provide copy of last water master plan report.
4. To develop costs, City staff will provide information on desired level of architecture,
visibility and sound proofing for recommended facilities.
5. City to prioritize water quality goals.
6. City to provide required fire flow rates.
All data required for implementation of this scope of services (population data, water
flow data, water quality data, historical chemical residual data, pressure data, accounted
for non -billed water, and consumption data) shall be provided by or made available by
City Staff. It is assumed this data may not be in spreadsheet format and may need to be
manually input into spreadsheet format by Consultant.
8. Consumption data shall be provided as MS Excel® spreadsheet in format acceptable to
Consultant. An allowance will be provided for Consultant to re -organize the data should
the City's IT staff not be able to provide the data in the desired format.
9. No survey services are included.
10. No exploratory services are included which would confirm line sizes, pipe materials or
other characteristics of buried facilities.
11/13/07
11. All flow readings, pressure readings, and operational records shall be provided by the
City.
12. Flow demands for individual residential homes may be grouped into common
"neighborhood" demand nodes to optimize model components for pipes and nodes.
13. Any conversions of AutoCad maps to GIS Arcview format will be performed by City
staff.
14. City shall provide copy of all Conservation Program documents/elements.
15. Services do not include providing a copy of the modeling software & associated license
to the City.
11/13/07 9
CONTRACT PERFORMANCE
Proposed fees and schedule for completion of major work tasks are summarized below.
COMPLETION DATES:
The items described in the above Scope of Services shall be completed as follows:
Task:
Time from NTP*
Task 1
— Project Management
180 days
Task 2
— Identify City Goals
60 days
Task 3
— Water Treatment Plant Evaluation
150 days
Task 4
— Water Distribution System Evaluation
150 days
Task 5
— Final Report
180 days
*Note: Time frames for each task overlap. Overall schedule for completion of the Scope of Services is 180
(calendar) days.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FEES:
Proposed labor costs and associated expenses for basic engineering services and additional
engineering services are tabulated below.
ENGINEERING SERVICES LUMP SUM
Task 1 — Project Management $10,160.00
Task 2 — Identify City Goals $22,840.00
Task 3 — Water Treatment Plant Evaluation $54,063.00
Task 4 — Water Distribution System Evaluation $86,720.00
Task 5 — Final Report $28,085.00
Consumption Data Allowance $ 6,000.00
Reimbursables $ 5,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$212,868.00
Additional Services - The fee for Additional Services shall be billed using the Hourly
Rate Schedule contained in the General Contract, or as an agreed upon fixed fee.
11/13/07 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have made and executed this Agreement on the respective
dates under each signature. CITY OF TAMARAC, signing by and through its Mayor and City
Manager, and MATHEWS CONSULTING INC., signing by and through its President, duly
authorized to execute same.
ATTEST:
Marian Swenson, CMC
City Clerk
Date:
ATT
Signature of Cor orate Secretary
David L. Mathews
Type name of Corporate Secretary
(CORPORATE SEAL)
CITY QF TAMARAC
By: (&q 46
Beth Flansbaum-Talabisco, Mayor
Date: _ / �o 7
By: 1� .. u /17 c: ex-y.,-....
Jeffrey L. iller, City Manager
Date: /a'h3l 7
Approv s to form and legal sufficiency:
By:-.
t,K S Goren, City Attorney
Date: 1.01 a 7
MATHEWS CONSULTING, INC.
M
Rene L. Mthetvs, President/Owner
Date: - 11-14-01—)
11/13/07
CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF Florida
COUNTY OF Palm Beach
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an Officer duly authorized in the State
aforesaid and the County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, personally appeared
Rene L. Mathews , of Mathews Consulting, Inc., a Florida Corporation, to
me know to be the person(s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged before me that he executed the same.
/9
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of / , 2007.
Nancy ArrnftrOnp
Signature of NAary Public
--
,1�"' NN cWMn"W State of Floridaat Large
yip Expires FMxw y 211, 200d
Print, Type or Stamp
Nance of Notary Public
Personally known to me, or
Produced identification
Type of I.D. Produced
Did take an oath, or
Did not take an oath
11/13/07 12
City of Tamarac
ConWrehensive Water Master Plan
Engineering Fee P,regQsal
Task No.
Task Description
Labor Classification
and Hourly Rates
Principal
Engineer
$130
Senior Project
Engineer
$120
Engineer I
$94
Senior
Eng. Tech.
$85
Cad
Designer
$80
Clerical
$50
Total
1 Labor
EPA
Sub-
Consultant
Services
JLA
Sub-
Consultant
Services
GT
Sub -
Consultant
Services
ragement
o act Man„ _
_..,_.
.
1.1
Overall PM
24
0
$3.120
1.2
Project Kick-off Meetin
4
4
0
$1,000
$480
13__
IT Meeting
4
0
$520
1.4
System condition meeting
4
w
4
0
$1 000
$820
1.5
Hydraulic model meeting_
4
_
0
$520
1 e.... _
Draft Report meeting
5
LL
5
0
$1,200
Subtotal Task 1
45
13
_ _
0
0
0
0
_$1,250
$7,410
$0
$0
$2,500
2
Identify City Goals
2.1
Evaluate Historical Data
60
20
80
$14,200
2.2
Identify Water System Goals
8 `..
4
mm
$1,520
2.3
Summarize Future Re Re uiremenls
^_
6
__...W_.
$780
_
$2,800
2.4
Review Water Conservation Plan
8
8
$2,000
2.5
Coordinate with Strata is Plans
8
4
$1,260
Subtotal Task 2
88
36
0
0
0
80
$19,760
_ $0
$0
$2,800
_ 3
Water Treatment Plant Evaluation
ion
l
3.1
Asset Evaluation and Assessment
30
30
1 6
$7,600
1
1 $2,400
3.2
Capacity Analysis of Existing Treatment S s.
3.2.a
H draulic Capacity Evaluation
6
$780
$6,040
3.2.6
-
Treatment Ca acit Evaluation
Capacity �_. .,...
6
$780
$4,-.......
gz0
3.2.c
Auxiliary Systems Evaluation
6
8
$1 740
$3,750
$1,200
3.3
„ Evaluation of Future Treatment System
" "
3.3.a
Planned l PR0 System
6 _ _
$780
$960
$4,800
3.3.b
LPRO Water Blendin
6
$780
$960
$1,840
3.3.c
Lime Softening Future Treatment System
181
$2,340
$5,060
3.4
Recommendations
--
8
4
$1,520
$2,300
Subtotal Task 3
86
42
0
0
0
6
$16,520
1 $3,750
$1,920
$28,460
4
4A
Water Distribution S stem Evaluation
Asset Evaluation
uation and Assessment
20
80
8
$12,500
$1,000
4.2 _
Capacity Analysis of Exist. Water Dist, System_,_,.
8
16
$2.960
4.3
Evaluate Unaccounted for Water Loss
64
40
24
$14,320
4.4
Develop Hydraulic Model of the 5 stem
4.4.a
Model Development
120
40
4
40
$22,740
4.4.b
Calibrate Model Flow
40
40
12
$10,600.
Calibrate Chlorine Residual Water Quality Model
40
20
_
12
$8,200
4.4.d
Model Future Flow Scenarios
40
$5,200
4.5
Recommendations
40
20
l
8
Subtotal Task 4
372
258
0
4
0
102
$84,520
$2,000
$0
$0
5
Prepare Final Report _
5.1
Draft Report
45
20
30
8
$11.200
$500
$8,570
5.2
Final Repon
25._- .,..
10
__... 10
4
$5,500
_
Subtotal Task 5
70
30
0
40
_....._
0
12
$16,700
$500
-.....,, ...-$1,280
$o
$9,850
Labor Subtotal Hours
661
377
0
4.�
4
0
200
Labor Subtotal Costs
$85,930
$45,240
$0
$3 740
$0
$10,000
$144 910
$6,250
$1,920
_
$43,610
Labor Total Costs
$144,910
Subconsultant Costs Total
$51,780
Subconsultant Multi lier
1.1
_.-
Subconsultant Total
$56,958
_-_........_
Consumption Data Allowance
for manipulating un-formatted data
$6,000
Reimbursable Expenses
$5,000
Pro act Total
$212,868
11/13/07 13