HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-96-290November 27, 1996 - Temp. Reso. #7626 1
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-96- 2-qo
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA,
GRANTING A TIME EXTENSION FOR FINAL
SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR WOODMONT
GARDENS, INC. (ACLF) REQUESTED BY
ALAN GABRIEL, ESQ. FOR A ONE (1) YEAR
EXTENSION FOR PHASE I; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Chapter 10 of the Tamarac Code of Ordinances provides that the City
Commission may grant one year time extensions on site plan approvals ; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Tamarac, Florida, approved a site
plan for Woodmont Gardens, Inc. on December 23, 1987; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has granted one year extensions since the original
approval of the site plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on December 4, 1996 recommended
approval of this time extension; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development has recommended approval
of this application; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission approved revision to the bond financing of the
Woodmont Gardens ACLF on June 22, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the attorney for the applicant Woodmont Gardens, Inc., Mr. Alan
Gabriel, Esq., has offered on behalf of the applicant One Thousand Five Hundred
($1,500.00) Dollars to defray City expenses incurred in reviewing the request for this one
11
November 27, 1996 - Temp. Reso. #7626 2
(1) year extension for Phase I site plan to be paid no later than thirty (30) days after
approval of the extension; and
WHEREAS, the attorney for the applicant Woodmont Gardens, Inc., Mr. Alan
Gabriel, Esq., has offered on behalf of the applicant One Thousand Five Hundred
($1,500.00) Dollars to defray City expenses should a subsequent application for a one (1)
year extension for Phase I site plan be sought from the City Commission with the One
Thousand Five Hundred ($1,500.00) Dollars to be paid to the City no later than thirty days
(30) after approval of any subsequent extension; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it to be in the best interest of the citizens
and residents of the City of Tamarac to grant a one (1) year extension for Phase I for the
Woodmont Gardens, Inc. (ACLF) located south of Southgate Boulevard and east of Pine
Island Road, requested by Alan Gabriel, Esq. ; Case No. 44-SP-96.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: The foregoing "WHEREAS" clauses are hereby ratified and
confirmed as being true and correct and is hereby made a specific part of this Resolution.
SECTION 2: That the application for a one (1) year extension for Phase I site
plan for Woodmont Gardens, Inc. (ACLF) is approved subject to the following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and
specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section
II of the Development Review Status Sheet (attached hereto as Exhibit "A") and approved
engineering drawings.
1
1
November 27, 1996 - Temp. Reso. #7626 3
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one (1) year from
December 28, 1996 for Phase I. If the development does not commence construction
within one (1) year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in
accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does not
discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Commission
consents to modify any of the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised development
order are set forth as follows:
That if, in the future, there were more stringent requirements for approval of
a site plan, that Woodmont Gardens, Inc. (ACLF) would modify their site plan
to accommodate those new regulations.
SECTION I All resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 4: If any clause, section, other part or application of this Resolution
is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, in part or
application, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this
Resolution.
1
SECTION 5:
passage and adoption.
November 27, 1996 - Temp. Reso. #7626 4
This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this
ATTEST:
CAROL A. EVANS
CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I
jhp roveyofor.
N E LL S.
CITY ATTORNEY
community development\c:\userdata\wpdata\res\7626reso\ps
/l day of PeG40 14*1�— , 1996.
LA RY MISHKIN
VICE-MAYGR
RECORD OF COMMISSION VOTE
MAYC
DIST
DIST
DIST
DIST
CITY OF TAMARAC
7525 NORTHWEST 88 AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (306) 724-1292
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
Date: December 2, 1996
Orig. Dev. Order: 224
Revised Dev. Order:
Project:
Woodmont Gardens, Inc. (ACLF)
Master File:
15-87
Location:
South of Southgate Boulevard and east of Pine Island Road.
Developer:
Woodmont Gardens, Inc.
Owner:
Woodmont Gardens, Inc.
Zoning:
RM-5
Future Land
Use Designation: Residential
Acres: 7.02
Recommended Date for Commission Action: December 11, 1996
1. DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: SITE PLAN
Comments: Subject to Findings.
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL
Date of Action: December 4, 1996
Planning Commission findings of compliance with certified Plan:
3. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS:
Dated Received: December 1987
4. LANDSCAPE PLAN: December 1987
5. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT:
N/A
•
r;
EXHIBIT "A"
/!' � 2 � 0
6. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (where applicable)
•
•
A. REVISED Water and Sewer Developer Agreement:
City Engineer
City Attorney
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
C. Drainage Retention: N/A Fee Amount:
5% Required/Acres
Deficiency/Acres X $45,500/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement: N/A Fee Amount:
Project Acreage X $130.00/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount:
Developers
Number of ERC's X
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERAS Fee Amount: N/A
Local Parks/Recreation
Engineering Fees
--1
Date: Approved by City Engineer
City Attorney
On Site Beautification
Local Traffic Impact Fees:
7. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
Fee Amount:
Fee Amount:
Bond Amount: N/A
Fee Amount: N/A
Fee Amount:
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
B. Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE
2
X NOT AVAILABLE
0
0
D. Drainage Adequately
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of
Drainage
ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE X NOT ADEQUATE
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY X DOES NOT COMPLY
G. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY X DOES NOT COMPLY
H. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) Due prior to Building Permit.
I. School Sites: To be determined by Broward County
8. PROCESSING FEES (PAID)
Site Plan Previously paid when the site plan was approved.
Schematic Eng.
c:\userdsta\wpdataVorms\7626dr
0
3
No Text