The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-82-0881 2 3 4 5 r., 8 9 10 11 1 13 14 15 16 17 is .-r 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 35 36 Introduced by Temp. # CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO. R-&�-ff A RESOLUTION ISSUING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE WOODMONT TRACTS 74 AND 75 PROJECT. DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 021 AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 2196 wTumm, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in accordance with applic- able law of the date, time and place of the meeting regarding the review of the application for a development order by the applicant for development approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the application, staff and Planning Commission recndations; and WEiEREAS, the City Council reviewed the development order and accompanying documents at a public meeting; and W MPEAS, the City Council has determined that the application is in corm pliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will be in ccupliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any unit on the development that is the subject of the application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA: SECTION 1: That the application for approval of a revised site plan for Woodmont Tracts 74 and 75 prepared by Keith and Schnars, P.A., revised February 24, 1982, for building and parking areas resulting from the inclusion of optional 3-bedroom units, is approved subject to the following conditions: A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans and spec- ifications�submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac as described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and approved engineering drawings. B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one year from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations. C. The development order is assignable, but an assignment does not dis- charge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements. 1 2 3 4 5 0A• 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 20 21 22 23 1O 27 28 29 30 35 36 Temp. # 2196 D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the development order are set forth following: 1. All original conditions of approval are still in effect that are not a part of this revision. 2. Developer may relocate islands in parking lots up to 20-feet in either direction to protect native trees provided the new location is in com- pliance with all other aspects of the City Code. If the islands are changed in any way, the developer must review the plan with the City Engineer as far as the effect it would have on drainage. 3. Three-foot asphalt walkway ramps shall be placed adjacent to all handicapped parking spaces. SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this development order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void. SECTION 3: This development order as conditioned shall becane effective immediately upon its final passage. /J PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this of��iZ1982. ATTEST: ASSISTANT CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved the form and correctness of this RESOLUTION. CITY ATTORNEY MAYOR: DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE EYH18I-1 *A" • �R-D ,7VS'! 5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE • TAMARAC. FLOR10A 33321' TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900 • -...%n..r l-r nrollru vrrnlC C14FFT MEMO # DATE 3/16/82 Orig. Dev. Order �_ evised Dev. Order Project W_ OODMONT TRACT 74_and 75_LONAIRE,Z_ Master File Location N_ W 78 St and NW 80 Ave..•• - Developer Rissman Development Corp Owner Rissman Development oro R-3 Zoning _ Acres 66.41 Recommended D6te for Council Action/ 4/g Future Land Use Designation M- Density Res. Proposed Use _ &d.. Density -Res- _ 66.41 acres with 840 units - Density =12.65 du/a DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR: NA Final Site Plan Final Plat NRevised Site Plan X I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final Site Plan Final Plat._,_.Revised Site Plan City Planner . 3/16/82 City Engineer _ 3/16/82 Chief Building Official —1/16/Q? Fire Chief 1/16/R2 Comments II. PLANNING COK1ISSION RFCOTIENDATIONS: APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CD*IDITIONS/Date 3/3/82 DENIAL/Date Final Site Plan dated 3/17/80 Rev _ 3/10/82 - Final Plat dated NA Rev Revised Site Plan dated _ _, Rev Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan: III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS: APPROVAL/Date NA APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date DENIAL/Date Comments conL W .I Page 2 r Revised Site Plan DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN: * NA Staff Action APPROVAL _ APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS _ DENIAL Date Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: * NA APPROVAL _ APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS —DENIAL V. ROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Ct.4]TTEE REPORT: * NA -Date (If applicable) Comments VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY A. Water and Sewer Developer Agreement City Engineer Approval/Date * NA City Attorney Approval/Date * NA B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.) -----C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount S 5% Required/Acres Provided Deficiency/Acres X $35,000/Acre * NA D. Drainage Improvement Fee Amount $ Project Acreage X $130/Acre E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges Pee Amount S * MA Number of ERCs X $1000 * NA F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs Fee Amount $ G. Local Parks/Recreation Fee Amount S * NA Acres Required _ Provided $/Acre X _ Deficiency/Acres * NA H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount S * NA I. Bonds Bond Amount $ Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney * NA cont 'd lei It Page 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STA HMO # DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: A.Potable Water Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE _____ _ NOT AVAILABLE _ Date Comments B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE _ NOT AVAILABLE _:._----- Date Comments C. Solid Waste Disposal Service Determination of Availability of Service: AVAILABLE x __ WILL BE AVAILABLE _ NOT AVAILABLE _ Date Comments D. —Drainage Adequacy Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of Adequacy of Drainage: ADEQUATE _X_ _ WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAATE Date Comments E. Regional Transportation Network Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES x WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments F. Local Streets and Roads Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES. X WILL COMPLY _ DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments G. IFire Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES_ X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments H. Police Protection Service Compliance with Minimum Standards: COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY Date Comments I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) an ear anon Required/Acres Provided *-Q- Cash in Lieu of Land _ Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $ * NA J. school Sites Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board: SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL *_-_ NOT HEEDED MIDDLE SCHOOL * NA _ NOT NEEDED « HIGH SCHOOL * NA y NOT NEEDED Letter from School Board Dated Page 4- 11 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID): Site Plan Review: $ Revised Site Plan: $ Plat Review: $ Schematic Eng.: $ Other: $ NA 400.00 _ STAFF COMMENTS: Proposed development is is not in general conformance with Tamarac's JLand Use Plan Element and recommends: Adoption of Development Order # 021 Master File # MO For: _gQvi sed site nl an for W_ao_dmont. Tractr?4..anj1..7.5._as.for• — Inclusion of 3 bedroom units with additional parking for_the -3 bedroom units. Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following conditions: 1. All original conditions of approval are still in effect that are not a part of this revision. 2. Developer may relocate islands in parking lots up to 20' in either direction to protect native trees provided the new location is in compliance with all other aspects of the City Code. 3. Three foot asphalt walkway ramps shall be placed adjacent to all handicapped parking spaces. L,