Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-93-031Temp. Reso. #6451 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. R­93-.�51 A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 055-4 FOR THE THREE LAKES PLAZA PROJECT FOR. A REVISED SITE PLAN PURSUANT TO THE :PROVISIONS OF :'ECTIONS 10--2 THROUGH 10-29 OF THE TAMARAC CODE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the instrtu:t_i.ons of the City louncil of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the appliciition for a revised development order by the applicant for development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and Planning Ccarwiss.ion recommendations, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated March 11, 1993; and WHEREAS, 'the City Council reviewed the revised develop- ment order and accompanying documents at-. a. public meeting; and WHEREAS, 'the City Council has determined that the appli- cation is in compliance with all elem1211t5 of the Comprehensive 'lan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the subject of the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That the application. for approval of a revised site plan for Three Lakes Plaza., prepared by Motchkavitz Engineering Company, revised on June 113, 1991, reflecting construction of a 3,800 square foot addition to an existing food store, :Located at the southwest: corner of Cornmeicial Boulevard and NW 31 Avenue, is HEREBY APPROVED subject to the following conditions: A. Construction is to boa :in complete compliance with 1,he plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. Temp. Reso., #6451 B. Commencement of cronst-i union shall be no longer than one year from the date of: this approval. -If thEt development loes not commence construction within one! year, this approval is ull and void unless an exterision has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. C. The :revised development older is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any a.ss:i.cinee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. D. Additional conditions eslri ablieshed in order to .issue the revised development order are :yet :forth as follows: SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised development Qrder be dec_La.red ]�,y a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall detElrinine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3: This rei7i.sed development order as condi- tioned shall become effective immediatel..y upon its passage. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED thiso L+ day of n� , 1993. L • , MAYOR TTES CAROL A. EVANS CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved this Resol ion as t 9/�Z�rm .A % , AEOOFO OF CCUNM V M L44ITCHELL S 1 Kr3'T DISTRICT 1; CITY ATTORN DISTRICT 21. DISTRICT 3: DISTRICT 4: 10 7525 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321 TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET Date: March 11, 1993 055_Orig. Dev. Order 0 5 5 - 4 Revised Dev. Order Project: Three Lakes Plaza Master File: 16-80 Location: SW corner of Commercial Blvd. and NW 31 Ave. Developer: Trammell Crow Company Owner: Trammell Crow Company Zoning: B-2 Acre: 10.378 Recommended Date for Council Action: 3/24/93 Future Land Use Designation: Commercial 1. DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: REVISED SITE PLAN STAFF APPROVAL DATES: 2/9/93 FINAL SITE PLAN FINAL PLAT REVISED SITE PLAN X City Planner 2/9/93 City Engineer 2/9/93 Chief Bldg. Official 2/9/93 Fire Chief 2/9/93 Comments: subject to findings of fact. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL Final Site Plan 3/3/93 Planning Commission findings of compliance with certified Plan: Yes 3. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWING: APPROVED AS REDLINED 2/9/93 0 0 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN Approved 2/9/93 5. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT: N/A Comments: 6. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (where applicable) A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement City Engineer Approval/Date City Attorney Approval/Date B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) C. Drainage Retention: Fee Amount: 5% Required/Acres Deficiency/Acres X $45,500/Acre D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount: Project Acreage x $130.00/Acre E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount: number of ERCs x F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount: G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount: N/A H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount: TBD I. Bonds Bond Amount: N/A Date:Approved by City Engineer City Attorney J. On Site Beautification Fee Amount: $520.52 K. Future Traffic Needs Fee Fee Amount: $2,367.40 7. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS A. Potable Water Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service: AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE DATE COMMENTS C -93-3[ B. Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE C. Solid Waste Disposal Service Determination of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE DATE COMMENTS D. Drainage Adequately Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage ADEQUATEX WILL BE ADEQUATE NOTADEQUATE DATE COMMENTS E. Regional Transportation Network Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOESNOTCOMPLY DATE COMMENTS F. Local Streets and Roads Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY DATE COMMENTS H. Police Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY DATE COMMENT I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N/A J. School Sites Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: N/A 8. PROCESSING FEES (PAID) Revised Site Plan $ 600.00 Plat Review $ Schematic Eng $ 750.00