Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-80-129Temp. # 145 Introduced by: � CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. 'A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING HOUSE BILL 647 PERTAINING TO CONSUMER PROTECTION BOARDS IN CHARTER COUNTIES. WHEREAS, Consumer Protection Boards serve as initial agencies to settle problems between vendors and vendees, and WHEREAS, each instance where such a Board is able to resolve a consumer.problem is potentially one less instance where a party will seek judicial redress of his grievances. and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the taxpayers of the State of Florida to minimize the dockets in the Courts, and WHEREAS, Consumer Boards also have the ability to deal with consumer problems involving small amounts of money and consequently allow the parties with legitimate grievances, who are not able to invest in Court filing fees, to get results, and WHEREAS, Consumer Boards act as impartial decision makers in consumer complaint situations, and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the people of the State of Florida for said Boards to have authority to determine civil penalties, and WHEREAS, House Bill 647 would give Consumer Protection Boards the authority to determine civil penalties to be imposed for violation of certain orders of such Boards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: For the reasons set forth in the Whereas clauses above, the City of -Tamarac supports House Bill 647 and encourages the members of the Florida Legislature to enact same. SECTION 2: A copy of this Resolution shall be forwarded to each member of the Broward County Legislative Delegation, to the Broward County League of Cities and to the Florida League of Cities. SECTION 3: This Resolution shall become effective immediately. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this O day ofX ,1980. 145 1 2 3 r 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 `7 _8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 0 1 32 33 34 35 36 ATTEST: LER I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved the form and correctness of this RESOLUTION MAYOR: CITY ATTORNEY v DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE