The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-94-081TEMP. RESO. 6706 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. R-94--V- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA, ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO.055-6 FOR CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT PROJECT FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 10-2 THROUGH 10-29 OF THE TAMARAC CODE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECITVE DATE, WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the application for a revised development order by the applicant for development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated MAY 11, 1994; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the subject of the application; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida deems it to be in the best interests of the citizens and residents of the City of Tamarac to DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO 055-6 AND REVISED SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A CHECKER DRIVE --IN RESTAURANT; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: The foregoing "WHEREAS" clauses are hereby ratified and confirmed as being correct and are hereby made a specific part of this resolution. That the application for approval of a revised site plan for Checkers Drive -In Restaurant at Three Lakes Plaza, prepared by Wescon Consulting, Inc., revised on April 22, 1994, reflecting a 785 square foot restaurant with 845 square feet of outdoor seating is HEREBY APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 01 TEMP. RESO. 6711 Book 113 at Page 43 of the public records of Broward County, Florida, requested by Checker Drive -In Restaurants, Inc. , Petition # 4-Z-94, is HEREBY APPROVED. HECTION 3: Conditions of approval: 1. The applicant shall be required to pay all appropriate fees associated with the special exception transfer. 2. The special exception is transferable administratively pursuant to compliance with City Codes and Submitting documentation; and payment of fees. ZLCTION,4: All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SF,ION„5: If any clause, section, other part or application of this Resolution is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, in part or application, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Resolution. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption., PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this � day of ,1994. ATTEST: CAROL A. EVANS, CMC CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved this Resolution as to form. I / I r NORMAN AB • MAYOR RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE MAYOR ABRAMOWITZ /.J, a DIST. 1: V / M KATZ DIST. 2: C / M MISHKIN DIST. 3: C / M SCHf;ME R DIST. 4: C / W MACHEK '), - _ 2 TEMP. RESO. 6706 A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section IT of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised development order are set forth as follows: Subject to approval of a special exception for a restaurant. All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. • If any clause, section, other part or application of this Resolution or Revised Development Order is held by any court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, in part or application, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this resolution or revised development order. SF.QTI5=. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 4-1 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1994. NORMAN ZABRAM WITZO ATTEST: R 6�C�AR�OLA�EV�ANS, CMC -- " CITY CLERK T HEREBY CERTIFY that have RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE a proved this Reso tion as MAYOR ABRAMOWITZ o M. DIST. 1: V / M KATZ DIST. 2: C / M MISHKIN _ DIST. 3: C / 5 :iC�-iREISER MTT HELL S . AFT DIST. 4: C / Vt.' MACI-iEK ATTORNEY VJ 7525 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321 TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900 Is DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET Date: May 11,1994 055_Orig. Dev. Order _055-6—Revised Dev. Order Project: Checkers Restaurant Master File: 16-80 Location: SW corner of Commercial Blvd. and NW 31 Ave. Developer: Checkers Drive -IN Restaurants, Inc. Owner: Three Lakes Plaza, LTD. Zoning: B-2 Acres: 10.37 Recommended Date for Council Action: 5/25/94 Future Land Use Designation: Residential 1. DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: REVISED SITE PLAN Comments: subject to findings. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL • Final Site Plan 5/4/94 Planning Commission findings of compliance with certified Plan: Yes 3. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWING: APPROVED 4/22/94 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN Approved 4/22/94 5. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT: N/A 6. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (where applicable) A. REVISED Water and Sewer Developer Agreement Received: City Engineer City Attorney 11 I• • C� J B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) C. Drainage Retention: Fee Amount:N/A 5% Required/Acres Deficiency/Acres X $45,500/Acre D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount: N/A Project Acreage 53.6 x $130.00/Acre E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount: TBD Developers number of ERCs x F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount: N/A G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount: N/A H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount: TBD I. Bonds Bond Amount: N/A Date: Approved. by City Engineer City Attorney J. On Site Beautification Fee Amount: N/A K. Future Traffic Needs Fee Amount: 681.38 7. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS A. Potable Water Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE B. Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE C. Solid Waste Disposal Service Determination of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE X NOT AVAILABLE D. Drainage Adequately Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage ADEQUATE X WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQUATE E. Regional Transportation Network Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY F. Local Streets and Loads Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY H. Police Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N/A J. School Sites N/A 8. PROCESSING FEES (PAID) Revised Site Plan $ 600.00 Special Exception $ 500.00 Plat Review $ Schematic Eng. $ 0