HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-72-053X
This RESOLUTION was
introduced by�
7 2 - 0 ;2 9 CITY OF TAMARAC , FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A PROPOSAL OF TAMARAC
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY TO LIMIT DENSITY AS
PROPOSED IN CONSIDERATION OF CITY ACCEPTANCE
OF COUNTY HEIGHT MAXIMUM, MINIMUM LOT SIZE,
LACK OF SEA WALL REQUIREMENT, AND ALL OTHER
COUNTY ZONING OR ORDINANCES NOW IN EFFECT IN
THE EVENT OF ANNEXATION.
WHEREAS, the Tamarac Development Company has proposed a
development which lies partially within and partially without the
City limits, and
WHEREAS, the City of Tamarac must on or before August 4, 1971
determine whether or not it wishes to object to the pending zoning `-
application before the Board of County Commissioners of Broward
County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE City c.a
rvu r"`J
of Tamarac, Florida:
SECTION 1: That the City of Tamarac accepts the proposal of
July 18th, 1972, of Tamarac Development Company, with the density
limits attached thereto.
SECTION 2: That, in the event of the annexation of the
subject lands, the City agrees to honor the County requirements as
set forth in the letter.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS day of.c..-a
- �� L•% 1972.
ATTEST:
C LERK.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have Y,
approved the form and Mayor Seltman
correctness of this Resolution Vice Mayor Lange
Councilman Johnson 1' 6-se.r'� CC
Councilman Shultz A'JF-
CI ATTORNEY......,. Councilwoman MassaroG,
TAMARAC DEVELOPMENT CQ_MPANY
a subsidiary of
Behring Corporation
July 18, 1972
Honorable Harvey Ford
City Attorney
Tamarac City Hall
Tamarac, Florida 33313
Re: Section #4 Land Use as to County Zoning
Application #58-Z-72 and Contiguous Lands
in the City of Tamarac
Dear Mr. Ford:
Pursuant to discussions held by representatives of Behring Corporation
and the City of Tamarac on July 17, 1972 at your Workshop Meeting,
l am pleased to advise you of the company's position with regard to the
above zoning applications both as to lands in the County and in the City.
Enclosed you will find three itemized breakdowns on the land use evaluation
of the subject property both as to the portion located in the City of
Tamarac and that located in the unincorporated area of the County, to-
gether with a third evaluation which combines the first two.
At the present time we have zoning applications pending with Broward County
and with the City of Tamarac as to those portions of this property under
WCn
the jurisdiction of the appropriate governmental agency. We are asking
the City of Tamarac to cooperate with us in securing zoning as applied for
in the County as well as the zoning as applied for in the City of Tamarac.
In furtherance of this request, we are prepared to commit to the enclosed
density maximums as to total units in each residential category as well as
to total number of acres in each residential category. This commitment,
therefore, would carry with it the total units involved in the lands situate in
'ttij
the City of Tamarac and those in the unincorporated area, and of necessity,
therefore, the total for the entire 857.40 acres. This commitment further,
therefore, would include the net density per acre and the gross density per acre.
Our commitment as set forth above is predicated upon the City of Tamarac
passing an appropriate resolution before August 4, 1972 agreeing that in the
continued -
I
To: Honorable Harvey Ford Page -2- July 18, 1972
event that these lands are annexed to the City of Tamarac, that the
City will honor the zoning acquired on the unincorporated lands and
the density maximums as set forth on the enclosed evaluation sheets.
This would include the height maximums, minimum lot size, lack
of sea wall requirements, and all requirements of county zoning or
ordinances in effect at the time said zoning was approved. We feel
that this agreement will go a long way towards alleviating any fear the
City might have that this company will try and develop . in the unincor-
porated area to a greater density than that which was presented to you
in the July 17th meeting. On the other hand, this agreement would
alleviate the fear of the company that the City would try and limit or
restrict that which we would be allowed to do under County zoning
should the property ultimately be annexed to the City.
Thank you f or your cooperation in this matter and we look forward
to working with you in the future on all matters of mutual interest.
Sincerely,
TAMARAC DEV �LOPMENT COMPANY
Z u f
Evan L. Murphy
President.
ELM/bls
enclosures
ccs: Emerson Allsworth, Esq.
CP
Robert Castenholtz
CZ
Paul Stutsman
�Y�
O. W. Seltman
Dwight E. Johnson
Evelyn M . Lang
Eugene Schultz
Helen Massaro
SECT 4 - TAMARAC
LAND USE EVALUATION
Z. SUMMARY BY TAM) TT4T?
ACRES
Residential 145.57
Gott 85.88
Water 11.30. '
Major Roads 6;65
249.40
Y
II. SUMMARY BY RESIDENTIAL USE AND DEVELOPABLE LAND
ACRES DENSITY
Single Family Detached 8.22 x 3.5
Estate Villas (R-3U) :5.59 x 6.5
Single Family Cluster (R-3U) 27.84 x 8.0
Townhouse (R-3U) 28.98 x 10.0
Apt., Cluster (R-4A) 12.60. x 15.0
Apt., Villas (R-4A) 47.61 x 18.0
Apt., Med Rise (R-4A) 14.73 x 22.0
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPABLE LAND 145.57
Net Density
Golf 85.88
Water 11.30
Major Roads 6.65
GROSS ACRES 249.40
r•
LT:h1
11
Gross Density
PERCENT LAND USE
58.A
34.4
4.5
2.7
100.00 7.
TOTAL UNITS
29
36
223
290
189_
857
324
1948
13.4
7.8
i
i
i
SECTION 4 - BROWARD COUNTY
LAND USE EVALUATION
I. SIWIARY BY LAND USE
ACRES PERCENT LAND USE
Residential 344-17 56.6
Golf 192.94 31.7
Racquet Club 7.00 1.2
Water 36.93 6.1
Major Roads 2. 6_,96 4.4
608.00 100.0 %
II. SUMMARY BY RESIDENTIAL USE AND DEVELOPABLE LAND
ACRES DENSITY TOTAL UNITS
Single Family Detached 19.52 x 3.5 68
Estate Villas (R-3U) 58.28 x 6.5 379
Single Family Cluster (R-3U) 109.61-.x 8.0 877
Townhouse (R-3U) 32.89 x 10.0 329
Apt. Cluster (R-3U) 12,75 x 15.0 191
Apt. Garden (R-3) 23.93 x' 15.0 358
Apt. Villas (R-4A) 30,51 x 18.0 549
Apt Ned -Rise R-4A '`,56.68 x 25.0 1417
Residential Developable Land 344..17 4168
Net Density 12.1
Golf
Racquet Club
Water
Major or Roads
GROSS ACRES
LT:hl
192.94
Y
7.00
36.93
26.96
Gross Density 6.85
I. SUMMARY BY LAND USE
Residential
Golf
Racquet Club
Water
Major Roads
LAND USE EVALUATION
SECTION 4
TOTAL ACRES
ACRES
489.74
278.82
7.00
48.23
33.61
857.40
PERCENT OF LAND Uc
57.1
32.6
0.8
5.6
3.9
100.0
II. SUMMARY BY RESIDENTIAL USE AND DEVELOPABLE LAND
TOTAL PERCENT OF
ACRES DENSITY UNITS RESIDENTIAL
Single Family Detached (R-IC) 27.74 x 3,5 97 5.7
FsPate Vi1? aG (R-1C) 63.87 x � 6:5 ':15 ..
1J.V
.Single Family Cluster (R-3U)-137.45 x 8.0 1100 28.1
Townhouses (RY-3U) .61-87 x 10.0 6.19• i2.6
Apt. Cluster (R-4A) 25.35 x 15.0 380
5.2
Apt. Garden (R-3) 23.93 k 15.0 358 4.9
Apt. Villas (R-4A) r 78:12 x 18.0 1406
15.9
Apt. Med. Rise (R-4A) 56.68 x 25.0 1417 14. 6-
4, Apt. Med. Rise (R-4A) (City) 14.73 x 22.0 324
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPABLE LAND 489.74• 6116 100%
14
Net Density 12.5 u.p.a.
Golf 278.82
Racquet Club 7.00
Water 48.23
Major Roads 33.61
GROSS ACRES 857.40
Gross Density 7.1 u.p.a.
LT: h I
F�� p
A
W
r' REOARDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS MM
OF WMARD'ccutiw, FLORIDA
JACK WHEELER
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT