The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-91-012I Temp. Reso. #5976 2 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA 3 RESOLUTION NO. R-91-_z2_ I A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO.097-4 FOR ST. MALACHY CATHOLIC CHURCH b PROJECT FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 10-2 THROUGH 10-29 6 OF THE TAMARAC CODE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City l Council of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised 9 ivin accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the application for a revised 11 32 development order by the applicant foZ development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated 13 14 the application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations, and 35 the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated January 18, 16 1991; and 17 WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised develop- 16 ment order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and 1 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the appli- 2CI cation is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive 21 Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a 22 Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the subject of 23 the application. 24 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 25 TAMARAC, FLORIDA: 26 SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a 27 revised site plan for St. Malachy gatholic Church, prepared by 28 Arpin and Son Engineering, Inc., revised on September 1, 1990, 29 reflecting the addition of 1,800 square feet of floor area for a 3G vestibule and two confessionals is HEREBY APPROVED subject to the 31 following conditions: 3.1 A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with 3. the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City 34 of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review 35 Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. I; Temp. Reso. #5976 ■ 31 ■ 41 B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from the date of this approval. If the development does r>6 not commence construction within one year, this approval is null 7 and void unless an extension has 1 9 10 1li 12 13 i4 5 6 7 18� 3� 2 3 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 applicable regulations. been granted in accordance with C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised development order are set forth as follows: 1. The landscape buffer be minimum of twelve (12) feet wide and three (3) feet in height. 2. The parking in the front of the building has an additional landscape island. 3. All dumpsters must be enclosed and screened. 4. Approval will be subject and take effect at the time the traffic impact fees are paid and the restrictive covenant is delivered to the City in recordable form. SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned shall become effective immediately upon its passage. M PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this ,,2-3 day of ,1991• 3] ' 3. ATTEST: 33 1 , �'a -CAROL A EVANS 34 CITY CLERK 35 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved this Resolution as to form. ALAN F. CITY ATTOR Y T ORMAN ABRAMOWITZ MAYOR - RECORD OF COUNCIL. V0TE MAYOR.ABRAMOWITZ DI`aTR';C; is CIM ROHR DIS?r ICT3: Vlm FI01-1±1 iN DISTRICT 4: G!M BENDER • 1! r 5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE . TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321 1p TELEPHONE (305) 722.5900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS %HFFT MEMO allDATE Orig. Dev, er / Project 0 _7_: evised Dev. Order ��-�`"��* / c �-�//v•ti `' Master File 1 Location_....-...z00 I� Developer / •/q e9e 4-p r� j Owner ZoningAcres _ �O _ Recompiended DAte for Council Action / 'i Future Land Use Designation 0i N ^4 / Proposed Use DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: Final Site Plan Final Plat _ Revised Site Plan .., X I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan City Planner / s 1 City Engineer Z Z Chief Building Official 15 9/ Fire Chief �� ILI;rJ Comments 5,00- Ole" , 0 0 , 4#41ej II. PLANNING COKIISSION RECOlLAENDATIONS: APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date/%(,/g� DENIAL/Date. Final Site Plan dated Rev Final Plat datedRev Revised Site Plan dated Rev Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan: III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS: APPROVAL/Date, APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date_DENIAL/Date Conments cnnt'd �1 0 C� 0 Page 2 DEVELOPPIENT REVIEW STATut turd LANDSCAPE PLAN: Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS -ZOMIAL Date I 11slr r V. BROWARD COUNTY nrvrinnuruT REVIEW CO MITTEE PORT: app ca e Comments VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEPIENTS/FEES Where applicable): .S U M M A R Y A. lister Ind S2Mr pIU RP.l-ASU�nt City Engineer Approval/Date City Attorney Approval/Date B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants. Stipulations. etc.) Date C. Drains a Retention Fee Mount $ Sx Required/Acres _,_ _ Provided_ Deficiency/Acres X $35.000/Acre D. Drainage Improvement ,�.--'"P-�._. Fee Amount t Project Acreage . X SUO/Acre E. Water 6 Sewer ContribUtign Charges Fee Mount $ Number of ERCs —,,— X F. ERC Review Fee. if more than 10 ERCs Fee Mount $ G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Mount $ Acres Required Provided S/Acre _ — X Deficiency/Acres H. Engineering Fees i. & iFee Amount $ I. Nods Bond Mount S Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney J. On Site beautification (Fees to be paid t time of building permit issuance) Eii•-'^"Ok J/0,/85 X 0.07IS' K. Future Traffic Needs Fees Z 0 r TT // cont'd 11 U E • Pate 3 !tee r vrvr�owr�r �rvtrw sTetus sIff. r7A'-Yt :o►�E�rY Rrvirw Arqummm! A. IOUOt Water Service CertiffCatfon of City Entinear or Conspltfsy City EnStater of Availability pf Sew te: AYAIL04LE ILL It AVAILABLE �._.. MDT Af1AlLAIIE =ate toenentt •• Mette,+rter Treatment and Disposal Service Certification Arof1aD11of MYEntfneer or Contultira rrfte: CcityEnEturRr of 1ty of e AYAIWIE WILL IF AVAILAIIE Sete •—••••� MDT AYAIWL! Comenti C• Solid Witte Pit Dial Service apetere:fast:21t= illty of Service, • AVAILAILE It AYAILABLE..__,. ` site • Comenti MDT AYAIWIE.�,._.` pa Gina ! e�+iCtfors ofy r �` Ajecarquifyaof�Or& aCt10 e: "'Inter Or Comm ry CtRy Enjfaeer of ' AUQuATE MILL SE ADFQtlATE ate --.• Ccnnents NN ADFQRiJTt ..,�..�..� E. Aepional Transportation M/twork Complfante with a Standardit CMLIESWILL CwhY. Mate tonn'enti owl MT CpWLY Compliance with Hi11,11111 nffiam standards: CMIPLIES.__. . WILL CCIiPLY,,�,�� site MsMDT COyPLY Comnenti � f:• fi►e Protection Servtte Compliance with IMA SU%dsrdst CWLIES WILL COMPLY pte Convents M. Polite Protection sorvfee Comp force with Mintowei s�*doNs: LIES • V WILL COwLY Me sOEi 07 CO!/LM Cawenti .. EU-1 ryra (Forks Sad Rticrestfea /xtllttfdi) a"o +Litton BeOutred/Acres J�rov Cash to Line Of Lend --.gross Atniwx. It j� j flAt! +rtth the =tel SCKDDI SITES Mttptp iD r � r r I Letter from school Beard a'Brmdrd fity scuol iiem: T Sta>DpL M krrK 4r-n*^ `- mra[p MY Kroro �1 Peso 4 Site Plan Review: •Revised Site Plan.- s Flat Review: • schoutic Ing.: Other: sTArr c6milTs: P"I'alsed Use Ion 114"At SOW 3 not f Taftrat a Jssd Adoption of savalop""t order For: low Project subject to t WNI consitions: Included to tte Ramri and WO fallawfas 5ee- VF ,f 764 kl, 1. •yi Nil th f2iIi MEMORANDUM TRMRRRC COMMUNITY DEUELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: Planning Commission THRU: Kelly Carpenter, RICP, Community Deuelopment Director FROM: Mike Uonder Meulen, Senior Planner , 11A DATE: January 15, 1991 RE: St. Malachy Catholic Church Reuised Site Plan MF #: 19-77 This memo is a follow-up to the previous staff report. 1. The site is located in a compact deferral area due to overloaded traffic capacities on nearby county roads. The applicant has agreed to add a restrictive covenant on the property so as not to allow the addition to increase the traffic on the county roads. This covenant will restrict the use to a vestibule and two confessionals and will not be used to increase the capacity of • the Church. The above proposed solution is unique to this site and is not to be used as an example to mitigate concurrency. 2. At the Site Plan Review Committee meeting on January 15th the committee recommended approval of the revised site plan with the following conditions: a. The landscape buffer be a minimum of twelve feet wide and three feet in height. b. The parking in the front of the building have an additional landscape island. c. All dumpsters must be enclosed and screened. 3. All requirements from the Fire, Engineering, and Building Departments have already been agreed to. 4. The city traffic impact fee for this project is $290.00. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the revised site plan subject to the above conditions. Cl