HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-94-015Temp. Reso. # 6630
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-94-
A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT
ORDER NO. 253-3 FOR GRANVILLE PROJECT FOR
A REVISED SITE PLAN PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 10-2 THROUGH 10-29
OF THE TAMARAC CODE; PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council
of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in
accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of
the meeting regarding the review of the application for a
revised development order by the applicant for development
approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated
the application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations,
and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated January
20, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised develop
ment order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the appli
cation is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive
Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the subject
of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a
revised site plan for Granville, prepared by Carnahan and
Associates, Inc., revised on September 3, 1993, reflecting an
increase in the size of Buildings A, B, D, E and F, is HEREBY
APPROVED subject to the following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with
the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the
City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development
Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31.
32
33
34
35
Temp. Reso. # 6630
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than
one year from the date of this approval. If the development
does not commence construction within one year, this approval is
null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance
with applicable regulations.
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict
compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to
modify any of the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the revised development order are set forth as follows:
SECTION 2: All resolutions or parts of resolutions in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such
conflict.
SECTION 3: Should any section or provision of this
revised development order be declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if
the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the
approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 4: This revised development order as condi-
tioned shall become effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this A& day of ,
1994.
ATTEST:
CAROL A. EVANS, CMC
CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY thAion
ve
approyo this Resols
to fdrm((
MITCHIL S
CIT AT%
MAYOR
DIST 1:
DIST. 2:
DIST. 3:
DIST. 4:
RECORD OF COUNCIL.
111414
e9�iS
7525 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
Date: January 20,1994
_253_Orig. Dev. Order
�253-3_ Revised Dev. Order
Project: Granville
Master File: 4-89
Location: W. of Nob Hill Rd., S. of NW 80 St., E. of NW 108 Terr.
Developer: Lennar Homes, Inc
Owner: Same
Zoning. R-3U Acres:
Recommended Date for Council Action: 1/26/94
Future Land Use Designation: Residential
1. DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: REVISED SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN AND PLAT REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF APPROVAL DATE: 12/20/93
Comments: subject to findings of fact.
2. PLANNING COMMISSIONRECOMMENDATION- APPROVAL
Final Site Plan 1/19/94
Planning Commission findings of compliance with certified Plan: Yes
3. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWING:
APPROVED AS REDLINED 12/20/93
4. LANDSCAPE PLAN
Approved 12/20/93
S. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMNff= REPORT: N/A
r-1
LJ
. 6. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTSIFEES (where applicable)
A. REVISED Water and Sewer Developer Agreement
escrow
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
C. Drainage Retention: Fee AmountN/A
5% Required/Acres
Deficiency/Acres X $45,500/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount: N/A
Project Acreage 53.6 x $130.00/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount: N/A
Developers
number of ERCs x
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs
Fee Amount: N/A
G. Local Parks/Recreation
•
Fee Amount: N/A
H. Engineering Fees
Fee Amount: N/A
I. Bonds
Bond Amount: N/A
Date: Approved by City Engineer
City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification
Fee Amount: N/A
K. Future Traffic Needs
Fee Amount: N/A
7. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIEREMENTS
Received: in
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
B. Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
is AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE X NOT AVAILABLE
10
n
D. Drainage Adequately
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage
ADEQUATE X WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQUATE
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY
H. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X - WILL COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) PAID
J. School Sites N/A
8. PROCESSING FEES (PAID)
Revised Site Plan $ 600.00
Plat Review $
Schematic Eng. $