HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-91-045Temp. Reso. # 6003
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R--91- T�
A RESOLUTION ISSUING DEVELOPMENT ORDER
NO. 275 FOR ASH PLAT NO. 1 FOR A PLAT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS
10--2 THROUGH 10-29 OF THE TAMARAC CODE;
AND -PROVIDING -AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council
of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in
accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of
the meeting in regarding the review of the application for a
development order by the applicant for development approval;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated
the application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations
and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated
February 13, 1991;and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the development order
and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
application is in compliance with all elements of the Compre-
hensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the
subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION- l: That the development described on the
attached Development Review Statuq Sheet dated February 13,
1991, is granted a development order subject to the following
conditions:
A. The development order is assignable, but an assign-
ment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance
with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any
of the original requirements.
Temp. Reso. # 6003
"Ll
B. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the development order are set forth as follows:
AloA%
SECTION--2: That the following documents are hereby
accepted and approved as a part of this development order:
Development Review Agreement
Blanket Public Safety Ingress/Egress Easement
SECTION 3: Should any section or provision of this
development order be declared by a court of competent juris-
diction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the
other portions of the order remain valid or whether the
approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 4: This development order as conditioned shall
become effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this /.3 day of 1991.
ATTEST:
CAROL A. EVANS
CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
approved this Resolution as
to form.",
ALAN F. NkUF
CITY ATTORNEY
NORMAN ABRAMOWITZ
MAYOR
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR
ABRAMOWITZ
DISTRICT 1:
C/M ROHR
DISTRICT 2:
C/M SCHUMANN
DISTRICT 3: _
V/M HOFFMAN
DISTRICT4:
C/M BENDER
7525 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
Date: February 13,1991
2M Orig. Dev. Order
Revised Dev. Order
Project: Ash Plat No. 1 Master File 23-90
Location: SW corner of McNab Rd. and Proposed Hiatus Rd.
Developer: Simon Ash / EPP tech Assoc. Inc.
Owner: Simon Ash
Zoning: LI-1 Acre: 7.14
Recommended Date for Council Action: February 27, 1991
Future Land Use Designation: Industrial Proposed Use: Industrial
1. DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
FINAL SITE PLAN FINAL PLAT X REVISED SITE PLAN
STAFF APPROVAL DATES:
FINAL SITE PLAN FINAL PLAT X REVISED SITE PLAN
City Planner 2 / 1 2 / 91
City Engineer 2 / 1 2 / 91
Chief Bldg. Official 2 / 1 2 / 91
Fire Chief 2/12/91
Comments
2. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVAL OR X APPROVAL W/CONDITIONS/ 1/16/91 DENIAVDATE
Final Site Plan dated
Final Plat dated
Revised Site Plan dated
Planning Commission findings of compliance with certified Plan: Yes
3. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWING: N/A
APPROVAUDATE AS NOTED APPROVAL AS DEADLINE/DATE DENIAUDATE
Comments
4. LANDSCAPE PLAN: N/A
Staff Action Approval Date Approval w/conditions denial
5. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT:
Comments: See attached
6. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (where applicable)
A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement N/A
City Engineer Approval/Date N/A
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, ect.)
Ingress/Egress Easement Required
C. Drainage Retention: Provided On Site Fee Amount:
5% Required/Acres
Deficiency/Acres X $45,500/Acre
Drainage Improvement Fee Amount: $928.20
Project Acreage 7.14 x $130.00/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges N/A Fee Amount: N/A
number of ERCs x
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount:
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount: N/A
Acres Required Provided
$/Acre x Deficiency/Acres
H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount: N/A
I. Bonds Bond Amount:
40 Date:Approved by City Engineer
(C-4l -yf
City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification N / A
(FEES TO BE PAID AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE)
K. Future Traffic Needs Fee N/A
General Industrial
Table 14, Division 8
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE X NOT AVAILABLE
DATE 2/13/91 COMMENTS
B. Waste Water Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE X NOT AVAILABLE
DATE 2/13/91 COMMENTS
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE X NOT AVAILABLE
DATE 2/13/91 COMMENTS
D. Drainage Adequate N/A
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage
ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQUATE
DATE COMMENTS
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
DATE COMMENTS
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards: N/A
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
DATE COMMENTS
H. Police Protection Service N / A
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
40 COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
r
DATE COMMENT
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N / A
Land Dedication Required/Acres Provided
Cash in lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $
J. School Sites
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: N/A
SCHOOL SITE NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SCHOOL SITE NEEDED FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL
SCHOOL SITE NEEDED FOR HIGH SCHOOL
8. PROCESSING FEES (PAID)
Site Plan $
Revised Site Plan $
Plat Review $1 ,500
Schematic Eng $
Other $
STAFF COMMENTS:
Proposed development i5/is not in general conformance with Tamarac's
Land Use Plan Element and recommends.
Adoption of Development Order Master File#23-90
#9
For: