Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-90-274Temp. Reso. #5950 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. R-90- A 7� A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 224-3FOR WOODMONT GARDENS PRO- JECT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SEC- TIONS 10-2 THROUGH 10-29 OF THE TAMARAC CODE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the application for a revised development order by the applicant for development approval; and whzxEAs, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development order dated December 13, 1989, and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in compliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development that is subject of the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That the application for a one (1) year extension for Phase 1 and for a four (4) year extension for Phase 2 site plan for Woodmont Gardens is approved subject to the following conditions: A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one (1) year from December 19, 1990 for Phase 1 and four (4) years from December 19, 1990 for Phase 2. If the development does not commence construction within this time period, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. Temp. Reso. #5950 C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised development order are set for as follows: lAlom- SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other por- tions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned shall become effective immediately upon its passage. Ek- PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this /9 day of � , 1990. ATTEST: CAROL A. EVANS CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved this ion as to for4n-" ALAN F . RUIN, CITY ATTORNEY �ALrt� 11 i��r1�1A1I MAYOR RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE MAYOR ABRAMOWITZ DISTRICT 1: C/M ROHR DISTRICT 2: C/M SCHUMANN- DISTRICT 3: V/M HOFFMAN DISTRICT4: C/M BENDER /��