HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-82-326Introduced, by: V/'M Massaro Temp. Reso. #2509
1
2
3
4
8
9
20
,31
32
33
24
I
25
16
17
g
.L'4
2,0
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
29
29
33
34
33
36
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-82-&02&
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER
FOR THE SIEGAL FUNERAL HOME PROJECT.
DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 050 AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of t
City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in,
accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of theme
ing regarding the review of the application for a development order
the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, The City Council has examined and investigated the
application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations, and the
attached Development Review Status Sheet dated 10/21/82; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the development order and
accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application
is in compliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will
be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
for the development that is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the development described on the attached devel-
opment review status sheet dated 10/21/82 is granted a development
order to proceed subject to the following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans
and specifications submitted by the developer of the City of Tamarac
as described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and
approved engineering drawings.
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one yea
from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence
construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless
an extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulatio s.
C. The Development order is assignable, but an assignment does
not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unless
the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements.
2
2
3
4
7
81
!;
10
31
.22
33
14
23
26
77
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
i'll
32
33
34
35
36
Temp. Reso. #2509
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the
development order are set forth as follows:
1. The curbing on 70 Street and MdNab Road shall be backfilled and
sodded with Bahia grass for the length of this property;
2. There shall be landscaping around the northwest and north
allowing for the approximate locations of future doors con-
structed after the building plans are approved by the Build-
ing Department.
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this development
order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,
the City Council shall determine if the other portions of the order
remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void.
SECTION 3: This development order as conditioned shall become
effective immediately upon its passage.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this loth day of November ,1982.
ATTEST:
AS ISTANT CITY CLERK
MAYOR:
I HEREBY CERTIFY hat I have
approved the for and correct- DISTRICT
ness of this RE UTION. DISTRICT
�- DISTRICT
DISTRICT
CITYATPORNEY
Y
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
Sp. tia-sae'.
5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE 0 TAMARAC, FLORIDA , 33321
TELEPHONE (305) 722-5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMO #
DATE 10/21/82
050 Orig. Dev. Order
Revised Dev. Order
Project SIEGEL FUNERAL HOME Master File #
16-79
Location Lots 3 and 4, Block 34, MC NAB COMMERCIAL SUB. 2 (73-28)
Developer Dennis Siegel
Owner Dennis Siegel
Zoning = Acres 1.377 Recommended Date for Council Action 11/10/82
Future Land Use Designation rnmmprcial Proposed Use Funeral Home
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan = Final Plat Na Revised Site Plan
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final Site Plan Final Plat Revised Site Plan
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Building Official
Fire Chief
Finance Director
III. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOi1ENDATIONS:
■
■
■
APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS/Date 10/7/82 DENIAL/Date
Final Site Plan dated a/lA/R2 Rev 10/8/82
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated Rev
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
See Page 4 of this report
III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS:
APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date 8/27/82 DENIAL/Date
Comments See attached memo from City Engineer dated 8/27/82
cont'd
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
r
IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN:
Staff Action APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS X DENIAL
Date 9/18/82
Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: 9/13/82
APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS X DENIAL
V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVE
If applicable)
'MENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT:
Comments Afready platted - Lots 3 and 4, Block 34,
MC NAB COMMERCIAL SUB. #2 (73-28)
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS/FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY
A. Water and Sewer Develoaer Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date 8/27/82
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
Date
10 Foot Utility Easement
10 Foot Utility Easement
Right of Way Dedication on McNab Rd.
C. Drainage Retention Fee Amount $ 2,394.00
5% Required/Acres 1.377 Provided -n-
Deficiency/Acres .0684 X $35,000/Acre
D. Drainage Improvement
Project Acreage 1.377 X $130/Acre
E. Water & Sewer Contribution Charges
Number of ERCs 5 X $1000
F. ERC Review Fee, if more than 10 ERCs
G. Local Parks/Recreation
Fee Amount $=77_SL�._._
Fee Amount $ 7,50G.00
Fee Amount $ —N4A
Fee Amount $ N/A
Acres Required _ Provided
$/Acre X Deficiency/Acres
H. Engineering Fees Fee Amount 36.—
I. Bonds Bond Amount $ 31.576.OD
Date: Approved by City Engineer City Attorney
J. On Site Beautification 455-'n -
(Fees to be paid at time of building permit issuance)
cont'd
Page 3
Memo #
I
ULVLLUF'MtN1 KLVILW 51A
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
.AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE _._. NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
B. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE _X_ WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
D. Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of Drainage:
ADEQUATE X WILL BE ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAUTE
Date Comments
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards: �1
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY -'`,DOES! NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
G. Fire Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY ____X _ DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
H. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N/A
and Dedication Required/Acres Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $
J. ,School Sites N/A
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED N/A
" MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED N/A
N/A
" HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated —
rnn-+Ie
Page 4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
VIII. PROCESSING FEES (PAID):
Site Plan Review: $
Revised Site Plan: $
Plat Review: $
Schematic Eng.: $
Other: $
600.00 (paid 12/31/79
450.00 (paid 12/31/79)
STAFF COMMENTS:
Proposed development is/ice in general conformance with Tamarac's Land
Use Plan Element and recommends:
Adoption of Development Order # 05_ Master File # 16-79 For:
SIEGEL FUNERAL HOME
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions:
1. City Council acceptance of Water and Sewer Developers Agreement
2. City Council to accept Water Retention Agreement
3. City Council to approve for utility easements and rights -of -way
4. City Council to determine matter of parking requirements
* NOTE
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CITY'S CONSULTANT ENGINEERS ARE REVIEWING THE
RATE SCHEDULE AND, IF APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL PRIOR TO REVIEW OF
THIS PROJECT, REVISED WATER AND SEWER FEES COULD RESULT.
I
1