Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-84-148I 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 '4 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Introduced by Temp. # 3132 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. R-84-&e A RESOLUTION ISSUING REVISED DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 045-2, FOR A REVISED SITE PLAN FOR SPRINGLAKE II; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the application for a revised development order by the applicant for development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and.Planning Commission recommendations; and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated 4/27/84; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the revised development order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in compli- ance with all elements of. the Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the development that is the subject of the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a revised site plan for Springlake II, revised April 26, 1984, to reflect an increase of 1-foot outside the envelope for Lots 16 & 1.7 of Block 2, Lot 1 of Block 7, and Lot 9 of Block 8, is approved subject to the following conditions: A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and speci- fications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. C. The revised development order is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. Li 1 F� 1 2 3 4 5 6i 7 8 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Temp. # 3132 D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the revised (development order are set forth as follows: 'So .J SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this revised development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3: This revised development order as conditioned shall become effective immediately upon its passage. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this " day of 1984. MAY ATTEST: - ASSISTANT CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved the form and correctness of this RESOTJJTTON _ RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE MAYOR: KRAVITZ- DISTRICT 4: V/M STEIN DISTRICT 3: C/M STELZER DISTRICT 2: C/M MUNITZ� DISTRICT 1: C/M DUNNE 5811 NORTHWEST 69TH AVENUE TAMARAC. FLORIDA 333?1 TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900 nrvrinPmFNT REVIEW STATUS SHEET MEMO DATE_4/27/84 Orig. Dev. Order 045--- evised Dev. Order SPRING LAKE II REVISED SITE PLAN FOR Master File # 25-79 IYQRE�OS� FOOT OUTSIDE ENVELOPE ON CERTAIN LOTS Location ,West—Q—s -Westwood Dr._-_ s_outh fQ�N_W _77 St. Developer SPRING LAKE II HOMEOWNSOCIATION,INC. Owner SEEINQ LALE II HOMEOWNERSIATION. INC. Zoning R-3 Acres Recommended Date for Council Action Future Land Use Designation Low density_ Proposed Use single family villas DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan_-_ I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan City Planner - City Engineer Chief Eu' ldina Official Fire �hief Finance Director II. PLA1NING COMMISSION RFCO:I;IENDATIONS: APPROVAL or APPROVAL MTH CONDITIONS/Date _,V./Y�' DEMIAL/Date Final Site Plan dated Rev Final Plat dated Rev Revised Site Plan dated Rev t/ LA Planning Commission finding of compliance with"Certified Plan: See Page 4 of this report III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRA'VINGS: APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date DENIAL/Date Comments cont'd Page 2 ,. DEVELOPMENT ''REVIEW STATUS SHEET IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Staff Action APPROVAL L APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL Date Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COM1141TTEE REPORT: Date If app icab e -Comments I V]. DEVELOPERS AGREEt1ENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY A. Water and -Sewer-Developer _Agreement City Engineer Approval/Date City Attorney:Approval/Date B. Other Development Agreemen (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) C. Drainage Retention 5% Required/Acres Provided Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre D. Drainage Improvement Project Acreage X $130/Acre E. Water & Sewer Contribylj= Charges Number of ERCs X $1500 F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount S Fee Amount 5 Fee Amount S Fee Amount $ Fee Amount R Acres Required Provided $/Acre XDeficiency/Acres H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount S I. Bonds _ Bond Amount S Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney J. On Site Beautification (Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance) cont'd L A Page 3 Memo DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET DEVELOPMENT REVIEW RE UIREMENTS: A. Potable Water Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE L WILL BE AVAILABLE _,_-, NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of, Service: AVAILABLE V. WILL BE AVAILABLE _...� HOT AVAILABLE Date Comments C. Solid Waste Disposal Service Determination of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE.— WILL BE AVAILABLE.^ NOT AVAILABLE -- Date Comments D. Drainage Adequacy Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of :Draage: ADEQUATE .._.._�.�. WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAUTE Date Comments E. Regional Transp tation Network Compliance wit Minimum Standards: COMPLIES _ WILL COMPLY DOES NDT COMPLY Date Comments F. Local Streets and Roads Compliance wit linimum Standards: COMPLIES _ WILL CUIPLY — DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments G. Fire Protection Service Compliance with Fyinimum Standards: COMPLIES (.,�_ WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments --------------- H. Police Protection rvice Compliance with nimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) Lind ecication Required/Acres Provided ...�._.� Cash in Lieu of Lend _ .Gross Acres Max. X $� /AC $ �. Saul SZie Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED 41 of It to MIDDLE SCHOOL— NOT NEEDED to of " " HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED Letter from School Board Dated T Page 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID): Site plan Review: Revised Site Plan: Plat Review: Schematic Eng.: Other: STAFF COMMENTS: =ds: in general conformance with Tamarac's Lend Proposed development isl Use Plan Element and rec nt Order # 045-2 Master File # ��-�O For: Adoption of Development ,��� SPRING LAKE II REVISED S IF AN IS INCREASE UP r-7 FOR THE FOLLOWING LOTS: Lot 6 Blk 2; Lot 17 Blk2; Lot 1 Blk 7; Lot 9 Blk $ Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following conditions: Staff+ recommends approval of the request for increase of one foot outside envelopes for those lots requested -these were overlooked by the Association in their previous request for revisions. The increase will not conflict with the required rear setbacks on these specific lots.