The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-84-2391 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17' ..J 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 33 34 35 36 Introduced by /�'l .t _ _ Temp. Reno.#{ 3251 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. j�-- ff a7 3 A RESOLUTION ISSUING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE TAMARAC PARK SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT. DEVELOPM�' ORDER NO. 114 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WWHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the applica- tion -for a developpment order by the applicant for development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and Planning Commission reconm�.ndations, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated 7 / 19 / 8 4 ; and 1,EMRFRAS, the City Council reviewed the development order and acccinpanying documents at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in ccm-- pliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development that is the subject of the application. �• r NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TFIE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAIWZAC, SECTION 1: That the development described on the attached development review status sheet dated 7 19 84 is granted a development order to proceed subject to the following conditions: A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and spec- ifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. C. The development order is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. Temp. Reso. # 3 2 51 1 D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the development 2 order are set forth as follows: 3 1 - The name "Tamarac Park Shopping Center" is for identifica- 4 tion only and will not remain the name of the project. 5 2 - Provisions are to be made for openings in the walls to be erected on the north and west sides. 7 8 9 10 11 SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this development order be 12 declared by a court of canpetent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall 13 determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval 14 shall be null and void. 15 SECTION 3: This development order as conditioned shall become effective 16 immediately upon passage. 17 PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 2 5 th day of� July ^, 1984. 20 21 22 23 24 ;r .2 L 22 28 29 30 1 31 a3 34 35 36 I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved the form correct- ness � this Reso tion. W MAYOR RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE MAYOR: KRAVITZ DISTRICT 4: V/M STEIN ar- DISTRICT 3: C/Ay1 STELZER DISTRICT 2: C/M MUNITZ DISTRICT 1: C/M DUNNE L�] r 50 ' $811 NORTHWEST BBTH AVENUE * TAMARAC. FLORIDA 33321 TELEPHONE 1305) 722.590D DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET mEr1O # 114 DATE 7/19/84 Orig, DJ. 0rder Revised Dev, Order ProjectTAmARAC- PARlS SJOPP-ING rFNTFP Master File # 67-76A Location W 44---c i rii . Un1vers i t�L _ELn.-scLuth.._a An _ arm C>.i x,_Euk Developer Owner , .,3$F{A1—p4AcrciPR.� Zoning .-R-1 _ Acres __1_4987 Recommended Date for Council Action 7/25/84 Future Land Use Designation Proposed Use Mopping Center DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: Final Site Plan , X� I. STAFF APPROVAL DAM: City Planner _ City Ennineer Chief Eu;ldina Official Fire ";fief Finance Director Final Plat __X_ Revised Site Plan -- Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan II. PLANNING CO;'IISSION REC0:i;1ENDA71ONS: 5 / 16 / 84 APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date 7/5/84 DEVIAL/Date APPROVAL or Final Site Plan dated. 11,421im Rev Final Plat dated Rev Revised Site Plan dated Rev Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan: See Page 4 of this report III. FINAL ENGINEERINS DRA;'INGS: APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS R1:DLIpED/ Date 7/13/84 DENIAL/mate Comments cont'd Page 2 r' DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET If IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Staff Action APPROVAL . APPROVAL WITH COIVDITIDNS_JL_ DENIAL Date 2122184 Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: 3/5/84 APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS _X_ DENIAL V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT: pate 11391$4_ (If applicable) -Comments VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY A. water and Serer Developer Agreement - City Engineer Approval/Date ,. _M a/84 City Attorney :Approval/Date B. Other Developmert A reement (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) Water Retention Agreement C. Drainane Retention Fee Amount 5 5.47015D 5n Required/Acres 15-63 acs Provided - Deficiency/Acres �15F; _.... X $35,000/Acre D. Drain_aSe Improvement Fee Amount S 406.38 Project Acreage 3.126 X $130/Acre E. Water b Sewer ContribW,tinn Charges Fee Amount S 7_650+,(? �.. Number of ERCs X $158 F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount $ G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount R N/A Acres Required Provided $/Acre X ------ Deficiency/Acres $8,789.79 Total H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount S 450.00 Prepaid 1•ance I. Bonds Bond Amount S $18,327.00 Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney J. On Site Beautification $529.08 (Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance) is cont'd • Page 3 Memo 0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RE UIREMENTS: A. Potable Water Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE ---,Y, — WILL BE AVAILABLE _, , NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments Service B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE ------ NOT AVAILABLE — Date Comments C. Solid Waste Disposal Service Determination Availability of Service: Xof AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE _ NOT AVAILABLE — Date Comments , D. Drainage Adequacy Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of,Drainage: ADEQUATE �.X WILL BE ADEQUATE — NOT ADEQAUTE Date Comments E. Regional Transportation Network Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments F. Local Streets and Roads Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments G. Fire Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: X COMPLIES WILL COMPLY ___� DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments H. Police Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N Land ication Required/Acres Provided Cash in Lieu of Land _Gross Acres Max. X $�/AC J. Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: N/A SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED of at It " MIDDLE SCHOOL_ NOT NEEDED It is It " HIGH SCHOOL ,.�_.. NOT NEEDED Letter from School Board Dated .� Page 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID): Site Plan Review: $ 600.00 Revised Site Plan: $ Plat Review: $ 270.00 Schematic Eng.: 450.00 Other: STAFF COMMENTS: Proposed development is/isqmff-in general conformance with TamaraG's Land Use Plan Element and recommends: Adoption of Development Order # 114 Master File 67-76A For: TAMARAC PARK SHOPPING CENTER FINAL PLAT AND FINAL SITE PLAN Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following conditions: Approval is conditioned upon the following: 1. Council approval of Water/Sewer Agreement 2. Council approval of Water Retention Agreement 3. Council approval of landscape plan 4. No building permits to be issued prior to recoraation of plat. 5. City Attorney to determine whether a stipulation may be made concerning permissibility of openings within the 6' high concrete wall on the north and west sides. (good planning would dictate providing visual openings in the wall for security ournoses,) 1 if