HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-94-0431
Temp. Reso. #6664
Rev. 3/23/94
2
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
3
RESOLUTION NO. R-94-
4
A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT
5
ORDER NO. 229-3 FOR THE POINT PLAZA
PROJECT FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN PURSUANT
6
TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 10-2
THROUGH 10-29 OF THE TAMARAC CODE;
7
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
8
9
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City
10
Council of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been
11
advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date,
12
time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the
13
application for a revised development order by the applicant
14
for development approval; and
15
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated
16
the application, staff and Planning Commission
17
recommendations, and the attached Development Review Status
18
Sheet dated January 20, 1994; and
19
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised
20
development order and accompanying documents at a public
21
meeting; and
22
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
23
application is in compliance with all elements of the
24
Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance
P p prior to the
25
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development
26
that is the subject of the application.
27
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
28
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
29
SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a
30
revised site plan for Point Plaza, prepared by Pebb
31
Enterprises, revised on December 13, 1993, reflecting 6,000
32
square feet of new commercial construction (outparcel) is
33
HEREBY APPROVED.
34
35
r
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
A
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Temp. Reso. #6664
Rev. 3/23/94
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with
the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to
the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the
Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering
drawings.
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than
one year from the date of this approval. If the development
does not commence construction within one year, this approval
is null and void unless an extension has been granted in
accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict
compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to
modify any of the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the development order are set forth as follows:
�/on/C-
SECTION 2: All resolutions or parts of resolutions in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such
conflict.
SECTION 3: Should any section or provision of this
development order be declared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine
if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether
the approval shall be null and void.
Page 2 of 3
Temp. Reso. #6664
Rev. 3/23/94
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
241
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
SECTION 4: This development order as conditioned shall
become effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this aZ-3 day of 1994.
NORMAN ABRAMOWITZ
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CAROL A. EVANS, CMC -
CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I ve
approved this Resolut' n as
to 0
(EC M CF COUNCIL VOTE
bITCAift S . K ''MAYOR
CITY ATTORNEY t-1ICT 1;111A
4DISTRICT 2• N
&ISTRICT 3. - t�RE
IUSTRICT 4: e[WM K.
Page 3 of 3
140
7525 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
Date: January 20,1994
_229 —Orig. Dev. Order
229-3 Revised Dev. Order
Project: Point Plaza
Master File: 1-87
Location: NE corner of Nob Hill Rd. and Westwood Dr.
Developer: PEBB Enterprises
Owner: Same
Zoning: B-1 Acres: 3.5
Recommended Date for Council Action: 3/23/94
Future Land Use Designation: Commercial
• 1. DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: REVISED SITE PLAN
Comments: subject to findings and wall waiver approval.
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL
Final Site Plan 3/2/94
Planning Commission findings of compliance with certified Plan: Yes
3. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWING:
APPROVED 2/18/94
4. LANDSCAPE PLAN Revised
Approved 12/18/94
5. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT: N/A
11
6. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (where applicable)
A. REVISED Water and Sewer Developer Agreement
City Engineer
City Attorney
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
C. Drainage Retention: Fee Amount.N/A
5% Required/Acres
Deficiency/Acres X $45,500/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount: N/A
Project Acreage 53.6 x $130.00/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount: N/A
Developers
number of ERCs x
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount: N/A
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount: N/A
H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount:
I. Bonds Bond Amount: N/A
Date: Approved by City Engineer
Received:
City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification Fee Amount: TBD at time of
permitting
K. Future Traffic Needs Fee Amount: Paid
7. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
B. Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
C�
r.' 9Y �3
r-1
6-J
11
D. Drainage Adequately
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage
ADEQUATE X WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQUATE
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY
H. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N/A
J. School Sites N/A
8. PROCESSING FEES (PAID)
Revised Site Plan $ 600.00
Plat Review $
Schematic Eng. $