HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-92-031Temp. Reso. # 6238
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-92- 5
A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT
ORDER NO. 234-1 FOR VISUAL GRAPHICS
CORPORATION (V.G.C-) PARK PHASE I PROJECT
FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 10--2 'THROUGH 10-29
OF THE TAMARAC CODE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council
of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in
accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the
meeting regarding the review of the application for a revised
development order by the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the
application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations, and
the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated March 2, 1992;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development
order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the appli-
cation is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive
Flan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the subject
of the application.
]VOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a revised
,site plan for V.G.C. Park Phase I, prepared by Post, Buckley,
Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., revised on January 30, 1992, reflecting
-the creation of two (2) entrances along Commercial Boulevard, the
widening of the median opening, revised parking circulation and
:Landscaping is HEREBY APPROVED subject to the following
conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with
the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the
City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development
Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings.
Temp. Reso. # 6238
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than
one year from the date of this approval. If the development does
not commence construction within one year, this approval is null
and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with
applicable regulations.
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance
with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of
'the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the revised development order are set forth as follows:
SECTION 2 Should any section or provision of this
:revised development order be declared by a court of competent
,jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if
the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the
approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned
;shall become effective immediately upon its passage.
]PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this i1':�hday of %�, 1992.
ATTEST:
CAROL A. EVANS
CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY t t I have
proved this Res 1 t. as
�o f rm. /n}
ITCHELL B. KY
CITY ATTORNE
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR ABRLN WITZ
DISTRICT 1: C�/9 !x <A�T7-�
DISTRICT 2:l�i, r111�.Jy�hl
DISTRICT 3: C-NJ CRASSER
DISTRICT 4: V/hdQENQE13
0
7525 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
Date:
_234_Orig. Dev. Order
_234-1 Revised Dev. Order
Project: VGC Park / Furguson Building Master File 68-77
Location. NW corner of Commercial Blvd, and NW 94 Ave.
Developer:
Owner:
Zoning: B-3, LI-1 Acre: Recommended Date for Council Action:
Future Land Use Designation: Proposed Use:
1. DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
FINAL SITE PLAN FINAL PLAT REVISED SITE PLAN X
STAFF APPROVAL DATES:
• FINAL SITE PLAN FINAL PLAT REVISED SITE PLAN X
City Planner 1 /1 4/92
City Engineer 1/ 1 4/ 9 2
Chief Bldg. Official 1/ 1 4/ 9 2
Fire Chief 1/ 1 4/ 9 2
Comments
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVAL X OR APPROVAL W/CONDITIONS/DATE DENIAUDATE
Final Site Plan dated
Final Plat dated
Revised Site Plan dated 2/19/92
Planning Commission findings of compliance with certified Plan: yes
C�
3. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWING:
APPROVAUDATE AS NOTED X APPROVAL AS DEADLINE/DATE DENIAUDATE
Comments
4. LANDSCAPE PLAN
Staff Action X Approval Date Approval w/conditions denial
5. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT:
Comments: N/A
6. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (where applicable)
A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, ect.)
• C. Drainage Retention:
Fee Amount: N/A
5% Required/Acres
Deficiency/Acres X $45,500/Acre
Drainage Improvement Fee Amount:
N/A
Project Acreage x $130.00/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges
Fee Amount: N/A
number of ERCs x
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs
Fee Amount: N/A
G. Local Parks/Recreation
Fee Amount: N/A
Acres Required Provided
$/Acre x Deficiency/Acres
H. Engineering Fees
Fee Amount: N/A
I. Bonds Bond Amount: N/A
Date:Approved by City Engineer
City Attorney