HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-86-104Introduced by Temp # 4063
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION R-86-4-o
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A REVISED DEVELOPMENT
ORDER FOR THE CALIFORNIA FEDERAL SAVINGS &
LOAN ASSOCIATION PROJECT. REVISED DEVELOP-
MENT ORDER NO. 126__-1 AND PROVIDING AN
EFFE TI E DATE
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City
Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has
been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the
date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of
the application for a development order by the applicant for
development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated
the application, staff and Planning Commission recommenda-
tions, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated
March 20,1986; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the development order
and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the
application is in compliance with all elements of its Compre-
hensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development
that is the subject of the application. _
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
19ECTION 1: That the revised development described on
the attached development review status sheet dated March 20,
1986 is granted a development order to proceed subject to the
following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with
plans and specifications submitted by the developer
to the City of Tamarac as described in Section II
of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved
engineering drawings.
VU
-1-
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer
than one year from the date of the approval. If
the revised development does not commence constru-
ction within one year, this approval. If the
revised development does not commence construction
within one year, this approval is null and void
unless an extension has been granted in accordance
with applicable regulations.
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from
strict compliance with the order unless the City
Council consents to modify any of the original
requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to
issue the development order are set forth as
follows:
/t) 0 4) ('--"
SE_QTION,---2: Should any section or provision of this
development order be declared by a court of competent juris-
diction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if
the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the
approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 1: This revised development order as condi-
tioned shall become effective immediately upon passage.
() L)
ne=
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this C*_ day of
1986.
MAYOR i
ATTEST:
�2�
CITY CLtRK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
approved the form and correct-
ness of this RESOLUTION.
CITY ATTNNEY
12954131086/p -
-3-
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR -
DISTRICT 1:
DISTRICT 2:
DISTRICT 3:
DISTRICT 4:
()
W7
7AWARAC. FLORIDA 333
I% so -IN AVENUE
$811 lyC)AINWEST 'IELEPHONE 13DS) 722 590D
REVIEV SIATUS SHUT
XVID
DA.71 3/20/86
FINAL SITE PLAN for jZL;.Tje-viSed Dev. Orter
CALIFORNIA FEDERAL_SAVINGS & LOAN rkster file # B-82
Project
Northeast corner Sabal Palm Blvd -East and Rock Island Rd -
Developer California Federal Savinas & Loan
Dwner . California Federal Savings & Loan Action 3/26
zonirg..-� —B-1 Acres Reco-rended rite for Council
B?nk with Drive-Thru
Commercial Proposed VSe
Future Lend List DesignatiDn�------ Tellers
DEVILOPMEN"T DRDER Ttl;t-
rin,al site Plan x
]. SIATF AMOVAL DAIES:
city Planter
City EnZineer
Cbilf Ej4ldin2 Official
Fire O.'.#itf
rinance Director
0
Final Plat , .. Revised Site Plan
rinal Site Plan .. final Plat —Revised S'te F"r-
F1
0
or APPROVAL V11F CosIDJUMS/Date 2/5/86 /Dite
APPRDVAL
Final site Plan dated 1/30/86. Rev
final Plat dated Rev
Itevised site 'Plan dated RPv
Planning CWr, ission finding of CC%rpli&nte with Certified Plan:
see page a of this report
Co?rn-ents
.1 .0
&WROVAL AS REDLINMDAte 3/17/86 /*D1 '- t
cont'd
DrVELoptiro lkrVIEW SIATUS SHM
I V. LANDSCAPE. PLAN:
-StBff Action APPROVAL .— APPROVAL WITH CM11MIS X DEIIIAL
lkttl/17/86
It fication Co-r,ittee 1/20/86
APPROVAL APPXVAL WITM CONDITIONS —L-DENIAL
JPNzRD Mvily IMITIOPMrS"T RMEW Cl"VITIE1 lkrPDPT:
(If applicable)
- Coments
Alreadv Dlatted
IDA%e
L lldk'� :Zoo 0�4re voicwel: 5 v Y t A �Ry
A. Water Ime 51.,,er Ptvel;2er A:rLC1.1)1
City Engineer Approval/Date
City AttorneyApproval/Date
9. Other Develt�-ert 1Lzree-,j-t-s (Covenants, Stipwlations, etc.)
Sewer Easement
Develooer's Sewer Aareement
Public Safety Ingress/Egress Easement
C. Rrair�att Pete-tirr- Fee Amount S N/A
Required/kres Provided Paid at time of platting
Deficiency/A-.res X 335.00WAcre
D. Drairiaze lr-provfsw�eq�t FmAnouni N/A
--MMEMEMOM Pa , at tim� ot platting
Project Acreage X SM/Arre
Water 9 Sewer Cvntrit *4 Fee Amount S 5,591.75
;�!J-tn C tw rots
(sewer)
%nber of ERI'ps 5-15 1 $1,045.00
F.
M Review fee, if Pore tha'� 10 rRcs
Fee
Amount
3
9.
Local Parks/Recreation
Fee
Amount
I
Acres Required... Provided
S/Acre It Deficiency/Acres M ATAF
14. Engineering tees
6� -
3. Itnis
U'o 10. 1
Fee Amzu�mt 450.00 Prepaid
�,399. ALANCE DUE
Bond Amount S 71,132.50
Date: Approved by My Engineer--.. City Attorney _
0. On Site beautifitation 34.00n.16 x .0715
(Fees 1.0 be Plid At tiMe Of building Ptrrit 4910"Ce)
K. Future Traffic Imorovements Fees
L. Future Traffic Sionalization Fees
2.431.01
6.870.19
1.354.40
cont Id
0
A
�,p— 1d4
It
a
F&;e 3
.LrmoPnrNi Rrvirw strwignNTs:
A. Fail -le Wattr Service
certification of City Engineer or Cv,,iswltinj City Engineer of
Availsbility of Servitt:
AVAIUL111 X WILL BE AVAILABLE � NOT AVAILABLE
lute econents
I. Wastevattr Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or ConswItinj City Enitnrer of
Aysilability of Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE ,� WDT AVAIULELT
lute Cc -mints
C. Solid waste Disposal Service
Dettmination of AvIiIAbility of Service:
AVAILASLI WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Batt Coments
Unification of City Engineer or Consulting City fqineer of
Ade;wacy of.Dr,ainsie:
a
ADEQUATE WILL BE ANQUATI � NOT ADEQAUTE
Date carr- ents
"mo #
Re;iDnal Transportation Network
COMPliance with Minimim Standards:
COMPLIES.—. WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Coments I I
F9 Local Streets and Rws
Com-pli,anct with Hinimm Standards:
COMPI I ES - WILL CO11PlY DOES NOT co!rFLY
Date
G. fire Protection Service
CM,;Ii&nCe with MiniftM Standards:
COMPLIES WILL CCMPLY DOES NOT Coll -Ply
Date car-ments
N. Police Protection Strvict
COnPlianct with Minimo Standards:
COMPLIES �< WILL COMPLY DOES Rol COMPLY
be te CWrents
1. LOP-11 Paris (Forks end Itecreation Facilities)
Lana goe:lcation Reqjired/Acres, Provided -m�
Cash in Lieu of Land. Gross Acres Pka. I 5� /AC a S
tar-plionce With the Standards of the IrDward County School ftarg:
SCHOOL SIIES NEEDED IDR ILEMINIARY SCHOOL
MIDDLE SCHOOL wr wErDrD
NISH SCHOOL 'NI NEEDED
Letter frceh School Board Dated
K
bm m
trMOvy-EN1 vrvIEW SIATUS S4M
VIII. PADIPPESSINP10' FIES (PAID):
site Plan Review; 600-00 400-00 (revised)
Revised site 'p-lan:
Flat Review: 1150.00
now ---- W�
Other:
SIATF CDW.Zh*TS:
propc,sed develcp,�rn% is/i*oet in general conforr,&nce with Tarraric' Land
Use plan Element and re.-omends:
Mo;tion of Development Drder 126-1 Nester File # 8-89 For:
CALIFORNIA FgDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN FIUAL 51JE-PIAN
project Subject to the requirvents- included in the Report and the f0ll0winz
conditions:
Staff recommends Council approval of the final site plan.
� M