HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-86-067Introduced by: v PI /`/ _ Temp. Reso. #4011
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-86— (��
A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER
NO. 038-1 FOR A SITE PLAN FOR PHIL HOPKINS RETAIL
ST E• AND PROVIDI A EFFEC I DA
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of
Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accor-
dance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meet-
ing regarding the review of the application for a revised develop-
ment order by the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the
application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations; and the
attached Development Review Status Sheet dated February 20, 1986;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development
order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application
is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan, or
will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for the development that is the subject of the applica-
tion.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC$ FLORIDA:
ECTI 1: That the development described on the attached
Development Review Status Sheet dated February 20, 1986 is granted
a revised development order to proceed subject to the following
conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the
plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of
Tamarac as'described in Section II of the Development Review Status
Sheet and approved engineering drawings.
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one
year from the date of this approval. If the development does not
commence construction within one year, this approval is null and
void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with
applicable regulations.
1
Temp. Reso. #4011
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance
with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of
the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the
revised development order as set forth as follows:
,,A,)6,41 C-
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised
development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other por-
tions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be
null and void.
SECTION _3: This revised development order as conditioned
shall become effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this aLday of 1986.
ATTEST:
CITY LE R
__ 7
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have
approved the form and correct-
ness of this RISOLUTION.
MAYOR
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR: KRAVITZ
DIST 4: C/M STEIN
DIST 3: C/M COTTESMAN
DIST 2: C/rv1 IVIUNIi',Z
DIST 1: V/M MASS RO
100,
sell NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE • TANARAC, FLORIDA :93321
TELEPHONE UDS1 722 SeDD J —�p�
DFVELOP►rNT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMD M q%
DATE 2 2U
Orig. Dev. Order
a -5 evised Dew. Order
PHIL HOPKINS RETAIL STORE FINAL SITE PLAN !tie=ter File N 16-82
Project
Location i bide rQmmerc,j,�l_ply .,gaL of NW 79 Ave (o,d j.US.g.Ljp5a1►L�a►lk ). .
Developer
Owner
Zoning B 1 Acres .89 Recomended Date for Council Action 2/2
6/86
Future Lend Lisp Designation CoLnMercia_ - Proposed l'se ..Betai1 st ye _
DEVELOPIVI'l ORDER FOR:
Final site Plan x_
1. STAFF APPnDVAL DATES:
City Planner •'
City Ennineer
Chief Eu;ldino Official
Fire ►ief
Finance Director
w
Final plat.___ Revised Site Plan
Final Site Plan . Final Plat „Revised Site Plan
I I. PLA'�'+1��� C0'"'!I55I0�� _RFEh.i' �Eti]ATIOyS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL V11TH COwIDITIONS/Date 1/3/86 DVIAL /Cite
Final Site Plan dated Rev 12�„8 ;,,,,,,,r
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated ..ram Rev _ -
Planning Comission finding Cf compliance with Certified Plan:
See Page 4 of this report
117. FINAL TWGINEERINS DaA111ROS:
0
APPR�YAL/Date APPRDVAL AS AEDLI!IED; D&JJT8/86 DE"IIt.LI )a to
CWgM, ents
cont'd
reyr 4L
DEVELOa11EN7 REVIEW STATUS SHEET
or
1V. LANDSCAPE PLAN:
.Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIMS-Z. DMIAL
Date 12/11/85
leautification Corrittee Arc„oendatio!�•De^.e: 12/16/85
APPROVAL . APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS .^.,.DENIM.
V. PUARD CDU'nY DEVELDpmryt RUIN tPIVITTEE REPORT:
(If a pplicable) -_.
- Cements,
Platted P.B. 119 Pg 15
tiI. w«•«iv�n� ;,S;!r!V;7SMES (wore u)Plicable : S L, Y, M R R
A. Water and_ S .+er-Devt1ooer Ito�t new -
City Engineer Approval/Date
Date
City Attorney Approval/Date
8. 0t_4r Develop-ert Aoree-�• (Covenants. Stipulations, etc.)
Drainage Retention Agreement
Public Safety Ingress/Egress Easement
C. Drainage Peter. i n Fee Amount S 1,575.00
514. Required/Acres 0.045 ac Provided -0-
Deficiency/Acres 0.045 X 335.000/Acre
D. Dreine�e 1r*orovew+ent Fee Amount .t 115.70
Project Acreage - 0.89X SM/Acre
E. Water t Sewn Cvrtri � IiU Charges Pee Amount S 31Z40_75 J
Number Of ERCs. 2:9 Water ERC's @ $595.00
1.45 Sewer ERC's @ $1,045.00
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount S
S. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount S
Acres Required Provided
S/Acre X,� Deficiency/Acres
3,949.83 Total
li. Engineering Fees Fee Amount B 750.00 Pre aid
7. Bonds Bond Amount S 10 619:50
Date: Approved by City Engineer.,.--... City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification 631•85
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
K. Future Traffic Needs Fees 1,014.68
L. Future Traffic Signalization Fees 2,401.60
•
cont Id
Faye 3 Memo 1
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SWrrT
DE1.'EIOP71M REVIEW RE UIREM TS.
A. Potable k"ater Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE 2� — WILL BE 'AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B. wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Enginrer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE.. / - WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE �.
Date Comments
C. Solid waste Disposal Service -
Deter4inationof Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL DE AVAILABLE_,,... NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
D. Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of,Drainage:
ADEQUATI WILL DE ADEQUATE _, NOT ADEQUUTE
- i Date Comments
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES. WILL CMP1Y_,.� DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F. Local Streets and Roads
compliance wi h Hinimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL CCt1PLY.,.._— DOES NOT CO"P'LY
Date Commments
S. Fire protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES.,,,,,,,,,• WILL C(XP1Y DOES NOT COTSPLY �-
Date Comments
M. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
i. LMAI Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities)
Lane ;cation Required/Acres Provided
Cash 1n Lieu of Lind .r. Gross Acres PUx. x 5. /AC « S �--�—
J. .�ch^c3
Compliance with the Standards of the froward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITLS NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL W�l NEED
w « • • MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
` ` « ` HISH SCHDDL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated --
Pipe 4
VVELpprENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
VIII. POCESSIH-0 FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: 650.00
'Revised Site Plan: s -
Plat Review: s
Somatic Ens.:
75n-
other: s
STAFF E,MENTS:
Proposed development islisgwt in general conforMance With Tamarac's lend
Use Plan Element and reco mends:
Adoption of Devclor"fit order d 038-1 Master File d iraL. For:
PHI
f
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions: •
Staff recommends Council approval of the Final Site Plan and
Landscape Plan.
i
C�