Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-84-0732 2 3 7 8 9 10 .22 .23 14 25 26 1� 20 24 25 26 27 '9 7 32 34 35 36 Introduced by C CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. R-84--, Temp. Reso. #3049' A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 045-1 FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN FOR SPRINGLAKE II; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accord- ance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the application for a revised development order by the applicant for development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations; and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated 3/9/84; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the applica- tion is in compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the subject of the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a revised site plan for Springlake II, revised January 10, 1984, to reflect revised minimum setbacks in the rear of Block 8 and Lots 1 through 5 of Block 2, is approved subject to the following conditions: A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than onE year from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. 2 2 3 4 i 15 e 9 20 .22 13 24 25 26 20 = I 22 23 24 25 26 27 32 33 34 35 36 Temp. Reso. #3049 C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised development order are set forth as follows: SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned shall become effective immediately upon its passage. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this /�day of �v 1984. ATTEST: ASSISTANT CITY CLERK I HEREBY CER IFY that I have approved th form and correctness of�is Res lution. A RAWKWUM RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE MAYOR FALCK:iei DIST. 1: C/M KRAVITZ:of DIST. 2: V/M MASSARO: DIST. 3: C/M STELZER: DIST. 4: C/M KRANTZ:� x 1,31r 5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE 0 TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321 TELEPHONE (305) 722.5900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET MEMO # DATE 3/9/84 Orig. Dev. Order 04�i Revised Dev. Order rDeveloper PRING LAKE II REVISED_ SITE PLAN FOR Master File # 25-79 IN. SETBACKS IN REAR OF BLOCK 8 and LOTS 1-5, BLOCK 2 te.-nf NW 7J__.�t-__west of _Uesiwund-nr�_ _- ---- ---- -- - HLR, INC. SPRING LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Zoning R-3 Acres 9.4 Recommended Date for Council Action 3/9/84 Future Land Use Designation _ Proposed Use _ DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: Final Site Plan I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: City Planner City Engineer Chief Su 4ldino Official Fire Chief Finance Director Final Plat __ Revised Site Plan Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan LII. PLANNING CO;I!IISSIOrl RFCO,i;9ENDATIONS: APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date 3/7/84 DENIAL/Date Final Site Plan dated Rev Final Plat dated Rev Revised Site Plan dated Rev 1/10/84 Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan: See Page 4 of this report III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRA;•tINGS: APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date DENIAL/Date Comments cont'd Page 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET ' �JVO�LANZSCAPE PLAN: Staff Action APPROVAL APPROV L WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL Date Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH COWDITIONS DENIAL V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CPM111177EE REPORT: If applicable -Comments VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY/ A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement City Engineer Approval/Date City Attorney :Approval/Date B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount S 5% Required/Acres __ Provided Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount S Project Acreage X $130/Acre E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Number of ERCs X $1500 F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs G. Local Parks/Recreation Acres Required Provided Fee Amount q Fee Amount $ Fee Amount q $/Acre X Deficiency/Acres Engineering Fees Fee Amount $ Bonds Bond Amount $ Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney J. On Site Beautification (Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance) Date cont'd Page 3 Memo # DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: A. Potable 1�ater Service Certification of C' y Engineer or Consultinv City Engineer of Availability of S rvice: AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments B. Wastewater Treatment .and Disposal Service Certification of C' y Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of rvice: AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE _ NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments C. Solid Waste Disp al Service Determination o Availability of Service: AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments D. Drainage AdequV*agle: Certification y Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of,Dr ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAATE Date Comments E. Regional Transpo ation Network Compliance wit Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments F. Local Streets/andoads Compliance wiimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COr-1PLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments G. Fire Protection Se ice Compliance wit nimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments H. Police Protection S ice Compliance with Mi imum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments I. Local_ Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) Land Deaication Required/Acres Provided Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $ J. School Sites Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED " MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED " HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED Letter from School Board Dated — — A. Page 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID): Site Plan Review: $ 175.00 Revised Site Plan: $ Plat Review: $ Schematic Eng.: $ Other: $ STAFF C"ENTS: Proposed development isli in general conformance with Tamarac's Land Use Plan Element and recommends: Adoption of Development Order 045-1 Master File 25_7g For: SPRING LAKE II REVISED SITE PLAN FOR REVISED P11N, SETBACKS IN REAR OF Rinr.K 8 and LOTS 1 - 5, BLOCK 2 Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following conditions: -. Staff recommends approval of the revised site plan, subject to the rear setbacks on lots 1-5,-Block 2 being no less than 20', since these are double frontage lots.