HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-84-3342
2
3
4
8
9
i2
13
14
15
8
9
20
2
24
25
26
29
331
341
3151
36
Introduced by (/ In Temp. #3344
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-=?�
A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER
NO. 087-2 FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN FOR THE CONCORD
VILLAGE II PROJECT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of Tamarac,
Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable law of
the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the application for
a revised development order by the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application,
staff and Planning Commission recommendations; and the attached Development Review
Status Sheet dated 10/19/84; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development order and
accompanying docents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in
compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is
the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF TIC CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a revised site plan for
Concord Village II, revised October 17, 1984, to reflect the following changes:
(1) Waiver of the 20-foot berm along NW 88th Avenue; and (2) Reducing three
buildings from three stories to one story on the south side of NW 61st Street,
is approved subject to the following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and
specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in
Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings.
B. Comiencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from
June 17, 1984. If the development does not commence construction within one year,
this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance
with applicable regulations.
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does
not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City
Council consents to modify any of the original requirements.
i
1
2
3
4
8
9
f3
9
20
23
24
25
26
�tw
1
33
34
Temp. #3344
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised
development order are set forth as follows:
1 - All previous requirements by Council must be included on site plan.
2 - Council to consider granting waiver to allow 15' berm and 3' wall on
NW 88 Avenue, in lieu of the required 20' berm.
3 - Provide "Right Turn Only" signs on NW 88 Avenue.
4 - Provide easement for sidewalk along NW 84 Terrace prior to issuance
of building permit.
5 - By typical note, indicate that all driveways have 47' turning radius.
6 - Dumpsters to comply with code.
7 - Prior to building permit issuance, applicant should submit a revised
landscape plan to the Beautification Committee for approval.
8 - The transfer of Water/Sewer Agreement with a new graphic sketch of
reduced site plan attached shall be provided prior to issuance of any-
building permits.
9 - Developer has agreed to post with the City a Letter of Credit in the
amount of $25,000.00 for two or three years time for a traffic light
at NW 61 Street if the County approves and it is deemed necessary.
10 - Developer has agreed to pay an additional $15,000.00 for Parks and
Recreation fees before building permits are issued.
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised development
order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City
Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether
the approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned shall become
effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this �I` day of , 1984.
ATTEST: MA
sISTANT CITY CLERK RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved
MAYOR:
KRAVITZ
DISTRICT4:
V/M STEIN
DISTRICT3:
C/M STELZER
DISTRICT2:
C/M MUNITZ
DISTRICTI:
C/M BERNSTEIN
I
1
1
`tReso. #84-334 it
5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE 1305) 722-590D
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMO # %
DATE 1— 0/19/84
Orig. Dev. Order
087-2 evised Dev. Order
Project CONCORD VILLAGE II REVISED SITE PLAN Master File # 10-78
for change from Adult Condo to Rental/Open Community (Max. 24 units allowing)
Location NW 61 St between NW 88 Ave and NW 84 Terr. _ ._Jqc i]dren
Developer- Dinerstein Builders. Inc.
Owner —Shell Oil Company
Zoning,., R-4A Acres 20 Recommended Date for Council Action 1. 0/24/84
Future Land Use Designation Medium Density Res. Proposed Use 291 apts _
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan
I. STAFF APPROVAL D.47FS:
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Eu~ldina Official
Fire :iiief
Finance Director
Final Plat Revised Site Plan X
Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan,
II. PLANNINO' CO''?ISSIO'N RF7O;i;1ENDA710NS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date 10/3/84 DE"'.I;L/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated _ Rev 9/27/84
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
See Page 4 of this report
I1I. FINAL ENGINEERING DR411 NOS:
APPROVAL/Date APPRDVAL AS REDLINED/Date DENIAL/Date
Comments
cont'd
Page 2 r. ,
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN: *SEE 7LANN7ERRE�COMME7DATITNON PAGE70F THIS7EPO�RT
Staff Action APPROVAL ` APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS _ DENIAL
Date
Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date:
APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL
V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CPMMITTEE REPORT: Date
If applicable)
-Comments
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY
A. Water and Serer Developer Agreement Transfer *****
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney:Approval/Date
B. Other Developmert Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
****** Transfer of W/S Agreement with new graphic sketch of reduced site plan
attached to agreement - said agreement to be provided prior to the
issuance of building permits
C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount S N
5°: Required/Acres _. Provided
Deficiency/Acres X S35,000/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount S
Project Acreage X S130/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution, Charges Fee Amount c
.Number of ERCs X $1500
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount S
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount S
Acres Required.,_ Provided
S/Acre
X Deficiency/Acres
H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount S
1. Bonds Bond Amount S
Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
Ll
1
1
cont'd
Reso #84-334
Page 3
Memo #
1
ncvcl npmrNT RrVirw IMTIK CNFFT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
A. Pota b 1 e 10 ter Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE __. NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE _ NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE __ WILL BE AVAILABLE _ NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
D. Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of.Drainage:
ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAUTE
Date Comments
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES _�_ WILL COMPLY _ DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIESWILL COt.1PLY_ DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
G. Fire Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES �)r--_ WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY --_
Date Comments
H. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Local_ Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities)
Land DeO cation Required/Acres Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land,_ Gross Acres Max. X /AC $_--
J. School Sites /
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
It of
" " MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
is
of
of
" HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated ._
1
1
1
Page 4
11
1
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: s
Revised Site Plan: s 175.00
Plat Review: S
Schematic Eng.: $
Other: $
STAFF COMMENTS:
Proposed development is/isin general conformance with Tamarac's Land
Use Plan Element and recommends:
Adoption of Development Order # 08_== raster File # 10-78 For:
^
al
Adult Condo to Rent n CTTF PI AN for rhanna from
cnNcnRn �►Ti i nrF ;; nEVISE
Open Community (Maximum 24 units allowing children) —
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions: -
If Council grants approval of this site plan, it should be conditioned
upon the following:
1. All conditions of approval of extension of Concord Village II
final site plan. (see below **)
2. The transfer of Water/Sewer Agreement with a new graphic sketch
of reduced site plan attached shall be provided prior to issuance
of any building permits.
** CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION OF TIME ON CONCORD VILLAGE II
FINAL SITE PLAN
1
1
1