Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-86-067Introduced by: v PI /`/ _ Temp. Reso. #4011 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. R-86— (�� A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 038-1 FOR A SITE PLAN FOR PHIL HOPKINS RETAIL ST E• AND PROVIDI A EFFEC I DA WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accor- dance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meet- ing regarding the review of the application for a revised develop- ment order by the applicant for development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations; and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated February 20, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the subject of the applica- tion. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC$ FLORIDA: ECTI 1: That the development described on the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated February 20, 1986 is granted a revised development order to proceed subject to the following conditions: A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as'described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. 1 Temp. Reso. #4011 C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised development order as set forth as follows: ,,A,)6,41 C- SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other por- tions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION _3: This revised development order as conditioned shall become effective immediately upon its passage. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this aLday of 1986. ATTEST: CITY LE R __ 7 I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved the form and correct- ness of this RISOLUTION. MAYOR RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE MAYOR: KRAVITZ DIST 4: C/M STEIN DIST 3: C/M COTTESMAN DIST 2: C/rv1 IVIUNIi',Z DIST 1: V/M MASS RO 100, sell NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE • TANARAC, FLORIDA :93321 TELEPHONE UDS1 722 SeDD J —�p� DFVELOP►rNT REVIEW STATUS SHEET MEMD M q% DATE 2 2U Orig. Dev. Order a -5 evised Dew. Order PHIL HOPKINS RETAIL STORE FINAL SITE PLAN !tie=ter File N 16-82 Project Location i bide rQmmerc,j,�l_ply .,gaL of NW 79 Ave (o,d j.US.g.Ljp5a1►L�a►lk ). . Developer Owner Zoning B 1 Acres .89 Recomended Date for Council Action 2/2 6/86 Future Lend Lisp Designation CoLnMercia_ - Proposed l'se ..Betai1 st ye _ DEVELOPIVI'l ORDER FOR: Final site Plan x_ 1. STAFF APPnDVAL DATES: City Planner •' City Ennineer Chief Eu;ldino Official Fire ►ief Finance Director w Final plat.___ Revised Site Plan Final Site Plan . Final Plat „Revised Site Plan I I. PLA'�'+1��� C0'"'!I55I0�� _RFEh.i' �Eti]ATIOyS: APPROVAL or APPROVAL V11TH COwIDITIONS/Date 1/3/86 DVIAL /Cite Final Site Plan dated Rev 12�„8 ;,,,,,,,r Final Plat dated Rev Revised Site Plan dated ..ram Rev _ - Planning Comission finding Cf compliance with Certified Plan: See Page 4 of this report 117. FINAL TWGINEERINS DaA111ROS: 0 APPR�YAL/Date APPRDVAL AS AEDLI!IED; D&JJT8/86 DE"IIt.LI )a to CWgM, ents cont'd reyr 4L DEVELOa11EN7 REVIEW STATUS SHEET or 1V. LANDSCAPE PLAN: .Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIMS-Z. DMIAL Date 12/11/85 leautification Corrittee Arc„oendatio!�•De^.e: 12/16/85 APPROVAL . APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS .^.,.DENIM. V. PUARD CDU'nY DEVELDpmryt RUIN tPIVITTEE REPORT: (If a pplicable) -_. - Cements, Platted P.B. 119 Pg 15 tiI. w«•«iv�n� ;,S;!r!V;7SMES (wore u)Plicable : S L, Y, M R R A. Water and_ S .+er-Devt1ooer Ito�t new - City Engineer Approval/Date Date City Attorney Approval/Date 8. 0t_4r Develop-ert Aoree-�• (Covenants. Stipulations, etc.) Drainage Retention Agreement Public Safety Ingress/Egress Easement C. Drainage Peter. i n Fee Amount S 1,575.00 514. Required/Acres 0.045 ac Provided -0- Deficiency/Acres 0.045 X 335.000/Acre D. Dreine�e 1r*orovew+ent Fee Amount .t 115.70 Project Acreage - 0.89X SM/Acre E. Water t Sewn Cvrtri � IiU Charges Pee Amount S 31Z40_75 J Number Of ERCs. 2:9 Water ERC's @ $595.00 1.45 Sewer ERC's @ $1,045.00 F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount S S. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount S Acres Required Provided S/Acre X,� Deficiency/Acres 3,949.83 Total li. Engineering Fees Fee Amount B 750.00 Pre aid 7. Bonds Bond Amount S 10 619:50 Date: Approved by City Engineer.,.--... City Attorney J. On Site Beautification 631•85 (Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance) K. Future Traffic Needs Fees 1,014.68 L. Future Traffic Signalization Fees 2,401.60 • cont Id Faye 3 Memo 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SWrrT DE1.'EIOP71M REVIEW RE UIREM TS. A. Potable k"ater Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE 2� — WILL BE 'AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments B. wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Enginrer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE.. / - WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE �. Date Comments C. Solid waste Disposal Service - Deter4inationof Availability of Service: AVAILABLE WILL DE AVAILABLE_,,... NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments D. Drainage Adequacy Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of,Drainage: ADEQUATI WILL DE ADEQUATE _, NOT ADEQUUTE - i Date Comments E. Regional Transportation Network Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES. WILL CMP1Y_,.� DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments F. Local Streets and Roads compliance wi h Hinimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL CCt1PLY.,.._— DOES NOT CO"P'LY Date Commments S. Fire protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES.,,,,,,,,,• WILL C(XP1Y DOES NOT COTSPLY �- Date Comments M. Police Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments i. LMAI Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) Lane ;cation Required/Acres Provided Cash 1n Lieu of Lind .r. Gross Acres PUx. x 5. /AC « S �--�— J. .�ch^c3 Compliance with the Standards of the froward County School Board: SCHOOL SITLS NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL W�l NEED w « • • MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED ` ` « ` HISH SCHDDL NOT NEEDED Letter from School Board Dated -- Pipe 4 VVELpprENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET VIII. POCESSIH-0 FEES (PAID): Site Plan Review: 650.00 'Revised Site Plan: s - Plat Review: s Somatic Ens.: 75n- other: s STAFF E,MENTS: Proposed development islisgwt in general conforMance With Tamarac's lend Use Plan Element and reco mends: Adoption of Devclor"fit order d 038-1 Master File d iraL. For: PHI f Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following conditions: • Staff recommends Council approval of the Final Site Plan and Landscape Plan. i C�