HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-84-062Introduced by V/M Massaro Temp.Reso. # 2941
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
a
ll
22
23
24
25
26
U:1
29
30
i,
33
34
35
36
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-84- 62
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR
BISHOP TRACT 26
PROJECT. DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO.070 ;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City
Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting
has been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the
date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of
the application for a development order by the applicant for
development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated
the,application, staff and Planning Commission recommend-
ations, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet
dated 11/18/83 ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Development Order
and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the appli-
cation is in compliance with all elements of its Compre-
hensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development
that is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the development described on the
attached Development Review Status Sheet dated 11/18/83
is granted a Development Order to proceed subject to the
following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with
the plans and specifications submitted by the developer to
the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the
Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering
drawings.
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
I
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
8
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
2
33
34
35
36
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than
one year from the date of this approval. If the development
does not commence construction within one year, this approval
is null and void unless an extension has been granted in
accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The Development Order is assignable, but an assign-
ment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance
with the Order unless the City Council consents to modify any
of the original requirements.
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue
the development order are set forth as follows:
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this
Development Order be declared by a court of competent juris-
diction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if
the other portions of the Order remain valid or whether the
approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 3: This Development Order as conditioned shall
become effective immediately upon adoption.
PASSED,ADOPTED AND APPROVED this ist day of March , 1984.
ATTEST: p A
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CFTIFY that I have
approved tform and correctness
of this Relution.
EY
MAYbR
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR FALCK:
DIST. 1: C/M KRA ITZ:
DIST. 2: V/ W"SSARO:
DIST. 3: C/I{=4 STELZER:
DIST. 4: C/M KRANTZ: �.1
A
5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE 0 TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMO #
DATE 1 l,/18/83
070 Orig. Dev. Order
Revised Dev. Order
Project BISHOP TRACT 26 _ Master File # 40-82
Location West side NW 88 Ave- south of Heftier Homes
DeveloperJUSTUS HOMES INC. OF FLORIDA
Owner JUSTUS HOMES INC. OF FLORIDA
Zoning R-3 Acres 17.55 Recommended Date for Council Action 11/23/83
Future Land Use DesignationLow medium density Proposed Use 203 dwelling units
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan Final Plat _ Revised Site Plan
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Bu4ldina Official
Fire Chief
Finance Director
I I . PLANNING COMMISSION RECOi is 1ENDATIONS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date 7/6/83 DENIAL/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated Rev
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
See Page 4 of this report
III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS:
APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date DENIAL/Date
Comments
ff
cont'd
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
IV. LANDS":APE PLAN: N/A_ R Perimeter plat only
Staff Action APPROVAL _ APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL
Date
Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date:
APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL
V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT: Date
If applicable)
Comments
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY_
A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
Developer Agreement
C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount $
5% Required/Acres ___ Provided
Deficiency/Acres
X $35,000/Acre
D.
Drainage Improvement
Fee
Amount
q 2,246 40
Project Acreage
X $130/Acre
E.
Wateryltewer Contribution Charges Fee
Amount
4
Number of ERCs
X $1600
F.
ERC Review Fee, if more
than 10 ERCs Fee
Amount
$
G.
Local Parks/Recreation
Fee
Amount
S
Acres Required Provided
$/Acre X
Deficiency/Acres
H.
Engineering Fees
Fee
Amount
$
I.
Bonds
Bond
Amount
3
Date: Approved by City
Engineer City
Attorney
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
cont 'd
Page 3 Memo #
a DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE _ NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
D. Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of Drainage:
ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAUTE
Date Comments
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
G. Fire Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
H. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities)
and Dedication Required/Acres Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $
J. School Sites
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
" of
MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
" to
of " HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated — _
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: $
Revised Site Plan: $
Plat Review: $ 391.48
Schematic Eng.:
Other: $
STAFF COMMENTS:
Proposed development islis=*m*--in general conformance with Tamarac's Land
Use Plan Element and recommends:
Adoption of Development Order 070 Master File # 40-82 For:
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions: -
The developer has agreed to indicate on the plat that a minimum of
5% of land area shall be provided for water retention. A minimum
of 5% water retention shall be included on the subsequent site plan
Council to determine the acceptability of the applicant's proposed
agreement.
9