Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-83-0561 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ,g ..J 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 F-7 L 33 34 35 36 Introduced by Vice Mayor Massaro Temp. Reso. # 2 641 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO.1C r,F3- A RESOLUTION ISSUING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE SUITRR CONSTRUCTION INC. CC141ERCIAL BUILDING PROJECT. DEVELOPMaw ORDER N. o. 053 AND PRWIDINiG KN EFFECTIVE DATE. M EREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the Ming regarding the review of the applica- tion -for a development order by the applicant for development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations, and the attached Development Review Status Sheet dated 2 / 9 / 8 3 ; and T�tEAS, the City Council reviewed the development order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and %11EREAS, the -City Council has determined that the application is in com- pliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development that is the subject of the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY 'EIE COUPICIL OF THE CITY OF TAN]ARAC, =WF's)101���� SECTION 1: That the development described on the attached development revieNA status sheet dated 2 / 9 / 83 is granted a development order to proceed subject to the following conditions: A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and spec- ifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. C. The development order is assignable, but an assignment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. Temp. Reso. # 2641 I D- .additional conditions established In order to issue the development order are set forth as follows: l - The wall is to be reduced from 4-feet to 3-feet high; 2 - The north end of the curbing to have a bigger return; 3 - The sodded area on public property must be Bahia grass. SECTYON 2: Should any section or provision of this development order be declared by a court of canpetent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECITOFI 3: This development order as conditioned shall became effective innediately upon passage. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 9th day -of March , 1983. ATTEST: ISTANT CITY CIFAK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved the fo and correct- ness of this olution. MAYORc CITV DISTRICT DISTRICT 71 DISTRICT DISTRICT 29 f 3;L -13 34 I 35 36 - \�'� S� MAYOR RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE 1 5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE • TAMARAC. FLORIDA 33321 TELEPHONE (305) 722.5900 - DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET MEMO # DATE 053 Orig. Dev. rder Revised Dev. Order Project __SIJTTF.R CQNSjRUCT.1.fK.., bMERt7&L BUILDING Master File 4 19-82 Fish Bowl Restaurant Location.wpst Side University n ord Village and Developer Owner I S Zoning. B_3 Acres 1,34 Recommended Dbte for Council Action 3 9/83 Future Land Use Designation Cpmmercial Proposed Use Office/Retail-.stores DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: Final Site Plan, Final PlatRevised Site Plan I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final S to PJav Final Plat Revised Site Plan City Planner City Engineer Chief Building Official Fire Chief I Finance Director II. PLANNING COiIIISSION RECO;T1ENDATIONS: APPROVAL or APPROVAL W17H CONDITIONS/Date 2/16/83 DENIAL/Date Final Site Plan dated Rev ,ZL9183__ Final Plat dated Rev Revised Site Plan dated Rev Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan: III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS: APPROVAL/DateAPPROVAL AS REDL14ED/Date 2/24/83 DENIAL/Date Comments See attached cont'd � r Page 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN: Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS- DENIAL Date 7/6/82 Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: 7 12 82 APPROVAL _ APPROVAL VITH CONDITIONS DENIAL V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW C(H4ITTEE REPORT: Date If applicable) Commerlts -Platted as CAUSEWAY TAMARAC PLAT (107/19) Developer to submit comments from B.C.Development Review Commit T'VELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES fWhert a placable : S U M M A R Y A. Water and Sewer Developer„.Agreement City Engineer Approval/Date City Attorney Approval/Date B. Other Development A9 reements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) 1)a 10' Utility Easement on north side of property b fire hydrant easement c) flow through easement 2)� Council to -approve off -site drainage easement C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount $ 5% Required/Acres 0.068 Provided - Deficiency/Acres 0.068 X $35,000/Acre D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount $ 1 .2'0 Project Acreage 1.34 X $130/Acre Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount $ 59062.50 Number of ERCs (Water) -^ $525•00 (Sewer) 2-1-, @ $975.00 F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs - Fee Amount $ N/A G. .Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount $ Acres Required .,., Provided $/Acre X� Deficiency/Acres H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount $ 5,501.72 I. Bonds Bond Amount $ 24,447.00 Date: Approved by City Engineer.___ City Attorney J. On Site Beautification - 606.15 '.,r„ (Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance) cont 'd Page 3 Memo # DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: A. Potable Water Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE „ A WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments C. Solid Waste Disposal Service Determination of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE ____X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE ' Date Comments D. Drainage Adequacy Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of,Drainage: ADEQUATE WILL BE ADEQUATE X NOT ADEQAATE Date Comments E. Regional Transportation Network Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY. -I DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments F. Local Streets and Roads Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments G. Fire Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments H. Police Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N/A and�i7tion Required/Acres Provided Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $ J. Ichoo] Sites Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED of " " " MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED " to " " HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED Letter from School Board Dated __ Page 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID): Site Plan Review: _ 600.00 resubmitted 2/2/83) $600.00 Revised Site Plan: ; Plat Review: 3 Schematic Eng.: $ 450.00 Other: $ STAFF COMMENTS: ­nsed development is/'it in general conformance with Tamarac's Land "Ian Element and recommends: Adoption of Development Order 053 Master File # 19-82 For: SUTTER CONSTRUCTION COMMERCIAL BUILDING Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following conditions: Developer has expressed a willingness to donate $10,000.00 for a traffic light at NW 61 St. and University Dr. 1. Council to approve on -site easements and keep in excrow until property is acquired. a) 10' Utility easement on north property line b) fire hydrant easement c) flow through easement 2. Council to approve off -site drainage easement ■\