The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-83-017Introduced b ) Y i r'I.,61 Temp. Reso. #2401 Revised 12/21/82 CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA Z RESOLUTION NO. R- 'wr 2 --.. 3 A RESOLUTION ISSUING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR A REVISED 4 SITE PLAN FOR SPRINGLAKE II - PHASE ONE PROJECT. DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 045; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council. of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with 9 applicable law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review 10 of the application for' a development order by the applicant for development u approval; and 22 WHEREAS, the City Council. has examined and investigated the application, 23 staff and Planning Commission recommendations; and 14 WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the development order and 15 accompanying documents at a public meeting; and 16 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined. that the application for Phase I is in compliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development that is the subject of the application. 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF TAMARAC, 21 FLORIDA: 22 SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a revised site plan 23 for Springlake TI - Phase One, prepared by Carnahan & Associates, revised July 19, 1982, to reflect project phasing, is approved subject to the following conditions: 26 A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans 27 and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as 28 described in Section TI of the Development Review Status Sheet dated "Revised 29 July 19 1982" for Phase I Sheet #2 and ap proved ppr.oved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year i from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence 32 construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an 33 extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. 34 -Ar, 36 1 (A 20 31 .22 23 16 33 16 20 21 22 23 26 25 26 27 2e jai 33 3< 33 36 Temp. Reno. 1 ,2401 C. The Development order is assignable, but an'asslgnment does not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the development order are set forth as follows: s 1. Wroval is only for Site plan I. This approval is not intended's or understood by city or developer to be an indication of any sort of concept plan approval, or the basis for any claim of vested rights_ Approval is granted with the understanding that a future or pending site plan for this project could conceivably be rejected by the City Muncil. r- 2. Phases 2, 3, and d are bnly shown for conceptual purposes and each phase requires site plan fees, council approval and Water and Sewer Developer Agreement. 3. Water and sewn agresssnt fnr Site plan I ant be wm,,t d. 4. All conditions that apply to the portion of the original site plan Identified as Phase I will apply to the approval of this revised site pl.. 5. All portions of the original site plan outside of plisse I are mill and void. 6. Beautification Pass we subject to figure revision. SECTION 2: Should anysection or provision of this development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3: This development order as:conditioned shall become effective immediately upon its passage. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this= l day of �. '� 1983, ATTEST: ASSISTANT CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved the form and correct- ness of this RESOLUTION. CITY ATTORNEY ti 1 "Y MAYOR RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE MAYOR: DISTRICT 1: DISTRICT 2: v. DISTRICT 3: '.";r DISTRICT fir• M-40 y 1 "Re5()S3-17 5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321 TELEPHONE 005) 722-5900 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET ,MEMO # DATE 9/30/82 045 Orig. Dev. Order Revised Dev. Order rDeveloper. SPRING LAKE II - PHASE"'ONE Master File # 25-79 TRACT 36 South side NW 77 St - west of Westwood Blvd West HLR, INC. HLR, INC.- Owner Zoning R-3 Acres 32.1 Recommended Date for Council Action 10/13/82 Future Land Use Designation Residential Proposed Use Residential - total unfts = 2 1� Ph. One = 57 DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: Final Site Plan I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: City Planner City Engineer Chief Building Official Fire Chief Finance Director Final Plat Revised Site Plan - 7/26/82 Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan I II. PLANNING COMMISSION RFCO;KIENDATIONS: APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date DENIAL/pate Final Site Plan dated Rev Final Plat dated Rev Revised Site Plan dated Rev Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan: III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS: APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date DENIAL/Date Comments cont'd Page 2 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN: N/A Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL Date Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS DENIAL V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT: N/A Date If app ica e Comments VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY A. Water and Sewer D velo er A reemen Not completed City Engineer Approval/Date City Attorney Approval/Date B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount $ N/A 5% Required/Acres Provided Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount $ _ N/A Project Acreage X $130/Acre E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Fee Amount $ 3832.00 Number of ERCs X $AAM/ $ 958.00 59.5 - 55.5 paid = 4 , 958 .00 = $3832.00 F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount $ NJA G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount $ N/A Acres Required Provided $/Acre — X Deficiency/Acres H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount $ N/A I. Bonds Bond Amount $ Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney J. On Site Beautification $2,103.47 Phase One (Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance) cont'd Page 3 Memo # . I 1 LLUPMLNI KLVILW SIAIUS 5HL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: A. Potable Water Service N/A Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE __W.__�.� WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments, B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments C. Solid Waste Disposal Service Determination of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE Date Comments D. Drainage Adequacy Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage: ADEQUATE I WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAUTE Date Comments E. Regional Transportation Network . Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments F. Local Streets and Roads Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments G. Fire Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments H. Police Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) Land Dedication Required/Acres Provided Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $ J. School _Site_ Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED "of at " MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED "of of" HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED Letter from School Board Dated rah+'.r+ Page 4 u DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID): Site Plan Review: $ Revised Site Plan: $ 400.00 Plat Review: $ Schematic Eng.: $ Other: $ STAFF COMMENTS: Proposed development .i,sjis not in general conformance with Tamarac's Land Use Plan Element and recommends: Adoption of Development Order W 045— Master File W ... 23-79 For: SPRING LAKE II -PHASE-ONE Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following conditions: 1. Approval is only for Phase I. 2. Phases 2, 3 and 4 are only shown for conceptual purposes and each phase requires site plan fees and council approval. 3. Water and sewer agreement for phase I must be signed, 4. Since building permits have already been issued, $2,103.47 landscape fee should be paid at Council meeting, 5. No building permit may be issued until Marmon receives their share of each ERC payment. r. THE HARLON GROUP SPRINGLAKE II (TRACT 36) PROJECT PHASES PHASE ONE - 57 Units + Clubhouse : 59� ERC's Block 1, Lots 34-42 Block 2, Lots 1--21 Block 7, Lots 1--10 Block 8, Lots 1-17 PHASE TWO - 60 Units + Clubhouse = 622 ERC's Block 1, Lots 1--33 Block 5, Lots 1- 23 Block 6, Lots 29-32 PHASE THREE - 62 Units = 62 ERC's Block 3, Lots 1-9 Block 4, Lots 16-30 Block 5, Lots 24-33 Block 6, Lots 1-28 PHASE FOUR - 42 Units = 42 ERC's Block 3, Lots 10-36 Block 4, Lots 1--15 JTB III 7-20--82 6701 North University Drive, Tamarac, Florida 33321 / (305) 722-1620