HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-84-0732
2
3
7
8
9
10
.22
.23
14
25
26
1�
20
24
25
26
27
'9
7
32
34
35
36
Introduced by C
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-84--,
Temp. Reso. #3049'
A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER
NO. 045-1 FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN FOR SPRINGLAKE
II; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council
of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accord-
ance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting
regarding the review of the application for a revised development
order by the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the
application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations; and the
attached Development Review Status Sheet dated 3/9/84; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development
order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the applica-
tion is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan,
or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for the development that is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a revised
site plan for Springlake II, revised January 10, 1984, to reflect
revised minimum setbacks in the rear of Block 8 and Lots 1 through 5
of Block 2, is approved subject to the following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the
plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of
Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review Status
Sheet and approved engineering drawings.
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than onE
year from the date of this approval. If the development does not
commence construction within one year, this approval is null and void
unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable
regulations.
2
2
3
4
i
15
e
9
20
.22
13
24
25
26
20
= I
22
23
24
25
26
27
32
33
34
35
36
Temp. Reso. #3049
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an
assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance
with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the
original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the revised development order are set forth as follows:
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised
development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to
be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of
the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned
shall become effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this /�day of �v 1984.
ATTEST:
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CER IFY that I have
approved th form and correctness
of�is Res lution.
A
RAWKWUM
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR FALCK:iei
DIST. 1: C/M KRAVITZ:of
DIST. 2: V/M MASSARO:
DIST. 3: C/M STELZER:
DIST. 4: C/M KRANTZ:�
x 1,31r
5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE 0 TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722.5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMO #
DATE 3/9/84
Orig. Dev. Order
04�i Revised Dev. Order
rDeveloper
PRING LAKE II REVISED_ SITE PLAN FOR Master File # 25-79
IN. SETBACKS IN REAR OF BLOCK 8 and LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 2
te.-nf NW 7J__.�t-__west of _Uesiwund-nr�_ _- ---- ---- -- - HLR, INC.
SPRING LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
Zoning R-3 Acres 9.4 Recommended Date for Council Action 3/9/84
Future Land Use Designation _ Proposed Use _
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES:
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Su 4ldino Official
Fire Chief
Finance Director
Final Plat __ Revised Site Plan
Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan
LII. PLANNING CO;I!IISSIOrl RFCO,i;9ENDATIONS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date 3/7/84 DENIAL/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated Rev 1/10/84
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
See Page 4 of this report
III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRA;•tINGS:
APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date DENIAL/Date
Comments
cont'd
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET '
�JVO�LANZSCAPE PLAN:
Staff Action APPROVAL APPROV L WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL
Date
Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date:
APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH COWDITIONS DENIAL
V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CPM111177EE REPORT:
If applicable
-Comments
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY/
A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney :Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount S
5% Required/Acres __ Provided
Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount S
Project Acreage X $130/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges
Number of ERCs X $1500
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs
G. Local Parks/Recreation
Acres Required Provided
Fee Amount q
Fee Amount $
Fee Amount q
$/Acre X Deficiency/Acres
Engineering Fees Fee Amount $
Bonds Bond Amount $
Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
Date
cont'd
Page 3 Memo #
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
A. Potable 1�ater Service
Certification of C' y Engineer or Consultinv City Engineer of
Availability of S rvice:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B. Wastewater Treatment .and Disposal Service
Certification of C' y Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of rvice:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE _ NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
C. Solid Waste Disp al Service
Determination o Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
D. Drainage AdequV*agle:
Certification y Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of,Dr
ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAATE
Date Comments
E. Regional Transpo ation Network
Compliance wit Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F. Local Streets/andoads
Compliance wiimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COr-1PLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
G. Fire Protection Se ice
Compliance wit nimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
H. Police Protection S ice
Compliance with Mi imum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Local_ Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities)
Land Deaication Required/Acres Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $
J. School Sites
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
" MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
" HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated — —
A.
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: $
175.00
Revised Site Plan: $
Plat Review: $
Schematic Eng.: $
Other: $
STAFF C"ENTS:
Proposed development isli in general conformance with Tamarac's Land
Use Plan Element and recommends:
Adoption of Development Order 045-1 Master File 25_7g For:
SPRING LAKE II REVISED SITE PLAN FOR REVISED P11N, SETBACKS IN REAR OF Rinr.K 8 and
LOTS 1 - 5, BLOCK 2
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions: -.
Staff recommends approval of the revised site plan, subject to the
rear setbacks on lots 1-5,-Block 2 being no less than 20', since these
are double frontage lots.