HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-94-064y
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28.
291
30
31
32
33
34
35
Temp. Reso. #6681
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-94-_'.!
A RESOLUTION ISSUING DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 288
FOR GOULD SOUTH FOR A PLAT PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 10-2 THROUGH 10-29 OF
THE TAMARAC CODE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROVIDING AN
EF�TTYF DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City
-ouncil of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been
advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date, time
and place of the meeting regarding the review of the
application for a development order by the applicant for
development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and
investigated the application, staff and Planning Commission
recommendations, and the attached Development Review Status
Sheet dated March 30, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised
development order and accompanying documents at a public
meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
application is in compliance with all elements of the
Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development
that is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION J- That the development described on the
attached Development Review Status Sheet dated March 30, 1994,
is granted a development order subject to the following
conditions:
O-C
Temp. Reso. #6681
A. The development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict
compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to
modify any of the original requirements.
B. Additional conditions established in order to
issue the development order are set forth as follows:
SECTION 2: All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions
in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such
conflict.
SECTION 3: Should any section or provision of this
development order be delcared by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine
if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the
approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 4: This development order as conditioned
shall become effective immediately upoxi .adoption.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this aZ 7 day ofa14�
/ ,1994.
ATTEST:
2&L%11� e437-�>�
CAROL A. EVANS, CMC
CITY CLERK
I H BY CERTIFY that I ve
aril
o ed I
this Resoluti n as
t m . /1
S.
ATT
N ABRAMOWITZ
MAYOR
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR
ABRAMOWITZ
DIST. 1:
V / M KATZ
DIST. 2:
C / M MISHKIN 74
DIST. 3:
/ Itil ��C:HREIBL
DIST. 4:
_C
(, / W MACHEK
:wz
7525 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
Date: MARCH 30, 1994
_288—Orig. Dev. Order
Revised Dev. Order
Project: GOULD SOUTH PLAT
Master File: 6-93
Location: SOUTH OF MCNAB RD., EAST OF THE SAWGRASS EXPRESSWAY
Developer: LEIGH KERR & ASSOCIATES
Owner: GOULD
Zoning: LI-1 Acres: 5 #5 _5`7. / 75-
-Recommended Date for Council Action: 4/13/94
Future Land Use Designation: INDUSTRIAL
• 1. DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: FINAL PLAT
STAFF APPROVAL DATES: 3/4/94
City Planner 3/4/94
City Engineer 3/4/94
Chief Bldg. Official 3/4/94
Fire Chief 3/4/94
Comments: subject to findings of fact AND NO DEVELOPMENT ON PARCEL "B".
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL
Final PLAT 3/16/94
Planning Commission findings of compliance with certified Plan: Yes
3. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWING: WA
4. LANDSCAPE PLAN N/A
5. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT:
see attached
i
6. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (where applicable)
A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement N/A
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
C. Drainage Retention: Fee Amount:
5% Required/Acres
Deficiency/Acres X $45,500/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount:
Project Acreage x $130.00/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount:
number of ERCs x
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount:
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount: N/A
. per stipulation
H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount:
I. Bonds Bond Amount: N/A
Date: Approved by City Engineer
City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification Fee Amount: AT SITE PLAN
per stipulation
K. Future Traffic Needs Fee Fee Amount: AT SITE PLAN
per stipulation
7. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE X NOT AVAILABLE
B. Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE X NOT AVAILABLE
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE X NOT AVAILABLE
0
0
D. Drainage Adequately
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage
ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE X NOT ADEQUATE
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY X DOES NOT COMPLY
H. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY X DOES NOT COMPLY
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N/A
J. School Sites
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: N/A
S. PROCESSING FEES (PAID)
Final Site Plan $
Plat Review $ 2,347.00
Schematic Eng. $
4� V-�,f �