HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-84-2671
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
NJ
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
[l
Introduced by�Z/qTemp. Reso. # 3255
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO.JL-I-L-X�lp
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE
MIDWAY PLAZA
PROJECT. DEVELOPM= ORDER: NO. 12 3 AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of the City of
Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable
law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the applica-
tion -for a developent order by the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application,
staff and Planning Commission recommendations, and the attached Development Review
Status Sheet dated 7 / 2 0 / 8 4 ; and
L�,AS, the City Council reviewed the development order and accompanying
documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in com-
pliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior
to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development that
is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUPICIL OF THE' CITY OF TAMARAC,
maid ftoo 7sF
SECTION 1: That the development described on the attached development review
status sheet dated 7/ 20 / 84 is granted a development order to proceed subject to
the following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and spec-
ifications suhni.tted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in
Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings.
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year frcm. the
date of this approval. If the development does not cnce construction within
one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in
accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The development order is assignable, but an assignment does not
33 discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council
34 consents to modify any of the original requirements.
35
36
Temp. Reso. # 3 2 5 5
1 D. ,Additional conditions established in order to issue the development
2 order are set forth as follows:
3
4 A)0
5
5
7
8
9
10
11 SECTION 2• Should any section or provision of this development order be
i., declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall
13 detew*n ne if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval
14 shall be null and void.
15 SECTICN 3: This develognent order as conditioned shall become effective
16 invediately upon passage.
17 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this day of 1984.
l$
20
21 ATTEST:
2„
SISTANT CITY CLEM
22
I HEREBY CERTIFY Ithat I have
24 approved the f?5f and correct-
nes Jthe lution.
ar
.2L
22
28
29
30
1
3 ;-
-�3
34
1
MAYOR
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
MAYOR:
KRAVITZ
DISTRICT 4:
V/M STEIN
DISTRICT 3:
C/M STELZER moo_
IV
DISTRICT 2:
C/M MUNITZ
DISTRICT 1: C/M DUNNE,�_
1
5811 NORTHWEST BSTH AVENUE w TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321!
TELEPHONE (305) 722.5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET - - --
DATE 7/20/8
_2�. Orig. Dev. Order
Revised Dev. Order
Project MIDWAY PLAZA !_ Master File # 11-84
Location Northwest corner University_ Dr and NW 57 St.—_
Developer N
Owner STQNFy LEFcaUgT/ wAggEN JA�iE5 OROWITZ
Zoning B-2 Acres 22+ acres Recommended Date for Council Action 7/25/84
Future Land Use Designation Commercial Proposed Use Shopping center
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan Final Plat f X_.,,,' Revised Site Plan _._.
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Eu4ldina Official
Fire :;lief
Finance Director
II. PL+�'J'Jlt;u CO'�"1ISSIOtJ RF':'1:i:;ENDATIONS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL W7H CONDITIONS/Date 7/5/84 DE"IIAL/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev
Final Plat dated May 1984 Rev
Revised Site Plan dated _ Rev
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
See Page 4 of this report
III. FINAL EyGINEERING DRA:'INGS: .
APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date DE''JIAL/Date
Comments
cont'd
Page 2 r
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN:
Staff Action APPROVAL �— APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL
—�_
Date
Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date:
APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL
V. BROWARD rniimiY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT: Date __6/2 /84
If applicab e
• Comments
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): S U M M A R Y
A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date
City Attornex:Approval/Date_
B. Other Development A reemert (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
Water Retention Agreement
Development Review Agreement
C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount S 38,637.07
594' Required/Acres _J.� Provided `0-
Deficiency/Acres 1.1 _ X $35,000/Acre
D. Draina a Improvement Fee Amount $ 2,970.50
Project Acreage 22.85 ac.X $13p/Acre
E. Water Sewer Ccntrib i Charges Fee Amount q
!Number of ERCs X $1500
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCS Fee Amount $
G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount S
Acres Required Provided
$/Acre X Deficiency/Acres
H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount S
I. Bonds Bond Amount S
Date: Approved by City Engineer.___ City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
1
1
cont'd
Page 3
Memo #
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS 5
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RE UIREYENTS:
A. Potable k'a ter Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE ^ '-� WILL BE AVAILABLE �..
Date Comments
City Engineer of
NOT AVAILABLE
B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City £ngincer I)f
Availability of S vice:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLENOT AVAILABLE
DateComments
D. Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of,Drainage;
ADEQUATE �...� WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAUTE
Date Comments
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with inimum Standards:
COMPLIES �� WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance wi .linimum Standards:
COMPLIES ._�,.� WILL COr1PLY _ DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
G. Fire Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES _ WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COf1PLY
Date Comments
H. Police Protection Service
Compliance rlit Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities)
and flecication Required/Acres . Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land _.Gross Acres Max. X S.-/AC e S
J. Slcbnol
��
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:A' "
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL � NOT HEEDED
••" " NOT NEEDED
MInnt_E SCHOOL
'� of HIGH SCHOOL �- NOT NEEDED
letter from School Board Dated .�
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW -STATUS SHEET
VIII. PRDCESSING FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: $
Revised Site Plan: $
Plat Review: $
schematic Eng • = $ -
Other: S
STAFF CENTS:
Proposed development isl in general conformance with Tamarac's Lend
Use Plan Element and recomm nds:
Adoption of Development Order 1�2„3 Mister File f _ 1i-R4 For:
MIDWAY PIA7A
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions: - applicable ordinances and is
The final -plat is in conformance with all following
recommended for approval, subject toothAgreementnandconsiderations:
sDevelopment
1. Council to approve
Review Agreement
2. It is suggested that the developer provide bond to the City for
the eight foot bikeway along University Dr.
3. It is also recommended
ut7lizethe
thedeveloper
impactrfeesdfo�uthiseproject
into an agreement to
to pay a portion of the design of University Drive widening.
IV