HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-86-256Introduced by V Temp. Reso. #4212
CITY 0 TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-86- 2
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A REVISED DEVELOPMENT
ORDER FOR FAIRHAVEN, SECTION 11, PROJECT.
REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 144-1; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE„ DATE,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City
Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has
been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the
date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of
the application for a development order by the applicant for
development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated
the application, staff and Planning Commission recommen-
dations, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet
dated June 27, 1986; and
WHEREAS, the city Council reviewed the Development Order
and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
application is in compliance with all elements of its Compre-
hensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development
that is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the development described on the attached
Development Review Status Sheet dated June 27, 1986 is
granted a Development Order to proceed subject to the
following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance'with
the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to
the City of• Tamarac as described in Section II of the
Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering
drawings.
_1_
TEMP. RESO. #4212
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer
than one year from the date of this approval. If the
development does not commence construction within one year,
this approval is null and void unless an extension has been
granted in accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The Development Order is assignable, but an assign
meet does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance
with the Order unless the City Council consents to modify any
of the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the development order are set forth as follows:
NONE
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this
Development Order be declared by a court of competent juris-
diction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if
the other portions of the Order remain valid or whether the
approval shall be null and void.
SECTIQN_ 3: This Development Order as conditioned shall
become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this
1986.
(ATTEST:
CITY CLERK( 't
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
approved the form and correct-
ness of this RESOLUTION.
115055486/p
-2-
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR: HART Ce
DIST. 1: C/W MASSARO
DIST. 2: C/M STELZER
DIST. 3: C/M GOTTESMAN �� l
DIST.A: V/M STEIN
Qt� 5 0. 56, gs� I I
5811 NORTHWEST 86TH AVENUE 0 TAMARAC
TELEPHONE (305) 722.5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
FLORIDA 33321
MEMO # �
DATE 6/27/86
Orig. Dev. Order
REVISED SITE PLAN FOR FAIR14AVEN 11 TO ADD 144-1 Revised Dev. Order
Project Master File # 9-79
Location parcpl R- MAINLANDS OF_TAMARAC UNIT 11 - 5700 NW 84_Terr.
Developer FAIRHAVEN 11 MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION
Owner FAIRHAVEN 11 MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION
Zoning S-1 Acres Recommended Date for Council Action 779/86
Future Land Use Desi.gnation,Open Space/Recreation proposed Use Recreation Area/
`CTUnbb se
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan .
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES:
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Building Official
Fire Chief
Comments
Final Plat Revised Site Plan X
Final Site Plan.._ Final Plat Revised Site Plan
II. PLANNING COflISSION RECO:1; iENDATIONS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date 7/2/86 DENIAL/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated Rev
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS: .
APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date DENIAL/Date
Comments
cont'd
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN: / Y
Staff Action APPROVAL __ PPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL
Date
V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEI4 COM14ITTEE REPORT:
If app icab e
Comments
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY
A. Water and Sewer D elo er Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development A reement (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
C. Drainage Retentign Fee Amount $
5% Required/Acres Provided
Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount $
Project Acreage X $130/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contributtinn Charges Fee Amount
Number of ERCs X $1000
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount $
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount S
Acres Required Provided
$/Acre X Deficiency/Acres
H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount E
I. Bonds Bond Amount $
Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
cont'd
Page 3 Memo #
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHE
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RE UIREMENTS:
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of service:
AVAILABLE ,/. — WILL BE AVAILABLE. NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of.
Availability OfjService:
AVAILABLE _ -/� WILL BE AVAILABLE ___� NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
C. Solid Waste Dispo al Service
Determination o Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE --•— WILL BE AVAILABLE . NOT AVAILABLE..--
Date Comments
D. Drainage Adequacy
Certification of C ty Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of Drai ge:
ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE _ NOT ADEQAUTE
Date Comments
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with/minimum Standards:
CO � COMPLIES WILL COMPLY ,,.�.�.� DOES NOT COMPLY
--
Date Comments
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with inimum Standards:
COMPLIES. WILL COMPLY _ DOES NOT COMPLY
bate Comments
G. Fire Protection Ser ice
Compliance with M' imum Standards:
COMPLIES---- WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
H. Police Protection S rvice
Compliance with imum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) M1
an a cation Required/Acres Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land __� Gross Acres Max. X /AC = $
J. chool Sites
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR.ELEMENTARY SCHOOL _ NOT NEED D
" MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
" HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated
Page 4
DFVF1 OPMFNT DMITrl.i C,-A,r,,..
- .. Jncci
VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: $
Revised Site Plan: $ 50
.00
Plat Review: $
Schematic Eng.: $
Other: $
STAFF COMMENTS:
Proposed development is/i ywpt in general conformance with Tamarac's Land
Use Plan Element and recommends:
Adoption of Development Order # �_ Master File # —�9-70 For:
nnRA
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
g
Staff recommends approval of the revised site plan.
49