HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-86-255Introduced by �� Temp. Reso. #4214
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-86- Sa l
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A REVISED DEVELOPMENT
ORDER FOR MIDWAY PLAZA PROJECT. REVISED
DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 176-2 AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIYE MTEz__
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City
Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has
been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the
date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of
the application for a development order by the applicant for
development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated
the application, staff and Planning Commission recommen-
dations, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet
dated July 1, 1986; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Development Order
and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
application is in compliance with all elements of its Compre-
hensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development
that is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SEIQN 1: That the development described on the
attached Development Review Status Sheet dated July 1, 1986
is granted a Development Order to proceed subject to the
following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with
the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to
the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the
Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering
drawings.
_1_
TEMP. RESO. #4214
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer
than one year from the date of this approval. If the
development does not commence construction within one year,
this approval is null and void unless an extension has been
granted in accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The Development Order is assignable, but an assign
ment-does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance
with the Order unless the City Council consents to modify any
of the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the development order are set forth as follows:
NONE
E I 2: Should any section or provision of this
Development Order be declared by a court of competent juris-
diction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if
the other portions of the Order remain valid or whether the
approval shall be null and void.
SECIDI 33: This Development Order as conditioned shall
become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED th
1986.
ATTEST:
CITY CLE$X Y
I HEREBY CERTIFY that'I have
approved -the form and correct'
ness of this RESOLUTION.
CITY"AT RNE
1505568 /p
W 41SY7
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR: HART
DIST. 1: C/w MASSARO
DIST.2: C/IV.-TEL.ZER
DIST, 3: C/iv! tat:i i"TEaMA(V
DIST. 4: V/M STEIN - --
-2-
5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC. FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722.5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMO #
DATE 7 1 86
REVISED SITE PLAN FOR MIDWAY PLAZA FOR MINOR REVISIOrig. Dev. Order
Bldg. A dimension from 92' to 84', Revised dumpster Revised Dev. Order (76
Project at NT& Ret;;il P, Revised Well I oratinn Master File # 11-84
at NW 79 Ave., Minor parking island adjustment and Landscape revisions
Location
NW corner University �-r -d—rTJ 7757 S
Developer PROPERTY SYSTEMS, INC
Owner PROPERTY SYSTEMS, INC.
Zoning B-2 Acres 22.8 Recommended pate for Council Action 7/9/86
Future Land Use Designation Commercial Proposed Use Shopping Center
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES:
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Building Official
Fire Chief
Comments
Final Plat Revised Site Plan X
Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan
II. PLANNING COMMISSION REC01;1ENDATIONS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated •,�„` Rev
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS:
DENIAL/Date
APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/pate - DENIAL/Date
Comments
cont'd
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN:
Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL
Date
V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT:
If applicab e
Comments
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES Where applicable): SUMMARY
A. Water_ and Sewer Developer Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development A reement (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount $
5% Required/Acres Provided
Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount $
Project Acreage X $130/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount $
Number of ERCs X $1000
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount $
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount $
Acres Required Provided
$/Acre X Deficiency/Acres
H. Engineering Fees
Fee Amount $
I. Bonds Bond Amount $
Date: Approved by City Engineer � City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
cont'd
Page 3 Memo #
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHE
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Sftrvice:
AVAILABLE L, WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B.
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting
City Engineer of
Availability of ,Service:
AVAILABLE !/ WILL BE AVAILABLE
NOT AVAILABLE~
Date Comments
C.
Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination ryF Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE
NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
D.
Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting
City Engineer of
Adequacy of Dra' age:
ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE
NOT ADEQAUTE
Date Comments
E.
Regional Transportation Network
Compliance wit"
it inimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F. Local Streets and,,Roads
Compliance with/�inimum Standards:
COMPLIES v WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
bate Comments
G. Fire Protection rvice
Compliance wit inimum Standards:
COMPLIE5 WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
H. Police Protection,;Service
Compliance with inimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) /
an De cation Required/Acres Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $
J. 5chpol S.j.Jes
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
is
" " " MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
go of It
" HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET +