HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity of Tamarac Resolution R-82-2901
2
3
4
5
5
9
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
:18
3
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
33
34
35
36
Introduced by Temp. Reso. #2474
CITY OF TAMARAC, FLORIDA
RESOLUTION NO. R-82-�
A RESOLUTION ISSUING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER
FOR THE PICCADILLY CAFETERIAS, INC. PROJECT.
DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 052; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the instructions of the City Council of
the City of Tamarac, Florida, a public meeting has been advertised in
accordance with applicable law of the date, time and place of the meet-
ing -regarding the review of the application for a development order by
the applicant for development approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has examined and investigated the
application, staff and Planning Commission recommendations, and the
attached Development Review Status Sheet dated 10/7/82; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the development order and
accompanying documents at a public meeting; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the application
is in compliance with all elements of its Comprehensive Plan, or will
be in compliance prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
for the development that is the subject of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TAMARAC, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1: That the development described on the attached deve -
opment review status sheet dated 10/7/82 is granted a development orde
to proceed subject to the following conditions:
A. Construction is to be in complete compliance with the plans
and specifications submitted by the developer to the City of Tamarac
described in Section II of the Development Review Status Sheet and
approved engineering drawings.
B. Commencement of construction shall be no longer than one ye
from the date of this approval. If the development does not commence
construction within one year, this approval is null and void unless an
extension has been granted in accordance with applicable regulations.
C. The development order is assignable, but an assignment does
not discharge any assignee from strict compliance with the order unles
the City Council consents to modify any of the original requirements.
Temp. Reso. #2474
1
2
3
4
5
r
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
33
34
35
36
D. Additional conditions established in order to issue the
development order are set forth as follows:
All) AJI---
SECTION 2: Should any section or provision of this develop-
ment order be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, the City Council shall determine if the other portions of
the order remain valid or whether the approval shall be null and void
SECTION 3: This development order as conditioned shall become
effective immediately upon passage.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1982.
MA
ATTEST:
AS ISTANT CITY CLERK
MAYORt
DISTRICT
I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved
the form and correctness of this DISTRICT
RESOLUTION. // DISTRICT
CI
' -;4/ DISTRICT
!!
RECORD OF COUNCIL VOTE
PJ
1
V y 5811 NORTHWEST 88TH AVENUE TAMARAC, FLORIDA 33321
�:`�_ ...0• TELEPHONE 1305) 722-5900
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
MEMO #
DATE 10/7/82
052 Orig. Dev. Order
Revised Dev. Order
Project P_ rr.AnT11 v rAFFTFRTA Master File # 14-81
LorationFagt side UnivPrSity Dr-..hetwPan MrNah Plaza Nnrth and All Saints Lutheran CI
DeveloperRTrranTily rAFFTFRTA
Owner _P.TrrAnT! 1-.Y--('AFm;TFRTA- ___
Zoning B_2 Acres 7.661 Recommended Date for Council Action 10/13/82
Future Land Use Designation Commercial Proposed Use Restaurant
DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR:
Final Site Plan Final Plat X Revised Site Plan
72
I. STAFF APPROVAL DATES: Final Site Plar9120/82 Final Plat `Revised Site Plan
City Planner
City Engineer
Chief Building Official
Fire Chief
Finance Director
II. PLANNING COt4iISSION RECOi167ENDATIONS:
APPROVAL or APPROVAL WITH COMDITIONS/Date 9/15/82 DENIAL/Date
Final Site Plan dated Rev 9/9/82
Final Plat dated Rev
Revised Site Plan dated Rev
Planning Commission finding of compliance with Certified Plan:
See page 4 of this report
III. FINAL ENGINEERING DRAWINGS:
APPROVAL/Date APPROVAL AS REDLINED/Date _10/7/82 DENIAL/Date
Comments See attached letter.
cont'd
Page 2
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
IV. LANDSCAPE PLAN:
Staff -Action^ APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS x DENIAL
Date 9/8/82
Beautification Committee Recommendation -Date: 9/13/82
APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS _ x__DENIAL
V. BROWARD COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT:
If applicable)
Comments
VI. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENTS. FEES (Where applicable): SUMMARY'
A. Water and.Sewer Developer Agreement
City Engineer Approval/Date See page 4
City Attorney Approval/Date
B. Other Development Agreements (Covenants, Stipulations, etc.)
Water Retention Agreement
Date 2/18/82
C.
Drainage Retention
Fee'Amount
$
5,950.00
5% Required/Acres
Provided
Deficiency/Acres 0'17
X $35,000/Acre
D.
Drainage Improvement
Fee Amount
$
441.76
Project Acreage 3'4
X $130/Acre
E.
Water & Sewer Contribution
Charges Fee Amount
$
5,000.00
Number of ERCs 5
X $1000
F.
ERC Review Fee, if more
than 10 ERCs Fee Amount
$
N/A
G.
Local Parks/Recreation
Fee Amount
$
N/A
Acres Required _ Provided
$/Acre X
Deficiency/Acres
H.
Engineering Fees
Fee Amount
$
12,654.43
I.
Bonds
Bond Amount
$
Date: Approved by City
Engineer City Attorney
J.
On Site Beautification
2,303.11 '-
(Fees to be paid at time
of building permit issuance)
cont'd
P-�
Page 3
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STATUS SHEET
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
A. Potable Water Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE - NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
Memo #
B.- Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Service
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting,City Engineer of
Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE X WILL BE AVAILABLE NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
C. Solid Waste Disposal Service
Determination of Availability of Service:
AVAILABLE _ X WILL BE AVAILABLE - NOT AVAILABLE
Date Comments
D. Drainage Adequacy
Certification of City Engineer or Consulting City Engineer of
Adequacy of Drainage:
ADEQUATE X WILL BE.ADEQUATE NOT ADEQAUTE
Date Comments
E. Regional Transportation Network
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
=Date Comments
F. Local Streets and Roads
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
G. Fire Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date . Comments
H. Police Protection Service
Compliance with Minimum Standards:
COMPLIES X WILL COMPLY DOES NOT COMPLY
Date Comments
I. Local Parks (Parks and Recreation Facilities) N/A
an De icycation Required/Acres Provided
Cash in Lieu of Land Gross Acres Max. X $ /AC = $
J. School Sites
Compliance with the Standards of the Broward County School Board:
SCHOOL SITES NEEDED FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NOT NEEDED N/A
" " " " MIDDLE SCHOOL NOT NEEDED -`
to of Is " HIGH SCHOOL NOT NEEDED
Letter from School Board Dated
r-nr+ I r'
Site Plan Review: $ 1,072,54
Revised Site Plan: $
Plat Review: $ 270.00
Schematic Eng.: $ 450.00
Other: $
STAFF COMMENTS:
Proposed development is/#7) in genera] conformance with Tamarac's Land
Use Plan Element and recomn�s:
Adoption of Development Order # 052 Master File # 14-81 For:
PICCADILLY CAFETERIA
Project subject to the requirements included in the Report and the following
conditions:
1. Delete one parking space at the northwest corner
2. City Council to approve the Water and Sewer Agreement
3. City Council to approve the Water Retention Agreement
4. Fire Department recommends a sprinkler system -
and a Post
Indicator Valve be installed by the siamese connection.
5. Subject to Council acceptance of $13,000.00 check for
traffic light, check to be held in escrow.