HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-84-3311
2
3
4
5
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
a
0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
1,2
33
34
35
36
Introduced by a/& Temp. #3360
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-84-3 3
A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER
NO. 091-2 FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN FOR TAMARAC
MARKET PLACE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of Tamarac,
Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable law
of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the application
for a revised development order by the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application,
staff and Planning Commission recommendations; and the attached Development Review
Status Sheet dated 10/18/84; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development order and
accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in
compliance with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is
the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a revised site plan for
Tamarac Market Place, prepared by Randall F. Keller, AIA, revised September 20,
1984, to reflect addition of Chicken Unlimited and relocation of a ground sign,
from the northeast corner of the plaza to the central entrance drive, is approved
subject to the followina conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and
specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in
Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings.
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from the
date of this approval. If the development does not commence construction within
one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in
accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does
not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City
Council consents to modify any of the original requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
a
No
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
33
34
35
36
Temp. #3360
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised
development order are set forth as follows:
1 - Handicap parking spaces to be in conformance with South Florida
Building Code.
2 - No call box (order station) permitted.
3 - All prior comments pertaining to this development still being valid.
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of the revised development
order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City
Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or
whether the approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned shall become
effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this �� day of , 1984•
ATTEST:
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved
the form and correctness of this
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR:
KRAVITZ
DISTRICT4:
V/M STEIN Gt-L
DISTRICT3:
C/M STELZER
DISTRICT2:
C/M MUNITZ
DISTRICTI:
C/M BERNSTEIN
1
33�
5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE 0 TAMARAC. FLORIDA 33321
TELEPHONE 1305) 722.5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
DATE 10/18/84
Orig. Dev. Order
REVISED SITE PLAN FOR 091--T Revised Dev. Order
Project TAMARAC MARKET_PLACELCHICKEN UNLIMITED Master File # 13-80
Location SW corner Nob Hill Rd and .MQ!kb Rd.
Developer Tamarac Market Place Land Trust
Owner Tamarac Market Place Land Trust
Zoning B-2,B-3 Acres 15.60 Recommended Date for Council Action 10 24 84
Future Land Use Designation Commercial Proposed Use Commercial
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES:
City Planner _
City Engineer
Chief E�;lding Official
Fire :;lief
Finance Director
Final Plat __-- Revised Site Plan X ._.
Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan
II. PLANNING CO,�"USSION RFCO.i;SENDATIONS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL V1I7H CONDITIONS/Date 10/3/84 DE"'.IAL/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated 9/19/84 Rev
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
See Page 4 of this report
1II. FINAL ENGltiEERIr4G DRA::'INGS:
APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date _ DE",'IAL/Pate
Comments
cont'd
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
mass*,.,
Ib. LANDSCAPE PLAN: 0
Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS _ DE►JIAL _
Date
eautification Committee Recommendation -Date:
V. BROWARD COL
If applica
•Comments
APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS _DENIAL
Y DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C M14ITTEE REPORT:
M
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY
A. Water and Serer Developer Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attorney:Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations,
C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount S
30/C' Required/Acres Provided
Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount S
Project Acreage X $130/Acre
E. Water Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount g
Number of ERCs X $1500
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount $
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount g
H.
I.
Acres Required _ Provided
$/Acre
X Deficiency/Acres i
Engineering Fees Fee Amount $
Bonds Bond lbnount S
Date: Approved by City Engineer _ City Attorney
Date
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
1
1
cont'd
X)- SV- 331
Page 3 Memo #
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE -Y WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE � WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
C.
Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE _, _ WILL BE AVAILABLE _.—
NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
,
D.
Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting
City Engineer of
Adequacy of Drainage:
ADEQUATE _ iy WILL BE ADEQUATE _—
NOT ADEQUUTE
Date Comments
E.
Regional Transportation Network
Standards:
Compliance with Minimum
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F.
Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY_._____
DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
G.
Fire Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES ___.�� WILL COMPLY ___
DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
H.
Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES -Z WILL COMPLY
DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I.
Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities)
and Ue0cation Required/Acres -
Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $_.___ /AC $
J. School Ste►' f�
Compliance
nce with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
to " " to MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
to " HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated _ —
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: S
Revised Site Plan: S 400.00
Plat Review: $
Schematic Eng.: $
Other: $
STAFF COMMENTS:
Proposed development is/ice in general conformance with Tamarac's Land
Use Plan Element and recommends:
Adoption of Development Order f 09_ 1_ 2 Master File d 13-80 For:
i�i�rrvrni li�il TMTTCfI
REVISFp SITE PN N Fng TQP"9p A,, r,Apk FT pi I!1 F/ CH T C KFN II -
Pr ject subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions: -.
This site plan also reflects
therelocation
elocatiothe centraheeground sign from
the northeast corner of the plaza
e.
Staff recommends approval, subject to the following:
1. Handicap parking spaces to be in conformance with South Florida
Building Code.
2. No call box (order station) permitted.
3. All prior comments pertaining to this development still being valid.
I�