HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-90-141Temp. Reso. #5798
r
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-90-
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATE CITY
OFFICIALS TO EXECUTE A STIPULATED AGREEMENT WITH
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
SETTING FORTH THE AMENDMENTS TO THE TAMARAC
COMPREHENSIVE PLANT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION-1: That the appropriate City officials are hereby
authorized to execute a Stipulated Agreement with the Florida
Department of Community Affairs setting forth the amendments to the
Tamarac Comprehensive Plan in order to bring the Plan into compliance
with the requirements of the Florida Department of Community Affairs,
a copy of said agreement being attached hereto as "Exhibit 10.
SECTION 2: This Resolution shall become effective upon
adoption. lilt
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this -.2,3 day of 1990.
ATTEST:
-TAROL A. EVANS
CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
approved this ION as
to
ALAN F. R
INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY
1
NORMAN ABR
MAYOR
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR ABRAMOWIIZ
DISTRICT 1: C/M ROHR
DISTRICT2: C(M SCHUMANN �_
DISTRICT S: V/M HOFFMAN � 0
D1STRICT4: C/M SENDER
i
STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, )
)
Petitioner, )
VS. )
CITY OF TAMARAC, )
Respondent. )
%l-So-/yi
DOAH CASE NO. 90-1892GM
Petitioner Florida Department of Community Affairs
(Department) and Respondent City of Tamarac hereby stipulate and
agree as follows:
I. Defiaiti_ons. As used in this agreement, the following
words and phrases shall have the following meanings:
a. Act: The Local Government Comprehensive Planning
and Land Development Regulation Act, as codified in Part II,
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (1987).
b. Agreement: This stipulated settlement agreement.
ce Com2rehengjyS Plan or an: The City of Tamarac
Comprehensive Plan, as adopted by Ordinance No. 0-90-2 on January
24, 1990.
Hearings.
d. DOAH.: The Florida Division of Administrative
e. In compliance or into _comta gDge: Consistent with
Sections 163.3177, 163.3178 and 163.3191, Florida Statutes,
Section 187.201, Florida Statutes, the South Florida Regional
2 9e-"L/1.D
.s
Policy Plan, as adopted by Rule 29J-2, Florida Administrative
Code, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative
Code.
f. Notice: The notice of intent issued by the
Department to which was attached its statement of intent to find
the plan not in compliance dated March 23, 1990.
g. petition: The petition for administrative hearing
and relief filed by the Department on March 28, 1990, that
initiated proceedings before DOAH in this case (Case No. 90-
1892).
h, Remedial ACtion: A remedial plan amendment,
submission of support document or other action described in the
statement of intent or this agreement as an action which must be
completed to bring the plan into compliance.
J. ReEgdial Rlan Amendment: An amendment to the plan
or support document, the need for which is identified in
this agreement, including its exhibits, and which the City must
adopt to complete all remedial actions. Remedial plan amendments
adopted pursuant to this agreement must be consistent with and
substantially similar in concept and intent to the ones
identified in this agreement or be otherwise acceptable to the
Department.
j.Stg1tement of intent: The statement of intent to
find the plan not in compliance dated March 23, 1990.
k. The studies, inventory maps,
surveys, data, inventories, listings or analyses used to develop
2
Fa- /Y/
and support the plan adopted by the City on January 24, 1990.
2. Entire agreement. This is the entire agreement between
the parties and no verbal or written assurance or promise is
effective or binding unless included in this document.
3. &orovdl by aoverning_body. This agreement has been
approved by the City governing body at a public hearing
advertised in a quarter -page advertisement published
approximately 14 days prior to the hearing in the manner
prescribed for advertisements in Section 163.3184(15) (c), F.S.
This agreement has been executed by the appropriate City officer
as provided in the City's charter or other regulations.
4. Changeg in law. Nothing in this agreement shall be
construed to relieve either party from adhering to the law, and
in the event of a change in any statute or administrative
regulation inconsistent with this agreement, the statute or
regulation shall take precedence.
5. Other persons unaffected. Nothing in this agreement
shall be deemed to affect the rights of any person under the law
other than the parties.
6. Attorney fees and c2Lts. Each party shall bear its own
costs, including attorney fees.
7. Public Records. The City shall allow public access to
all documents, reports, papers, letters or other material,
subject to the provision of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes,
prepared or received by the City in conjunction with this
agreement. It is expressly understood that upon receipt of
3
0
,i9- 50 /y;
,substantial evidence of the City's refusal to comply with this
provision, the Department will have the right to terminate this
agreement for breach.
S. Liability. The City hereby agrees to hold harmless the
Department, to the extent allowed and required by law, from all
claims, demands, liabilities and suits of third persons or
entities not a party to this agreement arising out of, or due to
any act, occurrence, or omission of the City, its subcontractors
or agents, if any, that is related to the City's performance
under this agreement.
9. EffectiM2 Qate. This agreement shall become effective
upon the last date of signing by the parties.
W
10. Purpose of Part-J. The parties enter into Part I of
this agreement in a spirit of cooperation for the purpose of
avoiding costly, lengthy and unnecessary litigation and in
recognition of the desire for the speedy and reasonable
resolution of disputes arising out of or related to the plan.
11. Department Rowers.The Department is the state land
planning agency and has the power and duty to administer and
enforce the Act and to determine whether the plan is in
compliance.
12. Exhibits. Exhibits A and B are hereby incorporated by
reference. In the event of conflict between Exhibit A and
Exhibit B, the provisions of Exhibit B shall control.
4
le- 9a-if,
13. Adoption Of Rlan and support docum=%. The City
provided the support documents and adopted the plan by ordinance
at a properly advertised public hearing held on January 24, 1990.
14. After
reviewing the adopted plan the Department issued its notice and
statement of intent to find the plan not in compliance, and filed
the petition in this case to that effect.
15. Standing_tofile notice and petition. The Department
met the requirements of Section 163.3184(8), Florida Statutes,
because it participated in the adoption public hearing and based
its determination of compliance and its notice and statement of
intent only on its written objections and recommendations to the
plan pursuant to Section 163.3184(6), Florida Statutes, or on any
changes made by the City to the plan as adopted.
16. Negotiation of agreement; intent. Subsequent to the
filing of the petition the parties conferred and agreed to
resolve the issues in the petition, notice and statement of
intent through this agreement. It is the intent of this
agreement to resolve fully all issues between the parties in this
proceeding.
17. Dismissalrecommendation. If the City completes the
remedial actions required by this agreement, including the
adoption of required plan amendments as set forth herein, the
Department shall request that the Administration Commission enter
an order dismissing this proceeding without imposing any sanction
that might otherwise be imposed under the Act. Thereafter, the
5
Department shall take every action necessary to effectuate this
paragraph.
18. Filina and continuance. This agreement shall be filed
with DOA by the Department after execution by the parties and
shall constitute a joint request that DOAH continue this
proceeding for a time sufficient to allow the parties to complete
their responsibilities under the agreement.. However, the
Department may request DOM to schedule a hearing of this
proceeding at an earlier time, as provided in this agreement.
19. Both parties
hereby retain the right to have a final hearing in this
proceeding and nothing in this agreement shall be deemed a waiver
of such right.
20. Descr ptign _21 provisions notin_compliance and
remed_„jj actions; legal effect of agreement. Exhibit A to this
agreement is the statement of intent and contains a description
of the plan provisions found not in compliance by the Department
and remedial action needed to bring the plan into compliance. It
also constitutes an admission and stipulation by the Department
that if the described remedial actions are accomplished the plan
will be in compliance. Exhibit B contains additional detail
regarding some provisions not in compliance and remedial actions
needed for compliance. In the event of a conflict between
Exhibit A and Exhibit B, the provisions in Exhibit B shall
control.
21. emed' cons' The
1 `.
1 ' ,
e- 9a- /y/
City agrees to adopt by formal action of its governing body all
remedial actions described in Exhibit A (as modified by Exhibit
B) no later than the time period provided for in this agreement.
qc
22. Within.&
days after the effective date of this agreement the City shall
deliver to the Department, after a transmittal public hearing
pursuant to Section 163.3184(3) of the Act, all remedial actions,
including all remedial plan amendments and support documents,
along with a transmittal letter describing the remedial action
taken for each part of the plan amended, including references to
specific portions and pages.
23. Review of transmittal. The Department shall provide
the City with its objections, recommendations and comments on the
remedial amendments and support documents in the manner provided
in Chapter 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code, and Subsections
163.3184(3)-(7), Florida Statutes. If the City fails to deliver
or rejects any remedial plan amendment or support document
described in Exhibit A or Exhibit B, the Department may move for
a final hearing for this proceeding as provided in Paragraph 19
above.
24.
Within 60 days after receipt of the Department's objections,
recommendations and comments, the City shall consider for
adoption all remedial plan amendments and amendments to the
support document, and deliver the amendments and a transmittal
letter to the Department as provided in Subsection 163.3184(7),
ri
310- /'/ 11
1
Florida Statutes, and Rule 9J-11.011(3), F.A.C. The letter shall
describe the remedial action adopted for each part of the plan
amended, including references to specific portions and pages.
25. Review 21 adORtions and ngtice of int2nt. Within 45
days after receipt of the adopted remedial plan amendments and
support documents, the Department shall issue a notice of intent
pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, for the complete
comprehensive plan, as amended, in accordance with this
agreement.
a. If the adopted remedial actions
are consistent with the recommendations in Exhibit A or Exhibit
B. the Department shall find the plan and plan amendments in
compliance and shall request that DOM relinquish jurisdiction
and join the Department in requesting that the Administration
Commission adopt a final order dismissing this proceeding.
b. : If the remedial actions are
not adopted, or are not consistent with and substantially similar
to the recommendations in Exhibit A or Exhibit B, the Department
shall issue a notice of intent to find the plan not in compliance
and shall forward the notice to DOM for a hearing as provided in
Subsection 163.3184(30)0 Florida Statutes, and request that the
matter be consolidated with the pending proceeding for a single,
final hearing. The parties hereby stipulate to that
consolidation and to the setting of a single, final hearing. The
Department may also move for a final hearing of this proceeding
as provided in Paragraph 19 above. In any proceeding under this
s
1
lP-9o_ i 41/
paragraph, the City shall have the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence that an adopted remedial, action is
consistent with and substantially similar to the recommendations
in Exhibit A or Exhibit B.
26. WaJM2r. The parties waive any right to appeal or
initiate proceedings on, or to otherwise challenge on any ground
in any forum, the plan as amended, so long as the provisions of
this agreement are complied with. Both parties reserve the right
to appeal the inclusion of any amendment to the plan that is not
included in this agreement.
27. Concurrent amendment. Nothing in this agreement shall
be construed to prohibit the amendment of the plan concurrent
with the adoption of this agreement.
28. Purposo_of Part -II. The parties enter into Part II of
this agreement to provide funding to assist the City to undertake
the remedial actions necessary to bring the adopted plan
submitted pursuant to Subsection 163.3167(2), F.S. and Chapter
9J-12, F.A.C. into compliance.
29. Availability of „Funds. Payment of state funds pursuant
to this agreement is subject to and conditioned upon the total
release of authorized appropriations from the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning Assistance Program provided by Chapter 88-
555, Laws of Florida. The State of Florida's performance and
obligation to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an
annual appropriation by the Legislature as noted in Section
/P FD—/C//
287.0582, Florida Statutes.
a. As consideration for work performed under this
agreement, the Department agrees to pay a fixed fee of up to
$1,000.00. Payment will be based on the payment schedule
contained in paragraph 31 below.
b. Use of Funds: Funds may not be used for the
purchase of equipment, fixtures, or other tangible property of a
nonconsumable and nonexpendable nature with an expected useful
life which exceeds the duration of this contract. Funds may also
not be used for attorney fees.
31. Method of Payment.
peliverable Due Date Payment
Proposed remedial action
Adopted remedial action
Total
No later than 60 $ 500.00
days after execution
of agreement
No later than time $ 500.00
frames specified in
s. 163.3184(7), F.S.
for transmittal of
adopted plan amendments
$ 11000.00
The first payment will be made by the Department after
receipt of the deliverable which will be verified by the
Department to include all required proposed remedial action. The
final payment will be made after receipt of the adopted remedial
actions and issuance by the Department of a Notice of Intent to
find the plan in compliance.
10
. _,
-0P-90-/Z/,
32. A di% Requirements.
a. The City agrees to maintain adequate financial
procedures and adequate support documents to account for the
expenditures of funds under Part II of this agreement.
b. These records shall be available at all reasonable
times for inspection, review, or audit by state personnel and
other personnel duly authorized by the Department. "Reasonable"
shall be construed according to circumstances, but ordinarily
shall wean normal business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., local
time, Monday through Friday.
C. The City shall also provide the Department with
the records, reports or financial statements upon request for the
purposes of auditing and monitoring the funds awarded under Part
II of this agreement.
d. The City shall include an accounting of these
funds under Part II of this agreement in the local audit prepared
by the City of the 1989-90 and 1990-91 fiscal years.
e. In the event the audit shows that all or a portion
of the funds provided under Part II, were not spent in accordance
with Chapter 9J-26, Florida Administrative Code, and the
conditions of this agreement, the City shall be held liable for
repayment to the Department of all funds not spent in accordance
with these applicable regulations and agreement provisions within
thirty (30) days after the Department has notified the City of
such noncompliance.
f. The City shall retain all financial records,
11
9a -
supporting documents, statistical records, and any other
documents pertinent to Part II of this agreement for a period of
three years after the date of submission of the final
expenditures report or, if an audit has been initiated and audit
findings have not been resolved at the end of three years, the
records shall be retained until resolution of the audit findings.
33. Modification of PaI:t_II. Either party may request
modification of the provisions of Part II of this agreement.
Changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be made by written
correspondence from the Department, by the parties and
incorporated as part of this agreement.
This agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed
to by the parties.
12
e-Ya-iyf
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this
agreement to be executed by their undersigned officials as duly
authorized.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
AFFAIRS
Thomas G. Pelham
Secretary
Date
Senior Attorney
13
CITY OF TAMARAC
Attest:
City Clerk"
City Attorn
q
EXHIBIT "A"
•TATL" OF PLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF CONX=TY AFFAIRS
IN RE: CITY OF TAXARAC
COMPRFHENSIVE PLAN i
ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE i
No. 0-90-2 oa i
January 24, 1990 ;
DOCKET 310. •6-NOX-0628- (N)
The Florida Department of Community Affairs hereby issues
its Statement of Intent to find the Comprehensive plan of the
City of Tamarac, adopted by Ordinance No.0-90-2 on January 24,
1990, Not In Compliance based upon the Objections,
Recommendations and Comments Report issued by the Department on
March 13, 1989, which is hereby incorporated by reference, and
changes made to the plan, as adopted, which were not previously
reviewed by the Department. The Department finds that the plan
is "not in compliance," as defined in Section 163.3164(1)(b),
Florida Statutes (F.S.), because it is not consistent with
Sections 263.3177 and 163.3178, F.S., the State Comprehensive
Plan, the South Florida Regional Policy Plan or Chapter 9J-51
Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), for the following reasons:
I. c
-AL ZEUTBUTTY
A. Inconsistent provisi2ris. The following provisions in
the plan are inconsistent for the reasons described below:
1. The Plan is not financially feasible because the Five-
Year Schedule of Capital Improvements does not contain the
estimated costs for three of the traffic improvement projects and
six of the traffic improvement projects are unfunded. In
addition the project description is not provided for the fifth,
sixth, and eighth items listed in table VIII-1. Rule 9J-5.016(4),
F.A.C.
2. The Capital Improvements Element does not include an
assessment of the local governmentfs ability to finance capital
improvements based upon anticipated population and revenues
including projection of operating costs considerations required
pursuant to 93-5.016(2)(f)5., F.A.C.
3. policy 3.2 does not identify an implementation program
or activity and does nbt specify any criteria that will be used
by the City to measure "satisfactory." Rule 9J-5.016(3)(c), F.A.C.
4. policy 3.5 does not identify an implementation program
or activity and refers to the issuance of Certificates of
Occupancy rather than the issuance of development orders and
permits as required by Section 163.3202(2)(g)r F.S.
5. In policy 4.2 reference is not made to the issuance of
development orders as required by Section 163.3202(2)(g), F.S.
6. In policy 4.3 reference is not made to the issuance of
development orders as required by Section 163.3202(2)(g), F.S.
7. A policy establishing criteria that will be used by the
City to evaluate capital improvement projects for the
accommodation of new development and for redevelopment needs is
not included. Rule 9J-5.016(3)l.e., F.A.C.
E
I
e. A policy establishing criteria that will be used by the
City to consider financial feasibility during the evaluation of
capital improvement projects is not included. Rule 93
5.016(3) (c)1.f., F.A.C.
9. A policy establishing criteria that will be used by the
City for the consideration of the plans of state agencies and the
South Florida rater Management District during the City's
evaluation of capital improvement projects is not included. Rule
9J-5.016(3)(c)1.9., F.A.C.
10. Policy 4.1, which establishes Level of Service
standards, is inadequate for the following reasons in relation to
Rule 9J-5.016(3)(c)4., F.A.C.:
(a) The standard for drainage does not include a
specification for the duration of the storm event;
(b) A potable water standard for Tamarac Utilities East
is missing.
11. The plan does not contain a policy ensuring the
availability of public facilities to serve developments for which
development orders were issued prior to the adoption of the
City's Comprehensive Plan as is required by Rule 9J-
5.016(3)(c)5.1 F.A.C.
12. Policy 1.5 (page 25) does not consider the extent to
which the City can use revenues from traffic impact fees (Policy
2.1) to mitigate development impacts on the state and county
highway system. Rule 93-5.016(3)(09., F.A.C.
13. The Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements (Table
CIE-20, pages 30 and 31) does not contain the. following items
3
listed in policy 1.3 (page 44) in the Sanitary Sewer, Solid
Waste, Drainage, Potable Water and Groundwater Aquifer Recharge
Element as required by Rule 9J-5.016(4)(a)I., F.A.C.=
(a) For sanitary sewers, in the TUE service area, four
;! fw .,•..".. a+%4.40rs into the Broward County system (FY 1986-89) .
Ar W-- r
(b) For sanitary'sewers, in the Tamarac Utilities (TUW)
service area, twenty-nine pumps at sewage pump stations-
(c) For drainage, flashboard risers and telemetry at
three drainage pumping stations.
(d) For potable water, improvements in the treatment
plant.
14. The general locations of the projects listed in Table
CIE-20 (pages 30 and 31) are not provided because Map CIEM-1,
mentioned in the text.(page 30) is not included. Rule 9J-
5.016(4)(a)1.a., F.A.C.
B. Becorrended r2redial ac&iOnl- These inconsistencies may
be remedied by taking the following actions:
1. Revise the,Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements
to include a project description, the estimated costs for all
projects, the year they will be funded and the funding source so
that the needed improvements will be available concurrent with
the impacts of development.
2. Revise the Capital Improvements Element to include the
projection of operating costs considerations to support an
assessment of the local government's ability to finance capital
improvements.
3. Include a policy specifying an implementation program or
activity, based on relevant data and analysis, to address the
4
requirements outlined in policy 3.2.
4. Include a policy specifying an implementation program or
activity, based on relevant data and analysis, to address the
requirements outlined in policy 3.5.
5 and 6. Revise policies 4.2 and 4.3 to reference the
issuance of development orders and permits as required by Section
163.3202(2)(g),, F.A.C.
7. Revise the plan to include a policy establishing
criteria that will be used by the City to *valuate capital
improvement projects for the accommodation of new development and
for redevelopment needs as required in Rule 9J-5.016(3)1.e.,
F.A.C.
S. Revise the plan to include a policy establishing
criteria that will be used'by the City to consider financial
feasibility during the evaluation of capital improvement projects
as required by Rule 9J-5.016(3)(c)1.f., F.A.C.
9. Revise the plan to include a policy establishing
criteria that will be used by the City for the consideration of
the plans of state agencies and the South Florida Water
Management District during the City's evaluation of capital
improvement projects as required by Rule 9J-5.016(3)(c)1.9.1
F.A.C.
10. Revise policy 4.2 to be consistent with the Level of
Service standards established in other elements of the Plan.
11. Revise the plan to include a policy, based on relevant
data and analysis, to ensure the availability of public
Fi
facilities to serve developments for which development orders
were issued prior to the adoption of the City*s comprehensive
plan which conforms to the requirements of Rule 9J-5.016(3)(c)5.,
F.A.C.
22. Expand policy 1.5.to include consideration of the use
of City impact fee revenues to mitigate development impacts on
the state and county highway system.
13. Revise Table CIE-20 to reflect the need to reduce
existing deficiencies, provide for replacements and most future
needs as identified in other elements of the Plan.
24. Include Map CIEM-1 showing the location of each capital
improvements project listed in Table CIE-20.
__. LEYZL OF SEROICE
A. Inconsistent 12romisions. The inconsistent provisions of
the plan under this subject heading are as follows:
1. The Infrastructure Element does not include a policy
establishing levels of service (LOS) for solid waste, potable
water, and drainage as required by 9J-5.01l(2)(c)2., F.A.C.
2. policy 4.1 in the Capital Improvements Element which
establishes the level of service standards for sanitary sewer and
potable water does not set sanitary sewer and potable water LOS
standards for the Tamarac Utilities East Service Area and the
Broward County Service Area. Rules 9J-5.011(2)(c)2. and 9J-
5.016(3)(c)4., F.A.C.
3. Policy 4.1 in the Capital Improvements Element which
establishes the LOS standard for drainage only'includes a
standard for canals and does not establish a city -hide standard
for all drainage facilities pursuant to 93-5.011(2)(c)2. and 91-
5.016(3)(c)4.. F.A.C.
B. Reemended rgmedial actions. These inconsistencies may
be remedied by taking the following actions:
2. Revise the Infrastructure Element to include a policy
which establishes level of service standards for solid waste,
potable wateri -and drainage.-
2. Revise Policy 4.1 to include level of service (LOS)
standards for sanitary sewer facilities for the entire City
jurisdiction by adding sanitary sewer and potable water LOS
standards for the Tamarac Utilities East Service Area and the
Broward County Service Area that are consistent with the
respective LOS standards included in the Infrastructure Element.
3. Revise Policy 4.1 to include a city-wide drainage LOS
standard for all drainage facilities. The IAS standard should
include both water quantity and water quality components.
A. . The inconsistent provisions of
the plan under this subject heading are as follows:
1. The Broward County plan and The City of Tamarac plan are
inconsistent in their designation of a parcel of land in the
southwest corner of the City, located along the west side of the
Sawgrass Expressway. The current County plan designates the
property for utilities while the City plan designates
a small portion of the property for utilities and the balance
7
A
for recreation and open space. Mule gi-5.006(3)(b)1.0 F.A.C.
B. g2gonnended renedial actions. This inconsistency may be
remedied by taking the following actions:
1. Revise the plan to include a coordination mechanism to
resolve the issue of the referenced conflicting designations.
A. InCgDsJat2nt pEovislon. The inconsistent provision of
the plan under this heading is as follows:
1. The plan does not include a floodplain map as required
pursuant to Rules 9J-5.006(1)(b)3. and (4)(b), F.A.C..
B. . The inconsistency can be
remedied by implementing the following:
1. Revise the adopted plan to include a legible floodplain
map as a part of the Existing and Future Land Use Map Series.
V. INTRAITRpCTPRE
A. . The inconsistent provisions of
the plan grouped under this subject heading are as follows:
1. The following policies are inadequate in relation to the
requirements of Rule 9J-5.011(2)(c), F.A.C., for the reasons
cited below:
(a) policy T-1 does not identify an implementation program
or activity that will be used by the City to "monitor" and does
not indicate how the act of monitoring will ensure the
availability of public facilities.
(b) The Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements does not
contain many of the improvements referenced in policy 1.5 as
being on the Schedule.
(o requireefers to development orderstor permitspbecissued
and
does not raga
8
. - _- _ - - _. .. - .le- 9a-15,41
only if facilities and services are availabile to meet adopted
level of service standards concurrent With the impacts of
development, as required by Section 163.3202(2)(Q). F•S.
2. The plan does not contain a policy describing
implementation programs or activities for establishing priorities
for replacement, correcting existing facility deficiencies and
providing for future facility needs. Rule 93-5.011(2)(c)1•,F.A.C.
3. Map s5M-1 is of such poor quality that the geographic
service areas cannot be determined. Rule 9J-5.oil (1)(e)2., F.A.C.
4. The plan does not contain an analysis of soil surveys for
areas served by septic tanks and an explanation of suitability of
those soils for such facilities is not included. Rule 9J-
5.011(1)(f)4., F.A.C.
5. Map SDM-1 is of such poor quality that the drainage
divides between the C-14, C-13 and C-42 drainage basin cannot be
determined. Rule 9J-5.011(1)(e)2., F.A.C.
6. The facility capacity analysis within the C-13 Drainage
Sasin (page 15) does not indicate existing and projected
surpluses and deficiencies based on land use and population
changes, the adequacy of the current level of service, condition
and expected life of the facilities, impact on adjacent natural
resources or an analysis of problems and opportunities for
replacement and expansion. Rule 93-5.011(1)(f), F.A.C.
7. policy 1.2 (page 44) establishing a Level of Service
standard for drainage facilities specifies a frequency�(10-year
9
storm event) but not a duration and is, therefore, not complete.
Rule 9J-5.011(2)(c)2.c.,7.A.C. _ •
9. Map pWM-1 is of such poor quality that the geographic
service areas cannot be determined. Rule 9J-5.011(1)(e)2•, F.A.C.
9. The plan does not specify the design capacity of potable
water facilities in the TUE and Broward County Utilities Service
Area. Rule 9J--5.011(1)(e)3., F.A.C.
10. The plan does not contain data and analysis describing
the existing potable water levels of service provided in the TUE
Service Area and Broward County Utilities service areas. Rule 91-
5.011(1)(e)5•, F.A.C.
11. The facility capacity analysis (page 20-25) for the TUE
and Broward County Utilities Service Areas does not include
surpluses and deficiencies for existing conditions, the initial
increment of the planning period and the remaining increment of
the planning period. Rule 9J-5.011(1)(f), F.A.C.
B. Reconnended Renedial Actions. These inconsistencies can
be remedied by taking the following actions:
1. Revise policy 1.1 to specify the way in which
implementation and monitoring programs or activities will be
conducted. Ensure consistency between all policies and the
Capital Improvements Element. Revise Policy 1.7 to ensure
consistency with the requirements of &.163.3202 (2)(9), F.S.
2. Include a policy, based on relevant data and analysis,
that specifies implementation programs or activities to address
20
establishing priorities for replacement, correcting existing
facility deficiencies and providing for future facility needs.
3. Revise Map SSM-1 to clearly depict the geographic
service areas.
4. Expand the data and analysis 'to include an analysis of
soil surveys for areas served by septic tanks and an explanation
of suitability of those soils for such facilities.
5. Revise Map SDM-1 to clearly indicate the drainage
divides within the City.
6. Expand the data and analysis to include a complete
facility capacity analysis for the C-13 Drainage Basin,
7. Revise Policy 1.2 to specify a complete drainage level
of service standard by including a storm event frequency and
duration.
S. Revise Map PWM-1 to clearly depict the potable water
geographic service areas.
. .9. Expand the data and analysis to include the the design
capacity of potable water facilities in the TUE and Broward
County Utilities Service Area.
lo. Expand the data and analysis to include the existing
potable water levels of service provided in the TUE Service Area
and Broward County Utilities service areas.
11. Expand the data and analysis to include surpluses and
deficiencies for existing conditions, the initial increment of
the planning period and the remaining increment of the planning
period for all service areas.
21
■.. _ .
A. . The inconsistant provisions of
the plan grouped under this subject heading are as follows:
1. The plan does not adequately address and further the
!Ire►l I nwi "a Mato Comprehensive Plan goals and policies (Rule 9J-
5.021(1), F.A.C.):
(a) Goal 8 (Water Resources), Policies Be 10, 11, because
the plan does not include levels of service standards for
potable water and sanitary sewer for the entire city
jurisdiction.
(b) Goal 18 (Public Facilities), Policies 6, 7, 9,
because the plan is not demonstrated to be financially
feasible.
(c) Goal 21 (Governmental Efficiency), Policies 1, Be
because the plan does not demonstrate coordination with the
county in the designation of land needed for utilities.
(d) Goal 26 (Plan Implementation), Policies 6, and 7,
because the plan does not further the plans of the State and
the South Florida Regional Planning Council.
B. Recommended Renedial Actin. These inconsistencies can
be remedied by taking the following actions:
1. Revise the plan to include objectives and policies that
are consistent with and further the above referenced goals and
policies of the State Comprehensive Plan.
A. Inconlistent Rrovisionrt. The inconsistent provisions of
the plan grouped under this subject heading are as follows:
1. The plan does not adequately address and further the
following goals and policies of the South Florida Comprehensive
Regional Policy Plan. Rule 9J-5.021(1), F.A.C.:
12
(a) Goal 8 (water Resources), Policies 37.1.7, 38.1.1,
because the plan does not include levels of service
standards for potable water and sanitary sewer which cover
the entire City jurisdiction.
(b) Goal 17 (Public Facilities), Policies 60.1.2, 60.1.3,
because the plan is not demonstrated to be financially
feasible.
(c) 4oai 20 (Governmental Efficiency), Policies 66.1,
66.1.3, 66.1.6. because the plan does not demonstrate
coordination with the County in designating land needed for
utilities.
(d) Goal 25 (Plan Implementation), Policies 74.1.2, 74.1.4,
because the plan does not further the south Florida
Comprehensive Regional Policy Plan.
B.Becomnended remedill actions. These inconsistencies may
be remedied by taking the following actions:
1. Revise the adopted comprehensive plan to include
specific, measurable objectives and policies, supported by
adequate data and analysis, that are consistent with and further
the above referenced goals and policies of the South Florida
Regional Policy Plan.
Plan.
sA�J
1. The plan is not consistent with the State Comprehensive
Z. The plan is not consistent with the South Florida
Regional Policy Plan.
3. The plan is not consistent with Chapter 9J-5, F.A.C.
4. The plan is not consistent with Sections 263.3177 and
163.3178, F.S.
5. The plan is not "in compliance," as defined in Section
163.3184(1)(b), F.S.
13
6. In order to bring the plan into compliance, the City
may complete the recommended remedial actions described above or
adopt other remedial action that eliminate the inconsistencies.
Executed this Z 3'_ day of March, 1990, at Tallahassee,
Florida.
24
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
Qlaw
Paul R. Bradshaw
Division Director
Division of Resource Planning
and Management
2740 Centerview Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
5'0 - /Y/
EXHIBIT "B"
These are the Remedial Plan Amendments required to bring the
Plan into Compliance. (CODING: Language striekeA=through is
a deletion from existing test; language underlined is an
addition to existing text.
I. CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
REVISION:
I. Table VIII-1 has been revised as follows:
(NEW)
Table VIII-1
Capital Im rovements Needs: Citv of Tamarac 1989-1994
^rc'4►.irb�cY on Year Es cost Vundin'S Program
Commercial v UnTu"—Red s 108,700 Broward County
Prospect Intersection
Commercial Blvd 31 St Unfunded $ 21,740 Broward County
Ave Intersection
Commercial Blvd Rock 1990 $ 48,900 Broward County
Island Intersection
Commercial Blvd at SR7 Unfunded S 5,435,000 FDOT
Grade Separation
University Blvd from MP 2010 $14,851,000 Broward Count
Commercial to NW 61 St Commerc a o Sou a e
Ave Intersection
eermmere#al-Bivd-€,er,-64 UnkRewR ul-LkAAWA- Brew&Ed- County -
Ave to 46th Ave
Prespeet-€EGFR-NW-al-Ave Ne Improvements Broward Eevaty
to Eeraere#al
Beeal Real Emprevements 96-94 $--978=;89 lffipaet-Fees
New Lift Stations 90--94 $ 688,000 CIAO Funds
Drainage: C-14 90-94• $ 40,000 Drainage Fees
for Retention
Acquire And Develop storm 90-94 $ 260,000 Drainage Fees
Detention Areas
Raw Water Wells 90-94 $ 750,000 CIAC Funds
Improvements to Existing 90-94 S 920,000 Utility Revenue
Water Distribution Lines
Water Plant 90-94 $ 2,000,OOp CIAC Funds
Public Works Complex 90-94 $ 2,500,000 Bond Issue
Sports Complex 90-94 $ 52,530 Recreation
Impact Fees
. e- 5'0- i$.,(/
2. New Table vill-5 is added. This text is also added to
page VIII-07:
The Cit 's anticipated capital needs and operating costs
caused an c a ed o ula�'on rowth can be 11nance2'
w e anticipated revenue stream.
3. ftltey-Sr2
4.
S.
In oeeerdasee with state law and eeead pel#e#es
of € Beal MaaageJReatT the etty shall Ma#ataas
satis€aeaery ratios of Revenue be General
161&98e#eA beads-r debt serv#ee to reveRUST and
Overall tadebtedaess be the property tax beset
PoliSy 3.2
The Finance Director recommends that the
sTiall u�iiize a de ra o =n die Cit owin
ran ec e: 1 55 Ca ja ' 288ca Ufa TH ou'�` e
ann n period. Ther`1990 a ratio -Is 174.88
per -Capita. -�
'Policy 3.5
The City of Tamarac shall require to be installed or
install, all needed public facilities for development
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
-"Development orders shall be issued P2 the City
n accor ante wifH--the` armed concurrent
mane Omen sus ,em and"` wiT 163.3-202 2 F.S.
POliC,y 4.2
The City of Tamarac shall ensure adequate facility
Capacity is available or will be available when needed
prior to the issuance of a -building permit r To do so
the City may approve a propposal, reject a proposal, or
require that a development be phased in accordance with
availability of specific facilities or services as
provided in this element.
Policy 4.2
The City of Tamarac shall ensure adequate facility
capacity is available or will be available when needed
prior to the issuance of a development order.
"Development orders shall be issue the C
n accor ante wi — the 2-3°t ed "� eoncurrency
mans emen s s em a`ncT- witIF-163.3202 2
�.....Z�,q)
To do so tteCity may approve a proposal; =eject a
proposal, or require that a development be phased in
accordance with availability of specific facilities or
services as provided in this element.
Fa
a CA C5
N
to
!9 n 1
C � � f
f
f
r
r
1
v
0 1
r.. IJ + • v r r r r r f O
f
fH
fx
fn
w �•+,
pp
0 0
�r oilM
GOP V1 O Y�
Lh th y¢i
Vf f
f �
f
N
f
N
Co
_
Im
w w ft W
w trp q
d+ w y
W a- co
N l H O
O
f !v 1
O w wwr
wwr
•.. Ii�
r tv
1
f
f
N N W
/ CA wr
C y
O44
w wr Qp
1
OC • w
cc 0
O � y w $w
in
N N N w OVOi
W%&Aw
w 1
1 (q
l
..
f
•
1
� M W
�p
1 Vf w
O► 1.h � ��p7 W
p" �'' �
In
�1 � � �
N
i N
O �. y r " •
. . �
H+ f !� off
O V N cc
co Ch
G rr
N W �1
14i 1
f
f H
f x
w
O
W1
f to
f
f
f
N
f
•I+t
+�
Cc�'
N
� 1 w
V �Q
W • + • * 4
N I.n 1p
r f a�j ti ftD
.t r
,e- 90-1 vj
6. Policy 4.3
Requests for development. permit or Land Use Plan
amendments shall be reviewed to examine what affect upon
the public facilities the request shall have per the
following criteria:
A. Whether the proposal is consistent with,
supports or contributes to the achievement of the
goals and objectives in this plan.
B. Whether it affects any existing condition of a
public facility as outlined in the Traffic Circula-
tion Element, Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drain --
age, Potable Water and Natural Ground Water
Recharge Element, and Parks, Recreation/Open Space
Element.
C. Can the plan amendment or proposed development
be provided with the necessary public facilities
that are planned in the 5-year schedule of
Improvements.
D. Whether the proposal conforms to the Future Land
Use Map of the Future Land Use Element.
E. Whether the plan amendment or development is in
conformity with county, state agencies and water
management district's plans and those of other
regulatory agencies with management or regulatory
authority.
"Development orders shall be issued hy the City
In: actor ante wi£F— the �ea concurienc
man�emen sus em anc� wite•"163.3202 2 F.S.
7. Policy 4.44
The City En ineerin and Community Development
E—epartments w establish cr er a du�r ng 1990
w is a =v willee oy evslua- Te—3�aI
ca
l�m-rovemen ro ecs to accommodate new development
and redevelopment needs. No redeye o men nee s
have been ld-e-n-tTfied."nor a e
ucre eve T
ex ecteFeMs
s
rnthe anne:T es�-criteeria W_=be usedsnua su-2r
process.
8. Policy 4.5
The Finance Director will review all ro osals
TOr capital get
ects an3w`ilIma e a
recommen a7ion to ty Rana er concern�n ` the
C yLs a t `to finance sucproposals.
recommendation �a11 n a rev ew of {�Ye`
0 ow n - --
1. ability to use im act fees
3
e- 5o
F
2. ability to use an existing revenue stream
3. assessment 'off Like o0 0 9 in2 a bond
a roved by Tamarac voters
4. availabiliU v grant --Tunas
9. Policy 4.6
"D�e following
the 1p.arming period, the Ci� shall use
e ��ollow n �cr3�eria�or tieions der�To-n o7
TFe p ins of state a encies an a ouTR
Florida water Management District dur�n "EFe
ems`"" evaluation o ca tal dement ro ects."
hThese-` c ndude-Ue fo_ ow ng:
1. nre ect is needed nded b the cit •
��,._ i
ro ec has u"unc�sava available a eto agency;
and
an
required —'local match. — meet
L
10. Policy 4.1
The City of Tamarac shall use the following LOS
standards in reviewing impacts of development upon
public facilities.
Sanitaa Sewer
Tamarac Utility West - 131 gpcd
Solid Waste
6.2 - pounds per capita per day
Drainage
Maximum elevation - 10 year storm event - 10.0' MSL
Potable Water
Tamarac Utilities West - 144 gpcd
Roadways
1. The minimum Level of Service (LOS) standard for the
State Highway System:
a. Freeway LOS - "D"
b. Principal (Limited Access Facilities) LOS "D"
C. Minbr Arterials - LOS "D".
2. County arterial roadways, LOS standard "D".
3. County collector roadways, LOS standard "D".
4. City collector roadways, LOS standard "C".
4
Recreation Standards for Facilities
Facility
Baseball/Softball
Soccer
Tennis Courts
Golf Courses
Recreation Center
Bicycle/Pedestrian Trails
Shuffleboard
PolicX 4.1
Per 1,000 Po .
1/6,000
1/20,000
1/2,000
2/50,000
1/50,000
1 mi/1,000
1/3,000
The City of Tamarac shall use the following LOS
In reviewing impacts of development upon
w rrr�auuLu7
public facilities.
Sanitar Sewer
Tamarac Utility West -- 131 gpcd
Tamarac Utility East - 50 Spcd
#rower 'County - 120 90
Solid Waste
6.2 - pounds per capita per day
Draina.0 e
Maximum elevation - 10 year storm event - 10.0' MSL,
three day storm, with u2 to 48 hours of
standing -water allowed TFe reten on an�r
treatment s dardsfor urban run Off whicFi are
promulqa ed an m eme�ed' �br BrowarT—Co___un�" EQCB
shall e the standard or tTie C3�y of Tamarac.
Potable Water
Tamarac Utilities West - 144 gpcd
Tamarac Utilities East - 56 gpcd
Browar Co^ uny" - 117 gpca'
Roawaays.
1. The minimum Level of Service (LOS) standard for the
State Highway System:
a. Freeway LOS - OD"
b. Principal (Limited Access Facilities)
C. Minor Arterials - LOS "D".
2. County arterial roadways, LOS standard "D".
3. County collector roadways, LOS standard "D".
4. City collector roadways, LOS standard "C".
5
LOS "D"
9o-/$4/
Recreation Standards for Facilities
Facility
Baseball/Softball
Soccer
Tennis Courts
Golf Courses
Recreation Center
Bicycle/Pedestrian Trails
Shuffleboard
Recreation Standards for Land
Per 1,000 Pop.
1/6,000
1/10,000
1/2,000
1/50,000
1/50,000
1 mi/1,000
1/3,000
1.5 ikcxss of public open apace land per 2000 population
3.S acres of private open space land +/or facilities,
including recreation buildings; up to 15 percent of this may
be met by golf course land.
11. Policy 4.6
Public facilities to serve developments for which
eve o men or ers were issue r or � aFe`
doptio_n_ o? --- The Tamarac Com re ensive Plan,
ro�vi ear F ose deveIo mend orders meet a�I
provisions v�fhe Lan Developmen re Zations,
shall e avaMable The Concurrensy Mana emen
5 as identifled Tn ` the Tamarac Coe o
Or nances" �as�rea y rovides of r ��facc ties
mon or n and kev-e menpermit monitor n whic
i;ill ensure availability as require ur ng the
Inning perio .
12. Policy 4.7
teiit� of Tamarac traffic im act fees shall onl
be used or c s ree s.Since Brow— Coun
oolle�—s re �__i�__�o�n�aa traffic m act fees for tFe Y
Count roads sstem the sFial�ot also
coiTect Feesor'hose same roads. sUaf"e
roa s in Tamarac are covered b the re MR51
_e' . s�Ystem�=' nod" eJ_9 bTe`�" f or �fy mpac
�s .
13. Polite 1.3-(Sanitary Sewer Element)
Provide the facilities listed below within the period
indicated by including them in the five year Capital
Program and as appropriate in the annual Capital Budget:
-IT Evaluate for repair or repleeement pumps at
19 sewage pump stat#ess+ NeleT BA= 2A&7 67
-77 ;A7 8; 97 *97 U}7 U A7 &97 I37 a47
14A7 14B7 i67 &77 217 227 & B8T
gT Modify €laskbeard risers at the three
drainage pump4Ag statieAe to autematte knife
gates and #Astall telemetry in eaek station
to meter paMg87 the elevation of the
6
0
interior and a-*4 eamais
remote starting of puMpsT
8T Expand the eapacity of
NOT 8 through 9 to 98A
and to provide
e-
for
Potable water wells
9TpTMT
4T eenstruet or have constructed a new €eree
m8iil and PUMP Stat#en NOT 45 S 4; iR Land
section 9 & i6B % 48 &R band Seettea 8
when wastewater servies fe required for new
development using impact €eeav
Policy 1.3 Sanitary Sewer Element)
New Lit Stations using CIAC funds
Drainage C-14 retention using drainage fees
Ac ire and Develop StormDetention Areas using
rrainage Fees
Raw Water Wells
Improve Existing Water Distribution Lines
Water Plant Im rovements
14. New M�.aPP VIII-5 Location of Coital Improvements
eET ncl u end'. _
II. CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
LEVEL OF SERVICE REVISIONS
1. Policy 1.2 lInfrastructure Element
The following level of Berviee iL99} standards
are hereby adeptedt
The bevel of Service standards {Les+ standards
are hereby adopted*
The Cit
dof Tamarac shall use the following Los
Sanitary Sewer
Tamarac Utility
Tamarac Utilitv
Browar County
Solid Waste
West - 131 g cd
f ast - 50 c cc
_ T10- 0cc
6.2 _ ounds per capita per day
Drainage
Maximum elevation - 10 year storm event - 10.0'
MSL, hree aY storm, with up fo 48 hours- BF
Mn`din water �a lowed. THe `retention` anU
rem" atmennt s standar s or urban run off wh3cFi
F
e_ Fo- '0�41j
are promulgated
shall —be
and
-THe-standardfor
implemented
ki
Broward
`die�HT
T
Tamarac.
Potable Water
Tamarac Utilities
West - 144 9�ed
sacTaaU - 56 g_
Browar Co_ un y - Q �gpcd
2. See 1. #10, above for revisions to Policy 4.1
3. Policy 4.1 (Capital Improvements Element)
The City of Tamarac shall use the following LOS
standards in reviewing impacts of development upon
Public facilities.
III. CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION REVISIONS
1. A revised Tamarac Land Use Map, regarding the parcel of
land in the SW corner of land Section 7, north of
Commercial Blvd and west of the Sawgrass Expressway, is
consistent with the Broward County Land Use with respect
to this parcel.
IV. CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FLOODPLAIN MAP REVISIONS
1. Floodplain Map (Map #IV-6) is included herein.
V. CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT REVISIONS
Policy 1.1
1.W. The city will monitor population growth and the
growth of business and industry to insure that essential
capital facilities are available when needed.
Policy 1.1
"Through its concurrent management, system, as
a_o�c p ee_d' in its Land lo men o e In Janary ua
1 a 90, the Cif w= monitor a row h of
a "-'
ulat"�o`n, u�ld=ng"- permits- an cer icaTes of
occu anc �T e� concurrency management s stem
en es the s ci c procedures or measur_`n
facility ca aci�an or eva uat� —service
ava Ta�ilitaQa ��t �emand.
1.(b). The reference in the Notice of Non -Compliance is
incorrect. The reference is to Policy 1.3.
Policy 1.3 SSanitary Sewer Element)
New Lift Stations using CIAC fug
8
2-Fo-JV/
Drainage C-14 retention, using drainage fees
Acquire and Develop Storm Detention Areas using
rra� n�a a fees .
Raw Water Wells
Im rove Exit water Distribution Li�nes,
Water Plant improvements
Policy 2.7
I.M. The City will continue to collect the drainage
improvement fee, enforce it's Development Standards and
Criteria requiring drainage approval prior to approval
Qf a Development Permit and other code requirements
pertaining to drainage.
Policy 2.7
The City will continue to collect the drainage
improvement fee, enforce it's Development Standards and
Criteria requiring drainage approval prior to approval
of a Development Permit and other code requirements
pertaining to drainage. "Development permits may be
issued .onl if faci i ies an sery ces are
available tD meef the adopted Iev"el o—servrce
s an ar s -"`concurred with EFie impacts_ of
eevelo ment, as requir s.163.3202 (2) (9l,
F.S. -
2. Policy 1.a
The Public works, Utilities and Community Development
Departments shall compile information on facility
demand, capacity, and reserve capacity as development
orders are issued. Annual summaries of capacity, demand
and reserve capacity for each facility and service area
shall be presented to City Council.
Policy 1.a
The Public works, Utilities and Community Development
Departments shall compile information on facility
demand, capacity, and reserve capacity as development
orders are issued. Annual summaries of capacity, demand
and reserve capacity for each facility and service area
shall be presented to City Council. "There are no
existing deficiencies which need to Be corrected.
B—asecs on the data contal�ned ;n THis a e_ men
TF�e ca��ta_l im rovemen p_. anning PP.r.oc�ess as
Meentif3ed� the Cap al Im ro ev men�remen�;
w con inu`e tone -THe vehic a or iden�'viniz
new u ure n_eeds`an3_for=enti?-Vfn the means
Tor proviaing or THe new u ure needs if n�
'areaTT specified in the adop�ee�i Ca}
Improvement E emen ."
9
/Z - Vo - / .V/
SANITARY SEWER SUB -ELEMENT
3.
4.
Map SSM-1 is deleted.
Map IV-4, Utilities Service Area Map is included herein.
To be added to page IV-03:
"North of Commercial Blvd., along Prospect Road,
Tn Tama—rac Laces, 74 residences are serve
re htanks. The so s are Ma' rga�Urban
om ex and ImmokoTee Urban- tom lex. A compe e
escr tion o soils chaza-Heris`ticss rounn "
e Con —se rvaTion Elemen f. This n—U hl5orhoodlis
build-outWhile the sze�ETic an cs are
Mnctora n its- the Cit�'Mention � sewer
'the area `-'though no�witMi Lh j Ela�g
eriod.'w
DRAINAGE SUB -ELEMENT
S.
6.
Map SDM-1 is deleted.
Map IV-6- Drainage Basin Map is added.
The following language is added to page IV-15:
"The drainage structures in the C-13 basin in
amarac are adequate or —the exist n� oration
an and uses. The service area is virtually
uenit-ou now, wM vacant an i accommodate
_on� Yy 110 residence-an�14 acres of commercial
ttelo meet. Site ins are re —curved o mee
c yy an Browar —�Coup� Water Resources Mana emen
Division s e cat oonns��will—xes will —respect o ra na e.
The expected e e tFie�"`fac��s excee s e
'panning erioU. - Since no ex ans on Is ex e-ce`d,
there -Is no mpacy -"on 7 acen na urn resources.
7. Policy 1.2 linfrastructure Element)
The following level
are hereby adeptedt
The Level of Serviee
are hereby adeptedt
of Service {F,98; etaadarde
Standards *Los+ eeaadards
The City of Tamarac shall use the followingLos
sfanaar s:
Sanitary Sewer
Tamarac -tilit West - 131 cdd
Tamarac UtfI�Y Eat - 50 gPcd
Browar�c Co_ un y - 120 c7C
Solid waste
6.2 - j2ounds per capita per daX
10
e - ga_ i4//
Drainage
Maximum elevation - 10 ear storm event - 10.0'
SL Three � storm X!-"r uup to 48 hours o�
sl ndin water a owed. The "`relent- and
rea ment standards or urban run o w c are
Bromul ed and lamented
b Browarcu Cu CB
testanaroFe sa e yt o Tamarac.
Potable Water
Tamarac Utilities West - 244 cmcd_
Tamarac es Iasf - 56 gpc
r. ° oun I - 11' lwg�ca
POTABLE WATER SUB -ELEMENT
S. Map PWM-1 is deleted.
Map IV-4 replaces Map PWM-1 and is included herein (was
included in adopted plan, as well).
9. To Page IV-18, the following language is added:
"The capacity of the Fort Lauderdale water system
T-70 MGD and` "'-will` remsln a s levelthrFi ough
THe ear 201 ' T E — demand —represents
;p5roximately .0028 er��cenT of -fhis capacitv.
ea eman �by HO C�£vof art Lauderdale'an
ifs` contract �3_ arges `�s not expected �o
exceed 60.450 MGD in —Fie ear 2010 or 86.4
er�cen_t of Canac�f. — Compre_hens ve -Man ,—City oT
Fort Laudeerda e; _1�988. )) The es7gn ca ac y of
Fie- Browar C.ou_ntYPant which serves this�area
Ts ` 10.7 MGD throu Fi_Fie ear 2000. Tamaracs =
aemanc3" re xesen s wo ep rcenT oT the demand
on the County system.
10. The following language is added to page IV-18 of the
Potable Water Sub --Element:
The existing level of service for potable water
=n TUE is 56 9pc .
11. The following language is added to pages IV-20 and Iv-21
of the Potable Water Sub -Element:
There are no existina deficiencies for Potable
a er in the planning er o All T_rovemen s
needed are for uporaaIF2 or new service.
VI. CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY WITH
STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISIONS.
1.(e). Policy 4.1 of the Capital Improvement Element
and Policy 1.2 of the Infrastructure Element have been
revised to include the levels of service standards for
Potable water and Sanitary Sewer for entire city
jurisdiction.
11
(b) Table VIII- 1 has been revised as shown at Section
I.1. of this agreement and is now financially feasible.
(c) The Tamarac Lend Use Map has been revised to be in
conformance with the Broward County Land use Plan Map as
shown at Section 111.1 of this agreement. The Plan is
consistent with Goal 21, policies i and 5.
(d) Tamarac Land Use Plan Map has been amended as shown
at Section I11.1 of this agreement. The Plan is
consistent with Goal 26, Policies 6 and 7.
VIII. CITY OF TAMARAC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY WITH .
REGIONAL POLICY PLAN REVISIONS
PnlA l-y 4.1 of the Capital Improvement Element and
Policy 2.2 of the Infrastructure Element include
levels of service standards for potable water and
sanitary sewer which cover the entire jurisdiction.
(b) Table VIII-1 of the Capital Improvement Element has
been revised as shown in Section I.I. of this
agreement and is now financially feasible.
(c) The Tamarac Land use Map has been revised to be in
Conformance with the Broward County Land Use Plan
Map as shown at Section III-1 of this agreement.
The Plan is consistent with Goal 20, Policies 66.1,
66.1.3., and 66.1.6.
(d) Tamarac Land Use Plan Map has been amended as shown
at Section III.1 of this agreement. The Plan is
consistent with Goal 26, Policies 74.1.2 and
74.1.4.
12
NEW
H
h
O
e
yy
2M
C �
d
N AI
le- To-/,
on
i�
O
1
1 � v
• rr ,71
' r
1•
• � 4
r
t
m
N
es
N
re
N
a
N
ic
i .�
'�+
4 •4g1�lyL
.
.
w
.
�� go-iV/